From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 24 20:33:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7080416A41F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:33:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bfoz@bfoz.net) Received: from sccrmhc14.comcast.net (sccrmhc14.comcast.net [204.127.202.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E6BA43D45 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:33:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bfoz@bfoz.net) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (c-24-6-134-233.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[24.6.134.233]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with ESMTP id <2005072420330201400k6fg9e>; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:33:02 +0000 Message-ID: <42E3FAFC.7030303@bfoz.net> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:33:00 -0700 From: Brandon Fosdick User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050721) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: SMP support maturity? AMD64x2 or FX-57? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:33:03 -0000 Thanks for all of the replies. It sounds like SMP is doing better than I thought so I've decided to go with the dual core option. Thanks for the help