Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Jul 1999 19:51:46 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Tani Hosokawa <unknown@riverstyx.net>
To:        David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com>
Cc:        Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   RE: Known MMAP() race conditions ... ?
Message-ID:  <Pine.LNX.4.10.9907141948260.2405-100000@avarice.riverstyx.net>
In-Reply-To: <000201bece6c$79350420$021d85d1@youwant.to>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Wed, 14 Jul 1999, David Schwartz wrote:

> > On Thu, 15 Jul 1999, Terry Lambert wrote:
> >
> > > > Applications requiring large numbers of threads.
> > > Balk.  "Rodents of unusual size?  I don't believe they exist...".
> >
> > BTW, what would you consider to be a large number of threads?  64?  128?
> > More?  How about a threaded webserver?  Apache *is* going to be threaded,
> > you know...
> 
> 	I would hope that no matter how much Apache is threaded, it doesn't use a
> 'one thread per request' model. The cases where you honestly do require
> large numbers of threads (like 300 plus) are very rare.
> 
> 	In every such case I've ever seen, it was theoretically possible to 'code
> your way out' of the need for that number of threads. The problem is that
> sometimes it's more effort than it's worth.

The current model is a hybrid thread/process model, with a number of
processes each with a large number of threads in each, each thread
processing one request. From what I've seen, 64 threads/process is about
right.  So, in one Apache daemon, you can expect to see >1000 threads,
running inside 10-20 processes.  Does that count as a large number?

---
tani hosokawa
river styx internet




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.10.9907141948260.2405-100000>