Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 22:04:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Jamie Bowden <ragnar@sysabend.org> To: Dan Langille <junkmale@xtra.co.nz> Cc: Jasper O'Malley <jooji@webnology.com>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Mickey Mouse networking... Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990527220313.26922B-100000@beelzebubba.sysabend.org> In-Reply-To: <199905280204.WAA17980@gatekeeper.itribe.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 27 May 1999, Jamie Bowden wrote: :On Fri, 28 May 1999, Dan Langille wrote: : ::On 27 May 99, at 13:41, Jasper O'Malley wrote: : ::> Another reason Microsoft sucks...whilst attempting to set an IP address on ::> a NIC in a Win98 box to 10.4.100.255/255.255.0.0, I encountered the error ::> message: ::> ::> "The specified IP address is not valid." ::> ::> I say we take a collection to send the Microsoft programmers to a class on ::> IP subnetting. :: ::OK. I'll be the lamb to the slaughter. :: ::I understood that ip addresses ending in either 0 or 255 were not to be ::used. They are both used as broadcast addresses. Is that correct? :: ::If the above is correct, why is the IP address supplied above correct? : :The first address in a subnet (any subnet, from a /8 to a /30) is the :network address. In 4.2 BSD it was also the braodcast address. The rest :of the world, including BSD 4.3 and later use the last address in a subnet :as the broadcast address. I don't think windows supports 4.2 BSD :compatibility, so the above error is perfectly valid. As he pointed out in a later post, the address above is valid. I made the same mistake mickeysoft did, and only looked at the last octet. Jamie Bowden -- If we've got to fight over grep, sign me up. But boggle can go. -Ted Faber (on Hasbro's request for removal of /usr/games/boggle) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.990527220313.26922B-100000>