Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 28 Mar 2004 14:03:37 +0200
From:      des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
To:        "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: Is MTX_CONTESTED evil?
Message-ID:  <xzpisgpuqjq.fsf@dwp.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <200403261413.i2QEDKHw001781@green.homeunix.org> (Brian F. Feldman's message of "Fri, 26 Mar 2004 09:13:20 -0500")
References:  <200403261413.i2QEDKHw001781@green.homeunix.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> des@des.no (Dag-Erling =3D?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=3DF8rgrav?=3D) wrote:
> > Making ADAPTIVE_MUTEXES default will not catch more bugs, it will just
> > piss off users.
> What in the world you are talking about?  I didn't know that a large clas=
s=20
> of bugs existed on SMP, turned on ADAPTIVE_MUTEXES, and found those bugs.
> QED.

ADAPTIVE_MUTEXES currently makes the system unusable.  If we turn it
on by default, people will simply stop using FreeBSD (or at least stop
upgrading).

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpisgpuqjq.fsf>