From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jan 3 15:17:18 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF56A5F58B for ; Sun, 3 Jan 2016 15:17:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baho-utot@columbus.rr.com) Received: from cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.166.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC7D14EF for ; Sun, 3 Jan 2016 15:17:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baho-utot@columbus.rr.com) Received: from [75.187.32.8] ([75.187.32.8:55674] helo=raspberrypi.bildanet.com) by cdptpa-oedge01 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id 40/37-08871-C7B39865; Sun, 03 Jan 2016 15:17:16 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.40] (helo=baho-utot.bildanet.com) by raspberrypi.bildanet.com with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aFkPE-0001et-CE for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2016 10:17:16 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Baho Utot Subject: Build world release Message-ID: <56893B7C.6040508@columbus.rr.com> Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 10:17:16 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/42.0 SeaMonkey/2.39 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.118:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 15:17:18 -0000 I have a system that I installed FreeBSD-10.2 from the amd64 memstick image. I then updated the system to FreeBSD-CURRENT using the instructions from the online handbook, which worked well except having trouble with mergemaster, but that is another story . I would like to create a snapshot based on CURRENT using this system so I can use to install onto other systems. This system has no ports installed what so ever, zip, nada, nothing ie very clean system. Which one of these methods would be better to use? The following sequence of commands can be used to build a ``-CURRENT snapshot'': cd /usr svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head src cd src make buildworld buildkernel cd release make release make install DESTDIR=/var/freebsd-snapshot OR The following sequence of commands can be used to build a ``-CURRENT snapshot'' in a clean environment,including ports and documentation: cd /usr/src/release sh release.sh Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jan 3 17:35:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02636A606A6 for ; Sun, 3 Jan 2016 17:34:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from khitai.pang@outlook.com) Received: from BLU004-OMC4S18.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s18.hotmail.com [65.55.111.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACB1E1795 for ; Sun, 3 Jan 2016 17:34:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from khitai.pang@outlook.com) Received: from BLU437-SMTP39 ([65.55.111.137]) by BLU004-OMC4S18.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Sun, 3 Jan 2016 09:33:52 -0800 X-TMN: [Wxjy5hXo/BR6hlxoc8v2JqjGeukTkMX/Rd6nnkFzLpM=] X-Originating-Email: [khitai.pang@outlook.com] Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Khitai Pang Subject: building smbfs: undefined reference Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 01:33:38 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Jan 2016 17:33:51.0933 (UTC) FILETIME=[E97F06D0:01D1464C] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 17:35:00 -0000 I tried mount_smbfs from ports net/samba-smbclient but got the following error: mount_smbfs: kldload(smbfs): No such file or directory So I added 'options SMBFS' in my kernel config file, and kernel building failed: /var/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:(.text+0x94): undefined reference to `smb_makescred' /var/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:(.text+0x367): undefined reference to `smb_makescred' /var/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:(.text+0x37a): undefined reference to `smb_read' smbfs_io.o: In function `smbfs_vinvalbuf': /var/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:(.text+0x6cb): undefined reference to `smb_td_intr' ... A lot of undefined references. By simple grep I found that the missing functions are in sys/netsmb, so maybe I should also add 'options NETSMB'? Anything else? Where can I find documentation about this? Thanks Khitai From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 4 02:52:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A8BBA6139F for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 02:52:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gregory.orange@calorieking.com) Received: from pandora.au.calorieking.net (mail.au.calorieking.net [115.70.179.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42D8E15F1 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 02:52:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gregory.orange@calorieking.com) Received: from pandora.au.calorieking.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pandora.au.calorieking.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E0DE3 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 10:46:26 +0800 (WST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at calorieking.com Received: from pandora.au.calorieking.net ([127.0.0.1]) by pandora.au.calorieking.net (mail.au.calorieking.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w3y_UU8spjyC for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 10:46:25 +0800 (WST) Received: from [192.168.2.118] (freia.ne1.au.calorieking.net [192.168.2.118]) by pandora.au.calorieking.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A380FDF for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 10:46:25 +0800 (WST) Subject: Re: Upgrade from 8.4 to 10.2 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <566E367B.70604@calorieking.com> From: Gregory Orange Message-ID: <5689DCFF.1070104@calorieking.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 10:46:23 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 02:52:10 -0000 On 27/12/15 22:33, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > On 14 December 2015 at 06:24, Gregory Orange > wrote: >> On 12/12/15 19:50, Peter Harrison via freebsd-questions wrote: >>> I have a server I want to upgrade from 8.4-R to 10.2 using a binary >>> upgrade. >>> What's the preferred way of doing that? Ie. Should I jump to 9 first? And >>> can I safely do it remotely or do I need to be on front of the console? >>> >> FWIW I successfully upgraded over a dozen FreeBSD 8.4 amd64 machines >> straight to 10.1 earlier this year, bypassing 9.x all together. One of the >> machines had bad enough problems to require a reinstall, but it was very >> old hardware and I didn't have physical access to it so I never got to the >> root cause. In the end we chucked it and got a new machine anyway. >> > What procedure did you use? I used the binary upgrade procedure[1] (since I mostly use -RELEASE versions of FreeBSD), something like this: # freebsd-update -r 10.1-RELEASE upgrade # freebsd-update install # reboot # freebsd-update install # pkg_list=$(pkg info -aoq) # pkg delete -a # pkg install $pkg_list # freebsd-update install HTH, Greg. [1] https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html "23.2.3. Performing Major and Minor Version Upgrades" PS: Sorry for the slow response - I'm just back from summer holidays. PPS: In reality I like to maintain a separate list of installed top-level packages for $pkg_list so that the dependencies are installed automatically and marked as automatic when I look at: # pkg query "%a %n" From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 4 12:49:43 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFF83A602FF for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 12:49:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 876511D7D for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 12:49:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from [82.113.99.186] (helo=localhost.unixarea.de) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1aG4Zo-0000KX-2K; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 13:49:32 +0100 Received: from localhost.my.domain (c720-r285885-amd64 [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.unixarea.de (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPS id u04CnSA7004456 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 4 Jan 2016 13:49:28 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.15.2/8.14.9/Submit) id u04CnR0p004455; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 13:49:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 13:49:26 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: pdw@ex-parrot.com Subject: ports/p5-Mail-RFC822-Address does not work as expected/described Message-ID: <20160104124926.GA4417@c720-r285885-amd64> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, pdw@ex-parrot.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r285885 (amd64) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 82.113.99.186 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 12:49:43 -0000 Hello, I installed from the ports the port p5-Mail-RFC822-Address to verify mail addrs against RFC822; the example code provided by the author is: #!/usr/local/bin/perl use Mail::RFC822::Address qw(valid validlist); if (valid("pdw@ex-parrot.com")) { print "That's a valid address\n"; } if (validlist("pdw@ex-parrot.com, other@elsewhere.com")) { print "That's a valid list of addresses\n"; } But I can only manage to get this working when doing the test as if (valid("pdw@ex-parrot.com") == true) { ... Why is this? I'm by no means a Perl expert :-) Thx matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ guru@unixarea.de, 🌐 http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 4 13:15:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B6FCA60C36; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 13:15:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from solene@bsd.zplay.eu) Received: from bsd.zplay.eu (bsd.zplay.eu [62.210.240.224]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "bsd.zplay.eu", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9CD41A69; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 13:15:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from solene@bsd.zplay.eu) Received: from localhost (bsd.zplay.eu [local]) by bsd.zplay.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 9aca7bb7; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 14:15:15 +0100 (CET) To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, pdw@ex-parrot.com Subject: Re: ports/p5-Mail-RFC822-Address does not work as expected/described X-PHP-Originating-Script: 0:rcube.php MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 14:15:14 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Sol=C3=A8ne_Rapenne?= Cc: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20160104124926.GA4417@c720-r285885-amd64> References: <20160104124926.GA4417@c720-r285885-amd64> Message-ID: <626864349e1a3c422fdd2389275537fd@mail.zplay.eu> X-Sender: solene@bsd.zplay.eu User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 13:15:28 -0000 Le 2016-01-04 13:49, Matthias Apitz a écrit : > Hello, > > I installed from the ports the port p5-Mail-RFC822-Address to verify > mail addrs against RFC822; the example code provided by the author is: > > > #!/usr/local/bin/perl > > use Mail::RFC822::Address qw(valid validlist); > > if (valid("pdw@ex-parrot.com")) { > print "That's a valid address\n"; > } > > if (validlist("pdw@ex-parrot.com, other@elsewhere.com")) { > print "That's a valid list of addresses\n"; > } > > But I can only manage to get this working when doing the test as > > if (valid("pdw@ex-parrot.com") == true) { > ... > > Why is this? I'm by no means a Perl expert :-) > > Thx > > matthias Hello, I tried the following : #!/usr/bin/env perl use Mail::RFC822::Address qw(valid validlist); if (valid("test@ex-parrot.com")) { print "valid\n"; } else { print "not valid\n"; } this return "not valid" You shoud always add the following on the top of your perl scripts : use stict; use warnings; When you add the 2 uses, then you get an error with the example : Possible unintended interpolation of @ex in string at ./test.pl line 7. Global symbol "@ex" requires explicit package name at ./test.pl line 7. Execution of ./test.pl aborted due to compilation errors. If you use simple quotes then, you will have the "valid" message. By using double quotes, I think it tries to call @ex array which is not what you want. Maybe the example used to work with some perl version, or it is something else I don't know, but as this, the example doesn't work. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 4 14:47:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90692A6001E for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 14:47:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul.stuffins@ravexdata.com) Received: from mail-lf0-f45.google.com (mail-lf0-f45.google.com [209.85.215.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27F0E1D83 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 14:47:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul.stuffins@ravexdata.com) Received: by mail-lf0-f45.google.com with SMTP id c192so100191094lfe.2 for ; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 06:47:00 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=w1dY8KVGSRQu9ds5YmoqsLghJ7OiAPxXcsreXCJYfEY=; b=H8xRO2ABIxkMJnllI5JO7r/XMdjkmULz4hu8+goRGes3PR+4EUQsZGysxWUCf6RmUZ 9mhXLTn/n5WZUqnDT4eynHCuVFwBS6avY8pE2lBte9eZu4exxiY9FGZZkvQmTxLmqsvR bqr5amS4PgHsl6U8QLpe8UbWYrH7ggZobsbSaDU7gb6UTVKKHpBPcWnCQUFiXWkIG4dx bimGvzxEM0nFp51CGwShPFzTQdDWo5lJenZRCqq0xOBJ0ZVnp0QNpw9umFqTM9AJE4TR WzP4IRKdF0Ht7mxtU8GuiDi5JIZZalM3yXVJnxkXgeH6UuvHC4uUUWvlICXSC3jIdOwa oupA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkiHPZm2WEEONyecA5jNoRrdyP+p+x3ORcfQF3zLcDNW8ntEbIaVBS+kzusZ3J5DEmGghbpoS2RmKvEzRAkBsvGS95xRGFfK5fi/WsXCnW1mQgwfgA= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.43.212 with SMTP id r203mr25500557lfr.162.1451918347974; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 06:39:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.75.33 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 06:39:07 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [212.69.56.43] Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 14:39:07 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Software for bandwidth management From: Paul Stuffins To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 14:47:01 -0000 Afternoon Everyone, I have a spare desktop lying around here that I want to turn into a basic bandwidth monitor, along with various other things including website filtering. I have seen https://www.untangle.com, which I believe is based on FreeBSD, but I am not keen on paying the $50 a month for a license, is there any software that anyone can recommend to me? My needs, to start with, are basically to monitor what devices are connected, and how much each device transfers on a hourly/daily/monthly basis, and potentially apply limits to each device. Many Thanks Paul From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 4 14:58:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69134A607A9 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 14:58:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no", Issuer "Fagskolen i Gj??vik" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDB3715FB for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 14:58:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u04EvsV4098633 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 4 Jan 2016 15:57:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u04Evr6h098630; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 15:57:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 15:57:53 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no To: Paul Stuffins cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Software for bandwidth management In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, AWL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail.fig.ol.no Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 14:58:06 -0000 On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 14:39-0000, Paul Stuffins wrote: > Afternoon Everyone, > > I have a spare desktop lying around here that I want to turn into a basic > bandwidth monitor, along with various other things including website > filtering. > > I have seen https://www.untangle.com, which I believe is based on FreeBSD, > but I am not keen on paying the $50 a month for a license, is there any > software that anyone can recommend to me? > > My needs, to start with, are basically to monitor what devices are > connected, and how much each device transfers on a hourly/daily/monthly > basis, and potentially apply limits to each device. A partial solution could be your spare desktop acting as a bridge(4) using two NICs, and sysutils/darkstat as the monitoring software. If you can't or don't want to pass traffic back and forth through the spare desktop, try port mirroring (Cisco SPAN port/monitor session), "ifconfig em1 up monitor", and sysutils/darkstat. -- +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestl, | Trond Endrestl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 4 16:11:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 504EBA61A66 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:11:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juan@inti.gob.ar) Received: from sbg-out.inti.gob.ar (sbg-out.inti.gob.ar [200.10.161.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E59D51C0C for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:11:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juan@inti.gob.ar) X-AuditID: c80aa145-f79586d000001bfa-3a-568a963d7c2c Received: from [200.10.161.55] (jb.inti.gob.ar [200.10.161.55]) (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by sbg-out.inti.gob.ar (SMTP_INTI) with SMTP id C4.05.07162.D369A865; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 12:56:45 -0300 (ART) Subject: Re: Software for bandwidth management To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: Juan Bernhard Message-ID: <568A9658.9010508@inti.gob.ar> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 12:57:12 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFupjluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42I5wbXQXNd2WleYwcsbYhYvv25icWD0mPFp PksAYxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxscpEgUb+Cq2NuxnbmA8xt3FyMkhIWAi8e/NYRYIW0ziwr31 bF2MXBxCApOYJDa0zWIGSQgL6Elcb/vPBGKLCChKnDnTyApiCwkESHx908EGYrMJqEl8PXMK LM4roCUxd18DO4jNIqAi8fD0D6AaDg5RgRiJpoPMECWCEidnPgHbyykQKDF741ew8cwCthJ3 5u5mhrDlJZq3zmaewMg3C0nLLCRls5CULWBkXsUoXJyUrptfWqIHDKFMvfT8JL3Eok2MkFBy 3cG4d536IUYBDkYlHt4NfR1hQqyJZcWVuYcYJTiYlUR4C4q6woR4UxIrq1KL8uOLSnNSiw8x SnOwKInzfv4uFCokkJ5YkpqdmlqQWgSTZeLglGpgnHojRKDZN03bLf9T57l5NpzbOG5d+nNA SGl7Y/WtrU+jV95oNGNeYHXqwmk3YQ/d5YejzvmvYmf4Z3FBJTbnzY5fHvYRhVJ7V7bZnbjC /fLObl1X7+tJvziX3NRae2n70xy+a6lsG9S6POec+cVke0E31GlF2IMbIbff/xWMzVlakbFE dufan0osxRmJhlrMRcWJALAYvhohAgAA X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 16:11:56 -0000 El 04/01/2016 a las 11:39 a.m., Paul Stuffins escribi: > Afternoon Everyone, > > I have a spare desktop lying around here that I want to turn into a basic > bandwidth monitor, along with various other things including website > filtering. If you mean to filter http and https by url, you will have to use a proxy, and acl filtering. I would recommend use an old desktop to do this. This will became the bottleneck of your network. > > I have seen https://www.untangle.com, which I believe is based on FreeBSD, > but I am not keen on paying the $50 a month for a license, is there any > software that anyone can recommend to me? > > My needs, to start with, are basically to monitor what devices are > connected, and how much each device transfers on a hourly/daily/monthly > basis, and potentially apply limits to each device. If you just want to know bandwith usage for each IP address on your network, you cold do 2 things: 1) Use a port mirror in your router switch port and redirect this traffic to a dedicated interface in your freebsd server and log all using net-mgmt/ipfm 2) Configure your router to log traffic to your freebsd server using netflow, then configure net-mgmt/nfdump to save and show statistics onf the server side. If you decide to use a port mirror and collect all traffic, you can also use net/httpry to log all http urls accesed from your network, but it will not work with https, you cant see the encrypted url unless you have a non transparent proxy. I hope this helps you. Saludos, Juan > > Many Thanks > Paul > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 4 16:24:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97502A61EC1 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:24:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vsasjason@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3637012A7 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:24:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vsasjason@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id f206so179353649wmf.0 for ; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 08:24:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=gzZP1cThuiZJo6LH3XPp+FYgTEHyI2UquPOcOB4UgPc=; b=pxbZFjODPPIr2bNw8MCMUiJhAdjN6GjHTQrThTLLJd+xUSW8SswygHV9WYiMQ3nFCS b4OPXLBdc232KfEjcQM4XAsbXMEcXiNzVo7VoR+lP+rJv7dHUXsCb9TVPKHyxTER6zjU 4SVk1zKE9ZHxOyHXp6HMTsNYAWNum6zD7Wo2U9n5XOk0ZwBrDXtsGTzfa46KNqfASU/V eWTvSuBcXqKM4+MsD8OhLiD9Yk9xbJ80SyI4R6adm4lx3+K/vmYVjOnNY0SPHwHukGNS RNem4CT/CoVHbwSfRi051hPquMkASvfgCypJvSWgozuw9sQ6EHOiBMyJr1+qeTK6QAR5 UeHQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.21.19 with SMTP id 19mr39113224wmv.43.1451924682805; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 08:24:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.76.207 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 08:24:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.76.207 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 08:24:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <568A9658.9010508@inti.gob.ar> References: <568A9658.9010508@inti.gob.ar> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:24:42 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Software for bandwidth management From: Anton Sayetsky To: Juan Bernhard Cc: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 16:24:44 -0000 4 =D1=8F=D0=BD=D0=B2. 2016 =D0=B3. 18:12 =D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=BB=D1=8C=D0=B7=D0= =BE=D0=B2=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8C "Juan Bernhard" =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB: > > > El 04/01/2016 a las 11:39 a.m., Paul Stuffins escribi=C3=B3: >> >> Afternoon Everyone, >> >> I have a spare desktop lying around here that I want to turn into a basi= c >> bandwidth monitor, along with various other things including website >> filtering. > > > If you mean to filter http and https ^ > by url, you will have to use a proxy, and acl filtering. It is impossible without SSL spoofing. > I would recommend use an old desktop to do this. This will became the bottleneck of your network. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 4 17:06:04 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB22A62F17 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:06:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markus@edemalm.se) Received: from server.edemalm.se (server.edemalm.se [IPv6:2001:470:28:47::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "server.edemalm.se", Issuer "Markus Edemalm TLS CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D6C21AB2 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:06:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markus@edemalm.se) Received: from host-10.edemalm.se (host-10.edemalm.se [IPv6:2001:470:28:47::10]) by server.edemalm.se with ESMTPSA id u04H60mI002133 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:06:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from markus@edemalm.se) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=edemalm.se; s=edemalm; t=1451927161; bh=pdIiL11Xo+0hs64GBl/DnvWGhZmFInyUhao5BMXDwTU=; h=From:Subject:Date:To; b=CL2W3XGyfl/8YBzqbElfedPOqLL1yMCSq+tL69BeCH3IeyWx2ZsAYaq3PwX6THn5e nqPiVg8IVRCdoCmYdJb/s4MgOAn3qWk+AMDuBuR8m74hxdSmD8IfG79wsL8HngL4Y5 49951lFpBzbxcdRvffCfQ0/JAJ6vs34RDNVwQd/8= From: Markus Edemalm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Safe to delete old files in /usr/lib? Message-Id: Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:06:00 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.1 \(3096.5\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5) Received-SPF: Pass (sender authenticated); receiver=server.edemalm.se; client-ip=IPv6:2001:470:28:47::10; envelope-from= Received-SPF: Pass (sender authenticated); receiver=server.edemalm.se; client-ip=IPv6:2001:470:28:47::10; helo=host-10.edemalm.se X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 17:06:04 -0000 Hello, My system was first installed as 10.0-RELEASE. I have since upgraded to = 10.1, 10.1-STABLE, 10.2-RELEASE and is now at 10.2-RELEASE-p8. I=E2=80=99ve rebuild from source and followed the steps in the handbook. = Everything is fine=E2=80=A6 but: I see many files in /usr/lib with old dates, apparently they are no = longer installed during upgrades. My /etc/make.conf looks like this: NO_PROFILE=3Dtrue WITHOUT_X11=3Dyes Today, January the 4th, I upgraded to -p8. The newly installed files has = todays date, i.e =E2=80=9DJan 4=E2=80=9D. If I do: ls -lF /usr/lib | grep -v 'Jan 4' | awk {'print $9'} =E2=80=A6I get the following list of (obsolete?) files and folders with = older dates. aout/ compat/ libBlocksRuntime.a libalias.a libalias_cuseeme.a libalias_dummy.a libalias_ftp.a libalias_irc.a libalias_nbt.a libalias_pptp.a libalias_skinny.a libalias_smedia.a libarchive.a libasn1.a libauditd.a libavl.a libbegemot.a libbsdxml.a libbsm.a libbsnmp.a libbsnmptools.a libbz2.a libc++.a libc++.so libc.a libc.so libc_nonshared.a libcalendar.a libcam.a libcom_err.a libcompat.a libcompiler_rt.a libcrypt.a libctf.a libcxxrt.a libdevinfo.a libdevstat.a libdialog.a libdpv.a libdtrace.a libdwarf.a libedit.a libelf.a libexecinfo.a libfetch.a libfigpar.a libfl.a libform.a libformw.a libgcc_eh.a libgcov.a libgeom.a libgnuregex.a libgomp.a libgpib.a libgssapi.a libgssapi_krb5.a libgssapi_ntlm.a libgssapi_spnego.a libhdb.a libheimbase.a libheimntlm.a libheimsqlite.a libhistory.a libhx509.a libipsec.a libipx.a libjail.a libkadm5clnt.a libkadm5srv.a libkafs5.a libkdc.a libkiconv.a libkrb5.a libkvm.a libl.a libln.a liblzma.a libm.a libmagic.a libmd.a libmemstat.a libmenu.a libmenuw.a libmp.a libmt.a libncurses.a libncursesw.a libnetgraph.a libngatm.a libnvpair.a libopie.a libpam.a libpanel.a libpanelw.a libpcap.a libpmc.a libproc.a libprocstat.a libradius.a libreadline.a libroken.a librpcsec_gss.a librpcsvc.a librt.a librtld_db.a libsbuf.a libsmb.a libssl.a libssp.a libssp_nonshared.a libstand.a libstdbuf.a libstdthreads.a libtacplus.a libthr.a libthread_db.a libufs.a libugidfw.a libulog.a libumem.a libusb.a libusbhid.a libutil.a libuutil.a libvgl.a libvmmapi.a libwind.a libwrap.a liby.a libypclnt.a libz.a libzfs.a libzfs_core.a libzpool.a Would it be safe to delete them? /ME From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 4 17:13:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6823EA61266 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:13:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@ravexdata.com) Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com (mail-wm0-f65.google.com [74.125.82.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F1121F7B for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:13:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@ravexdata.com) Received: by mail-wm0-f65.google.com with SMTP id b14so25359084wmb.1 for ; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 09:13:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3O8j3rbdCEkaTvGleA97MUyk4+RlHl+wuxsUxGbVilY=; b=S+LVz9P+9G+aDKdSWrMm17ZgCjcYsvNULGn9ocLeJC8yaeztRyEV95UP8Pwws7v82b lDQC6Njt4n4sftE9DYHC7yak5j1BYj1ObN7gZWLase7V8V/1ilRCp8PHV14b9KI3N8/u gfX4LpaK4exNeJqtj2NC9B2qcG+fuzuDbu0QIF9ymdlNhVk7WQ8kiogfp1ZHCBhf1wY0 lgOhqLB72XNxZ7WOabE/khDdcAN9YJIQC5eGWmJrXW9yZfDPQpXTr4k8MXQ9erJifmEW NtJmgaXQFuCkHyoD2dVWgAOJIB7DW7dSidM1sV0ZCsXG3PmDNEBbdADk0WvGPLniYYLT /grA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk8otKX1yd+/Hrsk0FerIdFmnzp5Ca+jNq7ehXtq59Q9bUWAP97z5Wi1MJw1yMzN0yghx9EazD+7lRt2+vm/1f2+KsWIQ== X-Received: by 10.28.4.145 with SMTP id 139mr75654426wme.56.1451919847117; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 07:04:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.20.14] (cust43-dsl56.idnet.net. [212.69.56.43]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m16sm78758566wmb.13.2016.01.04.07.04.05 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 04 Jan 2016 07:04:05 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Software for bandwidth management To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: Paul Stuffins Message-ID: <568A89EF.6020601@ravexdata.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 15:04:15 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 17:13:42 -0000 On 04/01/2016 14:57, Trond Endrestl wrote: > On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 14:39-0000, Paul Stuffins wrote: > >> Afternoon Everyone, >> >> I have a spare desktop lying around here that I want to turn into a basic >> bandwidth monitor, along with various other things including website >> filtering. >> >> I have seen https://www.untangle.com, which I believe is based on FreeBSD, >> but I am not keen on paying the $50 a month for a license, is there any >> software that anyone can recommend to me? >> >> My needs, to start with, are basically to monitor what devices are >> connected, and how much each device transfers on a hourly/daily/monthly >> basis, and potentially apply limits to each device. > A partial solution could be your spare desktop acting as a bridge(4) > using two NICs, and sysutils/darkstat as the monitoring software. > > If you can't or don't want to pass traffic back and forth through the > spare desktop, try port mirroring (Cisco SPAN port/monitor session), > "ifconfig em1 up monitor", and sysutils/darkstat. > I was thinking of adding a second NIC, and positioning it between my modem and the rest of my network. Paul From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 4 17:20:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CE8AA61500 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:20:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 192E61352 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:20:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-21-51.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.21.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F1433CDB8; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:12:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id u04HCBXP003422; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:12:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:12:11 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Markus Edemalm Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Safe to delete old files in /usr/lib? Message-Id: <20160104181211.76907a30.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 17:20:13 -0000 On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:06:00 +0100, Markus Edemalm wrote: > Hello, > > My system was first installed as 10.0-RELEASE. I have since upgraded to 10.1, 10.1-STABLE, 10.2-RELEASE and is now at 10.2-RELEASE-p8. > I’ve rebuild from source and followed the steps in the handbook. Everything is fine… but: > > I see many files in /usr/lib with old dates, apparently they are no longer installed during upgrades. > > My /etc/make.conf looks like this: > > NO_PROFILE=true > WITHOUT_X11=yes > > Today, January the 4th, I upgraded to -p8. The newly installed files has todays date, i.e ”Jan 4”. > If I do: > > ls -lF /usr/lib | grep -v 'Jan 4' | awk {'print $9'} > > …I get the following list of (obsolete?) files and folders with older dates. > > aout/ > compat/ > libBlocksRuntime.a > libalias.a > libalias_cuseeme.a > libalias_dummy.a > libalias_ftp.a > libalias_irc.a > libalias_nbt.a > libalias_pptp.a > libalias_skinny.a > libalias_smedia.a > libarchive.a > libasn1.a > libauditd.a > libavl.a > libbegemot.a > libbsdxml.a > libbsm.a > libbsnmp.a > libbsnmptools.a > libbz2.a > libc++.a > libc++.so > libc.a > libc.so > libc_nonshared.a > libcalendar.a > libcam.a > libcom_err.a > libcompat.a > libcompiler_rt.a > libcrypt.a > libctf.a > libcxxrt.a > libdevinfo.a > libdevstat.a > libdialog.a > libdpv.a > libdtrace.a > libdwarf.a > libedit.a > libelf.a > libexecinfo.a > libfetch.a > libfigpar.a > libfl.a > libform.a > libformw.a > libgcc_eh.a > libgcov.a > libgeom.a > libgnuregex.a > libgomp.a > libgpib.a > libgssapi.a > libgssapi_krb5.a > libgssapi_ntlm.a > libgssapi_spnego.a > libhdb.a > libheimbase.a > libheimntlm.a > libheimsqlite.a > libhistory.a > libhx509.a > libipsec.a > libipx.a > libjail.a > libkadm5clnt.a > libkadm5srv.a > libkafs5.a > libkdc.a > libkiconv.a > libkrb5.a > libkvm.a > libl.a > libln.a > liblzma.a > libm.a > libmagic.a > libmd.a > libmemstat.a > libmenu.a > libmenuw.a > libmp.a > libmt.a > libncurses.a > libncursesw.a > libnetgraph.a > libngatm.a > libnvpair.a > libopie.a > libpam.a > libpanel.a > libpanelw.a > libpcap.a > libpmc.a > libproc.a > libprocstat.a > libradius.a > libreadline.a > libroken.a > librpcsec_gss.a > librpcsvc.a > librt.a > librtld_db.a > libsbuf.a > libsmb.a > libssl.a > libssp.a > libssp_nonshared.a > libstand.a > libstdbuf.a > libstdthreads.a > libtacplus.a > libthr.a > libthread_db.a > libufs.a > libugidfw.a > libulog.a > libumem.a > libusb.a > libusbhid.a > libutil.a > libuutil.a > libvgl.a > libvmmapi.a > libwind.a > libwrap.a > liby.a > libypclnt.a > libz.a > libzfs.a > libzfs_core.a > libzpool.a > > Would it be safe to delete them? If you install from source, use the following targets: # check-old - List obsolete directories/files/libraries. # check-old-dirs - List obsolete directories. # check-old-files - List obsolete files. # check-old-libs - List obsolete libraries. And then: # delete-old - Delete obsolete directories/files/libraries. # delete-old-dirs - Delete obsolete directories. # delete-old-files - Delete obsolete files. # delete-old-libs - Delete obsolete libraries. See the comment header of /usr/src/Makefile for more information (and how those targets fit the recommended updating procedure, listed a few lines later). Generally speaking: As long as no program is linked against those files, and no program requires them, they can be deleted. This statement highly depends on which programs you have installed and what they are linked against. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 4 17:28:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A33A619BB for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:28:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markus@edemalm.se) Received: from server.edemalm.se (server.edemalm.se [IPv6:2001:470:28:47::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "server.edemalm.se", Issuer "Markus Edemalm TLS CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4B011DA1 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:28:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markus@edemalm.se) Received: from host-10.edemalm.se (host-10.edemalm.se [IPv6:2001:470:28:47::10]) by server.edemalm.se with ESMTPSA id u04HSE8b020265 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:28:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from markus@edemalm.se) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=edemalm.se; s=edemalm; t=1451928495; bh=5d/dnIg6+jqjG6d8acP6U4/97nzIOpoGCdsxi8Vzdrw=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=qO21D6jCXrlaFyUkAsaltQtXnpwLKdg0v3O/8UXApUK9lgnwBGOCpmmeUnp7sypqv B9WOEZtfajzOgUSNJyUngDL1FGadTWhfJNmIHiv6Qquar71B91FEDtXl1lw4LwTDaj sMifaWoAgNUhof7u4oM6WJ7a3/i6g+bHFSEndODo= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.1 \(3096.5\)) Subject: Re: Safe to delete old files in /usr/lib? From: Markus Edemalm In-Reply-To: <20160104181211.76907a30.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:28:14 +0100 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20160104181211.76907a30.freebsd@edvax.de> To: Polytropon X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5) Received-SPF: Pass (sender authenticated); receiver=server.edemalm.se; client-ip=IPv6:2001:470:28:47::10; envelope-from= Received-SPF: Pass (sender authenticated); receiver=server.edemalm.se; client-ip=IPv6:2001:470:28:47::10; helo=host-10.edemalm.se X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 17:28:19 -0000 > 4 jan. 2016 kl. 18:12 skrev Polytropon : >=20 > On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:06:00 +0100, Markus Edemalm wrote: >> Hello, >>=20 >> My system was first installed as 10.0-RELEASE. I have since upgraded = to 10.1, 10.1-STABLE, 10.2-RELEASE and is now at 10.2-RELEASE-p8. >> I=E2=80=99ve rebuild from source and followed the steps in the = handbook. Everything is fine=E2=80=A6 but: >>=20 >> I see many files in /usr/lib with old dates, apparently they are no = longer installed during upgrades. >>=20 >> My /etc/make.conf looks like this: >>=20 >> NO_PROFILE=3Dtrue >> WITHOUT_X11=3Dyes >>=20 >> Today, January the 4th, I upgraded to -p8. The newly installed files = has todays date, i.e =E2=80=9DJan 4=E2=80=9D. >> If I do: >>=20 >> ls -lF /usr/lib | grep -v 'Jan 4' | awk {'print $9'} >>=20 >> =E2=80=A6I get the following list of (obsolete?) files and folders = with older dates. >>=20 >> aout/ >> compat/ >> libBlocksRuntime.a >> libalias.a >> libalias_cuseeme.a [long list cut] >> liby.a >> libypclnt.a >> libz.a >> libzfs.a >> libzfs_core.a >> libzpool.a >>=20 >> Would it be safe to delete them? >=20 > If you install from source, use the following targets: >=20 > # check-old - List obsolete directories/files/libraries. > # check-old-dirs - List obsolete directories. > # check-old-files - List obsolete files. > # check-old-libs - List obsolete libraries. Sorry, no files in /usr/lib comes up. Just a few others I know about. > And then: >=20 > # delete-old - Delete obsolete directories/files/libraries. > # delete-old-dirs - Delete obsolete directories. > # delete-old-files - Delete obsolete files. > # delete-old-libs - Delete obsolete libraries. >=20 > See the comment header of /usr/src/Makefile for more information > (and how those targets fit the recommended updating procedure, > listed a few lines later). >=20 > Generally speaking: As long as no program is linked against those > files, and no program requires them, they can be deleted. This > statement highly depends on which programs you have installed > and what they are linked against. :-) Thank you. Still wonder why they are so many and where the came from in = the first place. And, they are all .a files, except for libc++.so and libc.so. I added NO_PROFILE=3Dtrue to /etc/make.conf a while back. Is that = relevant? >=20 > --=20 > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, =E2=80=A6 Thanks again, ME From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 4 17:52:48 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFCFBA6224D for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:52:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 512161CB1 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:52:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-21-51.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.21.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EBB93CD36; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:52:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id u04Hqjl2003535; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:52:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:52:45 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Markus Edemalm Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Safe to delete old files in /usr/lib? Message-Id: <20160104185245.5ca2e4f1.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20160104181211.76907a30.freebsd@edvax.de> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 17:52:48 -0000 On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:28:14 +0100, Markus Edemalm wrote: > > 4 jan. 2016 kl. 18:12 skrev Polytropon : > > > > On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:06:00 +0100, Markus Edemalm wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> My system was first installed as 10.0-RELEASE. I have since upgraded to 10.1, 10.1-STABLE, 10.2-RELEASE and is now at 10.2-RELEASE-p8. > >> I’ve rebuild from source and followed the steps in the handbook. Everything is fine… but: > >> > >> I see many files in /usr/lib with old dates, apparently they are no longer installed during upgrades. > >> > >> My /etc/make.conf looks like this: > >> > >> NO_PROFILE=true > >> WITHOUT_X11=yes > >> > >> Today, January the 4th, I upgraded to -p8. The newly installed files has todays date, i.e ”Jan 4”. > >> If I do: > >> > >> ls -lF /usr/lib | grep -v 'Jan 4' | awk {'print $9'} > >> > >> …I get the following list of (obsolete?) files and folders with older dates. > >> > >> aout/ > >> compat/ > >> libBlocksRuntime.a > >> libalias.a > >> libalias_cuseeme.a > > [long list cut] > > >> liby.a > >> libypclnt.a > >> libz.a > >> libzfs.a > >> libzfs_core.a > >> libzpool.a > >> > >> Would it be safe to delete them? > > > > If you install from source, use the following targets: > > > > # check-old - List obsolete directories/files/libraries. > > # check-old-dirs - List obsolete directories. > > # check-old-files - List obsolete files. > > # check-old-libs - List obsolete libraries. > > Sorry, no files in /usr/lib comes up. Just a few others I know about. > > > And then: > > > > # delete-old - Delete obsolete directories/files/libraries. > > # delete-old-dirs - Delete obsolete directories. > > # delete-old-files - Delete obsolete files. > > # delete-old-libs - Delete obsolete libraries. > > > > See the comment header of /usr/src/Makefile for more information > > (and how those targets fit the recommended updating procedure, > > listed a few lines later). > > > > Generally speaking: As long as no program is linked against those > > files, and no program requires them, they can be deleted. This > > statement highly depends on which programs you have installed > > and what they are linked against. :-) > > Thank you. Still wonder why they are so many and where the came from in the first place. They have been installed by the OS (from the initial installation media or subsequent update processes), as the /usr/lib directory is reserved for OS files (like /usr/local/lib is for 3rd party libraries). > And, they are all .a files, except for libc++.so and libc.so. > > I added NO_PROFILE=true to /etc/make.conf a while back. Is that relevant? Hmmm... I always thought that would be the default (no profiling libs being built and installed). But according to "man src.conf", the setting's name is WITHOUT_PROFILE, not NO_PROFILE. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 4 18:18:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0FEEA62C2D for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:18:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markus@edemalm.se) Received: from server.edemalm.se (server.edemalm.se [IPv6:2001:470:28:47::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "server.edemalm.se", Issuer "Markus Edemalm TLS CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42ABC1D4D for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:18:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markus@edemalm.se) Received: from host-10.edemalm.se (host-10.edemalm.se [IPv6:2001:470:28:47::10]) by server.edemalm.se with ESMTPSA id u04II2Nw020432 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:18:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from markus@edemalm.se) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=edemalm.se; s=edemalm; t=1451931483; bh=HaZfnHNyD3QZCIFrw70a4ixlMRJ4B59rGBK/Ye2TCt0=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=f5zBTYKeuhq+ZZA027asxbHmjLDqE0YDJnA9Ohl2UhS2QHyRiuJ2vBNZfTvhO2H8I aklYmO2Q7rJKLOT8M4XFZxOAe/g5b8YFFN1/WtEsRKLCJzvkxkh+Mh9rSAXDqZygqO dVO5OfkWKDqdWNILRs/LrCXGqxOycnm6JOevO2vE= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.1 \(3096.5\)) Subject: Re: Safe to delete old files in /usr/lib? From: Markus Edemalm In-Reply-To: <20160104185245.5ca2e4f1.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:18:02 +0100 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20160104181211.76907a30.freebsd@edvax.de> <20160104185245.5ca2e4f1.freebsd@edvax.de> To: Polytropon X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5) Received-SPF: Pass (sender authenticated); receiver=server.edemalm.se; client-ip=IPv6:2001:470:28:47::10; envelope-from= Received-SPF: Pass (sender authenticated); receiver=server.edemalm.se; client-ip=IPv6:2001:470:28:47::10; helo=host-10.edemalm.se X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 18:18:06 -0000 > 4 jan. 2016 kl. 18:52 skrev Polytropon : >=20 > On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:28:14 +0100, Markus Edemalm wrote: >>> 4 jan. 2016 kl. 18:12 skrev Polytropon : >>>=20 >>> On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:06:00 +0100, Markus Edemalm wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>>=20 >>>> My system was first installed as 10.0-RELEASE. I have since = upgraded to 10.1, 10.1-STABLE, 10.2-RELEASE and is now at = 10.2-RELEASE-p8. >>>> I=E2=80=99ve rebuild from source and followed the steps in the = handbook. Everything is fine=E2=80=A6 but: >>>>=20 >>>> I see many files in /usr/lib with old dates, apparently they are no = longer installed during upgrades. >>>>=20 >>>> My /etc/make.conf looks like this: >>>>=20 >>>> NO_PROFILE=3Dtrue >>>> WITHOUT_X11=3Dyes >>>>=20 >>>> Today, January the 4th, I upgraded to -p8. The newly installed = files has todays date, i.e =E2=80=9DJan 4=E2=80=9D. >>>> If I do: >>>>=20 >>>> ls -lF /usr/lib | grep -v 'Jan 4' | awk {'print $9'} >>>>=20 >>>> =E2=80=A6I get the following list of (obsolete?) files and folders = with older dates. >>>>=20 >>>> aout/ >>>> compat/ >>>> libBlocksRuntime.a >>>> libalias.a >>>> libalias_cuseeme.a >>=20 >> [long list cut] >>=20 >>>> liby.a >>>> libypclnt.a >>>> libz.a >>>> libzfs.a >>>> libzfs_core.a >>>> libzpool.a >>>>=20 >>>> Would it be safe to delete them? >>>=20 >>> If you install from source, use the following targets: >>>=20 >>> # check-old - List obsolete directories/files/libraries. >>> # check-old-dirs - List obsolete directories. >>> # check-old-files - List obsolete files. >>> # check-old-libs - List obsolete libraries. >>=20 >> Sorry, no files in /usr/lib comes up. Just a few others I know about. >>=20 >>> And then: >>>=20 >>> # delete-old - Delete obsolete directories/files/libraries. >>> # delete-old-dirs - Delete obsolete directories. >>> # delete-old-files - Delete obsolete files. >>> # delete-old-libs - Delete obsolete libraries. >>>=20 >>> See the comment header of /usr/src/Makefile for more information >>> (and how those targets fit the recommended updating procedure, >>> listed a few lines later). >>>=20 >>> Generally speaking: As long as no program is linked against those >>> files, and no program requires them, they can be deleted. This >>> statement highly depends on which programs you have installed >>> and what they are linked against. :-) >>=20 >> Thank you. Still wonder why they are so many and where the came from = in the first place. >=20 > They have been installed by the OS (from the initial installation > media or subsequent update processes), as the /usr/lib directory > is reserved for OS files (like /usr/local/lib is for 3rd party > libraries). >=20 >=20 >=20 >> And, they are all .a files, except for libc++.so and libc.so. >>=20 >> I added NO_PROFILE=3Dtrue to /etc/make.conf a while back. Is that = relevant? >=20 > Hmmm... I always thought that would be the default (no profiling libs > being built and installed). But according to "man src.conf", the > setting's name is WITHOUT_PROFILE, not NO_PROFILE. Hmm. I forgot about src.conf, I got: cat /etc/src.conf=20 WITHOUT_BLUETOOTH=3Dyes WITHOUT_FLOPPY=3Dyes WITHOUT_IPFW=3Dyes WITHOUT_IPFILTER=3Dyes That may explain why _some_ libs are not being built and installed. But still, more than 100 .a files with old dates. Doesn=E2=80=99t make = sense to me at all. /ME From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 4 19:34:22 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44097A6174E for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:34:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7CC218EA for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:34:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-21-51.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.21.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CCE23CDCA; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 20:34:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id u04JYIaQ003832; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 20:34:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 20:34:18 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Markus Edemalm Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Safe to delete old files in /usr/lib? Message-Id: <20160104203418.aee8df91.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20160104181211.76907a30.freebsd@edvax.de> <20160104185245.5ca2e4f1.freebsd@edvax.de> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 19:34:22 -0000 On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:18:02 +0100, Markus Edemalm wrote: > > 4 jan. 2016 kl. 18:52 skrev Polytropon : > > > > On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:28:14 +0100, Markus Edemalm wrote: > >>> 4 jan. 2016 kl. 18:12 skrev Polytropon : > >>> > >>> On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:06:00 +0100, Markus Edemalm wrote: > >>>> Hello, > >>>> > >>>> My system was first installed as 10.0-RELEASE. I have since upgraded to 10.1, 10.1-STABLE, 10.2-RELEASE and is now at 10.2-RELEASE-p8. > >>>> I’ve rebuild from source and followed the steps in the handbook. Everything is fine… but: > >>>> > >>>> I see many files in /usr/lib with old dates, apparently they are no longer installed during upgrades. > >>>> > >>>> My /etc/make.conf looks like this: > >>>> > >>>> NO_PROFILE=true > >>>> WITHOUT_X11=yes > >>>> > >>>> Today, January the 4th, I upgraded to -p8. The newly installed files has todays date, i.e ”Jan 4”. > >>>> If I do: > >>>> > >>>> ls -lF /usr/lib | grep -v 'Jan 4' | awk {'print $9'} > >>>> > >>>> …I get the following list of (obsolete?) files and folders with older dates. > >>>> > >>>> aout/ > >>>> compat/ > >>>> libBlocksRuntime.a > >>>> libalias.a > >>>> libalias_cuseeme.a > >> > >> [long list cut] > >> > >>>> liby.a > >>>> libypclnt.a > >>>> libz.a > >>>> libzfs.a > >>>> libzfs_core.a > >>>> libzpool.a > >>>> > >>>> Would it be safe to delete them? > >>> > >>> If you install from source, use the following targets: > >>> > >>> # check-old - List obsolete directories/files/libraries. > >>> # check-old-dirs - List obsolete directories. > >>> # check-old-files - List obsolete files. > >>> # check-old-libs - List obsolete libraries. > >> > >> Sorry, no files in /usr/lib comes up. Just a few others I know about. > >> > >>> And then: > >>> > >>> # delete-old - Delete obsolete directories/files/libraries. > >>> # delete-old-dirs - Delete obsolete directories. > >>> # delete-old-files - Delete obsolete files. > >>> # delete-old-libs - Delete obsolete libraries. > >>> > >>> See the comment header of /usr/src/Makefile for more information > >>> (and how those targets fit the recommended updating procedure, > >>> listed a few lines later). > >>> > >>> Generally speaking: As long as no program is linked against those > >>> files, and no program requires them, they can be deleted. This > >>> statement highly depends on which programs you have installed > >>> and what they are linked against. :-) > >> > >> Thank you. Still wonder why they are so many and where the came from in the first place. > > > > They have been installed by the OS (from the initial installation > > media or subsequent update processes), as the /usr/lib directory > > is reserved for OS files (like /usr/local/lib is for 3rd party > > libraries). > > > > > > > >> And, they are all .a files, except for libc++.so and libc.so. > >> > >> I added NO_PROFILE=true to /etc/make.conf a while back. Is that relevant? > > > > Hmmm... I always thought that would be the default (no profiling libs > > being built and installed). But according to "man src.conf", the > > setting's name is WITHOUT_PROFILE, not NO_PROFILE. > > Hmm. I forgot about src.conf, I got: > > cat /etc/src.conf > WITHOUT_BLUETOOTH=yes > WITHOUT_FLOPPY=yes > WITHOUT_IPFW=yes > WITHOUT_IPFILTER=yes > > That may explain why _some_ libs are not being built and installed. > But still, more than 100 .a files with old dates. Doesn’t make sense to me at all. In this case, a good idea would be to move the old libraries out of /usr/lib (for example into a newly created /usr/lib.old directory) and checking if any application in use produces an error. In that case, the required library could be restored. If no further error appears - forget about those libraries. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jan 5 03:52:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98655A61B1E for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 03:52:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B31413D4 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 03:52:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ppp14-2-92-61.lns21.adl6.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([14.2.92.61]) by ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 05 Jan 2016 14:17:32 +1030 Subject: Re: Safe to delete old files in /usr/lib? To: Polytropon , Markus Edemalm References: <20160104181211.76907a30.freebsd@edvax.de> <20160104185245.5ca2e4f1.freebsd@edvax.de> <20160104203418.aee8df91.freebsd@edvax.de> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Shane Ambler Message-ID: <568B3CD2.8030708@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:17:30 +1030 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160104203418.aee8df91.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 03:52:42 -0000 On 05/01/2016 06:04, Polytropon wrote: > On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:18:02 +0100, Markus Edemalm wrote: >>> 4 jan. 2016 kl. 18:52 skrev Polytropon : >>> >>> On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:28:14 +0100, Markus Edemalm wrote: >>>>> 4 jan. 2016 kl. 18:12 skrev Polytropon : >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:06:00 +0100, Markus Edemalm wrote: >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>> My system was first installed as 10.0-RELEASE. I have >>>>>> sinceupgraded to 10.1, 10.1-STABLE, 10.2-RELEASE and is now >>>>>> at 10.2-RELEASE-p8. >>>>>> I’ve rebuild from source and followed the steps in the >>>>>> handbook. Everything is fine… but: >>>>>> >>>>>> I see many files in /usr/lib with old dates, apparently >>>>>> they are no longer installed during upgrades. Did you clear out /usr/obj With the right modifications dates, a binary doesn't need to be rebuilt While I think make buildworld should clean it out, some files may get missed. >>>>>> My /etc/make.conf looks like this: >>>>>> >>>>>> NO_PROFILE=true >>>>>> WITHOUT_X11=yes >>>>>> >>>>>> Today, January the 4th, I upgraded to -p8. The newly >>>>>> installedfiles has todays date, i.e ”Jan 4”. >>>>>> If I do: >>>>>> >>>>>> ls -lF /usr/lib | grep -v 'Jan 4' | awk {'print $9'} >>>>>> >>>>>> …I get the following list of (obsolete?) files and folders with older dates. >>>> And, they are all .a files, except for libc++.so and libc.so. >>>> >>>> I added NO_PROFILE=true to /etc/make.conf a while back. Is that relevant? >>> >>> Hmmm... I always thought that would be the default (no profiling libs >>> being built and installed). But according to "man src.conf", the >>> setting's name is WITHOUT_PROFILE, not NO_PROFILE. >> >> Hmm. I forgot about src.conf, I got: >> >> cat /etc/src.conf >> WITHOUT_BLUETOOTH=yes >> WITHOUT_FLOPPY=yes >> WITHOUT_IPFW=yes >> WITHOUT_IPFILTER=yes >> >> That may explain why _some_ libs are not being built and installed. >> But still, more than 100 .a files with old dates. Doesn’t make sense to me at all. > > In this case, a good idea would be to move the old libraries out > of /usr/lib (for example into a newly created /usr/lib.old directory) > and checking if any application in use produces an error. In that > case, the required library could be restored. If no further error > appears - forget about those libraries. :-) .a files should be copied into the final binary, so removing .a files won't break anything that is already built, but the next make could fail with a missing library at link time. I am running 10-stable and run make delete-old after upgrades - ls /usr/lib/*.a | wc -l 292 ls /usr/lib/*.so | wc -l 162 find /usr/lib -type l -name "*.a" | wc -l 22 I do seem to have a few old libs find /usr/lib -not -newermt "2 weeks ago" | wc -l 19 Downloading base.txz for 10.2-RELEASE - ls usr/lib/*.a | wc -l 287 ls usr/lib/*.so | wc -l 162 -- FreeBSD - the place to B...Software Developing Shane Ambler From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jan 5 08:06:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16751A61752; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 08:06:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D30CA1367; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 08:05:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from [89.204.138.201] (helo=localhost.unixarea.de) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1aGMcs-0000U5-HB; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 09:05:55 +0100 Received: from localhost.my.domain (c720-r285885-amd64 [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.unixarea.de (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPS id u0585pbu002377 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 5 Jan 2016 09:05:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.15.2/8.14.9/Submit) id u0585nxe002376; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 09:05:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 09:05:49 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: perl@FreeBSD.org Subject: small issue in port databases/p5-GDBM Message-ID: <20160105080549.GA2330@c720-r285885-amd64> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, perl@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r285885 (amd64) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 89.204.138.201 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 08:06:00 -0000 Hello, I need the above port to build a small Ddbm database and it seems that there is a small issue; it can be triggered with this perl code: #!/usr/local/bin/perl require GDBM_File; which gives: $ ./test.pl String found where operator expected at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/mach/5.20/GDBM_File.pm line 74, near "XSLoader::load 'GDBM_File'" (Do you need to predeclare XSLoader::load?) syntax error at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/mach/5.20/GDBM_File.pm line 75, near "XSLoader::load 'GDBM_File'" Compilation failed in require at ./test.pl line 3. the mentioned line in GDBM_File.pm is: XSLoader::load 'GDBM_File', $VERSION; If one adds a line of use XSLoader; XSLoader::load 'GDBM_File', $VERSION; it works fine. I'm not a perl expert (and not subscribed to perl@FreeBSD.org) and don't know if this is the right fix. Should I file a bugzilla issue? This is with ports from head of December, 30. matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ guru@unixarea.de, 🌐 http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jan 5 11:00:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7732DA61B45 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:00:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 387321838 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:00:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-21-51.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.21.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AAB53CDA0; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 12:00:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id u05B0dsr002113; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 12:00:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 12:00:39 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Shane Ambler Cc: Markus Edemalm , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Safe to delete old files in /usr/lib? Message-Id: <20160105120039.77065770.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <568B3CD2.8030708@ShaneWare.Biz> References: <20160104181211.76907a30.freebsd@edvax.de> <20160104185245.5ca2e4f1.freebsd@edvax.de> <20160104203418.aee8df91.freebsd@edvax.de> <568B3CD2.8030708@ShaneWare.Biz> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 11:00:44 -0000 On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:17:30 +1030, Shane Ambler wrote: > On 05/01/2016 06:04, Polytropon wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:18:02 +0100, Markus Edemalm wrote: > >>> 4 jan. 2016 kl. 18:52 skrev Polytropon : > >>> > >>> On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:28:14 +0100, Markus Edemalm wrote: > >>>>> 4 jan. 2016 kl. 18:12 skrev Polytropon : > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:06:00 +0100, Markus Edemalm wrote: > >>>>>> Hello, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> My system was first installed as 10.0-RELEASE. I have > >>>>>> sinceupgraded to 10.1, 10.1-STABLE, 10.2-RELEASE and is now > >>>>>> at 10.2-RELEASE-p8. > >>>>>> I’ve rebuild from source and followed the steps in the > >>>>>> handbook. Everything is fine… but: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I see many files in /usr/lib with old dates, apparently > >>>>>> they are > no longer installed during upgrades. > > Did you clear out /usr/obj > With the right modifications dates, a binary doesn't need to be rebuilt Maybe the installation process has copied files from /usr/obj which have been left there from a previous build? > .a files should be copied into the final binary, so removing .a files > won't break anything that is already built, but the next make could > fail with a missing library at link time. Usually this should not happen. The build process happens "inside" the generated /usr/obj subtree ("self-contained"), at least regarding libraries to link against. > I am running 10-stable and run make delete-old after upgrades - > > ls /usr/lib/*.a | wc -l > 292 > ls /usr/lib/*.so | wc -l > 162 > > find /usr/lib -type l -name "*.a" | wc -l > 22 > > I do seem to have a few old libs > > find /usr/lib -not -newermt "2 weeks ago" | wc -l > 19 > > Downloading base.txz for 10.2-RELEASE - > > ls usr/lib/*.a | wc -l > 287 > ls usr/lib/*.so | wc -l > 162 So this is the relevant clue: Those files came from the initial installation. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jan 5 11:05:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E694AA61E86 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:05:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6DF31B73 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:05:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id b14so23317415wmb.1 for ; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 03:05:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bris-ac-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to; bh=8GdJO0QsB1/tEYwIptvzRsr6/pX0mAwDclwXpPFoWIo=; b=WQEsq3ZxjllV8LXSPAmHa3bGzV72m2S3tNxs/9lmmfU3SUqIBG6mabZOPIhMz+q3Hc JhKBlJ2Yr6jekJPTd0VpXS4+pw/JCCI7GRJ4GP6lOSMKYfkTKcvA0CIOHhwH/EbhyGGR qFJHz8B8GpcJWsyF4aUj166kbFNcVcpMwz/4uH0WxLC8b/A125eOPoNxwW08fBuB1550 gb8Tq973NrBI50viBTWiMvyUbzUpR3gH/HQskyRPGRvWmWYEczw0dJzdO1KmKBo3aWjF 8qCtW/d1eIKl3mtpPXVRix4P2uloqyB2oOxdGkJMFckS3/AHFwRAd3lfeMyN9yNBehAL /ioA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to; bh=8GdJO0QsB1/tEYwIptvzRsr6/pX0mAwDclwXpPFoWIo=; b=bgEPzWuhOAP50yMzBhtwDW66G21Su6vo8cScmAj1ypz3OLuEzEDw4mnkEKuOPneC3J y4lf2BY8PYx4SIacppGKJs3qUF/AZQwDrAxzoe2zPDf5moOH4EjoO3TAzfb4h/Sj0oWk beJrBHpvMSyreRR2Qa6LNIgAj12SPKFoGiShr1UQk0DBuSgcl9i1fCm3tSkOS4eipaKt XeiIw+7/1YcQuNBixxwJ3LAmz1k712oW1Y6imnNyH4ogXyjN+KRrQRlEKLEhjgLWyEdm Xx+Qe13p7TlU9TzmYqmhD1OgnpFEzhooHeBMyj9rfrQ6rgNRQT3vLCvEnwF0Umiwe3+z S7hg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQks19mrtv2NngG4w5gPazo1x7moCqLXqD6B/q8v+QkjJ0EfqWUYdxcpL1Xz+AuDMnBOITO1MGU+POGRl72BqTkdHN8uRg== X-Received: by 10.194.9.98 with SMTP id y2mr39771048wja.105.1451991907885; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 03:05:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.170.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c203sm3009139wmd.5.2016.01.05.03.05.07 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Jan 2016 03:05:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 03:05:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:05:06 GMT Received: from mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u05B56QV065180 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:05:06 GMT (envelope-from mexas@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u05B56gg065179 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:05:06 GMT (envelope-from mexas) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201601051105.u05B56gg065179@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: sendmail config help Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 11:05:10 -0000 Hi I cannot figure out how to set up sendmail to receive mail. I've a server with a static IP. The server runs 9.3-RELEASE-p13 with default sendmail. I registered a domain name, say z.com, and set up DNS and MX. The server has user joe. I want email sent to joe@z.com to be delivered to joe's mailbox on my server. How do I configure sendmail for this? I've looked through a lot of (sometimes confusing or conflicting) docs, at sendmail.org, the FreeBSD handbook and many more online. Still not sure. The best I can get is: 553 5.3.5 z.com. config error: mail loops back to me (MX problem?) 554 5.3.5 Local configuration error My questions: 1. Do I even need MX for this simple setup? Some sources suggest that MX is need when multiple domains are involved. Here I have only a single domain on a single server, with a single IP. Do I still need MX? 2. Is virtual hosting relevant? I followed this guide: http://www.sendmail.com/sm/open_source/tips/virtual_hosting/ and set up /etc/mail/virtusertable as: joe@z.com joe and made a map of it with makemap hash virtusertable < virtusertable Is virtusertable relevant at all? 3. To test, I've been sending email to joe@z.com from a gmail account. I had to add: # cat /etc/mail/relay-domains google.com # To even get though the host. Othewise I was getting: 550 5.7.1 ... Relaying denied Thanks Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jan 5 11:29:48 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70684A62A61 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:29:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0076118C7 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:29:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from zero-gravitas.local ([IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:2ef0:eeff:fe24:fa38]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u05BTgpE001103 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:29:43 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=infracaninophile.co.uk DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk u05BTgpE001103 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1451993383; bh=bNT+H4wZJqu+qi7DVHSnolXw1sx7XfT2Mei2y+RT1js=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; z=Subject:=20Re:=20sendmail=20config=20help|To:=20freebsd-questions @freebsd.org|References:=20<201601051105.u05B56gg065179@mech-as222 .men.bris.ac.uk>|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman=20|Date:=20Tue,=205=20Jan=202016=2011:29:34=20+0000|In-Re ply-To:=20<201601051105.u05B56gg065179@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk>; b=IMxc6MankwM0elAQp5izlzUrq/I3LMmqh5ToPZu4YWXX/82HtA8AlgR/ViVdxf8H3 gV0RWyA1RGWTilYtLX/Un1A3DvTpPExPEZIbQ79K5FE1yzYsa4P4K/YObNbPv/KVL/ /ebLQYsDaWXMlYonMhCd5bb0kl1Vvo6ZgSD9Epak= X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:2ef0:eeff:fe24:fa38] claimed to be zero-gravitas.local Subject: Re: sendmail config help To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201601051105.u05B56gg065179@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> From: Matthew Seaman X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <568BA91E.20208@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:29:34 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201601051105.u05B56gg065179@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Cmd0jRDhLXCmpGxjJ0WSiwq84rv3EiR8r" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 11:29:48 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --Cmd0jRDhLXCmpGxjJ0WSiwq84rv3EiR8r Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2016/01/05 11:05, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > The best I can get is: >=20 > 553 5.3.5 z.com. config error: mail loops back to me (MX problem?) > 554 5.3.5 Local configuration error This indicates that although the MX records in the DNS point to your machine to handle the e-mail for z.com, the machine's sendmail configuration doesn't state that it should handle the final delivery for z.com messages. You need to add z.com to the file /etc/mail/local-host-names and then bounce sendmail. What this does is add z.com to sendmail's class w -- the list of addresses which this instance of sendmail 'owns.' > My questions: >=20 > 1. Do I even need MX for this simple setup? > Some sources suggest that MX is need when > multiple domains are involved. Here I have > only a single domain on a single server, > with a single IP. Do I still need MX? No, you can get away without an MX record, but on the whole it's better to have one. Otherwise you'll need to add an A record at the zone apex for z.com pointing at your mail server. Personally, I'd name the mail server as 'smtp.z.com' and use an MX record to direct the mail to it. That's pretty standard and it will help avoid your messages getting classed as spam. > 2. Is virtual hosting relevant? > I followed this guide: >=20 > http://www.sendmail.com/sm/open_source/tips/virtual_hosting/ >=20 > and set up /etc/mail/virtusertable as: >=20 > joe@z.com joe >=20 > and made a map of it with >=20 > makemap hash virtusertable < virtusertable >=20 > Is virtusertable relevant at all? virtusertable is strictly an optional extra here. Essentially it exists so that you can receive email for an address like 'fred.bloggs@z.com' and map that only the local unix account name 'fred' for delivery. There are a bunch of other things you can do with virtusertable -- it is most useful when your sendmail instance is handling e-mail for a number of different domains[*], and you can use it to implement a 'catch-all' address, but the name mapping stuff is probably what it's most used for. See genericstable for the way to do the converse of that: send out using a full name rather than a unix userid. You shouldn't need any entries in relay-domains with this setup: if your machine is the final delivery point for email to ...@z.com then by definition you aren't relaying that anywhere else. Cheers, Matthew [*] Although my advice here is 'if you want to handle anything more complicated than a low traffic server for a single domain then ditch sendmail and use postfix instead' --Cmd0jRDhLXCmpGxjJ0WSiwq84rv3EiR8r Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJWi6kmXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnzDgP/AtsFNY7D5gOrFEOLbhs7awx D9KnslxYKvQEtPB0vGvE0y1sjyqQiLaurOOyHbLxylLO9thWLUTEraMPRU0pzC2l xhWEYmBQiw8ietj2BYm1nStiTTL7ByOT5AzMOfaIno33LJXTaPdF+FdNKYcRplNN n7jBeYIanxVCVRMf6lwPViI2hZGWt+Jbq/vhWLb0dlrSIL+xoU68b3j3QAfekIk+ RB2TvnUOZM6m3NlUGc9GGGaCpYUZYQ39bv5B6YdcYslaId+aCAYqUnQTrOCbv0xS cDezPgSFbvjxWm1nmS57+rYMZuTHOst/eF5qhAgu+00Ic2w7WowJ17Bzhl/SR0zE HjLqe2FMcH/z4Dh7r7CxDlSQFkuS6KwN6Hk/ZtUKcQYZiLxSyNXgqyGXLSbzG2WW +t4n48rGWuvWRmCmMVXEimBSFw1SLrYv9ktqr0z7rsTV6P0Ux/pqtI+R57OOSyQS U4rd4xyg8wnwTZ0eEpq61BfPDCUc9+LQZ+DKHcT7XYiO62R6rrqh/omXUHVI8iAN kq9xjUFA1LlBOekuNuouoppoIb62URiTyVHHGygUTZs9nq1Y/qxIhh/AxR4wMgau J/px195fO5BDptQkglUyCYeJ8kj9C21Dh8zt5Z9ts2EK8SSY+wILY65xT2j2sZup h+6S+AJkX385Eca9EmO/ =VK4N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Cmd0jRDhLXCmpGxjJ0WSiwq84rv3EiR8r-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jan 5 12:33:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DF5DA63898 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 12:33:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shahinhasanov@hotmail.com) Received: from DUB004-OMC4S26.hotmail.com (dub004-omc4s26.hotmail.com [157.55.2.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C204135B for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 12:33:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shahinhasanov@hotmail.com) Received: from DUB127-W87 ([157.55.2.71]) by DUB004-OMC4S26.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Tue, 5 Jan 2016 04:32:22 -0800 X-TMN: [ZPh7Kc2CuazHveL4hijYdUGW5pJ3OU/G] X-Originating-Email: [shahinhasanov@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Shahin Hasanov To: FREEBSD_QUESTION Subject: There is problem during dump/restore. Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 16:32:22 +0400 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jan 2016 12:32:22.0764 (UTC) FILETIME=[205662C0:01D147B5] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 12:33:34 -0000 =20 I had server FreeBSD 10.1 I make dump: dump -0 -a -f /home/USER/node2.dump /dev/da0p2 When I trying # restore -r -f /mnt/node2.dump I was gave error message=20 cannot find directory inode 10032011 abort? [yn] n cannot find directory inode 10032013 abort? [yn] n = From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jan 5 13:22:22 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4CCA628A4 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 13:22:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F01641D9C for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 13:22:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from zero-gravitas.local ([IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:2ef0:eeff:fe24:fa38]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u05DMBgP003362 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 13:22:11 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk u05DMBgP003362 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/u05DMBgP003362; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:2ef0:eeff:fe24:fa38] claimed to be zero-gravitas.local Subject: Re: There is problem during dump/restore. To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: Matthew Seaman X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <568BC37C.2010903@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 13:22:04 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fulRBxi0rNkRL7oT6u7S7JNRv5aJpOAf2" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 13:22:22 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --fulRBxi0rNkRL7oT6u7S7JNRv5aJpOAf2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2016/01/05 12:32, Shahin Hasanov wrote: > =20 > I had server FreeBSD 10.1 > I make dump: >=20 > dump -0 -a -f /home/USER/node2.dump /dev/da0p2 >=20 > When I trying > # restore -r -f /mnt/node2.dump >=20 > I was gave error message=20 >=20 > cannot find directory inode 10032011 > abort? [yn] n > cannot find directory inode 10032013 > abort? [yn] n How big is the filesystem you're restoring to compared to the one you dumped? You did create a new, empty filesystem to restore into, mount that and change directory to the mount point before attempting the restore? And you didn't copy the dumpfile 'node2.dump' into the filesystem you're attempting to restore to -- 'restore -r' wants a brand new, empty filesystem initially? Are you using SU+J (Soft Updates + Journalling) on the newly created filesystem? While that's the default for the system installer nowadays, it doesn't actually play well with dump/restore. Cheers, Matthew --fulRBxi0rNkRL7oT6u7S7JNRv5aJpOAf2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJWi8ODXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnfmEP/jGYQkKHw19GbHswF0HTeEvL w4TnAhjKUtaDuoJ5d1QQazIfJPADdgB7o91Zegxq5tfemGBTfui+z32LOHPX0fvQ UfQ1NFvx0FXJ4awkxbD0oLkly3PnzQLa3ANFMo7WkvlYyE6xGG/Uli5pGRAanYHG GQBxitP/OkN9DC2cBQaqQGtzyYPt/Ek32dZ9lBcr8oHynnWe6U+qsjtYFgMJhZ0q Ap5vjLyCdyAGgUHSmXkG6srgKj0tkx4P2pC+1pxPTu8PbPL0mUswEmzxhj2gE/VU Ba+VDHJDfrHTFpVDjeeFZRUyd98sAqgWlp2ghXPC0xrjwZo+r5cWvNxpoLuu2i8y mIy4YYVyT0mQC1aVav/aoeMtJWkDRMD3p8AJi3gB0ALoeGPBkYaPeTckVkHRHq4u 8mXnfT2gO4a57MdnXNrMoQvT8GoRqOqc6y0TBzRoszMqwLkX3Z6MyQdrKhr9Zg+B dvurCH6GKjDxQBoQDSmkVyUyzZhz7+BjcRdXi25ezhNVWH+xrSzNKgsyV2boGRD9 TBtuMfNgaND84tgx+M8h685kmKmmo0vnkZP8oQid6BmQXJsPPSqx8YajL9L88A+6 C2moVmKrHvNyRg+Gc8H6smYi4x8/Aa+qsveXuLihfDKjif4TkJGxv1WbfvZMe5Lt u/1oGmK7ZngPTOhcYrLq =1bil -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fulRBxi0rNkRL7oT6u7S7JNRv5aJpOAf2-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jan 5 13:40:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE46A6105C for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 13:40:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shahinhasanov@hotmail.com) Received: from DUB004-OMC1S35.hotmail.com (dub004-omc1s35.hotmail.com [157.55.0.234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AF3D179C; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 13:40:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shahinhasanov@hotmail.com) Received: from DUB127-W44 ([157.55.0.238]) by DUB004-OMC1S35.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Tue, 5 Jan 2016 05:39:16 -0800 X-TMN: [oSaUMc4EaxSiEezT+zQ+2W46zfHEs15M] X-Originating-Email: [shahinhasanov@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Shahin Hasanov To: Matthew Seaman , FREEBSD_QUESTION Subject: RE: There is problem during dump/restore. Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 17:39:16 +0400 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <568BC37C.2010903@FreeBSD.org> References: , <568BC37C.2010903@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jan 2016 13:39:16.0246 (UTC) FILETIME=[788F2360:01D147BE] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 13:40:26 -0000 Thank you Matthew=2C I have two HDD da0=2Cda1 da0 is 147GB - ufs da1 is 1.1TB - zfs I did like bellow: =20 # zpool import -f HASTPOOL # mount -t zfs HASTPOOL /mnt # newfs /dev/da0p2 # mkdir /mnt/test=20 # mount /dev/da0p2 /mnt/test # mkdir /mnt/tmp # export TMPDIR=3D/mnt/tmp # cd /mnt/test # restore -r -f /mnt/NODE_2.dump=20 =20 When it gave message I type 'n' cannot find directory inode 10032011 > > abort? [yn] n > > cannot find directory inode 10032013 > > abort? [yn] n # cd .. # umount /mnt/test # fsck -t ufs -p /dev/da0p2 # reboot =20 It seems it works =20 Is it normal? =20 =20 Best regards Shahin Hasanov =20 =20 =20 > Subject: Re: There is problem during dump/restore. > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > From: matthew@FreeBSD.org > Date: Tue=2C 5 Jan 2016 13:22:04 +0000 >=20 > On 2016/01/05 12:32=2C Shahin Hasanov wrote: > > =20 > > I had server FreeBSD 10.1 > > I make dump: > >=20 > > dump -0 -a -f /home/USER/node2.dump /dev/da0p2 > >=20 > > When I trying > > # restore -r -f /mnt/node2.dump > >=20 > > I was gave error message=20 > >=20 > > cannot find directory inode 10032011 > > abort? [yn] n > > cannot find directory inode 10032013 > > abort? [yn] n >=20 > How big is the filesystem you're restoring to compared to the one you > dumped? >=20 > You did create a new=2C empty filesystem to restore into=2C mount that an= d > change directory to the mount point before attempting the restore? And > you didn't copy the dumpfile 'node2.dump' into the filesystem you're > attempting to restore to -- 'restore -r' wants a brand new=2C empty > filesystem initially? >=20 > Are you using SU+J (Soft Updates + Journalling) on the newly created > filesystem? While that's the default for the system installer nowadays= =2C > it doesn't actually play well with dump/restore. >=20 > Cheers=2C >=20 > Matthew >=20 >=20 >=20 = From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jan 5 14:13:47 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6EBFA61F2A for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:13:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from mail-wm0-x22e.google.com (mail-wm0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55BF31BE8 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:13:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: by mail-wm0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id l65so24307320wmf.1 for ; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 06:13:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bris-ac-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=Os6g61z10n87uS6M6SuO/uN6BDX+cZHu1IUVm/8/baU=; b=wp6QtE0pPFK/h6tw6vJ95PS4XiFz2VUIt34TdFiqQMkTqpZZcUwKmcvHIhVTkUeTEA Nrn1Pex1CTVEZ88loTVs7xRjVr/iY0cjziKfKJc56k++/J4OlMzD2XABHNiTomsZ3224 Z25MGFoQbVV102uQ0vJDC6YG52Rh1BOw8zjoox6smJIryp9oHTjRub2bz0UtCbmkL8KH v3ZFbYyPBUfS7GdQSZWQU8t1PPk1VfjXn39q3uI72MoJP9LGggiOiXovRTbFvy4fI9Td UpQIEYDdAeAO4e8Yan0P79D6J19X7hg9OxMsWEyFgB1Akji62jqWDgGXQVmgquiC7Gjv i5uA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to :in-reply-to; bh=Os6g61z10n87uS6M6SuO/uN6BDX+cZHu1IUVm/8/baU=; b=ZathHgk2HkEsu9M0mNUOKcb1Uf2nfSLaV8y1rwLbVDSTkJw+xI/0tjLmQoq1J7q9VE CRDALbxkDANtjZTZG5BMwfCes/AbWPKR4BR11P6OQqWt3n95QhfXSqC0bi/yzGObfPQB QM9NfmfVbrTnnZaFmY3ASl/LU/Zz7V/Lr/1IFbGQNCdLG0+gtlEk4rhxd2AKbsxbd1Dk wP9irjrkpJ4BkjCPoMwFrrnBEgTzi2iptZXWgGAkDfbRIeda/m16Q00H9rKHb6B3rfrA y5paotd90N6nieKU/T6XrKZ9ERNhMTR3LBsXTWdgvBCfKMIy2OgasquCeoeMS9u4wUb5 zr+A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmixU0Y7L3Ufm8H47WcVhBVfDCLaTmKq8rUs7o/yF087HyTFy1heznXInzed8hrLkAxjMXhWUSUeHPhyGlrUXeuJ+HodQ== X-Received: by 10.28.228.87 with SMTP id b84mr4626585wmh.36.1452003225715; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 06:13:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.170.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ft4sm91016484wjb.37.2016.01.05.06.13.44 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Jan 2016 06:13:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 06:13:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:13:44 GMT Received: from mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u05EDiQS065868; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:13:44 GMT (envelope-from mexas@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u05EDiRX065867; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:13:44 GMT (envelope-from mexas) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201601051413.u05EDiRX065867@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: sendmail config help Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk In-Reply-To: <568BA91E.20208@infracaninophile.co.uk> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 14:13:47 -0000 >From: Matthew Seaman > >On 2016/01/05 11:05, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >> The best I can get is: >>=20 >> 553 5.3.5 z.com. config error: mail loops back to me (MX problem?) >> 554 5.3.5 Local configuration error > >This indicates that although the MX records in the DNS point to your >machine to handle the e-mail for z.com, the machine's sendmail >configuration doesn't state that it should handle the final delivery for >z.com messages. > >You need to add z.com to the file /etc/mail/local-host-names and then >bounce sendmail. What this does is add z.com to sendmail's class w -- >the list of addresses which this instance of sendmail 'owns.' Matthew, thank you, that solved the problem. >Personally, I'd name the mail server as 'smtp.z.com' and use an MX >record to direct the mail to it. That's pretty standard and it will >help avoid your messages getting classed as spam. Sorry, I don't understand this fully. After I set smtp.z.com in MX record, do I need to change anything on the server side for this to work? I naively thought that using smtp.z.com makes sense only if it refers to physically diffent host than z.com. Am I wrong? Sorry for taking your time. Perhaps you can point to a good background reading on this. I'm lost in multitude of advice on the net. Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jan 5 14:19:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F98A6212C for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:19:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B3201E48 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:19:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from liminal.local (liminal.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3636:3bff:fed4:b0d6]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u05EJjXE004480 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:19:45 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk u05EJjXE004480 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/u05EJjXE004480; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host liminal.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3636:3bff:fed4:b0d6] claimed to be liminal.local Subject: Re: There is problem during dump/restore. To: Shahin Hasanov , FREEBSD_QUESTION References: <568BC37C.2010903@FreeBSD.org> From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <568BD0FB.5020303@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:19:39 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Dbp3P1Xv8j1tF42n9CkcTDgQxQ39CcnV9" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 14:19:54 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --Dbp3P1Xv8j1tF42n9CkcTDgQxQ39CcnV9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/01/2016 13:39, Shahin Hasanov wrote: > Thank you Matthew, > I have two HDD da0,da1 > da0 is 147GB - ufs > da1 is 1.1TB - zfs Ah -- there is your problem. dump/restore only works with UFS. However, if what you want to do is copy a directory heirarchy from one place to another preserving ownership and permissions and so forth, then there are very many ways to do that. Two suggestions: 1) Using stuff from the base system only: # cd /src/dir # tar -cf - . | ( cd /dest/dir ; tar -xvf - ) 2) Using rsync(1) from ports: # rsync -avx /src/dir/ /dest/dir/ (Note the trailing slashes on the directory paths -- they're important with rsync.) Cheers, Matthew --Dbp3P1Xv8j1tF42n9CkcTDgQxQ39CcnV9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJWi9EBXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATvHgQAIh3D8GfegtyG8GLLfGtJSgo ZYF2VbEfq69dOsZYeCXU+HCZlkrvOXN62NGdxlylKlK7Nt5Fp/d9axqhKuuuBKwj SroVSObZ0FmBZ5BQwB74lV6RFVnOHw6Z60md4Bh0PqhspoAYjmnQS8zEPfk8PZYH SciViOkdFufe0ym4f8KymJDIvepnH+L8dIvqSbSl6y/Kd5goqf5tUT4g8Q+KD40K UocZY+TzSDv76hjkgYI4+vbFpIL3Zt7CYsl+4ImsgE80XE/MPXxlYHDgWUoYENh/ S+Htl6C7GADPGywzrWNm5td5HTTAZ6c8DMp3qzrknpoan6ChNdHhqEjn68Gch8VB yJf/tbRnyifcmbgHyZWIYKymLyALb9om5rw1atbpEILz5x7ItQ6TY7zm/mBq8m1d 2JXTUUDsB6j7hHsAbStTdFvSzvquqltO0gDPN93kqnssgnXnfX8F4xX2GELgAU1q V0NGJna5+uqigc65Kd4L30bbyJ6X0R5DdIDXcsngGkiWKee+ed7kB9fTQGb7/HGo yykQCJ2hEuG3McWAeEU8mtyeTVbGXPuzz6RX13tOu5Vk6htimXaTaCg9kCk6OU1T Bl8AwOik6A5MqPK3wsn/+2JWkb2UxZdM8HTv89gLyM1f/4nA5EosJGsGPmUkUzoe RozMUlV+HkEqn4Ez4yOb =25oz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Dbp3P1Xv8j1tF42n9CkcTDgQxQ39CcnV9-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jan 5 14:24:52 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A29A62412 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:24:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vsasjason@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x232.google.com (mail-wm0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 250D512D8; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:24:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vsasjason@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x232.google.com with SMTP id l65so24699231wmf.1; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 06:24:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=tdFnU6vpCiYjnqHS86sTAakTLx6gDc5a9pfA6dXZ1pA=; b=l/t+aiaeguQLrS02rqcM8ZPPfpzZLGSDPZqPBIZMs4xABhs94w5iOusai2WualoXNj sN/kWZDiSwMvkzFCcWmzBaDq17qHLKtyIlecKG7hEdOPzRtalxrJ51PDxccH4FsMxEBu yIt2eUhYLzUDqRlX/4Q9hauc7TzsgHKENFHvB4mKLBrxsYhb+E259ZbXvolHgx3EzHnb UDwcQBjnGS6BI1xoWXTUmjpZBD/LowFbslyCp1aW+8X8r4nBl1wWk6Fo7QYtqbpKi+rk DfdMZh+O2ehtABvk0U0UfJvm6DNd8BXNYYDhoJKO4/v5fX5giKDhe607QIkYknhiwHwx jzjw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.54.78 with SMTP id d75mr4549049wma.6.1452003890534; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 06:24:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.76.207 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 06:24:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.76.207 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 06:24:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <568BD0FB.5020303@FreeBSD.org> References: <568BC37C.2010903@FreeBSD.org> <568BD0FB.5020303@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 17:24:50 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: There is problem during dump/restore. From: Anton Sayetsky To: Matthew Seaman Cc: FreeBSD Questions , Shahin Hasanov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 14:24:52 -0000 5 =D1=8F=D0=BD=D0=B2. 2016 =D0=B3. 16:20 =D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=BB=D1=8C=D0=B7=D0= =BE=D0=B2=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8C "Matthew Seaman" =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB: > > On 05/01/2016 13:39, Shahin Hasanov wrote: > > Thank you Matthew, > > I have two HDD da0,da1 > > da0 is 147GB - ufs > > da1 is 1.1TB - zfs > > Ah -- there is your problem. dump/restore only works with UFS. > > However, if what you want to do is copy a directory heirarchy from one > place to another preserving ownership and permissions and so forth, then > there are very many ways to do that. > > Two suggestions: > > 1) Using stuff from the base system only: > > # cd /src/dir > # tar -cf - . | ( cd /dest/dir ; tar -xvf - ) I think that's better to replace above 2 commands with one following: # tar cf - -C /src/dir . | tar xf -C /dest/dir - > 2) Using rsync(1) from ports: > > # rsync -avx /src/dir/ /dest/dir/ > > (Note the trailing slashes on the directory paths -- they're From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jan 5 14:24:57 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 520FAA6242A for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:24:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no", Issuer "Fagskolen i Gj??vik" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C588B12F4; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:24:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u05EOkB8033320 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 5 Jan 2016 15:24:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u05EOkcL033317; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 15:24:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 15:24:46 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no To: Matthew Seaman cc: Shahin Hasanov , FREEBSD_QUESTION Subject: Re: There is problem during dump/restore. In-Reply-To: <568BD0FB.5020303@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <568BC37C.2010903@FreeBSD.org> <568BD0FB.5020303@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, AWL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail.fig.ol.no Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 14:24:57 -0000 On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:19-0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 05/01/2016 13:39, Shahin Hasanov wrote: > > Thank you Matthew, > > I have two HDD da0,da1 > > da0 is 147GB - ufs > > da1 is 1.1TB - zfs > > Ah -- there is your problem. dump/restore only works with UFS. It's UFS. Read the post again. /dev/da0p2 aka /mnt/test, is a brand new UFS. > However, if what you want to do is copy a directory heirarchy from one > place to another preserving ownership and permissions and so forth, then > there are very many ways to do that. > > Two suggestions: > > 1) Using stuff from the base system only: > > # cd /src/dir > # tar -cf - . | ( cd /dest/dir ; tar -xvf - ) > > 2) Using rsync(1) from ports: > > # rsync -avx /src/dir/ /dest/dir/ > > (Note the trailing slashes on the directory paths -- they're > important with rsync.) > > Cheers, > > Matthew -- +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestl, | Trond Endrestl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jan 5 14:29:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE6BAA626A3 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:29:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michaelsprivate@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yk0-x22d.google.com (mail-yk0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4F961629 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:29:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michaelsprivate@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yk0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id x67so282490760ykd.2 for ; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 06:29:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=9PLQtJ0/c2Wag+fE50vNOxHXgC/wavsKULmgabRQpRE=; b=rDHC8gCI0wKAECe4pp6oEL8BL2bXJNNPM8kSgwuwL+/6FpUEIa1it+jSz7gA/D/h0Z kAz/YrgNDVOG/AEBANcEVpy+siErfEZybW/xy6xOdnszkjikHNXVou5wEen1TOwop3w/ EYgKZK2lWLLD23RnRLqkt1wZVoECzD56vPzP0c409ptdusyWQhfmgjpf2XSXRuNEnBLC QPhMRU38us7PCn5HFl68DUFERAnu8GXhFMDGbfIblapqF7BlXrAjOba2Cno2hg5CKQ8N QRGMDyJqEUAaFFg0HTlJ1pW7b663W7smRY8oA1L23Ck9pGfdEhqrDaZSiHYaMF1Xtc2u uvag== X-Received: by 10.129.27.13 with SMTP id b13mr64895773ywb.133.1452004188867; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 06:29:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.37.210.145 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 06:29:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Michael Schuster Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 15:29:29 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: There is problem during dump/restore. To: Shahin Hasanov Cc: FREEBSD_QUESTION Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 14:29:50 -0000 Hi, On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Shahin Hasanov wrote: > dump -0 -a -f /home/USER/node2.dump /dev/da0p2 > > When I trying > # restore -r -f /mnt/node2.dump > > I was gave error message > > cannot find directory inode 10032011 > abort? [yn] n > cannot find directory inode 10032013 > abort? [yn] n > Was there activity on this file system during the dump phase? Michael -- Michael Schuster http://recursiveramblings.wordpress.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jan 5 14:39:27 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2A27A62BD7 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:39:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E6341DA7 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:39:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from liminal.local (liminal.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3636:3bff:fed4:b0d6]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u05EdHfa004903 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:39:18 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk u05EdHfa004903 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/u05EdHfa004903; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host liminal.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3636:3bff:fed4:b0d6] claimed to be liminal.local Subject: Re: sendmail config help To: mexas@bris.ac.uk, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201601051413.u05EDiRX065867@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> From: Matthew Seaman X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <568BD595.6070500@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:39:17 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201601051413.u05EDiRX065867@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sNQbL5kvj4DwqOKC9s68qFucwcpXhAn46" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 14:39:27 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --sNQbL5kvj4DwqOKC9s68qFucwcpXhAn46 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/01/2016 14:13, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > Matthew, thank you, that solved the problem. Cool. >> >Personally, I'd name the mail server as 'smtp.z.com' and use an MX >> >record to direct the mail to it. That's pretty standard and it will >> >help avoid your messages getting classed as spam. > Sorry, I don't understand this fully. >=20 > After I set smtp.z.com in MX record, > do I need to change anything on the server side > for this to work? >=20 > I naively thought that using smtp.z.com makes > sense only if it refers to physically diffent > host than z.com. Am I wrong? Yes -- as I said, you /can/ do without an MX record if you want to. However, I recommend that you do always have an MX record: it basically makes it transparently obvious to people that might want to exchange e-mail with you that you intended for this host to handle SMTP traffic. In fact, even if your mail host uses just the domain as its hostname, I'd still have z.com. IN MX 0 z.com. Which looks entirely redundant, but the reason to have it is more social and reputational rather than technical. > Sorry for taking your time. > Perhaps you can point to a good background > reading on this. I'm lost in multitude of > advice on the net. Given you've an ac.uk address, try finding the O'Reilly Sendmail book in the library there. It's a bit of a doorstop, but a lot of it consists of enumerating various different options -- reference stuff, rather than instructional material. Not sure if it's still available to buy, but that is probably the best guide to Sendmail you'll find. For quick reference I find /usr/share/sendmail/cf/README is actually pretty good. Cheers, Matthew --sNQbL5kvj4DwqOKC9s68qFucwcpXhAn46 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJWi9WVXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATp/MQAKgxYTahRs8FxpEZyiMFthpV Uc7dqVC+sW+QKQ8pxoURhaefya9arG6Yz/gGJX+XkB8kuvTESYScZzg/TIeG+/t2 rNH+9TvMlji4aeQ7HpL15WsUeK/OHyZhhYIt6DOCnXWylxhdPq2MXavBe6PtLSbx rw4OAFdymwLf0VOxgaabSsR+HneDGzhtEtbJg0l1PdaqX63Zz6Si5y4Sr2/hn6Pu Spdy27QHJNTIWd/Lg3YqT+rW/m1UolkkJbAG2tvQ6Bh62wQDACT/yMlNxXtXKIFr OCcAzl/KQNIlfY2jk0vymFlblZ5VVe/YggeKV6yVnq0+IVVIrR631Bi1LcHkzjHx wGeheCbnaMnXgmeaNgqFIb009NQs1jrxoa0DjtgBwvxG1YUGJSilwh+xid6EfnbD HiTDFwmG3iYanZZFEho0BIzTFu5j+gpO8sK7zr566cB+EUcA7U96d5R5kyZMHj9z Zq8z4p5jNzVgPRY1qkrK+NzjhCrn6xWw9L3Bdq3AEIKy/NoEw7rvMl0NJo5v2kE1 6q3Nfc/IGTw3B6Hb8eGVO2q3NL4+MceCDG7KfimoflyWVjnghrUSuhFwVQliMtbc /FDf6N/NRtVe2uaX8N6LHkOyEx2MibCrqamqMKoHuSKCW7Puen+O6eB569aRhy3r TC0R/ZKRMvP8tE+6YsLm =lnqB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sNQbL5kvj4DwqOKC9s68qFucwcpXhAn46-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jan 5 15:13:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1084A63904 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 15:13:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80CEB1745 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 15:13:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id l65so26464947wmf.1 for ; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 07:13:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bris-ac-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=spa1jm/JTfk3iYiyCAqYDa58xpVYiT2Qf4w5PU9tNgo=; b=pMnJWo3VUxe9LT14IftAaAwUis/OSNUQzL7KxLJAWB7eeXOhrfrau/BrRNBIaBdgpJ jHoIUkLaxKMZjlay0A+4GVd5pFHqKDazREIjq6AMtH0RxuXOH/iQH3ju1VHc+3FDdMMq eNyCR+GdRkpxcdE40A3GF186f5CQeNfYauoZ3guCSQYoqv42b8M6AB+xtm9s2apGbeWH 2Oi7Kf8W8+64pwZy6m8jSWK2hKhXTwj7iffdQBSKRDcKxyPMDvpyELj+HIFdDy5jNOQI m8qMFZ0Xm7e2TL0EBOLrCDBvt1s2fTp+5JHIljjhofmXba5uPQqf2ZCqVmjzdxgol4SC IK9g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to :in-reply-to; bh=spa1jm/JTfk3iYiyCAqYDa58xpVYiT2Qf4w5PU9tNgo=; b=l7gLQFx77Q6QcV5mZ/tkqbtXIY8W0+JkBym92z/0j5Y9p2Dj6RaiOelJ7jIu7/05jX VKXehdeDfG8bxcC2289vqaKeKowQbVFp4HR7MdldKJYFifTjEgF+tEZjA+HblloEx3HG tbiq2Ph1/sk5o4hfLWei33RazLjCKqnmIhFOBaqYi/saZ+nRNPpAOunSzhLbwY8cv5YV 6/uIPWSuYMs/MUUOAKpn+8wW6FQaP7FeI8HgM4Rr3cwNVpEBUBAhOmcfSa7hePphzGfA eZsDubBwcENK3ozKYo7ddAam6Tkp5Xx45GJMCEiwoL8llSStTbXOq0l/VHK255HU84gj lJww== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlnwhsueIbX6sgq1rOzCZB4FgtTj9Ec3lr33qyo3/8S70jnCa9bqCfq0V3OrMlupsXHXIcaIjGj9Cf8nZpZfIRKI2cwTw== X-Received: by 10.28.137.213 with SMTP id l204mr890490wmd.100.1452006836586; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 07:13:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.170.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n5sm4027548wmf.3.2016.01.05.07.13.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Jan 2016 07:13:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 07:13:55 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 15:13:54 GMT Received: from mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u05FDscN066143; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 15:13:54 GMT (envelope-from mexas@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u05FDsX4066142; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 15:13:54 GMT (envelope-from mexas) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201601051513.u05FDsX4066142@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, matthew@FreeBSD.org, mexas@bris.ac.uk Subject: Re: sendmail config help Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk In-Reply-To: <568BD595.6070500@FreeBSD.org> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 15:13:59 -0000 >From matthew@freebsd.org Tue Jan 5 15:09:56 2016 >Given you've an ac.uk address, try finding the O'Reilly Sendmail book in >the library there. It's a bit of a doorstop, but a lot of it consists >of enumerating various different options -- reference stuff, rather than >instructional material. Not sure if it's still available to buy, but >that is probably the best guide to Sendmail you'll find. Yes, we have it, 4th edition, 2008. I actually ordered it for the library myself a few years ago. Not an easy read... >For quick reference I find /usr/share/sendmail/cf/README is actually >pretty good. Will do. Many thanks Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jan 5 16:23:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA76A63090 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 16:23:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markus@edemalm.se) Received: from server.edemalm.se (server.edemalm.se [IPv6:2001:470:28:47::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "server.edemalm.se", Issuer "Markus Edemalm TLS CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE91B1021 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 16:23:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markus@edemalm.se) Received: from host-10.edemalm.se (host-10.edemalm.se [IPv6:2001:470:28:47::10]) by server.edemalm.se with ESMTPSA id u05GNIn9011287 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 5 Jan 2016 17:23:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from markus@edemalm.se) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=edemalm.se; s=edemalm; t=1452010999; bh=7TAfTishCVJ54iC4LOx/qnDnb9eY4rWKiYhlAZwfMlY=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=iA5SUwCueZGZvs/uakUp4g4K5eJlYe+3OkHsGtOcHPYWLmvlWsM1a6cEOFfmIE/o+ 6jvTwVIcVdtt4W4NgUbtShc8xKcLrgV3Mil1hrodUBTY+LvPCtKBqph9guSl57fPCv h/GbXlmJ5hLrSbyJnNuYzG0o0Fo1AIC6V3/5TA+8= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.1 \(3096.5\)) Subject: Re: Safe to delete old files in /usr/lib? From: Markus Edemalm In-Reply-To: <568B3CD2.8030708@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 17:23:18 +0100 Cc: Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <833B0203-87FA-45F3-82BC-6250CD1EF735@edemalm.se> References: <20160104181211.76907a30.freebsd@edvax.de> <20160104185245.5ca2e4f1.freebsd@edvax.de> <20160104203418.aee8df91.freebsd@edvax.de> <568B3CD2.8030708@ShaneWare.Biz> To: Shane Ambler X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5) Received-SPF: Pass (sender authenticated); receiver=server.edemalm.se; client-ip=IPv6:2001:470:28:47::10; envelope-from= Received-SPF: Pass (sender authenticated); receiver=server.edemalm.se; client-ip=IPv6:2001:470:28:47::10; helo=host-10.edemalm.se X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 16:23:24 -0000 > 5 jan. 2016 kl. 04:47 skrev Shane Ambler : >=20 > On 05/01/2016 06:04, Polytropon wrote: >> On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:18:02 +0100, Markus Edemalm wrote: >>>> 4 jan. 2016 kl. 18:52 skrev Polytropon : >>>>=20 >>>> On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:28:14 +0100, Markus Edemalm wrote: >>>>>> 4 jan. 2016 kl. 18:12 skrev Polytropon : >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:06:00 +0100, Markus Edemalm wrote: >>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> My system was first installed as 10.0-RELEASE. I have >>>>>>> sinceupgraded to 10.1, 10.1-STABLE, 10.2-RELEASE and is now > >>>>>> at 10.2-RELEASE-p8. >>>>>>> I=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=E2=84=A2ve rebuild from source and followed the = steps in the > >>>>>> handbook. Everything is fine=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C2=A6 but: >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> I see many files in /usr/lib with old dates, apparently >>>>>>> they are > no longer installed during upgrades. >=20 > Did you clear out /usr/obj > With the right modifications dates, a binary doesn't need to be = rebuilt >=20 > While I think make buildworld should clean it out, some files may get = missed. Yes, I always delete /usr/obj before I start. Just like the handbook = suggests. >>>>> And, they are all .a files, except for libc++.so and libc.so. >>>>>=20 >>>>> I added NO_PROFILE=3Dtrue to /etc/make.conf a while back. Is that = relevant? >>>>=20 >>>> Hmmm... I always thought that would be the default (no profiling = libs >>>> being built and installed). But according to "man src.conf", the >>>> setting's name is WITHOUT_PROFILE, not NO_PROFILE. I removed NO_PROFILE=3Dtrue from /etc/make.conf and rebuilt everything = today. Now I got the _p.a files installed. But no .a files. For each lib in = /usr/lib I have, for example: -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 29242 Dec 2 2014 librt.a lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 10 Jan 5 16:50 librt.so@ -> = librt.so.1 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 23832 Jan 5 16:50 librt.so.1 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 32202 Jan 5 16:50 librt_p.a -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 30550 Dec 2 2014 libpanelw.a lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 14 Jan 5 16:50 libpanelw.so@ -> = libpanelw.so.5 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 11840 Jan 5 16:50 libpanelw.so.5 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 31678 Jan 5 16:50 libpanelw_p.a See the dates? Why do I get fresh _p.a files and no .a files? >>>=20 >>> Hmm. I forgot about src.conf, I got: >>>=20 >>> cat /etc/src.conf >>> WITHOUT_BLUETOOTH=3Dyes >>> WITHOUT_FLOPPY=3Dyes >>> WITHOUT_IPFW=3Dyes >>> WITHOUT_IPFILTER=3Dyes >>>=20 >>> That may explain why _some_ libs are not being built and installed. >>> But still, more than 100 .a files with old dates. Doesn=C3=A2=E2=82=AC= =E2=84=A2t make sense to me at all. >>=20 >> In this case, a good idea would be to move the old libraries out >> of /usr/lib (for example into a newly created /usr/lib.old directory) >> and checking if any application in use produces an error. In that >> case, the required library could be restored. If no further error >> appears - forget about those libraries. :-) >=20 > .a files should be copied into the final binary, so removing .a files > won't break anything that is already built, but the next make could > fail with a missing library at link time. >=20 > I am running 10-stable and run make delete-old after upgrades - I did: # make check-old-libs >>> Checking for old libraries (nothing found) # make delete-old-libs >>> Removing old libraries Please be sure no application still uses those libraries, else you can not start such an application. Consult UPDATING for more information regarding how to cope with the removal/revision bump of a specific library. >>> Old libraries removed (nothing to remove) > ls /usr/lib/*.a | wc -l > 292 > ls /usr/lib/*.so | wc -l > 162 >=20 > find /usr/lib -type l -name "*.a" | wc -l > 22 >=20 > I do seem to have a few old libs >=20 > find /usr/lib -not -newermt "2 weeks ago" | wc -l > 19 >=20 > Downloading base.txz for 10.2-RELEASE - >=20 > ls usr/lib/*.a | wc -l > 287 > ls usr/lib/*.so | wc -l > 162 Here=E2=80=99s my number after todays rebuild: $ ls /usr/lib/*.a | wc -l 283 $ ls /usr/lib/*_p.a | wc -l 138 $ ls /usr/lib/*.so | wc -l 160 > --=20 > FreeBSD - the place to B...Software Developing >=20 > Shane Ambler >=20 /ME From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jan 5 17:12:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 846E3A62136 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 17:12:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56A61127F; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 17:12:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u05HCcfi021619 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 5 Jan 2016 10:12:38 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u05HCcj7021616; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 10:12:38 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 10:12:38 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Matthew Seaman cc: Shahin Hasanov , FREEBSD_QUESTION Subject: Re: There is problem during dump/restore. In-Reply-To: <568BD0FB.5020303@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <568BC37C.2010903@FreeBSD.org> <568BD0FB.5020303@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 05 Jan 2016 10:12:38 -0700 (MST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 17:12:40 -0000 On Tue, 5 Jan 2016, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 05/01/2016 13:39, Shahin Hasanov wrote: >> Thank you Matthew, >> I have two HDD da0,da1 >> da0 is 147GB - ufs >> da1 is 1.1TB - zfs > > Ah -- there is your problem. dump/restore only works with UFS. The description was confusing, but appeared to be restoring to a UFS filesystem from a dumpfile saved on a ZFS filesystem. I think (but have not tested) that restore should work on ZFS or other filesystems if they support the same attributes, because restore writes at the file level. The target filesystem does not have to be empty, but if there are files in it with the same names as those being restored, the -u option will stop restore from complaining about them. It does make the restore take longer. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jan 5 17:12:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8481BA62168 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 17:12:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) Received: from radel.com (fly.radel.com [70.184.242.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "*.radel.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 403A513BB for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 17:12:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) X-CGP-ClamAV-Result: CLEAN X-VirusScanner: Niversoft's CGPClamav Helper v1.18.7 (ClamAV engine v0.98.7) Received: from [2001:470:880a:4389:9184:9b12:ac50:e13c] (account jon@radel.com HELO gravenstein.local) by radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.2 _community_) with ESMTPSA id 969899 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 16:12:38 +0000 Subject: Re: sendmail config help To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201601051413.u05EDiRX065867@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> <568BD595.6070500@FreeBSD.org> From: Jon Radel Message-ID: <568BEB76.9040403@radel.com> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:12:38 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <568BD595.6070500@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="------------ms030507030901040907090109" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 17:12:49 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms030507030901040907090109 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 1/5/16 9:39 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > In fact, even if your mail host uses just the domain as its hostname,= > I'd still have > > z.com. IN MX 0 z.com. > > Which looks entirely redundant, but the reason to have it is more socia= l > and reputational rather than technical. Though if your DNS caching and negative caching times are "normal" I=20 believe that's also liable to save time if anyone ever sends you more=20 than one e-mail. In other words, a sending SMTP daemon will [or is=20 supposed to-YMMV for various spam generating engines] check for an MX=20 record before it falls back to using the A record directly, and an MX=20 record is liable to be cached near the sender for longer than the=20 information that there is no MX record. Actually, under many circumstances, time will also be saved on the first = e-mail, as the initial query for MX records will frequently trigger a=20 reply with the appropriate A records included in the additional records=20 of the response, so the sending daemon won't have to make further=20 queries for the appropriate A record(s). Eventually those milliseconds add up. :-) In other words, unless there is good reason to not have an MX record,=20 I'd suggest always having an MX record for any name at which you wish to = regularly receive e-mail. --Jon Radel jon@radel.com --------------ms030507030901040907090109 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExDzANBglghkgBZQMEAgEFADCABgkqhkiG9w0BBwEAAKCC Cq8wggSvMIIDl6ADAgECAhEA4CPLFRKDU4mtYW56VGdrITANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFADBvMQsw CQYDVQQGEwJTRTEUMBIGA1UEChMLQWRkVHJ1c3QgQUIxJjAkBgNVBAsTHUFkZFRydXN0IEV4 dGVybmFsIFRUUCBOZXR3b3JrMSIwIAYDVQQDExlBZGRUcnVzdCBFeHRlcm5hbCBDQSBSb290 MB4XDTE0MTIyMjAwMDAwMFoXDTIwMDUzMDEwNDgzOFowgZsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYD VQQIExJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcTB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNP TU9ETyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMUEwPwYDVQQDEzhDT01PRE8gU0hBLTI1NiBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVu dGljYXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBDQTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCC AQoCggEBAImxDdp6UxlOcFIdvFamBia3uEngludRq/HwWhNJFaO0jBtgvHpRQqd5jKQi3xdh TpHVdiMKFNNKAn+2HQmAbqUEPdm6uxb+oYepLkNSQxZ8rzJQyKZPWukI2M+TJZx7iOgwZOak +FaA/SokFDMXmaxE5WmLo0YGS8Iz1OlAnwawsayTQLm1CJM6nCpToxDbPSBhPFUDjtlOdiUC ISn6o3xxdk/u4V+B6ftUgNvDezVSt4TeIj0sMC0xf1m9UjewM2ktQ+v61qXxl3dnUYzZ7ifr vKUHOHaMpKk4/9+M9QOsSb7K93OZOg8yq5yVOhM9DkY6V3RhUL7GQD/L5OKfoiECAwEAAaOC ARcwggETMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFK29mHo0tCb3+sQmVO8DveAky1QaMB0GA1UdDgQWBBSSYWuC 4aKgqk/sZ/HCo/e0gADB7DAOBgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMCAYYwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADAd BgNVHSUEFjAUBggrBgEFBQcDAgYIKwYBBQUHAwQwEQYDVR0gBAowCDAGBgRVHSAAMEQGA1Ud HwQ9MDswOaA3oDWGM2h0dHA6Ly9jcmwudXNlcnRydXN0LmNvbS9BZGRUcnVzdEV4dGVybmFs Q0FSb290LmNybDA1BggrBgEFBQcBAQQpMCcwJQYIKwYBBQUHMAGGGWh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLnVz ZXJ0cnVzdC5jb20wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQELBQADggEBABsqbqxVwTqriMXY7c1V86prYSvACRAj mQ/FZmpvsfW0tXdeDwJhAN99Bf4Ss6SAgAD8+x1banICCkG8BbrBWNUmwurVTYT7/oKYz1gb 4yJjnFL4uwU2q31Ypd6rO2Pl2tVz7+zg+3vio//wQiOcyraNTT7kSxgDsqgt1Ni7QkuQaYUQ 26Y3NOh74AEQpZzKOsefT4g0bopl0BqKu6ncyso20fT8wmQpNa/WsadxEdIDQ7GPPprsnjJT 9HaSyoY0B7ksyuYcStiZDcGG4pCS+1pCaiMhEOllx/XVu37qjIUgAmLq0ToHLFnFmTPyOInl tukWeh95FPZKEBom+nyK+5swggX4MIIE4KADAgECAhBzVOU8fWu0zQ1gaQ38zgEbMA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBCwUAMIGbMQswCQYDVQQGEwJHQjEbMBkGA1UECBMSR3JlYXRlciBNYW5jaGVzdGVy MRAwDgYDVQQHEwdTYWxmb3JkMRowGAYDVQQKExFDT01PRE8gQ0EgTGltaXRlZDFBMD8GA1UE AxM4Q09NT0RPIFNIQS0yNTYgQ2xpZW50IEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBTZWN1cmUgRW1h aWwgQ0EwHhcNMTUwMzMwMDAwMDAwWhcNMTgwMzI5MjM1OTU5WjCB+jELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMx DjAMBgNVBBETBTIyMTUwMQswCQYDVQQIEwJWQTEUMBIGA1UEBxMLU3ByaW5nZmllbGQxGjAY BgNVBAkTETY5MTcgUmlkZ2V3YXkgRHIuMRUwEwYDVQQKEwxKb24gVC4gUmFkZWwxMjAwBgNV BAsTKUlzc3VlZCB0aHJvdWdoIEpvbiBULiBSYWRlbCBFLVBLSSBNYW5hZ2VyMR8wHQYDVQQL ExZDb3Jwb3JhdGUgU2VjdXJlIEVtYWlsMRIwEAYDVQQDEwlKb24gUmFkZWwxHDAaBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQEWDWpvbkByYWRlbC5jb20wggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQDe 1Rth9hbQqaODn++C5dVAQH9nM2VH3oPazZufOwmIG2SXI/v3PuemcQQ3JkhmpQ06gYszyXbk TCLsqvEfalYj81jdt/K5lT4aVdj0LfJIWyTcU95V2rsCuHsSvn/PnIcsEtXg53rCtqS4EOtJ 9u3rY2hP8YCiyz1yY3mn4nKJs93MHG4AkXYuVpzfaIADETcVrA+razvXEfnDJXXDZZ9ZuuV1 06yIovOvhYWSlaVu8nrSHJjXFZI2IXwgIeVBoMih3yu6LLj14I/YdZ0rIA8K+UNB+NW6Ri3u wHXBbr4jh3ZqkrqIVUrf1VeybhdrJcdqXdMNHjKDSlCoaxYRbLy1AgMBAAGjggHVMIIB0TAf BgNVHSMEGDAWgBSSYWuC4aKgqk/sZ/HCo/e0gADB7DAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUz9YB10WEfBNHskRw o/0vh8qaQuwwDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgWgMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwHQYDVR0lBBYwFAYIKwYB BQUHAwQGCCsGAQUFBwMCMEYGA1UdIAQ/MD0wOwYMKwYBBAGyMQECAQMFMCswKQYIKwYBBQUH AgEWHWh0dHBzOi8vc2VjdXJlLmNvbW9kby5uZXQvQ1BTMF0GA1UdHwRWMFQwUqBQoE6GTGh0 dHA6Ly9jcmwuY29tb2RvY2EuY29tL0NPTU9ET1NIQTI1NkNsaWVudEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9u YW5kU2VjdXJlRW1haWxDQS5jcmwwgZAGCCsGAQUFBwEBBIGDMIGAMFgGCCsGAQUFBzAChkxo dHRwOi8vY3J0LmNvbW9kb2NhLmNvbS9DT01PRE9TSEEyNTZDbGllbnRBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlv bmFuZFNlY3VyZUVtYWlsQ0EuY3J0MCQGCCsGAQUFBzABhhhodHRwOi8vb2NzcC5jb21vZG9j YS5jb20wGAYDVR0RBBEwD4ENam9uQHJhZGVsLmNvbTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFAAOCAQEAS1Pe +gBgP+SQ/a5I5e7zX0Rg0DhH378LHlZixJgS6LfCPL2edKMUQi3Th9GXfLjdeyeWuMWoz925 ZzBHcPwkBeH+iM/AEhu0Dhi0kop/p66g9tEPJUZ/KDsqxddNDrD0Typn3/33pHTjJEDqydzA gwB0Nn8blpMbqSwT+j8wuPakfLsj1cSDzXrTLLsmIQB7auAyaYXdWyW8Yqw336rLUCvjOUfn qOOyjVsieTw/0PLoOHJaGyez+VtV4eyi6p1SNiX32A+fvxBMzKQLCokE43cXItc9Okzq//f2 fuvGp17r8mpm4OjjM5E2kwsg9bBPUBMR4/sxosKVLn0o9rxlozGCBEEwggQ9AgEBMIGwMIGb MQswCQYDVQQGEwJHQjEbMBkGA1UECBMSR3JlYXRlciBNYW5jaGVzdGVyMRAwDgYDVQQHEwdT YWxmb3JkMRowGAYDVQQKExFDT01PRE8gQ0EgTGltaXRlZDFBMD8GA1UEAxM4Q09NT0RPIFNI QS0yNTYgQ2xpZW50IEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBTZWN1cmUgRW1haWwgQ0ECEHNU5Tx9 a7TNDWBpDfzOARswDQYJYIZIAWUDBAIBBQCgggJhMBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0B BwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTE2MDEwNTE2MTIzOFowLwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMSIEIFglDlhE enmXTehH4EiVcS3OuxE7DUgTJFa0/ERbYvF9MGwGCSqGSIb3DQEJDzFfMF0wCwYJYIZIAWUD BAEqMAsGCWCGSAFlAwQBAjAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZIhvcN AwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwgcEGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDGBszCBsDCBmzEL MAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNVBAgTEkdyZWF0ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBxMHU2Fs Zm9yZDEaMBgGA1UEChMRQ09NT0RPIENBIExpbWl0ZWQxQTA/BgNVBAMTOENPTU9ETyBTSEEt MjU2IENsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgU2VjdXJlIEVtYWlsIENBAhBzVOU8fWu0 zQ1gaQ38zgEbMIHDBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzGBs6CBsDCBmzELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNV BAgTEkdyZWF0ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBxMHU2FsZm9yZDEaMBgGA1UEChMRQ09N T0RPIENBIExpbWl0ZWQxQTA/BgNVBAMTOENPTU9ETyBTSEEtMjU2IENsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50 aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgU2VjdXJlIEVtYWlsIENBAhBzVOU8fWu0zQ1gaQ38zgEbMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBAQUABIIBAJe5Q6gyQH90eTrCUsTdnbAhAY9w/co/ggNMhoXoXOWuZi7cUs3unuPC5L+0 m3yI2VW3N2+PMJarbL3cOIoCJ0I7UFUnbRyoJ0Lu19TwHq6aZkvGIv6a0JAxbbIU6dmnosy4 0PIZG+byH5EY1C141Pqn+3LleLAaxAWV3ttHbnHfe9+QVG/p385nyq+9A6HJ5R90ENYkuesn 3op9zWCj1SDMEQ9W3NhA0hDqs0b/WH9SLC6332bkj7D7kZII4OdxwfGu0cBsmaMVhPggZKPw JnC27NFXpLH2c6gioDgoVOh7v6flyltI/KZeFXesqTpkLztInLhwP++6oI0tfmyjjfQAAAAA AAA= --------------ms030507030901040907090109-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jan 5 19:34:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81086A6332E for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 19:34:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markus@edemalm.se) Received: from server.edemalm.se (server.edemalm.se [IPv6:2001:470:28:47::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "server.edemalm.se", Issuer "Markus Edemalm TLS CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C5AE1F99 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 19:34:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markus@edemalm.se) Received: from host-10.edemalm.se (host-10.edemalm.se [IPv6:2001:470:28:47::10]) by server.edemalm.se with ESMTPSA id u05JYmUm001869 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 5 Jan 2016 20:34:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from markus@edemalm.se) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=edemalm.se; s=edemalm; t=1452022490; bh=ZXi8hYyRWRkg7ztIzeW7LL8F7MwsQvNHINMxqkh/Whg=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:References:To; b=1DrKyKaY9orN9pAj+gYqE242M+6EIR/Ki85pRM54YOO/eI+/ia1lDu3x5fVN8vKI7 xxiqMgajs/ZCDl8kN2Tdu5bPVhijmVr/CaNd9Sdq4izB5F0IeO4ay+6i3lfVY+TG72 NNXDHPsxHzJnzmxDaJR5amiRWu5PZsI5KVsnEny8= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.1 \(3096.5\)) Subject: Re: Safe to delete old files in /usr/lib? From: Markus Edemalm In-Reply-To: <833B0203-87FA-45F3-82BC-6250CD1EF735@edemalm.se> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 20:34:48 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <45F8376E-7B69-4815-8979-E55C407A9B89@edemalm.se> References: <20160104181211.76907a30.freebsd@edvax.de> <20160104185245.5ca2e4f1.freebsd@edvax.de> <20160104203418.aee8df91.freebsd@edvax.de> <568B3CD2.8030708@ShaneWare.Biz> <833B0203-87FA-45F3-82BC-6250CD1EF735@edemalm.se> To: Shane Ambler , Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5) Received-SPF: Pass (sender authenticated); receiver=server.edemalm.se; client-ip=IPv6:2001:470:28:47::10; envelope-from= Received-SPF: Pass (sender authenticated); receiver=server.edemalm.se; client-ip=IPv6:2001:470:28:47::10; helo=host-10.edemalm.se X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 19:34:54 -0000 >>>>>> I added NO_PROFILE=3Dtrue to /etc/make.conf a while back. Is that = relevant? >>>>>=20 >>>>> Hmmm... I always thought that would be the default (no profiling = libs >>>>> being built and installed). But according to "man src.conf", the >>>>> setting's name is WITHOUT_PROFILE, not NO_PROFILE. >=20 > I removed NO_PROFILE=3Dtrue from /etc/make.conf and rebuilt everything = today. > Now I got the _p.a files installed. But no .a files. For each lib in = /usr/lib I have, for example: >=20 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 29242 Dec 2 2014 librt.a > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 10 Jan 5 16:50 librt.so@ -> = librt.so.1 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 23832 Jan 5 16:50 librt.so.1 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 32202 Jan 5 16:50 librt_p.a >=20 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 30550 Dec 2 2014 libpanelw.a > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 14 Jan 5 16:50 libpanelw.so@ -> = libpanelw.so.5 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 11840 Jan 5 16:50 libpanelw.so.5 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 31678 Jan 5 16:50 libpanelw_p.a >=20 > See the dates? Why do I get fresh _p.a files and no .a files? >=20 Update. I moved all *.a files to /usr/lib/old and did: # cd /usr/src/lib # make install Now, everything including .a files installs and get fresh dates. = Following the example above: -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 29242 Jan 5 18:46 librt.a lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 10 Jan 5 18:46 librt.so@ -> librt.so.1 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 23832 Jan 5 18:46 librt.so.1 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 32202 Jan 5 18:46 librt_p.a -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 30550 Jan 5 18:46 libpanelw.a lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 14 Jan 5 18:46 libpanelw.so@ -> = libpanelw.so.5 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 11840 Jan 5 18:46 libpanelw.so.5 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 31678 Jan 5 18:46 libpanelw_p.a So, It looks like the installer ignores existing files if they have the = same size? Just curious what=E2=80=99s going on. /ME From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jan 5 19:43:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09E0CA638E0 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 19:43:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vsasjason@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com (mail-wm0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E69718C5 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 19:43:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vsasjason@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id f206so35608638wmf.0 for ; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 11:43:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=+YiQPQQlnV4XYxfiki8b+mIOThRd+RGsOihHtcqUUaA=; b=nlMNT7XTqTVnUEJWUqDUCOyehKYqb09MsY96QYLE5fjcnRjnbKvfvgEjizN7slrado DhFevMZMqWFFUTRvvYYiW2u3nLPPYs7MdAzaO/0SOGtbMterfOp4b3CuiZkH8AF0g7t3 z79CLc7U3L5nQnGU4QQFBkMvqrCz7caaOSOcbibfgRj3OxKzvY0cALccsR62AxJkIT8c DwAtbOXuuQGydi6e6dX80cBuPDAy7oIh1I/64f7yQBZD1YFiS1I0X9rLjq8KSYXFfpT5 r0LDlq42ds+FdEE0dWFztqhZm9RUqpxNsGq2Yaq38KiHVCQg/AWNpOO8gF80kSEH3sue t0EA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.202.135 with SMTP id ki7mr81438014wjc.81.1452023001019; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 11:43:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.76.207 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:43:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.76.207 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:43:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <45F8376E-7B69-4815-8979-E55C407A9B89@edemalm.se> References: <20160104181211.76907a30.freebsd@edvax.de> <20160104185245.5ca2e4f1.freebsd@edvax.de> <20160104203418.aee8df91.freebsd@edvax.de> <568B3CD2.8030708@ShaneWare.Biz> <833B0203-87FA-45F3-82BC-6250CD1EF735@edemalm.se> <45F8376E-7B69-4815-8979-E55C407A9B89@edemalm.se> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 22:43:20 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Safe to delete old files in /usr/lib? From: Anton Sayetsky To: Markus Edemalm Cc: FreeBSD Questions , Polytropon , Shane Ambler Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 19:43:23 -0000 5 =D1=8F=D0=BD=D0=B2. 2016 =D0=B3. 21:35 =D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=BB=D1=8C=D0=B7=D0= =BE=D0=B2=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8C "Markus Edemalm" =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB: > > > >>>>>> I added NO_PROFILE=3Dtrue to /etc/make.conf a while back. Is that relevant? > >>>>> > >>>>> Hmmm... I always thought that would be the default (no profiling libs > >>>>> being built and installed). But according to "man src.conf", the > >>>>> setting's name is WITHOUT_PROFILE, not NO_PROFILE. > > > > I removed NO_PROFILE=3Dtrue from /etc/make.conf and rebuilt everything today. > > Now I got the _p.a files installed. But no .a files. For each lib in /usr/lib I have, for example: > > > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 29242 Dec 2 2014 librt.a > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 10 Jan 5 16:50 librt.so@ -> librt.so.1 > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 23832 Jan 5 16:50 librt.so.1 > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 32202 Jan 5 16:50 librt_p.a > > > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 30550 Dec 2 2014 libpanelw.a > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 14 Jan 5 16:50 libpanelw.so@ -> libpanelw.so.5 > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 11840 Jan 5 16:50 libpanelw.so.5 > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 31678 Jan 5 16:50 libpanelw_p.a > > > > See the dates? Why do I get fresh _p.a files and no .a files? > > > > Update. I moved all *.a files to /usr/lib/old and did: > > # cd /usr/src/lib > # make install > > Now, everything including .a files installs and get fresh dates. Following the example above: > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 29242 Jan 5 18:46 librt.a > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 10 Jan 5 18:46 librt.so@ -> librt.so.1 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 23832 Jan 5 18:46 librt.so.1 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 32202 Jan 5 18:46 librt_p.a > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 30550 Jan 5 18:46 libpanelw.a > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 14 Jan 5 18:46 libpanelw.so@ -> libpanelw.so.5 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 11840 Jan 5 18:46 libpanelw.so.5 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 31678 Jan 5 18:46 libpanelw_p.a > > So, It looks like the installer ignores existing files if they have the same size? man install /-C > Just curious what=E2=80=99s going on. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jan 5 19:51:14 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C86A63CB7 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 19:51:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markus@edemalm.se) Received: from server.edemalm.se (server.edemalm.se [IPv6:2001:470:28:47::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "server.edemalm.se", Issuer "Markus Edemalm TLS CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F3B91D0E for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 19:51:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markus@edemalm.se) Received: from host-10.edemalm.se (host-10.edemalm.se [IPv6:2001:470:28:47::10]) by server.edemalm.se with ESMTPSA id u05Jp9DF001938 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 5 Jan 2016 20:51:10 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from markus@edemalm.se) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=edemalm.se; s=edemalm; t=1452023470; bh=ArAhQX7mXzce/hJEcnYLNlxzuIidgr0C85mYeadZvhQ=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=Tl96qs+pGmb4OtX4+liwI1992dGAjnlrQrfM7PJwiWLzFLwLscC8jiN6zlfjn0Ly3 ahXSULYJcxAS6RP9g9UL8q54AtlXkWliYvG27WIPIzWcxVVhq30ubRJx2tv/y5BaIV 96fgDRraeVzEPHR6zYldRSzHvWSpzP2llIYjIRm4= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.1 \(3096.5\)) Subject: Re: Safe to delete old files in /usr/lib? From: Markus Edemalm In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 20:51:09 +0100 Cc: Polytropon , FreeBSD Questions , Shane Ambler Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <278C6DE9-9270-43CC-8BCE-47B65685D2FB@edemalm.se> References: <20160104181211.76907a30.freebsd@edvax.de> <20160104185245.5ca2e4f1.freebsd@edvax.de> <20160104203418.aee8df91.freebsd@edvax.de> <568B3CD2.8030708@ShaneWare.Biz> <833B0203-87FA-45F3-82BC-6250CD1EF735@edemalm.se> <45F8376E-7B69-4815-8979-E55C407A9B89@edemalm.se> To: Anton Sayetsky X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5) Received-SPF: Pass (sender authenticated); receiver=server.edemalm.se; client-ip=IPv6:2001:470:28:47::10; envelope-from= Received-SPF: Pass (sender authenticated); receiver=server.edemalm.se; client-ip=IPv6:2001:470:28:47::10; helo=host-10.edemalm.se X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 19:51:14 -0000 > 5 jan. 2016 kl. 20:43 skrev Anton Sayetsky : >>=20 >> So, It looks like the installer ignores existing files if they have = the > same size? > man install > /-C >=20 >> Just curious what=E2=80=99s going on. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Thank you! "If the target's file flags and mode need not to be changed, the target's inode change time is also unchanged." Case solved and closed. /ME From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jan 6 12:16:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9963DA65DAE for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:16:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fidaj@ukr.net) Received: from frv25.fwdcdn.com (frv25.fwdcdn.com [212.42.77.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624231F17 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:16:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fidaj@ukr.net) Received: from [10.10.14.27] (helo=frv158.fwdcdn.com) by frv25.fwdcdn.com QID:1aGmlK-0007UH-Li/RC:1; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 14:00:22 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net; s=fsm; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=7M24lar0NBkObuWMlcAVC/MUTaYmRgytxzI0bkoCUho=; b=YjSYh5imRy1siKoyAmODZiEn13DiRcdMFZCDsYf/HMhtnSUMlCiT1iJGH/F1LgOwqtim1Tp5XE8vm+frGfrmleeSnuA/n1QXg8zDRJUsMgFZCb0N9mhJtVcD0Hv+RLPGVsbaR38CNNtU+N0edHRDYf32IFMTaRlldjip44YqGDc=; Received: from [178.137.139.189] (helo=nonamehost.local) by frv158.fwdcdn.com with esmtpsa ID 1aGmlC-000Flt-Ou for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 14:00:14 +0200 Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 14:00:14 +0200 From: Ivan Klymenko To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: MESA & Video memory Message-ID: <20160106140014.1c941fb7@nonamehost.local> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.1 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Authentication-Result: IP=178.137.139.189; mail.from=fidaj@ukr.net; dkim=pass; header.d=ukr.net X-Ukrnet-Yellow: 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 12:16:05 -0000 Hi ALL. I have: vgapci0@pci0:0:2:0: class=0x030000 card=0x167c103c chip=0x01168086 rev=0x09 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '2nd Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics Controller' class = display subclass = VGA and Extended renderer info (GLX_MESA_query_renderer): Vendor: Intel Open Source Technology Center (0x8086) Device: Mesa DRI Intel(R) Sandybridge Mobile (0x116) Version: 11.0.8 Accelerated: yes Video memory: 1536MB Unified memory: yes Preferred profile: core (0x1) Max core profile version: 3.3 Max compat profile version: 3.0 Max GLES1 profile version: 1.1 Max GLES[23] profile version: 3.0 glxinfo | grep 'Video memory' Video memory: 1536MB I do not need much video memory. How to reduce the size of video memory? (for me it is much more valuable to have more RAM) Option in/etc/X11/xorg.conf VideoRam 32768 it does not affect the allocated memory. BIOS also does not include any adjustments to allocate video memory. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jan 6 18:38:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56D9FA65B74 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 18:38:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgniazdowski@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-x230.google.com (mail-lb0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCD0D1AB7 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 18:38:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgniazdowski@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lb0-x230.google.com with SMTP id bc4so195038884lbc.2 for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 10:38:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=xjlfwrpREQ577lfxLDIve2UoB+6stvdzf/y5EllVO0k=; b=w1OADxxk9xoggAtmznlM2n7FqbvNx3+nb3ch4DIBJQCLCPx3QhAiLzrFVHnDpyM29s OWm8ibCbcqfTDleYtoFs1zJ8blAXXwo2O0hXQFYlhTL/SsTpVdKt6HV4ws94ZOV7zbxl 324xSsWE/mUjJyCLnzIm95KPsAQnHBkIflSNFjgmOlgdFxRzULmRK72lYQ+5OF/JQh1A ItJcz5A/kp7zQBsObu6LY3bjzxOGUtcEMS4jZdmJOCEPcmtn+rXRfnHiToW0nOYjIdJx 861unMNO1Z3ridFy/8M3ecqe7leT1WL+HAnUDPzx2D3T2jP1BSh6wycvOnXqbbh8S9jL ArAg== X-Received: by 10.112.64.5 with SMTP id k5mr17982455lbs.133.1452105534649; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 10:38:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.62.111 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 10:38:35 -0800 (PST) From: Sebastian Gniazdowski Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 19:38:35 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: TERM=xterm lacking smcup and rmcup (alternate screen) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 18:38:58 -0000 Hello I want to criticize an approach taken in FreeBSD regarding the alternate screen. It's not available in newcons. One person wrote that's because Tekken doesn't have such feature, and newcons implements Tekken. That's maybe fine. However, newcons doesn't have it's own termcap. It uses TERM=xterm, which normally has rmcup and smcup. Some smart person thus decided to remove those codes from TERM=xterm. You see what this leads to? No alternate screen on X11. Why doesn't newcon create it's own termcap entry? Why nobody cares about trashed xterm screens when fullscreen applications are exiting. In my software I've wrote a special function to handle FreeBSD nuance: https://github.com/psprint/zsh-cmd-architect/blob/master/zca#L65-L81 But this should be fixed, really. Newcons could ignore rmcup and smcup. Why remove them from TERM=xterm, let newcons just ignore it. FreeBSD could then still use TERM=xterm for its virtual terminal. Best regards, Sebastian Gniazdowski From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jan 6 20:04:32 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3607A65A72 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 20:04:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ike@michaeleichorn.com) Received: from mx1.eichornenterprises.com (mx1.eichornenterprises.com [104.236.13.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.eichornenterprises.com", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88D681472 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 20:04:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ike@michaeleichorn.com) Received: from smtp.eichornenterprises.com (cpe-184-59-147-149.neo.res.rr.com [184.59.147.149]) by mx1.eichornenterprises.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id a089e072; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 15:04:23 -0500 (EST) Received: by smtp.eichornenterprises.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 0d2b9e67 TLS version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 15:04:23 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <1452110676.9558.12.camel@michaeleichorn.com> Subject: Re: TERM=xterm lacking smcup and rmcup (alternate screen) From: "Michael B. Eichorn" To: Sebastian Gniazdowski , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 15:04:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="sha-256"; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; boundary="=-8XcWTewhRE9qax85kFoj" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 20:04:33 -0000 --=-8XcWTewhRE9qax85kFoj Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 19:38 +0100, Sebastian Gniazdowski wrote: > Hello > I want to criticize an approach taken in FreeBSD regarding the > alternate screen. It's not available in newcons. One person wrote > that's because Tekken doesn't have such feature, and newcons > implements Tekken. >=20 > That's maybe fine. However, newcons doesn't have it's own termcap. It > uses TERM=3Dxterm, which normally has rmcup and smcup. Some smart > person > thus decided to remove those codes from TERM=3Dxterm. You see what this > leads to? No alternate screen on X11. >=20 > Why doesn't newcon create it's own termcap entry? Why nobody cares > about trashed xterm screens when fullscreen applications are exiting. > In my software I've wrote a special function to handle FreeBSD > nuance: >=20 > https://github.com/psprint/zsh-cmd-architect/blob/master/zca#L65-L81 >=20 > But this should be fixed, really. Newcons could ignore rmcup and > smcup. Why remove them from TERM=3Dxterm, let newcons just ignore it. > FreeBSD could then still use TERM=3Dxterm for its virtual terminal. >=20 > Best regards, > Sebastian Gniazdowski Hi, Technical discussions like this are somewhat off-topic for this list. FreeBSD-questions is for 'user questions' and as such is primarily populated by users not developers. You probably want freebsd-hackers which is for 'Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD'. Regards, Ike --=-8XcWTewhRE9qax85kFoj Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExDzANBglghkgBZQMEAgEFADCABgkqhkiG9w0BBwEAAKCCEqAw ggYwMIIFGKADAgECAgMOXcYwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQELBQAwgYwxCzAJBgNVBAYTAklMMRYwFAYDVQQK Ew1TdGFydENvbSBMdGQuMSswKQYDVQQLEyJTZWN1cmUgRGlnaXRhbCBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTaWdu aW5nMTgwNgYDVQQDEy9TdGFydENvbSBDbGFzcyAxIFByaW1hcnkgSW50ZXJtZWRpYXRlIENsaWVu dCBDQTAeFw0xNTA2MTMyMDI0NDZaFw0xNjA2MTQwMDM1NTBaMEgxHzAdBgNVBAMMFmlrZUBtaWNo YWVsZWljaG9ybi5jb20xJTAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWFmlrZUBtaWNoYWVsZWljaG9ybi5jb20wggEi MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQDJVdWALPz5h2s5zUQGIJYl6Vp8FPtZNko8q/3s crCsxXJLprMaDdpnqTsmkbmEfKvsqPQE6HVOpGxVRTl/tCm+VvouW9eY9ITMigb1OnHdU13CKO0j drgeU1nHst0qxwsIofRD7nC4dakT6exnrVndlBmLrf/bLPh2qOM8YK5qKK6m33fE7AyYrwiYAWFT 3fERI7LakjaabrIoS/Y1rCdL5FaCTMOlRbZyduc8HkrgjT2JW+i4fVcKyGL5gExBJWfS3q1uGFaB ie6pYtl8lZPtvN0JSfibP003RBoLgzqHJKW91RL0qNeDjKZi/5nrlU398l9UoVvLLO3KxoPBXKCx AgMBAAGjggLcMIIC2DAJBgNVHRMEAjAAMAsGA1UdDwQEAwIEsDAdBgNVHSUEFjAUBggrBgEFBQcD AgYIKwYBBQUHAwQwHQYDVR0OBBYEFJZqarc6CcrOs6eAwOgrMznk5ZWWMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFFNy 7ZKc4NrLAVx8fpY1TvLUuFGCMCEGA1UdEQQaMBiBFmlrZUBtaWNoYWVsZWljaG9ybi5jb20wggFM BgNVHSAEggFDMIIBPzCCATsGCysGAQQBgbU3AQIDMIIBKjAuBggrBgEFBQcCARYiaHR0cDovL3d3 dy5zdGFydHNzbC5jb20vcG9saWN5LnBkZjCB9wYIKwYBBQUHAgIwgeowJxYgU3RhcnRDb20gQ2Vy dGlmaWNhdGlvbiBBdXRob3JpdHkwAwIBARqBvlRoaXMgY2VydGlmaWNhdGUgd2FzIGlzc3VlZCBh Y2NvcmRpbmcgdG8gdGhlIENsYXNzIDEgVmFsaWRhdGlvbiByZXF1aXJlbWVudHMgb2YgdGhlIFN0 YXJ0Q29tIENBIHBvbGljeSwgcmVsaWFuY2Ugb25seSBmb3IgdGhlIGludGVuZGVkIHB1cnBvc2Ug aW4gY29tcGxpYW5jZSBvZiB0aGUgcmVseWluZyBwYXJ0eSBvYmxpZ2F0aW9ucy4wNgYDVR0fBC8w LTAroCmgJ4YlaHR0cDovL2NybC5zdGFydHNzbC5jb20vY3J0dTEtY3JsLmNybDCBjgYIKwYBBQUH AQEEgYEwfzA5BggrBgEFBQcwAYYtaHR0cDovL29jc3Auc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tL3N1Yi9jbGFzczEv Y2xpZW50L2NhMEIGCCsGAQUFBzAChjZodHRwOi8vYWlhLnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9jZXJ0cy9zdWIu Y2xhc3MxLmNsaWVudC5jYS5jcnQwIwYDVR0SBBwwGoYYaHR0cDovL3d3dy5zdGFydHNzbC5jb20v MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAA4IBAQB4K8iQw+0FRn3xEnB3vIIu2Vi4C3ZGnOMWP90FFXLrZ6uAu9AK xVCjXUVP6nAEsOopTMu769vVecdBvg0KO2i5aTDTdTLX4g9d020g4OLWW1NiynAkX8oKqJLqZ53q vHK4zP4KWPS3bSqDWVCosTMfI+H6tkg+6G3gS0HHoHTLKZhIT3z6PQZAfeofM7ed6NOdAcj0J2lP ODHzzz7Y9x4wMwYJdidorzUDVYkNIkim8ak7hK9F60NadA5w/BirFATSlzRyV0h1tl6oNisEaQcq tGvy6UoCTDhzaJ7pQValfDXJ/A47P0hNj/CX/PmkY1wQHsEJz2pbh5lqteP/fO0rMIIGMDCCBRig AwIBAgIDDl3GMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAMIGMMQswCQYDVQQGEwJJTDEWMBQGA1UEChMNU3RhcnRD b20gTHRkLjErMCkGA1UECxMiU2VjdXJlIERpZ2l0YWwgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2lnbmluZzE4MDYG A1UEAxMvU3RhcnRDb20gQ2xhc3MgMSBQcmltYXJ5IEludGVybWVkaWF0ZSBDbGllbnQgQ0EwHhcN MTUwNjEzMjAyNDQ2WhcNMTYwNjE0MDAzNTUwWjBIMR8wHQYDVQQDDBZpa2VAbWljaGFlbGVpY2hv cm4uY29tMSUwIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhZpa2VAbWljaGFlbGVpY2hvcm4uY29tMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG 9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAyVXVgCz8+YdrOc1EBiCWJelafBT7WTZKPKv97HKwrMVyS6az Gg3aZ6k7JpG5hHyr7Kj0BOh1TqRsVUU5f7Qpvlb6LlvXmPSEzIoG9Tpx3VNdwijtI3a4HlNZx7Ld KscLCKH0Q+5wuHWpE+nsZ61Z3ZQZi63/2yz4dqjjPGCuaiiupt93xOwMmK8ImAFhU93xESOy2pI2 mm6yKEv2NawnS+RWgkzDpUW2cnbnPB5K4I09iVvouH1XCshi+YBMQSVn0t6tbhhWgYnuqWLZfJWT 7bzdCUn4mz9NN0QaC4M6hySlvdUS9KjXg4ymYv+Z65VN/fJfVKFbyyztysaDwVygsQIDAQABo4IC 3DCCAtgwCQYDVR0TBAIwADALBgNVHQ8EBAMCBLAwHQYDVR0lBBYwFAYIKwYBBQUHAwIGCCsGAQUF BwMEMB0GA1UdDgQWBBSWamq3OgnKzrOngMDoKzM55OWVljAfBgNVHSMEGDAWgBRTcu2SnODaywFc fH6WNU7y1LhRgjAhBgNVHREEGjAYgRZpa2VAbWljaGFlbGVpY2hvcm4uY29tMIIBTAYDVR0gBIIB QzCCAT8wggE7BgsrBgEEAYG1NwECAzCCASowLgYIKwYBBQUHAgEWImh0dHA6Ly93d3cuc3RhcnRz c2wuY29tL3BvbGljeS5wZGYwgfcGCCsGAQUFBwICMIHqMCcWIFN0YXJ0Q29tIENlcnRpZmljYXRp b24gQXV0aG9yaXR5MAMCAQEagb5UaGlzIGNlcnRpZmljYXRlIHdhcyBpc3N1ZWQgYWNjb3JkaW5n IHRvIHRoZSBDbGFzcyAxIFZhbGlkYXRpb24gcmVxdWlyZW1lbnRzIG9mIHRoZSBTdGFydENvbSBD QSBwb2xpY3ksIHJlbGlhbmNlIG9ubHkgZm9yIHRoZSBpbnRlbmRlZCBwdXJwb3NlIGluIGNvbXBs aWFuY2Ugb2YgdGhlIHJlbHlpbmcgcGFydHkgb2JsaWdhdGlvbnMuMDYGA1UdHwQvMC0wK6ApoCeG JWh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tL2NydHUxLWNybC5jcmwwgY4GCCsGAQUFBwEBBIGBMH8w OQYIKwYBBQUHMAGGLWh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9zdWIvY2xhc3MxL2NsaWVudC9j YTBCBggrBgEFBQcwAoY2aHR0cDovL2FpYS5zdGFydHNzbC5jb20vY2VydHMvc3ViLmNsYXNzMS5j bGllbnQuY2EuY3J0MCMGA1UdEgQcMBqGGGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tLzANBgkqhkiG 9w0BAQsFAAOCAQEAeCvIkMPtBUZ98RJwd7yCLtlYuAt2RpzjFj/dBRVy62ergLvQCsVQo11FT+pw BLDqKUzLu+vb1XnHQb4NCjtouWkw03Uy1+IPXdNtIODi1ltTYspwJF/KCqiS6med6rxyuMz+Clj0 t20qg1lQqLEzHyPh+rZIPuht4EtBx6B0yymYSE98+j0GQH3qHzO3nejTnQHI9CdpTzgx888+2Pce MDMGCXYnaK81A1WJDSJIpvGpO4SvRetDWnQOcPwYqxQE0pc0cldIdbZeqDYrBGkHKrRr8ulKAkw4 c2ie6UFWpXw1yfwOOz9ITY/wl/z5pGNcEB7BCc9qW4eZarXj/3ztKzCCBjQwggQcoAMCAQICAR4w DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwfTELMAkGA1UEBhMCSUwxFjAUBgNVBAoTDVN0YXJ0Q29tIEx0ZC4xKzAp BgNVBAsTIlNlY3VyZSBEaWdpdGFsIENlcnRpZmljYXRlIFNpZ25pbmcxKTAnBgNVBAMTIFN0YXJ0 Q29tIENlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gQXV0aG9yaXR5MB4XDTA3MTAyNDIxMDE1NVoXDTE3MTAyNDIxMDE1 NVowgYwxCzAJBgNVBAYTAklMMRYwFAYDVQQKEw1TdGFydENvbSBMdGQuMSswKQYDVQQLEyJTZWN1 cmUgRGlnaXRhbCBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTaWduaW5nMTgwNgYDVQQDEy9TdGFydENvbSBDbGFzcyAx IFByaW1hcnkgSW50ZXJtZWRpYXRlIENsaWVudCBDQTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCC AQoCggEBAMcJg8zOLdgasSmkLhOrlr6KMoOMpohBllVHrdRvEg/q6r8jR+EK75xCGhR8ToREoqe7 zM9/UnC6TS2y9UKTpT1v7RSMzR0t6ndl0TWBuUr/UXBhPk+Kmy7bI4yW4urC+y7P3/1/X7U8ocb8 VpH/Clt+4iq7nirMcNh6qJR+xjOhV+VHzQMALuGYn5KZmc1NbJQYclsGkDxDz2UbFqE2+6vIZoL+ jb9x4Pa5gNf1TwSDkOkikZB1xtB4ZqtXThaABSONdfmv/Z1pua3FYxnCFmdr/+N2JLKutIxMYqQO Jebr/f/h5t95m4JgrM3Y/w7YX9d7YAL9jvN4SydHsU6n65cCAwEAAaOCAa0wggGpMA8GA1UdEwEB /wQFMAMBAf8wDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgEGMB0GA1UdDgQWBBRTcu2SnODaywFcfH6WNU7y1LhRgjAf BgNVHSMEGDAWgBROC+8apEBbpRdphzDKNGhD0EGu8jBmBggrBgEFBQcBAQRaMFgwJwYIKwYBBQUH MAGGG2h0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9jYTAtBggrBgEFBQcwAoYhaHR0cDovL3d3dy5z dGFydHNzbC5jb20vc2ZzY2EuY3J0MFsGA1UdHwRUMFIwJ6AloCOGIWh0dHA6Ly93d3cuc3RhcnRz c2wuY29tL3Nmc2NhLmNybDAnoCWgI4YhaHR0cDovL2NybC5zdGFydHNzbC5jb20vc2ZzY2EuY3Js MIGABgNVHSAEeTB3MHUGCysGAQQBgbU3AQIBMGYwLgYIKwYBBQUHAgEWImh0dHA6Ly93d3cuc3Rh cnRzc2wuY29tL3BvbGljeS5wZGYwNAYIKwYBBQUHAgEWKGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuc3RhcnRzc2wuY29t L2ludGVybWVkaWF0ZS5wZGYwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADggIBAAqDCH14qywGXLhjjF6uHLkjd02h cdh9hrw+VUsv+q1eeQWB21jWj3kJ96AUlPCoEGZ/ynJNScWy6QMVQjbbMXltUfO4n4bGGdKo3awP Wp61tjAFgraLJgDk+DsSvUD6EowjMTNx25GQgyYJ5RPIzKKR9tQW8gGK+2+RHxkUCTbYFnL6kl8C h507rUdPPipJ9CgJFws3kDS3gOS5WFMxcjO5DwKfKSETEPrHh7p5shuuNktvsv6hxHTLhiMKX893 gxdT3XLS9OKmCv87vkINQcNEcIIoFWbP9HORz9v3vQwR4e3ksLc2JZOAFK+ssS5XMEoznzpihEP0 PLc4dCBYjbvSD7kxgDwZ+Aj8Q9PkbvE9sIPP7ON0fz095HdThKjiVJe6vofq+n6b1NBc8XdrQvBm unwxD5nvtTW4vtN6VY7mUCmxsCieuoBJ9OlqmsVWQvifIYf40dJPZkk9YgGTzWLpXDSfLSplbY2L L9C9U0ptvjcDjefLTvqSFc7tw1sEhF0n/qpA2r0GpvkLRDmcSwVyPvmjFBGqUp/pNy8ZuPGQmHwF i2/14+xeSUDG2bwnsYJQG2EdJCB6luQ57GEnTA/yKZSTKI8dDQa8Sd3zfXb19mOgSF0bBdXbuKhE puP9wirslFe6fQ1t5j5R0xi72MZ8ikMu1RQZKCyDbMwazlHiMYIDfzCCA3sCAQEwgZQwgYwxCzAJ BgNVBAYTAklMMRYwFAYDVQQKEw1TdGFydENvbSBMdGQuMSswKQYDVQQLEyJTZWN1cmUgRGlnaXRh bCBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTaWduaW5nMTgwNgYDVQQDEy9TdGFydENvbSBDbGFzcyAxIFByaW1hcnkg SW50ZXJtZWRpYXRlIENsaWVudCBDQQIDDl3GMA0GCWCGSAFlAwQCAQUAoIIBuzAYBgkqhkiG9w0B CQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJBTEPFw0xNjAxMDYyMDA0MzZaMC8GCSqGSIb3DQEJ BDEiBCB49pk1nrPx7CfguS22JezK0pkA6Fw2dda61rZKjiA+aTCBpQYJKwYBBAGCNxAEMYGXMIGU MIGMMQswCQYDVQQGEwJJTDEWMBQGA1UEChMNU3RhcnRDb20gTHRkLjErMCkGA1UECxMiU2VjdXJl IERpZ2l0YWwgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2lnbmluZzE4MDYGA1UEAxMvU3RhcnRDb20gQ2xhc3MgMSBQ cmltYXJ5IEludGVybWVkaWF0ZSBDbGllbnQgQ0ECAw5dxjCBpwYLKoZIhvcNAQkQAgsxgZeggZQw gYwxCzAJBgNVBAYTAklMMRYwFAYDVQQKEw1TdGFydENvbSBMdGQuMSswKQYDVQQLEyJTZWN1cmUg RGlnaXRhbCBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTaWduaW5nMTgwNgYDVQQDEy9TdGFydENvbSBDbGFzcyAxIFBy aW1hcnkgSW50ZXJtZWRpYXRlIENsaWVudCBDQQIDDl3GMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIBAFhlPSOI 0yOX3L9/4znhUtD/qRdpQz5bQddyhtf3YbpLfQAgyh9ubgjQfRJd1qas4cOf6Q/nMXsMHM9SSCsr vNWQlZP9bA+0xKmye7TlxuSD+0HlJJ01I9ozD/k3vuGAlzf5AriIRu+DXrnAWYbg4I0Irf+EEuv8 6xBfurnRvEWpmE9oS6oHdjWlZi0DDNYlQEw3kN9aG4wbqwOaw7n611WX+VILuJWJukV9kFxPIAz3 Qk+Wi9Yq56ZIUpFx6F6jk18Fgmk0uhR11vIRHFeqTNrWKVhnKO+Wgyg9yHq/3yT+Q2naKVrNcetT l3MuMuzEv4EM+GcPDriRsrJauBkh8FwAAAAAAAA= --=-8XcWTewhRE9qax85kFoj-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jan 7 02:09:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03F8AA6523F for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 02:09:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from khitai.pang@outlook.com) Received: from BLU004-OMC4S35.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s35.hotmail.com [65.55.111.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD4EF10CA for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 02:09:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from khitai.pang@outlook.com) Received: from BLU437-SMTP82 ([65.55.111.137]) by BLU004-OMC4S35.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Wed, 6 Jan 2016 18:08:13 -0800 X-TMN: [L7c9HsnlbV2xWpXPE5KJWacnm90/ZPKe] X-Originating-Email: [khitai.pang@outlook.com] Message-ID: Subject: Re: building smbfs: undefined reference To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: Khitai Pang Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 10:08:19 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Jan 2016 02:08:12.0572 (UTC) FILETIME=[431C15C0:01D148F0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 02:09:21 -0000 Does anyone has any clue? Thanks in advance Khitai On 2016/1/4 1:33, Khitai Pang wrote: > I tried mount_smbfs from ports net/samba-smbclient but got the > following error: > > mount_smbfs: kldload(smbfs): No such file or directory > > So I added 'options SMBFS' in my kernel config file, and kernel > building failed: > > /var/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:(.text+0x94): undefined reference to > `smb_makescred' > /var/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:(.text+0x367): undefined reference to > `smb_makescred' > /var/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:(.text+0x37a): undefined reference to > `smb_read' > smbfs_io.o: In function `smbfs_vinvalbuf': > /var/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:(.text+0x6cb): undefined reference to > `smb_td_intr' > ... > > A lot of undefined references. By simple grep I found that the > missing functions are in sys/netsmb, so maybe I should also add > 'options NETSMB'? Anything else? Where can I find documentation > about this? > > > Thanks > Khitai From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jan 7 05:19:31 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD61DA6547D for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 05:19:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cursos@barradecomercio.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F2C1F9A for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 05:19:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cursos@barradecomercio.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C627BA6547C; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 05:19:31 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B83A6547B for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 05:19:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cursos@barradecomercio.org) Received: from core-215-7-server.dyd.es (core-215-7-server.dyd.es [93.159.215.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1CA1F99 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 05:19:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cursos@barradecomercio.org) To: From: "Capacitaciones" Reply-To: "Capacitaciones" Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 06:18:43 +0100 Message-ID: <57550d04000202000253590a0f005a5550005651500805535655000406065a515500070e050c010a09525505020a54@barradecomercio_ip-zone_com-6> X-CcmId: 07004745525d55505f0b0440555b0e3a0b16181b5d5f533e505c540a040551545d590c0508080907 Feedback-ID: 24833:24833-194:1:Mailrelay X-Report-Abuse: Please report abuse for this campaign here http://barradecomercio.mailrelay-ii.com/ccm/abuse?a=24833&m=194&s=890554 X-OriginalSender: cursos@barradecomercio.org Subject: Inicia 2016 estudiando Comercio Exterior. Solicita tu descuento MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 05:19:32 -0000 =0AInicia 2016 estudiando Comercio Exterior. Solicita tu descuento =09=09 =09=09=09=C2=BFNo puedes ver el correo correctamente?=C2=A0Da click aqu= =C3=AD para la versi=C3=B3n en internet =09=09 =09=09=09Diplomado on-line de Comercio Exterior.=0APromoci=C3=B3n por pago= =C2=A0en una sola exhibici=C3=B3n=C2=A0 =09=09 =09=09=09 =09=09El objetivo del Diplomado on-line de Comercio Exterior es facilitar e= l estudio de las disposiciones aduaneras, a trav=C3=A9s de un m=C3=A9todo d= id=C3=A1ctico en el cual se le permite el acceso al estudiante a las clases= impartidas por los maestros mediante videos que puede consultar en cualqui= er momento, lecturas previas, pr=C3=A1cticas, y evaluaciones semanales con = un sistema de calificaci=C3=B3n inmediata que permite medir el avance de fo= rma clara y sencilla en un total de 20 sesiones.=0A=0A=0A=0A =09=09Se incluyen salas virtuales de consulta con los profesores para aclar= ar dudas que surjan sobre la aplicaci=C3=B3n de las disposiciones legales q= ue rigen nuestro sistema aduanero, con la certeza y precisi=C3=B3n que se r= equiere para evitar problemas en el despacho de las mercanc=C3=ADas, visita= s domiciliarias, revisi=C3=B3n de mercanc=C3=ADas en transporte y facultade= s de comprobaci=C3=B3n por parte de las autoridades fiscales y aduaneras.= =0A =09=09=C2=A0 =09=09 =09=09=09=0A=0AInscripci=C3=B3nes:=0A=0ALic. Alejandra Hern=C3=A1ndez Mej= =C3=ADa=0A =09=09=09=C2=A0 =09=09 =09=09=09(55) 57.61.64.06 / 01.800.823.95.64 =09=09 =09=09=09ahernandez@barradecomercio.org.mx=0A=0ADescarga hoja de=C2=A0promo= ci=C3=B3n =09=09=0A=0ABarra Nacional de Comercio Exterior=C2=AE 2016 Todos los derech= os reservados =09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09Eliminar Contacto =09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09Agregar Contacto =09=09=09=09=0A=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jan 7 13:24:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCBF2A663E9 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 13:24:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@rotemmusic.com) Received: from mtaout25.012.net.il (mtaout25.012.net.il [80.179.55.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 087691CF1 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 13:24:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@rotemmusic.com) Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout25.012.net.il by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0O0L00O003FDA400@mtaout25.012.net.il> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 15:14:36 +0200 (IST) Received: from 173-170-234-138.res.bhn.net ([173.170.234.138]) by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPSA id <0O0L00FAE3G7WA80@mtaout25.012.net.il> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 15:14:36 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 08:18:31 -0500 From: Rotem Hecht Subject: Music composer for film, games and Tv commercials X-012-Sender: rotemmusic@012.net.il To: freebsd-questions Reply-to: "contact@rotemmusic.com" Message-id: <0O0L00FB43GBWA80@mtaout25.012.net.il> Organization: Rotem Hecht MIME-version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 13:24:05 -0000 Hi=20 =20 I hope you well =20 I am Rotem Hecht. I work as a professional music composer and sound d= esigner, I'm based in Florida these days, and working with production companies all over the world. I compose original music for movies, television commercials, video gam= es, corporate films and more. My portfolio includes projects performed for Microsoft, Hershey's, Kre= -O, Hasbro, Mercedes, Audi, Nickelodeon, Hop! TV Channel and more =20 I=E2=80=99m capable of delivering high quality products at decent rate= s and in short period of time. I would like to offer you my services. Please check my portfolio on my= website www.rotemmusic.com =20 Thank You for your time. =20 All The Best , =20 Rotem Hecht Mob:(+1) 323-557-0733 rotemhecht@gmail.com Skype: rhecht1282=20 =20 Unsubscribe From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jan 7 15:23:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE639A662EA for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 15:23:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@chroot.pl) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3429132F for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 15:23:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@chroot.pl) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A28CDA662E9; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 15:23:53 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21E2A662E8 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 15:23:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@chroot.pl) Received: from mail.apsz.com.pl (mail.apsz.com.pl [91.217.18.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 696BB132E for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 15:23:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@chroot.pl) Received: from chroot.pl (89-78-33-126.dynamic.chello.pl [89.78.33.126]) by mail.apsz.com.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99FEA45614 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 16:15:58 +0100 (CET) To: questions@freebsd.org From: FreeBSD Subject: samba and file locks Message-ID: <568E80EF.4090001@chroot.pl> Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 16:14:55 +0100 User-Agent: WebMail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_50,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail.apsz.com.pl X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at mail.apsz.com.pl X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Level: ** X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 15:23:53 -0000 Hello, I have a problem with file locks on share. My server is running FreeBSD 10.2 (amd64), samba 4.3.3 (ROLE_ACTIVE_DIRECTORY_DC) and ZFS pool (raidz) as a windows share. There is a strange behavior when I open a file from one windows workstation (smbstatus shows DENY_WRITE and everything seems right) and after about 5 minutes later I open the same file, which is still edited on first computer, from other windows workstation. At this moment I should see a warning message which inform that the file is going to be opened in read-only mode but nothing happen. The file is opened normally in read-write mode, so I can write into this file from both workstations at the same time overwriting data! It looks like the file lock doesn't work any more. log.smbd shows: ../source3/smbd/close.c:268(close_remove_share_mode) close_remove_share_mode: Could not get share mode lock for file data/filename I noticed the same situation with share based on UFS. Below is my smb4.conf. [global] dos charset = CP852 unix charset = ISO8859-2 workgroup = WORKGROUP realm = somedomain.int server role = active directory domain controller passdb backend = samba_dsdb min receivefile size = 16384 kernel change notify = No dns forwarder = 192.168.1.1 nsupdate command = /usr/local/bin/samba-nsupdate -g rpc_server:tcpip = no rpc_daemon:spoolssd = embedded rpc_server:spoolss = embedded rpc_server:winreg = embedded rpc_server:ntsvcs = embedded rpc_server:eventlog = embedded rpc_server:srvsvc = embedded rpc_server:svcctl = embedded rpc_server:default = external winbindd:use external pipes = true idmap config nc:range = 10000-20000 idmap config nc:backend = ad idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes idmap config * : backend = tdb aio read size = 16384 aio write size = 16384 aio write behind = true write cache size = 262144 map archive = No map readonly = no store dos attributes = Yes vfs objects = dfs_samba4 acl_xattr [sysvol] path = /var/db/samba4/sysvol read only = No vfs objects = acl_xattr [SHARE1] comment = SHARE1 path = /mnt/zfs_share/SHARE1 read only = No guest ok = Yes map acl inherit = Yes oplocks = No level2 oplocks = No vfs objects = zfsacl nfs4:chown = Yes nfs4:acedup = dontcare nfs4:mode = simple Is this a bug in samba? Or I missed something. Thank you for any suggestions. Regards Lukasz From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jan 7 18:44:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D69AA674EC for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 18:44:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@odo.in-berlin.de) Received: from mx1.enfer-du-nord.net (mx1.enfer-du-nord.net [IPv6:2001:41d0:1008:bcb:1:1:0:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D407E1A86 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 18:44:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@odo.in-berlin.de) From: Michael Grimm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: soft restart of a jail Message-Id: Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 19:44:08 +0100 To: freebsd-questions Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at mail X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 18:44:21 -0000 Hi =E2=80=94 I recently migrated regular jails to VNET jails, and I am pretty much = pleased about their new opportunities. During that exercise I ran across the sysutils/iocage jail managment = system, where I first read about a feature called "soft restart of a = jail". If I understand it correctly, here one doesn't remove/start a = jail including its network stack, but one only restarts a jail's = "content", instead. I did try to understand iocage's code, but I am unsure whether I got it = right: previously defined routing is removed, followed by a /bin/sh = /etc/rc.shutdown and /bin/sh /etc/rc, and finalized by a = reimplementation of a previously removed routing. (I hope that I got = that right.) Here my question: wouldn't a "/bin/sh /etc/rc.shutdown ; /bin/sh = /etc/rc" be sufficient? Is it necessary to remove/reinstall routing as = well? Again: I might be completely misunderstandig the code of iocage, thus my = questions to those with more knowledge. Thanks and regards, Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jan 7 20:07:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB88BA6777C for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 20:07:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from afiskon@devzen.ru) Received: from relay16.nicmail.ru (relay16.nicmail.ru [195.208.5.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA551B8D for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 20:07:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from afiskon@devzen.ru) Received: from [109.70.25.43] (port=65246 helo=nicmail.ru) by f17.mail.nic.ru with esmtp (Exim 5.55) (envelope-from ) id 1aHGYr-0004rd-4e for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 22:49:29 +0300 Received: from [10.0.6.227] (account afiskon@devzen.ru HELO fujitsu) by fcgp01.nicmail.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.3) with ESMTPA id 387953018 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 22:49:29 +0300 Received: from [188.123.231.37] (account afiskon@devzen.ru HELO fujitsu) by proxy07.mail.nic.ru (Exim 5.55) with id 1aHGYr-00080u-8j for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 22:49:29 +0300 Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 22:47:30 +0300 From: Eax Melanhovich To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD 10.2 and OpenGL 3.3 on Intel HD Graphics 4000 Message-ID: <20160107224730.7839b41d@fujitsu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 20:07:28 -0000 Hello, all A few years ago I used FreeBSD on a desktop. Now there is a whole week of holidays here in Russia and since I was quite bored I decided to check status of FreeBSD as a desktop system once again. I must admit FreeBSD is now much better in this regard than it was back in 2009. Still I faced a problem I hope you could help me with. I'm currently learning OpenGL and first thing I tried to do right after installing desktop environment was to compile this project: https://github.com/afiskon/c-opengl-text Unfortunately there are some compatibility issues with clang in dependent libraries so I used gcc. Here is a problem. I installed FreeBSD 10.2 RELEASE on Toshiba Portege Z930-DKS laptop which has Intel HD Graphics 4000. This code: // demo/main.c glfwDefaultWindowHints(); glfwWindowHint(GLFW_OPENGL_PROFILE, GLFW_OPENGL_CORE_PROFILE); glfwWindowHint(GLFW_CONTEXT_VERSION_MAJOR, 3); glfwWindowHint(GLFW_CONTEXT_VERSION_MINOR, 3); glfwWindowHint(GLFW_OPENGL_FORWARD_COMPAT, GL_TRUE); glfwWindowHint(GLFW_SAMPLES, 4); resources->window = glfwCreateWindow(800, 600, "Demo", NULL, NULL); if(resources->window == NULL) { fprintf(stderr, "Failed to open GLFW window\n"); return -1; } Returns with error and following output: ERROR: code = 65543, descr = The requested client API version is unavailable Failed to open GLFW window I traced a problem to this point: (gdb) bt #0 errorCallback (code=65543, descr=0x41ea78 "The requested client API version is unavailable") at /home/eax/projects/c/c-opengl-text/demo/main.c:74 #1 0x000000000040ac6f in _glfwInputError (error=65543, format=0x0) at /home/eax/projects/c/c-opengl-text/glfw/src/init.c:111 #2 0x000000000040a6b4 in _glfwIsValidContext (ctxconfig=0x7fffffffe960) at /home/eax/projects/c/c-opengl-text/glfw/src/context.c:507 #3 0x000000000040d75f in glfwCreateWindow (width=800, height=600, title=0x41db99 "Demo", monitor=0x0, share=0x0) at /home/eax/projects/c/c-opengl-text/glfw/src/window.c:206 #4 0x000000000040419b in commonResourcesCreate (resources=0x7fffffffea30) at /home/eax/projects/c/c-opengl-text/demo/main.c:102 #5 0x00000000004068c7 in main () at /home/eax/projects/c/c-opengl-text/demo/main.c:806 Closer look to frame #2 shows that window->context.{major,minor} values are {3,2}. In other words this code requires OpenGL 3.3 but only OpenGL 3.2 can be provided. So my question is - does FreeBSD support OpenGL 3.3 on Intel HD Graphics 4000? Are there any drivers I need to install or something like this? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jan 7 21:15:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D816A6741B for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 21:15:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noc@hdk5.net) Received: from relay10.netenterprise.net (relay10.netenterprise.net [66.180.133.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD7D1F9F for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 21:15:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noc@hdk5.net) X-Envelope-From: noc@hdk5.net X-Envelope-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: From imail5.netenterprise.net (64.29.90.135) by relay10.netenterprise.net (MAILFOUNDRY) id LKpDRrV7EeWAYgAl for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 20:13:54 -0000 (GMT) Received: from ponolei.intra.net [72.235.61.32] by IMAIL5.netenterprise.net with ESMTP (SMTPD-12.5.3.93) id 894a000302733e56; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 10:07:08 -1000 Message-ID: <568EC56D.5060103@hdk5.net> Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 10:07:09 -1000 From: al plant User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071128 FreeBSD/i386 SeaMonkey/1.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Subject: help with making DVD install disc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 21:15:23 -0000 Aloha List, I need to make a .iso dvd 11 to test hardware. How do I locate a i386 copy like below with a dvd designation instead of disc1 or has something changed since I did this a while ago? FreeBSD-11.0-CURRENT-i386-20160106-r293245-disc1.iso I looked at handbook but couldnt find the how to for this. See the dvd under releases but I want to test 11 for this email desktop hardware. Happy New Year Thanks ~ Al Plant - Honolulu, Hawaii - Phone: 808-284-2740 ~ Supporting FreeBSD - UNIX Computer O/S email: noc@hdk5.net email: alplant.att.net ."All that's really worth doing is what we do for others" - Lewis Carrol From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jan 7 21:38:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9561A67B9F for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 21:38:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FD9F1F1D for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 21:38:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aHIFq-0001VB-8F for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 22:37:58 +0100 Received: from 5e1bb79d.mobile.pool.telekom.hu ([94.27.183.157]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 22:37:58 +0100 Received: from leventelist by 5e1bb79d.mobile.pool.telekom.hu with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 22:37:58 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Lev Subject: update Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 22:37:38 +0100 Lines: 5 Message-ID: <20160107223738.1b874bba@jive.levalinux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 5e1bb79d.mobile.pool.telekom.hu X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.1) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 21:38:09 -0000 SGkgbGlzdCwNCg0KDQpJIGhhdmUgMTAuMi1SRUxFQVNFLXAyIGFuZCBJIGRvDQoNCmZyZWVic2Qt dXBkYXRlIGZldGNoDQoNCmFuZCBpdCBzYXlzOg0KDQpObyB1cGRhdGVzIG5lZWRlZCB0byB1cGRh dGUgc3lzdGVtIHRvIDEwLjItUkVMRUFTRS1wOC4NCg0KU28gaG93IGNhbiBJIHVwZGF0ZSB0cCBw OD8NCg0KVGhhbmtzLA0KTGV2DQoNCi0tIA0KNzMgZGUgSEE1T0dMDQpPcC46IExldmVudGUNCg== From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jan 7 22:12:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0D5FA66B27 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 22:12:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) Received: from radel.com (fly.radel.com [70.184.242.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "*.radel.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B7901846 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 22:12:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) X-CGP-ClamAV-Result: CLEAN X-VirusScanner: Niversoft's CGPClamav Helper v1.18.7 (ClamAV engine v0.98.7) Received: from [2001:470:880a:4389:307d:8f36:ae95:99a9] (account jon@radel.com HELO gravenstein.local) by radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.2 _community_) with ESMTPSA id 971151 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 22:11:55 +0000 Subject: Re: update To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20160107223738.1b874bba@jive.levalinux.org> From: Jon Radel Message-ID: <568EE2AA.2010301@radel.com> Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 17:11:54 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160107223738.1b874bba@jive.levalinux.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="------------ms070808050107050808000104" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 22:12:03 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms070808050107050808000104 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 1/7/16 4:37 PM, Lev wrote: > Hi list, > > > I have 10.2-RELEASE-p2 and I do > > freebsd-update fetch > > and it says: > > No updates needed to update system to 10.2-RELEASE-p8. > > So how can I update tp p8? > And what does freebsd-version -ku say you have? There are two p numbers in play, kernel and userland, and = they're frequently not in sync if you use freebsd-update. See the man=20 pages for the two commands for more, particularly the implementation=20 notes section for freebsd-version. Or to put it another way, freebsd-update says you're running=20 10.2-RELEASE-p8, so, no, you can't update to 10.2-RELEASE-p8. --Jon Radel jon@radel.com --------------ms070808050107050808000104 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExDzANBglghkgBZQMEAgEFADCABgkqhkiG9w0BBwEAAKCC Cq8wggSvMIIDl6ADAgECAhEA4CPLFRKDU4mtYW56VGdrITANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFADBvMQsw CQYDVQQGEwJTRTEUMBIGA1UEChMLQWRkVHJ1c3QgQUIxJjAkBgNVBAsTHUFkZFRydXN0IEV4 dGVybmFsIFRUUCBOZXR3b3JrMSIwIAYDVQQDExlBZGRUcnVzdCBFeHRlcm5hbCBDQSBSb290 MB4XDTE0MTIyMjAwMDAwMFoXDTIwMDUzMDEwNDgzOFowgZsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYD VQQIExJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcTB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNP TU9ETyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMUEwPwYDVQQDEzhDT01PRE8gU0hBLTI1NiBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVu dGljYXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBDQTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCC AQoCggEBAImxDdp6UxlOcFIdvFamBia3uEngludRq/HwWhNJFaO0jBtgvHpRQqd5jKQi3xdh TpHVdiMKFNNKAn+2HQmAbqUEPdm6uxb+oYepLkNSQxZ8rzJQyKZPWukI2M+TJZx7iOgwZOak +FaA/SokFDMXmaxE5WmLo0YGS8Iz1OlAnwawsayTQLm1CJM6nCpToxDbPSBhPFUDjtlOdiUC ISn6o3xxdk/u4V+B6ftUgNvDezVSt4TeIj0sMC0xf1m9UjewM2ktQ+v61qXxl3dnUYzZ7ifr vKUHOHaMpKk4/9+M9QOsSb7K93OZOg8yq5yVOhM9DkY6V3RhUL7GQD/L5OKfoiECAwEAAaOC ARcwggETMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFK29mHo0tCb3+sQmVO8DveAky1QaMB0GA1UdDgQWBBSSYWuC 4aKgqk/sZ/HCo/e0gADB7DAOBgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMCAYYwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADAd BgNVHSUEFjAUBggrBgEFBQcDAgYIKwYBBQUHAwQwEQYDVR0gBAowCDAGBgRVHSAAMEQGA1Ud HwQ9MDswOaA3oDWGM2h0dHA6Ly9jcmwudXNlcnRydXN0LmNvbS9BZGRUcnVzdEV4dGVybmFs Q0FSb290LmNybDA1BggrBgEFBQcBAQQpMCcwJQYIKwYBBQUHMAGGGWh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLnVz ZXJ0cnVzdC5jb20wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQELBQADggEBABsqbqxVwTqriMXY7c1V86prYSvACRAj mQ/FZmpvsfW0tXdeDwJhAN99Bf4Ss6SAgAD8+x1banICCkG8BbrBWNUmwurVTYT7/oKYz1gb 4yJjnFL4uwU2q31Ypd6rO2Pl2tVz7+zg+3vio//wQiOcyraNTT7kSxgDsqgt1Ni7QkuQaYUQ 26Y3NOh74AEQpZzKOsefT4g0bopl0BqKu6ncyso20fT8wmQpNa/WsadxEdIDQ7GPPprsnjJT 9HaSyoY0B7ksyuYcStiZDcGG4pCS+1pCaiMhEOllx/XVu37qjIUgAmLq0ToHLFnFmTPyOInl tukWeh95FPZKEBom+nyK+5swggX4MIIE4KADAgECAhBzVOU8fWu0zQ1gaQ38zgEbMA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBCwUAMIGbMQswCQYDVQQGEwJHQjEbMBkGA1UECBMSR3JlYXRlciBNYW5jaGVzdGVy MRAwDgYDVQQHEwdTYWxmb3JkMRowGAYDVQQKExFDT01PRE8gQ0EgTGltaXRlZDFBMD8GA1UE AxM4Q09NT0RPIFNIQS0yNTYgQ2xpZW50IEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBTZWN1cmUgRW1h aWwgQ0EwHhcNMTUwMzMwMDAwMDAwWhcNMTgwMzI5MjM1OTU5WjCB+jELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMx DjAMBgNVBBETBTIyMTUwMQswCQYDVQQIEwJWQTEUMBIGA1UEBxMLU3ByaW5nZmllbGQxGjAY BgNVBAkTETY5MTcgUmlkZ2V3YXkgRHIuMRUwEwYDVQQKEwxKb24gVC4gUmFkZWwxMjAwBgNV BAsTKUlzc3VlZCB0aHJvdWdoIEpvbiBULiBSYWRlbCBFLVBLSSBNYW5hZ2VyMR8wHQYDVQQL ExZDb3Jwb3JhdGUgU2VjdXJlIEVtYWlsMRIwEAYDVQQDEwlKb24gUmFkZWwxHDAaBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQEWDWpvbkByYWRlbC5jb20wggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQDe 1Rth9hbQqaODn++C5dVAQH9nM2VH3oPazZufOwmIG2SXI/v3PuemcQQ3JkhmpQ06gYszyXbk TCLsqvEfalYj81jdt/K5lT4aVdj0LfJIWyTcU95V2rsCuHsSvn/PnIcsEtXg53rCtqS4EOtJ 9u3rY2hP8YCiyz1yY3mn4nKJs93MHG4AkXYuVpzfaIADETcVrA+razvXEfnDJXXDZZ9ZuuV1 06yIovOvhYWSlaVu8nrSHJjXFZI2IXwgIeVBoMih3yu6LLj14I/YdZ0rIA8K+UNB+NW6Ri3u wHXBbr4jh3ZqkrqIVUrf1VeybhdrJcdqXdMNHjKDSlCoaxYRbLy1AgMBAAGjggHVMIIB0TAf BgNVHSMEGDAWgBSSYWuC4aKgqk/sZ/HCo/e0gADB7DAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUz9YB10WEfBNHskRw o/0vh8qaQuwwDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgWgMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwHQYDVR0lBBYwFAYIKwYB BQUHAwQGCCsGAQUFBwMCMEYGA1UdIAQ/MD0wOwYMKwYBBAGyMQECAQMFMCswKQYIKwYBBQUH AgEWHWh0dHBzOi8vc2VjdXJlLmNvbW9kby5uZXQvQ1BTMF0GA1UdHwRWMFQwUqBQoE6GTGh0 dHA6Ly9jcmwuY29tb2RvY2EuY29tL0NPTU9ET1NIQTI1NkNsaWVudEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9u YW5kU2VjdXJlRW1haWxDQS5jcmwwgZAGCCsGAQUFBwEBBIGDMIGAMFgGCCsGAQUFBzAChkxo dHRwOi8vY3J0LmNvbW9kb2NhLmNvbS9DT01PRE9TSEEyNTZDbGllbnRBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlv bmFuZFNlY3VyZUVtYWlsQ0EuY3J0MCQGCCsGAQUFBzABhhhodHRwOi8vb2NzcC5jb21vZG9j YS5jb20wGAYDVR0RBBEwD4ENam9uQHJhZGVsLmNvbTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFAAOCAQEAS1Pe +gBgP+SQ/a5I5e7zX0Rg0DhH378LHlZixJgS6LfCPL2edKMUQi3Th9GXfLjdeyeWuMWoz925 ZzBHcPwkBeH+iM/AEhu0Dhi0kop/p66g9tEPJUZ/KDsqxddNDrD0Typn3/33pHTjJEDqydzA gwB0Nn8blpMbqSwT+j8wuPakfLsj1cSDzXrTLLsmIQB7auAyaYXdWyW8Yqw336rLUCvjOUfn qOOyjVsieTw/0PLoOHJaGyez+VtV4eyi6p1SNiX32A+fvxBMzKQLCokE43cXItc9Okzq//f2 fuvGp17r8mpm4OjjM5E2kwsg9bBPUBMR4/sxosKVLn0o9rxlozGCBEEwggQ9AgEBMIGwMIGb MQswCQYDVQQGEwJHQjEbMBkGA1UECBMSR3JlYXRlciBNYW5jaGVzdGVyMRAwDgYDVQQHEwdT YWxmb3JkMRowGAYDVQQKExFDT01PRE8gQ0EgTGltaXRlZDFBMD8GA1UEAxM4Q09NT0RPIFNI QS0yNTYgQ2xpZW50IEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBTZWN1cmUgRW1haWwgQ0ECEHNU5Tx9 a7TNDWBpDfzOARswDQYJYIZIAWUDBAIBBQCgggJhMBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0B BwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTE2MDEwNzIyMTE1NFowLwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMSIEICIIIlwd A1axITuz/DGgm4b9b3XdtwcIY6t/KRKu9tmJMGwGCSqGSIb3DQEJDzFfMF0wCwYJYIZIAWUD BAEqMAsGCWCGSAFlAwQBAjAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZIhvcN AwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwgcEGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDGBszCBsDCBmzEL MAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNVBAgTEkdyZWF0ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBxMHU2Fs Zm9yZDEaMBgGA1UEChMRQ09NT0RPIENBIExpbWl0ZWQxQTA/BgNVBAMTOENPTU9ETyBTSEEt MjU2IENsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgU2VjdXJlIEVtYWlsIENBAhBzVOU8fWu0 zQ1gaQ38zgEbMIHDBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzGBs6CBsDCBmzELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNV BAgTEkdyZWF0ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBxMHU2FsZm9yZDEaMBgGA1UEChMRQ09N T0RPIENBIExpbWl0ZWQxQTA/BgNVBAMTOENPTU9ETyBTSEEtMjU2IENsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50 aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgU2VjdXJlIEVtYWlsIENBAhBzVOU8fWu0zQ1gaQ38zgEbMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBAQUABIIBAFK8eqW/xH3IMn81TjB21Ws4AKn8JlceaxG6wZZN38ImDp6mr4JJfxie/KjI wa8essezxlsISf2tdK9zBQI/vQqW4hK3GIuwPqMfx7lqd2Ld8i2KJ8Ud0xeM5rpQYohKl6g8 +dMKuweU09zvLtBijIDjBquK+bfYqkWk9aurt3Jjit71OX+bi18A+qlcKdebpmK0jVquYtkX UlVpXhZH7wLslUqYxsChyJ3zvbcY/Cd5lhmSKMyYQFhFk9uWAmaox/1+Bftf2Vx6qxEnig7R FpW0ki0ifLLYVXb9XHDMkIHFz3LvMCq9vv31F1zsVBiaWcrqH8lvkZuovYAoSa5nqKwAAAAA AAA= --------------ms070808050107050808000104-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jan 7 22:14:48 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 842FFA66C9A for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 22:14:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stoa@gmx.us) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E367B1C78 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 22:14:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stoa@gmx.us) Received: from archlinux ([24.116.197.15]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LpObx-1ZlYyo1X8f-00f6q5 for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 23:14:39 +0100 Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 16:14:29 -0600 From: Dutch Ingraham To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: update Message-ID: <20160107221429.GA15860@archlinux> References: <20160107223738.1b874bba@jive.levalinux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160107223738.1b874bba@jive.levalinux.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:gzJzf02g53frsSsX6eLQEtJn/Ya6XYFggoK8sq6ghvEWpi9Ovhk 57yqRxoT5Jg0Xw+I4b1FKwhTqIY2VfVD0Iv0JA5Xae8l0suswBQ+9JKG7qHzT8k0E3o0UGU bwURurILQ7ztOSaH8CK+J80svgWnLXX+9T+nE3r21i/nz921ZGv812lCNtXjJXRaAOl9I7C C2NYP1RDqu1DOZWV2gBfg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:u4u8vRlmObo=:TwVeky9L56MjCKyAFTkkzz YknBc8X7BJRs3EoA/1BeiLrrxeHp7FrBiHeHCvETvbTTUs1RCq+qHEmYlTXkYIzPZGwEk4S5M CxOIn/QhHWiC7+q79QRYneN8cw/5fSBqBprTHVcm0YjZCdulfSI6cqxULWoD9r5E3Cs9mFeaS VAgVp42ceezMGQX8mKuJs0QqfsGIdrJ3guJiQ0WidRVEO51dAXzKROw6oqPhOJvNX6spejkSL D/xpUY/7b3q2wztYvaIzxbesvRqsRRK1BckBJuHqJ6ybuAw61RpyEnRBPK2AdHP8O45/JQIIf fiB6PuJgumioRWZVO3+y6L/kUPbZYp/cHuEVHve5rDV5efEiDQFZrU8S8yMmLVx5Y3kv1YTEq 55xaoCTfzLB5VRjbk+ekNZ2areo/7d8eQxiM4oTU8uYd2eztfrjkV7go+L/HTLi+ONnGsXSH5 2ymOSPMTBx/qAA0F36Q1oAlNYmtHwc7LsQ6fKBbetoriN/kJou05KEubcScG3PrkkiKsQBpQH AEpelDnz0cozdRrQh+WjhygMiLYi0aWi6PEnS/cdMA/91bbHXWnsocB9CC6MdEkQNoH6LkSoJ WH9wHEB8NuPuS0u4LerPsn6TVz44ZjcKVucAAPdlr20tLSnZE1JMJd8elcFa4S5Rtv3tALN6i MjvzUj+oQ8nq05KvE1QUnUAFiRzvWEVpclqbR+bD4CtnU5XjdllzgxZmlpoLMZOgjQN+Pd+ZA 1HX6XXYizjJ96bhfO9Bnq+ZLS6p/CMu5GQBD3p/RnpvPriGI598RG/9lTNI= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 22:14:48 -0000 On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 10:37:38PM +0100, Lev wrote: > Hi list, > > > I have 10.2-RELEASE-p2 and I do > > freebsd-update fetch > > and it says: > > No updates needed to update system to 10.2-RELEASE-p8. > > So how can I update tp p8? > > Thanks, > Lev > What does the command return? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jan 7 22:16:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7524A66DB4 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 22:16:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-qg0-x230.google.com (mail-qg0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90DC51DE4 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 22:16:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: by mail-qg0-x230.google.com with SMTP id 6so260926286qgy.1 for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 14:16:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ocjA4LTk6oLsymRLboIFD8mODUDDjWrl2KRCAVtgzYA=; b=T3q2eJwpgPoVPObSueK8/3GiSzwSvUDMFXVw5RN3kquwqd1JXhRwVyP8V+elRT/dYH 3Fin2lLyj2mH/2Fsx0+CZ0KRBUfDsokdnhmeR1HUno+z9jfhg5nbLulyRity6IIWNyWz AfmTBIUIaOHScLIMP8nugMPu4q8j21k+SLVh8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:reply-to:organization:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ocjA4LTk6oLsymRLboIFD8mODUDDjWrl2KRCAVtgzYA=; b=Cx+KYhUxsSv/6xqWSbS68kL6ZT/HOEJzP3/g1ZCJSbMKfdbGtTVu+wcR00VG8zmNoU brR2wbvF2NsJrILNt7BTRjh7Z25YJhLo8unlHloW95R6L+YIhHwlgBrdvEejEF+2ZUVB 5nlN7kxsMR7M+VHHWNzEhRgcYzLx60PXl/v6FUeJzQ2V0ZHSh2GYF5OOrIZGiXPwxMK1 6OmKtMCUcjB4FpaqHAP9gvA/70DnO13HL1rzmr1AX0RE0I7T9QfpoG6x/Ce3ze/pC4vi 9CP97KxNtZeUmRiLtVjdihVS4C4YHsEE1NI+4qnpvY5s+nhpAq5f1t8/9m5sADn3yPrS u6DQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmwxRyqT5iePHZ3p6TsRt+6rDvGw9Z+7s5pdaqCod6M6CW9VKDYpp9ooDmx/WUL+OC3VxtNUjY/cIic1pVuzSPWgTJuow== X-Received: by 10.140.30.101 with SMTP id c92mr143350582qgc.14.1452205012611; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 14:16:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-174-109-28-112.nc.res.rr.com. [174.109.28.112]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g90sm46355687qgg.45.2016.01.07.14.16.52 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Jan 2016 14:16:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3pc23Q1yp5z3K0cD for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 17:16:50 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 17:16:49 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD FreeBSD Subject: Re: update Message-ID: <20160107171649.721d9a97@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <20160107223738.1b874bba@jive.levalinux.org> References: <20160107223738.1b874bba@jive.levalinux.org> Reply-To: FreeBSD FreeBSD Organization: seibercom NET X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.0 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.2) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 22:16:53 -0000 On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 22:37:38 +0100, Lev stated: > Hi list, > > > I have 10.2-RELEASE-p2 and I do > > freebsd-update fetch > > and it says: > > No updates needed to update system to 10.2-RELEASE-p8. > > So how can I update tp p8? > > Thanks, > Lev > Run: "freebsd-update" sans quotation marks and see what it says. Actually, it won't say anything, but it should show the actual version currently installed. -- Jerry From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jan 7 22:18:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05411A66E5A for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 22:18:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-qg0-x232.google.com (mail-qg0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B06F11EB7 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 22:17:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: by mail-qg0-x232.google.com with SMTP id 6so260947154qgy.1 for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 14:17:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=E75ETptywjiThbLLNFcdiPfanVktSj/9IUIYcCBFUU4=; b=NeJ/pBLNir/XgqMScWrYnL1YS/CzeM/yrAdab5cBMzZ83ZK3FNAAOl0bLNyGejRfGQ rFkrBj6lYwAFPiIurnEBgIZbuj3JVRDFPjnaROySjwMx4Fewok/36a3WdwbGiVFZTFxU JiYjKjk6JF2ZC0CEp9QwQ5H3fnVUHe15WRGgc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:reply-to:organization:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=E75ETptywjiThbLLNFcdiPfanVktSj/9IUIYcCBFUU4=; b=c6Hb1+nGvCzTHqmOU6YCZNbODChlFHZJmbU6vhK10mMSqRhKZPcwnibnv/OVcycDPb kauNTc/rpo8DyoDM0jT38gMgKu9AEFOlQd5GO/mrXsVaAAOu13IkFQzk/ORC4K5nbEDr 69zZFiWasLbZ2KU/vBMAUZV5EROEjv18kM+jqSRlrrI7XmWPuWva87u2yw1whJTuIb2U v/lYfpp5DTDunfeqL8BeLZqfGIlA5RLBKEEx72uiCYCuGyT8adYbEqoBtgywBpeCD82b ITS8gz3P6nnwIlkjy87Jk5LxwkSRr5qC1OKlumWRplyNRUP4Ih8kE9etTYVUDwrjUEa7 3mKg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnL2bP5I+lPb7HaW/8AgownG4J/BSJ+fF/xdjXxemh6l/GqebHarJ8ZIX4V1evvh2xv7IYl/VeYEDG9IdZmSN3+t3ucVQ== X-Received: by 10.140.129.203 with SMTP id 194mr67183529qhb.57.1452205078883; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 14:17:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-174-109-28-112.nc.res.rr.com. [174.109.28.112]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n91sm38597638qkh.11.2016.01.07.14.17.58 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Jan 2016 14:17:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3pc24h5sNVz3K0cD for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 17:17:56 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 17:17:56 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD FreeBSD Subject: Re: update Message-ID: <20160107171756.6cf7aa74@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <20160107223738.1b874bba@jive.levalinux.org> References: <20160107223738.1b874bba@jive.levalinux.org> Reply-To: FreeBSD FreeBSD Organization: seibercom NET X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.0 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.2) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 22:18:00 -0000 On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 22:37:38 +0100, Lev stated: > Hi list, > > > I have 10.2-RELEASE-p2 and I do > > freebsd-update fetch > > and it says: > > No updates needed to update system to 10.2-RELEASE-p8. > > So how can I update tp p8? > > Thanks, > Lev > Run: "freebsd-version" sans quotation marks and see what it says. Actually, it won't say anything, but it should show the actual version currently installed. -- Jerry From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jan 7 22:21:04 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D07A670EA for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 22:21:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAD43110D for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 22:21:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aHIvT-0008ND-HI for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 23:20:59 +0100 Received: from 5e1bb79d.mobile.pool.telekom.hu ([94.27.183.157]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 23:20:59 +0100 Received: from leventelist by 5e1bb79d.mobile.pool.telekom.hu with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 23:20:59 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Lev Subject: Re: update Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 23:20:50 +0100 Lines: 11 Message-ID: <20160107232050.140acee9@jive.levalinux.org> References: <20160107223738.1b874bba@jive.levalinux.org> <20160107221429.GA15860@archlinux> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 5e1bb79d.mobile.pool.telekom.hu X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.1) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 22:21:05 -0000 T24gVGh1LCA3IEphbiAyMDE2IDE2OjE0OjI5IC0wNjAwDQpEdXRjaCBJbmdyYWhhbSA8c3RvYUBn bXgudXM+IHdyb3RlOg0KDQo+IE9uIFRodSwgSmFuIDA3LCAyMDE2IGF0IDEwOjM3OjM4UE0gKzAx MDAsIExldiB3cm90ZToNCj4gPiBIaSBsaXN0LA0KPiA+IA0KPiA+IA0KPiA+IEkgaGF2ZSAxMC4y LVJFTEVBU0UtcDIgYW5kIEkgZG8NCj4gPiANCj4gPiBmcmVlYnNkLXVwZGF0ZSBmZXRjaA0KPiA+ IA0KPiA+IGFuZCBpdCBzYXlzOg0KPiA+IA0KPiA+IE5vIHVwZGF0ZXMgbmVlZGVkIHRvIHVwZGF0 ZSBzeXN0ZW0gdG8gMTAuMi1SRUxFQVNFLXA4Lg0KPiA+IA0KPiA+IFNvIGhvdyBjYW4gSSB1cGRh dGUgdHAgcDg/DQo+ID4gDQo+ID4gVGhhbmtzLA0KPiA+IExldg0KPiA+IA0KPiANCj4gV2hhdCBk b2VzIHRoZSBjb21tYW5kIDxmcmVlYnNkLXZlcnNpb24gLWt1PiByZXR1cm4/DQoNCkl0IHNheXMg dGhpczoNCg0KMTAuMi1SRUxFQVNFLXAyDQoxMC4yLVJFTEVBU0UtcDgNCg0KDQpPTUcuLi4uIHdo YXQgaXMgZ29pbmcgb24/DQoNCi0tIA0KNzMgZGUgSEE1T0dMDQpPcC46IExldmVudGUNCg== From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jan 7 22:35:39 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9158FA67676 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 22:35:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stoa@gmx.us) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E74C01E22 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 22:35:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stoa@gmx.us) Received: from archlinux ([24.116.197.15]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lm34j-1ZiFMx2wF7-00ZekL for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 23:30:19 +0100 Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 16:30:16 -0600 From: Dutch Ingraham To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: update Message-ID: <20160107223015.GB15860@archlinux> References: <20160107223738.1b874bba@jive.levalinux.org> <20160107221429.GA15860@archlinux> <20160107232050.140acee9@jive.levalinux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160107232050.140acee9@jive.levalinux.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:M7CnqK5TUfESxPZf0XCPfR9BqZtmt53LyMnGZ8BcRwOY7+zywTp RtVi25+JKuVO/B4CKzL4aH2NlIrEuKoHvo4qw7QgmjB2+pv2Yy54C0Cdj/8VT23pll467l9 X2RmpvPxEp8Kk44YW5bhnNiJpZbWNCPJ/9tg4KKVZjogL4jf0UQieRtw6+zVhAjDXMwQjte LJjmTcGNk05sPboaIXjEw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:LPH7B82oE14=:DYrxfJLBaN9h8A9BfVoEP+ vG42U8z1mQ+4sLRA28Q8xh4Czjq3F01MTj//uEh1eCeW+jGAj5llW27kTaSId+2I65jzOx+PL fB2j/Ac9rn/W+skYTnHK66yNihMvEufY39uUibx30I+lI3a49MX4HFduguqe+NLWJqScbt3Kp 6SBYTMkkafkDluOZ4bsrjMa6OuXrTImaMfeqSUSnkqjxUlT30edICP7rWmiuf5BYrjD2pm3Zg EKmnOHC+iEvWU74pflbb+0q/dnD1TVkiJwwH+3aKbTrbuE0k+ltkflqti/uxZNMvfQGiQ/Y49 GpDTOLNOrMA4R4F56XHggadIf9aRiGwzOafn1wFdvfLTyx3thyu8xH1RRZXiA3wjRzVTfsRLk xPgHzRKdgsEscDQutqm4BqDDVOShQuLdGv6eybprsqT/UP1uKZW6KKIAOnVj9OjAeB2J/kRJ/ Bdcz30hBZ33K0i6ySy0G0ViLshFBqxYg1vteqPS1H6FMBXKRZyHWHgqnH6tpO0p3vKe83pP66 GJtyB6ZWoE2naViuMrdxlylsvI8Du7njSQg1e29Db0JuYaKK5bXOSnfKPoxze35QIvjAs3BzO pLQj+cw54/YgPyy7O9SGk+/ghvqRiJN73NOlW9JYU/EtUEpj69LUvc//oMUGCodU1TJbSUtIm 5KCUZyekOwi0I0PxE6j8CdyOOp8ED2GIMw8/W8rfGGHtPgPLO6VI1jNFrJe7BXk7JJp3buC90 hjsQkf4w0dewLUMgcBNBT1ky5132yAJdDQvsPZWL4eyZ7qlSxkgn0ffuulo= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 22:35:39 -0000 On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 11:20:50PM +0100, Lev wrote: > On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 16:14:29 -0600 > Dutch Ingraham wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 10:37:38PM +0100, Lev wrote: > > > Hi list, > > > > > > > > > I have 10.2-RELEASE-p2 and I do > > > > > > freebsd-update fetch > > > > > > and it says: > > > > > > No updates needed to update system to 10.2-RELEASE-p8. > > > > > > So how can I update tp p8? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Lev > > > > > > > What does the command return? > > It says this: > > 10.2-RELEASE-p2 > 10.2-RELEASE-p8 > > > OMG.... what is going on? > Looks perfectly fine. The -k in that command returns the kernel patch version and the -u returns the userland patch version. It is common for the numbers to diverge, since there is rarely the same number of patches to the kernel as the userland. (Caveat: I don't have my Freebsd machine with me now, but I'm pretty sure kernel p2 and userland p8 are the most recent patch versions. Someone else can advise if this is incorrect.) From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jan 8 05:10:33 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C0BA66D66 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 05:10:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from uk1mail2513.mymailbank.co.uk (UK1MAIL2513-PERMANET.IE.mymailbank.co.uk [217.69.47.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B18FA176C for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 05:10:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from smtp.lan.sohara.org (UnknownHost [88.151.27.41]) by uk1mail2513-d.mymailbank.co.uk with SMTP; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 05:05:06 +0000 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.lan.sohara.org) by smtp.lan.sohara.org with smtp (Exim 4.85 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1aHPEU-0000OX-AH; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 05:05:02 +0000 Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 05:05:02 +0000 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: Lev Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: update Message-Id: <20160108050502.4512cc3a74ae262898d72ce9@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <20160107232050.140acee9@jive.levalinux.org> References: <20160107223738.1b874bba@jive.levalinux.org> <20160107221429.GA15860@archlinux> <20160107232050.140acee9@jive.levalinux.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.3 (GTK+ 2.24.28; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.1) X-Clacks-Overhead: "GNU Terry Pratchett" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 05:10:33 -0000 On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 23:20:50 +0100 Lev wrote: > It says this: > > 10.2-RELEASE-p2 > 10.2-RELEASE-p8 > > > OMG.... what is going on? Looks like you need to reboot, or rebuild your custom kernel if you have one. My recently updated 10.2 box says this: $ freebsd-version -ku 10.2-RELEASE-p7 10.2-RELEASE-p8 -- Steve O'Hara-Smith From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jan 8 10:00:47 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01AA5A68F3D for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 10:00:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com (mail-wm0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98498172E for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 10:00:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id f206so129578140wmf.0 for ; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 02:00:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=PFdTk+UhZaCECvRirwk+4siATEpJExNl9ZxOEtTc7GE=; b=sXHgMhRSSLOlb9OhWnXGYxWQnL1l1PoymUu3WZAOnBaNc4bL9khZGOieOcXDqQqKRX +Ej1HsVrP5T2gtA/e30M1Ooi6YcfwEr5uHbjw4cXbZBVTEY1rmphbd6EhmZYsED0/Hgf rq+iYkndCPs9Xi6naW2dVjo1Nr9cX76yO1sGtSZLZhe/CNY0Zq7NdFVfbMnkXM5iI90A Anu6NXptqaBoMrZt/ehl9V3uvlnqLsTpWNCMELHGqMnWSxAjTaLLVe1lBHVEsSJ7IYOX aF4L2F4cVi7i1bH125gpQYUwFNmCZzyhA58V8OISbehUIrhPc2yxQMYEBAnnwCR/XqHu B3Bg== X-Received: by 10.194.23.33 with SMTP id j1mr118384070wjf.4.1452247244680; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 02:00:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.190.195 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 02:00:05 -0800 (PST) From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 13:00:05 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: pkg-static: Plist error, directory listed as a file To: User Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 10:00:47 -0000 Happy New Year! Anyone has a clue as to how I can overcome this error? root@gw:/usr/ports/devel/py-pyasn1 # make install ===> Installing for py27-pyasn1-0.1.9 ===> py27-pyasn1-0.1.9 depends on package: py27-setuptools27>0 - found ===> py27-pyasn1-0.1.9 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.7 - found ===> Registering installation for py27-pyasn1-0.1.9 pkg-static: Plist error, directory listed as a file: lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyasn1-0.1.9-py2.7.egg-info *** Error code 74 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/py-pyasn1. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 "Oh, the cruft." From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jan 8 17:10:20 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952A6A67143 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 17:10:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andre@drenet.net) Received: from nqhost.drenet.net (nqhost.drenet.net [184.95.47.164]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 843E71516 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 17:10:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andre@drenet.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nqhost.drenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B90C83AE55 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 12:00:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from nqhost.drenet.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nqhost.drenet.net [127.0.0.1]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 93698-05 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 12:00:11 -0500 (EST) Received: by nqhost.drenet.net (Postfix, from userid 80) id 7851F3AE30; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 12:00:11 -0500 (EST) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Cannot upgrade Perl5 X-PHP-Originating-Script: 501:rcube.php MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 12:00:10 -0500 From: Andre Goree Message-ID: <6753f041ff5192d0b4bb96bd5bf44ace@drenet.net> X-Sender: andre@drenet.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 17:10:20 -0000 I read the UPDATING message regarding perl serveral months ago, but since I used the default version of perl, I disregarded it -- UPDATING mentions only needing to take action if you were NOT using the default version. Here is the issue I'm running into today: agoree@anet ~ % portupgrade perl5 Password: [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 403 packages found - done] ** Port deleted on 2015-12-31: lang/perl5.16 Has expired: Unsupported, please upgrade to a more recent version of Perl ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) - lang/perl5.16 (port deleted) agoree@anet ~ % pkg info -x perl ... perl5-5.16.3_24 ... How exactly would I go about upgrading perl5 given the above error? Perhaps forcing an uninstall and reinstalling it? I suppose I'd then have to rebuild everything that depends on Perl5? -- Andre Goree -=-=-=-=-=- Email - andre at drenet.net Website - http://www.drenet.net PGP key - http://www.drenet.net/pubkey.txt -=-=-=-=-=- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jan 8 18:54:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 349F8A67E13 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 18:54:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sergeig.public@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x22b.google.com (mail-vk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAF9E152F for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 18:54:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sergeig.public@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id k1so196530705vkb.2 for ; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 10:54:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=FmpK9wTqje9hDehHoVntleLeUqqwNZQfhL/VAEU09r8=; b=Hjc0LZ4PeY2CNdNUkLJYDMObQMzmosOt/JfpRa08n6QRZlVEgm96U5sHORkU8BDjop IVcfewAQpKdOQJSOsC+dImKV0tjqcujYKNRdkh8GDdrbl/iP6jfHFIa2zLpp6uzF9trs XbH61YWOavye9F3RXjStUICdfYCgpjjQQJJOlG/vM5iaY8GJ++1s787uw/fag9eaZgd1 n7G+RduiAcfbEr38QujrTNl8Z9ugJ084zEQ5rD/rfmkXMCmSrjdBbDpBXy8sWw5/CW4l 0r/E5zGTVHRF2pYGTg1vmtC0dNrlz/eheHaGYeM+gNPG2jg7/92xe9rF97YfhVL+Dl2y eGfw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.170.9 with SMTP id t9mr78454164vke.66.1452279259830; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 10:54:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.31.174.132 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 10:54:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 10:54:19 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: calcru: runtime went backwards From: Sergei G To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 18:54:21 -0000 I have a FreeBSD 10.2 running as a guest on Hyper-V. When I shutdown guest I get a list of messages in form: calcru: runtime went backwards from 478058 usec to 241721 usec for pid 239 (dhclient) The list includes various usec numbers and at least the following process names: sshd, syslogd, pflogd, devd, dhclient, pagezero, vmdaemon, sctp_iterator, fdc0, cam, geom, init, kernel How do I fix this (clock synchronization?) problem? I downloaded FreeBSD Hyper-V image and run VM in a diff mode. If I remember correctly I did not install anything special on the guest to support Hyper-V. I assumed that if Hyper-V image is provided it must have what's necessary. Thank you From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jan 8 19:38:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF5FA68E0F for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 19:38:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul.j.smith0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x22f.google.com (mail-vk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 241521359 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 19:38:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul.j.smith0@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id a123so166289706vkh.1 for ; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 11:38:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=uUzq+XO9KQBwbshSJlR0WmUtaEr7uofH4Oux9KLwxuE=; b=SFm9NCCDJtSndrs6eINPThFkVln8+CDXCOG0EBAz4GWAGiKSUbKWyZUS6hitVujpcb Kf70eDQ1TDT4n1bcpJsVO8tQjcUKUIHPnNpMqxQJjchG01KTth048DlrOefF6aedIMLT dMZ3O79hHrXF487IagCDlgqnCUsdbYO6qcWNSFMsUkaR9YCge+lDIKytN5wNDv1DtMNZ qOtJRcc90bU0eM+PfbEfMtezs/gNGVF9CUiRUYkGxrKOv8eY+1bsOGgyQRzizw6K9Eca XrhE5wGIpFniybKmO5ZfyL0znWCEfsdEUa+etEMKx+leJxA0PxmNqphb26UR9oHjq8aC XjIw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.174.23 with SMTP id x23mr24959495vke.136.1452281915896; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 11:38:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.31.107.214 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 11:38:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <6753f041ff5192d0b4bb96bd5bf44ace@drenet.net> References: <6753f041ff5192d0b4bb96bd5bf44ace@drenet.net> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 12:38:35 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Cannot upgrade Perl5 From: Paul Smith To: Andre Goree Cc: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 19:38:37 -0000 On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Andre Goree wrote: > I read the UPDATING message regarding perl serveral months ago, but since I > used the default version of perl, I disregarded it -- UPDATING mentions only > needing to take action if you were NOT using the default version. > > Here is the issue I'm running into today: > > agoree@anet ~ % portupgrade perl5 > Password: > [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 403 packages found - done] > ** Port deleted on 2015-12-31: lang/perl5.16 > Has expired: Unsupported, please upgrade to a more recent version of > Perl > ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) > - lang/perl5.16 (port deleted) > agoree@anet ~ % pkg info -x perl > ... > perl5-5.16.3_24 > ... > > > How exactly would I go about upgrading perl5 given the above error? Perhaps > forcing an uninstall and reinstalling it? I suppose I'd then have to > rebuild everything that depends on Perl5? > There is an UPDATING message dated 20150513 stating that the default Perl version was switched to 5.20. That message has instructions on how to upgrade that may help you. Paul From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jan 8 20:11:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AB68A66B27 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 20:11:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E358119FA for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 20:11:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from yuri.doctorlan.com (c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id u08KBhn1003794 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 12:11:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128] claimed to be yuri.doctorlan.com To: FreeBSD Questions From: Yuri Subject: "fsck -y /" keeps saying "Disk is still dirty" no matter how many times I run it Message-ID: <569017FF.9060509@rawbw.com> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 12:11:43 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 20:11:50 -0000 As a result of the power outage I needed to run fsck on UFS disk with soft-updates. But every time the command 'fsck -y /' says that it corrected a lot of problems, but it still leaves the disk dirty. I ran it at least 15 times - same result. What would be the way to proceed from here? (I ran fsck before, but it never happened that fsck keeps finding problems) Thank you, Yuri From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jan 8 20:17:32 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB204A66F77 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 20:17:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 944EA1ED8 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 20:17:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-21-51.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.21.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BCFB3CF06; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 21:17:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id u08KHMer002127; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 21:17:22 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 21:17:22 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Yuri Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: "fsck -y /" keeps saying "Disk is still dirty" no matter how many times I run it Message-Id: <20160108211722.71ab0408.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <569017FF.9060509@rawbw.com> References: <569017FF.9060509@rawbw.com> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 20:17:32 -0000 On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 12:11:43 -0800, Yuri wrote: > As a result of the power outage I needed to run fsck on UFS disk with > soft-updates. > > But every time the command 'fsck -y /' says that it corrected a lot of > problems, but it still leaves the disk dirty. I ran it at least 15 times > - same result. This seems to indicate a massive file system defect. Using "fsck -fy /" enables fsck to use its full spectrum of repair (in comparison to -p "preen mode"). Check if _the same_ problems re-appear. In this case, they could not be fixed properly and the file system won't get the "clean" indicator. > What would be the way to proceed from here? Re-initalize the file system and restore from a recent backup. If you don't have one, you could try to backup from the damaged file system with "dump", then run "newfs", and then "restore". > (I ran fsck before, but it never happened that fsck keeps finding problems) I've seen a comparable problem very few times, but usually a second run of a forced full fsck solved the problem. Are you sure the disk (!) doesn't have problems after the power outage? It's possible that you're seeing a "hardware issue" here. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jan 8 21:44:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B081FA6710D for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 21:44:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E2BD1CAC for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 21:44:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from yuri.doctorlan.com (c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id u08LiO4P017021 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 8 Jan 2016 13:44:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-50-184-63-128.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.184.63.128] claimed to be yuri.doctorlan.com Subject: Re: "fsck -y /" keeps saying "Disk is still dirty" no matter how many times I run it To: Polytropon References: <569017FF.9060509@rawbw.com> <20160108211722.71ab0408.freebsd@edvax.de> Cc: FreeBSD Questions From: Yuri Message-ID: <56902DB8.9080907@rawbw.com> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 13:44:24 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160108211722.71ab0408.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 21:44:30 -0000 On 01/08/2016 12:17, Polytropon wrote: > This seems to indicate a massive file system defect. Using > "fsck -fy /" enables fsck to use its full spectrum of repair > (in comparison to -p "preen mode"). Check if_the same_ problems > re-appear. In this case, they could not be fixed properly > and the file system won't get the "clean" indicator. I had to run 'fsck -fy' ~10 more times until the problem is gone. First time that I saw such an extensive damage. Thank you, Yuri From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jan 8 22:15:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93359A67E5D for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 22:15:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leventelist@gmail.com) Received: from papyrus.altaweb.hu (papyrus.altaweb.hu [195.228.155.151]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5470F1145 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 22:15:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leventelist@gmail.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by papyrus.altaweb.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388A9B47AD for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 22:57:21 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at papyrus.altaweb.hu Received: from papyrus.altaweb.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (papyrus.altaweb.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L4D4SF46Muw3 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 22:57:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from chacha.levafreebsd.org (5E1BB79D.mobile.pool.telekom.hu [94.27.183.157]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: levente@altanet.hu) by papyrus.altaweb.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5AA24B7F11 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 22:57:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from jive (jive.levalinux.org [192.168.1.1]) by chacha.levafreebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C708DE9E9E0 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 23:06:10 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 23:06:03 +0100 From: Lev To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: update Message-ID: <20160108230603.21237c30@jive> In-Reply-To: <20160108050502.4512cc3a74ae262898d72ce9@sohara.org> References: <20160107223738.1b874bba@jive.levalinux.org> <20160107221429.GA15860@archlinux> <20160107232050.140acee9@jive.levalinux.org> <20160108050502.4512cc3a74ae262898d72ce9@sohara.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 22:15:08 -0000 T24gRnJpLCA4IEphbiAyMDE2IDA1OjA1OjAyICswMDAwDQpTdGV2ZSBPJ0hhcmEtU21pdGggPHN0 ZXZlQHNvaGFyYS5vcmc+IHdyb3RlOg0KDQo+IAlMb29rcyBsaWtlIHlvdSBuZWVkIHRvIHJlYm9v dCwgb3IgcmVidWlsZCB5b3VyIGN1c3RvbSBrZXJuZWwNCj4gaWYgeW91IGhhdmUgb25lLiBNeSBy ZWNlbnRseSB1cGRhdGVkIDEwLjIgYm94IHNheXMgdGhpczoNCg0KVGhhbmtzLiBZZXMsIEkgaGF2 ZSBjdXN0b20ga2VybmVsLg0KDQpMZXYNCg0KLS0gDQo3MyBkZSBIQTVPR0wNCk9wLjogTGV2ZW50 ZQ0K From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jan 8 22:22:16 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C850A680F6 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 22:22:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sergeig.public@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x230.google.com (mail-vk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C21814BC for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 22:22:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sergeig.public@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x230.google.com with SMTP id n1so44953302vkb.3 for ; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 14:22:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=xoYnVAYSKqpZqxiHOPEz/GXCmb2nk3322AZkCHyVDp4=; b=bEYgOQign4W0q2Zu14Y3tf2zdi0/OSZhHyCM0GkWOkY6Z0/uflRzU4czL4ttuisZ6k xl5qXtAuCJ76QrHLlbBc9NNWiQ4hcmBkAjJT+D8c9abLATDmJ0BPK07/xbtb1H6zHT2O wmFbjDlawZ/u7aW4nIKZwgmiY4xKKxnv4RLV1Tp9dZvF1EhgJm+i4/iD6D+twNgmlAP3 V10kbTVHu4oWcCrtSG1HdWQZdJufewv38ThLw4DzLhUCQmyUyOagrj6ASkk023eGmsLV Q3/2uYlb5XqvpOc9U4BCI+yUq4MwtsflHFCaWuL1b8Qg7dwrTUqnl4vUeUNcwMkIzO1l iGMg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.16.140 with SMTP id 12mr74693776vkq.106.1452291735100; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 14:22:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.31.174.132 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 14:22:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 14:22:15 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Sublime 3 on 10.2 From: Sergei G To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 22:22:16 -0000 I installed sublime3 through package. Trying to start sublime editor with command truss sublime end get an error: linux_access /etc/ld.so.preload, 4 No Such file or directory Full log: linux_brk(0x0,0x28136fc4,0x0,0x8048034,0x8,0x6) = 135405568 (0x8122000) linux_newuname(0xffffc2c2,0x31c,0x28136fc4,0x281378f8,0x39,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x1000,0x3,0x22,0xffffffff,0x6) = 672366592 (0x28138000) *linux_access("/etc/ld.so.preload",4) ERR#2 'No such file or director y'* linux_open("/etc/ld.so.cache",0x0,00) = 3 (0x3) linux_fstat64(0x3,0xffffbfa4,0x28136fc4,0x28137880,0x3,0x6) = 0 (0x0) close(3) = 0 (0x0) linux_open("/lib/tls/i686/sse2/libtinfo.so.5",0x0,00) ERR#2 'No such file or dir ectory' linux_stat64("/lib/tls/i686/sse2",0xffffbff4,0xffffbff4) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' linux_open("/lib/tls/i686/libtinfo.so.5",0x0,00) ERR#2 'No such file or director y' linux_stat64("/lib/tls/i686",0xffffbff4,0xffffbff4) ERR#2 'No such file or direc tory' linux_open("/lib/tls/sse2/libtinfo.so.5",0x0,00) ERR#2 'No such file or director y' linux_stat64("/lib/tls/sse2",0xffffbff4,0xffffbff4) ERR#2 'No such file or direc tory' linux_open("/lib/tls/libtinfo.so.5",0x0,00) ERR#2 'No such file or director y' linux_stat64("/lib/tls",0xffffbff4,0xffffbff4) = 0 (0x0) linux_open("/lib/i686/sse2/libtinfo.so.5",0x0,00) ERR#2 'No such file or directo ry' linux_stat64("/lib/i686/sse2",0xffffbff4,0xffffbff4) ERR#2 'No such file or dire ctory' linux_open("/lib/i686/libtinfo.so.5",0x0,00) ERR#2 'No such file or director y' linux_stat64("/lib/i686",0xffffbff4,0xffffbff4) = 0 (0x0) linux_open("/lib/sse2/libtinfo.so.5",0x0,00) ERR#2 'No such file or director y' linux_stat64("/lib/sse2",0xffffbff4,0xffffbff4) ERR#2 'No such file or director y' linux_open("/lib/libtinfo.so.5",0x0,00) = 3 (0x3) read(3,"\^?ELF\^A\^A\^A\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,512) = 512 (0x200) linux_fstat64(0x3,0xffffbfe4,0x28136fc4,0x0,0x8053b9d,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x18c98,0x5,0x802,0x3,0x6) = 672370688 (0x28139000) linux_mmap2(0x2814f000,0x3000,0x3,0x812,0x3,0x6) = 672460800 (0x2814f000) close(3) = 0 (0x0) linux_open("/lib/tls/libdl.so.2",0x0,03) ERR#2 'No such file or director y' linux_open("/lib/i686/libdl.so.2",0x0,03) ERR#2 'No such file or director y' linux_open("/lib/libdl.so.2",0x0,03) = 3 (0x3) read(3,"\^?ELF\^A\^A\^A\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,512) = 512 (0x200) linux_fstat64(0x3,0xffffbfc8,0x28136fc4,0x0,0x8053c04,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x4074,0x5,0x802,0x3,0x6) = 672473088 (0x28152000) linux_mmap2(0x28155000,0x2000,0x3,0x812,0x3,0x6) = 672485376 (0x28155000) close(3) = 0 (0x0) linux_open("/lib/tls/libc.so.6",0x0,05004701270) ERR#2 'No such file or director y' linux_open("/lib/i686/libc.so.6",0x0,05004701270) ERR#2 'No such file or directo ry' linux_open("/lib/libc.so.6",0x0,05004701270) = 3 (0x3) read(3,"\^?ELF\^A\^A\^A\^C\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,512) = 512 (0x200) linux_fstat64(0x3,0xffffbfac,0x28136fc4,0x0,0x8053c2c,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x1969ac,0x5,0x802,0x3,0x6) = 672493568 (0x28157000) linux_mprotect(0x282e7000,0x1000,0x0,0x1000,0x28138560,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mmap2(0x282e8000,0x3000,0x3,0x812,0x3,0x6) = 674136064 (0x282e8000) linux_mmap2(0x282eb000,0x29ac,0x3,0x32,0xffffffff,0x6) = 674148352 (0x282eb000) close(3) = 0 (0x0) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x1000,0x3,0x22,0xffffffff,0x6) = 674160640 (0x282ee000) linux_set_thread_area(0xffffc478,0x28136fc4,0x282ee6c0,0x0,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mprotect(0x282e8000,0x2000,0x1,0x28138560,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mprotect(0x28155000,0x1000,0x1,0x281382c8,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mprotect(0x28136000,0x1000,0x1,0x2813751c,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0x0,0x81212dc,0x8,0x282e9ff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_open("/dev/tty",0x8802,00) = 3 (0x3) close(3) = 0 (0x0) linux_brk(0x0,0x282e9ff4,0x0,0x0,0x21000,0x6) = 135405568 (0x8122000) linux_brk(0x8143000,0x282e9ff4,0x8143000,0x8122000,0x8143000,0x6) = 135540736 (0 x8143000) linux_open("/usr/lib/locale/locale-archive",0x8000,01) = 3 (0x3) linux_fstat64(0x3,0x282eab00,0x282e9ff4,0xffffc210,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x200000,0x1,0x2,0x3,0x6) = 674164736 (0x282ef000) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x11f000,0x1,0x2,0x3,0x6) = 676261888 (0x284ef000) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x1000,0x1,0x2,0x3,0x6) = 677437440 (0x2860e000) close(3) = 0 (0x0) linux_getuid(0x282e9ff4,0x0,0x282ad546,0x0,0x0,0x6) = 1001 (0x3e9) linux_getgid(0x3e9,0x0,0x282ad546,0x0,0x0,0x6) = 1001 (0x3e9) geteuid() = 1001 (0x3e9) getegid() = 1001 (0x3e9) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0x0,0x8120b1c,0x8,0x282e9ff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_time(0x0,0xffffc7c0,0x0,0x0,0x0,0x6) = 1452291593 (0x56903609) linux_open("/proc/meminfo",0x80000,0666) ERR#2 'No such file or director y' linux_rt_sigaction(0x11,0xffffc220,0xffffc194,0x8,0x282e9ff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigaction(0x11,0xffffc220,0xffffc194,0x8,0x282e9ff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigaction(0x2,0xffffc220,0xffffc194,0x8,0x282e9ff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigaction(0x2,0xffffc220,0xffffc194,0x8,0x282e9ff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigaction(0x3,0xffffc220,0xffffc194,0x8,0x282e9ff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigaction(0x3,0xffffc220,0xffffc194,0x8,0x282e9ff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0x0,0x8121240,0x8,0x282e9ff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigaction(0x3,0xffffc220,0xffffc194,0x8,0x282e9ff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_newuname(0xffffc296,0x0,0x282e9ff4,0xff,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_stat64("/home/sergei",0xffffc320,0xffffc320) = 0 (0x0) linux_stat64(".",0xffffc2c0,0xffffc2c0) = 0 (0x0) linux_getpid(0x8124fd8,0x0,0x0,0x0,0x0,0x6) = 1367 (0x557) linux_open("/usr/lib/gconv/gconv-modules.cache",0x0,00) = 3 (0x3) linux_fstat64(0x3,0xffffc18c,0x282e9ff4,0x3,0x282ad25f,0x6) = 0 (0x0) close(3) = 0 (0x0) linux_open("/usr/lib/gconv/gconv-modules",0x0,0666) = 3 (0x3) linux_fstat64(0x3,0xffffc0c0,0x282e9ff4,0x8125248,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x8000,0x3,0x22,0xffffffff,0x6) = 677441536 (0x2860f000) read(3,"# GNU libc iconv configuration."...,32768) = 32768 (0x8000) read(3,"JAPANESE//\tEUC-JP//\nalias\tOSF"...,32768) = 23335 (0x5b27) read(3,0x2860f000,32768) = 0 (0x0) close(3) = 0 (0x0) munmap(0x2860f000,32768) = 0 (0x0) linux_getppid(0x8124fd8,0x0,0x1,0x0,0x0,0x6) = 1366 (0x556) linux_socketcall(1,(0xffffc080)LINUX_SOCKET, 0x0) = 3 (0x3) linux_socketcall(3,(0xffffc05c)LINUX_CONNECT, 0x6e) ERR#2 'No such file or direc tory' close(3) = 0 (0x0) linux_socketcall(1,(0xffffc190)LINUX_SOCKET, 0x0) = 3 (0x3) linux_socketcall(3,(0xffffc16c)LINUX_CONNECT, 0x6e) ERR#2 'No such file or direc tory' close(3) = 0 (0x0) linux_open("/etc/nsswitch.conf",0x0,0666) = 3 (0x3) linux_fstat64(0x3,0xffffc16c,0x282e9ff4,0x813e968,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x8000,0x3,0x22,0xffffffff,0x6) = 677441536 (0x2860f000) read(3,"#\n# /etc/nsswitch.conf\n#\n# An"...,32768) = 1688 (0x698) read(3,0x2860f000,32768) = 0 (0x0) close(3) = 0 (0x0) munmap(0x2860f000,32768) = 0 (0x0) linux_open("/lib/tls/libnss_files.so.2",0x0,0107) ERR#2 'No such file or directo ry' linux_open("/lib/i686/libnss_files.so.2",0x0,0107) ERR#2 'No such file or direct ory' linux_open("/lib/libnss_files.so.2",0x0,0107) = 3 (0x3) read(3,"\^?ELF\^A\^A\^A\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,512) = 512 (0x200) linux_fstat64(0x3,0xffffbc78,0x28136fc4,0x0,0xffffc280,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mmap2(0x0,0xd2cc,0x5,0x802,0x3,0x6) = 677441536 (0x2860f000) linux_mmap2(0x2861b000,0x2000,0x3,0x812,0x3,0x6) = 677490688 (0x2861b000) close(3) = 0 (0x0) linux_mprotect(0x2861b000,0x1000,0x1,0x813f028,0x2,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_open("/etc/passwd",0x80000,0666) = 3 (0x3) linux_fcntl64(0x3,0x1,0x0,0x0,0x282e9ff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_fcntl64(0x3,0x2,0x1,0x0,0x282e9ff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_fstat64(0x3,0xffffc180,0x282e9ff4,0x813f2a8,0x3ff,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_mmap2(0x0,0x8000,0x3,0x22,0xffffffff,0x6) = 677498880 (0x2861d000) read(3,"# $FreeBSD: releng/10.2/etc/mast"...,32768) = 2317 (0x90d) close(3) = 0 (0x0) munmap(0x2861d000,32768) = 0 (0x0) linux_gettimeofday(0xffffc398,0x0,0x0,0xffffc400,0x813f310,0x6) = 0 (0x0) getpgrp() = 1366 (0x556) linux_rt_sigaction(0x11,0xffffc220,0xffffc194,0x8,0x282e9ff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_getrlimit(0x6,0xffffc38c,0x282e9ff4,0x1,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_access("/etc/sysconfig/32bit_ssse3_memcpy_via_32bit_ssse3_memmove",0) ERR# 2 'No such file or directory' linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0x0,0x81212dc,0x8,0x282e9ff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_open("/usr/local/bin/sublime",0x8000,00) = 3 (0x3) linux_ioctl(0x3,0x5401,0xffffc3d8,0xffffc418,0x282e9ff4,0x6) ERR#25 'Inappropria te ioctl for device' linux_llseek(0x3,0x0,0x0,0xffffc440,0x1,0x6) = 0 (0x0) read(3,"#!/compat/linux/bin/sh\nif [ -L "...,80) = 80 (0x50) linux_llseek(0x3,0x0,0x0,0xffffc440,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_getrlimit(0x7,0xffffc40c,0x282e9ff4,0x8140330,0x3,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_fcntl64(0xff,0x1,0xffffc43c,0xffffc43c,0x282e9ff4,0x6) ERR#9 'Bad file des criptor' dup2(0x3,0xff,0xff,0xffffc43c,0x3,0x6) = 255 (0xff) close(3) = 0 (0x0) linux_fcntl64(0xff,0x2,0x1,0x8140330,0x282e9ff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_fcntl64(0xff,0x3,0x0,0x0,0x282e9ff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_fstat64(0xff,0xffffc4b0,0x282e9ff4,0x0,0x0,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_llseek(0xff,0x0,0x0,0xffffc470,0x1,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0x0,0x81212dc,0x8,0x282e9ff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) read(255,"#!/compat/linux/bin/sh\nif [ -L "...,432) = 432 (0x1b0) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0x0,0x81212dc,0x8,0x282e9ff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0x0,0x811f23c,0x8,0x282e9ff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_lstat64(0x8141df0,0xffffc1a8,0x282e9ff4,0x1,0x8141d01,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x2,0x811f23c,0x0,0x8,0x282e9ff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0xffffc258,0xffffc1d8,0x8,0x282e9ff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_llseek(0xff,0xffffffff,0xffffffff,0xffffc170,0x1,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_clone(0x1200011,0x0,0x0,0x0,0x282ee728,0x6) = 1368 (0x558) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x2,0xffffc1d8,0x0,0x8,0x282e9ff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0xffffc2e0,0xffffc260,0x8,0x282e9ff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x2,0xffffc260,0x0,0x8,0x282e9ff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0xffffc2e0,0xffffc260,0x8,0x282e9ff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigaction(0x2,0xffffc050,0xffffbfc4,0x8,0x282e9ff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_waitpid(0xffffffff,0xffffc21c,0x0,0x0,0x0,0x6) = 1368 (0x558) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x2,0xffffc260,0x0,0x8,0x282e9ff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigaction(0x2,0xffffc030,0xffffbfa4,0x8,0x282e9ff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0x0,0x81212dc,0x8,0x282e9ff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) read(255,"\n",432) = 1 (0x1) linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x0,0x0,0x81212dc,0x8,0x282e9ff4,0x6) = 0 (0x0) read(255,0x8140d20,432) = 0 (0x0) process exit, rval = 0 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jan 8 23:12:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EFA8A68FAB for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 23:12:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sliderule.demon.co.uk) Received: from smtp.demon.co.uk (mdfmta005.mxout.tch.inty.net [91.221.169.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6AA71BC6 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 23:12:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sliderule.demon.co.uk) Received: from smtp.demon.co.uk (unknown [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mdfmta005.tch.inty.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 101DE18D2DB for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 23:06:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mdfmta004.tch.inty.net (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mdfmta004.tch.inty.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A288AC409B for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 23:05:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mdfmta004.tch.inty.net (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mdfmta004.tch.inty.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B4DAC406D for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 23:05:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.254.7] (unknown [80.177.21.188]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mdfmta004.tch.inty.net (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 23:05:55 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: pkg-static: Plist error, directory listed as a file To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: Steve Burton Message-ID: <569040D5.4030105@sliderule.demon.co.uk> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 23:05:57 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-MDF-HostID: 17 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 23:12:24 -0000 On 08/01/2016 10:00, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > Happy New Year! > > Anyone has a clue as to how I can overcome this error? > > root@gw:/usr/ports/devel/py-pyasn1 # make install > ===> Installing for py27-pyasn1-0.1.9 > ===> py27-pyasn1-0.1.9 depends on package: py27-setuptools27>0 - found > ===> py27-pyasn1-0.1.9 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.7 - found > ===> Registering installation for py27-pyasn1-0.1.9 > pkg-static: Plist error, directory listed as a file: > lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyasn1-0.1.9-py2.7.egg-info > *** Error code 74 > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/py-pyasn1. > > There's a note in UPDATING for this. Steve. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jan 9 00:05:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31FB9A68383 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 00:05:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noc@hdk5.net) Received: from relay10.netenterprise.net (relay10.netenterprise.net [66.180.133.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8226144C for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 00:05:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noc@hdk5.net) X-Envelope-From: noc@hdk5.net X-Envelope-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: From imail5.netenterprise.net (64.29.90.135) by relay10.netenterprise.net (MAILFOUNDRY) id mg3FWLZlEeW4agAl; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 00:11:59 -0000 (GMT) Received: from ponolei.intra.net [72.235.61.32] by IMAIL5.netenterprise.net with ESMTP (SMTPD-12.5.3.93) id a09900034f8ca13f; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 14:05:13 -1000 Message-ID: <56904EBA.2010108@hdk5.net> Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 14:05:14 -1000 From: al plant User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071128 FreeBSD/i386 SeaMonkey/1.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon CC: Yuri , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: "fsck -y /" keeps saying "Disk is still dirty" no matter how many times I run it References: <569017FF.9060509@rawbw.com> <20160108211722.71ab0408.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20160108211722.71ab0408.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 00:05:21 -0000 Polytropon wrote: > On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 12:11:43 -0800, Yuri wrote: > >> As a result of the power outage I needed to run fsck on UFS disk with >> soft-updates. >> >> But every time the command 'fsck -y /' says that it corrected a lot of >> problems, but it still leaves the disk dirty. I ran it at least 15 times >> - same result. >> > > This seems to indicate a massive file system defect. Using > "fsck -fy /" enables fsck to use its full spectrum of repair > (in comparison to -p "preen mode"). Check if _the same_ problems > re-appear. In this case, they could not be fixed properly > and the file system won't get the "clean" indicator. > > > > >> What would be the way to proceed from here? >> > > Re-initalize the file system and restore from a recent backup. > If you don't have one, you could try to backup from the damaged > file system with "dump", then run "newfs", and then "restore". > > > > >> (I ran fsck before, but it never happened that fsck keeps finding problems) >> > > I've seen a comparable problem very few times, but usually > a second run of a forced full fsck solved the problem. > > Are you sure the disk (!) doesn't have problems after the > power outage? It's possible that you're seeing a "hardware > issue" here. > > > > > Aloha Yuri, I think Poly may be right about hardware fault. If the power surged and then went off I lost a drive this way a long time ago. Al ~ Al Plant - Honolulu, Hawaii - Phone: 808-284-2740 ~ Supporting FreeBSD - UNIX Computer O/S email: noc@hdk5.net email: alplant.att.net ."All that's really worth doing is what we do for others" - Lewis Carrol From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jan 9 00:17:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C819A68771 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 00:17:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@noos.larseighner.com) Received: from emailserver2.asdf456.com (emailserver2.asdf456.com [72.18.207.139]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 614581957 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 00:17:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@noos.larseighner.com) Received: (qmail 29898 invoked by uid 0); 9 Jan 2016 00:17:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO noos.larseighner.com) (70.115.135.184) by emailserver2.asdf456.com with SMTP; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 16:17:32 -0800 Received: by noos.larseighner.com (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1001 lars@noos.larseighner.com; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 18:15:21 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 18:15:20 -0600 (CST) From: Lars Eighner X-X-Sender: lars@noos.larseighnerhome.com To: Yuri cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: "fsck -y /" keeps saying "Disk is still dirty" no matter how many times I run it In-Reply-To: <569017FF.9060509@rawbw.com> Message-ID: References: <569017FF.9060509@rawbw.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 00:17:40 -0000 On Fri, 8 Jan 2016, Yuri wrote: > As a result of the power outage I needed to run fsck on UFS disk with > soft-updates. > > But every time the command 'fsck -y /' says that it corrected a lot of > problems, but it still leaves the disk dirty. I ran it at least 15 times - > same result. Most likely you have a bad sector on your disk. fsck cannot fix this. When you write to the disk, hopefully the disk will mark the sector bad, and basically hide it. Unfortunately, you cannot mount it to write if it is dirty. You can only newfs it, which means goodbye to everything since your last backup. After you newfs, you can restore from your backup. > > What would be the way to proceed from here? > > (I ran fsck before, but it never happened that fsck keeps finding problems) > > Thank you, > Yuri > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- Lars Eighner http://www.larseighner.com/index.html 8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jan 9 00:34:55 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3035A68D21 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 00:34:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 756CD1359 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 00:34:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-21-51.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.21.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CC4E277DD; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 01:29:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id u090T9Qf004377; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 01:29:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 01:29:09 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Lars Eighner Cc: Yuri , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: "fsck -y /" keeps saying "Disk is still dirty" no matter how many times I run it Message-Id: <20160109012909.6e9b257e.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <569017FF.9060509@rawbw.com> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 00:34:55 -0000 On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 18:15:20 -0600 (CST), Lars Eighner wrote: > On Fri, 8 Jan 2016, Yuri wrote: > > > As a result of the power outage I needed to run fsck on UFS disk with > > soft-updates. > > > > But every time the command 'fsck -y /' says that it corrected a lot of > > problems, but it still leaves the disk dirty. I ran it at least 15 times - > > same result. > > Most likely you have a bad sector on your disk. fsck cannot fix this. When > you write to the disk, hopefully the disk will mark the sector bad, and > basically hide it. The disk should do this automatically. As soon as you can see errors "bubbling up", the disk is out of spare sectors and cannot remap anymore. In this case, it's usually a good move to decommission the disk and replace it with a new one. However, if this is _not_ the case and fsck can repair the disk, it can be kept in use. I would still suggest to run periodic checks with "smartctl" and _always_ have a recent backup ready to go. > Unfortunately, you cannot mount it to write if it is > dirty. It's probably still possible to mount it read-only and recover the majority of files (depending on how much impact the defects have). > You can only newfs it, which means goodbye to everything since your > last backup. After you newfs, you can restore from your backup. Also have a look at "man badsect" if this is still relevant. If the disk is "not that broken", maybe it can still serve for a while (with the defective and unmappable sectors marked properly). I know disks that have been "formatted smaller", from 80 MB to 40 MB that continued working for decades... :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jan 9 00:44:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EABB4A685CA for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 00:44:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd1008@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x22e.google.com (mail-oi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B716D1235 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 00:44:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd1008@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id o124so13012396oia.3 for ; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 16:44:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=d9hvr81pfgZs/lzrnE+y+bpSak+jeIfakVvI1jjhcrE=; b=CvvX+foP+uanIhb+G6HiTF/d2MjJ3U/Lb9oKidN0Hcoqkdu6Ru0cltXy6U9vWZ0oQx z9mMSle3RI5inGnf8YPRA+lfa8Sy+aEIdE4VjcjDxIr9Qxs2FxQoOPYIRaE66HG5KqSk RO6S81DoigFa570e2LFwjJok8l1h42kzfppgM+jia+1pCbtRIXw9tLAuqk+Efj99OmZR i8tev7GkWQUsrrZnXy0XDQbxxuUsaMkf5adojKhQpoa7qnLmSf4G/hdaO8NxmslJPo0o 0pVRQqcfZlr1mN3GI1+yZ4qMXUlezvuewZtNE0fhSKVAHl7ircGmJY55ZV9romz4U+61 CySQ== X-Received: by 10.202.79.137 with SMTP id d131mr80821767oib.37.1452300289035; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 16:44:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([50.243.6.59]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id l19sm7615557oig.27.2016.01.08.16.44.47 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 08 Jan 2016 16:44:47 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: "fsck -y /" keeps saying "Disk is still dirty" no matter how many times I run it To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <569017FF.9060509@rawbw.com> From: jd1008 Message-ID: <569057F6.6060903@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 17:44:38 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 00:44:50 -0000 On 01/08/2016 05:15 PM, Lars Eighner wrote: > On Fri, 8 Jan 2016, Yuri wrote: > >> As a result of the power outage I needed to run fsck on UFS disk with >> soft-updates. >> >> But every time the command 'fsck -y /' says that it corrected a lot >> of problems, but it still leaves the disk dirty. I ran it at least 15 >> times - same result. > > Most likely you have a bad sector on your disk. fsck cannot fix this. > When you write to the disk, hopefully the disk will mark the sector > bad, and basically hide it. Unfortunately, you cannot mount it to > write if it is dirty. You can only newfs it, which means goodbye to > everything since your last backup. After you newfs, you can restore > from your backup. > > >> >> What would be the way to proceed from here? >> >> (I ran fsck before, but it never happened that fsck keeps finding >> problems) >> >> Thank you, >> Yuri Can you boot from a live fbsd cdrom and run fsck on the boot drive? Add the option -f -v Assuming your boot partition and slice is |ada0s1a |fsck -v -f -y /dev/|ada0s1a 2>&1 | tee /tmp/fsck.out| Please provide the file /tmp/fsck.out by uploading it to some sharing website, and provide the url to it. Be sure the drive in question is not mounted. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jan 9 05:23:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47568A69F53 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 05:23:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eleonora.marchioretti@yahoo.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A04A1FF1 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 05:23:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eleonora.marchioretti@yahoo.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 07AC9A69F51; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 05:23:21 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075A5A69F50 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 05:23:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eleonora.marchioretti@yahoo.com) Received: from nm42-vm8.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm42-vm8.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [67.195.87.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF4971FEF for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 05:23:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eleonora.marchioretti@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1452316542; bh=kqtsjPqnbu8rJ0uguZ0z12r7Dyfe+AijD6lNLkmP6m0=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:From:Subject; b=DdZELc7vBo4jLDjqVszCroHkrlDwzxCFw+JK99+bB86CUQDDVHm2pdgxKU1vMm6jQsA105QwpAnxS8rD+ODrtQrsDMwt4ndxlZk3g6N+6aE2kJXIuF11kWcHbnXb7fpJoE0QGY9TNZcdfB0FoMJb+sOmZ9mO2XIuYhTQWR6WVfludRW/fvLT4Dow81VDWDcY++0L9CJq8OR1eSsfbWVkNrNBkGKKDj2CUJCoLYzmFIfqUPQw4icsN4qkFvJs8phGW0fKF1m32eXyxYAcLiiKEHG5+2SYVLGwVUfm02wfxOUrjg2DiQhJ6qbbM3/qTkY+6KEQDbFHuR3rV++Juu1TqA== Received: from [127.0.0.1] by nm42.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jan 2016 05:15:42 -0000 Received: from [216.39.60.180] by nm42.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jan 2016 05:12:55 -0000 Received: from [212.82.98.125] by tm16.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jan 2016 05:12:55 -0000 Received: from [212.82.98.95] by tm18.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jan 2016 05:12:54 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1032.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jan 2016 05:12:54 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-4 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 826525.41179.bm@omp1032.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-YMail-OSG: 3t7OfsoVM1k0DXwx8OvY.pjetuwlxCmcIgIyVS7lnk9DrbgNy0OZgw.zCbjxvTw hAHEMp4L.iGRnNp53jzaN5aCsdenuzIyDbJHmFYk1SBOaD7xbC9PadaM9VkEBZBbAOVipc7l8EHv tBWuoZsvIrxYa.OC_2U.i.NW6vRF84HmDgrI0swzYlGUT2MUC_QWHjk3ILWtYAIvIyYV4mBcrbSu _iww22jTNzCJlOmjc.hjrhPBzcGiynaBbAyOgFrvBIl8MXpplrTddgw.mLTJeg2lXYIgKLFqmuFI IDAa8zjNmGrbN4O1ZVSd7aaoijgYSGSnt6xl3jbcB9X0H5kjDJEtu4jMEnmlWhFS20McpODBDmoA DUJxwm5H81xjR5Dz0LveejWwzE92VcuwqowgKPEOlpSt9gGy5V7myGZ9KMLeJ7PiY4kvbm51uEvw b_UZCu9aMFzq6CZNGX3jq0jcOmf6sH1kN0_3V.pZ_BeiYuEztDUtVznmBL2D7xiX2Vm844We_cn9 xbdSLOYORLWk1taPKUEYFZw0xUc0bhl9_wLgE7g-- Received: by 217.12.8.245; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 05:12:54 +0000 Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 05:12:54 +0000 (UTC) From: Eleonora Marchioretti Reply-To: Eleonora Marchioretti To: "doc@FreeBSD.org" , "questions@FreeBSD.org" Message-ID: <33018666.1010913.1452316374119.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Install Unix on a laptop with Windows OS MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <33018666.1010913.1452316374119.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 05:23:21 -0000 Hi I would like to know if it is possible to install UNIX (not Linux) on a laptop that has already a Windows OS and if you have instructions to do it.Thank you in advance. Best regardsEleonora From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jan 9 07:51:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 274BEA68C6A for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 07:51:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markhamb@corp.ssimicro.com) Received: from mail.ssimicro.com (mail.ssimicro.com [64.247.129.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.ssimicro.com", Issuer "RapidSSL SHA256 CA - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6DAE1381 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 07:51:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markhamb@corp.ssimicro.com) Received: from Markhams-MacBook-Pro.local (64-247-136-115.ssimicro.com [64.247.136.115]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.ssimicro.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u097T60g031179 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sat, 9 Jan 2016 00:29:07 -0700 (MST) Subject: Re: "fsck -y /" keeps saying "Disk is still dirty" no matter how many times I run it To: jd1008 , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <569017FF.9060509@rawbw.com> <569057F6.6060903@gmail.com> From: markham breitbach Message-ID: <5690B7BF.1040505@corp.ssimicro.com> Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 00:33:19 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <569057F6.6060903@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 07:51:06 -0000 On 2016-01-08 5:44 PM, jd1008 wrote: > > On 01/08/2016 05:15 PM, Lars Eighner wrote: >> On Fri, 8 Jan 2016, Yuri wrote: >> >>> As a result of the power outage I needed to run fsck on UFS disk >>> with soft-updates. >>> >>> But every time the command 'fsck -y /' says that it corrected a lot >>> of problems, but it still leaves the disk dirty. I ran it at least >>> 15 times - same result. >> >> Most likely you have a bad sector on your disk. fsck cannot fix this. >> When you write to the disk, hopefully the disk will mark the sector >> bad, and basically hide it. Unfortunately, you cannot mount it to >> write if it is dirty. You can only newfs it, which means goodbye to >> everything since your last backup. After you newfs, you can restore >> from your backup. >> >> >>> >>> What would be the way to proceed from here? >>> >>> (I ran fsck before, but it never happened that fsck keeps finding >>> problems) >>> >>> Thank you, >>> Yuri > Can you boot from a live fbsd cdrom and run fsck > on the boot drive? > Add the option -f -v > Assuming your boot partition and slice is |ada0s1a > |fsck -v -f -y /dev/|ada0s1a 2>&1 | tee /tmp/fsck.out| > > Please provide the file /tmp/fsck.out by uploading it to some sharing > website, and provide the url to it. > > Be sure the drive in question is not mounted. > > It is possible that there are problems with the controller. Can you take the drive and put it into a completely different host? (Ideally as a secondary drive so you can boot without having to mount the drive) -M From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jan 9 08:09:18 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 791F5A67A26 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 08:09:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vbotka@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D6ED18C2 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 08:09:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vbotka@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 599FDA67A25; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 08:09:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59463A67A24 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 08:09:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vbotka@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAA2B18C0 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 08:09:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vbotka@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id u188so161193729wmu.1 for ; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 00:09:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-type; bh=jgy+FkFCu6ZBf/BiSVKNRJVTVL5kfCjkOLG2JRANk20=; b=rl9DG3PtcRZM86Cc3sBvyL9MBbcYU1kgPFB4BW9Hz/hQhvtXzXvGge65gvCgijjMPd QCeHi6suGB/ugeeLLoJGJVZT8+BZb6SWgZnAGEza24X2P8oeeMe2bzsURdRBOLzpecjM 2ctQsbbItp/4OITAlw17cCRdF49V7oHeFR0lzCRZiZ9z1Nmh+pUzi4yjxgSk/ijxoRzW FFUWIoYc//lFz15hh7Uq3uyispsSqP6SzklBwwq9o/IEqumn0RFYoNk8lLB0E25FJwCc VCFwT367XDQMuwY/Z/UG9aIQyu5gfPhkmChxLN9og0HDybKrxE9/3QZL38cDixFaS+M9 aYjw== X-Received: by 10.194.117.5 with SMTP id ka5mr108062723wjb.20.1452326955630; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 00:09:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from planb.netng.org (ip-89-176-92-35.net.upcbroadband.cz. [89.176.92.35]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jo6sm109614843wjb.48.2016.01.09.00.09.13 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 09 Jan 2016 00:09:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 09:09:12 +0100 From: Vladimir Botka To: Eleonora Marchioretti Cc: "questions@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: Install Unix on a laptop with Windows OS Message-ID: <20160109090912.55df2678@planb.netng.org> In-Reply-To: <33018666.1010913.1452316374119.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> References: <33018666.1010913.1452316374119.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <33018666.1010913.1452316374119.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Organization: na X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; i686-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/digmU5cJoj02__KrrE1gaUE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 08:09:18 -0000 --Sig_/digmU5cJoj02__KrrE1gaUE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 05:12:54 +0000 (UTC) Eleonora Marchioretti via freebsd-questions wrote: > Hi > I would like to know if it is possible to install UNIX (not Linux) on > a laptop that has already a Windows OS and if you have instructions > to do it.Thank you in advance. > Best regardsEleonora Hi, yes, FreeBSD can be installed alongside Windows. Searching for "site:freebsd.org dual boot" will give you references to the threads in the forums. You probably would like to find the one that fits the versions of your systems. Cheers, -vlado --Sig_/digmU5cJoj02__KrrE1gaUE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWkMAoAAoJEJDRmRKO1E8BPlYIAKd1+eLb5nPy/MFLZMwOc/yl TlbwgvctOrCWJtTKspaLFHKtr8nCJrZ/56mjA2gQ5SuQ9a48o/17B/mqz6aQDFrp ZvWUQy3QolQtzQooIH01UGop9moBX7pd/uv8gEiEudAMm25iEXsYIPzH9t6rd0kd hBtFL1Ni537sYeYT5kp2xymeNSWKO/vmSJ7QffVTO4XWs+YmgqwP38zxoFEymQUb fkfc81cJ4OKxN9MQANtw7yewtR/n7XqmlSi7O5Yjo4EJZvH62kes2/UgQauf/uMn +xMDQ7eLzgVTky7Dwiql15R1xOih7zFJizxWH450Hp7f7aOsVt/f8ZyOSPhYdgc= =LNdo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/digmU5cJoj02__KrrE1gaUE-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jan 9 09:25:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CA3A6965A; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 09:25:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from afiskon@devzen.ru) Received: from relay16.nicmail.ru (relay16.nicmail.ru [195.208.5.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 638F21B9A; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 09:25:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from afiskon@devzen.ru) Received: from [109.70.25.119] (port=44647 helo=nicmail.ru) by f17.mail.nic.ru with esmtp (Exim 5.55) (envelope-from ) id 1aHplW-0008wL-5h; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 12:24:54 +0300 Received: from [10.0.6.221] (account afiskon@devzen.ru HELO fujitsu) by fcgp05.nicmail.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.3) with ESMTPA id 334442258; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 12:24:54 +0300 Received: from [188.123.231.37] (account afiskon@devzen.ru HELO fujitsu) by proxy01.mail.nic.ru (Exim 5.55) with id 1aHplW-00051k-LB; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 12:24:54 +0300 Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 12:22:54 +0300 From: Eax Melanhovich To: Eleonora Marchioretti via freebsd-questions Cc: "doc@FreeBSD.org" , "questions@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: Install Unix on a laptop with Windows OS Message-ID: <20160109122254.32c91434@fujitsu> In-Reply-To: <33018666.1010913.1452316374119.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> References: <33018666.1010913.1452316374119.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <33018666.1010913.1452316374119.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 09:25:03 -0000 Still according to my experience this is a bad idea. Last time I tried something like this Windows was corrupting boot loader from time to time so it was impossible to boot anything except Windows. I would recommend to use one OS you are using most often and run second under VirtualBox. Or using two separate computers one for each OS if possible. This way you will escape a lot of possible problems. On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 05:12:54 +0000 (UTC) Eleonora Marchioretti via freebsd-questions wrote: > Hi > I would like to know if it is possible to install UNIX (not Linux) on > a laptop that has already a Windows OS and if you have instructions > to do it.Thank you in advance. Best regardsEleonora > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To > unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Best regards, Eax Melanhovich http://eax.me/ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jan 9 12:17:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA18CA67859 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 12:17:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6724@bellsouth.net) Received: from nm22-vm2.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm22-vm2.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.63.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B19061014 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 12:17:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6724@bellsouth.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bellsouth.net; s=s2048; t=1452341643; bh=8NHDYLViLv6WT3/H5ZGpffj+GAJ7gjhOxpPbVfvbpVw=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:From:Subject; b=kvNMaEcCxNuPWvT5u7EEVY/E5OBsvJc3Zvd1ns4XhOrCV0Yl0a7fAaQahJfhxUUtGFQRUxYyLXpiUV7QOsqpBVIuamhgu5RVdELGwZ46PT5NtLaYUvdsAYulHK8JfgN9Fcw0Gk55ce2i5d7wski5n4DFJe8SGXVGDdiksevOZ3JJoKq1gnrUgw8gBqC9//SfXHJ4sq6PraUMd3N4ZjqyORFgQVQNXoxevAE4iRnJhD0fqk2Sy10vztpj+V9kg5ovCpwS+dpcr+0yu9FAx/310Sb7S2R4M14eUpUEEppF6HXupS/2IRraprXQKzHZII/jjtOcV1nt65fBDNKiK7IplQ== Received: from [216.39.60.169] by nm22.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jan 2016 12:14:03 -0000 Received: from [98.138.226.242] by tm5.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jan 2016 12:14:03 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp113.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jan 2016 12:14:03 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 33350.12056.bm@smtp113.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Message-ID: <33350.12056.bm@smtp113.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: DeEdkD0VM1mV6VYbIMAdPPDG5g_eXOfjsLiXBM8.CHC.RcH SLkIDgPb64v_7CzRoZ3W9sujDRpk.k2PP3dfAh1DxLGCSwREIF.MVTJRXwF_ 7i2LKwcMmuaBJkpgC8WiKgEV.KLa4JQk4Hxf_2lwckT8qKwlsg8jqjDi5th. 366GXtJoDHjmU2jn1wHkP9GqdfrzNtauGMrT0apnjSP3_02WbRH6KdWXBeC8 77Qg9inzlRsjuhHiTNtgMzdNFuF5DJPRUOTqS1d4GJmJmOZ1ESznB3f28dv2 xJoXryltYWBnVl4OZ88AbkV2Nj5mqnJer.n2l4b0Ebn4rfOMmNHIElhls7Gr CiZJ0NrViMR8DX5JQIxoLN9BqPusYGAaI4OVN7KTXmSqcgz3.1EQenw6ZgfC q2RCfXXXLP07hN4eeXFTGPAjuBeCzA2rtQBrWHwfIoZfsqhzm3J.OQF28KMo 8pQ9spfm676dWewqW_.Fjz_DZDZDou.EUF5H_fY0zmvyIfO8ORtREtOMjbdt 5OEdE07_GA7F_6qzsvtcfNu4FNDTpM.6jJ5dWgKWDC5t5VhDR9_jX4kQ- X-Yahoo-SMTP: Kz_aW1.swBBYof3zAD7.RWzXz9ZAQVDMml1VADsbgPT4Kq79LC0- Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 12:12:53 +0000 From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Install Unix on a laptop with Windows OS References: <33018666.1010913.1452316374119.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <33018666.1010913.1452316374119.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <20160109122254.32c91434@fujitsu> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 12:17:41 -0000 from Eax Melanhovich: > Still according to my experience this is a bad idea. Last time I tried > something like this Windows was corrupting boot loader from time to > time so it was impossible to boot anything except Windows. > I would recommend to use one OS you are using most often and run > second under VirtualBox. Or using two separate computers one for each > OS if possible. This way you will escape a lot of possible problems. > On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 05:12:54 +0000 (UTC) > Eleonora Marchioretti via freebsd-questions > wrote: > > Hi > > I would like to know if it is possible to install UNIX (not Linux) on > > a laptop that has already a Windows OS and if you have instructions > > to do it.Thank you in advance. Best regardsEleonora Another possibility, if laptop has an eSATA port, is to install FreeBSD on an eSATA hard drive, or SATA hard drive in a hard-drive enclosure that has eSATA. Only current brand of eSATA hard drive that I know is Micronet Fantom (www.micronet.com). It may be necessary to install GRUB2 to a USB stick and boot from that; from there it should be able to boot anything on an eSATA hard drive. On my computer, eSATA looks just like SATA to my motherboard/BIOS/UEFI, and FreeBSD and NetBSD work more dependably on eSATA than USB 3.0; I don't know if NetBSD even works on USB 3.0. Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jan 9 12:54:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE15DA688C6 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 12:54:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 430C41554 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 12:53:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Received: from testbox.news4all.se (testbox.usenet4all.se [10.0.0.3]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id u09CSTem074747 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 13:28:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" From: Bernt Hansson Subject: Printer question Message-ID: <5690FCED.7000401@bananmonarki.se> Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 13:28:29 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 12:54:02 -0000 Hello list! I have a question about laserjet printers that support HPGL. How do one switch from ps/pcl/pjl to hpgl the code for doing so under dos is Ec%#B where # is 0 or 1. But how to do that with a print filter? /B From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jan 9 13:35:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6688AA69654 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 13:35:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BA561770 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 13:35:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-101-208.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.101.208]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F9843CE3E; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 14:34:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id u09DYvYM002070; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 14:34:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 14:34:56 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Bernt Hansson Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Printer question Message-Id: <20160109143456.74f48f42.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <5690FCED.7000401@bananmonarki.se> References: <5690FCED.7000401@bananmonarki.se> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 13:35:02 -0000 On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 13:28:29 +0100, Bernt Hansson wrote: > I have a question about laserjet printers that support HPGL. > > How do one switch from ps/pcl/pjl to hpgl the code for doing so under > dos is Ec%#B where # is 0 or 1. > > But how to do that with a print filter? Understand the printer filter basically as a program that reads from standard input, does some magic, and writes to standard output. The input "language" usually is PS, and the output will be redirected to where the printer will accept actual input - a network address, a parallel port, a file, whatever. But as part of the magic, the program can write _anything_ it desires to standard output. Let the print filter look like this: #!/bin/sh /usr/bin/printf "Ec%1B" || exit 2 /usr/local/bin/your_hpgl_filter -outfile - && exit 0 exit 2 Depending on your experience of printer behaviour, it _might_ be needed to code printf "Ec%1B\r\n" to add a DOS-like line break (CR _and_ LF) if the printer should require it. Test this if needed. Of course you can switch back by coding printf "Ec%0B" at a later step, for example if you want to combine HP-GL with PCL or PS (if the printer should support that). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jan 9 14:37:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9EEA68BA1 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 14:37:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@bertram-scharpf.de) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [217.72.192.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.kundenserver.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A3271F21 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 14:37:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@bertram-scharpf.de) Received: from becker.bs.l ([85.180.10.125]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M6DsI-1ZyqJc13r0-00yBJp for ; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 15:37:14 +0100 Received: from bsch by becker.bs.l with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1aHudk-000OrG-Uw for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 15:37:12 +0100 Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 15:37:12 +0100 From: Bertram Scharpf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Printer question Message-ID: <20160109143712.GA94931@becker.bs.l> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <5690FCED.7000401@bananmonarki.se> <20160109143456.74f48f42.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160109143456.74f48f42.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: Bertram Scharpf X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:2O12OLj3zxflAzIQpiBQ4qxynqPjF3GcWAxdmgeeXqk2F3J96g3 1gc2jdKvzoONSAX9zMRv5dKSKcH2PaoshVllZj0CHiOPsYN3eZxJyYM3HWmdt7jNSUuGLJ9 GeXUIUxRRf9PN6Zzj3Hiv3BbWzQk252Qf53kBVjRAApBPLr/CW0/umt5gV1JQEovTMxXXpx lxjcDN+zlgc1OOvlO87Mw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:8RgiGmF9PAw=:Gf9jRb3Zx4swwxIFpiN+2Y MkA4j6sUdxifJKLZBpmgkoNjJPCEkNSiI/rF6LOscMgAvWXzSyU8KZM8E1zej1c/M3QUOLpIk akDdGfGjbDItC1c+i0HqRb20wCvSCQFPp2taQsmZ35S5WLbLQCW09pGdBzSpvyUwVg9z2ND+c 94L3TkbcLq8yduAoILeSwSNzRw9o0K9YfxnpgcpqEWDnLtdexAeWUJk/BQ2/R82H5Zn1HWdJw CRwFhOg3iwYlGyJ8hJk9k0oPeXT3L31iZrhuSnN8C4Iby2N4d/RbZXu3pSWaAK4qmc61td7L2 k8KBctn0apJ2TD9wS5vMkZuSZLIU7Fe9uP6qdtfvBCCeO0ANk473km/ahFRcnHdlymWSil3t8 Wuh0Lc4x2+m2ehB0ePxc5FDxwSMmXkmP0P2OvUhs6r+25DOWDJjB1VbI7vKFywemJv9HxPoY4 S5cz7DNFdJopZonUsGH9L9fJn50WQnylWH1C4CcA4GYtLRidnoJ0hK3HEdh4ODyI5CItpz8Ff YpWWA2P3JEQoa2SrJ0d7I1FvErw+JJ9AsoLq6YPw0sYLnBmZcnyom6XbQgit1I3iFznd0yuBN km4i1mm1Wa9wlfwyjA9XILFUCL4LuZZLhbTRKBFLpCZaWvD/DZEYDrMZLXwtqd4dDlrKCdre2 HjcVV5WMZX6DoSHUUQKCPJw+i1bfpX+LPpiAzMyo3RpGAR8inUmJ6lCex9Mdd5axK0Ks= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 14:37:23 -0000 Hi, On Saturday, 09. Jan 2016, 14:34:56 +0100, Polytropon wrote: > On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 13:28:29 +0100, Bernt Hansson wrote: > > I have a question about laserjet printers that support HPGL. > > > > How do one switch from ps/pcl/pjl to hpgl the code for doing so under > > dos is Ec%#B where # is 0 or 1. > > > > But how to do that with a print filter? > > /usr/bin/printf "Ec%1B" || exit 2 First, it is not "Ec" (Letters E and c) but an escape (ASCII 0x1b). Second, the correct way to switch from PJL to another language is to say something like print "@PJL ENTER LANGUAGE = HPGL2\r\n" Probably it's a good idea to ensure you're in PJL mode before giving PJL commands. print "\e%-12345X@PJL\r\n@PJL ENTER LANGUAGE = HPGL2\r\n" Maybe it could be even possible to go the whole way round to PJL, from there to PCL and then to HPGL. print "\e%-12345X@PJL\r\n@PJL ENTER LANGUAGE = PCL\r\n\e%1B" You can see some output like that when you give the command $ echo "showpage" | gs -q -dBATCH -dPARANOIDSAFER -dQUIET -dNOPAUSE -sDEVICE=ljet4pjl -r600 -sOutputFile=- - | less I will not tie myself to an exact answer because I do not know which printer model you're using. Just play around until you found a solution that works. Bertram -- Bertram Scharpf Stuttgart, Deutschland/Germany http://www.bertram-scharpf.de From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jan 9 17:03:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72710A684CA for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 17:03:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com (mail-wm0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 132A91E16 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 17:03:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id b14so212523577wmb.1 for ; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 09:03:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=QxzZOaruZE++Pfqr+lwesyn1ARw/ku4FQNMUyvpctSA=; b=wZpHkHoRK0k5+QDP2JVejpWJrVJI5qVWr7kil7QE0ic+D/BJUrDF3hktIqJU64nswv S71X4cDZtI9x7IzGerzeuS7vrXl7nd27vQJpsLPaTeCs+0naqTtfQGUcymIjp/pHIC/y AO//ef364mER0mxBpMDPZNr4rdMQxX224etJCgubpw5EAvcBgXM4qxIBQWDiWl/s7fEb hTCtA2hrrzua6jk6ZDkWoFkbHHBZhFHiCt1TMggTMc7D1EZZ/kNQLmAg7LYluMk2iA4x N7qUAs/PMurMMIjDoCQOSvNXdObbEOFAPMHl6SK5LhQRluu6ZdNz4EPBHjX5FHBLmnKZ VRDg== X-Received: by 10.28.213.204 with SMTP id m195mr3560178wmg.53.1452358979456; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 09:02:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.190.195 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 09:02:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <569040D5.4030105@sliderule.demon.co.uk> References: <569040D5.4030105@sliderule.demon.co.uk> From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 20:02:20 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: pkg-static: Plist error, directory listed as a file To: Steve Burton Cc: User Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 17:03:01 -0000 On 9 January 2016 at 02:05, Steve Burton wrote: > On 08/01/2016 10:00, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > >> Happy New Year! >> >> Anyone has a clue as to how I can overcome this error? >> >> root@gw:/usr/ports/devel/py-pyasn1 # make install >> ===> Installing for py27-pyasn1-0.1.9 >> ===> py27-pyasn1-0.1.9 depends on package: py27-setuptools27>0 - found >> ===> py27-pyasn1-0.1.9 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.7 - found >> ===> Registering installation for py27-pyasn1-0.1.9 >> pkg-static: Plist error, directory listed as a file: >> lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyasn1-0.1.9-py2.7.egg-info >> *** Error code 74 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/devel/py-pyasn1. >> >> >> There's a note in UPDATING for this. > > Steve. > Thanks Steve. That entry was ore useful than what I had seen by googling. I managed to install the util I needed - security/letsencrypt after overcoming this error. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 "Oh, the cruft." From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jan 9 17:29:16 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C845A69420 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 17:29:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@bertram-scharpf.de) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.kundenserver.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE2E91197 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 17:29:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@bertram-scharpf.de) Received: from becker.bs.l ([85.180.1.108]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MGJhX-1aNmc20Fzr-00FBwT for ; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 18:29:13 +0100 Received: from bsch by becker.bs.l with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1aHxKC-000PQ5-4P for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 18:29:12 +0100 Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 18:29:12 +0100 From: Bertram Scharpf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Install Unix on a laptop with Windows OS Message-ID: <20160109172912.GA97687@becker.bs.l> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <33018666.1010913.1452316374119.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <33018666.1010913.1452316374119.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <20160109122254.32c91434@fujitsu> <33350.12056.bm@smtp113.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <33350.12056.bm@smtp113.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: Bertram Scharpf X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:3ZvideQOcf6HT3I+rFaKBkzjLhiJiVv2gK277ofwQ4fVh2QUv4N uRwH/R3Y2mq63fshG+zlw6MSlXroHBeurJrH6mDx1+17Fz+TBmN6vszNAhqFSrpIrqTv5d4 pNEDDAvwkqQD7U7n5EyJoXAoNj1O+PczR79SuAXQa2gfgqex7NO0ThVtZ05lQGqYkHda0OR bUqUZRnel2gb6MWZk6ajg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:6rNTO2blhCM=:WXnY919HHCoF/UYDBSALHT VdtvBqUrmLaIKTpy6LU/La1+fxSqj0V+qFJq5rJ8I18ZKMlgZv579kEWH5APhYQP+3fMguGJS 5EIKFC3MsWyW5wnCUmsQZMVcmAdnxTBAeqiCJOnxmKKvjFgL/Mx8WKLHs0/56XxYbzNZwkjic dPMyav2xjt+8iaNh/m++Da3YwlndSWDCcmjkbAZ+0HtfQtaohllblvFNnosNQzrgcCxeF6Y6u 62gADdZNuEEXeJLn6NFE3jVEBkOpmb4OppYxc3WTgkaDLEE3uHdOnAARIaeOzuL3MbZpeB/lQ UCQjDX0I47o4cVKCtVNNTmFQ9rbTbQFLEWaAFIQiYLLp7uK/RwiT2hO9JBnLupmX/N1KyVgdt 4HOzkRM/CTdfwKcb1s1o6uVFAVwg7Hbm3a0D7NxIfaFxiptn6cIvsvlYMev/5hFIyT7mLiJ+I uQl72ItxE4GpnfkCVrXxQ2TAJH6MU4KI5VSmgr4LSr5ZK+HI8n7Q7/Uantrdk+lkMkTcoWtET fHUpaarSMDP6GWfLTaBYTviMXeR5SQaGVb2Rrba0fL7lf0aEOupVL3uQ9ZV77YjNjG+8Jj0MY zcVKbSK2R72ms9V/2/6pvi+svlnsKesmfzb0/N/SmSnsqS2aHeWmTmi6BDJsveoncxAGOY0Sg z4k3OD/8MyVQx0hK2ZTqh7ZGeqWkssQoIeKHtwBwUaic8KQeWS2l779BULhN6Q12KSoc= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 17:29:16 -0000 Hi, On Saturday, 09. Jan 2016, 12:12:53 +0000, Thomas Mueller wrote: > from Eax Melanhovich: > > On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 05:12:54 +0000 (UTC) > > Eleonora Marchioretti > > wrote: > > > > I would like to know if it is possible to install UNIX (not Linux) on > > > a laptop that has already a Windows OS and if you have instructions > > > to do it. > > > Still according to my experience this is a bad idea. Last time I tried > > something like this Windows was corrupting boot loader from time to > > time so it was impossible to boot anything except Windows. > > > Another possibility, if laptop has an eSATA port, is to > install FreeBSD on an eSATA hard drive, or SATA hard drive > in a hard-drive enclosure that has eSATA. > > It may be necessary to install GRUB2 to a USB stick and > boot from that; from there it should be able to boot > anything on an eSATA hard drive. You could also try to boot from a USB stick whose /etc/fstab then mounts partions of the _first_ hard drive on /usr, /usr/home etc. Bertram -- Bertram Scharpf Stuttgart, Deutschland/Germany http://www.bertram-scharpf.de From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jan 9 19:09:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F594A69762 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 19:09:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBDCF1465 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 19:09:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Received: from testbox.news4all.se (testbox.usenet4all.se [10.0.0.3]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id u09J9hEo081810 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 20:09:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Subject: Re: Printer question To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <5690FCED.7000401@bananmonarki.se> <20160109143456.74f48f42.freebsd@edvax.de> <20160109143712.GA94931@becker.bs.l> From: Bernt Hansson Message-ID: <56915AF7.7020508@bananmonarki.se> Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 20:09:43 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160109143712.GA94931@becker.bs.l> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 19:09:49 -0000 On 2016-01-09 15:37, Bertram Scharpf wrote: > Hi, > > On Saturday, 09. Jan 2016, 14:34:56 +0100, Polytropon wrote: >> On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 13:28:29 +0100, Bernt Hansson wrote: >>> I have a question about laserjet printers that support HPGL. >>> >>> How do one switch from ps/pcl/pjl to hpgl the code for doing so under >>> dos is Ec%#B where # is 0 or 1. >>> >>> But how to do that with a print filter? >> /usr/bin/printf "Ec%1B" || exit 2 > First, it is not "Ec" (Letters E and c) but an escape (ASCII 0x1b). > > Second, the correct way to switch from PJL to another > language is to say something like > > print "@PJL ENTER LANGUAGE = HPGL2\r\n" > > Probably it's a good idea to ensure you're in PJL mode > before giving PJL commands. > > print "\e%-12345X@PJL\r\n@PJL ENTER LANGUAGE = HPGL2\r\n" > > Maybe it could be even possible to go the whole way round to > PJL, from there to PCL and then to HPGL. > > print "\e%-12345X@PJL\r\n@PJL ENTER LANGUAGE = PCL\r\n\e%1B" > > You can see some output like that when you give the command > > $ echo "showpage" | gs -q -dBATCH -dPARANOIDSAFER -dQUIET -dNOPAUSE -sDEVICE=ljet4pjl -r600 -sOutputFile=- - | less > > I will not tie myself to an exact answer because I do not > know which printer model you're using. Sorry, It's hp laserjet p2055d and laserjet 2100n even an officejet G55. > Just play around > until you found a solution that works. I will. Just wanted a ballpark to begin with. > Bertram /B From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jan 9 22:37:38 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D65A6A33D for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 22:37:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@chroot.pl) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55DAF1BB9 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 22:37:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@chroot.pl) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 535ABA6A33C; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 22:37:38 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F92A6A33B for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 22:37:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@chroot.pl) Received: from mail.apsz.com.pl (mail.apsz.com.pl [91.217.18.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16B1E1BB8 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 22:37:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@chroot.pl) Received: from chroot.pl (89-78-33-126.dynamic.chello.pl [89.78.33.126]) by mail.apsz.com.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 164E145777 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 23:37:28 +0100 (CET) From: Lukasz Subject: samba and file locks - solved To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <56918B68.2090000@chroot.pl> Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 23:36:24 +0100 User-Agent: WebMail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_50,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail.apsz.com.pl X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at mail.apsz.com.pl X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Level: ** X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 22:37:38 -0000 Hello again, Sysctl security.bsd.see_other_gids variable caused problems with file locks. If it's set to 0 the problem appears. If it is set to 1 (default) everything works as expected. Regards Lukasz From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jan 9 22:48:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64362A6A76A for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 22:48:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lukasz@chroot.pl) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48DF1117D for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 22:48:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lukasz@chroot.pl) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 460CBA6A769; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 22:48:15 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD04A6A768 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 22:48:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lukasz@chroot.pl) Received: from mail.apsz.com.pl (mail.apsz.com.pl [91.217.18.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A025A117C for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 22:48:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lukasz@chroot.pl) Received: from chroot.pl (89-78-33-126.dynamic.chello.pl [89.78.33.126]) by mail.apsz.com.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 785D54566F for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 23:48:12 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: samba and file locks - solved To: questions@freebsd.org References: <568E80EF.4090001@chroot.pl> From: Lukasz Message-ID: <56918DEC.7070503@chroot.pl> Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 23:47:08 +0100 User-Agent: WebMail MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <568E80EF.4090001@chroot.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_50,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail.apsz.com.pl X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at mail.apsz.com.pl X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Level: ** X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 22:48:15 -0000 Hello again, Sysctl security.bsd.see_other_gids variable caused problems with file locks. If it's set to 0 the problem appears. If it is set to 1 (default) everything works as expected. Regards Lukasz On 01/07/2016 04:14 PM, FreeBSD wrote: > Hello, > > I have a problem with file locks on share. My server is running > FreeBSD 10.2 (amd64), samba 4.3.3 (ROLE_ACTIVE_DIRECTORY_DC) and ZFS > pool (raidz) as a windows share. > There is a strange behavior when I open a file from one windows > workstation (smbstatus shows DENY_WRITE and everything seems right) and > after about 5 minutes later I open the same file, which is still edited > on first computer, from other windows workstation. At this moment I > should see a warning message which inform that the file is going to be > opened in read-only mode but nothing happen. The file is opened normally > in read-write mode, so I can write into this file from both workstations > at the same time overwriting data! It looks like the file lock doesn't > work any more. > > log.smbd shows: > ../source3/smbd/close.c:268(close_remove_share_mode) > close_remove_share_mode: Could not get share mode lock for file > data/filename > > I noticed the same situation with share based on UFS. > > Below is my smb4.conf. > > [global] > dos charset = CP852 > unix charset = ISO8859-2 > workgroup = WORKGROUP > realm = somedomain.int > server role = active directory domain controller > passdb backend = samba_dsdb > min receivefile size = 16384 > kernel change notify = No > dns forwarder = 192.168.1.1 > nsupdate command = /usr/local/bin/samba-nsupdate -g > rpc_server:tcpip = no > rpc_daemon:spoolssd = embedded > rpc_server:spoolss = embedded > rpc_server:winreg = embedded > rpc_server:ntsvcs = embedded > rpc_server:eventlog = embedded > rpc_server:srvsvc = embedded > rpc_server:svcctl = embedded > rpc_server:default = external > winbindd:use external pipes = true > idmap config nc:range = 10000-20000 > idmap config nc:backend = ad > idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes > idmap config * : backend = tdb > aio read size = 16384 > aio write size = 16384 > aio write behind = true > write cache size = 262144 > map archive = No > map readonly = no > store dos attributes = Yes > vfs objects = dfs_samba4 acl_xattr > > [sysvol] > path = /var/db/samba4/sysvol > read only = No > vfs objects = acl_xattr > > [SHARE1] > comment = SHARE1 > path = /mnt/zfs_share/SHARE1 > read only = No > guest ok = Yes > map acl inherit = Yes > oplocks = No > level2 oplocks = No > vfs objects = zfsacl > nfs4:chown = Yes > nfs4:acedup = dontcare > nfs4:mode = simple > > Is this a bug in samba? Or I missed something. > > Thank you for any suggestions. > > Regards > > Lukasz > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >