Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 22:32:00 +0200 From: Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Cc: pcvs@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/159700: repocopy databases/db51 to databases/db5 Message-ID: <E1Qrbv6-0007fz-KJ@apollo.emma.line.org> Resent-Message-ID: <201108112040.p7BKe8LD020574@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 159700 >Category: ports >Synopsis: repocopy databases/db51 to databases/db5 >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Thu Aug 11 20:40:08 UTC 2011 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Matthias Andree >Release: FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE amd64 >Organization: FreeBSD app store :) >Environment: System: FreeBSD apollo.emma.line.org 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #11: Fri Aug 5 22:53:55 CEST 2011 toor@apollo.emma.line.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 >Description: Please repocopy databases/db51 to databases/db5 (not db52!) - I plan to create a new port, based on db51, that follows the latest db5.X release from Oracle so as to avoid the mess that db4.x needlessly(1) left behind, which will start out as db5-5.2. (1) pkgsrc got away with just one db4 port, why can't we? Let's try for db5.x. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1Qrbv6-0007fz-KJ>