From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Apr  2 19:46:12 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C06B01065670;
	Thu,  2 Apr 2009 19:46:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scf@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mail.farley.org (mail.farley.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f0f:20:2::11])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F37D8FC0A;
	Thu,  2 Apr 2009 19:46:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scf@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from thor.farley.org (HPooka@thor.farley.org
	[IPv6:2001:470:1f0f:20:1::5])
	by mail.farley.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n32JkBpR015371;
	Thu, 2 Apr 2009 14:46:11 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from scf@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 14:46:11 -0500 (CDT)
From: "Sean C. Farley" <scf@FreeBSD.org>
To: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090402183346.GA32707@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904021444010.20710@thor.farley.org>
References: <23488525@bb.ipt.ru>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.0904021222330.20710@thor.farley.org>
	<20090402183346.GA32707@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS
	autolearn=ham version=3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on mail.farley.org
Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: HEADSUP: new linux infrastructure ports are committed
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
	<freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:46:15 -0000

On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Roman Divacky wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 12:33:42PM -0500, Sean C. Farley wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>>
>>> Hello List,
>>>
>>> I've just committed new Linux Fedora 8 infrastructure ports. That 
>>> was a long awaited commit. Thanks for all who helped me here. 47 new 
>>> ports are introduced as well as a new linux ports infrastructure 
>>> which made it possible to co-exist ports from different linux 
>>> distros at our ports tree. The worked lasted for more than a year.
>>
>> Thank you to all involved.
>>
>> *snip*
>>
>>> As you may already know, only 8-CURRENT is compatible with 
>>> compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.16. FreeBSD-7.x is not fully compatible 
>>> due to lack of some syscalls, etc. Those syscalls cannot be MFCed 
>>> due to native FreeBSD ABI breakage. Some applications may work fine 
>>> though.
>>
>> What cannot be MFC'd besides TLS and NPTL?  For syscalls that cannot 
>> be 
>
> linuxulator in RELENG_7 supports TLS/NPTL

Hmm.  I thought it was, but the wiki said otherwise.

Maybe the wiki is referring to MFC'ing to RELENG_6?

Sean
-- 
scf@FreeBSD.org