Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:21:08 +0300 From: Chagin Dmitry <dchagin@freebsd.org> To: "Sam Fourman Jr." <sfourman@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] futexes, flash9 related Message-ID: <20090209132108.GA27104@dchagin.static.corbina.ru> In-Reply-To: <11167f520902090511i52adaa7dm9c44025578aecf2c@mail.gmail.com> References: <20081221174939.GA33531@dchagin.dialup.corbina.ru> <747dc8f30902050220y7b1d726bj9f6f83afa843b520@mail.gmail.com> <20090206063550.GA2123@dchagin.static.corbina.ru> <1233919189.1866.13.camel@localhost> <20090206122354.GA5670@dchagin.static.corbina.ru> <1233923734.1866.33.camel@localhost> <20090208200541.GA59299@dchagin.static.corbina.ru> <747dc8f30902090501l58979723l8e0de51482131991@mail.gmail.com> <11167f520902090511i52adaa7dm9c44025578aecf2c@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 07:11:36AM -0600, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: > >> please, try http://lnxx64.googlecode.com/files/futexes_partial_II.patch > >> first patch fail at i386... > > What is the syntax to apply this patch to -CURRENT, also can this > patch be applied to i386 as well as amd64? > > Sam hi, yes, of course. I usually make only compile-test for the i386, but this time tested on a workstation :) previous version of the patch did not work on i386. ps. I suspect that flash9 have problems that can not be solved in the emulator. can someone test flash_v10? -- Have fun! chd
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090209132108.GA27104>