Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 17 Jun 2004 01:16:08 -0700
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>
To:        adridg@cs.kun.nl
Cc:        freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: new binutils broken for amd64
Message-ID:  <20040617081608.GC79565@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0406171010010.6866-100000@wn4.sci.kun.nl>
References:  <1087442023.22390.2.camel@server.mcneil.com> <Pine.GSO.4.44.0406171010010.6866-100000@wn4.sci.kun.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 10:11:06AM +0200, Adriaan de Groot wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, Sean McNeil wrote:
> > for freebsd/amd64.  These should be set when host and target are the
> > same.  This is causing all sorts of compilation problems.
> 
> I just built a new world and kernel from -current as of June 16th, 19:00
> GMT and noticed no such ill effects.

The [possible] ill effects reported on this list would only happen when
building software that used libs not in /lib or /usr/lib -- ie, not in
the default search path.

Can anyone else do some testing of this issue and let the list know your
results?

thanks,
-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040617081608.GC79565>