From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 17 08:16:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2E716A4CE; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 08:16:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from TRANG.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75EF843D2F; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 08:16:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by TRANG.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5H8G9A7080183; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 01:16:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5H8G8HY080181; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 01:16:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 01:16:08 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: adridg@cs.kun.nl Message-ID: <20040617081608.GC79565@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <1087442023.22390.2.camel@server.mcneil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Sean McNeil cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new binutils broken for amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 08:16:18 -0000 On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 10:11:06AM +0200, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, Sean McNeil wrote: > > for freebsd/amd64. These should be set when host and target are the > > same. This is causing all sorts of compilation problems. > > I just built a new world and kernel from -current as of June 16th, 19:00 > GMT and noticed no such ill effects. The [possible] ill effects reported on this list would only happen when building software that used libs not in /lib or /usr/lib -- ie, not in the default search path. Can anyone else do some testing of this issue and let the list know your results? thanks, -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)