From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 24 23:03:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF329106566C; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 23:03:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6DB8FC13; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 23:03:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id pBON3uIp069419; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 15:03:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id pBON3uHA069418; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 15:03:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 15:03:56 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20111224230356.GA69395@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <201112241216.pBOCGd1H012696@svn.freebsd.org> <4EF645D2.8080407@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EF645D2.8080407@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, Marius Strobl , src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r228857 - in head/usr.bin: . csup X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 23:03:56 -0000 On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 01:36:18PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > On 12/24/2011 04:16, Marius Strobl wrote: > > On FreeBSD just use the MD5 implementation of libmd rather than that of > > libcrypto so we don't need to relinquish csup when world is built without > > OpenSSL. > > Did you benchmark this at all? I agree that keeping csup available > absent openssl is a good goal, but csup is a prototypical "tool that > does the same thing many thousands of times" so even tiny regressions > could add up to a large cost in wall clock time. > > If the openssl version is faster, then conditionalizing where to get md5 > is probably the right answer. If libmd is faster, then it's a net win. :) > Imagine that! A request from someone, who is a staunch anti-profiled lib supporter, to (I don't know) profile a change to the system. -- Steve