From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Oct 16 15:20:11 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B9B016A416;
	Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:20:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carlos@unesp.br)
Received: from armstrong.unesp.br (armstrong.unesp.br [200.145.1.3])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2DFD43D46;
	Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:20:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from carlos@unesp.br)
Received: from legolas.ai.unesp.br (legolas.ai.unesp.br [200.145.2.13])
	by armstrong.unesp.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F75B78C86;
	Mon, 16 Oct 2006 12:20:07 -0300 (BRT)
From: Carlos Coletti <carlos@unesp.br>
To: sobomax@FreeBSD.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 12:20:05 -0300
Message-Id: <1161012005.4981.98.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: FreeBSD Port: asterisk-1.2.12.1
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: carlos@unesp.br
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:20:11 -0000

Hi,

I work at UNESP - Brazil, a government university of Sao Paulo state.

We are using Asterisk 1.2.9.1_1 and we are experiencing some troubles
with this version regarding Pickupgroups:

- The Asterisk documentation says it can handle groups named 0 up to 63,
but it only supports 0 to 31 (as if the version was 1.0).

I would appreciate any help.
Thank you,

Carlos Coletti