Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 13:30:17 +0400 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" <sat@freebsd.org> To: vd@freebsd.org Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, osa@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/ftp/gwget Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/ftp/gwget/files patch-src__gwget_data.c patch-src_gwget_data.c patch-src_main.c patch-src_wget-log.c Message-ID: <cb5206420605110230t694a9e0el3ef40fbaa2dc82fc@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20060511052958.GA69280@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> References: <200605101908.k4AJ89iI073410@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060511052958.GA69280@qlovarnika.bg.datamax>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/11/06, Vasil Dimov <vd@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:08:09PM +0000, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > sat 2006-05-10 19:08:09 UTC > [...] > > 1.1 +10 -0 ports/ftp/gwget/files/patch-src__gwget_data.c (n= ew) > > 1.2 +0 -10 ports/ftp/gwget/files/patch-src_gwget_data.c (de= ad) > > About the patches filenaming under files/ we are trying to follow some > convention - see ports/Tools/scripts/splitpatch.pl, it's best to always > use that for generating the file names for new patches. Thanks, I'll take a good look. > The reason for not renaming all ports/*/*/files/* to conform to a single > convention is that the history would be lost. > > You should avoid renaming files this way (whatever the new and the > old names are) because the history is lost. I understand this very clearly, the file had no history though, it's just one missing header which should probable be pushed upstream. Thanks!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cb5206420605110230t694a9e0el3ef40fbaa2dc82fc>