From owner-cvs-all Sat Jan 19 4:43:35 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8054337B402; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 04:43:26 -0800 (PST) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0JChNI08869; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 15:43:23 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 15:43:22 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" To: Kris Kennaway Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_opie pam_opie.c Message-ID: <20020119124322.GB8776@nagual.pp.ru> References: <200201191009.g0JA95b91076@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020119042808.A67985@xor.obsecurity.org> <20020119123903.GA8776@nagual.pp.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020119123903.GA8776@nagual.pp.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 15:39:03 +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 04:28:10 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 02:09:05AM -0800, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > > > ache 2002/01/19 02:09:05 PST > > >=20 > > > Modified files: > > > lib/libpam/modules/pam_opie pam_opie.c=20 > > > Log: > > > If user not exist in OPIE system, return failure immediately instead > > > of producing fake prompts with random numbers which can be detected= by > > > potential intruder in two tries and totally confuse non-OPIE users. > >=20 > > Wait a minute..was this discussed anywhere? >=20 > We already live with this "change" several years when S/Key was here and > nobody complaints. This is not a change, this is return to old way as it > must be. >=20 > This change have nothing common to security, just eliminate obscurity. And what really must be discussed, is complete incompatibilities list bringed by S/Key -> OPIE switch, not due to OPIE new way of things but due to oversights or misinterpretations how it must be configured. And it was not discussed. And I am only one who try to bring OPIE into good old S/Key shape. --=20 Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ --PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3ia iQCVAwUBPElp6uJgpPLZnQjrAQHRDAP/RuIJZPyUOTGn4Nk7SOipdMjZ/+MKNp6X 75QHQDGYUvr28ncr4rZNckpbA6bo1KRHt1sI0XaXkc0u4tBJb9hI45SAb9Ci+fBq Hofnp1XyNr4rGYp62Fo6eST7l4OwQhKx/107yMxShbWK3YwvgeLet2k9VQJ5fuQ8 dAhmgzJO2tc= =wDXI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message