Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 18:42:01 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> To: frank xu <bsdman@hotmail.com> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: potentially simpler approach than scheduler activations. Message-ID: <20001116184200.L18037@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <F99h9vXsFFsAitVGeSJ000001f0@hotmail.com>; from bsdman@hotmail.com on Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 10:24:27AM %2B0800 References: <F99h9vXsFFsAitVGeSJ000001f0@hotmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* frank xu <bsdman@hotmail.com> [001116 18:25] wrote: > I have readed an article about KSE from jasone, it's cool, can complete > resolve much headache, but you method has same problems as LinuxThread, > jasone already > talked about it, in new FreeBSD 5.0, why can't we have a new way to go? Actually KSE is closer to Linuxthreads than my suggestion from my point of view. Can you elaborate a bit? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001116184200.L18037>