From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 10 22:47:22 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBCD116A417 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 22:47:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8009F13C461 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 22:47:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 10 Aug 2007 18:47:21 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.3-GA) with ESMTP id NQP70651; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:47:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 65-78-26-179.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([65.78.26.179]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 10 Aug 2007 18:47:21 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18108.60153.355168.203495@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:47:21 -0400 To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <46BCE783.2010407@cam.ac.uk> References: <46BC51C3.1020103@cam.ac.uk> <20070810123939.GA84642@ei.bzerk.org> <46BCE783.2010407@cam.ac.uk> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: Subject: Re: Remove ports dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 22:47:22 -0000 Christopher Key writes: > I do have another query though; pkg_cutleaves is supposed to show > you a list of of packages upon which nothing depends. In theory > this means that there should be nothing in this list beyond the > ports I've explicitly installed. This theory is incorrect. > However, I do seem to have gained autoconf, automake, gmake, > help2man and libtool. Am I right in thinking that these were > required for building / installing something at some point, but > that nothing would break if I were to remove them? I'm not sure about help2man, but for the others: yes. The price will be having them automatically reinstalled every time a port is built which uses them. While doing so will not take long ... none of these is a space-hog, nor do they adversely affect system operation. General practice is to leave them be. Robert Huff