From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Oct 31 16:31:52 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from news-ma.rhein-neckar.de (news-ma.rhein-neckar.de [193.197.90.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BBBE151B7 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 1999 16:31:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from daemon@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de) Received: from bigeye.rhein-neckar.de (uucp@localhost) by news-ma.rhein-neckar.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with bsmtp id BAA10953 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 1 Nov 1999 01:31:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from daemon@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by bigeye.rhein-neckar.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA62399 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 1 Nov 1999 01:20:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from daemon) From: naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de (Christian Weisgerber) Subject: Re: Upgrading ports and existing programs Date: 1 Nov 1999 01:20:58 +0100 Message-ID: <7vimda$1sth$1@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de> References: <87zowz8e4j.fsf@mired.eh.local> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG J McKitrick wrote: > I thought the pkg commands were just for binary only packages, not ports? Mostly. However, an installed port is indistinguishable from an installed package. Both have the same entries under /var/db/pkg and both are removed with pkg_delete(1). -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message