Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 26 Jul 2003 09:47:14 -0700
From:      Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
To:        Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
Cc:        Shawn <drevil@warpcore.org>
Subject:   Re: Memory Mangement Problem in 5.1-RELEASE
Message-ID:  <20030726164714.GA67851@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
In-Reply-To: <3F221E08.FAE1638C@mindspring.com>
References:  <000001c3521a$7fa912c0$6bd4bfac@AlHindawi> <1059139238.50681.0.camel@CPE-65-26-140-154.kc.rr.com> <3F221E08.FAE1638C@mindspring.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 11:22:00PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Shawn wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 02:21, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > You probably can't get away with the old gcc, since the binary
> > > format changed For No Good Reason(tm).
> > 
> > Didn't the GNU people say they had to change it to be more ABI compliant
> > with the 'standard'?
> 
> I will believe that when they upgrade their FORTRAN compiler
> to be more compliant with 'the standard'.
> 

The gcc-g95 developers have begun the merge of the Fortran 95
front end and runtime library into the tree-ssa branch of GCC.
The target is to have a Fortran compiler that complies with
ISO/IEC 1539-1:1997 include in gcc-3.5.0.

BTW, the official name of the language is Fortran not FORTRAN.

-- 
Steve



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030726164714.GA67851>