Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 23:58:38 +0200 From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" <h.skuhra@gmail.com> To: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: db41, db42 and db43 are they all needed Message-ID: <20071018215838.GA67603@oslo.ath.cx> In-Reply-To: <7fec743f0710181221w258eef04n8ad01bf1f42d9152@mail.gmail.com> References: <7fec743f0710181221w258eef04n8ad01bf1f42d9152@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tankko <tankko@gmail.com> skrev: > After installing 6.2 and all the ports I use on a new machine, I have: > > apr-db42-1.2.8_2 > db41-4.1.25_4 > db42-4.2.52_5 > > and there is db43 out there as well, probably just waiting to be installed. > > db41-4.1.25_4 is used by: > portupgrade-2.3.1,2 > ruby18-bdb-0.6.2 > > db42-4.2.52_5 is used by: > apr-db42-1.2.8_2 > > Which is required by subverson (I need BDB access in subversion). > > Do I need all these different version of db? I guess there is no > huge downside to having them all installed, but it doesn't seem clean > to my anal-retentive nature. > > Is there a make.conf flag that will just make them all use db42 (or > db43)? Is that wise? Hi, I have put "WITH_BDB_VER=45" to /etc/make.conf. % pkg_info -R db45-4.5.20.0 Information for db45-4.5.20.0: Required by: apr-gdbm-db45-1.2.8_2 mutt-devel-1.5.16_3 portupgrade-devel-2.3.1 ruby18-bdb45-0.6.2 subversion-1.4.4_1 - Herbert
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071018215838.GA67603>