Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 19:41:20 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Pietro Cerutti <gahr@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, fjoe@freebsd.org, bug-followup <bug-followup@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ports/124985: [patch] devel/dmucs unbreak on 64bits archs Message-ID: <20080707164119.GG17123@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <487245AE.1030307@FreeBSD.org> References: <200807071619.m67GJrPt096421@freefall.freebsd.org> <487245AE.1030307@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--c4jr9uOfj6q35Id2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 06:34:54PM +0200, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > I definitely do not agree. Please note that a pointer is not required to > fit into a long, while it is required to fit into a size_t. I do not think that C99 requires the size_t to be capable of holding the pointer. size_t is only required to hold result of sizeof. It is intptr_t type that shall do it. --c4jr9uOfj6q35Id2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkhyRy8ACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4j6ZgCfSKvomeK7drejArboBY/tgHvd 1zcAoMn8dtED9qe8fn+2miiSQSRl7Pmi =5XJf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --c4jr9uOfj6q35Id2--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080707164119.GG17123>