Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 22 Jul 2012 16:05:50 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: "da0: 40.000MB/s transfers" What was rationale behind pegging USB 2.0 at 40MB/s?
Message-ID:  <1342998350089-5729042.post@n5.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+tpaK3qWnh_MUfBAEzTexsJdXu4JP5nPG=z4jJdUUd2qwSUxQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <1342992043358-5729028.post@n5.nabble.com> <CA+tpaK3qWnh_MUfBAEzTexsJdXu4JP5nPG=z4jJdUUd2qwSUxQ@mail.gmail.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
Speaking of misunderstanding, that's certainly 
possible.

How much overhead is "normal" and alternatively, 
why in FreeBSD USB 2.0 reports as "40MB/s" and
not other arbitrary number.

I hope I didn't sound like "PLEASE HELP I WANT 
USB 3.0 SPEEDS ON USB 2.0"...





--
View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/da0-40-000MB-s-transfers-What-was-rationale-behind-pegging-USB-2-0-at-40MB-s-tp5729028p5729042.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1342998350089-5729042.post>