From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 22 23:05:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBF49106564A for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 23:05:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A998FC08 for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 23:05:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1St5Di-00040p-36 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 16:05:50 -0700 Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 16:05:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1342998350089-5729042.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1342992043358-5729028.post@n5.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: "da0: 40.000MB/s transfers" What was rationale behind pegging USB 2.0 at 40MB/s? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 23:05:51 -0000 Speaking of misunderstanding, that's certainly possible. How much overhead is "normal" and alternatively, why in FreeBSD USB 2.0 reports as "40MB/s" and not other arbitrary number. I hope I didn't sound like "PLEASE HELP I WANT USB 3.0 SPEEDS ON USB 2.0"... -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/da0-40-000MB-s-transfers-What-was-rationale-behind-pegging-USB-2-0-at-40MB-s-tp5729028p5729042.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.