Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 26 Oct 2001 11:39:38 -0500
From:      Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>
To:        Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com>
Cc:        iedowse@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/ufs/ufs ufs_dirhash.c
Message-ID:  <20011026113938.D15052@elvis.mu.org>
In-Reply-To: <200110261614.f9QGE1a79204@aldan.algebra.com>; from mi@aldan.algebra.com on Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 12:13:58PM -0400
References:  <200110252255.f9PMtx822787@freefall.freebsd.org> <200110261614.f9QGE1a79204@aldan.algebra.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com> [011026 11:16] wrote:
> On 25 Oct, Ian Dowse wrote:
> > iedowse     2001/10/25 15:55:59 PDT
> > 
> >   Modified files:
> >     sys/ufs/ufs          ufs_dirhash.c 
> >   Log:
> >   Default  to not  performing ufs_dirhash's  extensive directory-block
> >   sanity  check   after  every  directory  modification.   This  check
> >   can   be   re-enabled   at   any  time   by   setting   the   sysctl
> >   "vfs.ufs.dirhash_docheck" to 1.
> 
> My feeling is, the ufs.dirhash_X  would be better named as ufs.dirhash.X
> -- some day we may have a nice GUI for browsing this things, and it will
> present the hierarchy based on dots :) (It will also need to know, which
> settings are modifiable, but that's another story).

Agreed, it should be sort of tree like even though it is MIB.

-- 
-Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
 start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
                           http://www.morons.org/rants/gpl-harmful.php3

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011026113938.D15052>