Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:46:16 -0500 From: Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> To: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Phoronix Benchmarks: Waht's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0? Message-ID: <20091130094616.68a60c0d.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <19219.55350.599595.807654@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <4B13869D.1080907@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <0D3A9408-84A8-4C74-A318-F580B41FC1A6@exscape.org> <hf0h0p$lm4$1@ger.gmane.org> <20091130084704.2893cc85.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <19219.55350.599595.807654@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In response to Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com>: > > Bill Moran writes: > > > It's common knowledge that the default value for vfs.read_max is > > non- optimal for most hardware and that significant performance > > improvements can be made in most cases by raising it. > > Documentation/discussion where? http://www.google.com/search?q=freebsd+vfs.read_max ... although it doesn't seem to be "officially" documented anywhere. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091130094616.68a60c0d.wmoran>