From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 5 09:00:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1483B37B404 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 09:00:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AEA743FCB for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 09:00:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h55G0TUp053465 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 09:00:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h55G0TtA053464; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 09:00:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 09:00:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200306051600.h55G0TtA053464@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Stefan `Sec` Zehl Subject: Re: ports/52511: update of postfix-current port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Stefan `Sec` Zehl List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 16:00:30 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/52511; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Stefan `Sec` Zehl To: Vivek Khera , freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Ben Rosengart Cc: Subject: Re: ports/52511: update of postfix-current port Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 17:56:24 +0200 I got pointed to this PR, as I independently updated the postfix-current port. The last mail in this PR speaks of an attached patchset which is missing (at least from the web interface). The latest patchest in the PR is missing a few things, namely an updated scripts/configure.postfix (the patchnames are different for the experimental releases) and the MD5sums in the distinfo file. I can send a patch for these, if needed. In any case, I hope this is going to be completed and committed soon :) CU, Sec -- A bureaucracy is like a computer program. Usually, the question is how to arrange it so that what you want is composed of operations that the bureaucracy supports. In addition, in any bureaucracy, there is always *someone* whose job is to approve violations of the rules.