From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 21 01:55:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9B0106564A for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2009 01:55:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f171.google.com (mail-ew0-f171.google.com [209.85.219.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5665C8FC13 for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2009 01:55:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so829814ewy.43 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:55:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PGi6A1ZRBwMSIiV/6jmOV/DsAafOvlj7uAOroFW5AGw=; b=q4EuqpDG4nKA/Dp7TTUls4KTyGP6E2TB2PT6t4w53cRbF7P4ZRxxFz8EQnsA1uCQFf nrnYZv63nKSlJfsEyikTv9el0h7vGYKqjhv5lawqsme5h3/5e3oDbadqLgJ8DAcM8Q/o XINzckCg7CKaJkQBKj4BroVDiTijv9CY/eKLY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=X4JWbXwionfIOCv7t5itXHq7GzvT5TlcdU132fXbZEb7JWp46FZkCc0Rs7MoI/gsXq +pOoLYLeOZRyzPZrXOmaTpQIuarw4CPFVHpgl5kApZtcN1bcbBrPPTxGbX/uxEKtxDPE +uwm/1HVMDl/nEVr/Kr/k2Ek6mZdPH5K7FYO8= Received: by 10.210.16.10 with SMTP id 10mr1529744ebp.35.1237600552308; Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:55:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 28sm2935278eye.34.2009.03.20.18.55.51 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:55:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 01:55:49 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090321015549.18863f97@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20090321015316.87f9531b.ghirai@ghirai.com> References: <20090321015316.87f9531b.ghirai@ghirai.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.14.7; i386-portbld-freebsd7.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: speed in extracting rar files - unrar vs. 7z X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 01:55:54 -0000 On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 01:53:16 +0200 Ghirai wrote: > The shareware WinRAR on windows seems to be better implemented (?), as > it uses both cores to the fullest, and as such the time needed to > extract stuff is a lot shorter. IIRC the unix version is portable C, but winrar has a lot of CPU specific optimizations.