Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 10:28:00 +0100 From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> To: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org>, "David E. O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc amd.map Message-ID: <200205161028.00314.dfr@nlsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <200205152229.g4FMTeFl002012@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> References: <200205152229.g4FMTeFl002012@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 15 May 2002 11:29 pm, Brian Somers wrote: > > obrien 2002/05/15 15:24:29 PDT > > > > Modified files: > > etc amd.map > > Log: > > Time to enter modern age and default to NFS version 3. > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.9 +2 -2 src/etc/amd.map > > I was under the impression that NFSv2 was more stable. If so, is > this a good idea ? I don't think there is any difference in stability. There is certainly a = big=20 difference in speed. --=20 Doug Rabson=09=09=09=09Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com =09=09=09=09=09Phone: +44 20 8348 6160 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200205161028.00314.dfr>