Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 15 Jun 2008 16:12:49 -0600
From:      Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Flashplugin
Message-ID:  <20080615221249.GA86486@kokopelli.hydra>
In-Reply-To: <11167f520806080234u2b9e29b0l13c513d783ccadaa@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <200806071500.28001.derek.graham@att.net> <20080608000350.00006173@westmark> <20080608021633.GA6799@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <200806080420.31427.gnemmi@gmail.com> <11167f520806080234u2b9e29b0l13c513d783ccadaa@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 04:34:17AM -0500, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> for what it is worth, between 3 companies that I do consulting for, there
> are about 250 workstations that currently use, Windows ME, or Windows
> 2000.Flash and Microsoft Outlook remain the only 2 reasons we can not use
> PC-BSD. Wine is making some GREAT Progress, and very shortly if not alrea=
dy,
> Outlook will run in wine, and the lack of a current flash player will rem=
ain
> the only thing standing in the way of 250 more PC-BSD stations.

Unfortunately, I don't think Adobe is likely to give a damn about people
who would switch to FreeBSD (or FreeBSD spin-off like PC-BSD) if there
were a current, stable Flash player for the platform.  All Adobe's likely
to care about is people who use FreeBSD (or a spin-off) regardless of
whether there's a current, stable Flash player available.  Adobe wants
market penetration -- which it's just as happy to get by people being
"stuck" on MS Windows as by any other means.

So . . . if you want your situation to provide some kind of influence on
Adobe to provide current, stable Flash players for FreeBSD and its
spin-offs, you need to come up with numbers of FreeBSD-based desktop
systems, not a number of systems running a platform Adobe already
supports that *isn't* FreeBSD-based, no matter how much you'd like to
change those systems to PC-BSD.

--=20
Chad Perrin [ content licensed PDL: http://pdl.apotheon.org ]
awj @reddit: "The terms never and always are never always true."

--EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkhVk+EACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKX1LACgoz2nGnLRU3jbkK7Y9sretKGy
j9AAoJ/IGydYydhAcXhX8MCp4wDwJ2Hb
=sdT6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080615221249.GA86486>