Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 00:48:37 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> To: Alexander Botero-Lowry <alex@complete-systems.net> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/84561: XMMS2 needs a Port! Message-ID: <20050805004837.5b94c583@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <200508042140.j74LeLkI044049@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200508042140.j74LeLkI044049@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 21:40:21 GMT Alexander Botero-Lowry <alex@complete-systems.net> wrote: > The following reply was made to PR ports/84561; it has been noted by > GNATS. > > From: Alexander Botero-Lowry <alex@complete-systems.net> > To: bug-followup@freebsd.org > Cc: > Subject: Re: ports/84561: XMMS2 needs a Port! > Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 14:31:05 -0700 > > --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > > I fixed all the portlint -A bugs that were actually bugs. I'm left > with 4, one of which is fatal. > FATAL: Makefile: PORTVERSION looks illegal. You should modify > "0.1DR2". > I can't help the version naming habits of the XMMS2 developers. What does DR2 stands for ? Maybe you can find an equivalent. > The > other three are possible direct use of command...but two of them are > for the EXCLUDE I pass to scons and one is to tell scons to > install... Yes, I saw that; portlint is overzealous sometimes. > Apologies for the address change the account I set as the > follow up can't send mail to @freebsd.org. This is no problem. > The shar is attached it can also be downloaded at > http://www.stampede.org/~drax/xmms2-fbsd-port.shar if the attachment > doesn't work. It doesn't. I'll test the new version in a few minutes. -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050805004837.5b94c583>