Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Feb 2001 13:33:58 -0500 (EST)
From:      Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>
Cc:        Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, josb@cncdsl.com, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: DJBDNS vs. BIND
Message-ID:  <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1010219133309.56503a-100000@fledge.watson.org>
In-Reply-To: <200102191829.f1JIT6l37371@earth.backplane.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Matt Dillon wrote:

> :> cached state data is inherently bad everywhere, not just in DNS
> :> servers.
> :> 
> :
> :You scare me, I was thinking just the same thing about mountd
> :earlier today.  Only problem is that it violates POLA(* heh), one
> :could offer an command line option to have it watch the file.
> 
>     I was thinking just having a 'mountd -reload'.  I don't like the 
>     idea of programs polling configuration files.  I actually used a
>     similar mechanism in Diablo and wound up having to add hacks to,
>     for example, try to avoid catching a configuration file in the middle
>     of being written out by an editor.

Yeah -- automatic rereading of configuration files worries me also.  You
can end up with races during a file-rewrite.

Robert N M Watson             FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project
robert@fledge.watson.org      NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1010219133309.56503a-100000>