From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 24 08:52:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D5DE16A420; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 08:52:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (it.buh.tecnik93.com [81.196.204.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A9443D5E; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 08:52:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0A52BAF2; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:52:12 +0200 (EET) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:52:10 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Message-ID: <20060124105210.50f869ca@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <20060124084217.GA15831@soaustin.net> References: <200601232113.k0NLDkGY094987@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060124094001.74028070@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20060124084217.GA15831@soaustin.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.8.10; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Mark Linimon , ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/misc/fortune-mod-culmea-culmilor Makefile.fortune X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 08:52:16 -0000 On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 02:42:17 -0600 linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 09:40:01AM +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > It would be nice if maintainers would receive a copy of the commit > > mail for their ports for un-approved commits. Maybe we could help > > more this way. > > In this case, the situation was to relieve an edge condition that was > in conjuction with the bsd.*.mk upgrade. There really wasn't time to > ask people first. There were a number of overlapping regressions that > we had to fix quickly. Normally I'm reluctant to do these kinds of > commits, otherwise. I'm not protesting the commit, you did indeed had a lot of work done in a very short time. > The best way for maintainers to find out when these checkins occur is > to subscribe to FreshPorts and add their ports to the watch-list. Forgot bout fresh ports, thanks. Right now I put my sylpheed-claws to color in red any commit mail that has the name of any my ports in the subject line, but this doesn't work if the commit is done over a lot of ports. -- IOnut - Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" Genius doesn't work on an assembly line basis. You can't simply say, "Today I will be brilliant." -- Kirk, "The Ultimate Computer", stardate 4731.3