Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 11:48:03 -0800 From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) To: Outback Dingo <outbackdingo@gmail.com> Cc: "Mike." <the.lists@mgm51.com>, FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? Message-ID: <861v3rzgcs.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimtvjT4K8ATX22-DQQX6-iJNc9fc4-FmMm5x3EM@mail.gmail.com> (Outback Dingo's message of "Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:31:06 -0500") References: <4D48197A.8000108@gmail.com> <20110201102301.2ae55810@scorpio> <201102011326580606.004CE418@sentry.24cl.com> <AANLkTimtvjT4K8ATX22-DQQX6-iJNc9fc4-FmMm5x3EM@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "Outback" == Outback Dingo <outbackdingo@gmail.com> writes: >> |"Postfix" is actively maintained and is constantly being upgraded by >> |its author. Its mail forum is robust and Postfix has outstanding >> |documentation; perhaps the best of any software available in the FOSS >> |world. >> ============= >> >> >> It is a good thing I read all the replies before I posted mine, as your >> reply is almost word-for-word identical to what I was going to say. :) Outback> yeah... what he said... !!! :) +1 :) No, seriously... I was using sendmail before discovering postfix, and pretty darn good at m4. Or is that m4()dnl()? :) But I've never found postfix without a knob to do something I want it to do, and most of the knobs are set properly right out of the box. (And reasonably named too!) -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>; Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?861v3rzgcs.fsf>