Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 08 Sep 2005 16:07:26 -0700
From:      Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To:        "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        cvs-src@freebsd.org, glebius@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/pccbb pccbb.c
Message-ID:  <4320C42E.8020900@root.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050908.160715.127179498.imp@bsdimp.com>
References:  <20050908194607.GL53891@cell.sick.ru>	<20050908.140057.84363209.imp@bsdimp.com>	<4320ABA9.9010802@root.org> <20050908.160715.127179498.imp@bsdimp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <4320ABA9.9010802@root.org>
>             Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> writes:
> : BTW, there have been very few suspend/resume problems attributable to 
> : our ACPI or APM code.  Almost all are in individual device drivers 
> : (especially video) or bus (PCI until it got config register save support 
> : although type 2 device support is still incomplete I think).
> 
> Type 2 device support is handled by cbb, and is complete as far as I
> can tell.

I think I meant type 1, bridges.

> : Currently, 
> : many systems hang if APIC support is included in the kernel but work 
> : without it.  The rest of the bugs are usually individual BIOS problems 
> : that are difficult to track without a bus analyzer.
> 
> Yes.  I believe that I suspend correctly, but when I resume, the power
> light comes back on and nothing else happens.  Placing a beep in the
> first line of the resume path results in no beep happening, which
> suggests suspend didn't suspend quite correctly.  This happens even
> when all I have in my configured device list is ata. :-(  I'm somewhat
> frustrated by this turn of events, as you can well imagine :-).

Try removing device apic.

-- 
Nate



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4320C42E.8020900>