From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Mar 11 08:09:38 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id IAA18130 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 11 Mar 1996 08:09:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from research.att.com (ns.research.att.com [192.20.225.4]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA18119 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 1996 08:09:34 -0800 (PST) From: jwb@ulysses.att.com Message-Id: <199603111609.IAA18119@freefall.freebsd.org> Received: from ulysses.att.com by ns; Mon Mar 11 11:05:24 EST 1996 Received: from akiva.homer.att.com [135.3.23.77] by hera; Mon Mar 11 11:05:35 EST 1996 Received: from localhost.homer.att.com [127.0.0.1] by akiva; Mon Mar 11 11:05:33 EST 1996 X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/8/95 To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: 2.1R and shells Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 11 Mar 96 11:05:29 EST Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi all, I have 2.1R running on two different machines with two different architectures, and I'm trying to get ksh (not pdksh) as the shell working on them, compiling it from the source code. One is a Gatway 4dx2-66v with an EISA bus that was loaded from a download of the Release from ftp.cdrom.com. On this machine ksh seems to be working ok. The other machine is an AT&T Globalist 600 with a PCI bus, and 2.1R was loaded from the cdrom. This is the machine that is giving me problems. If I'm logged on with an account that uses /bin/ksh has the shell and I try to run a tar tzf XXXX, I get a message about: tar: can't exec gzip: not a directory tar: child returned status 4 If I'm using /bin/csh as the shell, it works. Another problem seems to be that the path is not passed to any childern, one symptom of this is when I run startx, it says X not in PATH, yet if i put echo $PATH in startx before the xinit it shows /usr/X11R6/bin in the path. Or If I try and run a make, it says it can't find cc or ld. Anyone have any ideas why it would work on one machine, but not the other? On both machine ksh is compiled as a static, and both systems are "release setup" i.e. no major hacking/redesign, the gateway kernel has been recompiled to handle the ethernet card and the Globalist to handle the busmouse. Thanks for any assistance. Jim Ballantine jwb@ulysses.att.com