From owner-freebsd-ipfw Tue Apr 10 16:31:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [216.33.66.196]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2936937B422; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 16:31:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billf@elvis.mu.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1098) id D1F9281D01; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 18:31:54 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 18:31:54 -0500 From: Bill Fumerola To: Marko Cuk Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NATd & high internal load - help Message-ID: <20010410183154.H75584@elvis.mu.org> References: <3AD2DB66.FA4A4F75@cuk.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3AD2DB66.FA4A4F75@cuk.nu>; from cuk@cuk.nu on Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 12:07:34PM +0200 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.3-FEARSOME-20010328 i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 12:07:34PM +0200, Marko Cuk wrote: > > I have also 84 ipfw rules for firewall ( most of them reset and deny and > a few dummynet pipes ). > Is the processor too slow for that ? Depending on the order of these rules: possibly. -- Bill Fumerola - security yahoo / Yahoo! inc. - fumerola@yahoo-inc.com / billf@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message