Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 1 Aug 2007 07:13:20 +0300
From:      Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
To:        Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr>
Cc:        freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: On schedulers
Message-ID:  <20070801041320.GH2262@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
In-Reply-To: <f8o49l$sd1$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:  <f8o49l$sd1$1@sea.gmane.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--/9ZOS6odDaRI+0hI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 09:58:38PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> I've just stumbled on the LKML (via Slashdot) discussion on schedulers,
> nicely compiled here: http://kerneltrap.org/node/14023 . I don't think
> 3D performance is of concern for FreeBSD, but I'm wondering how would
Why do you think so ? 3D on FreeBSD is quite important for some of the
users, mine in particular.
> ULE and the latest incarnation of 4BSD fare in that discussion?

--/9ZOS6odDaRI+0hI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFGsAhfC3+MBN1Mb4gRAgNnAKCljFi0xmIGN0WPmwrMkpbFzqawEACeNUnb
2Ri8YmmYlbXh7Cf+qrrvcIE=
=kkC0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--/9ZOS6odDaRI+0hI--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070801041320.GH2262>