From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Feb  6 02:15:01 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE8B16A4CE
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Fri,  6 Feb 2004 02:15:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ns.tern.ru (mail.tern.ru [195.210.170.2])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DAF743D54
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Fri,  6 Feb 2004 02:14:59 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from freebsd@tern.ru)
Received: from mail.tern.ru (mail.tern.ru [192.168.1.140])
	by ns.tern.ru (X/X) with ESMTP id i16AG7Yj077208
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Fri, 6 Feb 2004 13:16:07 +0300
X-Spam-Filter: check_local@ns.tern.ru by digitalanswers.org
Received: from mail.tern.ru (localhost.tern.ru [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.tern.ru (X/X) with ESMTP id i16AHUH6011930
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org.VIRCHECK>;
	Fri, 6 Feb 2004 13:17:31 +0300 (MSK)
Received: (from root@localhost)
	by mail.tern.ru (X/X) id i16AHUlW011929
	for freebsd-security@freebsd.org.VIRCHECK;
	Fri, 6 Feb 2004 13:17:30 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from snork.tern.ru (snork.tern.ru [192.168.1.133])
	by mail.tern.ru (X/X) with ESMTP id i16AHUH6011921
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 6 Feb 2004 13:17:30 +0300 (MSK)
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 13:17:06 +0300
From: freebsd@tern.ru
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <614479869.20040206131706@tern.ru>
To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: ipfw question
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Alex <tmp@tern.ru>
List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting]
	<freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>,
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>,
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 10:15:01 -0000

Dear All.

I want to use 'not' for 2 addresses (for both) in ipfw2 rule.
The only way that looks like what I need is

# ipfw add count from IP1 to not IP2,IP3

But does this rule indeed makes what I want? Does it count all
packets destined to addresses other then IP2 AND IP3?!

No other syntax works.
For example more logically correct
not IP2 AND not IP3
or even
not { IP2 or IP3 }
are understood by ipfw2

man does not contain the good description of this

Can somebody clear this up for me?