From owner-cvs-all Fri Sep 14 5:47:55 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (leviathan.inethouston.net [66.64.12.249]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7890C37B403; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 05:47:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6BB2D10F45A; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 07:47:49 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 07:47:49 -0500 From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: Josef Karthauser Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/postfix Makefile ports/mail/postfix/files patch-aj Message-ID: <20010914074749.A52452@leviathan.inethouston.net> Reply-To: "David W. Chapman Jr." Mail-Followup-To: Josef Karthauser , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org References: <200109140322.f8E3M8O68957@freefall.freebsd.org> <86k7z230rg.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> <20010914125250.B3913@tao.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010914125250.B3913@tao.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.4-RC i386 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 12:52:50PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 12:32:51PM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote: > > At Thu, 13 Sep 2001 20:22:08 -0700 (PDT), > > David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: > > > dwcjr 2001/09/13 20:22:08 PDT > > > > > > Modified files: > > > mail/postfix Makefile > > > mail/postfix/files patch-aj > > > Log: > > > Fix path on main.cf in reference to prefix > > > Bump PORTREVISION > > > > > > PR: 30547 > > > Submitted by: hanahara@meiko.co.jp > > > > I don't think you needed to bump PORTREVISION, since it was just a > > typo rather than a bug, and it doesn't require the users to upgrade > > the port if they configure postfix correctly. > > > > Besides, that line doesn't affect anything at all, it seems. :) > > Please don't bump the PORTREVISION unnecessarily. Every bump suggests > to thousands of users that they need to upgrade. That's a lot of wasted > man-hours if it's not necessary. > I understand the wasted man hours, but how else are you supposed to get the packages to be recreated without a version bump. I thought PORTREVISION was exactly for that reason, recreating the packages, not for much else? -- David W. Chapman Jr. dwcjr@inethouston.net Raintree Network Services, Inc. dwcjr@freebsd.org FreeBSD Committer To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message