Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:56:53 +0100
From:      Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
To:        Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com>
Cc:        emulation@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: linuxolator: fatal trap 12 when compiling libX11
Message-ID:  <20070119095653.c9mwdda84wsk008o@webmail.leidinger.net>
In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0701182352n43071a18yd015ba1ace41fff@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20070116080015.8dus0vamssso0sww@webmail.leidinger.net> <20070116181839.GA80994@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <790a9fff0701161317q74b28955jf61b6e9651168a36@mail.gmail.com> <20070116221150.GA9429@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <790a9fff0701162000s5f48d51fk2e5a4a74bd7021f9@mail.gmail.com> <20070117091530.GA48578@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <790a9fff0701170955o5674c8feu98117320a72e63ef@mail.gmail.com> <20070117223025.GA21199@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <790a9fff0701172317k6876ad77p1c29ac76fa400d65@mail.gmail.com> <20070118084836.GA59381@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <790a9fff0701182352n43071a18yd015ba1ace41fff@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com> (from Fri, 19 Jan 2007 =20
01:52:21 -0600):

> On 1/18/07, Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> wrote:
>>> kernel.  Currently, I'm runing 'emerge azureus', and is currently at
>>> 18 of 188 ports.  It usually paniced on the first or second port.
>>>
>>> So it looks like the problem may be solved by P4 Change 113083.
>>
>> hehe... nice things happen :) I really didnt expect this to help
>> but it did :)
>>
> The problem is fixed with this change, as it built 181 of the 188
> ports.  The only port it can't finish building is dbus (remaining
> ports have a dependancy on dbus), but at least it no longer panics the
> kernel.

Roman, would wyou please give him the most recent races-fix patch to =20
test it? Scot, would you please test to compile some emerge packages =20
with it? I don't expect it to fix the dbus problem. The main =20
motivation is to know if this new changes introduces a visible =20
regression or not.

> Started bus pid 58623 at
> unix:path=3D/tmp/dbus-N3npYJ4n1g,guid=3D6366b045035d377a786f9a79f1f2e000
> Running ./dbus-send --print-reply=3Dliteral --dest=3Dorg.freedesktop.DBus
> /org/freedesktop/DBus org.freedesktop.DBus.Introspectable.Introspect
> Failed to open connection to session message bus: No reply within
> specified time
> killing message bus 58623
> ./run-with-tmp-session-bus.sh: script "./dbus-send" failed
> gmake[2]: *** [dbus-bus-introspect.xml] Error 1

> Looks like dbus-send is not getting any response thru a socket
> (/tmp/dbus-N3npYJ4n1g)  that dbus-launch is using to communicate with
> it.

First of all: we have a problem in FreeBSD regaring sending zero-size =20
data over sockets. Andre is working on fixing this. This may a be the =20
cause, or it may not be the cause. I don't think it is the cause.

We have some other problems as indicated in the LTP tests. So I will =20
be not surprised if there's something else we have to take care of.

Do you have time/energy to try the network tests in the LTP? You have =20
to setup a second box which gives access to a second linux instance =20
with the LTP stuff (can maybe done with a jail which starts a linux =20
remote access daemon).

Bye,
Alexander.

--=20
A pipe gives a wise man time to think
and a fool something to stick in his mouth.

http://www.Leidinger.net    Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org       netchild @ FreeBSD.org  : PGP ID =3D 72077137



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070119095653.c9mwdda84wsk008o>