From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Oct 8 21:34:13 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB03410CC9AC for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 21:34:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pete@nomadlogic.org) Received: from mail.nomadlogic.org (mail.nomadlogic.org [140.82.23.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nomadlogic.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F4107F4E0; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 21:34:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pete@nomadlogic.org) Received: from [192.168.1.203] (cpe-76-175-75-27.socal.res.rr.com [76.175.75.27]) by mail.nomadlogic.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 61f4a6a6 TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 14:34:12 -0700 (PDT) Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3a_Dependencies_=e2=80=93_drm-kmod=2c_drm-stable-kmod_?= =?UTF-8?Q?and_drm-next-kmod?= To: Graham Perrin , Niclas Zeising Cc: FreeBSD Current References: <84ea1230-d6c5-cc0a-a179-8da545790939@gmail.com> From: Pete Wright Message-ID: Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 14:34:11 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <84ea1230-d6c5-cc0a-a179-8da545790939@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2018 21:34:13 -0000 On 10/7/18 11:11 PM, Graham Perrin wrote: > On 07/10/2018 14:03, Niclas Zeising wrote: > >>> … >>> $ pkg rquery %rn graphics/drm-next-kmod >>> drm-kmod >>> drm-kmod >>> $ >>> >>> – is there _truly_ intended to be some dependency between drm-next-kmod and drm-kmod? >> Hi! >> >> The version of drm-*-kmod that's pulled in is dependent on your FreeBSD version.  … > OK, I wasn't aware of that. > > For me at this time: > > - post-installation of drm-next-kmod, the presence of drm-kmod is pretty much a show-stopper > > – better to be without drm-kmod, leaving drm-next-kmod in isolation. I'd like to await Pete Wright's response to before sharing details. here ya go (i'm running drm-devel on a kabylake system in this instance): $ uname -v ; pkg query '%n %v %R' drm-kmod ; pkg query '%n %v %R' drm-devel-kmod FreeBSD 12.0-ALPHA8 #1 b4764e4a0ec(master)-dirty: Thu Oct  4 11:50:08 PDT 2018 pete@duke:/usr/obj/usr/home/pete/git/freebsd/amd64.amd64/sys/GENERIC drm-devel-kmod 4.16.g20180927 unknown-repository i am not installing the drm-kmod port on my end, sorry if i mentioned i was earlier i was probably mixed up there. cheers, -pete -- Pete Wright pete@nomadlogic.org @nomadlogicLA