From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 8 21:54:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D84316A469 for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2007 21:54:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6884513C447 for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2007 21:54:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 16604 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2007 21:54:34 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 Jul 2007 21:54:33 -0000 Received: from Lowell-Desk.lan (Lowell-Desk.lan [172.30.250.6]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D27C02842D for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2007 17:54:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: by Lowell-Desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 2F3561CC5F; Sun, 8 Jul 2007 17:54:28 -0400 (EDT) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <469056DE.40902@tundraware.com> <46908257.8060209@tundraware.com> <44hcof9dkm.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> <46910EDC.10901@tundraware.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 17:54:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <46910EDC.10901@tundraware.com> (Tim Daneliuk's message of "Sun\, 08 Jul 2007 11\:20\:44 -0500") Message-ID: <44644upnmz.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.99 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Enabling A Serial Port On 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 21:54:34 -0000 Tim Daneliuk writes: > I suspect that there are a great > many places - shell scripts and C source code leap to mind - where the > lack of a terminating newline at the end of a file does not cause the > line to be ignored altogether. In both of those cases, the relevant standards say that such input is invalid.