From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 23 22:04:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BBCE16A4CE; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 22:04:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F103A43D41; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 22:04:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1NM4MxD033532; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 14:04:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j1NM4K54033529; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 14:04:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 14:04:20 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: John Baldwin Message-ID: <20050223220420.GB32679@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200502230110.j1N1ASPc000377@repoman.freebsd.org> <5d57b42a8a213bc79d51115a04f3fc1f@xcllnt.net> <20050223081903.GA7858@dragon.nuxi.com> <200502231310.12153.jhb@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200502231310.12153.jhb@FreeBSD.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i cc: Tom Rhodes cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Marcel Moolenaar Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/examples/etc make.conf X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 22:04:23 -0000 On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 01:10:12PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday 23 February 2005 03:19 am, David O'Brien wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 06:04:43PM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > > > Log: > > > > Add 'nocona' to the list of Intel ia64 CPUs and k8 to the AMD CPUs. > > > > > > Nocona is not an ia64 processor. It's a xeon (=ia32) processor with > > > EM64T. > > > > It isn't "with EM64T". Or was the i386 an "80286 with registers" as > > something special? A Nocona is a 64-bit Xeon. > > Actually, a 386 was a 286 with paging at first. :) A Xeon is certainly an > ia32 processor (esp. when compared to ia64), and just as paging was an > extension to the protected mode already present in the 286, one can think of > long mode as an extension of 386 protected mode with PAE. Yes, and was there a huge marketing compain to call it "286 with Paging Technology"? No. It was simply the "i386". > Take a chill pill, > his e-mail didn't even contain the word "AMD" and you still flew off the > handle. Sorry, didn't realize I needed to see the world "AMD" in an email to be able to respond to an email. It is ridiculous the amount of confusion Intel is causing EM64T users. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)