From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 00:51:01 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B5716A419 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 00:51:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B1D13C428 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 00:51:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b27so1246971fka for ; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:50:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ItnuXjIo/QnPmU3fB0zk2EgijQwzMdoqO+d6jy8sAkkS+6LLlWNV3jL3YmPjDHlFht9Gq/Tp25CBcscWFgCdad5g+C1szRdEdfUDpHimJ4BPCT/HtL0sSuyjgmaZbV1Rva2r/hmFBbNE74cF3FhUzcOtnll5bC0zS1lXOMXf6xQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZxewQYmUBrEvFQgvsAKzL2TmVwgs/AkA6N06BeqYugFnlFTQpyPBGfhPSaDLGPwQFI4TAvwqb62a+nhxBpAeRnYzweD+RwXzr+LIvmtDjSDjBC6xzjCG50gQneMZHoVAabvaba7cM7C0h0vSebD0EC0PPuVzWUcVwww76bThuMY= Received: by 10.82.100.1 with SMTP id x1mr4720176bub.1186275059652; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:50:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.185.5 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 17:50:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 19:50:59 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Damian Vicino" In-Reply-To: <46B4E8D7.4060700@dc.uba.ar> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <46B4E8D7.4060700@dc.uba.ar> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Using Smart-Fail HD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 00:51:01 -0000 On 04/08/07, Damian Vicino wrote: > Hello. > Im Having FBSD running in a P3 with 4.3GB HD, and got 2 extra 80GBs HD > that fails the SMART check. > I did a full HD scan with tools provided by the HD's developers and over > 90% of the HDs are safe. > I want to use those HD for home of the lowrank users, and keep the > critical data in the 4GB HD. > Do u know any pretty safe FS for this kind of unstable hardware, i was > thinking in something with software RAID maybe. > Thanks for any suggestion, im pretty new on FBSD world (and > english-speak world too). > BTW, if the solution can be applied to DFBSD, it will be very nice, > becouse i got another machine P1 runnning it, and all HDs i can get for > it use to have a lot of failures already. It, more or less, depends on the errors. I think, though, that I would use some sort of mirroring, gmirror for FreeBSD. That way, if you lose a drive you can at least fall down somewhat gracefully rather than a panic and no more data. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 02:02:48 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F7D16A418 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 02:02:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7038C13C46A for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 02:02:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) id l7522cMo059889; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 21:02:38 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 21:02:37 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Damian Vicino Message-ID: <20070805020237.GE77822@dan.emsphone.com> References: <46B4E8D7.4060700@dc.uba.ar> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46B4E8D7.4060700@dc.uba.ar> X-OS: FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Using Smart-Fail HD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 02:02:48 -0000 In the last episode (Aug 04), Damian Vicino said: > Im Having FBSD running in a P3 with 4.3GB HD, and got 2 extra 80GBs > HD that fails the SMART check. If those drives fail a SMART check and they are under warranty, send them back for replacement. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 02:41:48 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0357016A418 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 02:41:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jackbarnett@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF9813C428 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 02:41:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jackbarnett@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a73so2122539pye for ; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 19:41:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=gxgturjGmm+5MiLbTf0nv1ugnNmCDIRVxe8kmJxEv0zYsnEjgLkp6fM7MzIsCv2dFpwzIdVzdKA91jIPOqgGmMLoKN0SPe1euwyvVb2B9E09zG73QR+UzuFSXsyeofaFpg1t6J5YBYyqrmarpTkshX5z9UG2r2oF3iECmljr7Jg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=YYoydbezW9+PAy3VFGO0dgqlebXuqTqq7/r2UcF7OgoJLt1QlgHRzlexCgFoDQaNaE/WV0/bvfm/I3m9z2k/iGqqNiYTPX7//GTKTMev2rS80CAZLFT2VWJ6QdVCPxtJTC6WwumXLV34JJzG6A24zyT95eAjx4nX1Xc6GCwL428= Received: by 10.35.111.14 with SMTP id o14mr7459753pym.1186281707139; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 19:41:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.17.10? ( [67.190.229.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 39sm17862130nzk.2007.08.04.19.41.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 04 Aug 2007 19:41:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46B538E8.7060602@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2007 21:41:44 -0500 From: jbarnet User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Freebsd questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Iomega Ditto Max Pro X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jackbarnett@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 02:41:48 -0000 Hello, I have this drive: Iomega Ditto Max (Professional) Model: IO 1000 - PX It has a parallel port interface. Included are a bunch of 5/10 Gig [uncompressed/compressed] tapes and also a few 3.5/7 Gig [uncom/com] tapes. I was wondering if this would be usable under the FreeBSD? Version: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE i386 Thank you kindly. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 02:44:44 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBFD816A419 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 02:44:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nico-freebsd-questions@schottelius.org) Received: from denkbrett.schottelius.org (ch126.ha.eof.name [62.65.155.126]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6800D13C461 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 02:44:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nico-freebsd-questions@schottelius.org) Received: by denkbrett.schottelius.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9477C147112; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 01:57:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 01:57:51 +0200 From: Nico -telmich- Schottelius To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070804235751.GA4010@schottelius.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: echo $message | gpg -e $sender -s | netcat mailhost 25 X-Unix-Info: http://unix.schottelius.org/ X-Netzseite: http://nico.schottelius.org/ X-System-Info: denkbrett running Linux 2.6.22.1-rsbac-denkbrett on i686 Subject: Raid Monitoring: a summary X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 02:44:44 -0000 --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello guys! As we've some Freebsd servers at work and we need to control the status of the raid-systems I started to write a page describing how to monitor the different raid-systems. It cat be found at http://nico.schottelius.org/documentations/freebsd/freebsd-raid-monitoring/ I know that there are some systems missing (at least adaptec), because I just documentated what we've here or what I searched for anyhow. So if you've additional information, please tell me, so I can put them on that page. My aim is to have all supported raid systems documentated, so there's a central documentation available about how to monitor all raid systems. Sincerly Nico --=20 Think about Free and Open Source Software (FOSS). http://nico.schottelius.org/documentations/foss/the-term-foss/ PGP: BFE4 C736 ABE5 406F 8F42 F7CF B8BE F92A 9885 188C --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGtRJ+uL75KpiFGIwRApItAKCPMsR5o+dfhj87YLM3gHjtSKKSngCgtMbv vbK5YZy0qH84nqjWv8GDZB4= =GopH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 02:57:45 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B4A16A419 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 02:57:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786FD13C428 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 02:57:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from localhost (jn@ns1 [69.55.238.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l752vi2r012233; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 22:57:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, jackbarnett@gmail.com Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 22:56:48 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <46B538E8.7060602@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <46B538E8.7060602@gmail.com> X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200708042256.50421.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: Re: Iomega Ditto Max Pro X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 02:57:45 -0000 On Saturday 04 August 2007, jbarnet wrote: > Hello, > > I have this drive: > Iomega Ditto Max (Professional) > Model: IO 1000 - PX > > It has a parallel port interface. > > Included are a bunch of 5/10 Gig [uncompressed/compressed] tapes and > also a few 3.5/7 Gig [uncom/com] tapes. > > I was wondering if this would be usable under the FreeBSD? > > Version: > FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE i386 The vpo(4) manpage does not mention this device, but if it uses the same parallel-to-SCSI interface as one of the other Iomega products listed then it might work. vpo is not part of the default GENERIC kernel so you'd either need to load it as a module or build a custom kernel to include it. You'll also need scbus(4) and sa(4), but they are included in GENERIC. JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 03:23:17 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7021C16A41A for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 03:23:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsdprakash@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E06E13C45A for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 03:23:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsdprakash@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f1so772034rvb for ; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 20:23:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=LHIbjaEwOkDobvqFiMQ1NN3lwrUazTqK0DES2LICOMtW25R21AICVQTGRX+rEmofeVzeKtpQR+ux2bcqmsyEwvw2SCw0E4RcUMuI/NBDFBCxtlHi5hJii0bqnVlyMmgYAKewHEqWnp1hdKuWkTgkQsZm/yFkxUWbyPd3slwXYMw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=VyX5ehgV4gVch9RswoJqSfCb+TuBAAGA2ojz89QZTgys0n+CNIquSBpoptHLeA8xFvSKwq5mNw0spsv4YuM428b47p4qvVUbU752+0wUgwWWDDKxjCeHPcEnkD1Zudgi2J0DumMPR4nNzNkIPSh3p+FIl3kIor47ak3PELb4F1U= Received: by 10.142.231.7 with SMTP id d7mr194646wfh.1186284196799; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 20:23:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.158.2 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 20:23:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1428d0e80708042023k3b5bec4cs4683a92f84d3f521@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 09:08:16 +0545 From: "Prakash Poudyal" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: How to know the size of RAM memory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 03:23:17 -0000 Hello everybody, Can any body tell how to see the size of RAM memory in freebsd. ? Thank you Sincerely Prakash From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 03:54:16 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4FA716A41A for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 03:54:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from apvanderveen@att.net) Received: from mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.117]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2D2513C459 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 03:54:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from apvanderveen@att.net) Received: from t60.mydomain.home (cpe-72-231-141-22.nycap.res.rr.com[72.231.141.22]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc13) with ESMTP id <20070805034357113008v60ve>; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 03:43:58 +0000 Message-ID: <46B5477B.4030001@att.net> Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2007 23:43:55 -0400 From: "Arend P. van der Veen" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070803) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman References: <46AA4CBB.4080605@dwinner.net> <46AA5D1A.5020207@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <46AA5D1A.5020207@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "David J. Neu" , dwinner@dwinner.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: emacs22 and portsdb X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 03:54:17 -0000 Hi, I have been having trouble with emacs22 also. I am using FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p7. I did the upgrade as described in the updating notes. I use emacs plus auctex slime quack emacs-w3m Everything was upgraded properly. However, no portsdb -Uu generates errors. Therefore, I have remove EMACS_PORT_NAME=emacs22 from /etc/make.conf and now portsdb -Uu works without a problem. However, if I remove any of the ports such as auctex and then reinstall it, portinstall will try to install emacs21 again which conflicts with emacs22. I am stuck. If I leave EMACS_PORT_NAME=emacs22 in /etc/make.conf then dependencies work but portsdb -Uu fails. If I remove EMACS_PORT_NAME=emacs22 from /etc/make.conf then portsdb -Uu works but the dependencies are messed up. I even went as far as to delete emacs with pkg_delete -r emacs-22.1 and tried installing everything from scratch. However the dependencies are still messed up. Does anybody have a solution to this problem? Thanks, Arend van der Veen Matthew Seaman wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Duane Winner wrote: > >> We've been having a problem with generating the ports Index ever since >> upgrading to emacs22. >> >> As per /usr/ports/UPDATING, we added EMACS_PORT_NAME=*emacs22* to >> /etc/make.conf > > Errr --- that should probably read: > > EMACS_PORT_NAME=emacs22 > > You certainly don't need the asterisks there. > > In any case, setting this variable will screw up indexing, because a > number of e-lisp ports will try and append the EMACS_PORT_NAME to > their package origin if it is set. However not all the ports that > do that also have a slave port 'foo-emacs22' hence the problems with > building the INDEX. > > The best answer is don't set EMACS_PORT_NAME in /etc/make.conf -- > emacs22 is the default now anyhow. The INDEX will build just fine, > and the various e-lisp packages seem to work OK as well, so long as > you've reinstall all the e-lisp packages once you've upgraded from > emacs21 to emacs22. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > - -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard > Flat 3 > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate > Kent, CT11 9PW > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFGql0a8Mjk52CukIwRCJkgAJ0fh9qkl4eWFQRwrrG8DIwAOqUmlACeMT19 > 8AWFPYKQdh8Fvko14TCwyxs= > =vZLj > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 04:00:27 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0927316A41A for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 04:00:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modulok@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E848F13C459 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 04:00:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modulok@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f1so773200rvb for ; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 21:00:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Zl24kTIp3KqSRXaEbQrJ2BGD4mIUpvVTJ8lzZOKKgTKv5MptNH/Djdhnh9RHZxNAP8rNXm8OfpiK8jCRCCHL0Dr7G2z34Ll9D1P3hk3EDyQBwc54gugGbyyMsUvkX4QrkfcT/05FTHx/MGqAGG//SZndDvtTyMf6ZPqxGYBr5ys= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IW7CW639vCA4lZlqly8ax0MLVm3U90FAZeNnKMYpzhiPNBw9NawvIK0mRfkUSDmlPoP+13Llvi3zn9r2s3lk8Yf6dSgfD+3naCShKl0Qebc11T6zwETKPMmU9JfeRKZ5PlNRZ+3kZv00ytGYD8eml38v98uVLcaWQ/sSWyHsr/A= Received: by 10.141.63.20 with SMTP id q20mr1258782rvk.1186286426490; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 21:00:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.170.12 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 21:00:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <64c038660708042100jdf7db91qbb92a6c663857627@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 22:00:26 -0600 From: Modulok To: "Prakash Poudyal" In-Reply-To: <1428d0e80708042023k3b5bec4cs4683a92f84d3f521@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1428d0e80708042023k3b5bec4cs4683a92f84d3f521@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to know the size of RAM memory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 04:00:27 -0000 On 8/4/07, Prakash Poudyal wrote: > Hello everybody, > > Can any body tell how to see the size of RAM memory in freebsd. ? > Thank you > > Sincerely > > Prakash It should be displayed early in the dmesg(8) output shown during the boot process. You may review this by executing the dmesg(8) command. Among the output will be listed: dmesg | grep "memory" real memory = 2146304000 (2046 MB) avail memory = 2087034880 (1990 MB) You could also check the appropriate sysctl(8) variables as follows: sysctl hw.physmem sysctl hw.usermem sysctl hw.realmem To get memory usage statistics you can use ps(1) and top(1): ps -u top -Modulok- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 04:10:14 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4C916A419 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 04:10:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@nyi.unixathome.org) Received: from nyi.unixathome.org (nyi.unixathome.org [64.147.113.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F9613C457 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 04:10:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@nyi.unixathome.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nyi.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E101C50886 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 00:10:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at unixathome.org Received: from nyi.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nyi.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bi9jBziP8clm for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 00:10:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nyi.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id F360E50848; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 00:10:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20070805041002.F360E50848@nyi.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 00:10:02 -0400 (EDT) Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2007-07-15 - 2007-08-04 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 04:10:14 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . These are the articles posted during this period: 1-Aug : IBM ThinkPad T41: Upgrading RAM and HDD Things are getting tight and slow... http://freebsddiary.org/ibm-thinkpad-t41-hardware-upgrades.php?2 -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 04:15:57 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D21A16A419 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 04:15:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noc@hdk5.net) Received: from guam10.hdk5.net (guam10.hdk5.net [66.180.132.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61AB213C45A for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 04:15:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noc@hdk5.net) Received: from [192.168.1.29] (unknown [66.180.149.18]) by guam10.hdk5.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4DF5C1F; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 17:44:11 -1000 (HST) Message-ID: <46B5478A.7060609@hdk5.net> Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:44:10 -1000 From: NetOpsCenter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060417 FreeBSD/i386 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Prakash Poudyal , questions@freebsd.org References: <1428d0e80708042023k3b5bec4cs4683a92f84d3f521@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1428d0e80708042023k3b5bec4cs4683a92f84d3f521@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: How to know the size of RAM memory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 04:15:57 -0000 Prakash Poudyal wrote: >Hello everybody, > >Can any body tell how to see the size of RAM memory in freebsd. ? >Thank you > >Sincerely > >Prakash >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > dmesg -a | more This will get you all the stats from boot up. ~Al Plant - Honolulu, Hawaii - Phone: 808-284-2740 + http://hawaiidakine.com + http://freebsdinfo.org + noc@hdk5.net + + http://internetohana.org - Supporting - FreeBSD 6.* - 7.* + "All that's really worth doing is what we do for others."- Lewis Carrol From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 05:13:36 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3DF16A41A for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 05:13:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (pool-71-117-239-216.ptldor.fios.verizon.net [71.117.239.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 555DB13C4D5 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 05:13:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (localhost.home.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l74KwwEk008364 for ; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 13:58:58 -0700 Received: from sopwith.solgatos.com (uucp@localhost) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.4/Submit) with UUCP id l74Kwwr4008361 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 13:58:58 -0700 Received: from localhost by sopwith.solgatos.com (8.8.8/6.24) id UAA25769; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 20:57:03 GMT Message-Id: <200708042057.UAA25769@sopwith.solgatos.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2007 13:57:03 +0100 From: Dieter Subject: Re: USB drives? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 05:13:36 -0000 > Hi, I'm thinking of getting a couple USB drives to use in > backing up my 6.2-RELEASE-p4 system. Any suggestions or > warnings on brands of USB hard drives? If you go the external box route, be sure to get one with reasonable cooling. I have a JM20337 which works fine with FreeBSD 6.2, except for: I haven't found a way to set the mode of a USB disk's write cache. PR usb/113977 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 05:35:58 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E735916A417 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 05:35:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakheshster@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD21513C459 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 05:35:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakheshster@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so897222wxd for ; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 22:35:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:x-x-sender:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:from:sender; b=PqPyiWQiF4LsCvz+rAwO7vvFswIgEptsvh4c4v6VnwoMndauw4Fh1KdUKDfRqB7QmiYin97MD3SxVRGybPTw3CDOl4pxm2otgKgin85X+AzU6g9gv6CmflTxz2RzTa0JUuOK+EtUO+mW5Z6Ig8TPQRk2EDyq91TMd+9swI9/vmI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:date:x-x-sender:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:from:sender; b=Rea74UKwQDZEqirG/yCGvzL2bAnq9auZ5tvoMroSrsgvr5VpPJ/24u+QHTYnWCJ2Z7taQV9ZHnJ5Sj7pwBPEEbi9fMR2XoH2omz7extw3I0cpQxhAPIgFp5zbKjo4Adk9QMubDDEQ8gf0YSsZOENrGZieSLB2dGoT/30d2S5DDA= Received: by 10.70.11.5 with SMTP id 5mr7733719wxk.1186292157749; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 22:35:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.home.rakhesh.com ( [82.178.137.21]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m33sm5551673ele.2007.08.04.22.35.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 04 Aug 2007 22:35:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scrat.home.rakhesh.com (scrat.home.rakhesh.com [192.168.17.31]) by smtp.home.rakhesh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A22211420; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 09:35:32 +0400 (GST) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 09:35:32 +0400 (GST) X-X-Sender: rakhesh@scrat.home.rakhesh.com To: Doug Barton In-Reply-To: <46B0F17C.2010506@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: <20070805091932.B67919@scrat.home.rakhesh.com> References: <499c70c0707260136hea82f27s87dfa53432d0e409@mail.gmail.com> <94c6ae7ae570814564d364bfe9aad8ea@szalbot.homedns.org> <20070801030504.GA3773@bifrost.agrussell.com> <426DE541-FB51-44FF-B7F4-B34E0F9A7861@goldmark.org> <46B0DB5F.4020401@FreeBSD.org> <60BEAECB-C72A-46B3-90D7-F3AB8778605D@goldmark.org> <46B0F17C.2010506@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Rakhesh Sasidharan Sender: Rakhesh Sasidharan Cc: Zbigniew Szalbot , "A.G. Russell IV" , Jeffrey Goldberg , Freebsd questions Subject: Re: Waiting for BIND security announcement X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 05:35:59 -0000 Hi! Was going through this slightly old thread and wanted to clear somethings up for myself. >> >>> If you want to stay as close as possible to 6.2-RELEASE but also >>> include the fixes that the security officer deems important enough to >>> release widely, use the tag RELENG_6_2 (usually in your supfile for >>> cvsup or csup). If you want the latest code for 6-stable, which will >>> eventually become 6.3-RELEASE, use just RELENG_6. I use 'freebsd-update' to keep my 6.2 installation up-to-date. So that means I would be following the RELENG_6_2 tag, right? > In addition to security issues, the ports give you a greater degree of > flexibility in how BIND is configured. If you're going to be offering > a public name server (and by that I hope you mean authoritative, not > recursive) on 6-stable you're probably better off using 9.4.x anyway, > with the threading option disabled. > >> Are there other things in /usr/src/contrib that follow this pattern? > > Sure, lots. Too many for me to list without having to think hard about > it and potentially leave something out. This has probably been asked before, but if BIND is available in ports then why is it also available in contrib? Are there any benefits in choosing the one in contrib over the one in ports? Regards, Rakhesh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 05:13:36 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D49F16A419 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 05:13:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (pool-71-117-239-216.ptldor.fios.verizon.net [71.117.239.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A0013C4D3 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 05:13:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (localhost.home.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l74NcVtV009250 for ; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 16:38:31 -0700 Received: from sopwith.solgatos.com (uucp@localhost) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.4/Submit) with UUCP id l74NcVLf009247 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 16:38:31 -0700 Received: from localhost by sopwith.solgatos.com (8.8.8/6.24) id XAA04646; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 23:04:00 GMT Message-Id: <200708042304.XAA04646@sopwith.solgatos.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2007 16:04:00 +0100 From: Dieter X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 06:43:43 +0000 Subject: Re: 6.2 not compatible with new sata drives ?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 05:13:36 -0000 > I got 2 new 160GB drives last month, and my system has been > unstable ever since. I have swapped cables, purchased a > brand-new sata150 controller (as opposed to the year old > sataII), and the results are always the same. What make & model controllers? What make & model drives? Some combinations of controller and drive do not play well together. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 06:49:10 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEEAD16A418 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 06:49:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5ED613C465 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 06:49:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l756mxV0013821; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 08:48:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id l756mwdb013818; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 08:48:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 08:48:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Paul Hoffman In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20070805084850.N13728@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Creating an ext2 file system on FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 06:49:11 -0000 /usr/ports/sysutils/e2fsprogs On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, Paul Hoffman wrote: > Hi again. Is there a FreeBSD equivalent of Linux's 'mke2fs'? I want to create > a disk image that is in ext2 format. On Linux, I would do: > dd if=/dev/zero of=some.img bs=1M count=1 seek=1024 > /sbin/mke2fs -F -j some.img > Can I do something similar on FreeBSD? > > --Paul Hoffman > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 06:49:42 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CB716A417 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 06:49:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4417513C48A for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 06:49:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l756naYv016528; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 08:49:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id l756naBY016496; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 08:49:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 08:49:36 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Prakash Poudyal In-Reply-To: <1428d0e80708042023k3b5bec4cs4683a92f84d3f521@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20070805084918.R13728@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <1428d0e80708042023k3b5bec4cs4683a92f84d3f521@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to know the size of RAM memory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 06:49:42 -0000 dmesg |grep memory On Sun, 5 Aug 2007, Prakash Poudyal wrote: > Hello everybody, > > Can any body tell how to see the size of RAM memory in freebsd. ? > Thank you > > Sincerely > > Prakash > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 06:50:54 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 431E016A41A for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 06:50:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F31813C48A for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 06:50:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l756onjH021795; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 08:50:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id l756ogOr021640; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 08:50:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 08:50:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Dieter In-Reply-To: <200708042304.XAA04646@sopwith.solgatos.com> Message-ID: <20070805085018.A13728@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <200708042304.XAA04646@sopwith.solgatos.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.2 not compatible with new sata drives ?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 06:50:54 -0000 bought month ago ad4: 305245MB at ata2-master SATA150 on amd64 server - no problems On Sat, 4 Aug 2007, Dieter wrote: >> I got 2 new 160GB drives last month, and my system has been >> unstable ever since. I have swapped cables, purchased a >> brand-new sata150 controller (as opposed to the year old >> sataII), and the results are always the same. > > What make & model controllers? What make & model drives? > Some combinations of controller and drive do not play well > together. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 07:18:23 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3511416A418 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 07:18:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shantanoo@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2D513C458 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 07:18:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shantanoo@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f1so778624rvb for ; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 00:18:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=krg+OW070NaEozqaJBaPhCU+K01YpRZdOGDASJQQWU6WIXK4tuFsy+O/sjZK23xxKvgw3Hg6SE+1h44FFxejJdIiuE4WEhPwFxUxiqDBjV32VSajDeMC22RnjYa8n6FLa9WpbJWzbb1hi/qWqaz4v+rFIQ/7csTZTcbTTddrwWg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=AZdbXujRrF+NasU3O2bZx4EaG4/iDvslCY942RVjov5vqDPyvEJGMo4GKkzDy1+WHwk4i4EyWVW+Ac6Alcem3i46cLEToAN64BUcPDl4+0PFiSGbWQPRG1dYcx7gsa9gA5cerfKPbworAbV1Xkb7fVtcKbPJUU6Rlm4k/A2qTos= Received: by 10.141.52.5 with SMTP id e5mr1692856rvk.1186296708956; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 23:51:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.2? ( [121.247.78.27]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c14sm8607657rvf.2007.08.04.23.51.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 04 Aug 2007 23:51:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1428d0e80708042023k3b5bec4cs4683a92f84d3f521@mail.gmail.com> References: <1428d0e80708042023k3b5bec4cs4683a92f84d3f521@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Shantanoo Mahajan Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 12:21:40 +0530 To: Prakash Poudyal X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to know the size of RAM memory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 07:18:23 -0000 On 05-Aug-07, at 8:53 AM, Prakash Poudyal wrote: > Hello everybody, > > Can any body tell how to see the size of RAM memory in freebsd. ? you may try: sysctl -a | grep -i mem shanatnoo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 14:38:51 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E4416A419 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 14:38:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from apvanderveen@att.net) Received: from mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6175213C46B for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 14:38:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from apvanderveen@att.net) Received: from t60.mydomain.home (cpe-72-231-141-22.nycap.res.rr.com[72.231.141.22]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc11) with ESMTP id <20070805143850111002llb5e>; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 14:38:50 +0000 Message-ID: <46B5E0F8.7050405@att.net> Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 10:38:48 -0400 From: "Arend P. van der Veen" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070803) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: portsdb and cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 14:38:51 -0000 Hi, I have recently been having trouble with running portsdb after cvsup. I am running 6.2-RELEASE-p7. The approach that I had been using was: /usr/local/bin/cvsup -L 0 /usr/sup/supfile /usr/local/sbin/portsdb -Uu This had worked great until the emacs22 update. Now portsdb crashes due to the emacs entry in /etc/make.conf. However, I see very little chatter on the lists about this. I have started to wonder if the bulk of the community may be updating their ports differently. Upon some limited research I found that I could use: /usr/local/bin/cvsup -L 0 /usr/sup/supfile /usr/local/sbin/portsdb -Fu This work fine for me. I can then use tools such as pkg_version, pkg_delete, portinstall and portupgrade without any problems. My open ended question is what does the rest of the community do to update their ports collection? Thanks, Arend From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 14:51:27 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C832516A46B for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 14:51:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from pollux.dfwlp.com (rrcs-64-183-212-244.sw.biz.rr.com [64.183.212.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56F013C46E for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 14:51:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from athena.dfwlp.com (athena.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.83]) (authenticated bits=0) by pollux.dfwlp.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l75EpObC025642 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 09:51:24 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) From: Jonathan Horne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 09:51:24 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20070805041002.F360E50848@nyi.unixathome.org> In-Reply-To: <20070805041002.F360E50848@nyi.unixathome.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200708050951.24220.freebsd@dfwlp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on pollux.dfwlp.com Subject: Re: The FreeBSD Diary: 2007-07-15 - 2007-08-04 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 14:51:27 -0000 On Saturday 04 August 2007 23:10:02 Dan Langille wrote: > The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical > examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly > to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people > know what's available on the website. Before you post a question > here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list > archives > and/or The FreeBSD Diary . > > These are the articles posted during this period: > > 1-Aug : IBM ThinkPad T41: Upgrading RAM and HDD > Things are getting tight and slow... > http://freebsddiary.org/ibm-thinkpad-t41-hardware-upgrades.php?2 dan, saw your article. hold tight if you havent bought anything yet... we have a ton of ibm t4x laptops, which are nearing decommission. the ones that are still in service have a minimum of a gig of ram, and some might have more. i know we have a ton of discarded ram modules, and i *might* be able to come up with something that might be worth donating. i will check what we have first thing monday morning, and let you know if im able to send something over. cheers, -- Jonathan Horne http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org freebsd@dfwlp.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 15:00:12 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D193416A417 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 15:00:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from outbackdingo@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4B5E13C465 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 15:00:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from outbackdingo@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so1643809waf for ; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 08:00:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=TcStRlromHGpH02N5fQieacZ2TuN0ksvi1CMt5jj8opXzyC84mdbcDAmN6elX1dfbf38NZzjxHIBeoX/jdrEa6Uc/1mhFiwW5c6ekwOQCs2nu14TGaD/K6+pyaqa5AkL/pAec54xvAr49XlQZuqzLoZAJCiyVL1KUD++9nM2gSc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=mTtSvMMq3gAtnRYI9qCOOy5ozH59i5hGc+mz0i6h5NsdwUI+NjSTgpfTp3Wv+YNY0Y7puUAp8Da2y5uJfnpNk6bWN43IiEW1bJrgfWVP1YSfeMARTf5qDBk26aQ0CuGk6ESLrhnvndpp0if9EdAKCmpERDv1GR1Eprz9ReKqLS0= Received: by 10.114.106.1 with SMTP id e1mr4777060wac.1186326011922; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 08:00:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from z60m.optimlabs.com ( [210.213.197.153]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l37sm5462265waf.2007.08.05.08.00.09 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 05 Aug 2007 08:00:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 18:00:06 +0300 From: OutBackDingo To: Jonathan Horne Message-ID: <20070805180006.083fb477@z60m.optimlabs.com> In-Reply-To: <200708050951.24220.freebsd@dfwlp.com> References: <20070805041002.F360E50848@nyi.unixathome.org> <200708050951.24220.freebsd@dfwlp.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.13; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The FreeBSD Diary: 2007-07-15 - 2007-08-04 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 15:00:12 -0000 Hrmm odd cause my Z60M lenovo said the largest drive i could buy was 120G, but sensing the fact that was only due to specs i opted to buy a 250G SATA i plugged it in and it worked fine. might be the specs were based on drive sizes available at the time ? On Sun, 5 Aug 2007 09:51:24 -0500 Jonathan Horne wrote: > On Saturday 04 August 2007 23:10:02 Dan Langille wrote: > > The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical > > examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly > > to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people > > know what's available on the website. Before you post a question > > here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list > > archives > > and/or The FreeBSD Diary . > > > > These are the articles posted during this period: > > > > 1-Aug : IBM ThinkPad T41: Upgrading RAM and HDD > > Things are getting tight and slow... > > http://freebsddiary.org/ibm-thinkpad-t41-hardware-upgrades.php?2 > > dan, > > saw your article. hold tight if you havent bought anything yet... we > have a ton of ibm t4x laptops, which are nearing decommission. the > ones that are still in service have a minimum of a gig of ram, and > some might have more. i know we have a ton of discarded ram modules, > and i *might* be able to come up with something that might be worth > donating. > > i will check what we have first thing monday morning, and let you > know if im able to send something over. > > cheers, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 14:12:22 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD6F16A421 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 14:12:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gcrazym@yahoo.com) Received: from web36509.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web36509.mail.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.85.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BC03013C4B7 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 14:12:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gcrazym@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 74518 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Aug 2007 13:45:40 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=bDgIxjIU0h2woSX15ufVZPeJXB3qiLIt8BJCiaptsmUY3rSFi4vK3FOBiqY9jzjiHpLWbirW8YeeDd5d4x5i1kCIoErm3taB49Q4ooItFqkapNHMJQ6HWqo8idctCE4x+6AWFUfJkMfwM0lxLvthMzAyTQJwmk/GpLbl6xTecUA=; X-YMail-OSG: nMuY1AQVM1l2gYOWnigSFBlMxAwM3N2svoxs6OIgUQ_3eSql6PTwfvXSTG7.sg0ZDaXn0mbcKAPOBBKp2.kdbMbFcPmE8hj.922Bs5D_Y9HQ.FluM.aazs3MFl7woA-- Received: from [86.108.102.159] by web36509.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 06:45:40 PDT Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 06:45:40 -0700 (PDT) From: "Galya." To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <424139.73619.qm@web36509.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 15:09:42 +0000 Cc: Subject: Cross Compiling X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 14:12:22 -0000 hello, i need if i can make cross compiling for bsdlite while im running freebsd , if there is any kind of help for this , cross compiling , and all about how to make it done plz help me.. /` | \] (| | (| \/ (| / ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 15:49:03 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0413E16A417 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 15:49:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd2@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (Mail-03.name-services.com [64.74.223.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1F3213C45D for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 15:49:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd2@a1poweruser.com) Received: from laptop ([76.190.247.202]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 5 Aug 2007 08:51:49 -0700 From: "fbsd2" To: Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 11:49:02 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Aug 2007 15:51:49.0847 (UTC) FILETIME=[89091670:01C7D778] Subject: RE: How to know the size of RAM memory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd2@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 15:49:03 -0000 I tried what people said to do and I get different values that do not match what the bios say. Why is there so large a difference? How can this be explained??? # /root >sysctl -a | grep -i memory Virtual Memory: (Total: 2871K, Active 91444K) Real Memory: (Total: 37324K Active 12756K) Shared Virtual Memory: (Total: 15088K Active: 9864K) Shared Real Memory: (Total: 3284K Active: 2700K) Free Memory Pages: 20896K # /root >dmesg | grep -i memory real memory = 67108864 (64 MB) avail memory = 56094720 (53 MB) bios show base 640k extended 64512k cache 384k total = 65536k -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Shantanoo Mahajan Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2007 2:52 AM To: Prakash Poudyal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to know the size of RAM memory On 05-Aug-07, at 8:53 AM, Prakash Poudyal wrote: > Hello everybody, > > Can any body tell how to see the size of RAM memory in freebsd. ? you may try: sysctl -a | grep -i mem shanatnoo _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 15:58:36 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A77116A419 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 15:58:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from forget_about_aj@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc1-s27.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc1-s27.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 986B813C469 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 15:58:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from forget_about_aj@hotmail.com) Received: from BAY124-W55 ([207.46.11.218]) by bay0-omc1-s27.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Sun, 5 Aug 2007 08:46:37 -0700 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [86.108.102.159] From: Ahmad Hamad To: Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 15:46:36 +0000 Importance: Normal Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Aug 2007 15:46:37.0243 (UTC) FILETIME=[CEB580B0:01C7D777] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 16:18:20 +0000 Subject: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 15:58:36 -0000 Hello,=20 I'm trying to compile 4.4BSD-lite under FreeBSD 6.2, and I'm trying to comp= ile gcc-2.3 that comes with 4.4BSD-lite so I have to make a cross compiling= , but Unluckily I couldn't find any cross-linker or cross-assembler to run = under FreeBSD So I tried to compile Binutils for that but when I compile bi= nutils I got compilation errors, when I searched about it I found that binu= tils that's incompatible with FreeBSD,my question is is there any cross-lin= ker or cross-assembler or binutils dedicated for FreBSD. Thanks _________________________________________________________________ Feel like a local wherever you go with BackOfMyHand.com http://www.backofmyhand.com= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 16:49:30 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EADAD16A419 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 16:49:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx22.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A9CDA13C46E for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 16:49:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 7739 invoked by uid 399); 5 Aug 2007 16:42:49 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO lap.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTP; 5 Aug 2007 16:42:49 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Message-ID: <46B5FE07.5080004@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 09:42:47 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070803) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rakhesh Sasidharan References: <499c70c0707260136hea82f27s87dfa53432d0e409@mail.gmail.com> <94c6ae7ae570814564d364bfe9aad8ea@szalbot.homedns.org> <20070801030504.GA3773@bifrost.agrussell.com> <426DE541-FB51-44FF-B7F4-B34E0F9A7861@goldmark.org> <46B0DB5F.4020401@FreeBSD.org> <60BEAECB-C72A-46B3-90D7-F3AB8778605D@goldmark.org> <46B0F17C.2010506@FreeBSD.org> <20070805091932.B67919@scrat.home.rakhesh.com> In-Reply-To: <20070805091932.B67919@scrat.home.rakhesh.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Zbigniew Szalbot , "A.G. Russell IV" , Jeffrey Goldberg , Freebsd questions Subject: Re: Waiting for BIND security announcement X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 16:49:31 -0000 Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote: > This has probably been asked before, Heh, no, never. :) > but if BIND is available in ports then why is it also available in > contrib? Couple of reasons, of relatively equal importance depending on who you speak to. BSD systems have "always" (I haven't verified this, but people who should know have told me) shipped with dns stuff on board, so there is resistance to the idea of stripping it out for that reason. The other thing that is a concern to a lot of people is that BIND is more than just named. Take a look at the WITHOUT_BIND* knobs in src.conf(1) in 7-current or make.conf(1) in 6-stable to get an idea of how things break down. I have a standing offer to either remove BIND from the base, or flip the defaults for some of those knobs to "NO" if the community wants it that way. > Are there any benefits in choosing the one in contrib over the one > in ports? Advantage to the one in contrib is that it's right there, and the new default named.conf (and associated files) makes it possible to start up a local resolver "out of the box." If you want a greater degree of freedom in build-time configuration, or you want a version other than what is in your base (for example, you want to use 9.4.x but you're on a 6-stable machine), then you can use the ports. The ports also have an option to overwrite the files in the base if that makes things easier in your environment. hth, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 17:13:35 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0897D16A418 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 17:13:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (pool-71-117-239-216.ptldor.fios.verizon.net [71.117.239.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D124413C45D for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 17:13:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (localhost.home.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l75GZmA9016657 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 09:35:48 -0700 Received: from sopwith.solgatos.com (uucp@localhost) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.4/Submit) with UUCP id l75GZmIZ016654 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 09:35:48 -0700 Received: from localhost by sopwith.solgatos.com (8.8.8/6.24) id QAA17703; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 16:33:12 GMT Message-Id: <200708051633.QAA17703@sopwith.solgatos.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 09:33:12 +0100 From: Dieter Subject: Re: 6.2 not compatible with new sata drives ?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 17:13:35 -0000 >> I got 2 new 160GB drives last month, and my system has been >> unstable ever since. I have swapped cables, purchased a >> brand-new sata150 controller (as opposed to the year old >> sataII), and the results are always the same. > > What make & model controllers? What make & model drives? > Some combinations of controller and drive do not play well > together. I just found your other posting "ad8: FAILURE - device detached". I assume that the new failing disks are >>> ad4: 157066MB at ata2-master SATA150 >>> ad8: 157066MB at ata4-master SATA150 and that they are Hitachi? I still don't know what controller you are using, but I read that nforce4 plus Maxtor or Hitachi disks gives data corruption: http://forums.nvidia.com/lofiversion/index.php?t8171.html I have been using nforce4-ultra with Seagate disks with no data corruption problems. It is not immediately obvious how data corruption would cause your device detached problem, but there could be more than one bug. If your controller works well with your Samsung drives, you could return the Hitachis and get more Samsungs. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 17:17:20 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC1016A417 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 17:17:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david+dated+1186764244.bc8078@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (3s1.com [209.161.205.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7734813C46E for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 17:17:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david+dated+1186764244.bc8078@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 3s1.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l75Gi5wY089160 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 12:44:05 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from david+dated+1186764244.bc8078@skytracker.ca) Received: (from david@localhost) by 3s1.com (8.13.8/8.14.1/Submit) id l75Gi5tG089159 for questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 12:44:05 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from david+dated+1186764244.bc8078@skytracker.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: 3s1.com: david set sender to david+dated+1186764244.bc8078@skytracker.ca using -f Received: by 3s1.com (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1000); Sun, 05 Aug 2007 12:44:04 -0400 Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 12:44:04 -0400 To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070805164403.GA88838@skytracker.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.11 (Ladyburn) From: David Banning X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.1/3863/Sun Aug 5 10:45:33 2007 on 3s1.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on 3s1.com Cc: Subject: apsfilter setup problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 17:17:20 -0000 I am setting up a new installation of apsfilter to a network printer. There a re the install options I have set during apsfilter setup. (D) Available Device Drivers in your gs binary (R) Read Ghostscript driver documentation (devices.txt) (1) Printer Driver Selection [ljet4] (2) Interface Setup [samba] (3) Paper Format [letter] (4) Printing Quality [high] (5) Color Mode [gray] (6) Print Resolution in "dots per inch" [600x600] (7) Default Printing Method [auto] I go to print a test page, and it's successful; Printing Test page using: gs -q -dBATCH -dNOPAUSE -dPARANOIDSAFER -dSAFER -r600x600 -sDEVICE=ljet4 -sPAPERSIZE=letter -sOutputFile='/tmp/apsfilter88754/test_page.aps' setup/test.ps Ok to print testpage? [y/n] y I creates and entry in /etc/printcap; lp|ljet4;r=600x600;q=high;c=gray;p=letter;m=auto:\ :lp=/dev/null:\ :if=/usr/local/etc/apsfilter/basedir/bin/apsfilter:\ :sd=/var/spool/lpd/lp:\ :lf=/var/spool/lpd/lp/log:\ :af=/var/spool/lpd/lp/acct:\ :mx#0:\ :sh: But it will not print with the command ls | lp or ls | lpr or lp -dlp I installed samba without CUPS printing support. # lpc stat all lp: queuing is enabled printing is enabled no entries in spool area printer idle Any ideas how I can bridge from a working test to a non-working print setup? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 17:24:10 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C109316A420 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 17:24:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakheshster@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F4A13C461 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 17:24:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakheshster@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so958452wxd for ; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 10:24:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:x-x-sender:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:from:sender; b=JXvbu5v2eZkhCSpPaFhGS7MuaKRKr+RrPk7G26uQ2WelQijiQfv27gguQ/DoA99rz4eeOP5p2wRteOTFddAdaODwLSOLt+rmnmGKaVUHbP5AmrwujNQvhF6IRwtEBGEf29LguYBF74YSSOpmz2hgdNAqvBq+M6omCpNEeSKxHtE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:date:x-x-sender:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:from:sender; b=OAgfS2+zpoBSDFNKrGZXAyYM0KqEtc1adgbBvwUZs++3QIG61uTmRfOHScis4z2b0DylaNQQiAakKj2RdfJ2WDW2Dsvf3LuCYm6jJOZKW1oc4dmlnj+JPYkv0W1K6Pz+T5ikq0AdtwzA4Wx0/tK4MrDTlZ/xFpmMGNIOGFYVgTg= Received: by 10.70.32.10 with SMTP id f10mr8449909wxf.1186334649257; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 10:24:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.home.rakhesh.com ( [82.178.137.21]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r28sm6140273ele.2007.08.05.10.24.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 05 Aug 2007 10:24:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asterix.home.rakhesh.com (asterix.home.rakhesh.com [192.168.17.23]) by smtp.home.rakhesh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC7111420; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 21:23:47 +0400 (GST) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 21:21:52 +0400 (GST) X-X-Sender: rakhesh@asterix.home.rakhesh.com To: Doug Barton In-Reply-To: <46B5FE07.5080004@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: <20070805211059.P77032@asterix.home.rakhesh.com> References: <499c70c0707260136hea82f27s87dfa53432d0e409@mail.gmail.com> <94c6ae7ae570814564d364bfe9aad8ea@szalbot.homedns.org> <20070801030504.GA3773@bifrost.agrussell.com> <426DE541-FB51-44FF-B7F4-B34E0F9A7861@goldmark.org> <46B0DB5F.4020401@FreeBSD.org> <60BEAECB-C72A-46B3-90D7-F3AB8778605D@goldmark.org> <46B0F17C.2010506@FreeBSD.org> <20070805091932.B67919@scrat.home.rakhesh.com> <46B5FE07.5080004@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Rakhesh Sasidharan Sender: Rakhesh Sasidharan X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 17:30:28 +0000 Cc: Zbigniew Szalbot , Rakhesh Sasidharan , "A.G. Russell IV" , Jeffrey Goldberg , Freebsd questions Subject: Re: Waiting for BIND security announcement X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 17:24:10 -0000 > >> This has probably been asked before, > > Heh, no, never. :) That's a relief. :) >> but if BIND is available in ports then why is it also available in >> contrib? > > Couple of reasons, of relatively equal importance depending on who you > speak to. BSD systems have "always" (I haven't verified this, but > people who should know have told me) shipped with dns stuff on board, > so there is resistance to the idea of stripping it out for that > reason. The other thing that is a concern to a lot of people is that > BIND is more than just named. Take a look at the WITHOUT_BIND* knobs > in src.conf(1) in 7-current or make.conf(1) in 6-stable to get an idea > of how things break down. I have a standing offer to either remove > BIND from the base, or flip the defaults for some of those knobs to > "NO" if the community wants it that way. Makes sense. So to summarize the answer to my question: * BIND is there in contrib coz lot of stuff depends on it and so its best left there. * BIND is also there in ports coz the one there offers you a lot more build time options, is newer, gets updates faster, and is also easier to get up and running with out of the box (in some situations atleast). Neat! :) >> Are there any benefits in choosing the one in contrib over the one >> in ports? > > Advantage to the one in contrib is that it's right there, and the new > default named.conf (and associated files) makes it possible to start > up a local resolver "out of the box." > > If you want a greater degree of freedom in build-time configuration, > or you want a version other than what is in your base (for example, > you want to use 9.4.x but you're on a 6-stable machine), then you can > use the ports. The ports also have an option to overwrite the files in > the base if that makes things easier in your environment. > > hth, Thanks! Rakhesh > > Doug > > -- > > This .signature sanitized for your protection > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 17:45:07 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F38B816A417 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 17:45:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tjudd2k@yahoo.com) Received: from web62413.mail.re1.yahoo.com (web62413.mail.re1.yahoo.com [69.147.75.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B3AFD13C428 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 17:45:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tjudd2k@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 90209 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Aug 2007 17:45:05 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=UVKvw+y3kIzUkD2Qig4sZxUZTwoYHetQV34UHzkzmoA8uERmy9mtkoJuvepw4JqMb6velpCaC3ogxkCDoEvNPqgAS/hpjTwLJTN047xEETgD+FsAQ3RoFunYnzZmgGce2i3cnspvOcCn8CR4jigIdyOnVI/nu4+7FMPKo/VNFN4=; X-YMail-OSG: SfnuuwMVM1n08Q.8ppoyETVyVf1nN2FMy1NdVqnxTrRyVJw9P6vqmr9535yIj9LRZ7gEytpwIZxPOG37QySvVdjr6fXj4JUA.DmUCsbmp2ZgvGB2x8E4rq97.KvBLMlO Received: from [68.35.175.118] by web62413.mail.re1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 10:45:05 PDT Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 10:45:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Tim Judd To: Damian Vicino MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <573460.89378.qm@web62413.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Using Smart-Fail HD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 17:45:07 -0000 I'm on the digest list. I have copied/pasted the OP ---------------------QUOTE: Message: 17 Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:00:07 -0300 From: Damian Vicino Subject: Using Smart-Fail HD To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <46B4E8D7.4060700@dc.uba.ar> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Hello. Im Having FBSD running in a P3 with 4.3GB HD, and got 2 extra 80GBs HD that fails the SMART check. I did a full HD scan with tools provided by the HD's developers and over 90% of the HDs are safe. I want to use those HD for home of the lowrank users, and keep the critical data in the 4GB HD. Do u know any pretty safe FS for this kind of unstable hardware, i was thinking in something with software RAID maybe. Thanks for any suggestion, im pretty new on FBSD world (and english-speak world too). BTW, if the solution can be applied to DFBSD, it will be very nice, becouse i got another machine P1 runnning it, and all HDs i can get for it use to have a lot of failures already. See ya Sdäv --------------------/QUOTE Damian, You might find Steve Gibson's SpinRite a really useful purchase. It recovers most drives it works on, and a single purchase can be use on any of your personal drives. It is it's own bootable floppy or CD, and works very well. http://www.grc.com/sr/spinrite.htm I recommend using that now, and then tread lightly until you feel confident about the drives again. If opportunity doesn't knock, build a door. "I can" is a way of life. More and Bigger is not always Better. The road to success is always uphill. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Luggage? GPS? Comic books? Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=graduation+gifts&cs=bz From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 18:31:01 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA90616A41A for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 18:31:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [195.170.0.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3484213C442 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 18:31:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from atlantis.dyndns.org (athedsl-70343.home.otenet.gr [87.203.156.21]) by rosebud.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id l75IUsvN027285; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 21:30:55 +0300 Message-ID: <46B6175E.8010408@otenet.gr> Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 21:30:54 +0300 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: fbsd2@a1poweruser.com References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to know the size of RAM memory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 18:31:01 -0000 fbsd2 wrote: > I tried what people said to do and I get different values that do not match > what the bios say. > Why is there so large a difference? > How can this be explained??? > > # /root >sysctl -a | grep -i memory > Virtual Memory: (Total: 2871K, Active 91444K) > Real Memory: (Total: 37324K Active 12756K) > Shared Virtual Memory: (Total: 15088K Active: 9864K) > Shared Real Memory: (Total: 3284K Active: 2700K) > Free Memory Pages: 20896K > > > # /root >dmesg | grep -i memory > real memory = 67108864 (64 MB) > avail memory = 56094720 (53 MB) > > bios show > base 640k > extended 64512k > cache 384k > total = 65536k > > > Though the answer from sysctl maybe somewhat confusing, the answer from dmesg is exactly what you get from BIOS: 64MB = 65536 K just like your bios reports. As for the base / extended /cache distinction in the BIOS, these belong to the ancient "DOS" era and have nothing to do with modern operating systems. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 19:12:32 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A9F16A419 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 19:12:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1694113C480 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 19:12:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l75JCAxu032919; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 21:12:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id l75JC9oY032916; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 21:12:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 21:12:09 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Manolis Kiagias In-Reply-To: <46B6175E.8010408@otenet.gr> Message-ID: <20070805211139.P32915@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <46B6175E.8010408@otenet.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: fbsd2@a1poweruser.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to know the size of RAM memory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 19:12:33 -0000 >> # /root >dmesg | grep -i memory >> real memory = 67108864 (64 MB) >> avail memory = 56094720 (53 MB) this is true - 64MB From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 19:19:15 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5AB716A418 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 19:19:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDBFA13C461 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 19:19:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l75JJ86o032991 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 21:19:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id l75JJ8u4032988 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 21:19:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 21:19:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070805211444.N32915@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: using mouse wheel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 19:19:15 -0000 i just bought some cheap PS/2 mouse (A4 tech) 3-keys while middle key is a wheel that can be both pressed and rolled no rolling works both in text and xorg moused_enable="YES" in rc.conf and Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Mouse0" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "auto" Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7" EndSection in xorg.conf do i have to add something? my friend uses USB mouse and scrolling works as is. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 19:42:53 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD6616A421 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 19:42:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A15213C45B for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 19:42:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1AE751910 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 15:42:51 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 20:42:48 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070805204248.4479676e@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20070805211444.N32915@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20070805211444.N32915@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.10.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: using mouse wheel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 19:42:53 -0000 On Sun, 5 Aug 2007 21:19:08 +0200 (CEST) Wojciech Puchar wrote: > i just bought some cheap PS/2 mouse (A4 tech) 3-keys while middle key > is a wheel that can be both pressed and rolled > > > no rolling works both in text and xorg > > moused_enable="YES" > > in rc.conf > > and > > Section "InputDevice" > Identifier "Mouse0" > Driver "mouse" > Option "Protocol" "auto" > Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" > Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7" > EndSection > > > in xorg.conf > > do i have to add something? Try running xev. Put the pointer over the test window, and rotate the wheel backwards and forward to see its button numbers. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 20:25:11 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D84616A494 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 20:25:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vss@73rus.com) Received: from tail.lionet.info (tail.lionet.info [216.218.215.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C03B13C46A for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 20:25:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vss@73rus.com) Received: from [192.168.1.106] (adsl-68-124-190-189.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [68.124.190.189]) (authenticated bits=0) by tail.lionet.info (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l75JvAK2026676 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 12:57:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from vss@73rus.com) Message-ID: <46B62B95.1080309@73rus.com> Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 12:57:09 -0700 From: Vlad Skvortsov User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Macintosh/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (tail.lionet.info [216.218.215.226]); Sun, 05 Aug 2007 12:57:11 -0700 (PDT) Cc: Subject: encore pci controller card usb 2.0 showing up as usb revision 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 20:25:11 -0000 Hi! I'm a bit puzzled by the behavior of my FreeBSD 6-STABLE: 11:47 [root@bear] ~ # uname -a FreeBSD bear.escuela 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #2: Sun Jul 8 22:21:10 PDT 2007 root@tiger.escuela:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BEAR i386 I've installed a USB2.0 PCI card by Encore (http://www.encore-usa.com/product_item.php?region=us&bid=2&pgid=18&pid=40) but it shows up as "USB revision 1.0": uhci1: port 0x1020-0x103f irq 10 at device 16.0 on p ci0 uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: port 0x1060-0x107f irq 11 at device 16.1 on p ci0 uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb2: on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered The data transfer rate from the attached drive also seems to be USB1-ish: 11:54 [root@bear] ~ # !513 dd if=/dev/da0 of=/dev/null bs=1m count=10 10+0 records in 10+0 records out 10485760 bytes transferred in 10.137750 secs (1034328 bytes/sec) Any clues? -- Vlad Skvortsov, vss@73rus.com, http://vss.73rus.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 21:49:18 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B978816A417 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 21:49:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd2@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (Mail-03.name-services.com [64.74.223.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A764513C457 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 21:49:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd2@a1poweruser.com) Received: from laptop ([76.190.247.202]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 5 Aug 2007 14:52:05 -0700 From: "fbsd2" To: "Wojciech Puchar" , "Manolis Kiagias" Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 17:49:18 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 In-Reply-To: <20070805211139.P32915@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Importance: Normal X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Aug 2007 21:52:05.0504 (UTC) FILETIME=[DCF89800:01C7D7AA] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: How to know the size of RAM memory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd2@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 21:49:18 -0000 What is the meaning of the 67108864 number? -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Wojciech Puchar Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2007 3:12 PM To: Manolis Kiagias Cc: fbsd2@a1poweruser.com; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to know the size of RAM memory >> # /root >dmesg | grep -i memory >> real memory = 67108864 (64 MB) >> avail memory = 56094720 (53 MB) this is true - 64MB _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 21:51:20 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF9816A419 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 21:51:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from novembre@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C899513C465 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 21:51:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from novembre@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a73so2347277pye for ; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 14:51:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=BT+4EoUErEYr485fv6wiapkWCtngvdXXe0JANpcBfr2GmCVXBlgmXdvBoktVfWgr6tpi3KZ/C/oOLjx4NeDhzxRFciCPneah4RycZUptHQFbPQn6AjHeRzSKb+3hvjk5SdxcESSBwKK02klw3NTxgd+O/CnWqBjVTw+45Bwtg9c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=O9cL1jiRxzOUmTkhcFbs/GANtILNYklwb0mdC9R87wIKrOHCiqkv5M0l5d8Hi47sacZ0GQK7QWRiCmXLKU4i07zkWIQCBIQQ5V2Cwx2etHu7TzQykZeWemse+Jf0QvDLxI7GF2u0fWyh5tv6Bz5MrWYpFkMuMw95J8T0yODHMTA= Received: by 10.65.51.4 with SMTP id d4mr7814381qbk.1186350678839; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 14:51:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.210.16 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 14:51:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3b47caa90708051451t3a9cbe2fs2c20f99fd76b0476@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 16:51:18 -0500 From: Novembre To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <3b47caa90708041410s30f87f52g4d928c928e5f0eb0@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3b47caa90708041410s30f87f52g4d928c928e5f0eb0@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: keyboard layout change in Xorg 7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 21:51:20 -0000 On 8/4/07, Novembre wrote: > > I have Xfce 4.4.1_1 on top of X.org 7.2 running on FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASEinstalled on a Pentium III-S > 1.4GHz machine. > The problem is that the ALT keys are not working when using XkbLayout > option in xorg.conf when I put the following lines in /etc/X11/xorg.conf: > > Option "XkbLayout" "us,ir" > Option "XkbOptions" "grp:alt_shift_toggle" > > With these options, single ALT keys do not work, and I mean not just in > changing the keyboard layout, but anywhere! For example, ALT-TAB which > should change the current window does not work anymore. I have found out > that in this case, i.e. using XkbLayout option, if I press both ALT keys > at the same time, it'll do work! So, LEFTALT-RIGHTALT-TAB changes the > current window, and LEFTALT-RIGHTALT-SHIFT changes the layout. I have no > idea why, and I see no reason why, since I told X that the layout needs to > be changed when I press only ONE of the ALT keys (and I have not mentioned > which one, so both should be okay) and the SHIFT key. It's very troublesome, > and I don't want to hold down both ALTs instead of just one of them. The > same setting used to work when I was using Xfce 4.2 on top of X.org 6.9. > Any ideas? > > Thanks a lot > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 23:52:00 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1AF16A417 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 23:52:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from listreader@lazlarlyricon.com) Received: from proxy3.bredband.net (proxy3.bredband.net [195.54.101.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6EAD13C46A for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 23:51:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from listreader@lazlarlyricon.com) Received: from trapper.homedns.org (213.114.40.248) by proxy3.bredband.net (7.3.127) id 46AF6456001BB6F4 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 01:31:24 +0200 Received: from trapper.homedns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by trapper.homedns.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l75NVNqt001112 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 01:31:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from listreader@lazlarlyricon.com) Message-ID: <46B65DCB.8020307@lazlarlyricon.com> Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 01:31:23 +0200 From: Rolf G Nielsen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: USB mouse issues. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 23:52:00 -0000 Hi, My new USB mouse (a Logitech G5) works fine both in the console (with moused) and under X (both with moused and directly)... For the most part... However, once in a while it just dies (the lights indicating the DPI setting on top and the lights underneath it goes off and it stops responding). Since, according to the ehci man page, the USB 2.0 driver is quite buggy, I tried disabling it, but the problem didn't go away. I've also tried connecting the mouse to different USB connectors without luck. Every time it happens I get two lines in the /var/log/messages file: Aug 6 01:03:50 trapper kernel: usb1: host controller process error Aug 6 01:03:50 trapper kernel: usb1: host controller halted Now for my questions: Does anyone have any suggestions as to what causes this? The mouse itself? The USB host controllers (then all four controllers on my motherboard are faulty)? Buggy USB driver (if that is the case, both ehci and uhci are buggy)? Any other possibilities, that I haven't considered? I'd apprectiate any help, since this annoys the hell out of me. -- Sincerly, Rolf Nielsen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 00:29:05 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1715316A420 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 00:29:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tmclaugh@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from straycat.dhs.org (c-24-63-86-11.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.63.86.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EBD913C46C for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 00:29:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tmclaugh@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from [192.168.1.127] (bofh.straycat.dhs.org [192.168.1.127]) by straycat.dhs.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l760BaRY013322; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 20:11:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Tom McLaughlin To: Jeffrey Goldberg In-Reply-To: <0A638D13-F341-4645-B750-33B08730EDA7@goldmark.org> References: <0A638D13-F341-4645-B750-33B08730EDA7@goldmark.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 15:36:28 -0400 Message-Id: <1186342588.5848.2.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: stty: unknown mode: doofus X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 00:29:05 -0000 On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 08:47 -0500, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote: > During an installation, ports/lang/python24, I did a > > sudo make install > > And was prompted for my password. I entered it (probably miskeyed it > as I was leaning over the keyboard from a strange position and got a > response back of > > stty: unknown mode: doofus ins_csops.h:28 "stty: unknown mode: doofus", My first reaction was, "$#%@, what did I miss now?" Then I did some hunting to find that was an actual insult and not an error from sudo. :) tom -- | tmclaugh at sdf.lonestar.org tmclaugh at FreeBSD.org | | FreeBSD http://www.FreeBSD.org | From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 00:42:54 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B10FC16A419 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 00:42:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@Riderway.com) Received: from exhub015-2.exch015.msoutlookonline.net (exhub015-2.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E48B13C48A for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 00:42:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@Riderway.com) Received: from philip.office.rws (74.93.213.162) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.0.730.1; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 17:42:53 -0700 Message-ID: <46B66E8C.3080506@riderway.com> Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 20:42:52 -0400 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: Rideray Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070703) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "fbsd2@a1poweruser.com" References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Wojciech Puchar , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , Manolis Kiagias Subject: Re: How to know the size of RAM memory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 00:42:54 -0000 fbsd2 wrote: > What is the meaning of the 67108864 number? Its 64MB in bytes. [08:42 PM](ttyp0)pgollucci@philip.office.rws j0 h2 c502 /usr/home/pgollucci> bc 64*1024 65536 .*1024 67108864 -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Philip M. Gollucci (philip@riderway.com) 323.219.4708 Senior System Admin - Riderway, Inc. http://riderway.com 1024D/EC88A0BF 0DE5 C55C 6BF3 B235 2DAB B89E 1324 9B4F EC88 A0BF Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 01:42:50 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A0C16A418 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 01:42:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@Riderway.com) Received: from exhub015-2.exch015.msoutlookonline.net (exhub015-2.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2DA213C442 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 01:42:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@Riderway.com) Received: from philip.office.rws (74.93.213.162) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.0.730.1; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 18:42:41 -0700 Message-ID: <46B67C90.3010603@riderway.com> Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 21:42:40 -0400 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: Rideray Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070703) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "questions@FreeBSD.org" X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Unbelievably bad RAID-1 performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 01:42:51 -0000 while writing to the disk gstat screenshot http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/disks.png If I move the location to '/' (da0s1a) which AFAIK is at the center of disk(smaller thus faster rpms) should be faster, performance is at least 100times worse which is the opposite I would expect. Is there anything I can do to help this out. I'm likely going to chuck the raid card in the trash and just use one disk and reply on backups which I already have going. Dell PowerEdge 1435SC Dual Intel Core2 Duo 2.4GHz 4GB RAM RAID-1 Config with 2 disks@240GB each FreeBSD 6.2-release-p5 amd64 custom kernel. mpt0: port 0xdc00-0xdcff mem 0xeffec000-0xeffeffff,0xefff0000-0xefffffff irq 35 at device 8.0 on pci7 mpt0: [GIANT-LOCKED] mpt0: MPI Version=1.5.12.0 mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x16 mpt0: Unhandled Event Notify Frame. Event 0x16 (ACK not required). mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x12 mpt0: Unhandled Event Notify Frame. Event 0x12 (ACK not required). mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x12 mpt0: Unhandled Event Notify Frame. Event 0x12 (ACK not required). mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x16 mpt0: Unhandled Event Notify Frame. Event 0x16 (ACK not required). mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0xb mpt0: Unhandled Event Notify Frame. Event 0xb (ACK not required). da0 at mpt0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-5 device da0: 300.000MB/s transfers, Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 237464MB (486326272 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 30272C) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Philip M. Gollucci (philip@riderway.com) 323.219.4708 Senior System Admin - Riderway, Inc. http://riderway.com 1024D/EC88A0BF 0DE5 C55C 6BF3 B235 2DAB B89E 1324 9B4F EC88 A0BF Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 02:22:30 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E507116A417 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 02:22:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from speedtoys.racing@gmail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6531F13C442 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 02:22:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from speedtoys.racing@gmail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b27so1539041fka for ; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 19:22:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ClP2c0LPLv2UTbpO75WV4Yg4shwsO2PdCT712ugqMo/kWH3EvkMf2xqgP9FU2TFRBBaVBSB/3puhwKRsYheegEdGsInQm+wefv8kg4JvR/8vGb+Zj8xmyY0yTa9mcsEi7afOLLm0YsUaKV6J8GgVcMx//h+2YNV51ohIiu/Qa4g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=TO2GSIHC3GXHUEpgW3TJnWa4FyaRY3guj6INUHHN8Hen121//OO67SJwJBuYqjSKD0YCAHh4qHfOGWyMpm1i0JaOBrBDX3ERRwp0F+Ogv2eOeqSf2qrA/4hvkhOM6QMgAeKBYDalFjvprfm41XPR/dUjr11MnBuiQrCVyg2m7t0= Received: by 10.82.151.14 with SMTP id y14mr5065675bud.1186365327286; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 18:55:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.170.5 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 18:55:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 18:55:27 -0700 From: "Jeff Mohler" To: "Philip M. Gollucci" In-Reply-To: <46B67C90.3010603@riderway.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <46B67C90.3010603@riderway.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "questions@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: Unbelievably bad RAID-1 performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 02:22:30 -0000 The EDGE is faster byte wise, not the center. The distance between traditional or perpendicular sectors remains the same, just more of them around the drive at a given distance from the center, than at the center. So..because RPM remains the same at all distances from the center, you will read more sectors per second at the edge, than center. Although..that wont make a 100x difference in speed..I wouldnt think. On 8/5/07, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > > while writing to the disk > > gstat screenshot > http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/disks.png > > If I move the location to '/' (da0s1a) which AFAIK is at the center of > disk(smaller thus faster rpms) should be faster, performance is at least > 100times worse which is the opposite I would expect. > > Is there anything I can do to help this out. I'm likely going to chuck > the raid card in the trash and just use one disk and reply on backups > which I already have going. > > Dell PowerEdge 1435SC > Dual Intel Core2 Duo 2.4GHz 4GB RAM > RAID-1 Config with 2 disks@240GB each > FreeBSD 6.2-release-p5 amd64 custom kernel. > > mpt0: port 0xdc00-0xdcff mem > 0xeffec000-0xeffeffff,0xefff0000-0xefffffff irq 35 at device 8.0 on pci7 > mpt0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > mpt0: MPI Version=1.5.12.0 > mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x16 > mpt0: Unhandled Event Notify Frame. Event 0x16 (ACK not required). > mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x12 > mpt0: Unhandled Event Notify Frame. Event 0x12 (ACK not required). > mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x12 > mpt0: Unhandled Event Notify Frame. Event 0x12 (ACK not required). > mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x16 > mpt0: Unhandled Event Notify Frame. Event 0x16 (ACK not required). > mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0xb > mpt0: Unhandled Event Notify Frame. Event 0xb (ACK not required). > > da0 at mpt0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-5 device > da0: 300.000MB/s transfers, Tagged Queueing Enabled > da0: 237464MB (486326272 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 30272C) > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Philip M. Gollucci (philip@riderway.com) 323.219.4708 > Senior System Admin - Riderway, Inc. http://riderway.com > 1024D/EC88A0BF 0DE5 C55C 6BF3 B235 2DAB B89E 1324 9B4F EC88 A0BF > > Work like you don't need the money, > love like you'll never get hurt, > and dance like nobody's watching. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 02:56:19 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04D116A41B for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 02:56:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (relay2.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41F1A13C458 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 02:56:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru) X-Virus-Scanned: by Dr.Web (R) daemon for FreeBSD, v4.33 at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from [172.16.138.125] (account sudakovva@sibptus.tomsk.ru HELO admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.8) with ESMTPSA id 8362292 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 09:56:15 +0700 Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l762uFmk021416 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 09:56:15 +0700 (OMSST) (envelope-from sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru using -f Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 09:56:15 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov To: User Questions Message-ID: <20070806025614.GA21368@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20070724115401.GA1355@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070724115401.GA1355@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://vas.tomsk.ru/vas.asc Subject: Re: dump -L X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 02:56:20 -0000 Victor Sudakov wrote: > > I always use "dump -L" to dump a live filesystem. > However, when I restore the dump, I sometimes get messages like > "foo.txt (inode 12345) not found on tape" or > "expected next file 12345, got 23456" > > I thought this should _never_ happen when dumping a snapshot. > > What is it? Does nobody know the answer, or am I the only one experiencing the problem? Here is another example: [root@big ~] restore -b64 -rN ./spool/samba.lock/wins.dat: (inode 2829098) not found on tape expected next file 267, got 4 expected next file 2828988, got 2828987 -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 03:10:52 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E337516A480 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 03:10:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: from vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (vjofn-pt.tunnel.tserv1.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:ffff::5e5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A24C513C480 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 03:10:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: from himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (cpe-68-175-8-11.hvc.res.rr.com [68.175.8.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l763AlQU061910 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 23:10:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (localhost.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com [127.0.0.1]) by himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l763AgqC025647 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 23:10:42 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: (from tbohml@localhost) by himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.13.8/8.13.6/Submit) id l763AgsF025646 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 23:10:42 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tbohml) From: "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" Message-Id: <200708060310.l763AgsF025646@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 23:10:42 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL8] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: portupgrade modifys EVERY +CONTENTS now? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 03:10:53 -0000 Hi, I've noticed that recent version(s?) of portupgrade seem to update the +CONTENTS of *EVERY* package on my system, not just the ones it used to actually make a difference to. Is there a way to revert to the old behaviour? With 915 ports (WAS only around 600 before the recent Xorg upgrade) its a killer. On my Soekris with a CF drive, and only 57 ports, its still killing that CF chip. Thanks, Tuc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 04:23:31 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A62A716A417 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 04:23:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92E9513C442 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 04:23:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot26.obsecurity.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 292191A4D7C; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 21:22:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot26.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D87FAC1D2; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 00:23:30 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 00:23:30 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" Message-ID: <20070806042330.GA30245@rot26.obsecurity.org> References: <200708060310.l763AgsF025646@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200708060310.l763AgsF025646@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade modifys EVERY +CONTENTS now? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 04:23:31 -0000 On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 11:10:42PM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > Hi, > > I've noticed that recent version(s?) of portupgrade seem to update > the +CONTENTS of *EVERY* package on my system, not just the ones it used to > actually make a difference to. Is there a way to revert to the old behaviour? > With 915 ports (WAS only around 600 before the recent Xorg upgrade) its a > killer. On my Soekris with a CF drive, and only 57 ports, its still killing > that CF chip. Please show us how you came to this conclusion. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 04:29:55 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706F716A419 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 04:29:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlecic@EUnet.yu) Received: from eunet.yu (smtpclu-1.eunet.yu [194.247.192.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F201713C46B for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 04:29:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlecic@EUnet.yu) Received: from nyx.localhost (adsl-213-46.eunet.yu [213.198.213.46]) by eunet.yu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l764Toou007190; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 06:29:51 +0200 Message-Id: <200708060429.l764Toou007190@eunet.yu> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 06:24:57 +0200 From: Nikola Lecic To: David Banning In-Reply-To: <20070805164403.GA88838@skytracker.ca> References: <20070805164403.GA88838@skytracker.ca> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.10.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE X-Face: pbl6-.[$G'Fi(Ogs2xlXP-V6{3||$Y[LOYs&~GJoikj'cVjcFC[V7du;;0~6nO= [Vi2?uU1Pq~,=Adj@,T:|"`$AF~il]J.Nz#2pU',Y7.{B;m/?{#sO^Dvo$rnmY6] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-EUNET-AVAS-Milter-Version: 2.0.0 X-AVAS-Virus-Status: clean X-AVAS-Spamd-Symbols: BAYES_50,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-AVAS-Spam-Score: 0.0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: apsfilter setup problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 04:29:55 -0000 (I apologise if this pops-up twice but it seems that sending to questions@ -- and not to freebsd-questions@ -- doesn't work for me.) On Sun, 5 Aug 2007 12:44:04 -0400 David Banning wrote: > I am setting up a new installation of apsfilter to a network printer. > There a re the install options I have set during apsfilter setup. >=20 >=20 > (D) Available Device Drivers in your gs binary > (R) Read Ghostscript driver documentation > (devices.txt) >=20 > (1) Printer Driver Selection [ljet4] > (2) Interface Setup [samba] > (3) Paper Format [letter] > (4) Printing Quality [high] > (5) Color Mode [gray] > (6) Print Resolution in "dots per inch" [600x600] > (7) Default Printing Method [auto] >=20 >=20 > I go to print a test page, and it's successful; >=20 > Printing Test page using: > gs -q -dBATCH -dNOPAUSE -dPARANOIDSAFER -dSAFER > -r600x600 -sDEVICE=3Dljet4 -sPAPERSIZE=3Dletter > -sOutputFile=3D'/tmp/apsfilter88754/test_page.aps' setup/test.ps >=20 > Ok to print testpage? [y/n] y >=20 >=20 > I creates and entry in /etc/printcap; >=20 > lp|ljet4;r=3D600x600;q=3Dhigh;c=3Dgray;p=3Dletter;m=3Dauto:\ > :lp=3D/dev/null:\ > :if=3D/usr/local/etc/apsfilter/basedir/bin/apsfilter:\ > :sd=3D/var/spool/lpd/lp:\ > :lf=3D/var/spool/lpd/lp/log:\ > :af=3D/var/spool/lpd/lp/acct:\ > :mx#0:\ > :sh: >=20 > But it will not print with the command >=20 > ls | lp >=20 > or =20 >=20 > ls | lpr >=20 > or=20 >=20 > lp -dlp >=20 >=20 > I installed samba without CUPS printing support. >=20 > # lpc stat all > lp: > queuing is enabled > printing is enabled > no entries in spool area > printer idle >=20 >=20 >=20 > Any ideas how I can bridge from a working test to a non-working=20 > print setup? Hello David, You should let apsfilter SETUP program to add the entry in printcap (you wrote that you added it yourself). It should be marked with something like: # APS1_BEGIN:printer1 # - don't delete start label for apsfilter printer1 # - no other printer defines between BEGIN and END LABEL [...] # APS1_END - don't delete this Apart from this, your printcap details seem good. However, the problem you described could be related to permissions. You run SETUP program as root, but you try to print as an ordinary user, I guess. Please check permissions/ownership of samba-client configuration file under /usr/local/etc/apsfilter/. Nikola Le=C4=8Di=C4=87 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 04:49:44 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 024F316A419 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 04:49:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: from vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (vjofn-pt.tunnel.tserv1.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:ffff::5e5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 866B813C442 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 04:49:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: from himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (cpe-68-175-8-11.hvc.res.rr.com [68.175.8.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l764ncho063615; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 00:49:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (localhost.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com [127.0.0.1]) by himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l764nWRB031998; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 00:49:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: (from tbohml@localhost) by himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.13.8/8.13.6/Submit) id l764nVxW031996; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 00:49:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tbohml) From: "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" Message-Id: <200708060449.l764nVxW031996@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> To: kris@obsecurity.org (Kris Kennaway) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 00:49:31 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20070806042330.GA30245@rot26.obsecurity.org> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL8] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade modifys EVERY +CONTENTS now? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 04:49:44 -0000 > > On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 11:10:42PM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've noticed that recent version(s?) of portupgrade seem to update > > the +CONTENTS of *EVERY* package on my system, not just the ones it used to > > actually make a difference to. Is there a way to revert to the old behaviour? > > With 915 ports (WAS only around 600 before the recent Xorg upgrade) its a > > killer. On my Soekris with a CF drive, and only 57 ports, its still killing > > that CF chip. > > Please show us how you came to this conclusion. > > Kris > "script" output from a recent update : ---> Upgrade of sysutils/bsdstats started at: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:52:00 -0400 ---> Upgrading 'bsdstats-5.3' to 'bsdstats-5.3_4' (sysutils/bsdstats) OK? [yes] ---> Build of sysutils/bsdstats started at: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:52:09 -0400 ---> Building '/usr/ports/sysutils/bsdstats' ===> Cleaning for bsdstats-5.3_4 ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> Extracting for bsdstats-5.3_4 ===> Patching for bsdstats-5.3_4 ===> Configuring for bsdstats-5.3_4 ---> Build of sysutils/bsdstats ended at: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:52:10 -0400 (cons umed 00:00:00) ---> Updating dependency info ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/Hermes-1.3.3_2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/ImageMagick-6.3.2.0/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_3/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/ORBit2-2.14.3/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/OpenEXR-1.2.2_1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/OpenSP-1.5.2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/Xaw3d-1.5E_1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/aalib-1.4.r5_2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/acroread7-7.0.8,1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/acroreadwrapper-0.0.20060221/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/adns-1.4/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/aircrack-2.41/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/antiword-0.37_1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/apache-1.3.37_3/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/apr-gdbm-db42-1.2.8_1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/argp-standalone-1.3/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/arts-1.5.4,1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/artswrapper-1.5.3/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/aspell-0.60.4_4/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/atk-1.12.4/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/autoconf-2.53_3/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/autoconf-2.59_2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/automake-1.5_2,1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/automake-1.9.6/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/avahi-0.6.15/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/ayttm-esound-0.4.6.17_3/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/bash-3.2.17_2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/bigreqsproto-1.0.2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/bison-1.75_2,1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/bitstream-vera-1.10_2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/blackened-1.8.1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/boinc-client-5.8.15/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/boinc-setiathome-enhanced-5.13/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/bonk-0.6/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/bonobo-1.0.22_3/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/bsd-airtools-0.3/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/bsdpan-Business-PayPal-API-0.50/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/bsdpan-Mail-SpamAssassin-CompiledRegexps-body_0-1.0/ +CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/bsdstats-5.3/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/c-ares-config-1.4.0/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/ca-roots-1.2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/cairo-1.2.6/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/cdialog-1.0.20060221,1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/cdparanoia-3.9.8_8/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/cdrtools-2.01_6/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/chmlib-0.39/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/chmview-2.0.b3/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/coldsync-2.2.5_4/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/cole-2.0.1_1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/compat4x-i386-5.3_9/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/csound-4.23/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/cups-base-1.2.7/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/curl-7.16.1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_3/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/cyrus-sasl-2.1.22/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/cyrus-sasl-saslauthd-2.1.22/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/db3-3.3.11_3,1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/db4-4.0.14_1,1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/db41-4.1.25_4/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/db42-4.2.52_5/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/dbus-1.0.1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/dbus-glib-0.72/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/dcc-dccd-1.3.50/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/desktop-file-utils-0.12/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/dirmngr-0.9.7_2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/djbfft-0.76_2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/dmidecode-2.8/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/docbook-1.3/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/docbook-241_2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/docbook-3.0_2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/docbook-3.1_2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/docbook-4.0_2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/docbook-4.1_2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/docbook-4.2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/docbook-sk-4.1.2_3/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/docbook-xml-4.2_1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/docbook-xsl-1.71.1_2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/dri-6.4.1,2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/dsssl-docbook-modular-1.79_1,1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/dynamips-0.2.5_2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/eawpats-12_3/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/elm-2.5.8/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/esound-0.2.38/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/est-0.7.2_2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/estctrl-0.8_2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/expat-2.0.0_1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/expect-5.43.0_1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/ezm3-1.2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/faac-1.25/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/faad2-2.5,1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/fam-2.6.10_1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/fastest_cvsup-0.2.9_5/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/faxmail-2.3/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/fetchmail-6.3.8_3/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/fetchyahoo-2.10.8/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/ffmpeg-0.4.9.p1_6/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/fftw-2.1.5_3/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/fftw3-3.1.2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/fftw3-float-3.1.2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/firefox-1.5.0.7_1,1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/firetalk-0.0.11/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/flac-1.1.2_1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/fontconfig-2.4.2_2,1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/freebsd-uucp-1.07.2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/freesbie-2.0.20070710/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/freetype2-2.2.1_2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/fribidi-0.10.7/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/g-wrap-1.3.4_9,1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gail-1.9.3/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gaim-1.5.0_8/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gaim-irchelper-0.13_1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gal-0.24_2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gcc-3.2.3_3/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gcc-3.4.6,1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gconf-1.0.9_9/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gconf2-2.16.0/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gdbm-1.8.3_3/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gdk-pixbuf-0.22.0_5/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gengetopt-2.19.1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gettext-0.16.1_3/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/ghostscript-gnu-7.07_15/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gimp-2.2.13_1,1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/glib-1.2.10_12/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/glib-2.12.4/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/glibwww-0.2_4/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gmake-3.81_2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gnome-db-0.2.96_6/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gnome-libs-1.4.2_6/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gnome-mime-data-2.4.3/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gnome-print-0.37_3/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gnome-vfs-1.0.5_8/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gnome-vfs-2.16.3/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gnome_subr-1.0/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gnomecanvas-0.22.0_5/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gnomehier-2.2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gnowavcut-0.0.8_3/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gnucash-1.8.12_4/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gnucash-docs-1.8.4/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gnupg-2.0.4/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gnutls-1.6.1_2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/google-earth-4.1.7076.4458/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gpac-libgpac-0.4.2.r2,1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gpgme-0.3.16_6/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gpgme-1.1.2_1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gpsd-2.32/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gsfonts-8.11_4/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gsm-1.0.12/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gstreamer-0.10.10_1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gstreamer-plugins-0.10.10,2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gstreamer-plugins80-0.8.12_2,1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gstreamer80-0.8.12_2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gtar-1.17_1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gtk-1.2.10_17/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gtk-2.10.6_1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gtk-engines2-2.8.2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gtk-gnutella-0.96.3/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gtkglarea-1.2.3_1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gtkhtml-1.1.10_6/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gtkmm-1.2.8_6/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gtkspell-2.0.11_4/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/guile-1.6.8/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/guile-gtk-0.41_2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/guppi-0.40.3_6/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/gv-3.6.2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/hal-0.5.8.20061117/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/help2man-1.36.4_1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/hicolor-icon-theme-0.10_2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/hpijs-2.1.4/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/icu2-2.8/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/id3lib-3.8.3_3/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/imake-6.9.0/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/imlib-1.9.15_4/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/imlib2-20060926,1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/inputproto-1.3.2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/intltool-0.35.0/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/isc-dhcp3-server-3.0.5_2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/iso8879-1986_2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/ispell-3.2.06_18/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/jackit-0.102.20/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/jade-1.2.1_9/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/jasper-1.900.1_5/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/javavmwrapper-2.1_3/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/jbigkit-1.6/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/john-1.7.2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/jpeg-6b_4/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/kbproto-1.0.3/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/kdehier-1.0_11/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/kermit-8.0.211/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/kexis-0.2.2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/kismet-200701.r1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/ksh93-20070628/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/lame-3.97_1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/laudio-0.4/+CONTENTS (etc) ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/xpdf-3.01_3/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/xproto-7.0.10/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/xterm-222/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/xtrans-1.0.3/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/xv-3.10a_6/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/xvattr-1.3_2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/xvid-1.1.3,1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/xword-0.07_2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/yasm-0.6.1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/zh-chm2html-0.1a/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/zip-2.32/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/zsh-4.3.2_1/+CONTENTS ---> Uninstallation of bsdstats-5.3 started at: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:52:29 -0400 ---> Fixing up dependencies before creating a package ---> Backing up the old version ---> Uninstalling the old version ---> Deinstalling 'bsdstats-5.3' pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory '/usr/local/etc/periodic' pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps the packing list is incorrectly specified?) [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 625 packages found ( -1 +0) (...) done] ---> Uninstallation of bsdstats-5.3 ended at: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:52:47 -0400 ( consumed 00:00:18) ---> Installation of sysutils/bsdstats started at: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:52:47 -0 400 ---> Installing the new version via the port ===> Installing for bsdstats-5.3_4 ===> Generating temporary packing list ===> Checking if sysutils/bsdstats already installed (etc) Tuc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 05:22:09 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D007316A417 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 05:22:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hburton@mraentertainment.com) Received: from mail.mraentertainment.com (243-145-222-203.static.techex.net.au [203.222.145.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E362713C480 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 05:22:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hburton@mraentertainment.com) Received: (qmail 60901 invoked by uid 89); 6 Aug 2007 05:22:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.187?) (hburton@mraentertainment.com@192.168.1.187) by mickey.mraentertainment with ESMTPA; 6 Aug 2007 05:22:06 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: From: Hartleigh Burton Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 15:21:45 +1000 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Large Volumes - 2.2TB missing... expecting 3.4TB! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 05:22:09 -0000 Hi Everyone, I have installed FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE amd64 on a new boxen... and just realized that I am missing just a 'little' bit of storage space ;) The raid array is as follows: 3ware 9650SE-8LPML Controller 1 x 76GB OS RAID 1 Array (2 x 80GB drives) 1 x 3.4TB DATA RAID 5 Array (6 x 700GB drives) In order for FreeBSD to even see the controller, I had to download the 3rd party drivers from the 3ware site and follow their instructions. The installation went very smoothly, I could clearly see the 1 x 76GB array & the 3.4TB array, which I successfully partitioned and labeled in the FreeBSD setup. I was required to recompile the kernel post installation so that FreeBSD would continue to see the array. There seemed to be no issues during any of the installation/post installation compile. However now it appears that I am missing a fair bit of space... or it is not reading correctly, I don't know exactly. This is the first time I have worked with volumes this large, certainly in FreeBSD. Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/da0s1a 496M 62M 394M 14% / devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev /dev/da1s1d 1.4T 42G 1.2T 3% /db /dev/da0s1e 496M 16K 456M 0% /tmp /dev/da0s1f 59G 1.8G 52G 3% /usr /dev/da0s1d 4.8G 115M 4.3G 3% /var devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /var/named/dev Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/da0s1a 507630 63730 403290 14% / devfs 1 1 0 100% /dev /dev/da1s1d 1466903074 43775300 1305775530 3% /db /dev/da0s1e 507630 16 467004 0% /tmp /dev/da0s1f 61443272 1846112 54681700 3% /usr /dev/da0s1d 5060654 117282 4538520 3% /var devfs 1 1 0 100% /var/named/dev As you can see /db is reading as 1.2T, whereas during the installation partition/label process this was at ~ 3.4T, which is what I am expecting. If anyone could provide some input as to where the rest has gone that would be greatly appreciated! Regards, Hartleigh Burton. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 05:22:14 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE0716A4EF for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 05:22:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7894E13C465 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 05:22:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot26.obsecurity.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCCD91A4D7C; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 22:21:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot26.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id AC952C1D2; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 01:22:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 01:22:13 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" Message-ID: <20070806052213.GA30845@rot26.obsecurity.org> References: <20070806042330.GA30245@rot26.obsecurity.org> <200708060449.l764nVxW031996@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200708060449.l764nVxW031996@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: portupgrade modifys EVERY +CONTENTS now? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 05:22:14 -0000 On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:49:31AM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > > > > On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 11:10:42PM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I've noticed that recent version(s?) of portupgrade seem to update > > > the +CONTENTS of *EVERY* package on my system, not just the ones it used to > > > actually make a difference to. Is there a way to revert to the old behaviour? > > > With 915 ports (WAS only around 600 before the recent Xorg upgrade) its a > > > killer. On my Soekris with a CF drive, and only 57 ports, its still killing > > > that CF chip. > > > > Please show us how you came to this conclusion. > > > > Kris > > > "script" output from a recent update : > > ---> Upgrade of sysutils/bsdstats started at: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:52:00 -0400 > ---> Upgrading 'bsdstats-5.3' to 'bsdstats-5.3_4' (sysutils/bsdstats) > OK? [yes] > ---> Build of sysutils/bsdstats started at: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:52:09 -0400 > ---> Building '/usr/ports/sysutils/bsdstats' > ===> Cleaning for bsdstats-5.3_4 > ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found > ===> Extracting for bsdstats-5.3_4 > ===> Patching for bsdstats-5.3_4 > ===> Configuring for bsdstats-5.3_4 > ---> Build of sysutils/bsdstats ended at: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:52:10 -0400 (cons > umed 00:00:00) > ---> Updating dependency info > ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/Hermes-1.3.3_2/+CONTENTS Is it actually writing to these files, or just examining them to see whether they need to be updated? Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 05:23:11 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95FD816A474 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 05:23:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alainfabry@belgacom.net) Received: from mailrelay005.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay005.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3594113C4CA for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 05:23:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alainfabry@belgacom.net) Received: from 135.195-245-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO belgacom.net) ([81.245.195.135]) by mailrelay005.isp.belgacom.be with ESMTP; 06 Aug 2007 07:23:09 +0200 Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 07:21:35 +0200 From: "Alain G. Fabry" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070806052135.GA60888@ducati-748.3rdrock.kicks-ass.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: boot problem after custom kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 05:23:11 -0000 Hello, After making some changes to my kernel and rebuilding (traditional way), my system does not boot anymore. I tried to boot from the GENERIC kernel following the instructions in the handbook. First 'unload kernel' followed by 'boot /boot/kernel.GENERIC/kernel', but it mentions that it cannot find the kernel. I'm trying to boot from the USB drive. If I go to the command prompt and verify currdev and loaddev are set to disk1s1a, which I believe is correct. When I boot the 'new' kernel, I get the mountroot prompt which asks me for a manual root filesystem. What can I do to boot my GENERIC kernel so I can rebuild from it and my system will boot normal again. Thanks, Alain From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 05:26:21 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A110416A420 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 05:26:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@Riderway.com) Received: from exhub015-2.exch015.msoutlookonline.net (exhub015-2.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8311E13C49D for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 05:26:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@Riderway.com) Received: from home.p6m7g8.net (68.55.4.133) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.0.730.1; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 22:26:20 -0700 Message-ID: <46B6B13D.2060108@riderway.com> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 01:27:25 -0400 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: Riderway Inc User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070703) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Alain G. Fabry" References: <20070806052135.GA60888@ducati-748.3rdrock.kicks-ass.net> In-Reply-To: <20070806052135.GA60888@ducati-748.3rdrock.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: boot problem after custom kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 05:26:21 -0000 Alain G. Fabry wrote: > First 'unload kernel' followed by 'boot /boot/kernel.GENERIC/kernel', but it mentions > that it cannot find the kernel. try, at loader prompt: unload kernel load /boot/kernel.old/kernel boot -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Philip M. Gollucci (philip@riderway.com) 323.219.4708 Senior System Admin - Riderway, Inc. http://riderway.com 1024D/EC88A0BF 0DE5 C55C 6BF3 B235 2DAB B89E 1324 9B4F EC88 A0BF Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 05:27:12 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE66F16A41A for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 05:27:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@Riderway.com) Received: from exhub015-2.exch015.msoutlookonline.net (exhub015-2.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A37C713C442 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 05:27:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@Riderway.com) Received: from home.p6m7g8.net (68.55.4.133) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.0.730.1; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 22:27:11 -0700 Message-ID: <46B6B171.5000708@riderway.com> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 01:28:17 -0400 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: Riderway Inc User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070703) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hartleigh Burton References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Large Volumes - 2.2TB missing... expecting 3.4TB! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 05:27:12 -0000 Hartleigh Burton wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I have installed FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE amd64 on a new boxen... and just > realized that I am missing just a 'little' bit of storage space ;) sudo sysinstall -- does it still read as 3.4 TB ? aka a df bug ? not likely -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Philip M. Gollucci (philip@riderway.com) 323.219.4708 Senior System Admin - Riderway, Inc. http://riderway.com 1024D/EC88A0BF 0DE5 C55C 6BF3 B235 2DAB B89E 1324 9B4F EC88 A0BF Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 05:28:43 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D375316A418 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 05:28:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakheshster@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BCBC13C459 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 05:28:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakheshster@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so1043413wxd for ; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 22:28:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:x-x-sender:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:from:sender; b=SgMHCTEmjWdyQ12BkkUuGYtYk77Vxu78Cxq+F9JVYKpcg6jJ2plim1RFJ/9ClfdjU894mfLmdRdfR9uD9tRupLyREUeMeWPahBMzXBXxrZKXDD/ZSqbj2FhXcKqh8OZLTnTk1xB0RWBqqa1/VJFgYTkPdsyu8zF8lrxJxCsRddk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:date:x-x-sender:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:from:sender; b=DtZrZZvwkyC4EGDJR6WPS9EzFOUtY+tGMYLG+YuM8hUoDbev10aMpJ/Sout3sKNnKAGMRfbPsYTvDZrQ3Z+f53A8i76aYLnr6DzUMN0IDu3ERxHi+I9VEWPKQ4hPT5Uzh5aa6frq5UrkWC9dFZR5/nxt5gbI604592eBKoV18uU= Received: by 10.70.80.6 with SMTP id d6mr9182590wxb.1186378122202; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 22:28:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.home.rakhesh.com ( [82.178.137.21]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v26sm6707223ele.2007.08.05.22.28.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 05 Aug 2007 22:28:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obelix.home.rakhesh.com (obelix.home.rakhesh.com [192.168.17.13]) by smtp.home.rakhesh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5FF811420; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 08:59:57 +0400 (GST) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 08:59:36 +0400 (GST) X-X-Sender: rakhesh@obelix.home.rakhesh.com To: "Arend P. van der Veen" In-Reply-To: <46B5E0F8.7050405@att.net> Message-ID: <20070806083111.F74284@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> References: <46B5E0F8.7050405@att.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Rakhesh Sasidharan Sender: Rakhesh Sasidharan Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsdb and cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 05:28:43 -0000 On Sun, 5 Aug 2007, Arend P. van der Veen wrote: > The approach that I had been using was: > > /usr/local/bin/cvsup -L 0 /usr/sup/supfile > /usr/local/sbin/portsdb -Uu > > This had worked great until the emacs22 update. Now portsdb crashes due to > the emacs entry in /etc/make.conf. However, I see very little chatter on the > lists about this. I have started to wonder if the bulk of the community may > be updating their ports differently. Upon some limited research I found that > I could use: > > /usr/local/bin/cvsup -L 0 /usr/sup/supfile > /usr/local/sbin/portsdb -Fu > > This work fine for me. I can then use tools such as pkg_version, pkg_delete, > portinstall and portupgrade without any problems. > > My open ended question is what does the rest of the community do to update > their ports collection? > I don't run portsdb at all. :) What I figured from the portsdb manpages is that if you don't run it manually then it gets run upon using one of the portupgrade tools. I don't mind the 30s or so delay that causes and so I don't run portsdb manually. During my first few days with FreeBSD, however, I used to run ''portsdb -Fu''. My understanding is that that would fetch the INDEX-6 and update INDEX-6.db (since I am on FreeBSD 6.x) but I don't see why I should do this coz the INDEX files are updated when I update the ports tree anyways! (If I have understood this incorrectly, someone please correct me). I tried ''portsdb -Uu'' just once. To see what it does. Took a long time and so I never tried it again. From the manpage I understand that it creates/ updates the INDEX files by running the ''make index'' command, but the reasoning behind that didn't make sense to me ... So that's my story. Regards, Rakhesh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 05:29:35 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DE8F16A496 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 05:29:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfraser@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1174113C45B for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 05:29:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfraser@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f1so871954rvb for ; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 22:29:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DLRPav7BxQYkrmvodjkTV68rZ+Nw/QibHE68kkXZ6gwKGcwGhU9Uz9vpMqdpxbbxjYrQtAeK0fgNK9y/J5JxRTCMaO7np13yGaCrXbJBR4DBSgIctUV5t8DNSjjTmmjX+OMirRoaoOB1YxRNv31gSJfmdQjW50ofx8F+oNfZDl8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=YuNC+i3i6+XeZ5r6IKBu2YYtE1op5aKoRCUemJ+mxpFeyDhU33Lcweentr0CZYQWzk3SjsNudsOTc8GCnbN3n8IschGaF601jWtocGQlL7LYJwCc06YIS4Hm2fe5kcWZi865fk7V4BDkb2b4lDFi+R8NJWP14rRsw6c0m75+kmM= Received: by 10.141.209.7 with SMTP id l7mr2001236rvq.1186378174390; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 22:29:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.72.1? ( [58.174.74.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f28sm11070025rvb.2007.08.05.22.29.32 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 05 Aug 2007 22:29:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46B6B1AA.9010905@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 15:29:14 +1000 From: Paul Fraser User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Alain G. Fabry" References: <20070806052135.GA60888@ducati-748.3rdrock.kicks-ass.net> In-Reply-To: <20070806052135.GA60888@ducati-748.3rdrock.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: boot problem after custom kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 05:29:35 -0000 Alain G. Fabry wrote: > First 'unload kernel' followed by 'boot /boot/kernel.GENERIC/kernel', but it mentions > that it cannot find the kernel. > > What can I do to boot my GENERIC kernel so I can rebuild from it and my system will boot > normal again. Hi Alain, Try replacing 'kernel.GENERIC' with 'kernel.old' in your example. If you don't remember actually making a copy of your kernel and naming it kernel.GENERIC, you'll be more likely to succeed with kernel.old. -- Regards, Paul Fraser // Independent Technical Consultant // Ph: +61 405 341 905 // furyc0de.net This correspondence and any related attachments are confidential. Distribution, reproduction, or release (public domain or otherwise) without the author's prior written consent is STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. Failure to distribute any of the aforementioned without this footer (intact and unmodified) is also STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. Failure to abide by these terms and conditions can result in legal action. If you have received this correspondence in error, or believe any of these terms have been breached, you are requested to contact the author immediately and take steps to destroy all copies in your possession. PGP KeyID: 0x64E635B1 Keyserver: pgp.mit.edu:11371 Key fingerprint: CDA3 0797 68B9 0EC1 D4D3 A7B9 D7D7 4924 64E6 35B1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 05:45:32 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2D9E16A420 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 05:45:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hburton@mraentertainment.com) Received: from mail.mraentertainment.com (243-145-222-203.static.techex.net.au [203.222.145.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A38C13C461 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 05:45:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hburton@mraentertainment.com) Received: (qmail 63385 invoked by uid 89); 6 Aug 2007 05:45:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.187?) (hburton@mraentertainment.com@192.168.1.187) by mickey.mraentertainment with ESMTPA; 6 Aug 2007 05:45:30 -0000 In-Reply-To: <46B6B171.5000708@riderway.com> References: <46B6B171.5000708@riderway.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Message-Id: <1918FC18-18E2-4163-A78A-6EA4A807BCE5@mraentertainment.com> From: Hartleigh Burton Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 15:45:09 +1000 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "Philip M. Gollucci" Subject: Re: Large Volumes - 2.2TB missing... expecting 3.4TB! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 05:45:32 -0000 OK, in the FDISK Partition Editor da1 reads as 3576219MB. So that looks to be ok and around what I am expecting. In the Disklabel Editor da1s1 has 0MB free, and da1s1d is the only da1s1 label with a size of 1444GB. Regards, Hartleigh Burton On 06/08/2007, at 3:28 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > sudo sysinstall -- does it still read as 3.4 TB ? aka a df bug ? > not likely From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 06:01:58 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350AA16A41B for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 06:01:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: from vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (vjofn-pt.tunnel.tserv1.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:ffff::5e5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4BF613C469 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 06:01:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: from himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (cpe-68-175-8-11.hvc.res.rr.com [68.175.8.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l7661vho064782; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 02:01:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (localhost.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com [127.0.0.1]) by himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l7661p7A054337; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 02:01:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: (from tbohml@localhost) by himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.13.8/8.13.6/Submit) id l7661pfS054336; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 02:01:51 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tbohml) From: "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" Message-Id: <200708060601.l7661pfS054336@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> To: kris@obsecurity.org (Kris Kennaway) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 02:01:51 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20070806052213.GA30845@rot26.obsecurity.org> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL8] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: portupgrade modifys EVERY +CONTENTS now? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 06:01:58 -0000 > > On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:49:31AM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 11:10:42PM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I've noticed that recent version(s?) of portupgrade seem to update > > > > the +CONTENTS of *EVERY* package on my system, not just the ones it used to > > > > actually make a difference to. Is there a way to revert to the old behaviour? > > > > With 915 ports (WAS only around 600 before the recent Xorg upgrade) its a > > > > killer. On my Soekris with a CF drive, and only 57 ports, its still killing > > > > that CF chip. > > > > > > Please show us how you came to this conclusion. > > > > > > Kris > > > > > "script" output from a recent update : > > > > ---> Upgrade of sysutils/bsdstats started at: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:52:00 -0400 > > ---> Upgrading 'bsdstats-5.3' to 'bsdstats-5.3_4' (sysutils/bsdstats) > > OK? [yes] > > ---> Build of sysutils/bsdstats started at: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:52:09 -0400 > > ---> Building '/usr/ports/sysutils/bsdstats' > > ===> Cleaning for bsdstats-5.3_4 > > ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found > > ===> Extracting for bsdstats-5.3_4 > > ===> Patching for bsdstats-5.3_4 > > ===> Configuring for bsdstats-5.3_4 > > ---> Build of sysutils/bsdstats ended at: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:52:10 -0400 (cons > > umed 00:00:00) > > ---> Updating dependency info > > ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/Hermes-1.3.3_2/+CONTENTS > > Is it actually writing to these files, or just examining them to see > whether they need to be updated? > > Kris > I was truthfully only going by what I believed it was saying, that it was really modifying them. I upgraded fetchyahoo tonite after I emailed this, and if I do an "ls -lt" in /var/db/pkg I see : -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 15891456 Aug 6 00:59 pkgdb.db drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 fetchyahoo-2.10.9 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-Compress-Zlib-2.005 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-Crypt-SSLeay-0.56 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-IO-Compress-Zlib-2.005 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-libwww-5.805 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 openssl-0.9.8e_1 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-Authen-SASL-2.10_1 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-Digest-MD5-2.36 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-MIME-Tools-5.420_1,2 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-Net-1.21,1 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.005 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-Digest-HMAC-1.01 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-GSSAPI-0.24 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-HTML-Parser-3.56 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-HTML-Tagset-3.10 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-IO-Compress-Base-2.005 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-Convert-BinHex-1.119 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-Digest-1.15 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-IO-stringy-2.110 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-MIME-Base64-3.07 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-Mail-Tools-1.74 (etc) drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:58 bsdstats-5.3_4 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:58 Hermes-1.3.3_2 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:58 ImageMagick-6.3.3.5_1 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:58 ORBit-0.5.17_3 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:58 ORBit2-2.14.8 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:58 OpenEXR-1.4.0 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:58 OpenSP-1.5.2 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:58 Xaw3d-1.5E_2 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:58 aalib-1.4.r5_3 I thought the timestamp of a directory only changes if a file was added or modified in the directory. If I do the "ls -lt */\+CONTENTS", I see : -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2386 Aug 6 00:59 fetchyahoo-2.10.9/+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1113 Aug 6 00:59 xset-1.0.2/+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 976 Aug 6 00:59 xsetmode-1.0.0/+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1003 Aug 6 00:59 xsetpointer-1.0.0/+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1204 Aug 6 00:59 xsetroot-1.0.1/+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1597 Aug 6 00:59 xsm-1.0.1/+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1149 Aug 6 00:59 xstdcmap-1.0.1/+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 5124 Aug 6 00:59 xterm-228/+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1157 Aug 6 00:59 xtrans-1.0.3/+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3097 Aug 6 00:59 xtrap-1.0.2/+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 6643 Aug 6 00:59 xv-3.10a_7/+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 4629 Aug 6 00:59 xvattr-1.3_3/+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 414 Aug 6 00:59 xvid-1.1.3,1/+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1689 Aug 6 00:59 xvidtune-1.0.1/+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1017 Aug 6 00:59 xvinfo-1.0.1/+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1104 Aug 6 00:59 xwd-1.0.1/+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1149 Aug 6 00:59 xwininfo-1.0.2/+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 5062 Aug 6 00:59 xword-0.07_3/+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 777 Aug 6 00:59 xwud-1.0.1/+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3627 Aug 6 00:59 yasm-0.6.1/+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 349 Aug 6 00:59 zh-chm2html-0.1a/+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 441 Aug 6 00:59 zip-2.32/+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 78239 Aug 6 00:59 zsh-4.3.4_1/+CONTENTS (etc) -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 301 Aug 6 00:58 bsdstats-5.3_4/+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2156 Aug 6 00:58 Hermes-1.3.3_2/+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 64643 Aug 6 00:58 ImageMagick-6.3.3.5_1/+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 8741 Aug 6 00:58 ORBit-0.5.17_3/+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 7005 Aug 6 00:58 ORBit2-2.14.8/+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 10787 Aug 6 00:58 OpenEXR-1.4.0/+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 18170 Aug 6 00:58 OpenSP-1.5.2/+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 10272 Aug 6 00:58 Xaw3d-1.5E_2/+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 20576 Aug 6 00:58 aalib-1.4.r5_3/+CONTENTS So I'm still going with the file being modified. I guess even if its opening the file, reading it, and then writing it back out unmodified, its still disk operations that the CF especially can't handle. (Then again, the laptop isn't doing too well. Aug 6 01:45:53 himinbjorg smartd[727]: Device: /dev/ad0, 2 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors Aug 6 01:45:53 himinbjorg smartd[727]: Device: /dev/ad0, 3 Offline uncorrectable sectors (Thats only started too since it was pounded during Xorg upgrade) I still really would only like it to touch the files it REALLY needs to. Thanks, Tuc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 06:07:20 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B1416A41B for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 06:07:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5EEF13C461 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 06:07:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b27so1573950fka for ; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 23:07:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=U9iHDzrLm6eu7xeTkSwA8gyrkOyUh4hItY27eUQ3LfPotfAinOUPCROM0aLnOv+VCu3CfICISF560sEJZoimc8dsaUS8O4WMQde10YXGlpI2aOkjk/2md2fo1IZZK/V2BoSW+LsrcHLdC0kSFRoFV0oGhv6lt4UAIBpWevXwPKs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=B1Vy4gwjBgJBT04KsC1PWHcaXlTa5FAKIrtrgvdEn9pQytToHdH7aSg6gfSC8zpTNuQHufK8xoh1MiAJTMLmX1ri+dSxBUopNjieNs4b25XjIy3rLiaNCY6mQUI9i1RPB8mnhgaeosmp9fEfsmjcKzP9rJ2USSFbWG6NKrBeK5A= Received: by 10.82.112.3 with SMTP id k3mr5116973buc.1186380438222; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 23:07:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.185.5 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 23:07:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 01:07:18 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Hartleigh Burton" In-Reply-To: <1918FC18-18E2-4163-A78A-6EA4A807BCE5@mraentertainment.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <46B6B171.5000708@riderway.com> <1918FC18-18E2-4163-A78A-6EA4A807BCE5@mraentertainment.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Philip M. Gollucci" Subject: Re: Large Volumes - 2.2TB missing... expecting 3.4TB! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 06:07:20 -0000 On 06/08/07, Hartleigh Burton wrote: > OK, in the FDISK Partition Editor da1 reads as 3576219MB. So that > looks to be ok and around what I am expecting. > > In the Disklabel Editor da1s1 has 0MB free, and da1s1d is the only > da1s1 label with a size of 1444GB. > The output of % bsdlabel da1s1 might be very enlightening here. As an aside, you might spend some time learning the command line utilities. % man 8 fdisk % man 8 bsdlabel -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 06:17:26 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6610B16A417 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 06:17:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB91913C461 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 06:17:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b27so1576202fka for ; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 23:17:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=M6Xnl+Vvy3nv8LHbxUguDi7q5QsSJUV4z0Ijavw456wvWWq6zgeHiYTje+eGhdy11g4KpxTBHf27s71qDrDoWFJDIvYs/LjBJ9laHg1Y79BXi2WI9e9N6nEiywqwFMPpGXmNjKb9j31sb4I3YS+oVnH/ipoG5B8Xiqr7ix/YLNc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=S34KWX4lRZvilJdNlRGsWhEuleHikGR8xoIwBLSRaw2X/KubwCq34FVRi2nC8Mh1zGBq4jVNJAQXKtxeFW5/AmRYTKcGwS9Oq6ypBoQi0bYqF/AVYzlAtoSk4I1FGCPv5O1EhqlGyP9THx3WBSeTI3E3LIcfT7QYLR4lkofvUDU= Received: by 10.82.114.3 with SMTP id m3mr744192buc.1186381044686; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 23:17:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.185.5 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 23:17:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 01:17:24 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Rolf G Nielsen" In-Reply-To: <46B65DCB.8020307@lazlarlyricon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <46B65DCB.8020307@lazlarlyricon.com> Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: USB mouse issues. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 06:17:26 -0000 On 05/08/07, Rolf G Nielsen wrote: > Hi, > > My new USB mouse (a Logitech G5) works fine both in the console (with > moused) and under X (both with moused and directly)... For the most part... > However, once in a while it just dies (the lights indicating the DPI > setting on top and the lights underneath it goes off and it stops > responding). > Since, according to the ehci man page, the USB 2.0 driver is quite > buggy, I tried disabling it, but the problem didn't go away. > I've also tried connecting the mouse to different USB connectors without > luck. > > Every time it happens I get two lines in the /var/log/messages file: > In my case an old microsoft balless usb mouse did just the same thing. Would work for 15 seconds to 4 or 5 days and then not work*. Replugging would usually make it come back. Throwing it away worked best. Never had any other usb problems on that machine. *Never gave any error messages either, just went dark. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 06:22:07 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11F6416A41A for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 06:22:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96A6413C4A3 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 06:22:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b27so1577077fka for ; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 23:22:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eAbs3HHrGustoxOSbukHqlxELdDOROUMYHvijWUZH0Ml0XjprWKVuH5VioBj/w/yC+y1A09qE3/On52MiqFNhwlytJwTXYW4oPWSmMfAqWgs/QgvnTiHRM/mEG7rTbqB0ElAHzkZVbBNA6EXelEgmeJ+6GVgzNQGeM/s3UK3k3g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=KExpen/+fKkbmJA9fM1tbM7nyyZYwO8X+7YsgIjnBa0NIgSCP+oAEAecPMudnCJ375dQi5O4qJknJo4si9qgiW+KMvoPH7h6TJaLkfI+cEY2YDoQsetzK0JNeEIbPUE9Wv5+PtI2AbWFcuMaWc5lnyFeNnInecwC4dl8fbEPjHM= Received: by 10.82.108.9 with SMTP id g9mr5107839buc.1186381325069; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 23:22:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.185.5 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 23:22:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 01:22:05 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Victor Sudakov" In-Reply-To: <20070806025614.GA21368@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070724115401.GA1355@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20070806025614.GA21368@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: dump -L X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 06:22:07 -0000 On 05/08/07, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Victor Sudakov wrote: > > > > I always use "dump -L" to dump a live filesystem. > > However, when I restore the dump, I sometimes get messages like > > "foo.txt (inode 12345) not found on tape" or > > "expected next file 12345, got 23456" > > > > I thought this should _never_ happen when dumping a snapshot. > > > > What is it? > > Does nobody know the answer, or am I the only one experiencing the > problem? I don't know the answer, but I get essentially the same behaviour. I have never seen any data loss, though. I just tended to assume it was either harmless or the world was going to end, neither of which cases I could seem to rule out definitively. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 06:29:39 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2DC216A420 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 06:29:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hburton@mraentertainment.com) Received: from mail.mraentertainment.com (243-145-222-203.static.techex.net.au [203.222.145.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A1F413C491 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 06:29:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hburton@mraentertainment.com) Received: (qmail 67432 invoked by uid 89); 6 Aug 2007 06:29:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.187?) (hburton@mraentertainment.com@192.168.1.187) by mickey.mraentertainment with ESMTPA; 6 Aug 2007 06:29:37 -0000 In-Reply-To: References: <46B6B171.5000708@riderway.com> <1918FC18-18E2-4163-A78A-6EA4A807BCE5@mraentertainment.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Message-Id: <98148EE5-2AE8-4EF3-8CF3-225CAF8C07C9@mraentertainment.com> From: Hartleigh Burton Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 16:29:15 +1000 To: illoai@gmail.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large Volumes - 2.2TB missing... expecting 3.4TB! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 06:29:39 -0000 Thanks for the tip. # /dev/da1s1: 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] c: 3029130401 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit d: 3029130401 0 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28528 Unfortunately for me, I do not really know what I am looking at here. Regards, Hartleigh Burton On 06/08/2007, at 4:07 PM, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > On 06/08/07, Hartleigh Burton wrote: >> OK, in the FDISK Partition Editor da1 reads as 3576219MB. So that >> looks to be ok and around what I am expecting. >> >> In the Disklabel Editor da1s1 has 0MB free, and da1s1d is the only >> da1s1 label with a size of 1444GB. >> > > The output of > % bsdlabel da1s1 > might be very enlightening here. > > As an aside, you might spend some time learning the > command line utilities. > % man 8 fdisk > % man 8 bsdlabel > > -- > -- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 06:42:21 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CDB216A420 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 06:42:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14BE113C48E for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 06:42:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot26.obsecurity.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056691A4D7C; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 23:41:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot26.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 207B5C1D2; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 02:42:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 02:42:20 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" Message-ID: <20070806064220.GA31573@rot26.obsecurity.org> References: <20070806052213.GA30845@rot26.obsecurity.org> <200708060601.l7661pfS054336@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200708060601.l7661pfS054336@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: portupgrade modifys EVERY +CONTENTS now? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 06:42:21 -0000 On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 02:01:51AM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:49:31AM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 11:10:42PM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I've noticed that recent version(s?) of portupgrade seem to update > > > > > the +CONTENTS of *EVERY* package on my system, not just the ones it used to > > > > > actually make a difference to. Is there a way to revert to the old behaviour? > > > > > With 915 ports (WAS only around 600 before the recent Xorg upgrade) its a > > > > > killer. On my Soekris with a CF drive, and only 57 ports, its still killing > > > > > that CF chip. > > > > > > > > Please show us how you came to this conclusion. > > > > > > > > Kris > > > > > > > "script" output from a recent update : > > > > > > ---> Upgrade of sysutils/bsdstats started at: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:52:00 -0400 > > > ---> Upgrading 'bsdstats-5.3' to 'bsdstats-5.3_4' (sysutils/bsdstats) > > > OK? [yes] > > > ---> Build of sysutils/bsdstats started at: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:52:09 -0400 > > > ---> Building '/usr/ports/sysutils/bsdstats' > > > ===> Cleaning for bsdstats-5.3_4 > > > ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found > > > ===> Extracting for bsdstats-5.3_4 > > > ===> Patching for bsdstats-5.3_4 > > > ===> Configuring for bsdstats-5.3_4 > > > ---> Build of sysutils/bsdstats ended at: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:52:10 -0400 (cons > > > umed 00:00:00) > > > ---> Updating dependency info > > > ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/Hermes-1.3.3_2/+CONTENTS > > > > Is it actually writing to these files, or just examining them to see > > whether they need to be updated? > > > > Kris > > > I was truthfully only going by what I believed it was saying, that > it was really modifying them. > > I upgraded fetchyahoo tonite after I emailed this, and if I do an > "ls -lt" in /var/db/pkg I see : > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 15891456 Aug 6 00:59 pkgdb.db > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 fetchyahoo-2.10.9 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-Compress-Zlib-2.005 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-Crypt-SSLeay-0.56 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-IO-Compress-Zlib-2.005 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-libwww-5.805 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 openssl-0.9.8e_1 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-Authen-SASL-2.10_1 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-Digest-MD5-2.36 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-MIME-Tools-5.420_1,2 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-Net-1.21,1 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.005 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-Digest-HMAC-1.01 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-GSSAPI-0.24 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-HTML-Parser-3.56 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-HTML-Tagset-3.10 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-IO-Compress-Base-2.005 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-Convert-BinHex-1.119 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-Digest-1.15 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-IO-stringy-2.110 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-MIME-Base64-3.07 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-Mail-Tools-1.74 > > (etc) > > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:58 bsdstats-5.3_4 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:58 Hermes-1.3.3_2 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:58 ImageMagick-6.3.3.5_1 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:58 ORBit-0.5.17_3 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:58 ORBit2-2.14.8 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:58 OpenEXR-1.4.0 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:58 OpenSP-1.5.2 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:58 Xaw3d-1.5E_2 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:58 aalib-1.4.r5_3 > > I thought the timestamp of a directory only changes if a > file was added or modified in the directory. > > If I do the "ls -lt */\+CONTENTS", I see : > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2386 Aug 6 00:59 fetchyahoo-2.10.9/+CONTENTS > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1113 Aug 6 00:59 xset-1.0.2/+CONTENTS > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 976 Aug 6 00:59 xsetmode-1.0.0/+CONTENTS > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1003 Aug 6 00:59 xsetpointer-1.0.0/+CONTENTS > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1204 Aug 6 00:59 xsetroot-1.0.1/+CONTENTS > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1597 Aug 6 00:59 xsm-1.0.1/+CONTENTS > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1149 Aug 6 00:59 xstdcmap-1.0.1/+CONTENTS > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 5124 Aug 6 00:59 xterm-228/+CONTENTS > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1157 Aug 6 00:59 xtrans-1.0.3/+CONTENTS > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3097 Aug 6 00:59 xtrap-1.0.2/+CONTENTS > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 6643 Aug 6 00:59 xv-3.10a_7/+CONTENTS > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 4629 Aug 6 00:59 xvattr-1.3_3/+CONTENTS > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 414 Aug 6 00:59 xvid-1.1.3,1/+CONTENTS > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1689 Aug 6 00:59 xvidtune-1.0.1/+CONTENTS > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1017 Aug 6 00:59 xvinfo-1.0.1/+CONTENTS > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1104 Aug 6 00:59 xwd-1.0.1/+CONTENTS > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1149 Aug 6 00:59 xwininfo-1.0.2/+CONTENTS > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 5062 Aug 6 00:59 xword-0.07_3/+CONTENTS > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 777 Aug 6 00:59 xwud-1.0.1/+CONTENTS > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3627 Aug 6 00:59 yasm-0.6.1/+CONTENTS > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 349 Aug 6 00:59 zh-chm2html-0.1a/+CONTENTS > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 441 Aug 6 00:59 zip-2.32/+CONTENTS > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 78239 Aug 6 00:59 zsh-4.3.4_1/+CONTENTS > > (etc) > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 301 Aug 6 00:58 bsdstats-5.3_4/+CONTENTS > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2156 Aug 6 00:58 Hermes-1.3.3_2/+CONTENTS > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 64643 Aug 6 00:58 ImageMagick-6.3.3.5_1/+CONTENTS > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 8741 Aug 6 00:58 ORBit-0.5.17_3/+CONTENTS > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 7005 Aug 6 00:58 ORBit2-2.14.8/+CONTENTS > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 10787 Aug 6 00:58 OpenEXR-1.4.0/+CONTENTS > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 18170 Aug 6 00:58 OpenSP-1.5.2/+CONTENTS > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 10272 Aug 6 00:58 Xaw3d-1.5E_2/+CONTENTS > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 20576 Aug 6 00:58 aalib-1.4.r5_3/+CONTENTS > > So I'm still going with the file being modified. I guess even if > its opening the file, reading it, and then writing it back out unmodified, > its still disk operations that the CF especially can't handle. (Then again, > the laptop isn't doing too well. > > Aug 6 01:45:53 himinbjorg smartd[727]: Device: /dev/ad0, 2 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors > Aug 6 01:45:53 himinbjorg smartd[727]: Device: /dev/ad0, 3 Offline uncorrectable sectors > > (Thats only started too since it was pounded during Xorg upgrade) > > I still really would only like it to touch the files it REALLY > needs to. OK, talk to the maintainer. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 06:55:45 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5409F16A417 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 06:55:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: from vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (vjofn-pt.tunnel.tserv1.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:ffff::5e5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE3E13C46C for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 06:55:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: from himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (cpe-68-175-8-11.hvc.res.rr.com [68.175.8.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l766teho065387; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 02:55:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (localhost.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com [127.0.0.1]) by himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l766tYbh055102; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 02:55:34 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: (from tbohml@localhost) by himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.13.8/8.13.6/Submit) id l766tYah055101; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 02:55:34 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tbohml) From: "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" Message-Id: <200708060655.l766tYah055101@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> To: kris@obsecurity.org (Kris Kennaway) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 02:55:34 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20070806064220.GA31573@rot26.obsecurity.org> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL8] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: portupgrade modifys EVERY +CONTENTS now? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 06:55:45 -0000 > > On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 02:01:51AM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:49:31AM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 11:10:42PM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > I've noticed that recent version(s?) of portupgrade seem to update > > > > > > the +CONTENTS of *EVERY* package on my system, not just the ones it used to > > > > > > actually make a difference to. Is there a way to revert to the old behaviour? > > > > > > With 915 ports (WAS only around 600 before the recent Xorg upgrade) its a > > > > > > killer. On my Soekris with a CF drive, and only 57 ports, its still killing > > > > > > that CF chip. > > > > > > > > > > Please show us how you came to this conclusion. > > > > > > > > > > Kris > > > > > > > > > "script" output from a recent update : > > > > > > > > ---> Upgrade of sysutils/bsdstats started at: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:52:00 -0400 > > > > ---> Upgrading 'bsdstats-5.3' to 'bsdstats-5.3_4' (sysutils/bsdstats) > > > > OK? [yes] > > > > ---> Build of sysutils/bsdstats started at: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:52:09 -0400 > > > > ---> Building '/usr/ports/sysutils/bsdstats' > > > > ===> Cleaning for bsdstats-5.3_4 > > > > ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found > > > > ===> Extracting for bsdstats-5.3_4 > > > > ===> Patching for bsdstats-5.3_4 > > > > ===> Configuring for bsdstats-5.3_4 > > > > ---> Build of sysutils/bsdstats ended at: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:52:10 -0400 (cons > > > > umed 00:00:00) > > > > ---> Updating dependency info > > > > ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/Hermes-1.3.3_2/+CONTENTS > > > > > > Is it actually writing to these files, or just examining them to see > > > whether they need to be updated? > > > > > > Kris > > > > > I was truthfully only going by what I believed it was saying, that > > it was really modifying them. > > > > I upgraded fetchyahoo tonite after I emailed this, and if I do an > > "ls -lt" in /var/db/pkg I see : > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 15891456 Aug 6 00:59 pkgdb.db > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 fetchyahoo-2.10.9 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-Compress-Zlib-2.005 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-Crypt-SSLeay-0.56 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-IO-Compress-Zlib-2.005 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-libwww-5.805 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 openssl-0.9.8e_1 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-Authen-SASL-2.10_1 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-Digest-MD5-2.36 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-MIME-Tools-5.420_1,2 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-Net-1.21,1 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.005 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-Digest-HMAC-1.01 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-GSSAPI-0.24 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-HTML-Parser-3.56 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-HTML-Tagset-3.10 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-IO-Compress-Base-2.005 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-Convert-BinHex-1.119 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-Digest-1.15 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-IO-stringy-2.110 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-MIME-Base64-3.07 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:59 p5-Mail-Tools-1.74 > > > > (etc) > > > > > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:58 bsdstats-5.3_4 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:58 Hermes-1.3.3_2 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:58 ImageMagick-6.3.3.5_1 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:58 ORBit-0.5.17_3 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:58 ORBit2-2.14.8 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:58 OpenEXR-1.4.0 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:58 OpenSP-1.5.2 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:58 Xaw3d-1.5E_2 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 6 00:58 aalib-1.4.r5_3 > > > > I thought the timestamp of a directory only changes if a > > file was added or modified in the directory. > > > > If I do the "ls -lt */\+CONTENTS", I see : > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2386 Aug 6 00:59 fetchyahoo-2.10.9/+CONTENTS > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1113 Aug 6 00:59 xset-1.0.2/+CONTENTS > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 976 Aug 6 00:59 xsetmode-1.0.0/+CONTENTS > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1003 Aug 6 00:59 xsetpointer-1.0.0/+CONTENTS > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1204 Aug 6 00:59 xsetroot-1.0.1/+CONTENTS > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1597 Aug 6 00:59 xsm-1.0.1/+CONTENTS > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1149 Aug 6 00:59 xstdcmap-1.0.1/+CONTENTS > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 5124 Aug 6 00:59 xterm-228/+CONTENTS > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1157 Aug 6 00:59 xtrans-1.0.3/+CONTENTS > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3097 Aug 6 00:59 xtrap-1.0.2/+CONTENTS > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 6643 Aug 6 00:59 xv-3.10a_7/+CONTENTS > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 4629 Aug 6 00:59 xvattr-1.3_3/+CONTENTS > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 414 Aug 6 00:59 xvid-1.1.3,1/+CONTENTS > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1689 Aug 6 00:59 xvidtune-1.0.1/+CONTENTS > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1017 Aug 6 00:59 xvinfo-1.0.1/+CONTENTS > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1104 Aug 6 00:59 xwd-1.0.1/+CONTENTS > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1149 Aug 6 00:59 xwininfo-1.0.2/+CONTENTS > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 5062 Aug 6 00:59 xword-0.07_3/+CONTENTS > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 777 Aug 6 00:59 xwud-1.0.1/+CONTENTS > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3627 Aug 6 00:59 yasm-0.6.1/+CONTENTS > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 349 Aug 6 00:59 zh-chm2html-0.1a/+CONTENTS > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 441 Aug 6 00:59 zip-2.32/+CONTENTS > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 78239 Aug 6 00:59 zsh-4.3.4_1/+CONTENTS > > > > (etc) > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 301 Aug 6 00:58 bsdstats-5.3_4/+CONTENTS > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2156 Aug 6 00:58 Hermes-1.3.3_2/+CONTENTS > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 64643 Aug 6 00:58 ImageMagick-6.3.3.5_1/+CONTENTS > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 8741 Aug 6 00:58 ORBit-0.5.17_3/+CONTENTS > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 7005 Aug 6 00:58 ORBit2-2.14.8/+CONTENTS > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 10787 Aug 6 00:58 OpenEXR-1.4.0/+CONTENTS > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 18170 Aug 6 00:58 OpenSP-1.5.2/+CONTENTS > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 10272 Aug 6 00:58 Xaw3d-1.5E_2/+CONTENTS > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 20576 Aug 6 00:58 aalib-1.4.r5_3/+CONTENTS > > > > So I'm still going with the file being modified. I guess even if > > its opening the file, reading it, and then writing it back out unmodified, > > its still disk operations that the CF especially can't handle. (Then again, > > the laptop isn't doing too well. > > > > Aug 6 01:45:53 himinbjorg smartd[727]: Device: /dev/ad0, 2 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors > > Aug 6 01:45:53 himinbjorg smartd[727]: Device: /dev/ad0, 3 Offline uncorrectable sectors > > > > (Thats only started too since it was pounded during Xorg upgrade) > > > > I still really would only like it to touch the files it REALLY > > needs to. > > OK, talk to the maintainer. > Ok. But I part of my question to people , and reason for posting it here, is the old "Is anyone else seeing this". When/if you use portupgrade, does it do the same for you? Or is it just something that I happened some how to inherit on atleast 2 of my machines? Thanks, Tuc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 06:56:07 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB3016A469 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 06:56:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3578213C4D5 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 06:56:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b27so1584241fka for ; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 23:56:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rfwbTdDWOjWQSGaNHuiwNS7GmQNNaDePu0UC56LSHcUytVNgwj2HT3F/bon8LNtKtliikzIoRQxFBqFQ8AabC4KLRP0BHh6zR7V5VnTYeAiOJo6pa8SvZ9eokDo2rjHCQbPmo0W2I+IGAeqTWSYh5Y7p3gM+xhtFjjdlzp0nQWY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=A/tyjG8MMwRJ7ndPM9HsLdYnYNhFhqM9wRhEhx5u8FaXkGTRYgoZd9We97dZaod5n+h48fwLrHDSPYg/gFW1trKzAf1znJ2ubSJ6PWuqJuTWJvPQ/lcIvEciyipAy4/mHaUMVDb77YkqlScPu8kcXTu5SYQSgMrxtWp8eHuD/9I= Received: by 10.82.178.11 with SMTP id a11mr5140842buf.1186383362827; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 23:56:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.185.5 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 23:56:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 01:56:02 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Hartleigh Burton" In-Reply-To: <98148EE5-2AE8-4EF3-8CF3-225CAF8C07C9@mraentertainment.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <46B6B171.5000708@riderway.com> <1918FC18-18E2-4163-A78A-6EA4A807BCE5@mraentertainment.com> <98148EE5-2AE8-4EF3-8CF3-225CAF8C07C9@mraentertainment.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large Volumes - 2.2TB missing... expecting 3.4TB! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 06:56:07 -0000 On 06/08/07, Hartleigh Burton wrote: > > Thanks for the tip. > > # /dev/da1s1: > 8 partitions: > # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] > c: 3029130401 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, > don't edit > d: 3029130401 0 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28528 > > Unfortunately for me, I do not really know what I am looking at here. > I just noticed from man 8 bsdlabel: COMPATIBILITY Due to the use of an u_int32_t to store the number of sectors, BSD labels are restricted to a maximum of 2^32-1 sectors. This usually means 2TB of disk space. Larger disks should be partitioned using another method such as gpt(8). I suspect this applies to amd64. man 8 fdisk makes no mention of data size problems, but I would suspect it as well. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 07:12:12 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D895A16A418 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 07:12:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alainfabry@belgacom.net) Received: from mailrelay001.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay001.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 758A013C45B for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 07:12:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alainfabry@belgacom.net) Received: from 135.195-245-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO belgacom.net) ([81.245.195.135]) by mailrelay001.isp.belgacom.be with ESMTP; 06 Aug 2007 09:12:10 +0200 Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 09:10:35 +0200 From: "Alain G. Fabry" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070806071035.GA61219@ducati-748.3rdrock.kicks-ass.net> References: <20070806052135.GA60888@ducati-748.3rdrock.kicks-ass.net> <46B6B1AA.9010905@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46B6B1AA.9010905@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: boot problem after custom kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 07:12:12 -0000 On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 03:29:14PM +1000, Paul Fraser wrote: > Alain G. Fabry wrote: > >First 'unload kernel' followed by 'boot /boot/kernel.GENERIC/kernel', but > >it mentions > >that it cannot find the kernel. > > > > > > >What can I do to boot my GENERIC kernel so I can rebuild from it and my > >system will boot > >normal again. > > Hi Alain, > > Try replacing 'kernel.GENERIC' with 'kernel.old' in your example. If you > don't remember actually making a copy of your kernel and naming it > kernel.GENERIC, you'll be more likely to succeed with kernel.old. > > -- > Regards, > > Paul Fraser // Independent Technical Consultant // Ph: +61 405 341 905 > // furyc0de.net > > This correspondence and any related attachments are confidential. > Distribution, reproduction, or release (public domain or otherwise) > without the author's prior written consent is STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. > Failure to distribute any of the aforementioned without this footer > (intact and unmodified) is also STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. Failure to abide by > these terms and conditions can result in legal action. > > If you have received this correspondence in error, or believe any of > these terms have been breached, you are requested to contact the author > immediately and take steps to destroy all copies in your possession. > Thanks, it works. Somehow I though since the old seems to be in italics that you needed to change it with the old kernel name (which in my case was GENERIC) Back up and running. Alain > PGP KeyID: 0x64E635B1 > Keyserver: pgp.mit.edu:11371 > Key fingerprint: CDA3 0797 68B9 0EC1 D4D3 A7B9 D7D7 4924 64E6 35B1 > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 07:19:01 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF7316A468 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 07:19:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (relay2.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D4FA13C47E for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 07:18:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru) X-Virus-Scanned: by Dr.Web (R) daemon for FreeBSD, v4.33 at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from [172.16.138.125] (account sudakovva@sibptus.tomsk.ru HELO admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.8) with ESMTPSA id 8364628 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 14:18:58 +0700 Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l767IwV7023848 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 14:18:58 +0700 (OMSST) (envelope-from sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru using -f Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 14:18:57 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070806071857.GA23813@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20070724115401.GA1355@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20070806025614.GA21368@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://vas.tomsk.ru/vas.asc Subject: Re: dump -L X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 07:19:01 -0000 illoai@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > I always use "dump -L" to dump a live filesystem. > > > However, when I restore the dump, I sometimes get messages like > > > "foo.txt (inode 12345) not found on tape" or > > > "expected next file 12345, got 23456" > > > > > > I thought this should _never_ happen when dumping a snapshot. > > > > > > What is it? > > > > Does nobody know the answer, or am I the only one experiencing the > > problem? > > I don't know the answer, but I get essentially the > same behaviour. I have never seen any data loss, I gave an example below. The file "wins.dat" was not dumped. It is indeed missing from the tape. If this is not a data loss, what is it then? [root@big ~] restore -b64 -rN ./spool/samba.lock/wins.dat: (inode 2829098) not found on tape expected next file 267, got 4 expected next file 2828988, got 2828987 -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 09:25:14 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE88316A418 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 09:25:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wilkinsa@obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au) Received: from digger1.defence.gov.au (digger1.defence.gov.au [203.5.217.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C2813C47E for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 09:25:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wilkinsa@obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au) Received: from ednmsw510.dsto.defence.gov.au (ednmsw510.dsto.defence.gov.au [131.185.68.11]) by digger1.defence.gov.au (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l7690RAV021428 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 18:30:27 +0930 (CST) Received: from ednex510.dsto.defence.gov.au (ednex510.dsto.defence.gov.au) by ednmsw510.dsto.defence.gov.au (Clearswift SMTPRS 5.2.9) with ESMTP id for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 18:41:10 +0930 Received: from obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au ([203.6.60.208]) by ednex510.dsto.defence.gov.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 6 Aug 2007 18:41:10 +0930 Received: from obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l769AYlF063075 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 17:10:34 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from wilkinsa@obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au) Received: (from wilkinsa@localhost) by obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l769AYWO063074 for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 17:10:34 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from wilkinsa) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 17:10:34 +0800 From: "Wilkinson, Alex" To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070806091033.GA57676@obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline Organisation: Defence Science Technology Organisation User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Aug 2007 09:11:10.0347 (UTC) FILETIME=[BACA3DB0:01C7D809] X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-7.0.0.1526-5.0.1021-15340.001 X-TM-AS-Result: No-1.061900-0.000000-31 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: setfacl(1) - Can FreeBSD's ACLs contain groups from NT/AD domains ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 09:25:14 -0000 Hi all, I have "FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #1: Wed Jul 25" authenticating successfully against active directory via samba's winbindd(8). I need to manage samba shares via FreeBSD ACLs and CIFS ACLs. From my reading of setfacl(1) I should be able to set group permissions using the syntax of DOMAIN\group-name. For example: #setfacl -d -m g:"MYDOMAIN\mygroupname":rwx test However, when I do this on FreeBSD -CURRENT I get the following error: #setfacl -d -m g:"MYDOMAIN\mygroupname":rwx test setfacl: g:MYDOMAIN\mygroupname: Invalid argument >From a quick Google it looks like Linux ACLs can do the aforementioned [http://www.techtutorials.net/blogs/index.php?mode=viewuser&user_id=7]. Does anyone know ? -aW IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence Organisation and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the CRIMES ACT 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 10:06:55 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B14A116A417 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 10:06:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Johan@double-l.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D31813C4B6 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 10:06:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Johan@double-l.nl) Received: from w2003s01.double-l.local (dpm.xs4all.nl [213.84.11.61]) by smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l76A6mFG070342; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:06:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Johan@double-l.nl) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:06:46 +0200 Message-ID: <57200BF94E69E54880C9BB1AF714BBCB19BC14@w2003s01.double-l.local> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: setfacl(1) - Can FreeBSD's ACLs contain groups from NT/AD domains ? Thread-Index: AcfYDAif0/2UTcepTVGnwrCEEalcpgABTRcw References: <20070806091033.GA57676@obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au> From: "Johan Hendriks" To: "Wilkinson, Alex" X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: setfacl(1) - Can FreeBSD's ACLs contain groups from NT/AD domains ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 10:06:55 -0000 >Hi all, >I have "FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #1: Wed Jul 25" authenticating successfully = against >active directory via samba's winbindd(8). I need to manage samba shares = via >FreeBSD ACLs and CIFS ACLs. From my reading of setfacl(1) I should be = able to >set group permissions using the syntax of DOMAIN\group-name. For = example: > #setfacl -d -m g:"MYDOMAIN\mygroupname":rwx test >However, when I do this on FreeBSD -CURRENT I get the following error: > #setfacl -d -m g:"MYDOMAIN\mygroupname":rwx test > setfacl: g:MYDOMAIN\mygroupname: Invalid argument >From a quick Google it looks like Linux ACLs can do the aforementioned >[http://www.techtutorials.net/blogs/index.php?mode=3Dviewuser&user_id=3D= 7]. >Does anyone know ? As far as i know and the way i do it is leaving the Domain part out just = the group name. Wbinfo -g shows the groups if all is ok. Regards, Johan No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition.=20 Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.6/938 - Release Date: 5-8-2007 = 16:16 =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 10:08:50 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFCA116A417 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 10:08:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@cpcnw.co.uk) Received: from 3bsd.cpcnw.co.uk (custompc.plus.com [81.174.174.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B2FB13C45E for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 10:08:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@cpcnw.co.uk) Received: from 3bsd.cpcnw.co.uk (localhost.cpcnw.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) by 3bsd.cpcnw.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l76A8P7s001376 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:08:25 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from admin@cpcnw.co.uk) Received: (from admin@localhost) by 3bsd.cpcnw.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l76A8PNc001375 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:08:25 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from admin@cpcnw.co.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: 3bsd.cpcnw.co.uk: admin set sender to admin@cpcnw.co.uk using -f Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:08:25 +0100 From: Graham Bentley To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070806100825.GB893@cpcnw.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: USB Phone Charging X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 10:08:50 -0000 Hi All, Still not got to the bottom of this one ; My Blackberry mobile phone refuses to charge from USB when logged into FreeBSD. dmesg -a shows; ugen1: Research In Motion Blackberry Device etc usbdevs -v shows ; Controller /dev/usb1: addr 1: full speed, self powered, config 1, UHCI root hub(0x0000), VIA(0x0000) rev 1.00 port1 powered port2 addr 2: full speed, power 100ma, config 1, blackberry Device(0x0000) Research In Motion(0x0fca), rev 1.04 Perhaps 100ma isnt enough for charging ? Any ideas ? Thanks ! -- admin@cpcnw.co.uk www.cpcnw.co.uk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 10:43:45 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DFCD16A417 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 10:43:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from karol.kwiat@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A8C13C428 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 10:43:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from karol.kwiat@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w9so1495034mue for ; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 03:43:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type; b=t2/v0mgkNVqPJXRtrHOkDamVFFtnPm78KbjNOMaoS3qgMJV5FydDeYtLFM2hZAx2c4D9zc3V42u3F+IN8/xEE27VvSlPbgpl0IFLvgdG0c9eGUj7YWOB+Ggepef1oGBhst/vl/qPNQ9qaltN16RzMhOV10n4jDmznvwpJRiBobc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type; b=JJ4sYXs3X4gHQHWJPKgGeLD5gesm4LDuLDO1j7dEyyY+w6dsaDjdejvjZ4CZMWP7zxH5+1RNXRcDsJx+YegmuQq4+NuRvyY8fs4pVXZpSDpCE4W5bR0id4lcPJ9BIwdd4bNr6C/aAh/p3RMeSsqKHWLpS+jE27gICjJ8737BTnY= Received: by 10.86.4.2 with SMTP id 2mr4278104fgd.1186397023335; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 03:43:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from persephone.orchid.homeunix.org ( [84.10.173.180]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm12353494fkr.2007.08.06.03.43.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 06 Aug 2007 03:43:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46B6FB45.5010608@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 12:43:17 +0200 From: Karol Kwiatkowski User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070803) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" References: <200708060655.l766tYah055101@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> In-Reply-To: <200708060655.l766tYah055101@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 OpenPGP: id=06E09309; url=http://www.orchid.homeunix.org/carlos/gpg/0x06E09309.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF37229BCE225BE82C9D4E0AC" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: portupgrade modifys EVERY +CONTENTS now? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: karol.kwiat@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 10:43:45 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF37229BCE225BE82C9D4E0AC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > Ok. But I part of my question to people , and reason for posting it > here, is the old "Is anyone else seeing this". When/if you use portupgr= ade, does > it do the same for you? Or is it just something that I happened some ho= w to inherit > on atleast 2 of my machines? 2 machines (7.0-CURRENT and 6.2-RELEASE, i386), same behaviour: $ cd /var/db/pkg $ ls -l */\+CONTENTS | wc -l 556 $ ls -lt */\+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 15736 Aug 6 10:38 mplayer-0.99.10_13/+CONTEN= TS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 571 Aug 6 10:38 xf86dgaproto-2.0.2/+CONTEN= TS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 544 Aug 6 10:38 xf86driproto-2.0.3/+CONTEN= TS [...] -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1232 Aug 6 10:37 adns-1.4/+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 61306 Aug 6 10:37 apache+mod_ssl-1.3.37+2.8.= 28/+CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1154 Aug 6 10:37 apg-2.3.0b_1/+CONTENTS $ pkg_info -Ix portupgrade portupgrade-2.3.1,2 FreeBSD ports/packages administration and management = tool s $ portupgrade portupgrade 2.3.0 (2007/07/03) HTH, Karol --=20 Karol Kwiatkowski OpenPGP 0x06E09309 --------------enigF37229BCE225BE82C9D4E0AC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQEVAwUBRrb7TAhgT0HIecD5AQi7wwgAgeCLG9c0tTUNvZ028vMxF8ebvl/f5IfK F1ghvR8J5Rv5XZPh1yBti9vFw12Lw5a6c7Wl+j7R230Czx3IGji+uIL00htQWyAQ uvwcZSqx7XjpWqfSFIYrgagpRmCfOSN+VRCxK0UZOBofwTbOkPx1yMQGB9li08f/ JrwS6q1+0So5N5qrz6sy4p/UlBBl/sw7DjOnuCm0A00+PdAhg3WwwBhz5x2DAgCN b1LJeZSTkIIFj8hFuf7Y5MkB6unSmLQGHrEUBwmzW88qfTmoGEld/30bIFlQHf3B eQ2tWhoE+bFGnziRF+l3+LGSph8pSJwc/rgVLCI5WerfYyNBuWVrLA== =W+VQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF37229BCE225BE82C9D4E0AC-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 11:02:38 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4BB216A419 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:02:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA3213C478 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:02:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from epia-2.farid-hajji.net (epia-2 [192.168.254.11]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB281DF2E0; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 13:01:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 13:05:18 +0200 From: cpghost To: Victor Sudakov Message-ID: <20070806110518.GA8074@epia-2.farid-hajji.net> References: <20070724115401.GA1355@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20070806025614.GA21368@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20070806071857.GA23813@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070806071857.GA23813@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dump -L X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 11:02:38 -0000 On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 02:18:57PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: > > > > I always use "dump -L" to dump a live filesystem. > > > > However, when I restore the dump, I sometimes get messages like > > > > "foo.txt (inode 12345) not found on tape" or > > > > "expected next file 12345, got 23456" > > > > > > > > I thought this should _never_ happen when dumping a snapshot. > > > > > > > > What is it? > > > > > > Does nobody know the answer, or am I the only one experiencing the > > > problem? > > > > I don't know the answer, but I get essentially the > > same behaviour. I have never seen any data loss, > > I gave an example below. The file "wins.dat" was not dumped. It is > indeed missing from the tape. > > If this is not a data loss, what is it then? > > [root@big ~] restore -b64 -rN > ./spool/samba.lock/wins.dat: (inode 2829098) not found on tape > expected next file 267, got 4 > expected next file 2828988, got 2828987 Uh-oh :-(. I have no idea how the code works, but just a wild guess: what happens when a file is being created and a snapshot taken at the same time? Isn't there a tiny window between inode creation and directory update? Or is file creation an atomic operation w.r.t. snapshots and dump? > Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN > sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru Regards, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 11:08:26 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE8B16A468 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:08:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D62613C4A6 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:08:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so1093076wxd for ; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 04:08:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.71.9 with SMTP id t9mr9684702wxa.1186398504500; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 04:08:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.101? ( [67.189.230.73]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i11sm5700082wxd.2007.08.06.04.08.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 06 Aug 2007 04:08:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 07:08:39 -0400 To: User Questions Organization: Seibercom.net In-Reply-To: <200708060655.l766tYah055101@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> References: <20070806064220.GA31573@rot26.obsecurity.org> <200708060655.l766tYah055101@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20070806070640.7F02.GERARD-SEIBERT@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.31 [en] From: Gerard Subject: Re[2]: portupgrade modifys EVERY +CONTENTS now? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: User Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 11:08:26 -0000 On August 06, 2007 at 02:55AM Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: [snip} > Ok. But I part of my question to people , and reason for posting it > here, is the old "Is anyone else seeing this". When/if you use portupgrade, does > it do the same for you? Or is it just something that I happened some how to inherit > on atleast 2 of my machines? I have noticed the same behavior. I have some 815 ports installed; however, I had not noticed any significant deterioration in performance. -- Gerard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 11:39:44 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7BA016A418 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:39:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from apvanderveen@att.net) Received: from mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.117]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D0713C461 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:39:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from apvanderveen@att.net) Received: from t60.mydomain.home (cpe-72-231-141-22.nycap.res.rr.com[72.231.141.22]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc13) with ESMTP id <20070806113943113008v647e>; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:39:44 +0000 Message-ID: <46B70876.9040809@att.net> Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 07:39:34 -0400 From: "Arend P. van der Veen" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070803) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <46B5E0F8.7050405@att.net> <20070806083111.F74284@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> In-Reply-To: <20070806083111.F74284@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: portsdb and cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 11:39:44 -0000 Thanks for your story. The only reason we used -U was that we were not sure what they meant got special macros. The man page for portsdb status that you only use -U if you have special macros in /etc/make.conf. All we have in there is version information so I think that does not apply to use. Thanks again, Arend Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote: > > On Sun, 5 Aug 2007, Arend P. van der Veen wrote: > >> The approach that I had been using was: >> >> /usr/local/bin/cvsup -L 0 /usr/sup/supfile >> /usr/local/sbin/portsdb -Uu >> >> This had worked great until the emacs22 update. Now portsdb crashes >> due to the emacs entry in /etc/make.conf. However, I see very little >> chatter on the lists about this. I have started to wonder if the bulk >> of the community may be updating their ports differently. Upon some >> limited research I found that I could use: >> >> /usr/local/bin/cvsup -L 0 /usr/sup/supfile >> /usr/local/sbin/portsdb -Fu >> >> This work fine for me. I can then use tools such as pkg_version, >> pkg_delete, portinstall and portupgrade without any problems. >> >> My open ended question is what does the rest of the community do to >> update their ports collection? >> > > I don't run portsdb at all. :) > > What I figured from the portsdb manpages is that if you don't run it > manually then it gets run upon using one of the portupgrade tools. I > don't mind the 30s or so delay that causes and so I don't run portsdb > manually. > > During my first few days with FreeBSD, however, I used to run ''portsdb > -Fu''. My understanding is that that would fetch the INDEX-6 and update > INDEX-6.db (since I am on FreeBSD 6.x) but I don't see why I should do > this coz the INDEX files are updated when I update the ports tree > anyways! (If I have understood this incorrectly, someone please correct > me). > > I tried ''portsdb -Uu'' just once. To see what it does. Took a long time > and so I never tried it again. From the manpage I understand that it > creates/ updates the INDEX files by running the ''make index'' command, > but the reasoning behind that didn't make sense to me ... > > So that's my story. > > Regards, > Rakhesh > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 12:35:39 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6772616A418 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:35:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakheshster@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2554F13C465 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:35:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakheshster@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so1108366wxd for ; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 05:35:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:x-x-sender:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:from:sender; b=uGbWUL52RKorpobMxVTLGbrNKB/tVm3Y7IxNBrsN7OiDB4Y4xDBBtu85eC0E6/jM1iCM0Kv0wRZose/LASPL5fy2UyobVf8EnqAZhS78AHCmD3RoViY3Wym/GH7pRRZdWy9goYui7Okn/XHOinydzdm/6XRukaQ1AItYg6RD6bo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:date:x-x-sender:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:from:sender; b=HUmmKwM4LyH5q/LA8kaHj3f5RqKatCF8a5AULXB3dIESFn2TkUmGYrEf7XChs7aURRqUJmgCVWTffGyNU0DlkH0qcMB+vY0DgEuSjyFN/cU603UlVqy7finOKIIPGz1BvNZgVv0ti78qHAEBU13dRbLONqjLdGY0z4nrLS0VnXg= Received: by 10.90.93.6 with SMTP id q6mr4481316agb.1186403738119; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 05:35:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.home.rakhesh.com ( [82.178.137.21]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v26sm7060141ele.2007.08.06.05.35.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 06 Aug 2007 05:35:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obelix.home.rakhesh.com (obelix.home.rakhesh.com [192.168.17.13]) by smtp.home.rakhesh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 747B811420; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 16:35:12 +0400 (GST) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 16:34:51 +0400 (GST) X-X-Sender: rakhesh@obelix.home.rakhesh.com To: Josh Carroll In-Reply-To: <8cb6106e0708011457q4b468723x7ecee0bf70c52809@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20070806162354.N11304@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> References: <499c70c0707260136hea82f27s87dfa53432d0e409@mail.gmail.com> <94c6ae7ae570814564d364bfe9aad8ea@szalbot.homedns.org> <20070801030504.GA3773@bifrost.agrussell.com> <8cb6106e0708011457q4b468723x7ecee0bf70c52809@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Rakhesh Sasidharan Sender: Rakhesh Sasidharan Cc: Zbigniew Szalbot , "A.G. Russell IV" , Freebsd questions Subject: Re: Waiting for BIND security announcement X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 12:35:39 -0000 On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Josh Carroll wrote: > You need wait no longer...the security advisory just went out with a patch: > > http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-07:07.bind.asc I'm on FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p4. If I do a freebsd-update shouldn't I get this? Or will there be a delay coz binary patches have to be prepared for freebsd-update? # freebsd-update fetch Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 1 mirrors found. Fetching metadata signature from update1.FreeBSD.org... done. Fetching metadata index... done. Inspecting system... done. Preparing to download files... done. No updates needed to update system to 6.2-RELEASE-p7. Regards, Rakhesh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 12:42:05 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E693A16A41A for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:42:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from M.Apitz@oclcpica.org) Received: from mail.pica.nl (mail.pica.nl [192.87.44.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E9713C461 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:42:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from M.Apitz@oclcpica.org) Received: from rebelion.Sisis.de ([193.31.10.34]) by mail.pica.nl with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 6 Aug 2007 14:42:28 +0200 Received: (from guru@localhost) by rebelion.Sisis.de (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l76Cg1lN007998 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 14:42:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from m.apitz@oclcpica.org) X-Authentication-Warning: rebelion.Sisis.de: guru set sender to m.apitz@oclcpica.org using -f Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 14:42:01 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070806124201.GA7838@rebelion.Sisis.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE (i386) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Aug 2007 12:42:28.0815 (UTC) FILETIME=[3FBEEDF0:01C7D827] Subject: FreeBSD Qemu host with 5-8 virtual machines for Linux X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 12:42:06 -0000 Hello, I'm using Qemu (0.8.2) and kqemu (1.3.0.p11) in my FreeBSD 6.2-REL laptop, but only from time to time, mostly to edit some Winword docs when the addressed people don't like OpenOffice stuff. We are a software company and need to test our applications in Linux environment. Actually this is done on some Linux host with 6 GByte RAM and VMWare Workstation 4.5.2. It seems that there is some limitation not allowing more RAM for the guest systems as real RAM in the host, i.e. 6 GByte as max. I'm thinking in reinstalling this server with FreeBSD and using Qemu for the VM's. The idea is to have at least 5-8 VM's running at the same time, each with 1-2 GByte (virt.) RAM. Any comments on this? Thx Matthias -- Matthias Apitz Manager Technical Support - OCLC PICA GmbH Gruenwalder Weg 28g - 82041 Oberhaching - Germany t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.oclcpica.org/ http://www.UnixArea.de/ b http://gurucubano.blogspot.com/ OCLC PICA GmbH, Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christine Magin-Weeger, Norbert Weinberger Sitz der Gesellschaft: Oberhaching, HRB Muenchen: 113261 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 12:46:05 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1907016A419 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:46:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cjk32@cam.ac.uk) Received: from ppsw-9.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-9.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.139]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF29713C46C for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:46:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cjk32@cam.ac.uk) X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from gw.cjkey.org.uk ([88.97.163.222]:1636 helo=[192.168.2.186]) by ppsw-9.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.159]:465) with esmtpsa (PLAIN:cjk32) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1II1yD-000113-V8 (Exim 4.63) for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org (return-path ); Mon, 06 Aug 2007 13:46:01 +0100 Message-ID: <46B71809.4040704@cam.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 13:46:01 +0100 From: Christopher Key User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: FreeBSD Installation Suggestion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 12:46:05 -0000 Hello, I'm about to install FreeBSD for the first time on a new machine and have a few questions: 1) The motherboard is an Intel DQ964GF, which uses the ICH8 chipset. Is it better to use this in IDE or AHCI mode? (The system will be booting from a S-ATA disk) 2) Are there any good documents discussing the relative merits of using i386 / amd64? 3) Does anyone have any good suggestions on how to perform the installation. The machine has no floppy or CD-ROM drive, and it's not really convenient to temporarily add them as I may well end up going through the install procedure several times. The options seem to be either a USB flash drive (any thoughts on how to get a UFS file system and FreeBSD MBR on there using only WinXP), or via the network. Any advice much appreciated, Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 12:54:14 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4097E16A417 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:54:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lreid@cs.okstate.edu) Received: from a.cs.okstate.edu (a.cs.okstate.edu [139.78.113.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2855C13C46A for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:54:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lreid@cs.okstate.edu) Received: from [172.18.0.137] (sky_cpfw-1.tulsatech.org [70.168.226.130]) by a.cs.okstate.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3791A0641; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 07:54:12 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <46B719F0.2000803@cs.okstate.edu> Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 07:54:08 -0500 From: Reid Linnemann User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070615) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: fbsd2@a1poweruser.com References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ross Penner , User questions Subject: Re: Installing from USB Flash Drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 12:54:14 -0000 Written by fbsd2 on 08/04/07 07:42>> > I was really taken with the idea for using a USB flash stick disk drive to install FreeBSD from. I used the script from the mentioned URL below as the starting point. After some changes to the script I got it to work. I was able to boot off the USB flash stick disk drive, But then was faced with a show stopper. During the sysinstall process after it asks for hard drive fdisk and bsdlable info it asks you for where to get the install files from (IE: cdrom, remote ftp, floppy, dos partition, ECT) there is no option to tell the sysinstall program to use USB-dd as source location. > > So in summary, this idea is un-usable until the sysinstall program gets updated to include an option to use USB-dd as an install source. This brings to light another problem. That is using floppies to install FreeBSD from. PC manufactures are no longer building systems with floppies drives included. Combining the FreeBSD floppy images to a single USB-dd image would be away to continue to offer this method of installing FreeBSD. > > Included below is my working script to populate a 1GB USB flash stick disk with the FreeBSD cd1 iso file. > > > #!/bin/sh > #Purpose = Use to transfer the FreeBSD install cd1 to > # a bootable 1GB USB flash drive so it can be used to install from. > # First fetch the FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso to your > # hard drive /usr. Then execute this script from the command line > # fbsd2usb /usr/6.2-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso /usr/6.2-RELEASE-i386-disc1.img > # Change system bios to boot from USB-dd and away you go. > > # NOTE: This script has to be run from root and your 1GB USB flash drive > # has to be plugged in before running this script. > > # On the command line enter fbsd2usb iso-path img-path > > # You can set some variables here. Edit them to fit your needs. > > # Set serial variable to 0 if you don't want serial console at all, > # 1 if you want comconsole and 2 if you want comconsole and vidconsole > serial=0 > > set -u > > if [ $# -lt 2 ]; then > echo "Usage: $0 source-iso-path output-img-path" > exit 1 > fi > > isoimage=$1; shift > imgoutfile=$1; shift > > # Temp directory to be used later > #export tmpdir=$(mktemp -d -t fbsdmount) > export tmpdir=$(mktemp -d /usr/fbsdmount) > > export isodev=$(mdconfig -a -t vnode -f ${isoimage}) > > ISOSIZE=$(du -k ${isoimage} | awk '{print $1}') > SECTS=$((($ISOSIZE + ($ISOSIZE/5))*4)) > #SECTS=$((($ISOSIZE + ($ISOSIZE/5))*2)) > > > echo " " > echo "### Initializing image File started ###" > echo "### This will take about 4 minutes ###" > date > dd if=/dev/zero of=${imgoutfile} count=${SECTS} > echo "### Initializing image File completed ###" > date > > echo " " > ls -l ${imgoutfile} > export imgdev=$(mdconfig -a -t vnode -f ${imgoutfile}) > > bsdlabel -w -B ${imgdev} > newfs -O1 /dev/${imgdev}a > > mkdir -p ${tmpdir}/iso ${tmpdir}/img > > mount -t cd9660 /dev/${isodev} ${tmpdir}/iso > mount /dev/${imgdev}a ${tmpdir}/img > > echo " " > echo "### Started Copying files to the image now ###" > echo "### This will take about 15 minutes ###" > date > > ( cd ${tmpdir}/iso && find . -print -depth | cpio -dump ${tmpdir}/img ) > > echo "### Completed Copying files to the image ###" > date > > > if [ ${serial} -eq 2 ]; then > echo "-D" > ${tmpdir}/img/boot.config > echo 'console="comconsole, vidconsole"' >> ${tmpdir}/img/boot/loader.conf > elif [ ${serial} -eq 1 ]; then > echo "-h" > ${tmpdir}/img/boot.config > echo 'console="comconsole"' >> ${tmpdir}/img/boot/loader.conf > fi > > echo " " > echo "### Started writing image to flash drive now ###" > echo "### This will take about 30 minutes ###" > date > dd if=${imgoutfile} of=/dev/da0 bs=1m > echo "### Completed writing image to flash drive at ###" > date > > cleanup() { > umount ${tmpdir}/iso > mdconfig -d -u ${isodev} > umount ${tmpdir}/img > mdconfig -d -u ${imgdev} > rm -rf ${tmpdir} > } > > cleanup > > ls -lh ${imgoutfile} > > echo "### Script finished ###" > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Ross Penner > Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 2:34 PM > To: User questions > Subject: Installing from USB Flash Drive > > Hi everybody, > > I'm trying to install a system on a machine that doesn't have an optical > drive. I plan on using a USB flash drive to do the job and found a > messages from hackers@freebsd.org > (http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org/msg55434.html) > about just such a thing. The script provided converts the CD image into > one suitable for a flashmemory stick. I used and coverted it without > issue. The instructions say to use dd to prepare the flash drive so > executed > #dd if=flashbsd.iso of=/dev/da0 > I'm not entirely confident that that was the correct procedure, as I'm > quite unfamilar with dd. Unfortunetly, I can't seem to get the drive to > boot. I can mount the filesystem so it seems that prepareing the drive was > succesful. I'm using a via chipset and yes, the bios is set to boot from > USB-FDD. I used the 6.2 boot only image. >