From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 12 03:39:33 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E02237B401 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 03:39:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.hotbox.ru (smtp.hotbox.ru [80.68.244.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF36643F75 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 03:39:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from denb@front.ru) Received: from ws-2.dep624 ([212.1.235.150]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.hotbox.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7CAQYCe083145 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 14:26:35 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from denb@front.ru) From: Denis Borisov To: ipfw@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 14:26:11 +0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200308121426.11858.denb@front.ru> Subject: When will implemented in-kernel NAT? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 10:39:33 -0000 In comments in file ip_fw2.c i read: * Dynamic rules can be used for different purposes: * + stateful rules; * + enforcing limits on the number of sessions; * + in-kernel NAT (not implemented yet) When will implemented in-kernel NAT? Regards, Denis