Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 7 May 2007 16:05:31 -0600
From:      "Kirk Davis" <Kirk.Davis@epsb.ca>
To:        "Julian Elischer" <julian@elischer.org>
Cc:        Freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject:   RE: Policy Routing natd+ipfw
Message-ID:  <DB9A31C316524A4A83E54A2C0D20655702216E5A@Exchange24.EDU.epsb.ca>
In-Reply-To: <463E377E.2000300@elischer.org>
References:  <33910a2c0705041812s2aaf0b62t785e16abc0decee6@mail.gmail.com> <463E377E.2000300@elischer.org>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
=20
Julian Elischer wrote:
>=20
> in -current you can implement a routing table via FWD and tables.
> in  6.x you need to specify the next hop. and an more explicit rule.

   Is there any information floating around on how to do this in current
using the FWD rules and tables? Any pointer on where to look.

   Right now I am using fwd rules on our BGP router (Quagga & FreeBSD
6.2) to force one of our subnets out a particular interface and avoid
the routing table but I would prefer to do it more like a dual routing
table where I can make more routing decisions than just forcing all
packets from that subnet out the interface.  I could test it on one of
our current boxes.

>=20
> julian

---- Kirk



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DB9A31C316524A4A83E54A2C0D20655702216E5A>