From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 05:02:51 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 360121AC; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 05:02:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x234.google.com (mail-la0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 896EC1798; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 05:02:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id ty20so4589055lab.11 for ; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 22:02:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=WzsLZOYCFHgDgO5quxDfR61skKEIl/TaBEgPQ5Lx5Rc=; b=vfgVvzZcsQhYnKtSvr5wp7+HCjOUZl3LlDuay9ZlWulyFtvlAiWPYKBHM6VUGXHyv9 Guo+cHrzprWPHJrbwOuXUf7WdAn7D5XuosXZ07SLTvJ64rilsuFHp1zzMXQhqbJDuGwg TBRWaoYogH4t6hqgchtpCBUZENaWkesJRbJTZylxVSw9CWYlSIiH0XyIWFaYloA72XFc 9/eNB3wjxtdV0sSmxSu0xj07hj/mV+MH8ecM/1xxHiCHLw3F9vD/+LJiK6I5BF7QusmH n7O7/3b7rRISQDN7/6mlZEb/KZ9T5XnaypcxSR0bzq0aWX13953rIzl6RoXC9UX0+hdW OngQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.173.136 with SMTP id bk8mr179934lbc.88.1409461368296; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 22:02:48 -0700 (PDT) Sender: crodr001@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.197.107 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 22:02:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 22:02:48 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: fWQQ6YUeAgLsrJGjzu1finOPqxQ Message-ID: Subject: pkg-static: pkg-1.4.0.p.a11 conflicts with pkg-1.3.7 (installs files into the same place). From: Craig Rodrigues To: ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 05:02:51 -0000 Hi, I did a fresh install of 10-STABLE on a new system. I set up the new xorg repository as outlined here: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-announce/2014-July/001570.html When I tried to install a bunch of packages, I got this conflict: pkg-static: pkg-1.4.0.p.a11 conflicts with pkg-1.3.7 (installs files into the same place). Problematic file: /usr/local/etc/bash_completion.d/_pkg.bash The full log of what I typed is here: https://people.freebsd.org/~rodrigc/pkg-1.3.7-pkg-1.40.conflict.txt What is the best way to solve this? In future, how do we deal with the case where someone sets up multiple package repositories, but one repo has a dependency on a different version of pkg? -- Craig From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 07:00:57 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3766D4B9; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 07:00:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout09.t-online.de (mailout09.t-online.de [194.25.134.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailout00.t-online.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D89F81075; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 07:00:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fwd01.aul.t-online.de (fwd01.aul.t-online.de [172.20.27.147]) by mailout09.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 043CD628F85; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 08:54:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.119.33] (EkzFaEZHYhsxiLhBL8+PrfwZEhUkU3iRSA0Z4q0Cdmhw0AYCLSTjWRylnCVBJGOQ9d@[84.154.101.219]) by fwd01.t-online.de with (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) esmtp id 1XNz1S-0ROq9I0; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 08:53:58 +0200 Message-ID: <5402C685.1030507@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 08:53:57 +0200 From: Stefan Esser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Filippo Moretti , x11@freebsd.org Subject: [Analyzed] Re: Problem with xorg References: <1409238190.56909.YahooMailNeo@web140904.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <53FF6A32.6020509@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <53FF6A32.6020509@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ID: EkzFaEZHYhsxiLhBL8+PrfwZEhUkU3iRSA0Z4q0Cdmhw0AYCLSTjWRylnCVBJGOQ9d X-TOI-MSGID: 76a9b127-6fc2-4e6c-97b1-bbf063109170 Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" , Ports FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 07:00:57 -0000 The problem is caused by Unicode code points in keymap files, which were made possible (and have to be used) for many locales after the introduction of Unicode support with vt(4). Am 28.08.2014 um 19:43 schrieb Stefan Esser: > Am 28.08.2014 um 17:03 schrieb Filippo Moretti via freebsd-stable: >> I have problem with xorg with my custom kernel both with and without VT supports. >> I can still reboot with generic and have xorg work.My system:FreeBSD sting 10.0-STABLE FreeBSD 10.0-STABLE #0 r269789: Mon Aug 11 02:47:02 UTC 2014 root@grind.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 >> With my kernel-vt I get a sementation fault,while with SC I got a complete crash > [...] >> [ 3434.354] (**) Option "Protocol" "standard" >> [ 3434.354] (WW) Option "Device" requires an string value >> [ 3434.354] (**) Option "XkbRules" "base" >> [ 3434.354] (**) Option "XkbModel" "pc105" >> [ 3434.354] (**) Option "XkbLayout" "us" >> [ 3434.354] (**) Option "config_info" "hal:/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/usb_device_46d_c517_noserial_if0" >> [ 3434.354] (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "USB Receiver" (type: KEYBOARD, id 7) >> [ 3434.354] Segmentation fault at address 0x2a3da760 >> [ 3434.354] >> Fatal server error: >> [ 3434.354] Caught signal 11 (Segmentation fault). Server aborting >> [ 3434.354] >> [ 3434.355] >> Please consult the The X.Org Foundation support >> at http://wiki.x.org >> for help. >> [ 3434.355] Please also check the log file at "/var/log/Xorg.0.log" for additional information. > > Just a me-to, but on -CURRENT: > > [ 357.752] (**) Keyboard0: always reports core events > [ 357.752] (**) Option "Protocol" "standard" > [ 357.752] (**) Option "XkbRules" "xorg" > [ 357.752] (**) Option "XkbModel" "pc105" > [ 357.752] (**) Option "XkbLayout" "de" > [ 357.752] (**) Option "XkbVariant" "nodeadkeys" > [ 357.752] (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "Keyboard0" > (type: KEYBOARD, id 7) > [ 357.752] Segmentation fault at address 0x80500ae80 > [ 357.752] > Fatal server error: > [ 357.752] Caught signal 11 (Segmentation fault). Server aborting Further information: I used ktrace to identify the failing operation. It is in x11-drivers/xf86-input-keyboard line 1265 of bsd_KeyMap.c: #define KD_GET_ENTRY(i,n) \ eascii_to_x[((keymap.key[i].spcl << (n+1)) & 0x100) + keymap.key[i].map[n]] [...] void KbdGetMapping (InputInfoPtr pInfo, KeySymsPtr pKeySyms, CARD8 *pModMap) { KbdDevPtr pKbd = (KbdDevPtr) pInfo->private; KeySym *k; int i; #ifndef __bsdi__ switch (pKbd->consType) { /* * XXX wscons has no GIO_KEYMAP */ #if (defined (SYSCONS_SUPPORT) || defined (PCVT_SUPPORT)) && defined(GIO_KEYMAP) case SYSCONS: case PCVT: { keymap_t keymap; if (ioctl(pInfo->fd, GIO_KEYMAP, &keymap) != -1) { for (i = 0; i < keymap.n_keys && i < NUM_KEYCODES; i++) if (remap[i]) { k = map + (remap[i] << 2); k[0] = KD_GET_ENTRY(i,0); /* non-shifed */ k[1] = KD_GET_ENTRY(i,1); /* shifted */ k[2] = KD_GET_ENTRY(i,4); /* alt */ k[3] = KD_GET_ENTRY(i,5); /* alt - shifted */ if (k[3] == k[2]) k[3] = NoSymbol; if (k[2] == k[1]) k[2] = NoSymbol; if (k[1] == k[0]) k[1] = NoSymbol; if (k[0] == k[2] && k[1] == k[3]) k[2] = k[3] = NoSymbol; } } } break; #endif /* SYSCONS || PCVT */ The keymap returned by ioctl(GIO_KEYMAP) used to contain characters in the selected locale, which meant it was limited to 8 bit values, effectively. Now with Unicode support, larger values (>=0x100) can be found in keymap files. In my case, the Euro symbol (0x20ac) was the cause of an out-of-bounds access to the keymap array in line 1265 of bsd_KbdMap.c (assignment to k[2] for Alt "E"). I did not have time to investigate, how this problem can be resolved, though. But I'll create a ports PR with this information, since it must be resolved before 10.1, or users of keyboard layouts that generate characters beyond u+ff will reliably crash the X server ... Regards, STefan PS: PR ports/193192 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 07:45:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63DCFB8B; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 07:45:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-x229.google.com (mail-qg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E75181471; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 07:45:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id i50so4059323qgf.14 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 00:45:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=LJI07+S2ko/pHCHiZYgHuoR/0AeOk0krmHhYwNuepqk=; b=jQ5d5HrMryCszonTehup0mFusvc5zEWd/fZBVMOhZtiRM+jbBtMyzszKSD+xZhG+L6 5ofTFnv8nwDSoQKfWPybLSSGx1gOsXwPvWlfejBb9oT1S6JHlXqR8a51VdjRUOlPEm0P ZFMgQpEaWo5r1rJ+Xe0SbSLFodEQfAiDHq2oS+PG/WNi5CyJ1OHUQ7bXc9xBO4qlnBik psWmOIjxY3/r9O9KOR4Zfl169J1fPKLQGdjRgkANtwcGQOjA0OkfrPVjXmB+XvobTH7m +lwex/0ryJ9oKwMOnjDalf5H9hAph7W2Bq1S2kylZhHzTOQBLTsK458BlICZW23m/Ax8 BAAw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.80.167 with SMTP id c36mr31786506qgd.52.1409471100490; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 00:45:00 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.39.139 with HTTP; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 00:45:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5402C685.1030507@freebsd.org> References: <1409238190.56909.YahooMailNeo@web140904.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <53FF6A32.6020509@freebsd.org> <5402C685.1030507@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 00:45:00 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: SnEWP1SH617oa-06-hUQjSd0MFs Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Analyzed] Re: Problem with xorg From: Adrian Chadd To: Stefan Esser Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" , x11@freebsd.org, Ports FreeBSD , Filippo Moretti X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 07:45:02 -0000 Ok, so what can we do right now to not have unicode characters in say, the US keymap file? (Just a local change, not committed anywhere - I agree it needs to be fixed in the xorg code.) -a From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 07:51:04 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67C4CE1A for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 07:51:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F7B31542 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 07:51:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1XNzud-000CwT-7v; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 09:50:59 +0200 Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 09:50:59 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Ted Faber Subject: Re: How to submit a port update? Message-ID: <20140831075059.GW9400@home.opsec.eu> References: <5401F646.6030304@lunabase.org> <20140830175001.GS9400@home.opsec.eu> <54023CF9.1040002@lunabase.org> <20140830212321.GV9400@home.opsec.eu> <540250CF.5010803@lunabase.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <540250CF.5010803@lunabase.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 07:51:04 -0000 Hi! > The update is mostly some small changes to the code to eliminate clang++ > and recent g++ warnings along with Eric's typo, which has been > languishing for a while. I know it's a small thing, but seeing those > warnings when I compile the port makes me sad. Obviously you guys can > reject if you don't feel it's worth it. Well, it's always nice to check process and procedures while it's not time-critical 8-} And you are right, the porters handbook still mentions send-pr. There is one thing which is very nice to have for an incoming PR: poudriere test logs that prove that the updated port builds cleanly. If you never used poudriere, have a look at this short starter guide: https://fossil.etoilebsd.net/poudriere/doc/trunk/doc/using_testport.wiki > That changes the port diff, of course. The new one is attached, or I > can update bugzilla. Always update bugzilla (says the guy who preferres mail...) > Sorry to bug you if it's too trivial a change. No, it's fine. I guess I would only release new versions if runtime bugs or runtime functionality changes. You also updated the autotools environment, maybe that fixes other stuff as well. You re-rolled the distfile without a version change, this is not purrrfect, but well, what else is 8-) -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 6 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 08:03:30 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76D28FB9; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 08:03:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout07.t-online.de (mailout07.t-online.de [194.25.134.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailout00.t-online.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 354501761; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 08:03:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fwd01.aul.t-online.de (fwd01.aul.t-online.de [172.20.27.147]) by mailout07.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 5CD2345E341; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 09:58:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.119.33] (r1QR3vZXYhfIzedxgpBaSLj9aCeXN+9XOR1zIvNHf-kpNWN6fB044O9VUoQ7VTaZdK@[84.154.101.219]) by fwd01.t-online.de with (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) esmtp id 1XO01P-0CZqhU0; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 09:57:59 +0200 Message-ID: <5402D585.9050200@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 09:57:57 +0200 From: Stefan Esser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Chadd , Stefan Esser Subject: Re: [Analyzed] Re: Problem with xorg References: <1409238190.56909.YahooMailNeo@web140904.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <53FF6A32.6020509@freebsd.org> <5402C685.1030507@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ID: r1QR3vZXYhfIzedxgpBaSLj9aCeXN+9XOR1zIvNHf-kpNWN6fB044O9VUoQ7VTaZdK X-TOI-MSGID: 54c55cfc-9f9e-47aa-9c2d-aa64d55c7ea0 Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" , x11@freebsd.org, Filippo Moretti , Ports FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 08:03:30 -0000 Am 31.08.2014 um 09:45 schrieb Adrian Chadd: > Ok, so what can we do right now to not have unicode characters in say, > the US keymap file? The "normal" US keyboard (/usr/share/vt/keymaps/us.kbd) does not contain characters >= 0x100. There is no problem even with ISO8859-1 characters used in many European countries, since they all are in the range 0x00 to 0xff. A problem is European keyboards with teh Euro sign (0x20ac) or e.g. Cyrillic or Greek keyboards, where many characters are >= 0x100. > (Just a local change, not committed anywhere - I agree it needs to be > fixed in the xorg code.) I'm wondering whether it might make sense to have the work-around committed to the xf86-input-keyboard port. People will waste time trying to understand, why their X server stops working when they select a keyboard layout with problematic characters for use with vt. This was not possible until a few weeks ago, since there were no such keymaps committed to vt/keymaps. If you had a keymap defined in rc.conf, then the name that used to work with syscons did not work with vt, but was just ignored (and the compiled in default US keyboard layout was used). I plan to commit a change to rc.d/syscons, soon, which will allow vt to be used with syscons keymap names (which are then internally converted to vt keymap names). With that change to rc.d/syscons, people will have their localized keyboard layout under vt, but will not be able to a local X11 server, anymore ... So I'm considering to commit the work-around patch, since a single missing key (under plain X11 - e.g. KDE works with all keys) will be just a minor violation of POLA, compared to no X11 at all. Regards, STefan From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 08:35:31 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFFA16C8 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 08:35:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp07.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5115E19DE for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 08:35:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([92.162.7.60]) by mwinf5d14 with ME id lLbN1o0051HifEc03LbNZK; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 10:35:23 +0200 X-ME-Helo: localhost X-ME-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 10:35:23 +0200 X-ME-IP: 92.162.7.60 Message-ID: <5402DE49.4020900@orange.fr> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 10:35:21 +0200 From: Claude Buisson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefan Esser , Filippo Moretti , x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Analyzed] Re: Problem with xorg References: <1409238190.56909.YahooMailNeo@web140904.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <53FF6A32.6020509@freebsd.org> <5402C685.1030507@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <5402C685.1030507@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" , Ports FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 08:35:31 -0000 On 08/31/2014 08:53, Stefan Esser wrote: > The problem is caused by Unicode code points in keymap files, which were > made possible (and have to be used) for many locales after the > introduction of Unicode support with vt(4). > > Am 28.08.2014 um 19:43 schrieb Stefan Esser: >> Am 28.08.2014 um 17:03 schrieb Filippo Moretti via freebsd-stable: >>> I have problem with xorg with my custom kernel both with and without VT supports. >>> I can still reboot with generic and have xorg work.My system:FreeBSD sting 10.0-STABLE FreeBSD 10.0-STABLE #0 r269789: Mon Aug 11 02:47:02 UTC 2014 root@grind.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 >>> With my kernel-vt I get a sementation fault,while with SC I got a complete crash >> [...] >>> [ 3434.354] (**) Option "Protocol" "standard" >>> [ 3434.354] (WW) Option "Device" requires an string value >>> [ 3434.354] (**) Option "XkbRules" "base" >>> [ 3434.354] (**) Option "XkbModel" "pc105" >>> [ 3434.354] (**) Option "XkbLayout" "us" >>> [ 3434.354] (**) Option "config_info" "hal:/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/usb_device_46d_c517_noserial_if0" >>> [ 3434.354] (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "USB Receiver" (type: KEYBOARD, id 7) >>> [ 3434.354] Segmentation fault at address 0x2a3da760 >>> [ 3434.354] >>> Fatal server error: >>> [ 3434.354] Caught signal 11 (Segmentation fault). Server aborting >>> [ 3434.354] >>> [ 3434.355] >>> Please consult the The X.Org Foundation support >>> at http://wiki.x.org >>> for help. >>> [ 3434.355] Please also check the log file at "/var/log/Xorg.0.log" for additional information. >> >> Just a me-to, but on -CURRENT: >> >> [ 357.752] (**) Keyboard0: always reports core events >> [ 357.752] (**) Option "Protocol" "standard" >> [ 357.752] (**) Option "XkbRules" "xorg" >> [ 357.752] (**) Option "XkbModel" "pc105" >> [ 357.752] (**) Option "XkbLayout" "de" >> [ 357.752] (**) Option "XkbVariant" "nodeadkeys" >> [ 357.752] (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "Keyboard0" >> (type: KEYBOARD, id 7) >> [ 357.752] Segmentation fault at address 0x80500ae80 >> [ 357.752] >> Fatal server error: >> [ 357.752] Caught signal 11 (Segmentation fault). Server aborting > > Further information: I used ktrace to identify the failing operation. > It is in x11-drivers/xf86-input-keyboard line 1265 of bsd_KeyMap.c: > > #define KD_GET_ENTRY(i,n) \ > eascii_to_x[((keymap.key[i].spcl << (n+1)) & 0x100) + > keymap.key[i].map[n]] > > [...] > > void > KbdGetMapping (InputInfoPtr pInfo, KeySymsPtr pKeySyms, CARD8 *pModMap) > { > KbdDevPtr pKbd = (KbdDevPtr) pInfo->private; > KeySym *k; > int i; > > #ifndef __bsdi__ > switch (pKbd->consType) { > > /* > * XXX wscons has no GIO_KEYMAP > */ > #if (defined (SYSCONS_SUPPORT) || defined (PCVT_SUPPORT)) && > defined(GIO_KEYMAP) > case SYSCONS: > case PCVT: > { > keymap_t keymap; > > if (ioctl(pInfo->fd, GIO_KEYMAP, &keymap) != -1) { > for (i = 0; i < keymap.n_keys && i < NUM_KEYCODES; i++) > if (remap[i]) { > k = map + (remap[i] << 2); > k[0] = KD_GET_ENTRY(i,0); /* non-shifed */ > k[1] = KD_GET_ENTRY(i,1); /* shifted */ > k[2] = KD_GET_ENTRY(i,4); /* alt */ > k[3] = KD_GET_ENTRY(i,5); /* alt - shifted */ > if (k[3] == k[2]) k[3] = NoSymbol; > if (k[2] == k[1]) k[2] = NoSymbol; > if (k[1] == k[0]) k[1] = NoSymbol; > if (k[0] == k[2] && k[1] == k[3]) > k[2] = k[3] = NoSymbol; > } > } > } > break; > #endif /* SYSCONS || PCVT */ > > The keymap returned by ioctl(GIO_KEYMAP) used to contain characters > in the selected locale, which meant it was limited to 8 bit values, > effectively. > > Now with Unicode support, larger values (>=0x100) can be found in > keymap files. In my case, the Euro symbol (0x20ac) was the cause > of an out-of-bounds access to the keymap array in line 1265 of > bsd_KbdMap.c (assignment to k[2] for Alt "E"). > > I did not have time to investigate, how this problem can be > resolved, though. > > But I'll create a ports PR with this information, since it must be > resolved before 10.1, or users of keyboard layouts that generate > characters beyond u+ff will reliably crash the X server ... > > Regards, STefan > > PS: PR ports/193192 I have already done PR/191459, with a patch to be added to x11-drivers/xf86-input-keyboard (thanks Thierry Thomas to restoring it). The last contribution by ray@ is totally irrelevant - in fact the same problem appears with syscons + TEKEN_UTF8 Claude Buisson From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 09:50:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AC14BEB for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 09:50:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hapkido.dreamhost.com (hapkido.dreamhost.com [66.33.216.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A04A1FCB for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 09:50:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a6.g.dreamhost.com (homie.mail.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.208]) by hapkido.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 366FC9214D for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 02:50:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a6.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a6.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F6BD59806C for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 02:49:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=dylanleigh.net; h=date :from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to; s=dylanleigh.net; bh=hNfnSovPtfsTiTeH4ZoUGe3yOMk=; b=vU/XQ2BvqD/J0GP+okE+7ytacx3SWeyJ4tqKiQvLszPMsjld8eS5l0WHohsFp 0ywELul/cVtsPvX+1dBBnQvSQ7uqtZAInNNq3AjkA7oCRZG+tq4c/n7OPEzDHHy5 YRMP4W1AHF/hCmbyqMb6l7vtCCUuF4Xk8VMPN0nIZYAJ3s= Received: from exhan.dylanleigh.net (ppp118-209-111-31.lns20.mel4.internode.on.net [118.209.111.31]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dleigh@htns.net) by homiemail-a6.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C36459806B for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 02:49:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 19:49:30 +1000 From: Dylan Leigh To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Patch with issues for amanda-server/amanda-client Message-ID: <20140831094930.GA31615@exhan.dylanleigh.net> References: <20140831091814.A861C704071@homiemail-a5.g.dreamhost.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140831091814.A861C704071@homiemail-a5.g.dreamhost.com> X-Author-WWW: http://www.dylanleigh.net User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 09:50:12 -0000 I've filed a patch to amanda-server (and slave port amanda-client) to add staging support and set me as maintainer: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193196 This is my first staging patch; I followed all the steps in the wiki guide at https://wiki.freebsd.org/ports/StageDir but have a few unresolved issues because the way the port is built: 1) Amanda (upstream code) builds its own install-hook target which it uses to set setuid bits amongst other things, This isn't ideal and prevents packages being built as non-root. I have tried to fix this but haven't had the time yet to figure it out so I have set NEEDS_ROOT in the Makefile for now. 2) Many reported orphans were added to the plist after several iterations of the patch, and I am not sure if I have set everything correctly so that files which will only be present given certain OPTIONS are set correctly in the plist and vice versa. Some of the reported orphans seem to be false positives (see (3)) 3) The way the whole Amanda port is split into a master -server and a slave -client seems to be causing a lot of the complications In particular, the master -server port actually depends on the slave -client port being built. The -server port contains all the code for building the client including a seperate plist and a big chunk of the Makefile. It might solve some of the complication if the seperation between the two was ripped out with one port for both with a CLIENT_ONLY option (as the server requires the client files installed anyway). Please let me know if you have any advice/criticism/suggestions/hints/ opinions/there is anything missing. Thanks, Dylan -- Dylan Leigh // VU# s4081906 // www.dylanleigh.net From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 10:28:05 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2526E419 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 10:28:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 113351458 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 10:28:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s7VAS4Ch095385 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 10:28:04 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id s7VAS4JT095384; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 10:28:04 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201408311028.s7VAS4JT095384@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 10:28:04 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 10:28:05 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ lang/rakudo | 2013.10 | 2014.08 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ mail/dcc-dccd | 1.3.141 | 1.3.155 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 11:35:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 010AA58C for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 11:35:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 900501BB3 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 11:35:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.239] ([212.98.32.54]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LrvWY-1YQdeJ3ooY-013cqx for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 13:34:58 +0200 Message-ID: <540308BE.3070009@gmx.net> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 13:36:30 +0200 From: Simon Wright User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] SSP Package Repository available References: <523D79CD.2090302@FreeBSD.org> <53F4CE0E.8040106@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <53F4CE0E.8040106@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:9N60DcocqxCY6lAdIJE+u6amRd/CGqoVabc6NBGfOrZgQ0gzAj3 b7PHNY83HGBJRUJg0xP67wtojVHJem27z235VJWePx/RXXNAV1oHEI6DcjLCQBvWPJ/z5DK R4ernkdIy5g1Pg4rECD0SYdTkMw41EYxynEsn5XpBNoB92Q92cG3xv6fsDv51kYMSBSoZCb 9ntlS6P56thd+7b4GQ9MQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 11:35:07 -0000 On 20/08/2014 18:34, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10 >> i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently. >> >> Support may be added for earlier i386 releases once all ports properly >> respect LDFLAGS. >> >> To enable, just add WITH_SSP=yes to your make.conf and rebuild all ports. >> >> The default SSP_CLFAGS is -fstack-protector, but -fstack-protector-all >> may optionally be set instead. >> >> Please help test this on your system. We would like to eventually enable >> this by default, but need to identify any major ports that have run-time >> issues due to it. >> >> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffer_overflow_protection >> > > We have not had any feedback on this yet and want to get it enabled by > default for ports and packages. > > We now have a repository that you can use rather than the default to > help test. We need your help to identify any issues before switching the > default. Another data point: I've been using WITH_SSP_PORTS=yes for building from ports since late 2013. No issues noticed on 9.2 and 9.3 amd64 systems. I have also been building a selection of packages locally with poudriere using the same make.conf setting for about two months and have seen no issues there either. I have just updated my pkg configuration to use the new repository and have reinstalled all official packages. Regards, Simon Wright. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 15:34:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F788A7; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 15:34:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gilb.zs64.net (gilb.zs64.net [212.12.50.234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gilb.zs64.net", Issuer "Cryptonomicore CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C88A71392; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 15:34:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gilb.zs64.net (Postfix, from stb@lassitu.de) id BA82C132CD8; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 15:34:01 +0000 (UTC) From: Stefan Bethke Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_AC29A5E8-5C73-4F13-BD19-409D4EC3418A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Subject: lang/tlc86: missing standard modules? Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 17:32:56 +0200 Message-Id: <6FCE12CD-81A7-4D7E-AABE-882CDB9BB479@lassitu.de> To: gahr@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 15:34:11 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_AC29A5E8-5C73-4F13-BD19-409D4EC3418A Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Hey, since the update to tcl86-8.6.2, I=92m getting this error trace: can't find package msgcat 1.4 while executing "package require msgcat 1.4" ("uplevel" body line 2) invoked from within "uplevel \#0 { package require msgcat 1.4 if { $::tcl_platform(platform) eq {windows} } { if { [catch { package require registry 1.1 }] } { ..." (file "/usr/local/lib/tcl8.6/clock.tcl" line 21) invoked from within "source -encoding utf-8 [file join $TclLibDir clock.tcl]" (procedure "::tcl::clock::format" line 3) invoked from within "clock format [clock seconds] -gmt 1 -format "\"updated %Y%m%d = %H%M%S\""" (procedure "update_zone" line 27) invoked from within "update_zone $host $ip=93 As far as I can tell, msgcat should be included with Tcl. Botched = install, or is the port broken? I=92m going to try a downgrade next. Cheers, Stefan --=20 Stefan Bethke Fon +49 151 14070811 --Apple-Mail=_AC29A5E8-5C73-4F13-BD19-409D4EC3418A Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUA0AoAAoJEA/POViuFuLBIHAH/2dbI3C3y1YviY59RpHGQWuu 6+2klXPEJ/vbU5khktEdfvsddQKE+EIPfYikudi/WH5lF6sDVh4NVLvsUp2O5BDC ULUMuBLbC3DaATYNXQh73LLWT66swCJNjm9wMPrzWZ9LMnhSlwjd27NDRDyVnEPp v357tXnSKQ0y9nXFfa4ZChEpbh5Er321wtVZerzqWCXEhYsekCcc/Qap+ZSyshhD 0tecwT49Yj41Q4BMAZwoFLDqywDZUS+csgJNdJkhbOsnuQYy7w2HOWR7KJ6ob9VU VIIP8NikETMyXZ/veKqJF6iZnfwgLF++rkrT7JmErikg+3scPU9vHWJMOEObnWw= =38Un -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_AC29A5E8-5C73-4F13-BD19-409D4EC3418A-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 15:41:28 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD4DA400; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 15:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gilb.zs64.net (gilb.zs64.net [212.12.50.234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gilb.zs64.net", Issuer "Cryptonomicore CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EE9714C2; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 15:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gilb.zs64.net (Postfix, from stb@lassitu.de) id 58027132D24; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 15:41:26 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2486DD29-968A-4EEB-902F-2DBD21567226"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: lang/tlc86: missing standard modules? From: Stefan Bethke In-Reply-To: <6FCE12CD-81A7-4D7E-AABE-882CDB9BB479@lassitu.de> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 17:40:20 +0200 Message-Id: <003F73DC-593B-4760-A382-8BB130A2862A@lassitu.de> References: <6FCE12CD-81A7-4D7E-AABE-882CDB9BB479@lassitu.de> To: gahr@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 15:41:28 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_2486DD29-968A-4EEB-902F-2DBD21567226 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Am 31.08.2014 um 17:32 schrieb Stefan Bethke : > Hey, >=20 > since the update to tcl86-8.6.2, I=92m getting this error trace: > can't find package msgcat 1.4 > while executing > "package require msgcat 1.4" > ("uplevel" body line 2) > invoked from within > "uplevel \#0 { > package require msgcat 1.4 > if { $::tcl_platform(platform) eq {windows} } { > if { [catch { package require registry 1.1 }] } { > ..." > (file "/usr/local/lib/tcl8.6/clock.tcl" line 21) > invoked from within > "source -encoding utf-8 [file join $TclLibDir clock.tcl]" > (procedure "::tcl::clock::format" line 3) > invoked from within > "clock format [clock seconds] -gmt 1 -format "\"updated %Y%m%d = %H%M%S\""" > (procedure "update_zone" line 27) > invoked from within > "update_zone $host $ip=93 >=20 > As far as I can tell, msgcat should be included with Tcl. Botched = install, or is the port broken? >=20 > I=92m going to try a downgrade next. Downgrading the port to r366509 / 8.6.1 unbreaks my Tcl script. I was at = r366676 before. Stefan --=20 Stefan Bethke Fon +49 151 14070811 --Apple-Mail=_2486DD29-968A-4EEB-902F-2DBD21567226 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUA0HlAAoJEA/POViuFuLBljIH/0R7BZMXcPO7PPc8YnCU4NQB iYfNI6fa8fyBDMZdyoLPToUIBOeUwP4M77AnfVw/Og4j4Iv/6IgGOv5kEG8Pw5Jz CrudEnIyYfGhHaXejve8ScQc62pd0VLgFWVerjBJAIZ9sgTiDcQz/Zjm7oKUBQtn 6K39qIOg4OrrHTbTKvQU5oDE6QmxBYfu/lFfShhYrUDuUZFkpW+YTHBjuGYOLBlg uInrkTgRHV8AWnR7HfQBVqrEwIGkEfNReyn2KCGg19KMDEUz0V4WMvHCKiKy+eS8 DDVxH0ituOLfLfU5cpPPNVhdg9qfNMgsv0aogfPzLIMShKENmJlhg6njgcctJ9U= =X8gA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_2486DD29-968A-4EEB-902F-2DBD21567226-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 15:44:32 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55E7E4A4; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 15:44:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-x22d.google.com (mail-qg0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D819114D6; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 15:44:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id e89so4262960qgf.32 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 08:44:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=zTKVEsUag4AVsmcKwxZhdQiuSYXXafKaYxH/4v9NPXM=; b=0lgKBUVepVWqhtjbUJ/c8d8UU54udxWSJhmXHLKqGA7E+1Hce293AYBju4r9VjBxJ0 yWt8XMHDmLKaoMJYwVrNblodgoeGI5hzFgqVBEiXBxymLZXq2GEaIuwY0eDt8JIf2OHr g2lRvx9BIWI3xlHqXDk+sSd7OAs4XsRCqfqXBrOe8omlmSqiJVhafb0RTgPnHtyKlfHs sUB6PP46UIB9mgKk1Juxme7zX2qjBh6AcMZmn0TOkqAFMiiENTexx2t2qsiH/2MFDAJs u95CTV6LBnh0xjiPvUQNu9PcKBnkQnue0fQKGn3Y6rPovbaRnpPbPCuLh9Xf/9Zc1PkN nqlQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.36.4 with SMTP id r4mr37265039qad.69.1409499871037; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 08:44:31 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.39.139 with HTTP; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 08:44:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5402DE49.4020900@orange.fr> References: <1409238190.56909.YahooMailNeo@web140904.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <53FF6A32.6020509@freebsd.org> <5402C685.1030507@freebsd.org> <5402DE49.4020900@orange.fr> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 08:44:30 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 87N3epcsJP0WV66CtZmHGM8vss8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Analyzed] Re: Problem with xorg From: Adrian Chadd To: Claude Buisson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" , x11@freebsd.org, Ports FreeBSD , Filippo Moretti X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 15:44:32 -0000 I discovered that: * if I don't load kbdmap at boot-time as a module, the probe order works in a way that xorg works; * if I load kbdmap by hand after boot, or I don't load it at all, then even the US keyboard map causes xorg to choke. If I load kbdmap at boot-time then kbdcontrol reports inappropriate ioctl for device. -a From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 15:59:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B6DD8E8; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 15:59:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gilb.zs64.net (gilb.zs64.net [IPv6:2a00:14b0:4200:32e0::1ea]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gilb.zs64.net", Issuer "Cryptonomicore CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C11711747; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 15:59:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gilb.zs64.net (Postfix, from stb@lassitu.de) id 4A682132DB6; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 15:59:21 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D0919315-ECFD-4EC7-9432-4660CB009C17"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: lang/tlc86: missing standard modules? From: Stefan Bethke In-Reply-To: <003F73DC-593B-4760-A382-8BB130A2862A@lassitu.de> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 17:58:15 +0200 Message-Id: References: <6FCE12CD-81A7-4D7E-AABE-882CDB9BB479@lassitu.de> <003F73DC-593B-4760-A382-8BB130A2862A@lassitu.de> To: gahr@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 15:59:25 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_D0919315-ECFD-4EC7-9432-4660CB009C17 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Am 31.08.2014 um 17:40 schrieb Stefan Bethke : >=20 > Am 31.08.2014 um 17:32 schrieb Stefan Bethke : >=20 >> Hey, >>=20 >> since the update to tcl86-8.6.2, I=92m getting this error trace: >> can't find package msgcat 1.4 >> while executing >> "package require msgcat 1.4" >> ("uplevel" body line 2) >> invoked from within >> "uplevel \#0 { >> package require msgcat 1.4 >> if { $::tcl_platform(platform) eq {windows} } { >> if { [catch { package require registry 1.1 }] } { >> ..." >> (file "/usr/local/lib/tcl8.6/clock.tcl" line 21) >> invoked from within >> "source -encoding utf-8 [file join $TclLibDir clock.tcl]" >> (procedure "::tcl::clock::format" line 3) >> invoked from within >> "clock format [clock seconds] -gmt 1 -format "\"updated %Y%m%d = %H%M%S\""" >> (procedure "update_zone" line 27) >> invoked from within >> "update_zone $host $ip=93 >>=20 >> As far as I can tell, msgcat should be included with Tcl. Botched = install, or is the port broken? >>=20 >> I=92m going to try a downgrade next. >=20 > Downgrading the port to r366509 / 8.6.1 unbreaks my Tcl script. I was = at r366676 before. I=92ve filed https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D193207, = which includes a simple test case. Stefan --=20 Stefan Bethke Fon +49 151 14070811 --Apple-Mail=_D0919315-ECFD-4EC7-9432-4660CB009C17 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUA0YXAAoJEA/POViuFuLBN8AH/0sVl16NPahGXEuT4RIK+PNA 5rRtR5FE5bZMuz5NZ1Dwh+W7rZx+DtIwGrs3A4OlerM1hVHbir990TjxVzVTx7uV RH950dOsDNvGUJ7q9faD7ys17yYDtozk6qV2656z9hx6XFp8hdtAS5mgx0O4MODI I39+GYbHYC9aPzs9y/EBa3WyUzjn+CTv6yAJSnlCu8bHY4oQdh57/oFgJ/eDK7xX 76+RR90VOCUFvxAsd39vku1UIY1XOEyVKHGKl0dZuyDa+PcZ72tMIOsVdIMAZTwC 5FEaco7qaNylgSAohKQ+r3yMbE67v6qL2DREDjO+L9OxlI1KX2nviFp+YzaAqcc= =or3+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_D0919315-ECFD-4EC7-9432-4660CB009C17-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 17:43:30 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 442056D4 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 17:43:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x22f.google.com (mail-la0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1EC312DC for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 17:43:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id s18so5068309lam.34 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 10:43:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=UmC0c/sK9THbHeNGi3IkrVfSr1WeTnhxVJe7U54MSOg=; b=wqcs55yx2gDP07shECZnQiohwlFPfraX4YaESKTwK2F9qJwhG5MtXZYzURugMTmKCr LNeU3M8yM4wU753TrhMRqlphjRh+OY20FXWrjPgh9uAtbWZTNjtJrf+eAzg0F7cGAS1N bQBb2dBgCQ6SCEsrb2U5wxOZuAKvmK+ok2k2UT9ONjfNjjxNVoueg7lRlwAVF1aUqag6 Wbcd6mtShRcmIWo5LGeH1kaEurpfma7lFo05fzpJM4osMDlukky160310ZYnkMMolhCx QjxV36nw0AbXjob1uSgVpsJLVqqfdt+k3CZpeqieJxqYLjH/GW5f75yXX+aAM7obAEeZ jEng== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.210.138 with SMTP id mu10mr3298258lbc.81.1409507007571; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 10:43:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.24.196 with HTTP; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 10:43:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140828142610.6dc3b78d@X220.alogt.com> References: <20140828142610.6dc3b78d@X220.alogt.com> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 19:43:27 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: I want to upgrade an old (8.3-RC2) FReeBSD installation, but can't install subversion From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 17:43:30 -0000 On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > I did not got through the full thread to see if you found a solution. Yes, I did. In fact, freebsd-update provided the solution; I used it to upgrade to FreeBSD 8.4-release: root@kg-vm2# uname -a FreeBSD kg-vm2 8.4-RELEASE-p14 FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE-p14 #0: Tue Jul 8 12:41:46 UTC 2014 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 and since the machine now is on a supported version, the ports tree works again, and I installed subversion and used that to get the latest FreeBSD 8-stable source on the machine, and used that to update the machine to FreeBSD 8.4-stable. HTH -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 18:16:52 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC43812F for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 18:16:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x235.google.com (mail-ig0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87F2117A5 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 18:16:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f181.google.com with SMTP id h15so4834279igd.2 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 11:16:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=9zr3OP+EMBGzlelfmlcv74YiKx5oPRx0XJTGqzRTJ0M=; b=k9QBhfTbceI7DvWsxKBziVgJHJ0Mit/WrB5aY45EgA+t8pR9BjfmKmb/KxTxvoF992 9GE8c5bDpvLGLO34mdm0ecijs6PcOghisPlV/lOCMVrAPHVjdkGNIz5z6kLabLW/lwB9 Ao/Kc0Y/0xTcpp5BND70AxliR2si+TadtKHdFSHa79MFWelO7VxgkFTYvD5nvwVwTiey 1FmeyXVBMoScRPlcJQc8nmYi8cHaW04c7QAh7RGgQ8wPpy0/BoZeBytknp4h2dcNqLTo MlofOsg7X3qrD6PpL+WrikeqcadunJeM+pbaq/8fJ2fV195cgAnaAFzcscKbMCQw/xHH Ax5w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.43.193 with SMTP id y1mr16652472igl.32.1409509011947; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 11:16:51 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.163.148 with HTTP; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 11:16:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140831075059.GW9400@home.opsec.eu> References: <5401F646.6030304@lunabase.org> <20140830175001.GS9400@home.opsec.eu> <54023CF9.1040002@lunabase.org> <20140830212321.GV9400@home.opsec.eu> <540250CF.5010803@lunabase.org> <20140831075059.GW9400@home.opsec.eu> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 11:16:51 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: eFKO6B7coi3ndk4xecUuD41baBQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to submit a port update? From: Kevin Oberman To: Kurt Jaeger Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: Ted Faber , FreeBSD Ports ML X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 18:16:52 -0000 On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 12:50 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > The update is mostly some small changes to the code to eliminate clang++ > > and recent g++ warnings along with Eric's typo, which has been > > languishing for a while. I know it's a small thing, but seeing those > > warnings when I compile the port makes me sad. Obviously you guys can > > reject if you don't feel it's worth it. > > Well, it's always nice to check process and procedures while it's > not time-critical 8-} > > And you are right, the porters handbook still mentions send-pr. > > There is one thing which is very nice to have for an incoming PR: > poudriere test logs that prove that the updated port builds cleanly. > Or redports. Not everyone has a running poudriere setup and anyone can use redports. Now that I have my new server on-line, I may finally get around to building poudriere, myself, but until then, redports is all I have available. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 18:37:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3080E825 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 18:37:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C9B21990 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 18:37:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.101] ([87.139.233.65]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M4kfR-1YMSiy02aT-00yx1Z; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 20:37:45 +0200 Message-ID: <54036B7E.4040504@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 20:37:50 +0200 From: olli hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Ports ML Subject: Re: I want to upgrade an old (8.3-RC2) FReeBSD installation, but can't install subversion References: <20140828142610.6dc3b78d@X220.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:nI77hbcciXBDrGMVPGDTZZoX1b0NxKKAtRG9rwnXBYinpgwrOrG DRIWJH+jzGUBBqok6zXFQgOXrOhly9X4zb1WiM9ED4W6oo8q100ZuMl7LnFQH/zbXJXbAVJ SfYYMnLxjHPMmDF1r7HAbqN8pO7N4J7S9F8umB/NIoiMFJ2wroO6k3+IhPfPTbfPahT5pXE tUejSa/Bsa9pLTJx/L7RQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Cc: Torfinn Ingolfsen X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 18:37:55 -0000 On 2014-08-31 19:43, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Erich Dollansky > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I did not got through the full thread to see if you found a solution. > > Yes, I did. In fact, freebsd-update provided the solution; I used it > to upgrade to FreeBSD 8.4-release: > root@kg-vm2# uname -a > FreeBSD kg-vm2 8.4-RELEASE-p14 FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE-p14 #0: Tue Jul 8 > 12:41:46 UTC 2014 > root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > and since the machine now is on a supported version, the ports tree > works again, and I installed subversion and > used that to get the latest FreeBSD 8-stable source on the machine, > and used that to update the machine to FreeBSD 8.4-stable. Hm, do you mean update with subversion to 8.4-stable or 8.4-current? Unless you have a non default kernel there is no need to rebuild to get 8.4-stable, just run `freebsd-update fetch install' without '-r ...' and you are done. Rebuilding the system from source can break freebsd-update specially if build with custom optimizations (-O...) Anyway good to hear you managed to get your system to a supported release. -- olli From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 19:23:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BF85448 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 19:23:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "neonpark.inter-sonic.com", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5006E1E1D for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 19:23:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at BSDLabs AB Message-ID: <54037489.3090806@intersonic.se> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 21:16:25 +0200 From: Per olof Ljungmark Organization: Intersonic AB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: cannot build pecl-pdflib Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 19:23:39 -0000 10-PRERELEASE fresh portstree # make ===> License PHP30 accepted by the user ===> pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 for building ===> Extracting for pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for PECL/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz. ===> Refetch for 1 more times files: PECL/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz ===> License PHP30 accepted by the user ===> pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found => pdflib-3.0.4.tgz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/PECL. => Attempting to fetch http://pecl.php.net/get/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz fetch: http://pecl.php.net/get/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz: size unknown fetch: http://pecl.php.net/get/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz: size of remote file is not known pdflib-3.0.4.tgz 3582 B 30 kBps 00m01s => Fetched file size mismatch (expected 27043, actual 3582) => Attempting to fetch http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/ports-distfiles/PECL/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz pdflib-3.0.4.tgz 100% of 26 kB 417 kBps 00m00s ===> Fetching all distfiles required by pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 for building ===> License PHP30 accepted by the user ===> pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 for building => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for PECL/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz. ===> Giving up on fetching files: PECL/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file (/usr/ports/print/pecl-pdflib/distinfo) are up to date. If you are absolutely sure you want to override this check, type "make NO_CHECKSUM=yes [other args]". *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/print/pecl-pdflib Well, tried: # make NO_CHECKSUM=yes ===> License PHP30 accepted by the user ===> pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 for building ===> Extracting for pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 tar: Error opening archive: Unrecognized archive format *** Error code 1 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 19:32:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEBD2880 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 19:32:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "neonpark.inter-sonic.com", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B094A1F1A for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 19:32:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at BSDLabs AB Message-ID: <54037833.1080603@intersonic.se> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 21:32:03 +0200 From: Per olof Ljungmark Organization: Intersonic AB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cannot build pecl-pdflib References: <54037489.3090806@intersonic.se> In-Reply-To: <54037489.3090806@intersonic.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 19:32:10 -0000 On 08/31/14 21:16, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > 10-PRERELEASE > fresh portstree > > # make > ===> License PHP30 accepted by the user > ===> pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > ===> Fetching all distfiles required by pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 for building > ===> Extracting for pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 > => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for PECL/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz. > ===> Refetch for 1 more times files: PECL/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz > ===> License PHP30 accepted by the user > ===> pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > => pdflib-3.0.4.tgz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/PECL. > => Attempting to fetch http://pecl.php.net/get/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz > fetch: http://pecl.php.net/get/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz: size unknown > fetch: http://pecl.php.net/get/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz: size of remote file is > not known > pdflib-3.0.4.tgz 3582 B 30 kBps > 00m01s > => Fetched file size mismatch (expected 27043, actual 3582) > => Attempting to fetch > http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/ports-distfiles/PECL/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz > pdflib-3.0.4.tgz 100% of 26 kB 417 kBps > 00m00s > ===> Fetching all distfiles required by pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 for building > ===> License PHP30 accepted by the user > ===> pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > ===> Fetching all distfiles required by pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 for building > => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for PECL/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz. > ===> Giving up on fetching files: PECL/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz > Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file > (/usr/ports/print/pecl-pdflib/distinfo) > are up to date. If you are absolutely sure you want to override this > check, type "make NO_CHECKSUM=yes [other args]". > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/print/pecl-pdflib > > > Well, tried: > > # make NO_CHECKSUM=yes > ===> License PHP30 accepted by the user > ===> pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > ===> Fetching all distfiles required by pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 for building > ===> Extracting for pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 > tar: Error opening archive: Unrecognized archive format > *** Error code 1 works if file is fetched from elsewhere, for instance: http://ftp.leg.uct.ac.za/pub/packages/macports/distfiles/php5-pdflib/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 19:44:08 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED316D56 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 19:44:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bolton.dan.me.uk (smtp.dan.me.uk [IPv6:2001:67c:26b4:9:21e:bff:fec7:87a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.dan.me.uk", Issuer "RapidSSL CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EC921078 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 19:44:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2a01:348:61:0:e8b:fdff:fe32:e2b8] ([IPv6:2a01:348:61:0:e8b:fdff:fe32:e2b8]) (authenticated bits=0 user=danmail mech=PLAIN) by bolton.dan.me.uk (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s7VJi34n048167 (server= [] version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT subject=) for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 20:44:03 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from me@dan.me.uk) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dan.me.uk; s=default; t=1409514243; bh=SGrIQo3OJZyZdtEq2uhc01Q98IGtn0kVw852KE9n1kk=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=az9VbvEgdLJBcwPUWYylOz2OdQDn3Xm6LvpcTv4BN+uC71VEW8oPWheiqypwzNEPD PK/FTSNpSoaO2KKfw2+gqqdcxaapH10w16QQDdRCqOqoINCCqaoabnsIz/VHCCxrLG Qh5o8C8G+3QThwd4O21HphK28iQy/FXmUVdZ7we3C7QRReRi/sT00qoyBlFCJDe5uW m84P6gCWmkOyScbIeMjFkfw3tLrzcnBy7GF7bOtkRhfBb9na44TkL/NzZdxlqeEpGI xZLbC9yDCNYUxB8ROZ2hAICbcJ+YUXWYEHtWMhGzuU/MEHyWtR/aLLVrxHSmdE1ZQb ugzl512f4C84g== Message-ID: <54037B0A.70300@dan.me.uk> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 20:44:10 +0100 From: Daniel Austin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cannot build pecl-pdflib References: <54037489.3090806@intersonic.se> In-Reply-To: <54037489.3090806@intersonic.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: Scanned by F-PROT Antivirus (http://www.f-prot.com) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 19:44:08 -0000 Hi, root@bolton:/usr/ports/distfiles/PECL # fetch http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/ports-distfiles/PECL/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz pdflib-3.0.4.tgz 100% of 26 kB 6627 kBps 00m00s root@bolton:/usr/ports/distfiles/PECL # cd /usr/ports/print/pecl-pdflib root@bolton:/usr/ports/print/pecl-pdflib # make checksum ===> License PHP30 accepted by the user ===> pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 for building => SHA256 Checksum OK for PECL/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz. It's working fine here (from both pecl.php.net and distcache.FreeBSD.org) It looks like you have something that's altering your downloaded data causing it to fail the checksum (perhaps a firewall or proxy appliance) Thanks, Dan. On 31/08/2014 20:16, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > 10-PRERELEASE > fresh portstree > > # make > ===> License PHP30 accepted by the user > ===> pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > ===> Fetching all distfiles required by pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 for building > ===> Extracting for pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 > => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for PECL/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz. > ===> Refetch for 1 more times files: PECL/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz > ===> License PHP30 accepted by the user > ===> pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > => pdflib-3.0.4.tgz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/PECL. > => Attempting to fetch http://pecl.php.net/get/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz > fetch: http://pecl.php.net/get/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz: size unknown > fetch: http://pecl.php.net/get/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz: size of remote file is > not known > pdflib-3.0.4.tgz 3582 B 30 kBps > 00m01s > => Fetched file size mismatch (expected 27043, actual 3582) > => Attempting to fetch > http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/ports-distfiles/PECL/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz > pdflib-3.0.4.tgz 100% of 26 kB 417 kBps > 00m00s > ===> Fetching all distfiles required by pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 for building > ===> License PHP30 accepted by the user > ===> pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > ===> Fetching all distfiles required by pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 for building > => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for PECL/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz. > ===> Giving up on fetching files: PECL/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz > Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file > (/usr/ports/print/pecl-pdflib/distinfo) > are up to date. If you are absolutely sure you want to override this > check, type "make NO_CHECKSUM=yes [other args]". > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/print/pecl-pdflib > > > Well, tried: > > # make NO_CHECKSUM=yes > ===> License PHP30 accepted by the user > ===> pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > ===> Fetching all distfiles required by pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 for building > ===> Extracting for pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 > tar: Error opening archive: Unrecognized archive format > *** Error code 1 > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 20:17:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DB8E9F1 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 20:17:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "neonpark.inter-sonic.com", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 166701445 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 20:17:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at BSDLabs AB Message-ID: <540382C6.3070703@intersonic.se> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 22:17:10 +0200 From: Per olof Ljungmark Organization: Intersonic AB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Austin , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cannot build pecl-pdflib References: <54037489.3090806@intersonic.se> <54037B0A.70300@dan.me.uk> In-Reply-To: <54037B0A.70300@dan.me.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 20:17:17 -0000 On 08/31/14 21:44, Daniel Austin via freebsd-ports wrote: > Hi, > > root@bolton:/usr/ports/distfiles/PECL # fetch > http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/ports-distfiles/PECL/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz > pdflib-3.0.4.tgz 100% of 26 kB 6627 kBps > 00m00s > root@bolton:/usr/ports/distfiles/PECL # cd /usr/ports/print/pecl-pdflib > root@bolton:/usr/ports/print/pecl-pdflib # make checksum > ===> License PHP30 accepted by the user > ===> pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > ===> Fetching all distfiles required by pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 for building > => SHA256 Checksum OK for PECL/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz. > > It's working fine here (from both pecl.php.net and distcache.FreeBSD.org) > > It looks like you have something that's altering your downloaded data > causing it to fail the checksum (perhaps a firewall or proxy appliance) > Not sure, http://pecl.php.net/package/pdflib was down (database error) at the very moment I was building the port and the package from distcache.FreeBSD.org did not work. Now that pecl.php.net is up again it builds fine. Perhaps the distfile at freebsd.org needs to be checked. > On 31/08/2014 20:16, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: >> 10-PRERELEASE >> fresh portstree >> >> # make >> ===> License PHP30 accepted by the user >> ===> pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found >> ===> Fetching all distfiles required by pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 for building >> ===> Extracting for pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 >> => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for PECL/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz. >> ===> Refetch for 1 more times files: PECL/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz >> ===> License PHP30 accepted by the user >> ===> pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found >> => pdflib-3.0.4.tgz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/PECL. >> => Attempting to fetch http://pecl.php.net/get/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz >> fetch: http://pecl.php.net/get/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz: size unknown >> fetch: http://pecl.php.net/get/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz: size of remote file is >> not known >> pdflib-3.0.4.tgz 3582 B 30 kBps >> 00m01s >> => Fetched file size mismatch (expected 27043, actual 3582) >> => Attempting to fetch >> http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/ports-distfiles/PECL/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz >> pdflib-3.0.4.tgz 100% of 26 kB 417 kBps >> 00m00s >> ===> Fetching all distfiles required by pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 for building >> ===> License PHP30 accepted by the user >> ===> pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found >> ===> Fetching all distfiles required by pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 for building >> => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for PECL/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz. >> ===> Giving up on fetching files: PECL/pdflib-3.0.4.tgz >> Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file >> (/usr/ports/print/pecl-pdflib/distinfo) >> are up to date. If you are absolutely sure you want to override this >> check, type "make NO_CHECKSUM=yes [other args]". >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop. >> make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/print/pecl-pdflib >> >> >> Well, tried: >> >> # make NO_CHECKSUM=yes >> ===> License PHP30 accepted by the user >> ===> pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found >> ===> Fetching all distfiles required by pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 for building >> ===> Extracting for pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 >> tar: Error opening archive: Unrecognized archive format >> *** Error code 1 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Intersonic AB Registered in Solna, Sweden SE556539368201 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 20:38:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B681576 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 20:38:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x236.google.com (mail-lb0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1405017B4 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 20:38:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id u10so5017751lbd.27 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 13:38:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=21gFY9EEWlM15BnpxfFOvfq6xuCa6qggG8AW1VkGu8Y=; b=PbSgLdGCpJgom3fiViQU8H17/dBB0VX140BetlSrC2vjA5kwqH/kTyVviixbiXVQc/ 6BPwSkGDTh+HEqnntiYoPXcx6wWpJH+N3aOT1Z6dD9FrpfLsxTB0VUbCgaPdSGLE9PoT E0VkRICw7Ygy+HciEoGu8kVzoKAesiDWaQOtgqN+HWqT0+81Chm4W4nvhAz+oNxJG0B1 kP0XDuBb1QR7uKlNf0CII1aQx0k641cn8bdPNnjuu9QEkjr6DonR0VmaCodAYWeryLIs Yi0xG8+vyq0CWu5MTfv6b7x/mu44gZ7hhEEXrjBmaE+HiXkQREn9Rk6FsgGIAaHwysZf VsIQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.134.101 with SMTP id pj5mr23138224lbb.47.1409517531811; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 13:38:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.24.196 with HTTP; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 13:38:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <54036B7E.4040504@gmx.de> References: <20140828142610.6dc3b78d@X220.alogt.com> <54036B7E.4040504@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 22:38:51 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: I want to upgrade an old (8.3-RC2) FReeBSD installation, but can't install subversion From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 20:38:55 -0000 On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 8:37 PM, olli hauer wrote: > > Hm, do you mean update with subversion to 8.4-stable or 8.4-current? Yes, and 8.4-stable. There is no 8.4-current. > Unless you have a non default kernel there is no need to rebuild to get 8.4-stable, just run `freebsd-update fetch install' without '-r ...' and you are done. Ok. Old habits came into play; I've always updated my FreeBSD systems via source. It is that freebsd-update which is new to me... > Rebuilding the system from source can break freebsd-update specially if build with custom optimizations (-O...) Noted. In my case, using freebsd-update was only to get out of the "ports tree suddenly not supported" situation I got into. > Anyway good to hear you managed to get your system to a supported release. Yes. :) -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 31 20:57:40 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACC88C44 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 20:57:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 442F71978 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 20:57:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.101] ([87.139.233.65]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M9s2y-1XZDkv2xsu-00B6Fs; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 22:57:37 +0200 Message-ID: <54038C47.8040003@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 22:57:43 +0200 From: olli hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Ports ML Subject: Re: I want to upgrade an old (8.3-RC2) FReeBSD installation, but can't install subversion References: <20140828142610.6dc3b78d@X220.alogt.com> <54036B7E.4040504@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:f4g7Pw+TkaZuOGxH3CcJoklCK4hzb7Px0E9Z1YA8CdeaV8x3hgB VyEFB7C4QJpskaxIU/lk8xqslSIYY+NtQZe6o85axH6BmFZ6hvCVkPwoZs7OucDxKw2R/uG alWgMSDiYXqlZTz/Xew7cfi/lvEJ9JWF68BCkrXAW4hFj+g16CMEbEKkITEGoLSnHiAtVKM 9xDMW2PO3++m7u0bvq+jg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Cc: Torfinn Ingolfsen X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 20:57:40 -0000 On 2014-08-31 22:38, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 8:37 PM, olli hauer wrote: >> >> Hm, do you mean update with subversion to 8.4-stable or 8.4-current? > > Yes, and 8.4-stable. There is no 8.4-current. > >> Unless you have a non default kernel there is no need to rebuild to get 8.4-stable, just run `freebsd-update fetch install' without '-r ...' and you are done. > > Ok. Old habits came into play; I've always updated my FreeBSD systems > via source. It is that freebsd-update which is new to me... > > >> Rebuilding the system from source can break freebsd-update specially if build with custom optimizations (-O...) > > Noted. In my case, using freebsd-update was only to get out of the > "ports tree suddenly not supported" situation I got into. > >> Anyway good to hear you managed to get your system to a supported release. > > Yes. :) > If you have the time / resources setup a small test jail/vm with an older release to play with freebsd-update try it out. In case there is a security update or other fix for stable freebsd-update will lift your system with one or two commands to the new stable version. freebsd-update updates not only the OS but also /usr/src Once you've done that you will love it. PS: After using freebsd-update the directory "/var/db/freebsd-update" and your system is running stable you can cleanup everything inside "/var/db/freebsd-update" to save some space. -- olli From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 09:27:06 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D0CC89E for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 09:27:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com (mail-wi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 137CE1F28 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 09:27:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id d1so12229305wiv.13 for ; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 02:27:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:user-agent; bh=pX2fJMyr539yfi+g7A08YjGeWJPydJxrqo8VA2X5FZs=; b=MARZERCBjhOhhCJyElMdQNSN5CJsFP/w10dl6J6m6Dhp3J34LjqBN7fulp3EOeKzvC p2FUD9jPUHaBk6UUayDMAy8xnm7ioYmvS0pLVP00aj8rTm5yEbx70lnJVUbGFNZ7A189 dU9ZXb9mobE4HLgcGkXwW7Tqlbw4sqU6Q418yXKIjOo8hTwY6YEe8T496mWH096Yu1Kz fpyNeUaWt9wHdpHMIXb/t5UWNsjh866X4sqjaowYwsS3FC9vC/QYlLiSokmdv+P17GTp G916WLcOx9uHMSRPW+EOnDQx9rvzhu2RZt480Q291SxnyMGRmdRv0rr15bgO1kyX7eT5 LqrQ== X-Received: by 10.195.13.34 with SMTP id ev2mr29848064wjd.55.1409563623398; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 02:27:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id au4sm768354wjc.15.2014.09.01.02.27.02 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 01 Sep 2014 02:27:02 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 11:27:00 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: [HEADSUP] The ports tree is now stage only Message-ID: <20140901092700.GB92321@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="E39vaYmALEf/7YXx" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 09:27:06 -0000 --E39vaYmALEf/7YXx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi all, The ports tree is now fully staged (only 2% has been left unstaged, marked as broken and will be removed from the ports tree if no PR to stage them are pending in bugzilla). I would like to thank every committer and maintainers for their work on staging! It allowed us to convert more than 23k packages to support stage in only 11 months! Staging is a very important state, it allows us to right now be able to run quality testing scripts on the packages (which already allowed to fix tons of hidden problems) and it allows use to be able to build packages as a regular user! It also opens the gates to new features that users have been requesting for many years: - flavors - multiple packages Expect those features to happen in the near future. Best regards, Bapt on behalf of portmgr --E39vaYmALEf/7YXx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlQEO+QACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzpogCfVz+O4V/itNYIN7ZX78GMBrYK AdwAnjOfID+teal6VVCL1j48vlhaztic =+JwP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --E39vaYmALEf/7YXx-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 10:59:40 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B8C591F for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 10:59:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57DD71A75 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 10:59:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s81AxevX080637 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 10:59:40 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id s81AxeqI080636; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 10:59:40 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201409011059.s81AxeqI080636@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 10:59:40 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 10:59:40 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ audio/oss | 4.2-build2009 | 4.2-build2010 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ graphics/libgphoto2 | 2.5.4 | 2.5.5.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 15:09:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C29BBB2A for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 15:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp9.dnsxperta.com (smtp9.dnsxperta.com [194.143.202.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D2301810 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 15:09:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.163] (unknown [217.13.80.178]) by smtp9.dnsxperta.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1C4C7229575 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 17:00:52 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <54048A33.2080404@digitalvalue.es> Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 17:01:07 +0200 From: Juanjo Garcia User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: lang/php56 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 15:09:47 -0000 PHP 5.6 was released last month. Is there any update scheduled? Thanks in advance. -- Documento sin título Juanjo Garcia Digital Value S.L. http://www.digitalvalue.es Tel. 96.316.20.89 Fax 96.373.85.07 Ausias March 104, Accs. - Valencia - From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 15:31:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34E1B294 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 15:31:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com (mail-wi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFC001A21 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 15:31:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id cc10so6310638wib.10 for ; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 08:30:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=T8rZ1Z2NdCN7OrichB4ISKZA5rQhOyXZwLEnrBSpJio=; b=rE4Z/TqCS/Gz6FUMtJkD8wWTs1xQsnSi9t/3aR59jGStaPruzj1ryLaTnwADB5F1B5 bEv7S42Ur3j9VNw+oOuMl6vVMdfxCimv+W8YDXsgr0LG/ikH2zyCU89Va5Boh7uDyzwj flOidugkOFVY1YlfD6vytSSUz+Df7WJ7HL5FoV/vDe0ei4KhhVLSeVRM0/ODIebIDGpo k3ZODvPW89lW6AmVJqPWT7I3ZaQMNIOg7dgVOg7eNSwEuDmUjidL0qSdt2frKsEkvO9I XzIJZ8e5FsX/vWzsaixJkND/SEVtDKfdrc5bSVgMbuJLoojJKXJase5YxvltWsd6qfQt o0Bw== X-Received: by 10.180.36.236 with SMTP id t12mr22930224wij.38.1409585456936; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 08:30:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.36] (LAubervilliers-656-01-65-50.w82-127.abo.wanadoo.fr. [82.127.90.50]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id s1sm26581143wiw.6.2014.09.01.08.30.56 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 01 Sep 2014 08:30:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54049130.7060307@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 17:30:56 +0200 From: David Demelier User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] The ports tree is now stage only References: <20140901092700.GB92321@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20140901092700.GB92321@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 15:31:02 -0000 Le 01/09/2014 11:27, Baptiste Daroussin a écrit : > Hi all, > > The ports tree is now fully staged (only 2% has been left unstaged, marked as > broken and will be removed from the ports tree if no PR to stage them are > pending in bugzilla). > > I would like to thank every committer and maintainers for their work on staging! > It allowed us to convert more than 23k packages to support stage in only 11 > months! > > Staging is a very important state, it allows us to right now be able to run > quality testing scripts on the packages (which already allowed to fix tons of > hidden problems) and it allows use to be able to build packages as a regular > user! > > It also opens the gates to new features that users have been requesting for many > years: > - flavors > - multiple packages > > Expect those features to happen in the near future. > > Best regards, > Bapt on behalf of portmgr > Congratulations :-) Bapt, one of the FreeBSD god. Never stop your awesome work on FreeBSD. Cheers, From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 17:41:46 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD30F3EA for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 17:41:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.grem.de (outcast.grem.de [213.239.217.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 25D061962 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 17:41:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19739 invoked by uid 89); 1 Sep 2014 17:41:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bsd64.grem.de) (mg@grem.de@194.97.158.66) by mail.grem.de with ESMTPA; 1 Sep 2014 17:41:36 -0000 Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 19:41:34 +0200 From: Michael Gmelin To: Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] The ports tree is now stage only Message-ID: <20140901194134.0391890f@bsd64.grem.de> In-Reply-To: <20140901092700.GB92321@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20140901092700.GB92321@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/F1fyRQSAFN0S9if4HuSO6cM"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 17:41:46 -0000 --Sig_/F1fyRQSAFN0S9if4HuSO6cM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 11:27:00 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > The ports tree is now fully staged (only 2% has been left unstaged, > marked as broken and will be removed from the ports tree if no PR to > stage them are pending in bugzilla). >=20 > I would like to thank every committer and maintainers for their work > on staging! It allowed us to convert more than 23k packages to > support stage in only 11 months! >=20 > Staging is a very important state, it allows us to right now be able > to run quality testing scripts on the packages (which already allowed > to fix tons of hidden problems) and it allows use to be able to build > packages as a regular user! >=20 > It also opens the gates to new features that users have been > requesting for many years: > - flavors > - multiple packages >=20 > Expect those features to happen in the near future. >=20 > Best regards, > Bapt on behalf of portmgr >=20 Impressive effort and totally worth it. Could you maybe publish the list of all ports that didn't make it on the wiki (e.g. at https://wiki.freebsd.org/ports/StageDir)? --=20 Michael Gmelin --Sig_/F1fyRQSAFN0S9if4HuSO6cM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJUBK/RXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRFODQyNDA4MjEyRDI3NjdBRTI5RUZDQTQ2 ODk3RjhDMTZCRkFGRjlGAAoJEGiX+MFr+v+fwxwH/ig4m2JF00EuRCi59Uvb5YkS FVlvdRIwsgwTgVQI+Dnb7XDi1l6wM1Jtr7b/6+B+8AP2ye2XLcSgbnyhYb6YFhXY +RXgRQAO2uMfK8ItsDoUSTyKi84sZpWeojTM0wQbqbKzsszc32H0HvIqIykONJRG N4DO2xkRkKpw2Ls9gnubwqbJ/i97d927O4UgCccx2ANQdwhryi94WskIUD6+KQbP sldlun3VHHkXRSMOq9zo17pGjL1YzuBbikgXwB9o+3HuRydGJ+xNVN2QI+0FIjLp x0SkImKuynf+Jsic1tK8JAo0I0yakpPh2X66RZqmiTPWzFs+FEUN+ZDr5UsBlkI= =8Blz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/F1fyRQSAFN0S9if4HuSO6cM-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 17:51:51 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12A7694F; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 17:51:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from qat.redports.org (qat.redports.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6420::233:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D71BC1A6E; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 17:51:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redports.org; s=04012012; h=Sender:Message-Id:To:Subject:Reply-To:Date:To:Cc:From:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=DafPRbZvbqPuyFTylXywctuNWd2M9txoaRJzdqT00xI=; b=jYRuSV5dVrR78XYpDgyLHex1xRKjRC+dXeHelsyF9fC5DqWW6K2p++gqcab8sIRi09om9TzlRx0IZ5vpuHBHhQDtP1NOAyUApcV68AfAAgotUYUCKecvNhUhZSm1uwAjUNXzQHKbvjrw6F0pXjKBi3j5J+nf3sb8+7Y7X7R6TvY=; Received: from www by qat.redports.org with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1XOVld-0009ei-Jl; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 17:51:49 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: "Ports-QAT" X-Trac-Version: 1.0.1 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 1.0.1, by Edgewall Software To: pi@FreeBSD.org X-Trac-Project: redports Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 17:51:49 -0000 Reply-To: qat@redports.org X-URL: https://qat.redports.org/ Subject: [QAT] 366738: 4x leftovers To: pi@FreeBSD.org X-Trac-Build-URL: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/20140831093001-56262 X-Trac-Build-ID: 20140831093001-56262 Message-Id: Sender: World Wide Web Owner Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, decke@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 17:51:51 -0000 databases/cego: 2.20.11 -> 2.20.12 - Recovery added for check constraints and foreign keys - Corrections for btree recovery, btree creation was not performed correctly during tableset recovery. Tableset autocorrect mode is enabled on default now ( by define tableset ) Submitted by: Björn Lemke --------------------------------------------------------------------- Build ID: 20140831093001-56262 Job owner: pi@FreeBSD.org Buildtime: 32 hours Enddate: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 17:51:46 GMT Revision: 366738 Repository: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=366738 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Port: databases/cego 2.20.12 Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~pi@FreeBSD.org/20140831093001-56262-406754/cego-2.20.12.log Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~pi@FreeBSD.org/20140831093001-56262-406755/cego-2.20.12.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~pi@FreeBSD.org/20140831093001-56262-406756/cego-2.20.12.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~pi@FreeBSD.org/20140831093001-56262-406757/cego-2.20.12.log -- Buildarchive URL: redports From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 18:56:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1351C15D for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 18:56:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (gw.catspoiler.org [75.1.14.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E985212ED for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 18:56:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id s81It82b083743 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 11:55:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201409011855.s81It82b083743@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 11:55:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis Subject: strange failure when reinstalling multimedia/2mandvd with portupgrade To: ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 18:56:37 -0000 I've been having a problem reinstalling multimedia/2mandvd with portupgrade for a while now. The build succeeds, but I get an odd error when portupgrade tries to uninstall the old version before it installs the new version. ====> Compressing man pages (compress-man) ---> Backing up the old version ---> Uninstalling the old version [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 1383 packages found - done] ---> Deinstalling '2ManDVD-1.8.5' [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 1383 packages found - done] ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) ! 2ManDVD-1.8.5 (invalid byte sequence in US-ASCII) ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) ! multimedia/2mandvd (2ManDVD-1.8.5) (uninstall error) I don't see any issues if I do a manual deinstallation using "pkg delete", and then reinstalling the port works fine. # pkg delete 2ManDVD-1.8.5 Updating database digests format: 100% Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) Deinstallation has been requested for the following 1 packages (of 0 packages in the universe): Installed packages to be REMOVED: 2ManDVD-1.8.5 The operation will free 31 MB. Proceed with deinstalling packages? [y/N]: y [1/1] Deleting 2ManDVD-1.8.5: 100% I don't know where the "invalid byte sequence in US-ASCII" error is coming from. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 19:55:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A1B7FE7; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 19:55:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x22f.google.com (mail-we0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 764771A60; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 19:55:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id k48so5902838wev.34 for ; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 12:55:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:user-agent; bh=pzxq8ur5+6RNzoGg93/FfFfjo1oqOszqau+mRCk/qzM=; b=hZXRFkyyUwP6VXPS8NZ/7IRSnPHZvuSlY1/kayIunWbYAeByRXo2iopGjHM3UnD0Mh Mmcs7ujEQft/jsHj29zyiY1x4UI3wc7Pv0yFaJBWD/dLOfR9D5pIg4moHKnQUMCeEHV6 QZ1vrOy20N72HOc6TrsM59+i2ctVunj4R4bMjECIc3LEZRtmqP18+Vz6ZpQV5gZUH9rp npqjV7nYx52EjzTKjQNXaNvVwmdcQyW7gl5fli7ZjmrMSP/OXtez6p3Om+N+XhGHgbAu JiMpczVbMgMweKLqUGzDLAq4KhN7x64ioHaePVWzsI/mIw2wGfZgbAVeb30iCTP+W6kS W7/A== X-Received: by 10.194.108.41 with SMTP id hh9mr34076770wjb.68.1409601323728; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 12:55:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r8sm4289106wjy.20.2014.09.01.12.55.22 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 01 Sep 2014 12:55:22 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:55:20 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: ports@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org, pkg@FreeBSD.org Subject: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool Message-ID: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 19:55:26 -0000 --xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, The ports tree has been modified to only support pkg(8) as package manageme= nt system for all supported version of FreeBSD. if you were still using pkg_install (pkg_* tools) you will have to upgrade = your system. The simplest way is cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg make install then run=20 pkg2ng You will have lots of warning, don't be scared, they are expected, pkg_* databases used to get easily mangled. pkg2ng is most of the time able to de= al with it. If however you encounter a problem then please report to pkg@FreeBSD.org A tag has been applied to the ports tree if you need to get the latest ports tree before the EOL of pkg_install: https://svn.FreeBSD.org/ports/tags/PKG_INSTALL_EOL A branch has been created if some committers want to provides updates on the for pkg_install users: https://svn.FreeBSD.org/ports/branches/pkg_install Please note that this branch is not officially maintained and that we stron= gly recommend that you do migrate to pkg(8) Best regards, Bapt on behalf of portmgr --xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlQEzygACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ez62ACeKBwgmchm6kJ2rVnYukF+PVH4 0WgAnRVv9QdxS/27NEU+WJBpNg96Zf6u =gM2v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 20:02:57 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C79BCA37 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 20:02:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from avasout08.plus.net (avasout08.plus.net [212.159.14.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B76F1B7D for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 20:02:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk ([84.92.153.232]) by avasout08 with smtp id lw2n1o008516WCc01w2oYg; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 21:02:48 +0100 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=fsVSZTIf c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:117 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:17 a=D7rCoLxHAAAA:8 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=OOzCJWdBeL0A:10 a=fHqs3S773SkA:10 a=6OaeqebLtf8A:10 a=ZTb9aqGL9YkA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=IApu_r9x6Wna8137I1IA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=gWmOFBW1Y4AA:10 Received: from curlew.lan ([192.168.1.13]) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.83) (envelope-from ) id 1XOXoN-0000l8-ES for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 21:02:47 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 21:02:46 +0100 Message-ID: <5851050.ulRMFdZdjx@curlew.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.12.5 (FreeBSD/9.3-RELEASE; KDE/4.12.5; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <88123569.qqSdcqMhXO@curlew.lan> References: <88123569.qqSdcqMhXO@curlew.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.1.13 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on curlew.lan X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Subject: Re: Cant get gimp to use xsane with FreeBSD 10.-RELRASE Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 20:02:57 -0000 On Monday 18 August 2014 21:10:46 I wrote: > The output from gimp --verbose shows the following problem: > > Parsing '/home/mike/.gimp-2.8/pluginrc' > Querying plug-in: '/home/mike/.gimp-2.8/plug-ins/xsane' > /home/mike/.gimp-2.8/plug-ins/xsane: GIMP support missing > Terminating plug-in: '/home/mike/.gimp-2.8/plug-ins/xsane' > Writing '/home/mike/.gimp-2.8/pluginrc' After doing a bit more digging around I've tracked it down to a problem with xsane-0.999_2 when installed with "pkg install" Running gimp-app-2.8.10_5,1 and xsane-0.999_2 installed from packages on 9,3-RELEASE I get the error message Parsing '/home/mike/.gimp-2.8/pluginrc' Querying plug-in: '/home/mike/.gimp-2.8/plug-ins/xsane' /home/mike/.gimp-2.8/plug-ins/xsane: GIMP support missing Terminating plug-in: '/home/mike/.gimp-2.8/plug-ins/xsane' But after deleting xsane and building the same version (0.999_2) from ports with exactly the same options (+DOCS +GIMP +NLS) gimp runs just fine and shows the xsane line in the File - Create menu. Could it be that the copy of xsane-0.999_2 at pkg.FreeBSD.org/freebsd:9:x86:64/latest has been corrupted? -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 20:24:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 819AB397 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 20:24:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x230.google.com (mail-wg0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15D5B1D71 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 20:24:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id n12so5904625wgh.7 for ; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 13:24:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=wyq2JpDLFMCShsJ5PkkGEwClHYt0WGO9p2gs1G4l574=; b=yfFAklPB39KqKLro8Rr6qLvBOKCuih6hq569C5JPBqv/XtKjqW8Vff+KykVpCrhb3c D/CU8P+QscJRvDIN9vM6qPgLDAKCDekBU9G6T/9fhXLXqeNWb4uq8L7wSib9bpbFKhAV 3rA96y1LjDL5FqEH8t7Z3Ln510bShnVTrnl3pSEBMxcSsUXJe3lVYnVNxLFOrQhbYEJd o7NIw6hv3KDgFW6SiY+68YG2L3rUJXm6V9/N5dXmnVeqRN40jyCMiqCU/SYbU+tXcAga aUM87qyuXMac5IsR2HRtwm0EbON8R/+LnQ7AFiGXZ2yTAtv4vBYsdHVWdkaQXnkr5j/2 g+oQ== X-Received: by 10.194.86.34 with SMTP id m2mr34810267wjz.23.1409603077319; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 13:24:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hy9sm4417682wjb.27.2014.09.01.13.24.36 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 01 Sep 2014 13:24:36 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:24:34 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Michael Gmelin Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] The ports tree is now stage only Message-ID: <20140901202434.GF77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20140901092700.GB92321@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140901194134.0391890f@bsd64.grem.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7mxbaLlpDEyR1+x6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140901194134.0391890f@bsd64.grem.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 20:24:39 -0000 --7mxbaLlpDEyR1+x6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 07:41:34PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote: > On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 11:27:00 +0200 > Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >=20 > > Hi all, > >=20 > > The ports tree is now fully staged (only 2% has been left unstaged, > > marked as broken and will be removed from the ports tree if no PR to > > stage them are pending in bugzilla). > >=20 > > I would like to thank every committer and maintainers for their work > > on staging! It allowed us to convert more than 23k packages to > > support stage in only 11 months! > >=20 > > Staging is a very important state, it allows us to right now be able > > to run quality testing scripts on the packages (which already allowed > > to fix tons of hidden problems) and it allows use to be able to build > > packages as a regular user! > >=20 > > It also opens the gates to new features that users have been > > requesting for many years: > > - flavors > > - multiple packages > >=20 > > Expect those features to happen in the near future. > >=20 > > Best regards, > > Bapt on behalf of portmgr > >=20 >=20 > Impressive effort and totally worth it. >=20 > Could you maybe publish the list of all ports that didn't make it > on the wiki (e.g. at https://wiki.freebsd.org/ports/StageDir)? >=20 > --=20 > Michael Gmelin I added the list to the wiki page I try to maintain it up to date https://people.FreeBSD.org/~bapt/notstaged.txt regards, Bapt --7mxbaLlpDEyR1+x6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlQE1gIACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyvuACguN4Aw5B6hCuHyAunWub9mGNm GPAAoJzicIQ3Z8Pun+ts6Ff5WoDwaTTv =a1g+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7mxbaLlpDEyR1+x6-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 20:30:59 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B480D480 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 20:30:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.lunabase.org (mail.lunabase.org [173.255.212.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C58E1DA7 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 20:30:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from praxis.lunabase.org (cpe-172-249-196-215.socal.res.rr.com [172.249.196.215]) by mail.lunabase.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 72A0342298; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 13:30:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5404D76F.10205@lunabase.org> Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 13:30:39 -0700 From: Ted Faber User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kurt Jaeger Subject: Re: How to submit a port update? References: <5401F646.6030304@lunabase.org> <20140830175001.GS9400@home.opsec.eu> <54023CF9.1040002@lunabase.org> <20140830212321.GV9400@home.opsec.eu> <540250CF.5010803@lunabase.org> <20140831075059.GW9400@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <20140831075059.GW9400@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pvxaVo3K4aQKKOpiciscivi9ORbWalfaA" Cc: faber@lunabase.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 20:30:59 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --pvxaVo3K4aQKKOpiciscivi9ORbWalfaA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 08/31/2014 12:50 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! >=20 >> The update is mostly some small changes to the code to eliminate clang= ++ >> and recent g++ warnings along with Eric's typo, which has been >> languishing for a while. I know it's a small thing, but seeing those= >> warnings when I compile the port makes me sad. Obviously you guys can= >> reject if you don't feel it's worth it. >=20 > Well, it's always nice to check process and procedures while it's > not time-critical 8-} >=20 > And you are right, the porters handbook still mentions send-pr. >=20 > There is one thing which is very nice to have for an incoming PR: > poudriere test logs that prove that the updated port builds cleanly. >=20 > If you never used poudriere, have a look at this short starter guide: >=20 > https://fossil.etoilebsd.net/poudriere/doc/trunk/doc/using_testport.wik= i >=20 >> That changes the port diff, of course. The new one is attached, or I >> can update bugzilla. >=20 > Always update bugzilla (says the guy who preferres mail...) >=20 >> Sorry to bug you if it's too trivial a change. >=20 > No, it's fine. I guess I would only release new versions if runtime bug= s > or runtime functionality changes. You also updated the autotools > environment, maybe that fixes other stuff as well. >=20 > You re-rolled the distfile without a version change, this is not > purrrfect, but well, what else is 8-) >=20 Thanks for all your help. I see that the update went through. Next time I'll include the pourdriere logs. Thanks! --=20 http://www.lunabase.org/~faber Unexpected attachment? http://www.lunabase.org/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG --pvxaVo3K4aQKKOpiciscivi9ORbWalfaA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlQE128ACgkQaUz3f+Zf+XusawCdGOY1qTVIX104lXP/PgMzCABM WqgAmwXNWxQiFiXi1f9eV2O2iznxM2jv =zfeg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pvxaVo3K4aQKKOpiciscivi9ORbWalfaA-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 20:46:19 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60E8A915; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 20:46:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB251F3B; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 20:46:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from u10-2-16-021.office.norse-data.com (unknown [50.204.88.51]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C92E4346DE1D; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 13:46:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5404DB93.3050200@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 13:48:19 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin , ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] The ports tree is now stage only References: <20140901092700.GB92321@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20140901092700.GB92321@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 20:46:19 -0000 On 9/1/14 2:27 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Hi all, > > The ports tree is now fully staged (only 2% has been left unstaged, marked as > broken and will be removed from the ports tree if no PR to stage them are > pending in bugzilla). > > I would like to thank every committer and maintainers for their work on staging! > It allowed us to convert more than 23k packages to support stage in only 11 > months! > > Staging is a very important state, it allows us to right now be able to run > quality testing scripts on the packages (which already allowed to fix tons of > hidden problems) This is all so cool, but so very excited about this: > and it allows use to be able to build packages as a regular > user! yes yes yes!! Huge step forward to freebsd adoption! > > It also opens the gates to new features that users have been requesting for many > years: > - flavors > - multiple packages > > Expect those features to happen in the near future. > > Best regards, > Bapt on behalf of portmgr > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 21:15:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55CAD131; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "neonpark.inter-sonic.com", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AB8112B6; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:15:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at BSDLabs AB Message-ID: <5404E1D2.1020201@intersonic.se> Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 23:14:58 +0200 From: Per olof Ljungmark Organization: Intersonic AB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: www/horde does not run on 10-STABLE - Fatal Error: Could not pack data Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 21:15:12 -0000 Sorry for the cross-post but this is a bit out of the ordinary for me. In short, no matter how I try varoius changes, I am unable to run www/horde-base under latest 10-STABLE. The error is: HORDE: Could not pack data. [pid 80949 on line 154 of "/usr/local/share/pear/Horde/Pack.php"] >From what I gather, Pack.php deals with compressing data before cache, maybe also before sending to browser. Problem occurs both through Apache and with php cli. Facts: The same config ran on 10-STABLE mid-August Stopped working after updating to latest 10-STABLE end last week (27th.) Same config runs fine on 9-STABLE. Today I did a fresh 9-STABLE, got Horde up and running fine. Updated the system to 10-STABLE. rebuilt all ports and the error is back. Please, if anyone has ANY idea what is going on? If I was fluent in PHP I assume I could figure out myself... Thank you! //per From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 21:44:29 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3562DD5D; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.multiplay.co.uk (smtp1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDBD51737; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp1.multiplay.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 65534) id C27E320E70892; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:44:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.multiplay.co.uk X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=8.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DOS_OE_TO_MX, FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1,RDNS_DYNAMIC,STOX_REPLY_TYPE autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from r2d2 (82-69-141-170.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.141.170]) by smtp1.multiplay.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9751020E7088F; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:44:06 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <88395BA14462465DB1E28AF4A946EC42@multiplay.co.uk> From: "Steven Hartland" To: "Per olof Ljungmark" , References: <5404E1D2.1020201@intersonic.se> Subject: Re: www/horde does not run on 10-STABLE - Fatal Error: Could not pack data Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:44:06 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 21:44:29 -0000 Have you made sure you have rebuilt all php libs? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Per olof Ljungmark" To: Cc: Sent: Monday, September 01, 2014 10:14 PM Subject: www/horde does not run on 10-STABLE - Fatal Error: Could not pack data > Sorry for the cross-post but this is a bit out of the ordinary for me. > > In short, no matter how I try varoius changes, I am unable to run > www/horde-base under latest 10-STABLE. The error is: > > HORDE: Could not pack data. [pid 80949 on line 154 of > "/usr/local/share/pear/Horde/Pack.php"] > > From what I gather, Pack.php deals with compressing data before cache, > maybe also before sending to browser. Problem occurs both through > Apache > and with php cli. > > Facts: > The same config ran on 10-STABLE mid-August > Stopped working after updating to latest 10-STABLE end last week > (27th.) > Same config runs fine on 9-STABLE. Today I did a fresh 9-STABLE, got > Horde up and running fine. Updated the system to 10-STABLE. rebuilt > all > ports and the error is back. > > Please, if anyone has ANY idea what is going on? If I was fluent in > PHP > I assume I could figure out myself... > > Thank you! > > //per > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 21:51:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92A4DFC4; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:51:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "neonpark.inter-sonic.com", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 538DB181C; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:51:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at BSDLabs AB Message-ID: <5404EA59.2060004@intersonic.se> Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 23:51:21 +0200 From: Per olof Ljungmark Organization: Intersonic AB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Hartland , ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: www/horde does not run on 10-STABLE - Fatal Error: Could not pack data References: <5404E1D2.1020201@intersonic.se> <88395BA14462465DB1E28AF4A946EC42@multiplay.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <88395BA14462465DB1E28AF4A946EC42@multiplay.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 21:51:26 -0000 On 09/01/14 23:44, Steven Hartland wrote: > Have you made sure you have rebuilt all php libs? Yes, twice, portmaster -fa Also, a fresh install of 10-STABLE yielded same result as upgrading 9. > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Per olof Ljungmark" > To: > Cc: > Sent: Monday, September 01, 2014 10:14 PM > Subject: www/horde does not run on 10-STABLE - Fatal Error: Could not > pack data > > >> Sorry for the cross-post but this is a bit out of the ordinary for me. >> >> In short, no matter how I try varoius changes, I am unable to run >> www/horde-base under latest 10-STABLE. The error is: >> >> HORDE: Could not pack data. [pid 80949 on line 154 of >> "/usr/local/share/pear/Horde/Pack.php"] >> >> From what I gather, Pack.php deals with compressing data before cache, >> maybe also before sending to browser. Problem occurs both through Apache >> and with php cli. >> >> Facts: >> The same config ran on 10-STABLE mid-August >> Stopped working after updating to latest 10-STABLE end last week (27th.) >> Same config runs fine on 9-STABLE. Today I did a fresh 9-STABLE, got >> Horde up and running fine. Updated the system to 10-STABLE. rebuilt all >> ports and the error is back. >> >> Please, if anyone has ANY idea what is going on? If I was fluent in PHP >> I assume I could figure out myself... >> >> Thank you! >> >> //per >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Intersonic AB Registered in Solna, Sweden SE556539368201 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 00:17:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41E19B2B for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 00:17:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from quine.pinyon.org (quine.pinyon.org [65.101.5.249]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D1641558 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 00:17:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by quine.pinyon.org (Postfix, from userid 122) id EF9F41603D0; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 17:17:09 -0700 (MST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on quine.pinyon.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from feyerabend.n1.pinyon.org (feyerabend.n1.pinyon.org [10.0.10.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by quine.pinyon.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8420160371 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 17:17:06 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <54050C82.7090607@pinyon.org> Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 17:17:06 -0700 From: "Russell L. Carter" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: poudriere and DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 00:17:17 -0000 Greetings, root@terpsichore> cat /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf # DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=YES root@terpsichore> Running poudriere I see that it does indeed concatenate that make.conf into its configuration. But all those rotten, terrible, awful buggy ancient security-nightmare linux-f10 ports still fail. What should I do instead? Thanks, Russell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 00:19:30 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 185CBC0B; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 00:19:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (hades.sorbs.net [67.231.146.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72ACF1578; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 00:19:29 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0NB80004QZQPH900@hades.sorbs.net>; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 17:23:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-id: <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 02:19:19 +0200 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-reply-to: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, pkg@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 00:19:30 -0000 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Hi all, > > The ports tree has been modified to only support pkg(8) as package management > system for all supported version of FreeBSD. > > if you were still using pkg_install (pkg_* tools) you will have to upgrade your > system. > > The simplest way is > cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg > make install > then run > pkg2ng > > You will have lots of warning, don't be scared, they are expected, pkg_* > databases used to get easily mangled. pkg2ng is most of the time able to deal > with it. > > If however you encounter a problem then please report to pkg@FreeBSD.org > > A tag has been applied to the ports tree if you need to get the latest ports > tree before the EOL of pkg_install: > https://svn.FreeBSD.org/ports/tags/PKG_INSTALL_EOL > > A branch has been created if some committers want to provides updates on the > for pkg_install users: > https://svn.FreeBSD.org/ports/branches/pkg_install > > Please note that this branch is not officially maintained and that we strongly > recommend that you do migrate to pkg(8) > > Best regards, > Bapt on behalf of portmgr > And for the portsnap users? -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 00:27:16 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EF66E8A for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 00:27:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a27-38.smtp-out.us-west-2.amazonses.com (a27-38.smtp-out.us-west-2.amazonses.com [54.240.27.38]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26C041786 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 00:27:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=hsbnp7p3ensaochzwyq5wwmceodymuwv; d=amazonses.com; t=1409617627; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:Feedback-ID; bh=uCQQyso/ET712pmc8s5zc1R3m0INxtI14//OpXx/PjA=; b=V0QSDQ49+4/YycdYE4jPTcMM0IYVIlJAsXpLQUQbKpf7AdS4unNlo2gKPbRyN1aU z4+ry4IOXM690bsEvD9+RcoGBHHKOzntrI8HI5DsyhYUenhtcBRaDW/pVX2wxnSy4GT sO/iiiNYKe5RlGqhDOlyoUCpQ8VYEtQ2we03prbM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=7iuvfuckmdjngkit3px46zmjutqvp75o; d=vmeta.jp; t=1409617627; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:In-Reply-To; bh=uCQQyso/ET712pmc8s5zc1R3m0INxtI14//OpXx/PjA=; b=TbR6C5LHArevC69I3PGuxZHQ98id2zgUZ59we0HOor1AESZfEMBT7fFRUg+Qz6rL 22tMYfT8/iPz5iDPLeTOvbd7GODXKPAyrK5+4RWubWrW4c5boK9+jpivX5WHwuSEp0k JmWc1t3nyELvgXoNO31Qzw4qXzpsyTfG8S9tlP10= Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 00:27:07 +0000 From: meta To: Bryan Drewery Subject: Re: pkg-fallout USE_PACKAGE_DEPENDS_ONLY and SIGERR? Message-ID: <0000014833c20a18-9eb4c74b-0b47-4763-870f-9dc93dbffb62-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> References: <000001482096f9ef-dacf0525-2100-4a1d-a666-39af5177e083-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> <5400A6F0.60807@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5400A6F0.60807@FreeBSD.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE-p7 amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SES-Outgoing: 2014.09.02-54.240.27.38 Feedback-ID: us-west-2.bWV0YUB2bWV0YS5qcA==:AmazonSES Cc: ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 00:27:16 -0000 Bryan, Thank you very much, I try to fix it. On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:14:40AM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 8/29/2014 2:07 AM, Koichiro IWAO wrote: > > Hello, > > > > How can I fix following two pkg-fallout notifications? The one of them > > is about > > dependency, another one is SIGERR. I have no idea how to fix it. > > Please help. > > > >> ===> USE_PACKAGE_DEPENDS_ONLY set - not building missing dependency > >> from source > >> *** Error code 1 > >> > >> Stop. > >> make: stopped in /usr/ports/japanese/font-ricty > > > >> ==> Building for ja-font-ricty-discord-3.2.3 > >> cd > >> /wrkdirs/usr/ports/japanese/font-ricty-discord/work/yascentur-Ricty-0fd7047 > >> && > >> /bin/sh > >> /wrkdirs/usr/ports/japanese/font-ricty-discord/work/yascentur-Ricty-0fd7047/ricty_generator.sh > >> > >> /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/OTF/Inconsolata.otf > >> /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/migu-1m-regular.ttf > >> /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/migu-1m-bold.ttf > >> Ricty Generator 3.2.3b > >> > >> Author: Yasunori Yusa > >> > >> This script is to generate ``Ricty'' font from Inconsolata and Migu 1M. > >> It requires 2-5 minutes to generate Ricty. Owing to SIL Open Font License > >> Version 1.1 section 5, it is PROHIBITED to distribute the generated font. > >> > >> trap: bad signal ERR > >> *** Error code 2 > >> > > For ricty-discord: > > The ricty_generator.sh script is using a bashism and expects to use bash > as noted in at the top of the script. > > font-ricty/Makefile is running with /bin/sh though: > 56 do-build: > 57 cd ${WRKSRC} &&\ > 58 ${SH} ${WRKSRC}/ricty_generator.sh \ > > You'll need a BUILD_DEPENDS on bash and use ${LOCALBASE}/bin/bash rather > than ${SH} there. > > Or patch out whatever the trap is doing in the script. > > I'm not sure how japanese/font-ricty has ever worked. > > For font-ricty: > > It is likely a false positive failure in a way. Because > font-ricty-discord did not build it cannot build font-ricty either. It > should have *skipped* trying, but it managed to try and found that its > dependency was not built. Fix font-ricty-discord and it should fix > font-ricty. > > >> Stop in /usr/ports/japanese/font-ricty-discord. > >> *** Error code 1 > > > > http://beefy2.isc.freebsd.org/data/10amd64-quarterly/2014-08-27_15h21m01s/logs/ja-font-ricty-3.2.3.log > > > > http://beefy1.isc.freebsd.org/data/84i386-default/2014-08-15_14h18m35s/logs/ja-font-ricty-discord-3.2.3.log > > > > > > > -- > Regards, > Bryan Drewery > -- `whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w` meta From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 01:02:56 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1A91385 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 01:02:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from quine.pinyon.org (quine.pinyon.org [65.101.5.249]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CCC71A8D for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 01:02:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by quine.pinyon.org (Postfix, from userid 122) id B612316022E; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 18:02:55 -0700 (MST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on quine.pinyon.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from feyerabend.n1.pinyon.org (feyerabend.n1.pinyon.org [10.0.10.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by quine.pinyon.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7EB831600F1 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 18:02:53 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <5405173D.20902@pinyon.org> Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 18:02:53 -0700 From: "Russell L. Carter" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: chromium iconify->resurrect Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 01:02:56 -0000 Greetings, I am curious if this is a problem that anyone else is seeing. chromium 37.0.2062.94, current r269700M Start up chromium, then immediately iconify it. Then try bringing it back again. All I get (after a delay of several seconds) is a white canvas in the correct size. Chromium does respond to window manager commands (fvwm close, no destroy needed, in my case). Thanks, Russell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 01:29:18 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E9B7719 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 01:29:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-x22d.google.com (mail-qa0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E2DA1C68 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 01:29:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id f12so5546534qad.4 for ; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 18:29:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=3oRteJtoSh8JB8MX/7gCf+PFTuLFsxUuhgvRZoLjRa0=; b=UDHyxVqDchSWoQrc/Rh3blVQ3ju3xSnf+6eg/CYmgYG2YkyXlaFnxruOH9y5SPwu8l uyF0gwhdJQg+J3lqy0RD1yNo6RYA7JIQLnle1tcJNX+Mw+aVE36pEGVM7vRpQ9VeHaf5 0Wy1rQatJ+d0X9LChZ4BE6TA1YJMGHaz2dFgrMZUNPFC5YJ9Iuvf1xvHVdHXfbUFWW0x 9PlY2WfndJJhjmwQ7QsTk1969jnatewUZaUasU64GRfnDxvhHEDlEpmReJEHBipfZUxv RYK922XBtfLfZXuRdcFUO7sfw24wA/dlTnrmKP7+t6JuV3yGiiLaqBTFcio1u84nEJkE 5+RQ== X-Received: by 10.224.151.69 with SMTP id b5mr51350317qaw.37.1409621357004; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 18:29:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from keyhole.local (173-26-254-198.client.mchsi.com. [173.26.254.198]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b109sm3141625qgf.28.2014.09.01.18.29.16 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 01 Sep 2014 18:29:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Chuck Burns To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: poudriere and DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 20:29:13 -0500 Message-ID: <2SVjstvmvj2CplagwG782091WBmD4BZm@keyhole.local> User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (OpenBSD/5.6; KDE/4.13.3; i386; ; ) In-Reply-To: <54050C82.7090607@pinyon.org> References: <54050C82.7090607@pinyon.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 01:29:18 -0000 On Monday, September 01, 2014 5:17:06 PM Russell L. Carter wrote: > Greetings, > > root@terpsichore> cat /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf > # > DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=YES > root@terpsichore> > > Running poudriere I see that it does indeed concatenate > that make.conf into its configuration. But all those rotten, > terrible, awful buggy ancient security-nightmare linux-f10 > ports still fail. What should I do instead? > > Thanks, > Russell > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Wait for the f20 ports? They're being worked on, according to some other mailing lists that I'm on.. -- Chuck Burns Audemus Jura Nostra Defendere From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 01:37:45 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47B23AF3 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 01:37:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from quine.pinyon.org (quine.pinyon.org [65.101.5.249]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E0FA1D47 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 01:37:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by quine.pinyon.org (Postfix, from userid 122) id D771E160230; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 18:37:43 -0700 (MST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on quine.pinyon.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from feyerabend.n1.pinyon.org (feyerabend.n1.pinyon.org [10.0.10.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by quine.pinyon.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B6C9160228 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 18:37:41 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <54051F65.1000701@pinyon.org> Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 18:37:41 -0700 From: "Russell L. Carter" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: poudriere and DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES References: <54050C82.7090607@pinyon.org> <2SVjstvmvj2CplagwG782091WBmD4BZm@keyhole.local> In-Reply-To: <2SVjstvmvj2CplagwG782091WBmD4BZm@keyhole.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 01:37:45 -0000 On 09/01/14 18:29, Chuck Burns wrote: > On Monday, September 01, 2014 5:17:06 PM Russell L. Carter wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> root@terpsichore> cat /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf >> # >> DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=YES >> root@terpsichore> >> >> Running poudriere I see that it does indeed concatenate >> that make.conf into its configuration. But all those rotten, >> terrible, awful buggy ancient security-nightmare linux-f10 >> ports still fail. What should I do instead? >> >> Thanks, >> Russell >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Wait for the f20 ports? They're being worked on, according to some other > mailing lists that I'm on.. > Ok, that's fine. And maybe that linux-f20 port is great news. (What "mailing lists" would those be, that one gets that news?) However, what I would like to learn is if poudriere is able to understand DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=YES, and if so, how to enable it. I'm not asking a political question here, just a technical one. If this is possible, how do I do it? Thanks, Russell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 01:39:36 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D717AB90; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 01:39:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-x236.google.com (mail-vc0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E6EB1D54; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 01:39:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id im17so6207736vcb.41 for ; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 18:39:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=EDddnFDjbRLMlBYKZ/aqRFPoXdlZ0Is/Bi+YFecmJrQ=; b=oPIjIJJivjOZoJX1rqrbU35IGTi/7YexPeaIMgG/e1j3DwGxHf5ibm6CxxTnDdNFTh 6VVtAkdg2ck1ICokQEUcNdMbiUicnVlUp4szo1xdJeH3AbtYK6XUbG3D7yCdD2s5E15i 4vRgvRIHMO4OZ6zqivG3LLJ/hTbw84DZk/MMtsWyp+IsxdgRSS1yavNUxTBG5Fs9iNqp XgR9SUAz15E57ZnSs20icMZX5HfKnns7hFiFNyaIca67Ehj1CzT4gWf9YQ+LDseav4TZ BcIeh92V8ZGK2QRmcOIceR3pLqtGCsRQbnh4SMHKv8LM6RG0nSTr5DkWzHEdLwKP/CAS v68A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.163.69 with SMTP id z5mr27867954vcx.10.1409621974373; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 18:39:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.221.57.72 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 18:39:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 20:39:34 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool From: "Sam Fourman Jr." To: Michelle Sullivan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, pkg@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin , stable@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Current X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 01:39:36 -0000 > > And for the portsnap users? > > In short, this change doesn't directly effect portsnap users. Portsnap is a tool that used to obtain a copy of the ports tree. Portsnap is only one way, another way to get a copy of the ports tree is by using subversion and checking it out by using the svn command. pkg(8) is a package management tool, and to make use of most packages having a copy of the ports tree is not required. > > > -- > Michelle Sullivan > http://www.mhix.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Sam Fourman Jr. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 01:51:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08FEAFC5; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 01:51:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (hades.sorbs.net [67.231.146.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB2FE1E3F; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 01:51:34 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0NB90005G40CH900@hades.sorbs.net>; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 18:55:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-id: <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 03:51:31 +0200 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: "Sam Fourman Jr." Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> In-reply-to: Cc: ports@freebsd.org, pkg@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin , stable@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Current X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 01:51:35 -0000 Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: >> And for the portsnap users? >> >> >> > In short, this change doesn't directly effect portsnap users. > Sure about that? > Portsnap is a tool that used to obtain a copy of the ports tree. > try this: portsnap fetch update && cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg && make install If you *haven't* install pkg first... > Portsnap is only one way, another way to get a copy of the ports tree is by > using subversion and checking it out by using the svn command. > Not much good if you haven't installed svn already... > pkg(8) is a package management tool, and to make use of most packages > having a copy of the ports tree is not required. > > Correct, take a 9.2 install disk, install it, portsnap and then install pkg on it... Oh wait, you can't.. pkg_install is broken, and 9.2 install disks don't have pkg in the BaseOS.... -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 01:56:43 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84680232 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 01:56:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-x235.google.com (mail-qc0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FC391EE7 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 01:56:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id i17so6092296qcy.26 for ; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 18:56:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=yYl8sznRekJ8D+cMznL4BbWBbfyHCRAIKyFbYsGYBG8=; b=VibVdoMyJjKb/CihXMIbceet9VpNQ2zG3Ra1zKmMQLwFtzco4KnkSNcbJzShh2jx+3 KUmNxYaGbTaFedTs4+pINVCoxe4eMnLQpu94V4y5v2l4QpZXgdk/tu4QMDx7cHgFuO/h bjsH6rr7TqVgp4zXiBjIoj9ICybBMIieR+9hOdCjvfwGY1fYwsvzgnn3E9+zzinn3j03 YejsjXMzA8RkelN6JDg8xKn4UlkLxBDf0I/M130PE2WZcwn1JygeJ0C+9+m9Zx5KgGUn rmZxlF1ucPNPJ66Zjamh3twNA0++ekmkDdqRepiT/br6O054hpm46qUOYLyege8BkVgd EWAg== X-Received: by 10.224.134.202 with SMTP id k10mr51970734qat.19.1409623002423; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 18:56:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from keyhole.local (173-26-254-198.client.mchsi.com. [173.26.254.198]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id p5sm6436031qah.3.2014.09.01.18.56.41 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 01 Sep 2014 18:56:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Chuck Burns To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 20:56:39 -0500 Message-ID: User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (OpenBSD/5.6; KDE/4.13.3; i386; ; ) In-Reply-To: <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 01:56:43 -0000 On Tuesday, September 02, 2014 3:51:31 AM Michelle Sullivan wrote: > Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: > >> And for the portsnap users? > > > > In short, this change doesn't directly effect portsnap users. > > Sure about that? > > > Portsnap is a tool that used to obtain a copy of the ports tree. > > try this: > > portsnap fetch update && cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg && make install > > If you *haven't* install pkg first... > > > Portsnap is only one way, another way to get a copy of the ports tree is > > by > > using subversion and checking it out by using the svn command. > > Not much good if you haven't installed svn already... > > > pkg(8) is a package management tool, and to make use of most packages > > having a copy of the ports tree is not required. > > Correct, take a 9.2 install disk, install it, portsnap and then install > pkg on it... Oh wait, you can't.. pkg_install is broken, and 9.2 > install disks don't have pkg in the BaseOS.... Why and how would someone delete a file off a running 9.2 system? New releases already use pkg. The first time you attempt to use pkg on a pkg-enabled release, it prompts you to download ports-mgmt/pkg and manually installs it. It's called "bootstrapping" This is not an issue here. Try it for yourself. -- Chuck Burns Audemus Jura Nostra Defendere From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 02:17:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D6E5576; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 02:17:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1lp0145.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89293111B; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 02:17:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2601:2:4780:2fd:3cfa:1b41:db29:34df] (2601:2:4780:2fd:3cfa:1b41:db29:34df) by CY1PR0301MB0843.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.163.149) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1019.16; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 02:16:55 +0000 Message-ID: <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:16:49 -0500 From: Andrew Berg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michelle Sullivan , Sam Fourman Jr. Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> In-Reply-To: <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [2601:2:4780:2fd:3cfa:1b41:db29:34df] X-ClientProxiedBy: BN3PR0301CA0017.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.180.155) To CY1PR0301MB0843.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.163.149) X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;UriScan:; X-Forefront-PRVS: 0322B4EDE1 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(6009001)(189002)(199003)(24454002)(51704005)(74502001)(31966008)(74662001)(77096002)(83322001)(50986999)(42186005)(59896002)(4396001)(85306004)(93886004)(87266999)(99396002)(65816999)(76176999)(99136001)(54356999)(102836001)(46102001)(88552001)(21056001)(83506001)(64706001)(50466002)(101416001)(85852003)(83072002)(90102001)(79102001)(80022001)(117636001)(23676002)(65956001)(86362001)(89122001)(76482001)(64126003)(92726001)(20776003)(47776003)(81542001)(92566001)(81342001)(77982001)(107046002)(75432001)(95666004)(87976001)(105586002)(106356001)(89472002)(3826002); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:CY1PR0301MB0843; H:[IPv6:2601:2:4780:2fd:3cfa:1b41:db29:34df]; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:0; LANG:en; X-OriginatorOrg: my.hennepintech.edu Cc: ports@freebsd.org, pkg@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin , stable@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Current X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 02:17:07 -0000 On 2014.09.01 20:51, Michelle Sullivan wrote: >>> And for the portsnap users? >>> >> In short, this change doesn't directly effect portsnap users. >> > Sure about that? I'm sure of it. Your issue is with the tree itself, not the tool used to fetch it. > Correct, take a 9.2 install disk, install it, portsnap and then install > pkg on it... Oh wait, you can't.. pkg_install is broken, and 9.2 > install disks don't have pkg in the BaseOS.... Use the ports tree tarball included, or fetch it (either during or after installation). It is not impossible to get an old version of the ports tree with only the 9.2 base system. I don't see how this is anything more than an inconvenience. Also, 9.3 is out and the 9.2 EOL is not far away. Not sure why you would be doing a new install with 9.2. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 02:20:56 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDF5E8C7; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 02:20:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 937481174; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 02:20:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from julian-mbp3.pixel8networks.com (50-196-156-133-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.196.156.133]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s822KsDZ018211 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 1 Sep 2014 19:20:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <54052981.7010502@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 19:20:49 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Sam Fourman Jr." , Michelle Sullivan Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, pkg@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin , stable@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Current X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 02:20:57 -0000 On 9/1/14, 6:39 PM, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: >> And for the portsnap users? >> >> > In short, this change doesn't directly effect portsnap users. > > Portsnap is a tool that used to obtain a copy of the ports tree. > > Portsnap is only one way, another way to get a copy of the ports tree is by > using subversion and checking it out by using the svn command. > > pkg(8) is a package management tool, and to make use of most packages > having a copy of the ports tree is not required. But it is if you don't want the options that a pkg is built with. We need to do a lot of pkg munging for that reason, generating our own versions (which is ok, that's not a complaint, just a fact of life). I've warmed to pkg after using it a bit, and many of its initial shortcomings have been fixed. But one thing I'd like to request (a very minor thing).. Could the packing list have some newlines inserted into it to make it more humanly readable? Our old tools for auditing and controlling (old style) packages would print out that information. The new tools we need to write will need to do similar. We did an experiment at work here and wrote a small script that parsed it and then rewrote it back to the package with newlines added and pkg handled it just fine, so it should be a very minor thing to add some newlines when generating it in the first place. I don't think anything else needs to be changed. > >> >> -- >> Michelle Sullivan >> http://www.mhix.org/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 02:27:04 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C7E6BC9; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 02:27:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thyme.infocus-llc.com (thyme.infocus-llc.com [199.15.120.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 758671262; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 02:27:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (c-75-65-60-66.hsd1.ms.comcast.net [75.65.60.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by thyme.infocus-llc.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1CBD237B409; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:26:56 -0500 (CDT) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 3hnBxW1HBHz18B; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:26:55 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:26:55 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Michelle Sullivan Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool Message-ID: <20140902022655.GI43581@over-yonder.net> References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23-fullermd.4 (2014-03-12) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at thyme.infocus-llc.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: pkg@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin , FreeBSD Current , stable@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, "Sam Fourman Jr." X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 02:27:04 -0000 On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 03:51:31AM +0200 I heard the voice of Michelle Sullivan, and lo! it spake thus: > > Correct, take a 9.2 install disk, install it, portsnap and then > install pkg on it... Oh wait, you can't.. pkg_install is broken, > and 9.2 install disks don't have pkg in the BaseOS.... So what? The pkg port uses _ITSELF_ to register. The "pkg" in the base system isn't pkg, it just a bootstrap to fetch the pkg pkg (which them uses itself to register too). If you're using the pkg _PORT_, it's not even involved in the first place. -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 02:27:46 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 564EFE5E; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 02:27:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (hades.sorbs.net [67.231.146.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C57AF127F; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 02:27:45 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0NB90005O5OMH900@hades.sorbs.net>; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 19:31:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-id: <54052B1D.3040607@sorbs.net> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 04:27:41 +0200 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: Andrew Berg Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> In-reply-to: <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> Cc: pkg@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin , FreeBSD Current , stable@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, "Sam Fourman Jr." X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 02:27:46 -0000 Andrew Berg wrote: > On 2014.09.01 20:51, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > >>>> And for the portsnap users? >>>> >>>> >>> In short, this change doesn't directly effect portsnap users. >>> >>> >> Sure about that? >> > I'm sure of it. Your issue is with the tree itself, not the tool used to fetch it. > > >> Correct, take a 9.2 install disk, install it, portsnap and then install >> pkg on it... Oh wait, you can't.. pkg_install is broken, and 9.2 >> install disks don't have pkg in the BaseOS.... >> > Use the ports tree tarball included, or fetch it (either during or after > installation). It is not impossible to get an old version of the ports tree > with only the 9.2 base system. I don't see how this is anything more than an > inconvenience. > Actually it's an inconvenience for someone like me and you. Not for many freebsd users, and certainly not for me 6 months ago if I hadn't been writing my own ports.... oh and what was it, 1.3.6 -> 1.3.7? broke shit... (badly) ... > Also, 9.3 is out and the 9.2 EOL is not far away. Not sure why you would be > doing a new install with 9.2. > Try getting yourself a FreeBSD server at Softlayer... They still install 7.x for Christ's sake (amongst others - but last time I checked, on new servers, 8.4, 9.0, 9.1, 10.0*) * the 10.0 is the original release, completely unpatched. Look I'm not saying the change isn't for the better, I'm saying not supporting older systems until you're sure 99% of the userbase is upgraded is not a bad thing, what I am saying is deliberately breaking all older systems (some without *major pain*) when the new system has just had a major issue, and not everyone had time to upgrade is a *bad thing* ... (not had time - because an EOL message is not a 'It will not work after this date' message it is a 'you're unsupported after this date and things *might* not work as expected' - even Windows XP didn't got his root... they EOL'd XP, then they stated for 2 or was it 3 years, that after 'x' date there would not be any new security patches... but you can still get software for XP, some is even patched... FreeBSD... Sept 1, 2014, you're not on pkg, you're fucked.) -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 02:40:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6F6A2B9 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 02:40:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B232A1364 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 02:40:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from julian-mbp3.pixel8networks.com (50-196-156-133-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.196.156.133]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s822e0Pt018262 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 1 Sep 2014 19:40:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <54052DFA.4030808@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 19:39:54 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Berg , Michelle Sullivan , "Sam Fourman Jr." Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> In-Reply-To: <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, pkg@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin , stable@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Current X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 02:40:07 -0000 On 9/1/14, 7:16 PM, Andrew Berg wrote: > On 2014.09.01 20:51, Michelle Sullivan wrote: >>>> And for the portsnap users? >>>> >>> In short, this change doesn't directly effect portsnap users. >>> >> Sure about that? > I'm sure of it. Your issue is with the tree itself, not the tool used to fetch it. > >> Correct, take a 9.2 install disk, install it, portsnap and then install >> pkg on it... Oh wait, you can't.. pkg_install is broken, and 9.2 >> install disks don't have pkg in the BaseOS.... > Use the ports tree tarball included, or fetch it (either during or after > installation). It is not impossible to get an old version of the ports tree > with only the 9.2 base system. I don't see how this is anything more than an > inconvenience. > Also, 9.3 is out and the 9.2 EOL is not far away. Not sure why you would be > doing a new install with 9.2. sigh.. when are we as a project, all going to learn that reality in business is that you often need to install stuff that is old. Its not always your choice. The custommers require it.. You should try arguing with someone like Bank of Americas security and operations department some day about whether they want to suddenly upgrade 300 machines for no real reason (from their perspective). On that topic, 10.0 is slightly broken from that perspective because as you install it, it upgrades pkg to a new version that was not in 10.0, so you can no longer build a 10.0 machine that matches the 10.0 machines you installed at the custommer site when 10.0 first came out, that they qualified as acceptible.. Well you MAY get the mostly same result, but the 'pkg' you have is a different one so the image checks out as different' (Imaginary hooters sound and theoretical security alerts trigger etc.) (oh and it interacts badly with the installer designed to run with the previous version.. The first part of the install works fine, and then half way through the install, things go strange when pkg upgrades itself.) 10.0 is past but we should think about how to prevent that in 10.1 etc. I guess the pkg config file in the install needs to be locked down to the release until the install is completed. We should make sure the base install only installs the pkg in the release and doesn't upgrade itself without asking first... (luckily that last issue doesn't affect most business customers who use their own install schemes). > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 03:00:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD1AB961; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 03:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (hades.sorbs.net [67.231.146.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1436A15A3; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 03:00:01 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0NB90005Y76DH900@hades.sorbs.net>; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 20:03:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-id: <540532AC.2070508@sorbs.net> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 04:59:56 +0200 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: Julian Elischer Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> <54052DFA.4030808@freebsd.org> In-reply-to: <54052DFA.4030808@freebsd.org> Cc: pkg@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin , Andrew Berg , FreeBSD Current , stable@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, "Sam Fourman Jr." X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 03:00:01 -0000 Julian Elischer wrote: > > You should try arguing with someone like Bank of Americas security and > operations > department You work for the same company as me? > some day about whether they want to suddenly upgrade 300 machines > for no real reason (from their perspective). > -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 03:03:24 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95817C7D; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 03:03:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2lp0211.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C81C01854; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 03:03:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BN3PR0301MB0835.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.154.145) by BN3PR0301MB0867.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.155.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1019.16; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 03:03:07 +0000 Received: from [IPv6:2601:2:4780:2fd:3cfa:1b41:db29:34df] (10.255.156.132) by BN3PR0301MB0835.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.154.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1015.19; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 03:03:05 +0000 Message-ID: <54053363.2030606@my.hennepintech.edu> Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:02:59 -0500 From: Andrew Berg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michelle Sullivan Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> <54052B1D.3040607@sorbs.net> In-Reply-To: <54052B1D.3040607@sorbs.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.255.156.132] X-ClientProxiedBy: CH1PR03CA005.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.156.150) To BN3PR0301MB0835.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.154.145) X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;UriScan:;UriScan:; X-Forefront-PRVS: 0322B4EDE1 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(6009001)(24454002)(51704005)(199003)(189002)(65956001)(87266999)(54356999)(105586002)(95666004)(76176999)(106356001)(90102001)(110136001)(89122001)(64126003)(65816999)(47776003)(81342001)(20776003)(80022001)(107046002)(64706001)(83506001)(101416001)(50986999)(81542001)(88552001)(85306004)(93886004)(59896002)(21056001)(99136001)(87976001)(83072002)(86362001)(74502001)(23676002)(75432001)(50466002)(79102001)(99396002)(102836001)(92726001)(74662001)(117636001)(77096002)(31966008)(46102001)(83322001)(85852003)(76482001)(77982001)(92566001)(4396001)(42186005)(89472002); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR0301MB0835; H:[IPv6:2601:2:4780:2fd:3cfa:1b41:db29:34df]; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:0; MX:1; LANG:en; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:; X-OriginatorOrg: my.hennepintech.edu Cc: pkg@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin , FreeBSD Current , stable@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, "Sam Fourman Jr." X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 03:03:24 -0000 On 2014.09.01 21:27, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > Actually it's an inconvenience for someone like me and you. Not for > many freebsd users, and certainly not for me 6 months ago if I hadn't > been writing my own ports.... oh and what was it, 1.3.6 -> 1.3.7? broke > shit... (badly) ... There were instructions for upgrading 1.3.6 to 1.3.7 alongside a notice that things would not be good if the instructions were not followed and an explanation of the issue. I think these kinds of notices need to reach more people, but of course, that is easier said than done. BTW, from what I have observed, 1.3.x issues have affected Poudriere users the most, binary package users a bit less (but still significantly), and pure ports users very little. >> Also, 9.3 is out and the 9.2 EOL is not far away. Not sure why you would be >> doing a new install with 9.2. >> > Try getting yourself a FreeBSD server at Softlayer... They still > install 7.x for Christ's sake (amongst others - but last time I checked, > on new servers, 8.4, 9.0, 9.1, 10.0*) Fair enough. > (not had time - because an EOL message is not a 'It will not > work after this date' message it is a 'you're unsupported after this > date and things *might* not work as expected' No, it means "we're not supporting this any more, so we don't care if there are new vulnerabilities or things stop working". I'm not going to dictate to other people what their upgrade schedule should be, but anyone running unsupported versions of software should not have any expectation that the ecosystem around it will be accommodating. The ports tree already requires a lot work to make sure everything works on supported versions of FreeBSD, and I see no reason whatsoever for anyone to put effort into making it work on EOL versions. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 03:03:29 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7710EFB; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 03:03:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2lp0240.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.240]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B189F1858; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 03:03:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2601:2:4780:2fd:3cfa:1b41:db29:34df] (10.255.156.132) by BY1PR0301MB0837.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.193.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1019.16; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 03:03:20 +0000 Message-ID: <54053372.6020009@my.hennepintech.edu> Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:03:14 -0500 From: Andrew Berg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Elischer , Michelle Sullivan , Sam Fourman Jr. Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> <54052DFA.4030808@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <54052DFA.4030808@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.255.156.132] X-ClientProxiedBy: CH1PR03CA010.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.156.155) To BY1PR0301MB0837.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.193.143) X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;UriScan:; X-Forefront-PRVS: 0322B4EDE1 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(6009001)(24454002)(189002)(199003)(80022001)(47776003)(87266999)(93886004)(99396002)(50466002)(50986999)(21056001)(75432001)(85306004)(117636001)(90102001)(59896002)(4396001)(88552001)(64706001)(86362001)(23676002)(65956001)(76176999)(54356999)(42186005)(101416001)(99136001)(20776003)(81542001)(87976001)(83322001)(102836001)(83506001)(77096002)(92566001)(92726001)(83072002)(85852003)(74502001)(74662001)(31966008)(65816999)(81342001)(106356001)(95666004)(64126003)(107046002)(79102001)(76482001)(46102001)(105586002)(77982001)(89122001)(89472002); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BY1PR0301MB0837; H:[IPv6:2601:2:4780:2fd:3cfa:1b41:db29:34df]; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:0; LANG:en; X-OriginatorOrg: my.hennepintech.edu Cc: ports@freebsd.org, pkg@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin , stable@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Current X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 03:03:29 -0000 On 2014.09.01 21:39, Julian Elischer wrote: > sigh.. when are we as a project, all going to learn that reality in > business is > that you often need to install stuff that is old. Its not always your > choice. > The custommers require it.. > You should try arguing with someone like Bank of Americas security and > operations > department some day about whether they want to suddenly upgrade 300 > machines > for no real reason (from their perspective). FreeBSD minor version upgrades are meant to be non-disruptive. However, I will admit that I have not performed any such upgrades in a critical environment, so if you think they are disruptive, please enlighten me with the details. Also, there are options out there for getting support for extended periods if you need it. Some companies are built around providing support for things that the original developers have long abandoned because some businesses need it. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 03:09:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1BB52CF; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 03:09:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (hades.sorbs.net [67.231.146.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95EDE18D2; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 03:09:10 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0NB9000627LOH900@hades.sorbs.net>; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 20:13:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-id: <540534D3.603@sorbs.net> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 05:09:07 +0200 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: Andrew Berg Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> <54052B1D.3040607@sorbs.net> <54053363.2030606@my.hennepintech.edu> In-reply-to: <54053363.2030606@my.hennepintech.edu> Cc: pkg@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin , FreeBSD Current , stable@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, "Sam Fourman Jr." X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 03:09:11 -0000 Andrew Berg wrote: > On 2014.09.01 21:27, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > >> Actually it's an inconvenience for someone like me and you. Not for >> many freebsd users, and certainly not for me 6 months ago if I hadn't >> been writing my own ports.... oh and what was it, 1.3.6 -> 1.3.7? broke >> shit... (badly) ... >> > There were instructions for upgrading 1.3.6 to 1.3.7 alongside a notice that > things would not be good if the instructions were not followed and an > explanation of the issue. I think these kinds of notices need to reach more > people, but of course, that is easier said than done. > BTW, from what I have observed, 1.3.x issues have affected Poudriere users the > most, binary package users a bit less (but still significantly), and pure ports > users very little. > I am a poudriere user... across 8.4, 9.0, 9.1, 9.2, 9.3, 10.0 on both i386 and amd64 :/ > >>> Also, 9.3 is out and the 9.2 EOL is not far away. Not sure why you would be >>> doing a new install with 9.2. >>> >>> >> Try getting yourself a FreeBSD server at Softlayer... They still >> install 7.x for Christ's sake (amongst others - but last time I checked, >> on new servers, 8.4, 9.0, 9.1, 10.0*) >> > Fair enough. > > >> (not had time - because an EOL message is not a 'It will not >> work after this date' message it is a 'you're unsupported after this >> date and things *might* not work as expected' >> > No, it means "we're not supporting this any more, so we don't care if there are > new vulnerabilities or things stop working". I'm not going to dictate to other > people what their upgrade schedule should be, but anyone running unsupported > versions of software should not have any expectation that the ecosystem around > it will be accommodating. > That's my point - there was a patch waiting to submit that knowingly broke pkg_install at midnight on the day after the EOL... the EOL shouldn't be an EOL - because it was really a 'portsnap after this date before you upgrade and you're screwed it won't work any more at all...' > The ports tree already requires a lot work to make sure everything works on > supported versions of FreeBSD, and I see no reason whatsoever for anyone to put > effort into making it work on EOL versions. > Some of us have production systems that span 6.0->10.0 (and most version in between) and are fighting fires with minimal help just trying to keep ahead.... -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 03:14:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32A134DC; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 03:14:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x230.google.com (mail-pa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE1F1198F; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 03:14:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id ey11so13499780pad.7 for ; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 20:14:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=oIfc7aJO58TuzASWK0RQ4jy+9Yhk4gChdAMQ5RMR7Rc=; b=zycZ+nOYpgKuCBnxLKkP+KaeaJuCNKVCzUGMDEYZtQ1+xXumgi5Bx6xoKozWutA4Fo iMVMVsXZwbJCykgRRUnT9azHo1jlQIy18HdDw54rrCQhKql75/QuhVirCen+zmmQXMHp oaWTS34WsjfzuB2047VZqsMCJDBbo6/8wYq1KwALwdL9LtQ5bZebiXkYQpr2pcvPuTob Bg2nAsepY9LCYL5KAtQAK7x+vSQn6LKlLE4D6L32KuT8By+zKL+YfwURA0YS8FfNQ/+R z+Y0EgZ1e7UQFUWX4z8L+5D7NyA7cGW/YLsQO++BbLegHrbkwfE6YK4tA50b7jyKvc36 ISgQ== X-Received: by 10.68.161.197 with SMTP id xu5mr560415pbb.160.1409627664154; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 20:14:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.20.5] (c-98-247-240-204.hsd1.wa.comcast.net. [98.247.240.204]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qa2sm3387221pdb.38.2014.09.01.20.14.23 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 01 Sep 2014 20:14:23 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_69E864F1-60BD-4D0B-BB04-34706E4AE5F6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool From: yaneurabeya@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <54053363.2030606@my.hennepintech.edu> Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 20:14:22 -0700 Message-Id: <8E432427-B3A8-4BF7-B54F-DE9B8CA268DC@gmail.com> References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> <54052B1D.3040607@sorbs.net> <54053363.2030606@my.hennepintech.edu> To: Andrew Berg X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Cc: pkg@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin , FreeBSD Current , stable@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, Michelle Sullivan , "Sam Fourman Jr." X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 03:14:25 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_69E864F1-60BD-4D0B-BB04-34706E4AE5F6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 On Sep 1, 2014, at 20:02, Andrew Berg = wrote: > On 2014.09.01 21:27, Michelle Sullivan wrote: >> Actually it's an inconvenience for someone like me and you. Not for >> many freebsd users, and certainly not for me 6 months ago if I hadn't >> been writing my own ports.... oh and what was it, 1.3.6 -> 1.3.7? = broke >> shit... (badly) ... > There were instructions for upgrading 1.3.6 to 1.3.7 alongside a = notice that > things would not be good if the instructions were not followed and an > explanation of the issue. I think these kinds of notices need to reach = more > people, but of course, that is easier said than done. > BTW, from what I have observed, 1.3.x issues have affected Poudriere = users the > most, binary package users a bit less (but still significantly), and = pure ports > users very little. >=20 >>> Also, 9.3 is out and the 9.2 EOL is not far away. Not sure why you = would be >>> doing a new install with 9.2. >>>=20 >> Try getting yourself a FreeBSD server at Softlayer... They still >> install 7.x for Christ's sake (amongst others - but last time I = checked, >> on new servers, 8.4, 9.0, 9.1, 10.0*) > Fair enough. >=20 >> (not had time - because an EOL message is not a 'It will not >> work after this date' message it is a 'you're unsupported after this >> date and things *might* not work as expected' > No, it means "we're not supporting this any more, so we don't care if = there are > new vulnerabilities or things stop working". I'm not going to dictate = to other > people what their upgrade schedule should be, but anyone running = unsupported > versions of software should not have any expectation that the = ecosystem around > it will be accommodating. > The ports tree already requires a lot work to make sure everything = works on > supported versions of FreeBSD, and I see no reason whatsoever for = anyone to put > effort into making it work on EOL versions. Installing pkgng on FreeBSD 7.x isn=92t impossible, but it does = require jumping through some hoops because xz not being present until = 8.x. These directions aren=92t complete (welcome to feedback if anyone = runs into issues), but they=92re a start: = https://github.com/yaneurabeya/scratch/blob/master/docs/cheatsheets/freebs= d . Cheers! -Garrett --Apple-Mail=_69E864F1-60BD-4D0B-BB04-34706E4AE5F6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUBTYOAAoJEMZr5QU6S73eHOQIALDlJRDBWsF358dhExXJBs5L X3+x6WrobmZKCaJvZ1E+hftAjebU6pj+PRphgBeKy5l17f6xLKezDI8R3cRSr3rD zpXt74/7j/UXU0rITlft6toMkrFsGRWdmAw1q06Bb+T+gkz6hGi228WcGxD+dePe zXBKpN1VBzueCU+ElFo3Fk4hnNIpcFeu/3NW3eH9zmVnU4+u0EGKLl9rQFiMOi4A aQXw4XQ+kF+BsiSzkUwPj8PRApZkk4KPmWzKJtUX5PhuqycPwpjaGh4qumsxCNuq LFXav5jgEdiYCJL1SCIJm8FbIrf0M1xlTpV43r0+kuTTCm2pNexlF41j80kvIUk= =MBj1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_69E864F1-60BD-4D0B-BB04-34706E4AE5F6-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 03:26:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81620C6F; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 03:26:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1blp0188.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.188]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A37F41AA2; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 03:26:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2601:2:4780:2fd:3cfa:1b41:db29:34df] (10.255.156.132) by CY1PR0301MB0843.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.163.149) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1019.16; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 03:26:06 +0000 Message-ID: <540538C6.8050505@my.hennepintech.edu> Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:25:58 -0500 From: Andrew Berg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michelle Sullivan Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> <54052B1D.3040607@sorbs.net> <54053363.2030606@my.hennepintech.edu> <540534D3.603@sorbs.net> In-Reply-To: <540534D3.603@sorbs.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.255.156.132] X-ClientProxiedBy: CH1PR03CA002.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.156.147) To CY1PR0301MB0843.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.163.149) X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;UriScan:; X-Forefront-PRVS: 0322B4EDE1 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(6009001)(189002)(199003)(24454002)(31966008)(74662001)(74502001)(77096002)(83322001)(50986999)(42186005)(59896002)(4396001)(93886004)(85306004)(99396002)(87266999)(76176999)(65816999)(99136001)(80316001)(54356999)(102836001)(110136001)(33656002)(46102001)(88552001)(21056001)(83506001)(64706001)(50466002)(101416001)(85852003)(83072002)(90102001)(79102001)(80022001)(23676002)(65956001)(86362001)(89122001)(76482001)(92726001)(64126003)(47776003)(20776003)(81342001)(81542001)(92566001)(77982001)(107046002)(75432001)(95666004)(87976001)(105586002)(106356001)(89472002); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:CY1PR0301MB0843; H:[IPv6:2601:2:4780:2fd:3cfa:1b41:db29:34df]; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:0; LANG:en; X-OriginatorOrg: my.hennepintech.edu Cc: pkg@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin , FreeBSD Current , stable@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, "Sam Fourman Jr." X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 03:26:12 -0000 On 2014.09.01 22:09, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > That's my point - there was a patch waiting to submit that knowingly > broke pkg_install at midnight on the day after the EOL... the EOL > shouldn't be an EOL - because it was really a 'portsnap after this date > before you upgrade and you're screwed it won't work any more at all...' As Peter outlined, this EOL was announced long ago, and it was mentioned at least once that it was to allow breaking changes. There really would be no reason to drop support for it in the ports tree if there were no plans to make changes. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 03:30:14 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 256A8F7E; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 03:30:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (hades.sorbs.net [67.231.146.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EEC51AE7; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 03:30:13 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0NB9000698KQH900@hades.sorbs.net>; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 20:34:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-id: <540539C0.7010008@sorbs.net> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 05:30:08 +0200 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: Andrew Berg Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> <54052B1D.3040607@sorbs.net> <54053363.2030606@my.hennepintech.edu> <540534D3.603@sorbs.net> <540538C6.8050505@my.hennepintech.edu> In-reply-to: <540538C6.8050505@my.hennepintech.edu> Cc: pkg@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin , FreeBSD Current , stable@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, "Sam Fourman Jr." X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 03:30:14 -0000 Andrew Berg wrote: > On 2014.09.01 22:09, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > >> That's my point - there was a patch waiting to submit that knowingly >> broke pkg_install at midnight on the day after the EOL... the EOL >> shouldn't be an EOL - because it was really a 'portsnap after this date >> before you upgrade and you're screwed it won't work any more at all...' >> > As Peter outlined, this EOL was announced long ago, and it was mentioned at > least once that it was to allow breaking changes. There really would be no > reason to drop support for it in the ports tree if there were no plans to make > changes. > The point is the EOL was not an EOL, it was a deadline, either switch or you're screwed, and it was communicated as an EOL not as a "here's a deadline, switch or you're screwed" -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 05:30:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1B1EEAB for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 05:30:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm18-vm4.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm18-vm4.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [216.109.115.83]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FA6D181E for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 05:30:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bellsouth.net; s=s1024; t=1409635498; bh=Fmw8HTmbFaH+0K3F4d4kstEnUKUKit87LiCPk4YnYHQ=; h=Received:Received:Received:DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:Message-ID:Date:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:From:To:CC:Subject; b=jl4o/fuv+ZazqJmysDoSBsCSkQGmmeyDJLU94sGcN59bA3+KOYs4EQFze2/wBx7F7RyI9o9QUqtNtBPraGzw5DBBQ7PMqbMV6+JJeFv1cIMXJJ/6khnWQgyePXi/Zm+T+tcbG2/lHannOz0fxXSkZl0ekoZa5qq+BJ/4hz577hA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=bellsouth.net; b=kIXCLegGdQ+NxMXrpnO/FqKk8fObrM0tZnirD0Nw1zxcsl8VrRvjoNJuDnGihaA80MgaCNBtFcwjg4OWu2TxAqV2hPV68M6YfqKF+UJ1WxTmhVuRS8nu9YiJGs9tvnwi2eOpojQc4fPKbW7w/b/6XKs+A2Z/LlVosdyPLcpywdA=; Received: from [66.196.81.155] by nm18.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Sep 2014 05:24:58 -0000 Received: from [98.139.244.52] by tm1.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Sep 2014 05:24:58 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp114.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Sep 2014 05:24:57 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bellsouth.net; s=s1024; t=1409635497; bh=Fmw8HTmbFaH+0K3F4d4kstEnUKUKit87LiCPk4YnYHQ=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:Message-ID:Date:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:From:To:CC:Subject; b=Nm5Yr7EKRYbM3KbghndQ5Bg3x8AqrrxMZtSyN5R2yvuAhMPCrCyLgSDV68vI25Pv7aQWYzgCrjSq1reAM8IQu6YD1lKSj05ieLiUHekuNv0MY40FiwO/ldyHKnm4VPMrd1XwDrYyzLUevVpwV4Gs9qAcUfyRnxA02Jzdr/zNpGs= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 986583.59626.bm@smtp114.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Message-ID: <986583.59626.bm@smtp114.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:24:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: EUFSfKcVM1ngyeGijMpPQvHeLow3rwf3FZVNzEB0GttSY0M RPDtvRoAbWXFFqskbkQ3TfvHlAhb3IZEBjnybMsidwyA5YLf6_O4a8UZ8rJl T9gLkDKHEqsIWKAcfuqjfCE2tswT0Xug08TlFXUepSN.6oYn1bcZO5KBa9jv IPu3DpXyyioVVpc8lWn9S1sDYiO4e1cyNvlPmsrhVCV3cjayDvLMlsAHFqM3 Z9BQiVajtZBr3XZP8.Ijk46kRgndyiAiKApv1dBPZy7jrLj9CVAfpf_eGU6s VkkOcmsaB9ZU4bK2SSByEm9W_FeCY1guPHRKKENfGNSYB7gFPU6txjqp0QlI JduyNDL7Nd_edIPJujxiuLc19ILTxYm8fC.BwliQSfeV2PCSSgVWRDbFbNGm uQjk7q_FsvQyESFWnDIY5NcxeJbjjKAu9mZn5o.zAgTCyg_PskJxGnqo942d KtU9O1_6YopMltuf2D39FInSitwkJRT2Nc7z2ACE5nhAoo9jS_Y05jA9nYnj WeMZn1tyrkpM0BXi7xyFySoJJFlHTBXZ_EJFLiM5oP_7kCE3uJUCz.foo.KZ gXBk8VFnBqMnFyBQ22tBTB5J7i.YMMXUW69LxZhmeoY2Q1o9Zm5Tjp.qvRSQ EhGE_B3M- X-Yahoo-SMTP: Kz_aW1.swBBYof3zAD7.RWzXz9ZAQVDMml1VADsbgPT4Kq79LC0- From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: wine (-devel) and i386-wine Cc: dbn@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 05:30:12 -0000 I read something about two days on www.freshports.org about wine and i386-wine that alters my plans. I tried to build i386-wine from i386 with the idea of using it both from i386 and amd64, in the latter case mounting the i386 partition on /compat/i386. But what I see makes that look not feasible. If I want to run wine from both i386 and amd64 (not at the same time), do I need to make separate installations on separate partitions? In that case, how do I avoid wasteful duplication in compiling? I am getting ready to rebuild/update FreeBSD-current and possibly 10.0-STABLE from source, am planning to also make a new i386 installation on a hard drive in a USB 2.0 and eSATA enclosure, using eSATA. I want to do this soon, at least for FreeBSD-current because, after running svn up on FreeBSD src tree from NetBSD, I saw an update in $SRCDIR/sys/dev/re/if_re.c and want to see if that works on my Ethernet. I also want the new NFS improvements. Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 06:11:00 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B21E52D for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 06:11:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [217.69.76.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D96461B55 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 06:10:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E20416A6020; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 08:10:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s826AueR034575; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 08:10:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: (from lars@localhost) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id s826AsSU034382; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 08:10:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 08:10:54 +0200 From: Lars Engels To: "Russell L. Carter" Subject: Re: chromium iconify->resurrect Message-ID: <20140902061054.GR57121@e-new.0x20.net> References: <5405173D.20902@pinyon.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JKGvNdIvrY8Ovf7Z" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5405173D.20902@pinyon.org> X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.4 X-Operation-System: FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE-p4 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 06:11:00 -0000 --JKGvNdIvrY8Ovf7Z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 06:02:53PM -0700, Russell L. Carter wrote: > Greetings, >=20 > I am curious if this is a problem that anyone else is seeing. > chromium 37.0.2062.94, current r269700M >=20 > Start up chromium, then immediately iconify it. Then try bringing it > back again. All I get (after a delay of several seconds) is a white > canvas in the correct size. Chromium does respond to window manager > commands (fvwm close, no destroy needed, in my case). >=20 Yup, same on PC-BSD. --JKGvNdIvrY8Ovf7Z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJUBV9uXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4RjQwMDE3RTRERjUzMTI1N0FGRTUxNDlF NTRDQjM3RDNBMDg5RDZEAAoJEOVMs306CJ1tIL8H/2h5fNKNA5f/EbLBMwbxayY8 Drg6javRgBxbcoYQLBW8wT8aQBmH32iHaVStOxzMVuCOisgVgJUoECIFGEDyle32 18hGWNizeaYwYOvjwvC8+l9Z/0zPDv1QvAE9nmPrw33Klu/CgMNznGrmdQNfGFXd WS4qtosviAI05Vni/pv7JO9noOSdpBFukdeMZ1JtvHFGhmsCXJc0E/cFRw4+FD+u t8n7o1Qlr18wzpjEN8fckTJqReXDSGlxwTI1MuVdjyyQm6R8iMArN8beeouzPZHe GRoZRMwr7XY9bdQIQRZGVirWiVeopUK/sQ8NdbcJE+rh9pOY+BdP1fkSj/VuHKw= =An0e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JKGvNdIvrY8Ovf7Z-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 06:16:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C9CB60F; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 06:16:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from qat.redports.org (qat.redports.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6420::233:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DFAD1C27; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 06:16:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redports.org; s=04012012; h=Sender:Message-Id:To:Subject:Reply-To:Date:To:Cc:From:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=IjD2Jj4jLYPVyLpY26X602vgxb3dcqO/DJbsukAHwF0=; b=NMiw14k2XkQ9H4PwQQkpYCw6t3oDqj0susSeAHBTTpnKZ1eal8WXbQHvNtdtMIxWui30xA9nyqRSpu8EteLiPOvQz6d5OhYi+Ltpny8shVpetjhYr4j8NLt3H20W01Xd1aUiYRwBQ/UBYDzBA7rB9YGVapxf+kG/IfSjq3m1/d8=; Received: from www by qat.redports.org with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1XOhOO-000KQJ-8K; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 06:16:36 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Ports-QAT" X-Trac-Version: 1.0.1 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 1.0.1, by Edgewall Software To: fjoe@FreeBSD.org X-Trac-Project: redports Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 06:16:36 -0000 Reply-To: qat@redports.org X-URL: https://qat.redports.org/ Subject: [QAT] 366822: 4x leftovers To: fjoe@FreeBSD.org X-Trac-Build-URL: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/20140831195001-42676 X-Trac-Build-ID: 20140831195001-42676 Message-Id: Sender: World Wide Web Owner Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, decke@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 06:16:37 -0000 Update to 1.0.4. PR: 192030 Submitted by: mail@ozzmosis.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- Build ID: 20140831195001-42676 Job owner: fjoe@FreeBSD.org Buildtime: 34 hours Enddate: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 06:16:35 GMT Revision: 366822 Repository: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=366822 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Port: net/binkd 1.0.4 Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~fjoe@FreeBSD.org/20140831195001-42676-407486/binkd-1.0.4.log Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~fjoe@FreeBSD.org/20140831195001-42676-407487/binkd-1.0.4.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~fjoe@FreeBSD.org/20140831195001-42676-407488/binkd-1.0.4.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~fjoe@FreeBSD.org/20140831195001-42676-407489/binkd-1.0.4.log -- Buildarchive URL: redports From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 08:15:16 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8F7DC2C for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 08:15:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.burggraben.net (base.exwg.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:140:50a2::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ns.exwg.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8694619D5 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 08:15:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFEE96003D5 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:15:13 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Scanned: by amavisd-new at exwg.net Received: from smtp.burggraben.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ns.burggraben.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h2kiIU7vbm1y for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:15:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from elch.exwg.net (elch.exwg.net [IPv6:2001:470:7b43:1:6a05:caff:fe01:aae9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "elch.exwg.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (verified OK)) by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:15:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: by elch.exwg.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C2DBF301E9; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:15:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:15:12 +0200 From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: chromium iconify->resurrect Message-ID: <20140902081512.GA1892@elch.exwg.net> References: <5405173D.20902@pinyon.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5405173D.20902@pinyon.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 08:15:16 -0000 ## Russell L. Carter (rcarter@pinyon.org): > Start up chromium, then immediately iconify it. Then try bringing it > back again. All I get (after a delay of several seconds) is a white > canvas in the correct size. Chromium does respond to window manager > commands (fvwm close, no destroy needed, in my case). Same here. Workaround: using "(Un)stick" from the windows commands brings back the window content (without having to exit chrome). Regards, Christoph -- Spare Space From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 08:45:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93FD5441; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 08:45:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from qat.redports.org (qat.redports.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6420::233:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 649751D80; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 08:45:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redports.org; s=04012012; h=Sender:Message-Id:To:Subject:Reply-To:Date:To:Cc:From:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=S7VTIG62bSoBm0UmjjKNOxHWmjnSusskYin1W4yxmgY=; b=YafAafQNWpKZB1U6EUly/XJvbSQoOdcC6d1xM0JUmzVqIHRfkSv4luLGMkH9TTHchxnbracCPJMWMMzFygs9l4uF8gZpsw+EwMZ2giSrESxW3lP8DhbchbUDHwzgkF7OZAvyf6a8bin6jnlvEkg5+JrGRNdWw49KdokquofDdXM=; Received: from www by qat.redports.org with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1XOjie-0006jg-A0; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 08:45:40 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Ports-QAT" X-Trac-Version: 1.0.1 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 1.0.1, by Edgewall Software To: hrs@FreeBSD.org X-Trac-Project: redports Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 08:45:40 -0000 Reply-To: qat@redports.org X-URL: https://qat.redports.org/ Subject: [QAT] 366827: 4x leftovers, 4x success, 4x depend (??? in print/texlive-docs) To: hrs@FreeBSD.org X-Trac-Build-URL: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/20140831202401-3144 X-Trac-Build-ID: 20140831202401-3144 Message-Id: Sender: World Wide Web Owner Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, decke@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 08:45:41 -0000 Split print/texlive-texmf into two ports, texlive-texmf and texlive-texmf-source. PR: 193202 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Build ID: 20140831202401-3144 Job owner: hrs@FreeBSD.org Buildtime: 36 hours Enddate: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 08:45:37 GMT Revision: 366827 Repository: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=366827 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Port: print/texlive-full 20140525_1 Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: DEPEND (??? IN PRINT/TEXLIVE-DOCS) Log: https://qat.redports.org//~hrs@FreeBSD.org/20140831202401-3144-407502/texlive-docs-20140525.log Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: DEPEND (??? IN PRINT/TEXLIVE-DOCS) Log: https://qat.redports.org//~hrs@FreeBSD.org/20140831202401-3144-407503/texlive-docs-20140525.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: DEPEND (??? IN PRINT/TEXLIVE-DOCS) Log: https://qat.redports.org//~hrs@FreeBSD.org/20140831202401-3144-407504/texlive-docs-20140525.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: DEPEND (??? IN PRINT/TEXLIVE-DOCS) Log: https://qat.redports.org//~hrs@FreeBSD.org/20140831202401-3144-407505/texlive-docs-20140525.log --------------------------------------------------------------------- Port: print/texlive-texmf 20140525_3 Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~hrs@FreeBSD.org/20140831202401-3144-407506/texlive-texmf-20140525_3.log Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~hrs@FreeBSD.org/20140831202401-3144-407507/texlive-texmf-20140525_3.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~hrs@FreeBSD.org/20140831202401-3144-407508/texlive-texmf-20140525_3.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~hrs@FreeBSD.org/20140831202401-3144-407509/texlive-texmf-20140525_3.log --------------------------------------------------------------------- Port: print/texlive-texmf-source 20140525 Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~hrs@FreeBSD.org/20140831202401-3144-407510/texlive-texmf-source-20140525.log Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~hrs@FreeBSD.org/20140831202401-3144-407511/texlive-texmf-source-20140525.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~hrs@FreeBSD.org/20140831202401-3144-407512/texlive-texmf-source-20140525.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~hrs@FreeBSD.org/20140831202401-3144-407513/texlive-texmf-source-20140525.log -- Buildarchive URL: redports From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 09:06:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84608A30; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 09:06:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51EB21FC7; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 09:06:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Julian-MBP3.local ([12.157.112.125]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8296W9E019214 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 2 Sep 2014 02:06:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <54058897.3080102@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 02:06:31 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michelle Sullivan Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> <54052DFA.4030808@freebsd.org> <540532AC.2070508@sorbs.net> In-Reply-To: <540532AC.2070508@sorbs.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: pkg@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin , Andrew Berg , FreeBSD Current , stable@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, "Sam Fourman Jr." X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 09:06:35 -0000 On 9/1/14, 7:59 PM, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > Julian Elischer wrote: >> You should try arguing with someone like Bank of Americas security and >> operations >> department > You work for the same company as me? in a past life, they were a customer. > >> some day about whether they want to suddenly upgrade 300 machines >> for no real reason (from their perspective). >> From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 09:08:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05553EB2 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 09:08:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7A301050 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 09:08:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Julian-MBP3.local ([12.157.112.125]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8298V6h019223 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 2 Sep 2014 02:08:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <5405890F.8080804@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 02:08:31 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Berg , Michelle Sullivan , "Sam Fourman Jr." Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> <54052DFA.4030808@freebsd.org> <54053372.6020009@my.hennepintech.edu> In-Reply-To: <54053372.6020009@my.hennepintech.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, pkg@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin , stable@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Current X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 09:08:42 -0000 On 9/1/14, 8:03 PM, Andrew Berg wrote: > On 2014.09.01 21:39, Julian Elischer wrote: >> sigh.. when are we as a project, all going to learn that reality in >> business is >> that you often need to install stuff that is old. Its not always your >> choice. >> The custommers require it.. >> You should try arguing with someone like Bank of Americas security and >> operations >> department some day about whether they want to suddenly upgrade 300 >> machines >> for no real reason (from their perspective). > FreeBSD minor version upgrades are meant to be non-disruptive. However, I will > admit that I have not performed any such upgrades in a critical environment, so > if you think they are disruptive, please enlighten me with the details. > Also, there are options out there for getting support for extended periods if > you need it. Some companies are built around providing support for things that > the original developers have long abandoned because some businesses need it. It's not how disruptive they are technically. it's how many months of shakedown testing you have to go through before they allow you to put new software on any production system. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 10:01:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC1BF6DB; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:01:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x22d.google.com (mail-la0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69BE11831; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:01:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f45.google.com with SMTP id pn19so7458516lab.18 for ; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 03:01:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=IC2n2vDgwapYwPjo9ewXT/200DplrWHAIg6ywc5jWb0=; b=YiWsA1yfE5vzxR63skZyZOEZCF5MKVlGjjbAZHwbAEGNEnSgP6QV6jpRqe/Jcu62uy 0Oz4a3AwoViYeeONA3voytwvXs15IhAuDSZTQkUWur47gGtkVVKSTLEYtr/upZUxnqKx KrGm74j3lKmqqwNByLntg+sQai40Yx9F7WNnKrcaBQ82yvy2HQW7o+t5HzVRsVP0ZbbH 5CRKa26RWqqdyfPOHw1UqVxNcX4KtZtIcM0QbElY3STRCbZitw/ahnApHONVR5xhMi7v u4nYRxLCJmA/86C3GSZ2aL3SmcVqa24BTuolCFWJiy4QsRiRg9bqNxVtgHD3GkZA+OTr En5w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.29.1 with SMTP id f1mr33160128lah.47.1409652073201; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 03:01:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.179.4 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 03:01:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5405890F.8080804@freebsd.org> References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> <54052DFA.4030808@freebsd.org> <54053372.6020009@my.hennepintech.edu> <5405890F.8080804@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 12:01:13 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool From: Alban Hertroys To: Julian Elischer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: pkg@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin , Andrew Berg , FreeBSD Current , stable@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, Michelle Sullivan , "Sam Fourman Jr." X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 10:01:17 -0000 On 2 September 2014 11:08, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 9/1/14, 8:03 PM, Andrew Berg wrote: >> >> On 2014.09.01 21:39, Julian Elischer wrote: >>> >>> sigh.. when are we as a project, all going to learn that reality in >>> business is >>> that you often need to install stuff that is old. Its not always your >>> choice. >>> The custommers require it.. >>> You should try arguing with someone like Bank of Americas security and >>> operations >>> department some day about whether they want to suddenly upgrade 300 >>> machines >>> for no real reason (from their perspective). >> >> FreeBSD minor version upgrades are meant to be non-disruptive. However, I >> will >> admit that I have not performed any such upgrades in a critical >> environment, so >> if you think they are disruptive, please enlighten me with the details. >> Also, there are options out there for getting support for extended periods >> if >> you need it. Some companies are built around providing support for things >> that >> the original developers have long abandoned because some businesses need >> it. > > > It's not how disruptive they are technically. > it's how many months of shakedown testing you have to go through before they > allow you to put new software on any production system. Just adding here, in commercial environments things don't change quickly or easily. Whether this applies to the current issue with pkg is not for me to say. For example, certain commercial upstream software vendors require to go through a certification process before they even consider supporting the new software you intend to use with theirs. Admittedly we haven't run into this issue in relation to FreeBSD, but we certainly have with Firefox. As an example, the last version of Firefox that Information Builders' WebFOCUS 7.7 supports is 3.6.7 (currently available versions are 31 or 32!) and for Internet Explorer that's 7 (currently at 11). If you run into any kind of problem, the standard answer is to use a browser that they support. Good luck with that! Firefox 3.6.7 was released on July 20, 2010; over 4 years ago. In such cases you're more or less required to keep an old system around that still has such old packages, if only to see if you can reproduce any issues you encounter (with modern versions of your software) on those old versions. With the deprecation of the old pkg_* tools you run into a conflict; You can either update packages that are _not_ under certification for such a vendor and get security updates and fixes using the new pkg, or you have to stick with the certified software and _not_ get any security updates or fixes. It gets more interesting if you have to deal with manufacturing processes (something we're looking to use FreeBSD for to replace our current OpenVMS systems before they go out of support), as often automatons write data to external databases and such software resides in PLC's. Manufacturing equipment tends to age and the kind of external databases they support is limited to what was available when they were new and the capabilities of the PLC involved. I can totally understand that at some point it starts to get impossible to maintain two separate packaging systems and I understand that you think 2 years is enough time to shake things out, but software vendors aren't that quick. For many, 2 years is a short time. Just saying... -- If you can't see the forest for the trees, Cut the trees and you'll see there is no forest. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 10:21:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDB94D56 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:21:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C99A21A6B for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:21:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s82ALldu097070 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:21:47 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id s82ALlG8097069; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:21:47 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201409021021.s82ALlG8097069@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:21:47 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 10:21:48 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ japanese/skk-jisyo | 201302 | 201409 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ japanese/skk-jisyo-cdb | 201302 | 201409 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 10:25:20 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A587E5F; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:25:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-x236.google.com (mail-ob0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C103B1A94; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:25:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f182.google.com with SMTP id va2so4593385obc.41 for ; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 03:25:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=k9IGqrh4dy6VCY9a7YKu7ZexWr6KRD28gf1AJvHR3to=; b=CTL/X9RJdWeQb+QKYnV8dHL67lYjFHuiafciVJwmImhX488+c812BlqDE0O6PceNmQ x5lDeNtjwckONdVL5AvH/n13ZW8sPoD4HXPTMWXPki8RsS0wtty9kZKgCqn56MpyGrvO FJ/uw0Ji7cM4QbmmllOOgpiVd+T6XQBboAU6waKh9+wGZNp7+603wjJ861Rjd/tEjhmE nX7YZ9XLMYHvuFG1hTbEWgroa6P3Ivcvr6NyhWDGqdHkhzTBy+hdswlaVDxSLmRHE9LM J3TYVXKifuGTUTzkNx96ramDv4ZQ9D42kU8nO02TBSgq+XOVXdvbIvz6ck33DYJ7ChWb tAiA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.87.167 with SMTP id az7mr31235335obb.41.1409653519029; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 03:25:19 -0700 (PDT) Sender: robbak@gmail.com Received: by 10.76.26.170 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 03:25:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <540539C0.7010008@sorbs.net> References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> <54052B1D.3040607@sorbs.net> <54053363.2030606@my.hennepintech.edu> <540534D3.603@sorbs.net> <540538C6.8050505@my.hennepintech.edu> <540539C0.7010008@sorbs.net> Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 20:25:18 +1000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: w_tw4vUZNHB9rQB2WlCyJCQZKjk Message-ID: Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool From: Robert Backhaus To: Michelle Sullivan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: pkg@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin , Andrew Berg , FreeBSD Current , stable@freebsd.org, ports , "Sam Fourman Jr." X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 10:25:20 -0000 On 2 September 2014 13:30, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > Andrew Berg wrote: > > On 2014.09.01 22:09, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > > > >> That's my point - there was a patch waiting to submit that knowingly > >> broke pkg_install at midnight on the day after the EOL... the EOL > >> shouldn't be an EOL - because it was really a 'portsnap after this date > >> before you upgrade and you're screwed it won't work any more at all...' > >> > > As Peter outlined, this EOL was announced long ago, and it was mentioned > at > > least once that it was to allow breaking changes. There really would be > no > > reason to drop support for it in the ports tree if there were no plans > to make > > changes. > > > > The point is the EOL was not an EOL, it was a deadline, either switch or > you're screwed, and it was communicated as an EOL not as a "here's a > deadline, switch or you're screwed" > > -- > Michelle Sullivan > http://www.mhix.org/ > The point is the EOL was *actually* an EOL: a deadline, either switch or you're screwed, and it was communicated as an EOL: a "here's a deadline, switch or you're screwed" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 10:53:10 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 235A7D89; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:53:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtprelay03.ispgateway.de (smtprelay03.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A19A81E11; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:53:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [80.67.16.118] (helo=webmailfront01.ispgateway.de) by smtprelay03.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1XOlho-0003hY-Pw; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 12:52:56 +0200 Received: from his1.his.de (his1.his.de [192.124.237.237]) by webmail.df.eu (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 12:52:56 +0200 Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 12:52:56 +0200 Message-ID: <20140902125256.Horde.uv31ztwymThxUZ-OYPQoBw1@webmail.df.eu> From: Marcus von Appen To: stable@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, pkg@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> <54052DFA.4030808@freebsd.org> <54053372.6020009@my.hennepintech.edu> <5405890F.8080804@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Reply-to: mva@freebsd.org User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H5 (6.0.4) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline X-Df-Sender: ZnJlZWJzZEBzeXNmYXVsdC5vcmc= X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 10:53:10 -0000 Alban Hertroys : > On 2 September 2014 11:08, Julian Elischer wrote: >> On 9/1/14, 8:03 PM, Andrew Berg wrote: >>> >>> On 2014.09.01 21:39, Julian Elischer wrote: >>>> >>>> sigh.. when are we as a project, all going to learn that reality in >>>> business is >>>> that you often need to install stuff that is old. Its not always your >>>> choice. >>>> The custommers require it.. >>>> You should try arguing with someone like Bank of Americas security and >>>> operations >>>> department some day about whether they want to suddenly upgrade 300 >>>> machines >>>> for no real reason (from their perspective). >>> >>> FreeBSD minor version upgrades are meant to be non-disruptive. However, I >>> will >>> admit that I have not performed any such upgrades in a critical >>> environment, so >>> if you think they are disruptive, please enlighten me with the details. >>> Also, there are options out there for getting support for extended periods >>> if >>> you need it. Some companies are built around providing support for things >>> that >>> the original developers have long abandoned because some businesses need >>> it. >> >> >> It's not how disruptive they are technically. >> it's how many months of shakedown testing you have to go through before they >> allow you to put new software on any production system. > > Just adding here, in commercial environments things don't change > quickly or easily. Whether this applies to the current issue with pkg > is not for me to say. > > For example, certain commercial upstream software vendors require to > go through a certification process before they even consider > supporting the new software you intend to use with theirs. > > Admittedly we haven't run into this issue in relation to FreeBSD, but > we certainly have with Firefox. As an example, the last version of > Firefox that Information Builders' WebFOCUS 7.7 supports is 3.6.7 > (currently available versions are 31 or 32!) and for Internet Explorer > that's 7 (currently at 11). > If you run into any kind of problem, the standard answer is to use a > browser that they support. Good luck with that! > Firefox 3.6.7 was released on July 20, 2010; over 4 years ago. > > In such cases you're more or less required to keep an old system > around that still has such old packages, if only to see if you can > reproduce any issues you encounter (with modern versions of your > software) on those old versions. > > With the deprecation of the old pkg_* tools you run into a conflict; > You can either update packages that are _not_ under certification for > such a vendor and get security updates and fixes using the new pkg, or > you have to stick with the certified software and _not_ get any > security updates or fixes. > > > It gets more interesting if you have to deal with manufacturing > processes (something we're looking to use FreeBSD for to replace our > current OpenVMS systems before they go out of support), as often > automatons write data to external databases and such software resides > in PLC's. Manufacturing equipment tends to age and the kind of > external databases they support is limited to what was available when > they were new and the capabilities of the PLC involved. > > I can totally understand that at some point it starts to get > impossible to maintain two separate packaging systems and I understand > that you think 2 years is enough time to shake things out, but > software vendors aren't that quick. For many, 2 years is a short time. > It also should be noted that everyone had enough time to raise those issues in the time between tthe announcement and now. No one did. Now that it is gone, they are brought up, while they should have been long time ago instead. It can't work that way. My 2 cents in this discussion :-). Cheers Marcus From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 11:05:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12EFE2DB for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 11:05:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay.andxor.it (relay.andxor.it [78.134.40.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 513FE1F6E for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 11:05:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4652 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2014 11:05:01 -0000 Received: from alex.andxor.it (a.premoli@andxor.it@192.168.2.30) by relay.andxor.it with ESMTPSA; 2 Sep 2014 11:05:01 -0000 Message-ID: <5405A45C.4040106@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 13:05:00 +0200 From: Alex Dupre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Russell L. Carter" , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: poudriere and DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES References: <54050C82.7090607@pinyon.org> In-Reply-To: <54050C82.7090607@pinyon.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:05:12 -0000 Russell L. Carter ha scritto: > However, what I would like to learn is if poudriere > is able to understand DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=YES, and if so, how to > enable it. I'm not asking a political question here, just a technical > one. If this is possible, how do I do it? NO_IGNORE= yes -- Alex Dupre From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 11:47:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BDAB1BA; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 11:47:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (hades.sorbs.net [67.231.146.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D36214BE; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 11:47:36 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0NB90030JVLPSK00@hades.sorbs.net>; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 04:51:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-id: <5405AE54.60809@sorbs.net> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 13:47:32 +0200 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: mva@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> <54052DFA.4030808@freebsd.org> <54053372.6020009@my.hennepintech.edu> <5405890F.8080804@freebsd.org> <20140902125256.Horde.uv31ztwymThxUZ-OYPQoBw1@webmail.df.eu> In-reply-to: <20140902125256.Horde.uv31ztwymThxUZ-OYPQoBw1@webmail.df.eu> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, pkg@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:47:37 -0000 Marcus von Appen wrote: > Alban Hertroys : > >> >> I can totally understand that at some point it starts to get >> impossible to maintain two separate packaging systems and I understand >> that you think 2 years is enough time to shake things out, but >> software vendors aren't that quick. For many, 2 years is a short time. >> > > It also should be noted that everyone had enough time to raise those > issues > in the time between tthe announcement and now. No one did. Now that it is > gone, they are brought up, while they should have been long time ago > instead. It can't work that way. > > My 2 cents in this discussion :-). Actually I brought it up as soon as I found the EOL was a deadline for breaking pkg_* tools, was told, "too late now" - that was more than 2 weeks ago, less than 2 months ago (forget the date) ... I'm happy with an EOL and working to upgrade everything, I'm not happy that the EOL was not actually an EOL and it was actually a deadline. -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 12:08:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C509BB44; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 12:08:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from theravensnest.org (theraven.freebsd.your.org [216.14.102.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cloud.theravensnest.org", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A21061875; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 12:08:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c106.sec.cl.cam.ac.uk (c106.sec.cl.cam.ac.uk [128.232.18.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by theravensnest.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s82C8Kpp037492 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 2 Sep 2014 12:08:22 GMT (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool From: David Chisnall In-Reply-To: <5405AE54.60809@sorbs.net> Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 13:08:20 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0B55DEDF-7268-4E7A-8971-36AB68D0C170@FreeBSD.org> References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> <54052DFA.4030808@freebsd.org> <54053372.6020009@my.hennepintech.edu> <5405890F.8080804@freebsd.org> <20140902125256.Horde.uv31ztwymThxUZ-OYPQoBw1@webmail.df.eu> <5405AE54.60809@sorbs.net> To: Michelle Sullivan X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, pkg@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, mva@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 12:08:33 -0000 On 2 Sep 2014, at 12:47, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > I'm not happy that the EOL was > not actually an EOL and it was actually a deadline. I'm not sure what you think the difference is. The EOL says 'the = FreeBSD project no longer supports this configuration'. If you are not = relying on us for support (i.e. using an old or forked ports tree, or = building your own packages), then things will continue to work. If you = are expecting (unpaid, volunteer) support from the project in the form = of packages and a useable ports tree, then you need to use a supported = configuration. If being able to use the ports tree without installing pkg(8) is = sufficiently valuable to you, then I can put you in touch with some = companies that will backport things to a copy of the ports tree for your = use (although the price tag will scale with the number of ports that you = want to support). If, however, your complaint is that it's hard to get new software = certified for your system *then this change has absolutely no effect on = you!* If you're not worried about upgrading ports at all, then you can = just stick with the ports tree version from the time of your release. = If you're able to upgrade ports, then upgrading the pkg port should not = be an issue. David From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 12:54:58 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70D14D46 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 12:54:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x244.google.com (mail-pa0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::244]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EC1A1174 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 12:54:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f68.google.com with SMTP id eu11so9481892pac.3 for ; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 05:54:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:reply-to:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type :thread-index:content-language; bh=fUxFOIqsECxiHcnBDVSvtEwqN9Oe8IA/ISd2REPP/Kw=; b=sKDotUdqEwM6DPqzaJHA/01REkedGKv+W1halVI+TYW3W7+7UOd2aBVUHxCe0GCN5j /dpoJAZqGbuZ0cNkaA7WzwGsFrm1y4IPRfnpXHHFSLXv5AOHZ1hWe93X3vZltBtQU1rp J+vKJoNrcVUSK0YvhSKSz4ZL6K8586iqMZEzr1c8OSnamrLWerRxGj5ycZH0wBHLDMCf 9cx0nW/kQrEXUD5Dx9gW8uSq1lTXVd1eIyQBhrN6ku/vVk/aEgIX8LTDrmMUJDV0a/w/ 0v25LK8oltREkVMsQCfrBMGJo9l3uwq1OmanSRxjZDtdAZLaqT7wa4Q/CVFwPfibJNX6 Dwyw== X-Received: by 10.70.56.10 with SMTP id w10mr7306806pdp.135.1409662497736; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 05:54:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spidersPC ([122.177.202.97]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fl15sm5351114pdb.92.2014.09.02.05.54.55 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Sep 2014 05:54:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5405be21.2f66460a.248e.ffff9b7f@mx.google.com> X-Google-Original-Message-ID: <077701cfc6ad$127c6da0$377548e0$@barman12@gmail.com> Reply-To: From: "Abha Barman" To: Subject: Design & Development Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 18:24:42 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Ac/GrQuZNXoo/uCPSxqINOmCj3IqAg== Content-Language: en-us x-cr-hashedpuzzle: NdQ= AUky ApYI BQL2 BXGx Bl/n Btsp CA7P D2XV GhSQ H5bf Iig3 I+LQ J2ll KXgw K5YM; 1; cABvAHIAdABzAEAAZgByAGUAZQBiAHMAZAAuAG8AcgBnAA==; Sosha1_v1; 7; {66E2FB51-D20B-45DB-9F95-C987E6F6152D}; YQBiAGgAYQAuAGIAYQByAG0AYQBuADEAMgBAAGcAbQBhAGkAbAAuAGMAbwBtAA==; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 12:54:37 GMT; RABlAHMAaQBnAG4AIAAmACAARABlAHYAZQBsAG8AcABtAGUAbgB0AA== x-cr-puzzleid: {66E2FB51-D20B-45DB-9F95-C987E6F6152D} Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 12:54:58 -0000 Hi, We are one of the reputed Web-solutions Firms with the core skills in website design/development and would like to collaborate with you. We have earned 5000+ hours working experience in developing the professional design with attractive approach in the latest technologies like Joomla, Magento, Zencart, WordPress, Code Igniter (CI), Core PHP, OS Commerce etc. We do have feasible and customized prices for our designing/development based on the requirements. Therefore, I would highly appreciate if you could share your design/development needs with references. Do let us know if you are interested in designing/developing the sites and I can share you the detail information for proceeding further. I would be happy to share our Work Portfolio, Client testimonials and Methodologies. We have vast experience in dealing with the clients across the globe; most of our clients are from USA, UK, Australia, Canada, Singapore and Netherlands. We have a strong, highly experienced and dedicated team with relative experience in developing the websites. Our creative team is competent enough to convert your ideas into the real working websites. Thanks for your time and assistance. Waiting for your response. Regards, Abha Barman From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 13:37:30 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40050C52; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 13:37:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com (mail-wi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36CCF1825; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 13:37:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id cc10so7419845wib.6 for ; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 06:37:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=/98x4GdfqDGMHKxvPm9QzQPxM1yht2GzTWUUCQez8N8=; b=wqy3GkXsuuGDwBLKpzbmhfzL5LRP+LujBQaJzAyTDqa/DJFbaUVpwe0Ydh9C3k6pzi P31nZ5PZQoCkwuPCfQKiodQaxnAuDnGyb3Ls4IbgT5XPiAqAUJXexgXsiROc14lUn1/R NXzHJTQTzCVCoTEItKgeS1grx7eLaVwPYricEckCjoQO4DxBFKs0VVfcXbVOsXSFGohv 1owHc0XNrv2yae5hgzHEK/SFrh42kDgRBD8AozK9Q2cSdwH0psEHYNH6YETh3UwnxsOf QFffGVVBBdyq36heJoehRrvFLUT+WBctNjEy4Lsz4rG4f2HKM9Rm1CZYTYQe6hY7kp5c BQqw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.12.173 with SMTP id z13mr5159697wib.53.1409665046312; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 06:37:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.217.2.18 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 06:37:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140902125256.Horde.uv31ztwymThxUZ-OYPQoBw1@webmail.df.eu> References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> <54052DFA.4030808@freebsd.org> <54053372.6020009@my.hennepintech.edu> <5405890F.8080804@freebsd.org> <20140902125256.Horde.uv31ztwymThxUZ-OYPQoBw1@webmail.df.eu> Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 09:37:26 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool From: Brandon Allbery To: mva@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, pkg@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 13:37:30 -0000 On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Marcus von Appen wrote: > It also should be noted that everyone had enough time to raise those issues > in the time between tthe announcement and now > If this is an issue that needed to be brought up, then FreeBSD has apparently never before been used in an enterprise??? -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 13:46:56 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54CFF19E for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 13:46:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1867A1957 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 13:46:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s82Dktao051224 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 13:46:55 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from bdrewery@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id s82DktrG051223 for ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 13:46:55 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery) Received: (qmail 72000 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2014 08:46:51 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.0.24?) (freebsd@shatow.net@10.10.0.24) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 2 Sep 2014 08:46:51 -0500 Message-ID: <5405CA1B.2040307@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 08:46:03 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michelle Sullivan , Andrew Berg Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> <54052B1D.3040607@sorbs.net> In-Reply-To: <54052B1D.3040607@sorbs.net> OpenPGP: id=6E4697CF; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan2.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6G4B6moeWhpM3KfU6P1ao0eIQcNeCCdbu" Cc: pkg@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin , FreeBSD Current , stable@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, "Sam Fourman Jr." X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 13:46:56 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --6G4B6moeWhpM3KfU6P1ao0eIQcNeCCdbu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 9/1/2014 9:27 PM, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > oh and what was it, 1.3.6 -> 1.3.7? broke > shit... (badly) ... What broke? I am not aware of any new regressions in 1.3.7. --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery --6G4B6moeWhpM3KfU6P1ao0eIQcNeCCdbu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUBcofAAoJEDXXcbtuRpfPyioH/16aV4b62T/5obGJ2G+toY5U 2Ooh5AV+LrYbIKSW+uNP6goayOpjlSFBwG1g8jMo1+W1nj9LL9D2q4KjPbmXczXe x63bvJkoZzM6iBEFK0ZiNGzTu2ynL3vEB6xH8EqtSCwYWre8R2kCc6uI0S17oJAL FqMF7STvgzrO1dz97/SG7wtl2x9itx+e+YGLlr/N5wKLsE1FryTZbTz5ebiC3Rf2 05sBIG5vyGS1KfwaQCGHLzqNA+gKHkeDsF1KgZ7M18wCB7MF8bQZ02LK+mQGH2rK r5be9eP6LrECSCaunfvvvnnnsNIzUv2bt+gF6eLYYOQ51h3Js0UuPM7A142KJrI= =95C5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6G4B6moeWhpM3KfU6P1ao0eIQcNeCCdbu-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 14:19:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AD96FC0 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 14:19:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from quine.pinyon.org (quine.pinyon.org [65.101.5.249]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12F7C1CE6 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 14:19:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by quine.pinyon.org (Postfix, from userid 122) id 9739C1609BD; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 07:19:07 -0700 (MST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on quine.pinyon.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from feyerabend.n1.pinyon.org (feyerabend.n1.pinyon.org [10.0.10.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by quine.pinyon.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 39F3E160233 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 07:19:05 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <5405D1D9.9000709@pinyon.org> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 07:19:05 -0700 From: "Russell L. Carter" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: chromium iconify->resurrect References: <5405173D.20902@pinyon.org> <20140902081512.GA1892@elch.exwg.net> In-Reply-To: <20140902081512.GA1892@elch.exwg.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 14:19:09 -0000 On 09/02/14 01:15, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: > ## Russell L. Carter (rcarter@pinyon.org): > >> Start up chromium, then immediately iconify it. Then try bringing it >> back again. All I get (after a delay of several seconds) is a white >> canvas in the correct size. Chromium does respond to window manager >> commands (fvwm close, no destroy needed, in my case). > > Same here. Workaround: using "(Un)stick" from the windows commands > brings back the window content (without having to exit chrome). Huh. That works. Twenty years of fvwm and I never used that before... Thanks, Russell > Regards, > Christoph > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 14:30:27 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7073EB03; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 14:30:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtprelay05.ispgateway.de (smtprelay05.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D3041EB9; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 14:30:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [80.67.16.118] (helo=webmailfront01.ispgateway.de) by smtprelay05.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1XOoyD-0000Fx-UV; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 16:22:05 +0200 Received: from his1.his.de (his1.his.de [192.124.237.237]) by webmail.df.eu (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 16:22:05 +0200 Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 16:22:05 +0200 Message-ID: <20140902162205.Horde._7jSRVzORy7dvrf149pEyw1@webmail.df.eu> From: Marcus von Appen To: Brandon Allbery Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> <54052DFA.4030808@freebsd.org> <54053372.6020009@my.hennepintech.edu> <5405890F.8080804@freebsd.org> <20140902125256.Horde.uv31ztwymThxUZ-OYPQoBw1@webmail.df.eu> In-Reply-To: Reply-to: mva@freebsd.org User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H5 (6.0.4) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline X-Df-Sender: ZnJlZWJzZEBzeXNmYXVsdC5vcmc= Cc: ports@freebsd.org, pkg@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 14:30:27 -0000 Brandon Allbery : > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Marcus von Appen wrote: > >> It also should be noted that everyone had enough time to raise those issues >> in the time between tthe announcement and now >> > > If this is an issue that needed to be brought up, then FreeBSD has > apparently never before been used in an enterprise??? I'm tempted to ask, if the enterprise has SLAs to ensure continuity, even after the official support has ended? ;-) Cheers Marcus From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 15:21:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72C59BD7; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 15:21:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x232.google.com (mail-pa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B13015D5; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 15:21:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id kq14so15024840pab.37 for ; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 08:21:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=RM0DjhXDiVwKblsuCnkr+SD80Xp9nHM663HDvxNEklI=; b=C6zwB5DytJX4sv4cw3f3OSJ9SCHNbSCAROLxtuK00Pbik24wdN8UsA3D2u/SoFKbI0 PZ6UNtoB4SqZo3cGjob9QxyF+arivOw9WQj4vOWeqkHvCZ8y55CvA4QKT9jT+C9Vr87k +MBMBYKPk6nSbcySyqmPV96LyZ4s5xOFfHa+ka9JGTdag3WIuPX4HzSNAoD83Vmr+5Tk BzVFnufPOpfDBq3ZHwe3cVR2GqqYXmLqCycaenPSxXk4fA8N9KFmfD7Svnptgaj3JaZR xhpa/4tKvb36rJ0iWbbWwZxN0gMY70tpJ9ih3V82Q7ag1Bdy0PrVHs+4IOHYiTCwve2T lzZQ== X-Received: by 10.70.91.208 with SMTP id cg16mr48085651pdb.91.1409671300627; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 08:21:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.20.11] (c-98-247-240-204.hsd1.wa.comcast.net. [98.247.240.204]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fn4sm12257960pab.39.2014.09.02.08.21.39 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Sep 2014 08:21:39 -0700 (PDT) References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> <54052DFA.4030808@freebsd.org> <54053372.6020009@my.hennepintech.edu> <5405890F.8080804@freebsd.org> <20140902125256.Horde.uv31ztwymThxUZ-OYPQoBw1@webmail.df.eu> <5405AE54.60809@sorbs.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <5405AE54.60809@sorbs.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1D2B4A91-E76C-43A0-BE75-D926357EF1AF@gmail.com> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11D257) From: Garrett Cooper Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 08:21:38 -0700 To: Michelle Sullivan Cc: "ports@freebsd.org" , "pkg@freebsd.org" , "stable@freebsd.org" , "mva@freebsd.org" , "current@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 15:21:41 -0000 > On Sep 2, 2014, at 4:47, Michelle Sullivan wrote: >=20 > Marcus von Appen wrote: >> Alban Hertroys : >>=20 >>>=20 >>> I can totally understand that at some point it starts to get >>> impossible to maintain two separate packaging systems and I understand >>> that you think 2 years is enough time to shake things out, but >>> software vendors aren't that quick. For many, 2 years is a short time. >>=20 >> It also should be noted that everyone had enough time to raise those >> issues >> in the time between tthe announcement and now. No one did. Now that it is= >> gone, they are brought up, while they should have been long time ago >> instead. It can't work that way. >>=20 >> My 2 cents in this discussion :-). >=20 > Actually I brought it up as soon as I found the EOL was a deadline for > breaking pkg_* tools, was told, "too late now" - that was more than 2 > weeks ago, less than 2 months ago (forget the date) ... I'm happy with > an EOL and working to upgrade everything, I'm not happy that the EOL was > not actually an EOL and it was actually a deadline. Hi Michelle, One subtle point that I wanted to ask for clarification is you thought t= he EOL announcement for pkg_install was going to be "pkg_install is no longe= r going to be supported, but you can still use it", instead of "pkg_install s= upport is going to be removed from the tree" -- is that correct? You'd probably hate to do this, but forking the sources and changing fro= m portsnap to a git or svn backed ports tree that downloads a tarball snapsh= ot might be the best resolution to this issue now... Thanks! -Garrett= From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 15:40:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE5BBFD3; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 15:40:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (hades.sorbs.net [67.231.146.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA661969; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 15:40:41 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0NBA0031V6E6SK00@hades.sorbs.net>; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 08:44:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-id: <5405E4F5.4090902@sorbs.net> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 17:40:37 +0200 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: Garrett Cooper Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> <54052DFA.4030808@freebsd.org> <54053372.6020009@my.hennepintech.edu> <5405890F.8080804@freebsd.org> <20140902125256.Horde.uv31ztwymThxUZ-OYPQoBw1@webmail.df.eu> <5405AE54.60809@sorbs.net> <1D2B4A91-E76C-43A0-BE75-D926357EF1AF@gmail.com> In-reply-to: <1D2B4A91-E76C-43A0-BE75-D926357EF1AF@gmail.com> Cc: "ports@freebsd.org" , "pkg@freebsd.org" , "stable@freebsd.org" , "mva@freebsd.org" , "current@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 15:40:41 -0000 Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Sep 2, 2014, at 4:47, Michelle Sullivan wrote: >> >> Marcus von Appen wrote: >> >>> Alban Hertroys : >>> >>> >>>> I can totally understand that at some point it starts to get >>>> impossible to maintain two separate packaging systems and I understand >>>> that you think 2 years is enough time to shake things out, but >>>> software vendors aren't that quick. For many, 2 years is a short time. >>>> >>> It also should be noted that everyone had enough time to raise those >>> issues >>> in the time between tthe announcement and now. No one did. Now that it is >>> gone, they are brought up, while they should have been long time ago >>> instead. It can't work that way. >>> >>> My 2 cents in this discussion :-). >>> >> Actually I brought it up as soon as I found the EOL was a deadline for >> breaking pkg_* tools, was told, "too late now" - that was more than 2 >> weeks ago, less than 2 months ago (forget the date) ... I'm happy with >> an EOL and working to upgrade everything, I'm not happy that the EOL was >> not actually an EOL and it was actually a deadline. >> > > Hi Michelle, > One subtle point that I wanted to ask for clarification is you thought the EOL announcement for pkg_install was going to be "pkg_install is no longer going to be supported, but you can still use it", instead of "pkg_install support is going to be removed from the tree" -- is that correct? > 100% correct! (thank you for being one of the few to see the subtle but *very* important difference) > You'd probably hate to do this, but forking the sources and changing from portsnap to a git or svn backed ports tree that downloads a tarball snapshot might be the best resolution to this issue now... > This is my only option - however, I suspect I'm already f**ked - my build servers kicked off at 4am and the non pkg jails automatically converted themselves to pkg.. the pkg jails obviously continued... however I now have a repo that contains half pkg versions in the same directory structure and indexes as the pkg_install structure... Time to rebuild everything from scratch I think - second time in a year.. I'm guessing my boss is going to tell me, use RPM, no wasting more time on it... only time will tell... you'll know the result if you see future posts and patches from me. Michelle -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 15:47:52 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A71587C; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 15:47:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x233.google.com (mail-we0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D40A1A88; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 15:47:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f179.google.com with SMTP id t60so7096785wes.24 for ; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 08:47:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=AxDVbuHqlRugWMMrVk3q/NOc29DA/5zPImOF07Tf58Q=; b=eQ9Lq7k7B18As5pPjxEHyCaR0F75LCOevNkKsY+MBQF5RSW7kP6EozfKcf/pHTeNR9 0xjbo6fXy1UN4CN+VFmpztcqEckS1Y13hGAL7DJaShkIwrQzFijnJJ9zO2JXIC8R+K9W uGcwtvG/GepEoKRgkDcyZFp4GWeZNbAxAcGLIeLrCYgaWTEmjSkxvDjDe3knzqmDtU6n Fo8egZhOBudN8lm/TXpcdeIQ9z1z/R+NppmMqhjXwQi4bNKSDLBm+tmIeSvGishdI9eK k4tGLxnezg/ZnA2ALYaY1D9JF63TjUqlQLNT57oKBNjiNj6tLiJEVjsHhUJ6FgmZYsmV 6mxw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.35.133 with SMTP id h5mr29159901wij.74.1409672869633; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 08:47:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.217.2.18 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 08:47:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5405E4F5.4090902@sorbs.net> References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> <54052DFA.4030808@freebsd.org> <54053372.6020009@my.hennepintech.edu> <5405890F.8080804@freebsd.org> <20140902125256.Horde.uv31ztwymThxUZ-OYPQoBw1@webmail.df.eu> <5405AE54.60809@sorbs.net> <1D2B4A91-E76C-43A0-BE75-D926357EF1AF@gmail.com> <5405E4F5.4090902@sorbs.net> Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 11:47:49 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool From: Brandon Allbery To: Michelle Sullivan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "pkg@freebsd.org" , "stable@freebsd.org" , "current@freebsd.org" , "ports@freebsd.org" , "mva@freebsd.org" , Garrett Cooper X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 15:47:52 -0000 On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > This is my only option - however, I suspect I'm already f**ked - my > build servers kicked off at 4am and the non pkg jails automatically > converted themselves to pkg.. the pkg jails obviously continued... > however I now have a repo that contains half pkg versions in the same > directory structure and indexes as the pkg_install structure... > So, the flip side of enterprise software management is that you probably should not be integrating a rolling release like ports into what is supposed to be a stable verified environment in the first place. *Especially* not via cron jobs with no supervision. At the very least, your jails should be working from a local ports tree (or packages via poudriere), with cherry-picking of locally tested patches. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 15:53:56 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3EEBE3F; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 15:53:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (hades.sorbs.net [67.231.146.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C22B11B9F; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 15:53:56 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0NBA00321709SK00@hades.sorbs.net>; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 08:57:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-id: <5405E810.8000400@sorbs.net> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 17:53:52 +0200 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: Brandon Allbery Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> <54052DFA.4030808@freebsd.org> <54053372.6020009@my.hennepintech.edu> <5405890F.8080804@freebsd.org> <20140902125256.Horde.uv31ztwymThxUZ-OYPQoBw1@webmail.df.eu> <5405AE54.60809@sorbs.net> <1D2B4A91-E76C-43A0-BE75-D926357EF1AF@gmail.com> <5405E4F5.4090902@sorbs.net> In-reply-to: Cc: "pkg@freebsd.org" , "stable@freebsd.org" , "current@freebsd.org" , "ports@freebsd.org" , "mva@freebsd.org" , Garrett Cooper X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 15:53:57 -0000 Brandon Allbery wrote: > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Michelle Sullivan > wrote: > > >> This is my only option - however, I suspect I'm already f**ked - my >> build servers kicked off at 4am and the non pkg jails automatically >> converted themselves to pkg.. the pkg jails obviously continued... >> however I now have a repo that contains half pkg versions in the same >> directory structure and indexes as the pkg_install structure... >> >> > > So, the flip side of enterprise software management is that you probably > should not be integrating a rolling release like ports into what is > supposed to be a stable verified environment in the first place. > *Especially* not via cron jobs with no supervision. At the very least, your > jails should be working from a local ports tree (or packages via > poudriere), with cherry-picking of locally tested patches. > > The roll until they get a stable base (using Jenkins as the controller) - they've been rolling since a patch to DBIx-SearchBuilder (that I created and submitted), which out came the DBD::Pg update to 3.3.0 and the subsequent blacklisting of it for RT 4.x and then the tcl breakage around mid August until 2 days ago... So yeah not that stupid. -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 18:43:21 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E66FFE0; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 18:43:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x22f.google.com (mail-la0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0DA9128C; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 18:43:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id s18so8247821lam.6 for ; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:43:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Fd0gq2+dULfSmbcoSocnopW21yp35yg8MkeeXzLLIq0=; b=OLH9GSiQle/F7q3H7SptrsVobghUHZeUevEjgAacRItq4j3Ih2lXdqNnyia1VVo/vf OusZwK5HeiS8YX8glLoYUhXtrlWplHq758JKqy5ANzQqE838CDEOofL/SEDcvnJwAgny f8k7vRqY/BNuH/QzU2+gwMUqPtcCwzm3J7UYMGlQtOhLdnYgNBaSUL9c6vltgfIulrdU 85/zwzwWp/py3qGVqMIiWhHUQjP/L64aQfKEgILZWVaEr2cxAYEnOK7oeJFva/bEixdb /9jxKIGny0mlP9as6eULcIK7vk6xCLbnmQQTyvToztZwEZ9KcZleU35B3x8c2yHWDGVf /YIg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.27.134 with SMTP id t6mr36696779lag.56.1409683398535; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:43:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.19.40 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 11:43:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 11:43:18 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: tmux backspace patch? From: Patrick To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, gahr@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 18:43:21 -0000 Hi, there: I was just wondering about the backspace patch for tmux. Since upgrading to tmux 1.9a (from 1.8) where this patch is unconditionally applied, my backspace key no longer works in the tmux command prompt (e.g. :). I had to remove the patch and manually rebuild to get it to work. I'm just wondering what purpose this patch serves? I don't really understand what this patch is doing, but I see from Google searching that I'm not the only one to have the exact same issue with this patch. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/2011-January/204523.html From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 19:07:20 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 540A9AAE for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 19:07:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x232.google.com (mail-wi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB5331526 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 19:07:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id r20so8510239wiv.17 for ; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 12:07:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; bh=biMZgogTEMYiSNzQeXDY6FwHyoLAtvAxu4TsH/QAUR8=; b=FIWlCz1t43j9XOCOzdWITPiaqCtUkjoEKNpPJ7KCG92PuCWQAI6iu8D92ez9G3OUN3 adpTV/WV3QCVkwLdpNtuRxw9j/v+2yubN+8OQ5GT11IncSavLMaUym8IKmwbsUS5/SRP KN7S43cfGG19Ool5YRyTJ2peZ/FDO7f/HpmftySIFijuMwnVc6AtXOlOpP91l5mRTx32 gLT1E5RXYD+f8Y16Y/2bzc2gwURGbuDZxXPUAXfTe1ytwpFBniL0a6N8zm1nmuJY3eHO 3sqYo1Z9jdqFO5yXJ25wVfZM7h+xNOiz1fKIhW6QnySoDEEYwJX4CMII9NvvPggXT1GS kwRA== X-Received: by 10.194.61.99 with SMTP id o3mr4934126wjr.103.1409684838144; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 12:07:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.dg ([197.83.193.253]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id s2sm11369866wjz.8.2014.09.02.12.07.16 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Sep 2014 12:07:17 -0700 (PDT) Sender: David Naylor From: David Naylor To: Thomas Mueller Subject: Re: wine (-devel) and i386-wine Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 21:07:09 +0300 Message-ID: <3491114.QmPtvet8Nz@dragon.dg> Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: KMail/4.10.5 (FreeBSD/9.3-STABLE; KDE/4.10.5; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <986583.59626.bm@smtp114.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> References: <986583.59626.bm@smtp114.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1849351.5zYlAIWtHI"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 19:07:20 -0000 --nextPart1849351.5zYlAIWtHI Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Hi Tom, On Monday, 1 September 2014 22:24:57 Thomas Mueller wrote: > I read something about two days on www.freshports.org about wine and > i386-wine that alters my plans. > > I tried to build i386-wine from i386 with the idea of using it both from > i386 and amd64, in the latter case mounting the i386 partition on > /compat/i386. > > But what I see makes that look not feasible. It is feasible to run the i386-wine ports from a 32bt environment - however it is not ideal. The port implements various hacks to get the package to work properly on an amd64 system that is simply not needed when running natively. > If I want to run wine from both i386 and amd64 (not at the same time), do I > need to make separate installations on separate partitions? In that case, > how do I avoid wasteful duplication in compiling? > > I am getting ready to rebuild/update FreeBSD-current and possibly > 10.0-STABLE from source, am planning to also make a new i386 installation > on a hard drive in a USB 2.0 and eSATA enclosure, using eSATA. > > I want to do this soon, at least for FreeBSD-current because, after running > svn up on FreeBSD src tree from NetBSD, I saw an update in > $SRCDIR/sys/dev/re/if_re.c and want to see if that works on my Ethernet. > > I also want the new NFS improvements. If you are going to have a /compat/i386 chroot then you could install (normal 32bit) wine there and with the correct scripts run wine from that chroot without needing i386-wine at all (you will need to set up the correct PATH, LD_32_LIBRARY_PATH and LD_32_LIBRARY_PATH_RPATH variables). Alternatively, you could install wine on 32-bit and i386-wine on 64-bit and use those respectively. I hope this clarifies. Regards --nextPart1849351.5zYlAIWtHI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQJ8BAABCgBmBQJUBhVgXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ5NDhFQzUxMUEyN0YwMzAyRTc5OUI1M0FB RDYzRkE4REQ2QjJEQTU1AAoJEK1j+o3WstpVYu4P/Aoo8ftVqqYj4J49ZOZ/mXtq wiZSuka0yO5qIhDfxgkvZTPzR2pwzaHRj0jUSz3UajpuhEFzstGU15TsqvOFR+qm 7VQimgNQ+oFlqz1hzfmUgagKiMRFp4b0VaiRQXSzB5FQgvB7rs6vH7ASe22Fyzwo lfhxAP6ZtF1PYJ3PvmKhZkw72WkTXVKMy7IwOWheC5OgIqlVu6WROnaaPSSWKF8B SgCcc6jNRy+u4De8sQq62HCYMAUPosGDfs/w3S+iOIGY7G7xpzkBOqfeksFvRqVx oeI0rI6Qh9Kc0i5jgGfB3cbyeX51loRzWGdriYTKYd8LBm4nMXrBFR3xsn7uWB// qQJBpWde84sntwxcs0abUjzg/8A8xPmskF4ZE+fthx6ub08FRoVGlOvXQeHiPMEE T4KlFvUbfVmXz4gsL6c4v5/QjGPfaUSClSSBjP+9DfDndWIxPaQrrSeW4Lx++GCj i5V1SEP4bqvY7R4FRuihzuxOuYvC/E1tyKjeNfftb66wptlijtBkJGJ52HqtAXUX 8EYXznHYJQqzrFATkDThVQwRLTifICJJSP7Dmcb6szZsxt1IyPLJs3NKAfN27HZi THaqeBnYbGG9iS3kCypse8Ysg+9oCYDCP0n0AFe7OWGNQTJKBlfI391VvN22dFcr AN6pAT8PMs7lpz1WKIxr =goz1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1849351.5zYlAIWtHI-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 20:53:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E62D210; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 20:53:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x233.google.com (mail-wi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9161A1241; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 20:53:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id q5so8638478wiv.0 for ; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 13:53:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=2uqFCWSfMViHPgW1whLQ8hLc+Hd0Xvz/QK2vZLoF8j0=; b=o5zDMxTszGaOHjD6a6Fsht1OYdDublw/qMmUlvLSbl9KBR05gtjngmbtWwHisbD4+C f7fjTs1lDvYsyuiH056cLwLKQfMcN5pIevDBlgmGG1fPYZ97UzXlX0Q716WFunEbVT5v FaHiTlBKoAZMy8Q86rr/5oflHU6aM4T+3Eb+J6y/6CqUZ8LIKspRdinXBhlTDHVWnyBe RCSLILbLs7Zo+LfOpiiLCieriUzJfY3kM9uWNIuNz//YM0VyEgkNI68uYV4vtuZ9GziN VuWPMFXI0tWEQy01ISPnYUemmMRmBXVQ1S6pUsCTjSSzukCmWFs1PRD4jcOq4qkE/XLD t1Vg== X-Received: by 10.180.182.67 with SMTP id ec3mr31054196wic.21.1409691179871; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 13:52:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cochard@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.90.2 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 13:52:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Olivier_Cochard=2DLabb=E9?= Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 22:52:39 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: OqZsFjHFM3m3a22r3ooNRq0qoow Message-ID: Subject: Re: tmux backspace patch? To: Patrick Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML , gahr@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 20:53:02 -0000 On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Patrick wrote: > Hi, there: > > > I was just wondering about the backspace patch for tmux. Since upgrading to > tmux 1.9a (from 1.8) where this patch is unconditionally applied, my > backspace key no longer works in the tmux command prompt (e.g. :). I > had to remove the patch and manually rebuild to get it to work. I'm just > wondering what purpose this patch serves? I don't really understand what > this patch is doing, but I see from Google searching that I'm not the only > one to have the exact same issue with this patch. > > Hi, I've the same regression: I need to use shift + backspace now. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 02:22:08 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCFCAC76 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 02:22:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pozo.com (pozo.com [50.197.129.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "pozo.com", Issuer "pozo.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C5F21745 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 02:22:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from T61p.pozo.com (t61p.pozo.com [192.168.0.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by pozo.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s832LwVw053629 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 19:21:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from null@pozo.com) Message-Id: <201409030221.s832LwVw053629@pozo.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 19:21:56 -0700 To: ports@freebsd.org From: Manfred Antar Subject: /head/sysutils/gnome-system-monitor/Makefile Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_MID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0, No X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on pozo.com X-pozocom-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pozocom-MailScanner-ID: s832LwVw053629 X-pozocom-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-pozocom-MailScanner-From: null@pozo.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 02:22:08 -0000 Log of /head/sysutils/gnome-system-monitor/Makefile Revision 367008 - (view) (download) (annotate) - [select for diffs] Modified Tue Sep 2 14:23:10 2014 UTC (11 hours, 43 minutes ago) by tijl Add missing library libgmodule-2.0 Reported by: antoine I think if you: Add missing library libgmodule-2.0 you must also add library libgthread-2.0 I couldn't get it to compile on i386 current without that Manfred ======================== || null@pozo.com || || || ======================== From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 03:09:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F630A1F for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 03:09:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from quine.pinyon.org (quine.pinyon.org [65.101.5.249]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 088231CDB for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 03:09:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by quine.pinyon.org (Postfix, from userid 122) id 07CAE1609BD; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 20:09:04 -0700 (MST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on quine.pinyon.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from feyerabend.n1.pinyon.org (feyerabend.n1.pinyon.org [10.0.10.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by quine.pinyon.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD02D160233 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 20:09:01 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <5406864D.7080604@pinyon.org> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 20:09:01 -0700 From: "Russell L. Carter" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: poudriere and DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES References: <54050C82.7090607@pinyon.org> <5405A45C.4040106@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <5405A45C.4040106@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 03:09:11 -0000 On 09/02/14 04:05, Alex Dupre wrote: > Russell L. Carter ha scritto: >> However, what I would like to learn is if poudriere >> is able to understand DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=YES, and if so, how to >> enable it. I'm not asking a political question here, just a technical >> one. If this is possible, how do I do it? > > NO_IGNORE= yes > Thanks! That worked. My family can stop hating on me now, as youtube lives. So, on FreeBSD-current, is there any other way besides chromium or firefox plus the dastardly nspluginwrapper'd flash plugin to view youtube, vimeo, etc? I am hoping that I have missed a better way. Supposedly there are new video protocols coming down the pipe, w/o the adobe baggage, or so I gather. Best, Russell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 07:32:30 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from ptrcrt.ch (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73437544; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 07:32:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 07:32:21 +0000 From: Pietro Cerutti To: Peter Olsson Subject: Re: tmux 1.9.a_2 split-window problem? Message-ID: <20140903073221.GA33953@ptrcrt.ch> Reply-To: gahr@FreeBSD.org References: <20140902191330.GA54044@pol-server.leissner.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FCuugMFkClbJLl1L" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140902191330.GA54044@pol-server.leissner.se> X-PGP-Key: fp="DA6D E106 A5B8 54B8 5DD8 6D49 ADD0 D38E A192 089E"; id="0xA192089E"; get=; get=; User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 07:32:30 -0000 --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2014-Sep-02, 21:13, Peter Olsson wrote: > Hello! Hi Peter, > Just wondering if you have any ideas about what I can try to fix the > problem below? > I have been using tmux for a couple of years, and absolutely love it. > But after upgrading my server from FreeBSD 8.4 to 10.0, and at the > same time upgrading tmux from 1.9.a_1 to 1.9.a_2, I can no longer do > unlimited split-window operations. The point where this happens > varies, from 2 to maybe 8 panes. I have no idea, sorry. I have tmux-1.9.a_2 on 11.0-CURRENT updated ~ end of July, and I am able to split a window to 20 or more panes easily. I'm forwarding this to a wider audience. I hope somebody has a clue.. > When I press my configured keys for split-window or split-window -h, > sometimes nothing at all happens, and sometimes the new pane comes up > but disappears immediately. (I guess the new pane comes up every time, > but sometimes disappears before I can see it.) >=20 > Pressing prefix : and then writing split-window or split-window -h > doesn't work either. >=20 > Sometimes I can change to another pane, and do a few more split-window > panes there. I can also open a new window and do a couple of > split-window there, until I get the problem there to. >=20 > My .tmux.conf is unaltered since it worked fine in FreeBSD 8.4. >=20 > I thought this might be a problem with FreeBSD 10.0, so I tried tmux > 1.9.a_2 in a server running 9.3. Same problem there, although the > point where the split stops working seems consistently a few panes > higher than in 10.0. >=20 > I thought this could be because of the new max value > :memorylocked=3D64K: in the default group in login.conf, since that > value was unlimited in 8.4 but is 64K in both 10.0 and 9.3. So I > changed it back to unlimited and ran cap_mkdb /etc/login.conf, but > that didn't solve the problem. >=20 > I also tried running tmux as root, with the same .tmux.conf as my > regular user, but root has the same problem. >=20 > One really interesting thing is that I have a couple of scripts that > start several (up to 25) tmux panes in one tmux window at once at > startup, and these scripts still work. Although when I press ctrl-d > (with set sync active so all the panes should close), the graphics of > the terminal hangs on some of the panes, which it never did in FreeBSD > 8.4. >=20 > Thanks! >=20 > --=20 > Peter Olsson --=20 Pietro Cerutti The FreeBSD Project gahr@FreeBSD.org PGP Public Key: http://gahr.ch/pgp --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUBsQFXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXREQTZERTEwNkE1Qjg1NEI4NUREODZENDlB REQwRDM4RUExOTIwODlFAAoJEK3Q046hkgiesfEP/R0yu3tUAfhiAElCsu0zYJlD U3R7nbQRUhtUR2ixq6CBItqAluhWDF/ARtk+i3Wp7gwEvXROivZxixsMKW4/zKld hFObANp3KQUCwbNh2w42HyjyRffcok1fYy0rw/bY7z4giiotHXzXqeh5EFeTU4Op wqat6kY/QFbaZb/K6tb7m0ucvCmMd+msOFFe6ZeuwfKNxHi0zT5ivEzgF8Xkgqs/ A5VjBgFJpuhLX9qgbgQiKjmXwBmi1lHcC/6A8cV+dUzp+4Og76n6+nUcbg61MRl1 IUu1Hg8Vk4eYhcMHJsvaumBat1j96WAA5ng3ov8o4PBmJzb/XffMIR5nxj8KMp/g wlUPy/rFS23pdjXJnu/Iq5Bzmfao9eSojshGv4cFNG3MFkZk494UkksEQuOQr7Ti 2k4qN5PTYuLGAmlyy9AhZ1ZWW1czj1PRPNALp53duuNBlnFq3acEab+TkHuyWBE6 WNu37o4LO8MFLn9Aq/rFUd21LyCAtbsG65y05wGFF0bAF58h6PR0LON7JGWh4O5n vflfMVfSvnVkR+FdGh8A5fz0IqskgL9zNh8IEuNBAlpGA/fXAYxZzV7JxI3nVuQ7 BUJQRcNK5tNsX91401Rwf7dsv3Q+PC9XD8kcFNLPVTwfRLf/7nv/OokB35fXcXwq BRwj7PIEnTsNkXzBWUd8 =BV50 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 08:25:44 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BD119E1 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 08:25:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x22d.google.com (mail-we0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6B031079 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 08:25:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id t60so8246071wes.18 for ; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 01:25:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:user-agent; bh=4jie32p5CJ/S9pOZQ81kcL5zcbwGblM5QUZvfE3s5WA=; b=Fz6saXFW7Oo488MhauFxXxKwbBMlWISxnIzs5OdsCGGyywUB/YhlswfSmRBP+KcGYs lBhWP3y5AGnoNjLXXfVgp7YGz0aWw8ojRrs0qepGNxHwWftOdNTK1461LZcep3TtjGzs Il23yjewzsteui+zO+TxPZbuz2KGEuXOaeFuaH1UqCWDHyUo+3BbJQYQJhlnKErTM2wj 21qzQE9HEFnUN011IIU7eDfTielQuxQULmeQyTf2PoeQli4/4ukUDLjWKwzhVzoN+0fF 9yr9GHKvVRgceT+NRBSOlpWWlCJufnapK9gaRQlVcbP53PjePn5FE347Clesb/x99ZdS OjYg== X-Received: by 10.180.210.201 with SMTP id mw9mr7651085wic.35.1409732742022; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 01:25:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id cy10sm14462781wjb.21.2014.09.03.01.25.40 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Sep 2014 01:25:41 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:25:39 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life Message-ID: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2hMgfIw2X+zgXrFs" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 08:25:44 -0000 --2hMgfIw2X+zgXrFs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi all, On of the most borring thing IMHO in the plist maintainance is all the directories. I have been working on some evolutions I want to share and discuss before making them official. First you have to know that since pkg 1.3 @dirrm and @dirrmtry are equivalent. Evolutions: 1/ stop prepending directories in plist with @dir*: let pkg discover the path correspond to a directory and handle it as such (easy) 2/ make pkg automatically remove directories under PREFIX without the need of adding them in plist, such as only empty directories and directories not under PREFIX will have to be listed. Of course pkg will not try to remove directories owned by another package. To achieve the point 2 that will mean we will stop using the mtree inside packages and create a "hier" package that will have the default hierarchy and every package but pkg will depend on this hier package (except if PREFIX != LOCALBASE) 2 bonus of this approach: - it will speed up pkg operation by avoiding to have to extract the mtree for each package installation - it will simplify a lot check-plist Any opinion here? regards, Bapt --2hMgfIw2X+zgXrFs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlQG0IIACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzmLACfbWIvRQC/qqCbzsafzBupyv9M JXYAniTA+xdmeEkm5dSHjNiBm/GET3gf =7FZq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2hMgfIw2X+zgXrFs-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 09:09:48 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 748AD1CE for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 09:09:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3D1D179D for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 09:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com (no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8399fEr056869 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:09:41 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=freebsd.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk s8399fEr056869 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/s8399fEr056869; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none; dkim-atps=neutral X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged) claimed to be ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com Message-ID: <5406DACD.3080601@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 10:09:33 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Cjk6hWHkK1feCjuXj8ibNRAKtxQTaDpac" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 09:09:48 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --Cjk6hWHkK1feCjuXj8ibNRAKtxQTaDpac Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09/03/14 09:25, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > On of the most borring thing IMHO in the plist maintainance is all the > directories. >=20 > I have been working on some evolutions I want to share and discuss befo= re making > them official. >=20 > First you have to know that since pkg 1.3 @dirrm and @dirrmtry are equi= valent. >=20 > Evolutions: > 1/ stop prepending directories in plist with @dir*: let pkg discover th= e path > correspond to a directory and handle it as such (easy) Presumably if you need an empty directory, just add it to the plist. > 2/ make pkg automatically remove directories under PREFIX without the n= eed of > adding them in plist, such as only empty directories and directories no= t under > PREFIX will have to be listed. Of course pkg will not try to remove dir= ectories > owned by another package. There should be some concept of shared use directories, so eg. if package foo installs /usr/local/foobar/foo and then later package bar installs /usr/local/foobar/bar. Should you then delete package foo, package bar should inherit ownership of /usr/local/foobar/ For a real example of this consider eg. p5-DBD-Pg and p5-DBD-Sqlite. Probably we can just say directory /usr/local/foobar belongs to both packages foo and bar, and it only gets deleted when the last owner is removed and if it is empty. Needs more thought though. What happens if two packages disagree about ownership and permissions on a common directory? I guess that should just be treated like a conflicting file, and block installation of the second package. > To achieve the point 2 that will mean we will stop using the mtree insi= de > packages and create a "hier" package that will have the default hierarc= hy and > every package but pkg will depend on this hier package (except if PREFI= X !=3D > LOCALBASE) And if you follow the shared ownership idea to its logical conclusion, /usr/local/bin, /usr/local/man and /usr/local/share end up with shared ownership by almost every package you have installed. Would you actually need to have a hier package at all? Although having one would still be a good idea IMHO. > 2 bonus of this approach: > - it will speed up pkg operation by avoiding to have to extract the mtr= ee for > each package installation > - it will simplify a lot check-plist >=20 > Any opinion here? Having both mtree and the package manifest both providing very similar functionality is somewhat redundant. Cheers, Matthew --Cjk6hWHkK1feCjuXj8ibNRAKtxQTaDpac Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUBtrVXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnmVoP/07JVzg4OXReQWoahEMZcPwf uI3uNtRr84hQplxKtMdSgdrXB0BfCazlb3gJPVwWRqoCqgNUqFngs6WIbikyQDH8 xZl0F6RqybC5/B2iwCo42voZaSJmzA8OyL9ziiHVt3o0bTfYxI6rV4ZsXsJ0oM8P wKu7cJ33V0TL2kuvI/6QnNYy3psrQtXccWbB4ec8lOPZXyBY0476/oEah7RAg5M+ fBdME/kB0k910jshwFhouwri5ejDyKGOjHILv1lAiDM/KumMzU09AsvQZLfTtU1B n+1CqyasMNZmaXMYaqI6lG1NKSrDF9BnH74hisqooUSJ9mKwYZo5mS0yGQTHfFJQ KDFReHL5g1O4oX0y4tz9v8svUmj/UyS1hV28jhXebRQ8v0+VAF3tv0MUAtXMPenE b13NgUiwRZ21UfYX/FotKmzXmwkbIpDAYfclty0WCPai2TAmqM8McrxcwuLo3bKK R1VNtYk4rYAIxX/uYUjpfOoFy8NzdV1xuMVLHMxghVUdLytOPjX15DBpWgcrKdxl q1Jmu2zOO0KlaQ2V5ws6KVMQf+3O9eBDCiSMJjQiqGG1XZVpN3HHLU35u8+/FumU SdywGOLf8TuZhLq15UCAQMRVmJcYOQK9Q0fI/SoKlxeKi9924WdYnklhlCBPk3AH ez7GN9fODX4JHgKVxgyL =NKDQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Cjk6hWHkK1feCjuXj8ibNRAKtxQTaDpac-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 09:23:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFF1A561; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 09:23:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x233.google.com (mail-wg0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EB7F1953; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 09:23:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id l18so8048239wgh.34 for ; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 02:23:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=0PA5XENVTfNo+aNIFMQeOzhGt/6X0Y5FOjBIuUT5nNk=; b=gd6d8ficmlT9fz9UBqz0dlIzdBNOGikxFbyBVzgBaagY8walgQVf/lvXXX8/ANOSAU jRiPPtpMVA+a6mfzAb1MZUd87qC2NL3DwE72Na+VXH7AjUW3dayuOCXL9NgYV0Ynxv97 8shbY6JT9SR9vhFUC5i9NpVivMNLdyVkSNcf8gVXVXvc2dfXQl0lwLIHWfgwpXqBjbsI jlz3B/hr5XjoZuFClSg3n8eXa/AoGk9V2uF+sOkTHz10vg/xUtDv0G4VMPPEFx8e+nSf Fkco/JkmMSWhXL7nSK/apxXSFavmD6VmBnxiooOv6RnvTQodLnYXhKLf1lnnuJ7Dqg2r IF0Q== X-Received: by 10.195.17.170 with SMTP id gf10mr1662358wjd.111.1409736215292; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 02:23:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id lu12sm3485106wic.4.2014.09.03.02.23.33 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Sep 2014 02:23:34 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 11:23:32 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Matthew Seaman Subject: Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life Message-ID: <20140903092332.GF63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <5406DACD.3080601@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aZoGpuMECXJckB41" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5406DACD.3080601@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 09:23:38 -0000 --aZoGpuMECXJckB41 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 10:09:33AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 09/03/14 09:25, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > Hi all, > >=20 > > On of the most borring thing IMHO in the plist maintainance is all the > > directories. > >=20 > > I have been working on some evolutions I want to share and discuss befo= re making > > them official. > >=20 > > First you have to know that since pkg 1.3 @dirrm and @dirrmtry are equi= valent. > >=20 > > Evolutions: > > 1/ stop prepending directories in plist with @dir*: let pkg discover th= e path > > correspond to a directory and handle it as such (easy) >=20 > Presumably if you need an empty directory, just add it to the plist. Yup >=20 > > 2/ make pkg automatically remove directories under PREFIX without the n= eed of > > adding them in plist, such as only empty directories and directories no= t under > > PREFIX will have to be listed. Of course pkg will not try to remove dir= ectories > > owned by another package. >=20 > There should be some concept of shared use directories, so eg. if > package foo installs /usr/local/foobar/foo and then later package bar > installs /usr/local/foobar/bar. Should you then delete package foo, > package bar should inherit ownership of /usr/local/foobar/ >=20 > For a real example of this consider eg. p5-DBD-Pg and p5-DBD-Sqlite. >=20 > Probably we can just say directory /usr/local/foobar belongs to both > packages foo and bar, and it only gets deleted when the last owner is > removed and if it is empty. That is what I was trying to explain :) >=20 > Needs more thought though. What happens if two packages disagree about > ownership and permissions on a common directory? I guess that should > just be treated like a conflicting file, and block installation of the > second package. Right now we have no way to handle this in pkg(8) but that could be added l= ater >=20 > > To achieve the point 2 that will mean we will stop using the mtree insi= de > > packages and create a "hier" package that will have the default hierarc= hy and > > every package but pkg will depend on this hier package (except if PREFI= X !=3D > > LOCALBASE) >=20 > And if you follow the shared ownership idea to its logical conclusion, > /usr/local/bin, /usr/local/man and /usr/local/share end up with shared > ownership by almost every package you have installed. Would you > actually need to have a hier package at all? Although having one would > still be a good idea IMHO. hier also defined /usr/local/etc/libmap.d or /usr/local/etc/rc.conf.d :) >=20 > > 2 bonus of this approach: > > - it will speed up pkg operation by avoiding to have to extract the mtr= ee for > > each package installation > > - it will simplify a lot check-plist > >=20 > > Any opinion here? >=20 > Having both mtree and the package manifest both providing very similar > functionality is somewhat redundant. The mtree will be not packaged at all anymore. regards, Bapt --aZoGpuMECXJckB41 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlQG3hQACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzovQCdELYZ5B8JVe3jllql12/etjRE XpcAn14WzXNtiys23+DntZRYmC67tdDS =hmqj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --aZoGpuMECXJckB41-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 09:24:59 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87F30611; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 09:24:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from qat.redports.org (qat.redports.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6420::233:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 563941964; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 09:24:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redports.org; s=04012012; h=Sender:Message-Id:To:Subject:Reply-To:Date:To:Cc:From:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=9eKrR3Xie8znFBfMZ23cZswRuUrWNCRyrOzBv3XT8SA=; b=0J68ZucEJCHMPCiddUyjtKAJ1uCtjswycBIMFlKni2/HkRN0pr/bUlVRNdxXT3G1lwYR+8KQOOmT/0Zteg0K1U5Z9RFO3hg6Wry/REuBrl14EvJ3BPWDB+09pr+oSbpGhAsYRQ6iSdPbep5ur3H3sD1Q22ikCm809VNo+i7z/oA=; Received: from www by qat.redports.org with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1XP6oD-000Ozb-T4; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 09:24:57 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Ports-QAT" X-Trac-Version: 1.0.1 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 1.0.1, by Edgewall Software To: adamw@FreeBSD.org X-Trac-Project: redports Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 09:24:57 -0000 Reply-To: qat@redports.org X-URL: https://qat.redports.org/ Subject: [QAT] 366936: 4x leftovers To: adamw@FreeBSD.org X-Trac-Build-URL: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/20140901192800-63814 X-Trac-Build-ID: 20140901192800-63814 Message-Id: Sender: World Wide Web Owner Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, decke@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 09:24:59 -0000 The doxygen build was failing on 8 and 9 for non-obvious reasons. As a stopgap (and as a favour to anyone building from ports ;-), change the DOCS option to DOXYGEN, and default it to off. THere are still some stage-qa issues but it should build and package on all platforms now. Approved by: joerg (maintainer) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Build ID: 20140901192800-63814 Job owner: adamw@FreeBSD.org Buildtime: 38 hours Enddate: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 09:24:54 GMT Revision: 366936 Repository: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=366936 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Port: devel/avr-libc 1.8.1_1,1 Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~adamw@FreeBSD.org/20140901192800-63814-407954/avr-libc-1.8.1_1,1.log Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~adamw@FreeBSD.org/20140901192800-63814-407955/avr-libc-1.8.1_1,1.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~adamw@FreeBSD.org/20140901192800-63814-407956/avr-libc-1.8.1_1,1.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~adamw@FreeBSD.org/20140901192800-63814-407957/avr-libc-1.8.1_1,1.log -- Buildarchive URL: redports From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 09:43:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4DC0AF7 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 09:43:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm27-vm5.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm27-vm5.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.63.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EE631B5A for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 09:43:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bellsouth.net; s=s1024; t=1409737008; bh=8ippHEDjF0ddgu9f3MowzAmMY/w4u9WMe5t0MO7lzk8=; h=Received:Received:Received:DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:Message-ID:Date:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:From:To:CC:Subject:References; b=Ta9aQR8s58uhpp60sF6PCgG13QTrtzkETV9QZ2YSGJsiwpRAnXgG00Qvu6m4GyEQvYGeYei4qHtDviyrI+wlvyJRYShhDZ9FbZjYLk7JQy5ctWK/4RZmQCq6NqZ9/pKXHOEVh3EYLxB3qkH+QQ9prCalpCe0ZyLIp58NsdzyxB4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=bellsouth.net; b=yIU6A0YPySFe1jrBB7Xh0wRlwZPlISEUFau8tfbtuPSc7HD+FOZsABOCBtal9YF7n6iMjYvjpvrgBxBiMQW2rq3/u8IY6JvSHDp47Skd4cOXHLrMvx/DK/UvfU/aG2j6qhQerhejLx+WP7zy1RuYmtcxN0oFFK9X5vSSaKZXbG4=; Received: from [216.39.60.168] by nm27.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Sep 2014 09:36:48 -0000 Received: from [67.195.23.148] by tm4.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Sep 2014 09:36:48 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp120.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Sep 2014 09:36:48 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bellsouth.net; s=s1024; t=1409737008; bh=8ippHEDjF0ddgu9f3MowzAmMY/w4u9WMe5t0MO7lzk8=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:Message-ID:Date:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:From:To:CC:Subject:References; b=aBPhJSwHa52iOn9u9s7ULrOoRKi/UCeTV1Z/9/u/NOP8fkRPIZWlDvRHF4qhmWfO2N+aMtn1ryjaRm8lScvfaa3du+FZPNwppz8oTX0sZuv/dBqRJdd8Bi7bqEgNNQziuB4JIMzgFJT7V/0VA1m0LMHILr1MDX5wGWeKX8Tc/eY= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 699263.30928.bm@smtp120.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com Message-ID: <699263.30928.bm@smtp120.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 09:36:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: 5M94.xYVM1nBbSDNBAz5Q2JM2CvPRh0A21RIpHUoMOVDCNb bwrdLLKu0iYHqD4d3xK5.Ne4pjVfRJ0nNOPD2W7vDqtwA3PmYT2yFQkjs3D_ TwpMzy2TKCRIFpYq1I.fhtGW5z8u.tHcGKRMPmqbFmhnWeH3gm6qmJztuFwA IR94IieUieEBXCcgwxL7h4f7yyBfkv3BYMuZYwrKonT2njysXRmTgNoA2ruY OgV.h9XfbIRJhmKa04_Ovx5PXChqOeRKhxMZjZHTlvYs2KRXcNZzBR8J6ZFY 2_0_qUrNrEwCuQZifErVW9t9frxOfYTVo6hDD4dpGDpq4GRP5EAM3e0aBPv2 JEH59lj_rgX6CT9N3tSpWd_ShABFxm4Y0iGL641er7gcV8RPn0Q7Pi2Y6jQL KQ563iQNgIUTfoP0aP2UFh4MQxvCnmjZzSfIn5_1tdpUyN0X2urAtaSviBXp ghUUQuc_XLVtpYhhe9Od.B8AYBcKboiGrGjcooMmtoxxIE7RFUANOohtw4BG a6ryozBS0LnplBRDK8xcRNBc_LPR0r1nf.Cg2ac4jBQgrj1VRyuovrOlibg- - X-Yahoo-SMTP: Kz_aW1.swBBYof3zAD7.RWzXz9ZAQVDMml1VADsbgPT4Kq79LC0- From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wine (-devel) and i386-wine References: <986583.59626.bm@smtp114.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <3491114.QmPtvet8Nz@dragon.dg> Cc: David Naylor X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 09:43:39 -0000 from David Naylor (excerpt): > If you are going to have a /compat/i386 chroot then you could install (normal > 32bit) wine there and with the correct scripts run wine from that chroot > without needing i386-wine at all (you will need to set up the correct PATH, > LD_32_LIBRARY_PATH and LD_32_LIBRARY_PATH_RPATH variables). > Alternatively, you could install wine on 32-bit and i386-wine on 64-bit and > use those respectively. > I hope this clarifies. That helps! I think I tried to install i386-wine, but now I will try with plain wine, or wine-devel. This would be on a separate partition so as to be able to run independently of amd64 installation. Then for amd64, I could mount this partition on /compat/i386 and would have to set up the scripts to run wine from that chroot. I had this problem on a previous installation, remember asking questions. That was on a hard drive that went bad (amd64 installation part), and while I recovered most user data, wine configuration and also i3 window manager configuration were lost. I believe if you build i386-wine only to run on amd64, you don't need Xorg for i386, but in my situation, I will need Xorg for both amd64 and i386. Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 10:01:49 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A816475; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:01:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay003.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay003.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A64281D6F; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:01:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlsGANblBlRR8Z/O/2dsb2JhbABagw2BIArQGAGBDxd3hAMBAQQBOhwjBQsLDgoJJQ8qHgYTGYghDAG9LQEXj00HhEwFjx2NPpUfg2M7L4JPAQEB Received: from 206.159-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.241.159.206]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 03 Sep 2014 12:01:45 +0200 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s83A1i1n006373; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 12:01:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 12:01:44 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans To: Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life Message-ID: <20140903120144.5bfc3fde@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 10:01:49 -0000 On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:25:39 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On of the most borring thing IMHO in the plist maintainance is all the > directories. > > I have been working on some evolutions I want to share and discuss before > making them official. > > First you have to know that since pkg 1.3 @dirrm and @dirrmtry are > equivalent. > > Evolutions: > 1/ stop prepending directories in plist with @dir*: let pkg discover > the path correspond to a directory and handle it as such (easy) Good. > 2/ make pkg automatically remove directories under PREFIX without the > need of adding them in plist, such as only empty directories and > directories not under PREFIX will have to be listed. Of course pkg will > not try to remove directories owned by another package. > > To achieve the point 2 that will mean we will stop using the mtree > inside packages and create a "hier" package that will have the default > hierarchy and every package but pkg will depend on this hier package > (except if PREFIX != LOCALBASE) I think you can avoid the hier package and thus the PREFIX != LOCALBASE problem. Assume there are no packages with empty directories, then pkg can always remove empty directories when deinstalling a package, because no files in the directory means no package requires it. You don't need a hier package in this case. You can add support for packages with empty directories in two ways: - Put a dummy file in the directory, e.g. .PKGNAME.keepme (simple to implement, but maybe some packages really need the directory to be empty or maybe they only expect a specific type of files) - Record something like .PKGNAME.keepme in the pkg db but don't actually create that file. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 10:07:58 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1330275F; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:07:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22c.google.com (mail-wi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 786891E55; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:07:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id n3so563487wiv.17 for ; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 03:07:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=9THdwxUmL4rKlGh/8urMWyzDigTVMYWb9D8OOVxz9LU=; b=QoJwAHsm+abpfPkgy0Sy+EJqa1aQixiTk6esCU5x/cOcxQCus92xSN/s8CdFwJ/TR3 LvJ8q+4Q/YAYOWDdmJ0cU3DzfBywm1somG1gPwfbaWZjylnnKNx/rSk7Xv9kaAwyXS9X g0SJHEHeK8PBg8c9EpStkY7zF1Httveqbyj6ItPU/IVmTRNFt7ft0loBFfwVR7qOG7Q0 4PHWQTDqYyiOu3rbFT3X2J24ld6xA0oHRIMwZK1nBqRJHpRoExcbLnXRh+whvFowooGu icAK6HplOyk7UM2FJ0PhQ8MtPib5E37Mw5FESvzmMV0iRzhrxg/LjseWwX962acO0MAj 2pSw== X-Received: by 10.194.87.102 with SMTP id w6mr44674457wjz.24.1409738875764; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 03:07:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id uk7sm14895888wjc.34.2014.09.03.03.07.53 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Sep 2014 03:07:53 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 12:07:51 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Tijl Coosemans Subject: Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life Message-ID: <20140903100751.GG63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903120144.5bfc3fde@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6BvahUXLYAruDZOj" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140903120144.5bfc3fde@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 10:07:58 -0000 --6BvahUXLYAruDZOj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 12:01:44PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:25:39 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin w= rote: > > On of the most borring thing IMHO in the plist maintainance is all the > > directories. > >=20 > > I have been working on some evolutions I want to share and discuss befo= re > > making them official. > >=20 > > First you have to know that since pkg 1.3 @dirrm and @dirrmtry are > > equivalent. > >=20 > > Evolutions: > > 1/ stop prepending directories in plist with @dir*: let pkg discover > > the path correspond to a directory and handle it as such (easy) >=20 > Good. >=20 > > 2/ make pkg automatically remove directories under PREFIX without the > > need of adding them in plist, such as only empty directories and > > directories not under PREFIX will have to be listed. Of course pkg will > > not try to remove directories owned by another package. > >=20 > > To achieve the point 2 that will mean we will stop using the mtree > > inside packages and create a "hier" package that will have the default > > hierarchy and every package but pkg will depend on this hier package > > (except if PREFIX !=3D LOCALBASE) >=20 > I think you can avoid the hier package and thus the PREFIX !=3D LOCALBASE > problem. >=20 > Assume there are no packages with empty directories, then pkg can > always remove empty directories when deinstalling a package, because > no files in the directory means no package requires it. You don't need > a hier package in this case. >=20 > You can add support for packages with empty directories in two ways: > - Put a dummy file in the directory, e.g. .PKGNAME.keepme > (simple to implement, but maybe some packages really need the > directory to be empty or maybe they only expect a specific type of > files) > - Record something like .PKGNAME.keepme in the pkg db but don't > actually create that file. We do already support empty directories natively we do not need the .keep whatever and this works pretty well :) if a line in the plist is a directory (or @dirrm* ) then the directory is considered as owned by the package and always created My only problem is to still provide the default grobal hier in provided by BSD.local.dist (like etc/rc.conf.d etc/libmap.d etc) that said we have actu= ally only 4 empty directories all documented in the respective manpages from base where they are used, so yes probably I can just ignore the mtree at all Which makes the feature easy to implement then. In anycase I will limit auto removal to PREFIX (the one supplied when creat= ing the package) because base has its own mtree and I do not want to delete any empty directory from base at least until base is package itself. regards, Bapt --6BvahUXLYAruDZOj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlQG6HcACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ex2jACgj74RVUo3ZcP+z9TT7Eorb2Sr mIoAn2HJQNoz1wMWDGhtWs0uJHWXdmqc =WBqD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6BvahUXLYAruDZOj-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 10:34:54 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B472BE2 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:34:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2F2B11A0 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:34:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com (no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s83AYk8x058700 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 11:34:46 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=infracaninophile.co.uk DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk s83AYk8x058700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1409740486; bh=fKNx3r7nX3mMnrV0cNgHhngg9nF6Y73bv9CQK4iq9DE=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; z=Date:=20Wed,=2003=20Sep=202014=2011:34:45=20+0100|From:=20Matthew =20Seaman=20|To:=20freebsd-ports@ freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20[BRAINSTORMING]=20simplifying=20maint ainer's=20life|References:=20<20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoil ebsd.net>=20<20140903120144.5bfc3fde@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>= 20<20140903100751.GG63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>|In-Reply-To:=20<2 0140903100751.GG63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>; b=yT/nzbRbx0AIsSkVIwvr4u2Y3baTtaFKPyXLv38e10GKN6xBbTbDDO1mL8Mv3gbt9 T6S/2RFEvnn2AqB6QWomCB3Gh8PGjPh6FN2ZVkSWQZZk/aU9LEp8nJzrePyXlT6MPh wdfRJMO4PezXLsUFtakH184DVmDHpx9VClFnG4VA= X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged) claimed to be ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com Message-ID: <5406EEC5.1040708@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 11:34:45 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903120144.5bfc3fde@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140903100751.GG63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20140903100751.GG63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BLxjOTe6BDODesmQs19LGTMtfgulnxxRg" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RDNS_NONE,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 10:34:54 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --BLxjOTe6BDODesmQs19LGTMtfgulnxxRg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09/03/14 11:07, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > In anycase I will limit auto removal to PREFIX (the one supplied when c= reating > the package) because base has its own mtree and I do not want to delete= any > empty directory from base at least until base is package itself. What about stuff ports create under /var ? Cheers, Matthew --BLxjOTe6BDODesmQs19LGTMtfgulnxxRg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUBu7GXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTn6JsP/AjdUBOl3skW3cd33Q2JL9ob tDzRXL4v5k5Rz1Xbh9hPQIj2u7YLSWiUF6qEmif4e+sz2IJGCD3MBdZZzXxQx9/V 9JyfBzDHkYYgRj/NJQlkbBnEI2smpwON9QRCFSRKj7g2ITfRnCFNg4KNS7lHqGcv 9OBmKxTnTqd14b/T5L3qAXZSErgOZoKuUdWwQ5RfcVKbrmquy+zT5ZjuAzV8FLS+ 2o9e2N/Y0dym44LgSN9B4g79HiS1N8ORsN+GBkmfxi6bK3cALQ7khhodHhUwD/3m kdRPiAqIdtVxos8BIoEnZUay4Phifxx6xRa6q2+aM5EjdAkQSOIFVAN/jeDCRYjV 8KOvi0qPnTq+rgrolHw1VJ9bLLVpm1koMU2V/wNdHG8gvkc1wHMax9VRuBrf2+JC hKvIuflqbXvng6lnNy5xVZ5hTwCB0IvVY3Nl3fGR3t1u0rwFGw7CzlgOsLAMOKS1 pZoWGz0F8rmEJIpboIEMTqT0Em014IM9AJGyQ9dh8Zb+yFhqggXEivRBpRHHv93j uTw5LSrS+wQ4QUIM5W/nWyhwoQDRX3KwSJIUCyN/bqOElFPYBApCPBfJ0gFaOSzf qivydokiNP1mn0PRff/msA0FZXlWD/fZJ8Rb2N49k0V9WLJav5x9HOA2o2Z56lob tSY5ksANIrSV1Y2+Cbnc =3YeP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BLxjOTe6BDODesmQs19LGTMtfgulnxxRg-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 10:37:06 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7995CA6 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:37:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x234.google.com (mail-we0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A26C11E8 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:37:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f180.google.com with SMTP id w61so8354053wes.11 for ; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 03:37:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=SC1WdRPvsmTdiRPLudtF1ajrIVXec4gfKpioYsaXZ1s=; b=cDqgO7qKt61BkDXL0jnEZO4iSELHuyR5x4yU2+7ijqIO/iI2S7/pr2/+3pNiuof84L mVkLPTcG0GGHz3SYe61iE32leXoqyNNPIkHE93XGaV96S9+N4DAvxmfDt7B1AQvy7MDy 8pYFLDsUIyi/JS5L4H38WQJzLXamki7dibgFldd8oOIPErWfk3ZNoyoKqVVUecotJNbN CuPNq/yoO27urYZD5li6naQFqzjvO7fL282Re/UDlbR1TA4yCNHduPRbo05keL4LjA4v G+bn3mQ/PM8mQSHvBrFWqZeII9waGXqIO7ZF0CkCQ6y3QCHqyDvlAuIH3KGGjDyDDinO ufnQ== X-Received: by 10.181.13.116 with SMTP id ex20mr34823906wid.31.1409740624407; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 03:37:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id cj7sm15025118wjc.37.2014.09.03.03.37.01 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Sep 2014 03:37:02 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 12:37:00 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Matthew Seaman Subject: Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life Message-ID: <20140903103700.GH63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903120144.5bfc3fde@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140903100751.GG63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <5406EEC5.1040708@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cfJ13FhsvNR/yOpm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5406EEC5.1040708@infracaninophile.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 10:37:06 -0000 --cfJ13FhsvNR/yOpm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 11:34:45AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 09/03/14 11:07, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > In anycase I will limit auto removal to PREFIX (the one supplied when c= reating > > the package) because base has its own mtree and I do not want to delete= any > > empty directory from base at least until base is package itself. >=20 > What about stuff ports create under /var ? >=20 They will continue to have to specify directly: /var/run/stuff/mine/ /var/run/stuff/ regards, Bapt --cfJ13FhsvNR/yOpm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlQG70wACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ez8IQCgtL0jMyZEAKmJanpK2rc7oT3q yhQAn29p6502MM2S3mkLeLGqIuGaF91C =fQ6G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cfJ13FhsvNR/yOpm-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 10:42:18 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 709A4FA3 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:42:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C38612CF for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:42:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s83AgICW088730 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:42:18 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id s83AgIIa088729; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:42:18 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201409031042.s83AgIIa088729@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:42:18 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 10:42:18 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ emulators/linux_base-gentoo-stage3 | 20140812 | 20140902 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ emulators/linux_dist-gentoo-stage3 | 20140812 | 20140902 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 11:15:14 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0842755 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 11:15:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm46.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm46.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.120.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7026E179E for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 11:15:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] by nm46.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Sep 2014 11:15:13 -0000 Received: from [98.138.101.131] by nm46.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Sep 2014 11:12:26 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.152] by tm19.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Sep 2014 11:12:26 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.199] by tm9.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Sep 2014 11:12:26 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1008.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Sep 2014 11:12:26 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-4 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 314918.92592.bm@omp1008.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 29663 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Sep 2014 11:12:26 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.nz; s=s1024; t=1409742746; bh=j0+cSDBx1FvCQJmjtFhOL4E5zFNIMJ8mqoU2OmK8jjw=; h=References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=wnvKoDNyxB7wFo4nGkeCZb7FM6OQhafu3hdPtW4ds0UCKk6vrF1+iR8Cuc6iEjxQyx3f0ACTOM8Au7UDvT/kiREdM2hcyQaOCuWkPjvJLNrYuJ2kjBwUwUYgNQB6s/uasmphZYxnyccA9/D6nJY7LeLDvE4e/zbouvfcdpdgr8s= X-YMail-OSG: Va9Y0u8VM1kBXLseNtAVao1Mdne3j2tAxZLXhOg7SGXpOjj ld0.MAV3d9K.U7MOI6GmPUtVcaIq4QLTsJzJUrf6eSSTr2DZS8EIXpWjLIo_ vb0wUz1E0gYU5cMOFa6PWcra5r22enVCu.gTc9Vp5FQtslokMHRgNSaE2HOS ucx91q6mB85rYwH9uQBCN4_fNb99.cCuqObzZ1zp0yCxm3QrZjMyZgNYUTf0 ktiTYCUbEbvX914MOOJ.w.PcyqTiSaCVMUU3qoM63dSEpYFWEcqsBpek3hAv 3xm5mdfdrzTTBsaKngFX8AIUid_cVQFXUohVNV3qcJK_4YnTgN30KWbDLw_w 5lsrfKN9fCTXQvhsNCONoXQBCXWZsRTibjRmV1TA8hdGVjbKxZ4Wm2Qd.GNp RPPV3vK6suMlVH1Bxc47t80JwP0Mzeml_MnEiMsR2New1MdZCwmIpqw7rDTJ fW4GmA5BQVDLGl0xvPmmbXpfcH92aSm0jP7xO0h6ljEtjOF1JxrQK0vqL5I9 tAYF04nQGT9w5DxD108.mInAWpwJ83mjn9sKdMrATnYPf2J7LBMlpgK1Skkn 1jpPZO7IIc4_y4tWbWC2q.VZiKFCTtI7KvORDXSJkVjRCjuzQIOZMvY37Rv_ fx5Umrw-- Received: from [80.113.1.11] by web141004.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 04:12:26 PDT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, SGksCgpJIHRyaWVkIGJ1aWxkaW5nIHlvdXIgcG9ydCwgYnV0IGl0IGZhaWxlZCA6CgpDb3B5aW5nIGxpYnhtbDJfcHl0aG9uLmVnZy1pbmZvIHRvIC9wb3J0cy90ZXh0cHJvYy9weS1saWJ4bWwyL3dvcmsvc3RhZ2UvdXNyL2xvY2FsL2xpYi9weXRob24yLjcvc2l0ZS1wYWNrYWdlcy9saWJ4bWwyX3B5dGhvbi0yLjkuMS1weTIuNy5lZ2ctaW5mbwpydW5uaW5nIGluc3RhbGxfc2NyaXB0cwp3cml0aW5nIGxpc3Qgb2YgaW5zdGFsbGVkIGZpbGVzIHRvICcvcG9ydHMvdGV4dHByb2MvcHktbGlieG1sMi93b3JrLy4BMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.203.696 References: Message-ID: <1409742746.7914.YahooMailNeo@web141004.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 04:12:26 -0700 From: Ewout Reply-To: Ewout Subject: FreeBSD Port: py27-libxml2-2.9.1 To: "gnome@FreeBSD.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" , "bland@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 11:15:14 -0000 Hi,=0A=0AI tried building your port, but it failed :=0A=0ACopying libxml2_p= ython.egg-info to /ports/textproc/py-libxml2/work/stage/usr/local/lib/pytho= n2.7/site-packages/libxml2_python-2.9.1-py2.7.egg-info=0Arunning install_sc= ripts=0Awriting list of installed files to '/ports/textproc/py-libxml2/work= /.PLIST.pymodtmp'=0A/usr/bin/strip: '/ports/textproc/py-libxml2/work/stage/= usr/local/lib/2.7/site-packages/libxml2mod.so': No such file=0A*** Error co= de 1=0A=0AStop.=0Amake[1]: stopped in /ports/textproc/py-libxml2=0A*** Erro= r code 1=0A=0A=0AI think the script for building it is wrong, there=0A is a= directory /ports/textproc/py-libxml2/work/stage/usr/local/lib/python2.7 bu= t not 2.7 .=0A=0APerhaps you could look at it ?=0A=0AThanks,=0A=0AEwout Bok= s From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 12:30:30 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0CEFEE; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 12:30:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay006.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay006.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458001F4F; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 12:30:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlsGAL8IB1RR8Z/O/2dsb2JhbABZgw2BIArQGAGBDxd3hAMBAQQBViMFCwsOCgklDyoeBhMZiCEMAb04AReOdlcHhEwFkzeEYoRClR+DYzsvgQeBSAEBAQ Received: from 206.159-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.241.159.206]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 03 Sep 2014 14:30:26 +0200 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s83CUPtV007083; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 14:30:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 14:30:17 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans To: Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life Message-ID: <20140903143017.372e42a4@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <20140903100751.GG63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903120144.5bfc3fde@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140903100751.GG63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/_nqFAbhvujdFgdhLSHEs2Tu"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 12:30:31 -0000 --Sig_/_nqFAbhvujdFgdhLSHEs2Tu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 12:07:51 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wro= te: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 12:01:44PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:25:39 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin = wrote: >>> 2/ make pkg automatically remove directories under PREFIX without the >>> need of adding them in plist, such as only empty directories and >>> directories not under PREFIX will have to be listed. Of course pkg will >>> not try to remove directories owned by another package. >>>=20 >>> To achieve the point 2 that will mean we will stop using the mtree >>> inside packages and create a "hier" package that will have the default >>> hierarchy and every package but pkg will depend on this hier package >>> (except if PREFIX !=3D LOCALBASE) >>=20 >> I think you can avoid the hier package and thus the PREFIX !=3D LOCALBASE >> problem. >>=20 >> Assume there are no packages with empty directories, then pkg can >> always remove empty directories when deinstalling a package, because >> no files in the directory means no package requires it. You don't need >> a hier package in this case. >>=20 >> You can add support for packages with empty directories in two ways: >> - Put a dummy file in the directory, e.g. .PKGNAME.keepme >> (simple to implement, but maybe some packages really need the >> directory to be empty or maybe they only expect a specific type of >> files) >> - Record something like .PKGNAME.keepme in the pkg db but don't >> actually create that file. >=20 > We do already support empty directories natively we do not need the .keep > whatever and this works pretty well :) > if a line in the plist is a directory (or @dirrm* ) then the directory is > considered as owned by the package and always created Does this work: packages A and B both create the same empty directory and package C installs files in that directory. Can you install and deinstall A, B and C in any order and will that directory only be deleted when you deinstall the last package? Is pkg already keeping a reference count or something for every directory? > My only problem is to still provide the default grobal hier in provided > by BSD.local.dist (like etc/rc.conf.d etc/libmap.d etc) that said we > have actually only 4 empty directories all documented in the respective > manpages from base where they are used, so yes probably I can just > ignore the mtree at all > Which makes the feature easy to implement then. I don't think those directories actually need to exist. On a fresh installation /usr/local is empty. > In anycase I will limit auto removal to PREFIX (the one supplied when > creating the package) because base has its own mtree and I do not want > to delete any empty directory from base at least until base is package > itself. Yes, it's probably a good idea to list everything outside PREFIX explicitly. Maybe you can limit it to the current @cwd instead of PREFIX but then some existing pkg-plists may need to be fixed. --Sig_/_nqFAbhvujdFgdhLSHEs2Tu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iF4EAREKAAYFAlQHCeEACgkQfoCS2CCgtitCsgD+KO65Hg5MO3mOtx59kSO5OvMy aCuS5fCuaIwJFb6SVJwA/0GqKqnM5/yo5FCfsOG7i4aPUsr7urmlCKvWW0u2rjW/ =sYev -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/_nqFAbhvujdFgdhLSHEs2Tu-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 12:56:50 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D327521; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 12:56:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay002.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay002.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B830312E5; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 12:56:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AocGAK8PB1RR8Z/O/2dsb2JhbABZgw2BKtAZAYELF3eEBAEFViMQCw4KCSUPKh4GExmILQG9PAEXj00HhEwFkziJJJUfg2M7L4JPAQEB Received: from 206.159-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.241.159.206]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 03 Sep 2014 14:56:20 +0200 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s83CuIEO007215; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 14:56:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tijl@coosemans.org) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 14:56:14 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans To: Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life Message-ID: <20140903145614.158f8e89@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/hbFXbJWA_TCeep21pjx2xh8"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 12:56:50 -0000 --Sig_/hbFXbJWA_TCeep21pjx2xh8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:25:39 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wro= te: > On of the most borring thing IMHO in the plist maintainance is all the > directories. Another idea is to support shell glob patterns (*?[) in pkg-plist. This is possible now thanks to staging. It would allow moving PORTDOCS, PORTDATA and PORTEXAMPLES to pkg-plist. But more importantly, it would allow automatic plists that some ports create in post-install to be turned back into a real pkg-plist. Without glob patterns some pkg-plists are just too long or too complicated depending on options. --Sig_/hbFXbJWA_TCeep21pjx2xh8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iF4EAREKAAYFAlQHD/EACgkQfoCS2CCgtivedQEAg5W0pnoj3Z4lpcZEXhErxAQz Uuhd0c37uMDZ+jU5z7IA/j6YsFHMPvtwYaTwfZkXmPs7IbKNl7YL0JU1/LPzgtum =cEGg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/hbFXbJWA_TCeep21pjx2xh8-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 13:02:44 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E458773F for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 13:02:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.egr.msu.edu (gribble.egr.msu.edu [35.9.37.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4E613DB for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 13:02:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gribble (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.egr.msu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC49E22A8A for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 08:56:48 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at egr.msu.edu Received: from mail.egr.msu.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by gribble (gribble.egr.msu.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8tckrjfgyqVM for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 08:56:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from EGR authenticated sender Message-ID: <54071010.9030608@egr.msu.edu> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 08:56:48 -0400 From: Adam McDougall User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: poudriere and DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES References: <54050C82.7090607@pinyon.org> <5405A45C.4040106@FreeBSD.org> <5406864D.7080604@pinyon.org> In-Reply-To: <5406864D.7080604@pinyon.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 13:02:45 -0000 On 09/02/2014 23:09, Russell L. Carter wrote: > > > On 09/02/14 04:05, Alex Dupre wrote: >> Russell L. Carter ha scritto: >>> However, what I would like to learn is if poudriere >>> is able to understand DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=YES, and if so, how to >>> enable it. I'm not asking a political question here, just a technical >>> one. If this is possible, how do I do it? >> >> NO_IGNORE= yes >> > > Thanks! That worked. My family can stop hating on me now, as youtube > lives. > > So, on FreeBSD-current, is there any other way besides chromium or > firefox plus the dastardly nspluginwrapper'd flash plugin to view > youtube, vimeo, etc? I am hoping that I have missed a better way. > Supposedly there are new video protocols coming down the pipe, w/o the > adobe baggage, or so I gather. > > Best, > Russell I've been meaning to take a look at emulators/pipelight after finally noticing it despite the vague name. Funny you should mention pipe? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 13:41:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AB56B0 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 13:41:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 230D41A20 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 13:41:41 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: , , X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=FNaZNpUs c=1 sm=1 a=uNsD4W5u/UlQopoDAqU1YA==:17 a=TM20W-5uK7UA:10 a=y2_VgFVreEoA:10 a=E8PfAvhc8x4A:10 a=AaUjGI9IrlcA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=OA2lqS22AAAA:8 a=We7rNFuht6YXsfKDTjgA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=uNsD4W5u/UlQopoDAqU1YA==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine X-Authed-Username: cm9iZXJ0aHVmZkByY24uY29t Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com header.from=roberthuff@rcn.com; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.mail=roberthuff@rcn.com; spf=neutral; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.user=roberthuff; auth=pass (PLAIN) Received-SPF: neutral (smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com: 209.6.39.223 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of rcn.com) Received: from [209.6.39.223] ([209.6.39.223:42621] helo=jerusalem.litteratus.org) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.2.43620 r(Platform:3.6.2.0)) with ESMTPA id C1/16-64381-39A17045; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 09:41:39 -0400 Message-ID: <54071A92.6050209@rcn.com> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 09:41:38 -0400 From: Robert Huff User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: reinstalling from portmaster backup package Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 13:41:42 -0000 Through a series of steps I won't get into. I deinstalled port X.1 in anticiparion of installing X,2. However, X.2 (built fine but) failed to install. (I'm working on that.) Fortunately, I have a portmaster backup of X.1 which I need to reinstall in the meantime. Unfortunately, I find the portmaster documentation ... obscure ... on how to do this. (OK, so I'm used to ports not packages.) Can someone tell me the command to reinstall (and reregister) X.1? Respectfully, Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 13:41:44 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44778B4 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 13:41:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from stangl.us (stangl.us [66.93.193.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D6601A21 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 13:41:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from scout.stangl.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scout.stangl.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C59317048 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 08:25:27 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at stangl.us Received: from stangl.us ([127.0.0.1]) by scout.stangl.us (scout.stangl.us [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zLshnBNPrp91 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 08:25:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: by scout.stangl.us (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8EDF117046; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 08:25:18 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 08:25:18 -0500 From: Alex Stangl To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life Message-ID: <20140903132518.GA2264@scout.stangl.us> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 13:41:44 -0000 On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 10:25:39AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Hi all, > > Evolutions: > 1/ stop prepending directories in plist with @dir*: let pkg discover the path > correspond to a directory and handle it as such (easy) > > 2/ make pkg automatically remove directories under PREFIX without the need of > adding them in plist, such as only empty directories and directories not under > PREFIX will have to be listed. Of course pkg will not try to remove directories > owned by another package. Hi, Seems to me that with staging in place, plist could become a behind-the-scenes implementation detail, generated automatically during the port build, at least in most cases. Upon pkg deletion, leaving behind files/directories that were not part of the "install" seems reasonable. Maybe there could be some way to notify the user to examine these and manually clean them up, if appropriate. Sometime the pkg delete might be followed immediately by a re-install, in which case the user may have wanted to keep those files around anyhow. Installation packages on Windows work this way, typically only removing files that were put in place at install time, and leaving the user to cleanup any residual files. Alex From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 13:45:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AA19269; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 13:45:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x232.google.com (mail-we0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBAE41A7C; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 13:45:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id u57so8542234wes.23 for ; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 06:45:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Af9rg5BkOnYFXjLr7K1cPFLJ+u8a9uoUFIyqfHngwYM=; b=La8zEqvk56y/7yx+ZVMj14EPiVnmkPdSRQWSOjmRsKLsUfWLBi4vRulxiIZFka691N Uxc/reYOV+HLZLjKXDLpmMzY4tgU4EsdPmHheIyZOq1kTWtWrcLdtovyJm0nU6zQqbuY khMyzAhrk7U5RE0XTQBcAl/UvvX8IUAagxA27xaU5Aa1SR6uKRDatbFSNXkF9DnGAejv m3QcZLQRfe3SwnpalrUcxv4FuFZtVq3CVvT2KZrO/GFNAKsGC7Y1huOuAydMfIz/3bN6 HTez5zyurI5bw0yKHsPjQcCGE7wsIJDzIMX1uCAjUaVBZNXBsTkpdwYmHdF5uc9z1OsX uWNw== X-Received: by 10.180.20.196 with SMTP id p4mr35337468wie.56.1409751909930; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 06:45:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hi4sm15836604wjb.46.2014.09.03.06.45.08 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Sep 2014 06:45:08 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 15:45:06 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Tijl Coosemans Subject: Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life Message-ID: <20140903134506.GJ63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903120144.5bfc3fde@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140903100751.GG63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903143017.372e42a4@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="huG+SbfbdD6eblZQ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140903143017.372e42a4@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 13:45:12 -0000 --huG+SbfbdD6eblZQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 02:30:17PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 12:07:51 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin w= rote: > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 12:01:44PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > >> On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:25:39 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >>> 2/ make pkg automatically remove directories under PREFIX without the > >>> need of adding them in plist, such as only empty directories and > >>> directories not under PREFIX will have to be listed. Of course pkg wi= ll > >>> not try to remove directories owned by another package. > >>>=20 > >>> To achieve the point 2 that will mean we will stop using the mtree > >>> inside packages and create a "hier" package that will have the default > >>> hierarchy and every package but pkg will depend on this hier package > >>> (except if PREFIX !=3D LOCALBASE) > >>=20 > >> I think you can avoid the hier package and thus the PREFIX !=3D LOCALB= ASE > >> problem. > >>=20 > >> Assume there are no packages with empty directories, then pkg can > >> always remove empty directories when deinstalling a package, because > >> no files in the directory means no package requires it. You don't need > >> a hier package in this case. > >>=20 > >> You can add support for packages with empty directories in two ways: > >> - Put a dummy file in the directory, e.g. .PKGNAME.keepme > >> (simple to implement, but maybe some packages really need the > >> directory to be empty or maybe they only expect a specific type of > >> files) > >> - Record something like .PKGNAME.keepme in the pkg db but don't > >> actually create that file. > >=20 > > We do already support empty directories natively we do not need the .ke= ep > > whatever and this works pretty well :) > > if a line in the plist is a directory (or @dirrm* ) then the directory = is > > considered as owned by the package and always created >=20 > Does this work: packages A and B both create the same empty directory > and package C installs files in that directory. Can you install and > deinstall A, B and C in any order and will that directory only be > deleted when you deinstall the last package? yes >=20 > Is pkg already keeping a reference count or something for every > directory? yes >=20 > > My only problem is to still provide the default grobal hier in provided > > by BSD.local.dist (like etc/rc.conf.d etc/libmap.d etc) that said we > > have actually only 4 empty directories all documented in the respective > > manpages from base where they are used, so yes probably I can just > > ignore the mtree at all > > Which makes the feature easy to implement then. >=20 > I don't think those directories actually need to exist. On a fresh > installation /usr/local is empty. true >=20 > > In anycase I will limit auto removal to PREFIX (the one supplied when > > creating the package) because base has its own mtree and I do not want > > to delete any empty directory from base at least until base is package > > itself. >=20 > Yes, it's probably a good idea to list everything outside PREFIX > explicitly. Maybe you can limit it to the current @cwd instead of > PREFIX but then some existing pkg-plists may need to be fixed. regards, Bapt --huG+SbfbdD6eblZQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlQHG2IACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ex+mACgjeNi3AcKr0Zdbf1xXz913KXs qTwAoLqwjFzov3bcfiZu0UaEYbE17JcP =UghQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --huG+SbfbdD6eblZQ-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 13:50:36 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 613A5522 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 13:50:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x232.google.com (mail-we0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8DEF1AE9 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 13:50:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id u57so8550853wes.23 for ; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 06:50:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=eQHX29b3Op9k/hKdzjX/cqq4hWfHj9gFfmeRpq7M+Z4=; b=urpmh/wA+XuaiT+ujhysTV6Y+o6QNiDk4kost8PsBpsf93nDzcbXrURt7/OIbmjtBI qL9kkuhZjGPdwpFaiU1ZFaIlerCKmBl1NEV6URDGjDf+LkapqgF+Uzq70NlxRujJLjAa z5z6awFmX6CktOC3XzRwHjoGNUFVZYpThdgHLO5lWapobq3JjmO1ZARyhNbVdncGQfil 3AKKRZAVaPo3Wnun/s6qnzOYyPCpey+DJYpMismGnh703jsraGa35giCyHsqU03dx2dN TNcUswQheGOkfVzHmUZUXP8EKRr7ggXCjDHWgkhmtptJudl+RWfBPrfAsqKdc4nEGAjK FO7Q== X-Received: by 10.195.12.4 with SMTP id em4mr3736120wjd.98.1409752233245; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 06:50:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b19sm4952549wiv.0.2014.09.03.06.50.31 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Sep 2014 06:50:32 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 15:50:30 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Tijl Coosemans Subject: Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life Message-ID: <20140903135029.GK63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903145614.158f8e89@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wIc/V6YLA2QdyfT4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140903145614.158f8e89@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 13:50:36 -0000 --wIc/V6YLA2QdyfT4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 02:56:14PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:25:39 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin w= rote: > > On of the most borring thing IMHO in the plist maintainance is all the > > directories. >=20 > Another idea is to support shell glob patterns (*?[) in pkg-plist. This > is possible now thanks to staging. It would allow moving PORTDOCS, > PORTDATA and PORTEXAMPLES to pkg-plist. But more importantly, it would > allow automatic plists that some ports create in post-install to be > turned back into a real pkg-plist. Without glob patterns some pkg-plists > are just too long or too complicated depending on options. We could also say pack everything that is in that stage directory. The problem is right now I do like static plist because if something fails = to build for $reason, that the plist doesn't find a file in the staging area a= nd we notice quite quickly that something as failed. with autoplist or globbing w= e do lose this feature and we need to way deal with it. In anycase we won't make full autoplist because we still need to be able to specify credentials files per files if needed. But glob is really appealing= :) regards, Bapt --wIc/V6YLA2QdyfT4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlQHHKUACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzlQgCgkM+1ImRH7EskA5878vfKD5SH 01IAoKnb1+eylmBRRhmpGQqLrcPQQzO4 =JpnS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wIc/V6YLA2QdyfT4-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 14:24:34 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 154CD95; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 14:24:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEBD91FF7; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 14:24:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 682B3BDC6B; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 16:24:30 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=mat.cc; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=plouf; bh=Aj8eSUHEOnP 6YqetHNu81/PQtEw=; b=cQKzfs7BKSDAT+j1Duo3F87i9MG6tWxgaoUnmfzGUfV SGEvPyIPwv6qGW2TwqkxmN0Wr5ifHfcnAkXaAcCp2+OHtWGPsoqR1arxz1zf3ruU aK2+gnZ+NlyYxs+AmJ6d/B//x6VlVpgHMUdy3Kleh8FlJ45herTkZyIC/fYhfDo0 = Received: from gw.in.absolight.net (gw-ecl.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gw.in.absolight.net", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42DE0BDC4C; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 16:24:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ogg.in.absolight.net (ogg.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.239]) by gw.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB3E6158; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 16:24:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ogg.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B43E67302D9F; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 16:24:27 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:24:27 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Michelle Sullivan , mva@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <5405AE54.60809@sorbs.net> References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> <54052DFA.4030808@freebsd.org> <54053372.6020009@my.hennepintech.edu> <5405890F.8080804@freebsd.org> <20140902125256.Horde.uv31ztwymThxUZ-OYPQoBw1@webmail.df.eu> <5405AE54.60809@sorbs.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: ports@freebsd.org, pkg@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 14:24:34 -0000 +--On 2 septembre 2014 13:47:32 +0200 Michelle Sullivan wrote: | Marcus von Appen wrote: |> Alban Hertroys : |> |>> |>> I can totally understand that at some point it starts to get |>> impossible to maintain two separate packaging systems and I understand |>> that you think 2 years is enough time to shake things out, but |>> software vendors aren't that quick. For many, 2 years is a short time. |>> |> |> It also should be noted that everyone had enough time to raise those |> issues |> in the time between tthe announcement and now. No one did. Now that it is |> gone, they are brought up, while they should have been long time ago |> instead. It can't work that way. |> |> My 2 cents in this discussion :-). | | Actually I brought it up as soon as I found the EOL was a deadline for | breaking pkg_* tools, was told, "too late now" - that was more than 2 | weeks ago, less than 2 months ago (forget the date) ... I'm happy with | an EOL and working to upgrade everything, I'm not happy that the EOL was | not actually an EOL and it was actually a deadline. I still don't see what you have to say about what EOL mean, it's *End Of Life* meaning after, it is dead, and won't exist any more. -- Mathieu Arnold From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 14:36:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8D7E83E; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 14:36:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (hades.sorbs.net [67.231.146.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B96711233; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 14:36:33 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0NBB0041XY3AEV00@hades.sorbs.net>; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 07:40:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-id: <5407276D.3050200@sorbs.net> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:36:29 +0200 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: Mathieu Arnold Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> <54052DFA.4030808@freebsd.org> <54053372.6020009@my.hennepintech.edu> <5405890F.8080804@freebsd.org> <20140902125256.Horde.uv31ztwymThxUZ-OYPQoBw1@webmail.df.eu> <5405AE54.60809@sorbs.net> In-reply-to: Cc: ports@freebsd.org, pkg@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, mva@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 14:36:34 -0000 Mathieu Arnold wrote: > I still don't see what you have to say about what EOL mean, it's *End Of > Life* meaning after, it is dead, and won't exist any more. > > Ahh so all those Windows XP servers are dead and don't work anymore... -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 14:36:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F331B9D9 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 14:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 697E7123B for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 14:36:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.82) for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1XPBfb-000ICt-OT>; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:36:23 +0200 Received: from [141.89.176.193] (helo=munin.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.82) for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1XPBfb-000lAn-NQ>; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:36:23 +0200 Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 16:36:22 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: svn: E200019: Version mismatch in 'svn_gnome_keyring' (expecting equality): found 1.8.0, expected 1.8.10 Message-ID: <20140903163622.6dbfb6d8@munin.walstatt.dyndns.org> Organization: FU Berlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.3) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/f1/CGJRapbXkCNmQ_==an69"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Originating-IP: 141.89.176.193 X-ZEDAT-Hint: A X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 14:36:48 -0000 --Sig_/f1/CGJRapbXkCNmQ_==an69 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I receive this error while using /usr/local/bin/svn: svn: E200019: Version mismatch in 'svn_gnome_keyring' (expecting equality): found 1.8.0, expected 1.8.10 It occurs on every usage of the svn binary installed via port devel/subversion. Using /usr/bin/svn as it is installed by the base system works fine. I already tried to recompile the whole port and prerequisits and also deleted it and reinstalled devel/subversion - no success. Somehow I think the system is polluted by some weird config file I've overseen (I also deleted my .subversion folder). Does anybody has any idea? Regards and thanks, Oliver --Sig_/f1/CGJRapbXkCNmQ_==an69 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUBydmAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8aKAH/1/HYHncBhWT+O+9EZvDim9n o+xmP0VATtIauW0RN5FXUL0fhE2EqzMKxn5CTnAk+bv/5zIPez2Q2jszrw9VMko4 hvpvTJb22TOXXT1/JCvqXWPZ3wORrsTAnTHzrOKOf/ZPwxSYHcoBuA3QT5x2EIcS YYTKplKfdZ7qXDVhmMJDLo3lJKdqnNyXmZef831bbmSS4DrQ9FFeOO4eOm3LxNak h1r7sNG+vopv8JhPNGai+2TEszT/l0a28/YPma4+XVmW62QP2qw23CiDmHBucKfo PAE1ZxpYa/ZscnQpVs7XiN/Lm9uucVIMd4HcoIfosZdbSBIhOvDIOtX+nx+bltM= =ufz/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/f1/CGJRapbXkCNmQ_==an69-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 14:55:08 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B0E53B7 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 14:55:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmailer.gwdg.de (fmailer.gwdg.de [134.76.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDD7A14B8 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 14:55:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from um-excht-a02.um.gwdg.de ([134.76.11.222] helo=email.gwdg.de) by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XPBxS-0004tp-9M; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:54:50 +0200 Received: from krabat.raven.hur (91.21.150.246) by email.gwdg.de (134.76.9.211) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 16:54:50 +0200 Message-ID: <54072BB5.5090209@gwdg.de> Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 16:54:45 +0200 From: Rainer Hurling User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Huff , Subject: Re: reinstalling from portmaster backup package References: <54071A92.6050209@rcn.com> In-Reply-To: <54071A92.6050209@rcn.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Level: - X-Virus-Scanned: (clean) by clamav X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 14:55:08 -0000 Am 03.09.2014 um 15:41 schrieb Robert Huff: > Through a series of steps I won't get into. I deinstalled port X.1 in > anticiparion of installing X,2. However, X.2 (built fine but) failed to > install. (I'm working on that.) > Fortunately, I have a portmaster backup of X.1 which I need to > reinstall in the meantime. Unfortunately, I find the portmaster > documentation ... obscure ... on how to do this. (OK, so I'm used to > ports not packages.) > Can someone tell me the command to reinstall (and reregister) X.1? Hmm. If you mean the files, portmaster backuped in /usr/ports/packages/portmaster-backup/, for me a simple 'pkg add X.1' is sufficient for install and registration of that port. Or do I misunderstand something? HTH, Rainer Hurling > > Respectfully, > > > Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 14:56:18 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B392145F; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 14:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6861914CC; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 14:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2882BDC70; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 16:56:16 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=mat.cc; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=plouf; bh=lCNMDywaIUV FGa1QZgLmEituujQ=; b=GB9F1Yk7f6vh8t5iRzTYL9NA4w9x+hdFNgM9afKwTZK LUaaxflftWWTalBgSyqaxQySoPjE6+XL5TDl01YF3iePUPekKjVjeej2KB0U24Js Yxbu340NnmsWSFFq+yBusW9p5f3atTxfsJ+KmhBWe6JU/2By1fCF+vZ6QCBAL++0 = Received: from gw.in.absolight.net (gw-ecl.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gw.in.absolight.net", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8BA3DBDC5D; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 16:56:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ogg.in.absolight.net (ogg.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.239]) by gw.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF268614F; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 16:56:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ogg.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54783730328C; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 16:56:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:56:14 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Michelle Sullivan Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool Message-ID: <9DAF63F1F61E0FC2F6B237BD@ogg.in.absolight.net> In-Reply-To: <5407276D.3050200@sorbs.net> References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> <54052DFA.4030808@freebsd.org> <54053372.6020009@my.hennepintech.edu> <5405890F.8080804@freebsd.org> <20140902125256.Horde.uv31ztwymThxUZ-OYPQoBw1@webmail.df.eu> <5405AE54.60809@sorbs.net> <5407276D.3050200@sorbs.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: ports@freebsd.org, pkg@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 14:56:18 -0000 +--On 3 septembre 2014 16:36:29 +0200 Michelle Sullivan wrote: | Mathieu Arnold wrote: |> I still don't see what you have to say about what EOL mean, it's *End Of |> Life* meaning after, it is dead, and won't exist any more. |> |> | Ahh so all those Windows XP servers are dead and don't work anymore... Not at all, but you don't update them any more. -- Mathieu Arnold From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 14:58:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D17791A; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 14:58:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay005.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay005.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC3C14F8; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 14:58:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AocGAOErB1RR8Z/O/2dsb2JhbABZgw2BKtAaAYEKF3eEBAEFVh4FEAsOCgklDyoeBhMZiC0BvgABF49NB4RMBZM4hlSCUIE2k2mDYzsvgk8BAQE Received: from 206.159-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.241.159.206]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 03 Sep 2014 16:56:29 +0200 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s83EuSur007955; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 16:56:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tijl@coosemans.org) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 16:56:22 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans To: Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life Message-ID: <20140903165622.3bff54e0@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <20140903135029.GK63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903145614.158f8e89@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140903135029.GK63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/1XnmBf0FkaxhRJFjCqHwx0p"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 14:58:02 -0000 --Sig_/1XnmBf0FkaxhRJFjCqHwx0p Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 15:50:30 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wro= te: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 02:56:14PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:25:39 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin = wrote: >>> On of the most borring thing IMHO in the plist maintainance is all the >>> directories. >>=20 >> Another idea is to support shell glob patterns (*?[) in pkg-plist. This >> is possible now thanks to staging. It would allow moving PORTDOCS, >> PORTDATA and PORTEXAMPLES to pkg-plist. But more importantly, it would >> allow automatic plists that some ports create in post-install to be >> turned back into a real pkg-plist. Without glob patterns some pkg-plists >> are just too long or too complicated depending on options. >=20 > We could also say pack everything that is in that stage directory. >=20 > The problem is right now I do like static plist because if something > fails to build for $reason, that the plist doesn't find a file in the > staging area and we notice quite quickly that something as failed. > with autoplist or globbing we do lose this feature and we need to way > deal with it. > In anycase we won't make full autoplist because we still need to be > able to specify credentials files per files if needed. But glob is > really appealing :) I completely agree :) Files should be listed explicitly if possible, but sometimes it's very inconvenient and in these cases some ports roll their own autoplist implementations which worse than having a static pkg-plist with a few glob patterns. Moving PORTDOCS etc. to pkg-plist means all package content is listed in one file. That will probably simplify check-plist too. --Sig_/1XnmBf0FkaxhRJFjCqHwx0p Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iF4EAREKAAYFAlQHLBsACgkQfoCS2CCgtit1cwD+NsDS0KI1oTBftI9sSPvOg62U Pms0GhDvm49rhSuL8NQA/3IaWrPENcl32LPEOYzSRhgoP4xHmOKZmz34I5D13BiH =UYgI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/1XnmBf0FkaxhRJFjCqHwx0p-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 15:00:24 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA4B1B31 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 15:00:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x22d.google.com (mail-wg0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 493A615D7 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 15:00:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id k14so8502205wgh.28 for ; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 08:00:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=14xj5pL1N8EKCHP4BUuY+oPRB2H2KFM+2zKER+51FrA=; b=GI1UpFrTYLG2Bi147wcXdc0xLY+HKW+pqEooLeT7W+wGcsoN4rsjbL1DOfTHBc2WB5 Rq5NIkUfrLZq3+DT/2+jfTo/+aZhPu5gyU73R1ZP49JwLARjD1LixWCrX8Q5ZtJjcVap pmZB/n4k9qLOsNwTjW6ob34poryW1jarQyKlcb3S5EGJtvjU+MhiMpa0CQ08nzyq+YTa RYYSFUah1GEUBRunLFtNWIvLO9A5aXCh2QsJE5BjJtj87i3gTJXK7zVUgxb93lGFHezT 72Ors4H2NhGAtETq+3WYMclhjJKqf5ZgL6/Bc0glYxIVgrGENNbdEcx6AlQ9xRi3vaEM 77xQ== X-Received: by 10.180.78.201 with SMTP id d9mr36885788wix.12.1409756421663; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 08:00:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id cz3sm16201557wjb.23.2014.09.03.08.00.20 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Sep 2014 08:00:20 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 17:00:18 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Tijl Coosemans Subject: Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life Message-ID: <20140903150018.GL63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903145614.158f8e89@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140903135029.GK63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903165622.3bff54e0@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dpynvXbW/eW9Tpc3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140903165622.3bff54e0@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 15:00:24 -0000 --dpynvXbW/eW9Tpc3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 04:56:22PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 15:50:30 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin w= rote: > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 02:56:14PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > >> On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:25:39 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >>> On of the most borring thing IMHO in the plist maintainance is all the > >>> directories. > >>=20 > >> Another idea is to support shell glob patterns (*?[) in pkg-plist. Th= is > >> is possible now thanks to staging. It would allow moving PORTDOCS, > >> PORTDATA and PORTEXAMPLES to pkg-plist. But more importantly, it would > >> allow automatic plists that some ports create in post-install to be > >> turned back into a real pkg-plist. Without glob patterns some pkg-pli= sts > >> are just too long or too complicated depending on options. > >=20 > > We could also say pack everything that is in that stage directory. > >=20 > > The problem is right now I do like static plist because if something > > fails to build for $reason, that the plist doesn't find a file in the > > staging area and we notice quite quickly that something as failed. > > with autoplist or globbing we do lose this feature and we need to way > > deal with it. > > In anycase we won't make full autoplist because we still need to be > > able to specify credentials files per files if needed. But glob is > > really appealing :) >=20 > I completely agree :) Files should be listed explicitly if possible, > but sometimes it's very inconvenient and in these cases some ports > roll their own autoplist implementations which worse than having a > static pkg-plist with a few glob patterns. >=20 > Moving PORTDOCS etc. to pkg-plist means all package content is listed > in one file. That will probably simplify check-plist too. Right I'll implement globbing (one level not recursive) regards, Bapt --dpynvXbW/eW9Tpc3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlQHLQIACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyZIQCfRB/Exm7X+5gQ+N5EJKgQLAn+ 8gMAn1eTM7wNB6PxTcrJsa5TICiIv/ny =Qedn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dpynvXbW/eW9Tpc3-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 15:15:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDC9B765; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 15:15:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (hades.sorbs.net [67.231.146.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE4B818AD; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 15:15:39 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0NBB00429ZWFEV00@hades.sorbs.net>; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 08:19:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-id: <54073097.6000006@sorbs.net> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 17:15:35 +0200 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: Tom Evans Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> <54052DFA.4030808@freebsd.org> <54053372.6020009@my.hennepintech.edu> <5405890F.8080804@freebsd.org> <20140902125256.Horde.uv31ztwymThxUZ-OYPQoBw1@webmail.df.eu> <5405AE54.60809@sorbs.net> <1D2B4A91-E76C-43A0-BE75-D926357EF1AF@gmail.com> <5405E4F5.4090902@sorbs.net> <5406BD65.705@digsys.bg> <5406ED34.7090301@sorbs.net> <5406F00C.6090504@digsys.bg> <358B9E99-5E02-47BA-9E30-045986150966@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <540711FF.3050409@sorbs.net> <47F4AAAA-2D88-4F03-8602-880C4B129305@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <54072011.7030800@sorbs.net> <540723EC.5000908@sorbs.net> In-reply-to: Cc: "ports@freebsd.org" , freebsd-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 15:15:40 -0000 Tom Evans wrote: > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > >> Tom Evans wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Michelle Sullivan wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I think portsnap should provide 'stable' - tested, known >>>> working, security patched... >>>> >>>> >>> 100%, and as soon as someone comes along who is prepared to do and pay >>> for that, I think we would all enjoy it. >>> >>> Unfortunately, someone like that doesn't yet exist, so it is >>> unrealistic to just expect that infrastructure to be there. >>> >>> >> Well as I was one of the people trying to raise funds for FreeBSD (for >> general stuff, not specifically this) and as $employer will *not* be >> adopting FreeBSD now the chances of having such just reduced. >> >> > > That's a fallacious argument; "if *someone* doesn't put the > infrastructure in to place then *we* can't contribute more". > Didn't say that, though I can see how it looks like that (because you're not taking into account other emails.) If the system had not been broken over night I would still be well on to my way of to getting corporate support, but with echos of Mandrake (co-incidentally produced in the same country as the latest breakage) they're going to stay with enterprise OSs. > This is what Linux distributions spend their money on; employing > people to do infrastructure engineering. When a new release of httpd > happens, people at Red Hat manually back-merge fixes to the version of > httpd that is in their package repository. > > FreeBSD has volunteers who maintain the ports tree, they have no time > to manually merge and test fixes, so when a new release of httpd > happens in FreeBSD, the version changes and you get all the new > features and bug fixes. > Nope, as an ex-maintainer I can vouch for this. > So if you use FreeBSD, that infrastructure is not there; you need to > do it in house. Like I was doing. (and am not anymore because the entire build system is now screwed and I'm not going to build it again.) > How tricky that is depends on the size of your house - > Netflix have no problems, Yahoo have no problems, SMEs like the one I > work for - problems. > > I'm not denying the problem; just that specifying what should or > shouldn't happen with the ports tree is not productive if you aren't > proposing to actually do it yourself. > > Here's the problem, I saw the EOL last October, I read it, I understood that after Sept 1, 2014 the old packaging system will no long be supported as it's "EOL" I continued the production database upgrade. I continued my building of a completely new Puppet Environment for the production servers. I learned and built my own build system using jenkings, virtualbox and poudriere. I even built it so it would build both pkgng and pkg_* versions of the repos... and with the pkgng without docs (just reverse engineering the public FreeBSD pkg system.) I continued freebsd-update'ing production servers to 9.2 then 9.3 where possible (testing, and doing it all by hand) then integrating it into puppet - in many cases writing my own puppet modules and patches to make it work with FreeBSD (like the facter patch that gives interface aliases.) I learned that the ports tree was being updated so much that things would break every day in just 580 packages I have. I changed the system so it would only start building when triggered and would continually cycle until it got a complete and stable repo (with regression testing)... sometimes this took over a month to get stable (mostly just a few days.) I took over maintainership of some ports to get staging done and to help others (including virtuoso - which was no small task and something which I don't use at all - amongst others I don't use.) At this point (July/August 2014) I saw a convo between bapt and someone else that led me to question , "So Sept 1, 2014 the entire ports builds will change and pkg_* will be completely broken" .. - not just EOL, but updated so they no longer work at all Then around mid August after some patches had *finally* been applied I triggered a new build which continued to cycle due to a bad TCL update until August 30 when it 'fixed itself' ... but the build continued to slowly make its way through got to 9.2-i386 on Sept 1... and guess what... something caused it to restart because of a bad update and so Sept 2 came and bapt deliberately and knowingly broke pkg_* in the ports tree and my entire repo for non-pkgng started building itself for pkg ... which means my environment cannot be tested, so it'll never complete and I can not upgrade without going to every server manually... not to mention I have to rebuild the build environment completely to make it work now, then I have to rebuild the testing environment to cope with the switch from pkg_* to pkg, and then finally I have to switch all servers to pkg and tell puppet to use pkg instead of pkg_* ... I've had about 2 months - even with keeping up the notices - and all I got was, "No, you should plan better"... Well that's a real good way of getting people who can help to keep helping... FUCK THAT! Michelle -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 15:17:51 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B076A8E; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 15:17:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (hades.sorbs.net [67.231.146.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D9F818E4; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 15:17:51 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0NBC0042B004EV00@hades.sorbs.net>; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 08:21:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-id: <5407311C.5070903@sorbs.net> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 17:17:48 +0200 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: Mathieu Arnold Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> <54052DFA.4030808@freebsd.org> <54053372.6020009@my.hennepintech.edu> <5405890F.8080804@freebsd.org> <20140902125256.Horde.uv31ztwymThxUZ-OYPQoBw1@webmail.df.eu> <5405AE54.60809@sorbs.net> <5407276D.3050200@sorbs.net> <9DAF63F1F61E0FC2F6B237BD@ogg.in.absolight.net> In-reply-to: <9DAF63F1F61E0FC2F6B237BD@ogg.in.absolight.net> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, pkg@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 15:17:51 -0000 Mathieu Arnold wrote: > +--On 3 septembre 2014 16:36:29 +0200 Michelle Sullivan > wrote: > | Mathieu Arnold wrote: > |> I still don't see what you have to say about what EOL mean, it's *End Of > |> Life* meaning after, it is dead, and won't exist any more. > |> > |> > | Ahh so all those Windows XP servers are dead and don't work anymore... > > Not at all, but you don't update them any more. > > Actually you do, but it does nothing... just like freebsd-update on any EOL release... Microsoft didn't release a patch that would change the base system so you can no longer install any software... They just stopped providing updates, then later stopped providing security updates. -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 15:21:14 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 766C4C5A; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 15:21:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2ABCD1991; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 15:21:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 758AEBDC4C; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 17:21:12 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=mat.cc; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=plouf; bh=heWRH7OprhS SCsmTR9UhrGkAvCs=; b=AtCPliyl4/Uw7BGODhYk1DCf21xPxxQyPPiCu84lIAq i4JVLHJUMI49h4uikHiATvD4FHOTbcq8JhPIWP/8Ybp6Q1WeK2fmXTUyhBkpRcct jftzF0lMTWEs9T9aSq2/Vxdyd8hLiGwzgsW0xBlN5MdFzZf8DyzEjqFx6kmFkNC4 = Received: from gw.in.absolight.net (gw-ecl.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gw.in.absolight.net", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 51FC6BDC2E; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 17:21:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ogg.in.absolight.net (ogg.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.239]) by gw.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE5E6158; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 17:21:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ogg.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827907303680; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 17:21:10 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 17:21:10 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Michelle Sullivan Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool Message-ID: <562F5E76969DAAFC2106C9EC@ogg.in.absolight.net> In-Reply-To: <5407311C.5070903@sorbs.net> References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> <54052DFA.4030808@freebsd.org> <54053372.6020009@my.hennepintech.edu> <5405890F.8080804@freebsd.org> <20140902125256.Horde.uv31ztwymThxUZ-OYPQoBw1@webmail.df.eu> <5405AE54.60809@sorbs.net> <5407276D.3050200@sorbs.net> <9DAF63F1F61E0FC2F6B237BD@ogg.in.absolight.net> <5407311C.5070903@sorbs.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: ports@freebsd.org, pkg@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 15:21:14 -0000 +--On 3 septembre 2014 17:17:48 +0200 Michelle Sullivan wrote: | Mathieu Arnold wrote: |> +--On 3 septembre 2014 16:36:29 +0200 Michelle Sullivan |> wrote: |> | Mathieu Arnold wrote: |> |> I still don't see what you have to say about what EOL mean, it's *End |> |> Of Life* meaning after, it is dead, and won't exist any more. |> |> |> |> |> | Ahh so all those Windows XP servers are dead and don't work anymore... |> |> Not at all, but you don't update them any more. |> |> | Actually you do, but it does nothing... just like freebsd-update on any | EOL release... | | Microsoft didn't release a patch that would change the base system so | you can no longer install any software... They just stopped providing | updates, then later stopped providing security updates. You can still go and fetch/build software. You can't do it using the FreeBSD App Store though. -- Mathieu Arnold From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 15:40:15 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C213D7C8 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 15:40:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from olgeni.olgeni.com (host-156-246-171-31.cloudsigma.com [31.171.246.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B8B1B58 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 15:40:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.2.15] (unknown [5.8.101.242]) by olgeni.olgeni.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2726B174623 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 17:40:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 17:40:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Jimmy Olgeni X-X-Sender: olgeni@backoffice To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Python's autoplist and man pages Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) X-OpenPGP-KeyID: 0x90B7A98E6450AE47 X-OpenPGP-Fingerprint: 7133 AB4D DFC8 0A0D F891 B0D2 90B7 A98E 6450 AE47 X-OpenPGP-URL: http://olgeni.olgeni.com/~olgeni/pgp/olgeni@olgeni.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 15:40:15 -0000 Hi, Did anything change with regard to autoplist and compressed man pages? devel/ipython used to work fine, but now man pages are no longer detected correctly: ====> Compressing man pages (compress-man) =========================================================================== ====> Running Q/A tests (stage-qa) ====> Checking for pkg-plist issues (check-plist) ===> Parsing plist ===> Checking for items in STAGEDIR missing from pkg-plist Error: Orphaned: man/man1/ipcluster.1.gz Error: Orphaned: man/man1/ipcontroller.1.gz Error: Orphaned: man/man1/ipengine.1.gz Error: Orphaned: man/man1/ipython.1.gz ===> Checking for directories owned by MTREEs ===> Checking for directories handled by dependencies ===> Checking for items in pkg-plist which are not in STAGEDIR Error: Missing: man/man1/ipcluster.1 Error: Missing: man/man1/ipcontroller.1 Error: Missing: man/man1/ipengine.1 Error: Missing: man/man1/ipython.1 ===> Error: Plist issues found. *** Error code 1 gzipped man pages are installed as usual, but the uncompressed version is listed in the automatic plist. -- jimmy From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 15:46:30 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F5C1B1D for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 15:46:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com (mail-wi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B75C21C49 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 15:46:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id ho1so1199941wib.8 for ; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 08:46:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=n2iVLtyRC9RI5Ti3u3iS4WedlcMVpfREUmHEyT0VxJ4=; b=nZuWOJfpzfLH5akPuQvkFy611sCRhnhktQt0Tt1mxYiNZvR+j3F9T9UiiF/FW9LBlf B7003PkUHpXY9kHjbKAHQfIcSylcEJBiKaD4whxVnAKivnoBSwjWfLVnDCuorBow7zLd IXTCvBYQeYqHyeKDlLYJPJZXkVVzHatYsYktMLCfGtUEJ19HGu2xPkTgsPneiYyKrCSF CJemx03XxGhqjHnOf/8N7cJijc4y4DGgzDfcpH3MJ85qW1In7aKzehk8pwH7JpFFiMZQ J1dbtGpqChDrLpGJxNksEzHsYl/MG50OiKyzzrm91wTPHa9i8/EeN+1IRlpKxk9LOBfc ErFQ== X-Received: by 10.180.13.20 with SMTP id d20mr24742533wic.28.1409759186808; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 08:46:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h6sm16344005wjb.33.2014.09.03.08.46.25 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Sep 2014 08:46:25 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 17:46:23 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Jimmy Olgeni Subject: Re: Python's autoplist and man pages Message-ID: <20140903154623.GM63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M2Pxvdb9QxnGd/3e" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 15:46:30 -0000 --M2Pxvdb9QxnGd/3e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 05:40:08PM +0200, Jimmy Olgeni wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > Did anything change with regard to autoplist and compressed man pages? >=20 > devel/ipython used to work fine, but now man pages are no longer detected > correctly: >=20 > =3D=3D=3D=3D> Compressing man pages (compress-man) > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D > =3D=3D=3D=3D> Running Q/A tests (stage-qa) > =3D=3D=3D=3D> Checking for pkg-plist issues (check-plist) > =3D=3D=3D> Parsing plist > =3D=3D=3D> Checking for items in STAGEDIR missing from pkg-plist > Error: Orphaned: man/man1/ipcluster.1.gz > Error: Orphaned: man/man1/ipcontroller.1.gz > Error: Orphaned: man/man1/ipengine.1.gz > Error: Orphaned: man/man1/ipython.1.gz > =3D=3D=3D> Checking for directories owned by MTREEs > =3D=3D=3D> Checking for directories handled by dependencies > =3D=3D=3D> Checking for items in pkg-plist which are not in STAGEDIR > Error: Missing: man/man1/ipcluster.1 > Error: Missing: man/man1/ipcontroller.1 > Error: Missing: man/man1/ipengine.1 > Error: Missing: man/man1/ipython.1 I cannot see how it could work given that all the manpage in plist should h= ave their compressed extension (.gz) and check-plist is right regards, Bapt --M2Pxvdb9QxnGd/3e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlQHN88ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Eyr/QCgh/+JaYk/nKm0x9KHRVs7j/SQ ZOEAni46ovhdHBGaoawC0I5RC0lNJtiO =hLyE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --M2Pxvdb9QxnGd/3e-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 16:01:29 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0439E56B for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 16:01:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x22b.google.com (mail-we0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C39A1E52 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 16:01:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f171.google.com with SMTP id u56so8834054wes.30 for ; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 09:01:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=HHCYsZY+sa/OnWT/ZM92BgD96HSEu6jc+4itNgsOn0E=; b=XOO2SrqzIKlIyVJjYGtJoLyXLgG4Hvadbq9myjPT8leqB8eM0LaXYK+Xl/29JqZAhb sqP4qmBtzpXSirqJIUlb4BSCuwDQSUbJJPjmcWqKKOu0rYUeS3AHFkx207hgUoqEJ0gC o/ZcVq1W7t7RtalQSuhqCWFPoBi++tZCr7faEK9B54bBDe9O0SbNf3hiTwGiBBUEygbT lsLHtTsXjY2RXIwTkODFJyCQExzcIzHzu0suHfxURKFg2UgJ7Ch+eiMB8zC1Goahr7nh PuYH05za5hG9Eo6ehoQ3dIgMV0B9syujoVqL50I3FiCyYGNN7DYFcNaJAE3Pjoavchvo LsIA== X-Received: by 10.180.230.197 with SMTP id ta5mr36152181wic.10.1409760086880; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 09:01:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hi4sm16356501wjb.46.2014.09.03.09.01.25 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Sep 2014 09:01:25 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 18:01:22 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Jimmy Olgeni Subject: Re: Python's autoplist and man pages Message-ID: <20140903160122.GN63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20140903154623.GM63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="E0h0CbphJD8hN+Gf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140903154623.GM63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:01:29 -0000 --E0h0CbphJD8hN+Gf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 05:46:23PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 05:40:08PM +0200, Jimmy Olgeni wrote: > >=20 > > Hi, > >=20 > > Did anything change with regard to autoplist and compressed man pages? > >=20 > > devel/ipython used to work fine, but now man pages are no longer detect= ed > > correctly: > >=20 > > =3D=3D=3D=3D> Compressing man pages (compress-man) > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D > > =3D=3D=3D=3D> Running Q/A tests (stage-qa) > > =3D=3D=3D=3D> Checking for pkg-plist issues (check-plist) > > =3D=3D=3D> Parsing plist > > =3D=3D=3D> Checking for items in STAGEDIR missing from pkg-plist > > Error: Orphaned: man/man1/ipcluster.1.gz > > Error: Orphaned: man/man1/ipcontroller.1.gz > > Error: Orphaned: man/man1/ipengine.1.gz > > Error: Orphaned: man/man1/ipython.1.gz > > =3D=3D=3D> Checking for directories owned by MTREEs > > =3D=3D=3D> Checking for directories handled by dependencies > > =3D=3D=3D> Checking for items in pkg-plist which are not in STAGEDIR > > Error: Missing: man/man1/ipcluster.1 > > Error: Missing: man/man1/ipcontroller.1 > > Error: Missing: man/man1/ipengine.1 > > Error: Missing: man/man1/ipython.1 >=20 > I cannot see how it could work given that all the manpage in plist should= have > their compressed extension (.gz) and check-plist is right >=20 > regards, > Bapt Never mind, it was my fault, and antoine fixed it (thanks!) regards, Bapt --E0h0CbphJD8hN+Gf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlQHO1IACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyNtgCgsEiLzUtwrZLUHqjpyOEe2u98 L9MAn1tvzuG+CMI265Hwlex+7zRhyvbM =Ub8X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --E0h0CbphJD8hN+Gf-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 16:09:15 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B75A18D7 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 16:09:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com (mail-wg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4816D1EB9 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 16:09:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id l18so8674624wgh.0 for ; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 09:09:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=TZ5cctS/ynaDxSis5Mf74PF/5ZWAIgWlp03j1b4gPqY=; b=nFte6Z1phgBhz/J9ni11NdkXcNVPhi7jRVyO+gI2fWd9GH0KTUWQvfapx00u/+DzUD oGD8SB2jfwJc3oPgjSYCvXi1RSy3g25sumjXYA5wMyK8AGyhS23x9pTI3RAtxxcmPRL8 Jme4ymoZ8PX/enmKoKfQ7OFKCLiPS1J13cuCK4I7SCDxGPkP9BC1ep6fINd0Y5JHcEXw vCEFqyuG00Z1sGrfxJnU8hwJNl0BqlNBYpmzPuQUIMGEhIdkiNGx9Cm+am9SPp7tjzef GDvC4J+a9hTut44CowZ+FvYj6uY8Hm5aFXkVPHBiSz16NJjwJ8Eh8KFm2E0N3pbMZfhL w7jw== X-Received: by 10.180.108.147 with SMTP id hk19mr36082181wib.4.1409760553521; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 09:09:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id lh5sm16484171wjb.12.2014.09.03.09.09.12 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Sep 2014 09:09:12 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 18:09:10 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Tijl Coosemans Subject: Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life Message-ID: <20140903160908.GO63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903145614.158f8e89@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140903135029.GK63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903165622.3bff54e0@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sGwo475CiIwWEjLI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140903165622.3bff54e0@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:09:15 -0000 --sGwo475CiIwWEjLI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 04:56:22PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 15:50:30 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin w= rote: > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 02:56:14PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > >> On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:25:39 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >>> On of the most borring thing IMHO in the plist maintainance is all the > >>> directories. > >>=20 > >> Another idea is to support shell glob patterns (*?[) in pkg-plist. Th= is > >> is possible now thanks to staging. It would allow moving PORTDOCS, > >> PORTDATA and PORTEXAMPLES to pkg-plist. But more importantly, it would > >> allow automatic plists that some ports create in post-install to be > >> turned back into a real pkg-plist. Without glob patterns some pkg-pli= sts > >> are just too long or too complicated depending on options. > >=20 > > We could also say pack everything that is in that stage directory. > >=20 > > The problem is right now I do like static plist because if something > > fails to build for $reason, that the plist doesn't find a file in the > > staging area and we notice quite quickly that something as failed. > > with autoplist or globbing we do lose this feature and we need to way > > deal with it. > > In anycase we won't make full autoplist because we still need to be > > able to specify credentials files per files if needed. But glob is > > really appealing :) >=20 > I completely agree :) Files should be listed explicitly if possible, > but sometimes it's very inconvenient and in these cases some ports > roll their own autoplist implementations which worse than having a > static pkg-plist with a few glob patterns. >=20 > Moving PORTDOCS etc. to pkg-plist means all package content is listed > in one file. That will probably simplify check-plist too. Glob sounds nice but can lead to easy failures with files named with glob patterns like archivers/deco regards, Bapt --sGwo475CiIwWEjLI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlQHPSQACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ez8igCeNNxgHvWBW9m5P+EUagSb1WDd PwcAoMF+raIQiZH7xMXA/LPD7tuStyD0 =6cXb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sGwo475CiIwWEjLI-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 16:37:43 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 883CB159; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 16:37:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout02.t-online.de (mailout02.t-online.de [194.25.134.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailout00.t-online.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47B3212CC; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 16:37:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fwd33.aul.t-online.de (fwd33.aul.t-online.de [172.20.27.144]) by mailout02.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id A67CC53BB55; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 18:37:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.119.33] (EB4Ee-ZpZhuqM07Zms+n2uT5jPfkCKJBh9mtjmd5M+RAhZ4w7QMvDfxhSxfgz1Iw1H@[84.154.101.219]) by fwd33.t-online.de with (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) esmtp id 1XPDYo-2F8TGy0; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 18:37:30 +0200 Message-ID: <540743C3.2000601@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 18:37:23 +0200 From: Stefan Esser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "O. Hartmann" , FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: svn: E200019: Version mismatch in 'svn_gnome_keyring' (expecting equality): found 1.8.0, expected 1.8.10 References: <20140903163622.6dbfb6d8@munin.walstatt.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20140903163622.6dbfb6d8@munin.walstatt.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ID: EB4Ee-ZpZhuqM07Zms+n2uT5jPfkCKJBh9mtjmd5M+RAhZ4w7QMvDfxhSxfgz1Iw1H X-TOI-MSGID: 6ed46b46-ef12-400b-8c36-9f95a534a1a3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:37:43 -0000 Am 03.09.2014 um 16:36 schrieb O. Hartmann: > > I receive this error while using /usr/local/bin/svn: > > svn: E200019: Version mismatch in 'svn_gnome_keyring' (expecting > equality): found 1.8.0, expected 1.8.10 > > It occurs on every usage of the svn binary installed via port > devel/subversion. Using /usr/bin/svn as it is installed by the base > system works fine. Hi Oliver, I have experienced a similar problem after the upgrade of the port to 1.8.10, but with kwallet instead of gnome-keyring. The system SVN continued to work (probably because it lacks support for the KDE or Gnome wallet applications?). In my case, removal of the offending wallet application from the config file (~/.subversion/config) solved the problem for me and I did not further research the topic: ### Section for authentication and authorization customizations. [auth] ### Set password stores used by Subversion. They should be ### delimited by spaces or commas. The order of values determines ### the order in which password stores are used. ### Valid password stores: ### gnome-keyring (Unix-like systems) ### kwallet (Unix-like systems) ### keychain (Mac OS X) ### windows-cryptoapi (Windows) # password-stores = gnome-keyring,kwallet password-stores = gnome-keyring In your case, removal of gnome-keyring should get you going again. (I had not working X11 at the time of this issue, and therefore could not check, whether a start of KDE after installation of the svn-1.8.10 port might have resolved the issue ...) > I already tried to recompile the whole port and prerequisits and also > deleted it and reinstalled devel/subversion - no success. Somehow I > think the system is polluted by some weird config file I've overseen (I > also deleted my .subversion folder). I looked up the routine that checks compatibility, but ran out of time. It is in the svn sources but I did not keep note of the file and function that emits the error message. And since the above change to the config file made the problem disappear (and there were no other reports on the mail lists), I lost interest in analyzing the root cause. > Does anybody has any idea? Please try with only kwallet or no external password store defined in the config file. You may also check, whether starting SVN with gnome-keyring active will fix the issue. I'm not sure, whether this version check is new in 1.8.9, or why it never before caused problems for me - but again, I do not have time for research ... Best regards, STefan From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 17:21:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BA18B9B; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 17:21:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay006.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay006.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFB9C19AE; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 17:21:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AocGAPRMB1RR8Z/O/2dsb2JhbABZgw2BKtAbAYEMF3eEBAEFVh4FEAsOCgklDyoeBhMZiC0BvkUBF49NB4RMBZM4hlSCUIE2k2mDYzsvgk8BAQE Received: from 206.159-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.241.159.206]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 03 Sep 2014 19:21:13 +0200 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s83HLCI6008691; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 19:21:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tijl@coosemans.org) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 19:21:06 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans To: Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life Message-ID: <20140903192106.77fecfdf@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <20140903160908.GO63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903145614.158f8e89@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140903135029.GK63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903165622.3bff54e0@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140903160908.GO63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/=4sw95FiELdDmRO33KMgcuA"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 17:21:17 -0000 --Sig_/=4sw95FiELdDmRO33KMgcuA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 18:09:10 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wro= te: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 04:56:22PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 15:50:30 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin = wrote: >>> On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 02:56:14PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >>>> On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:25:39 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>>>> On of the most borring thing IMHO in the plist maintainance is all the >>>>> directories. >>>>=20 >>>> Another idea is to support shell glob patterns (*?[) in pkg-plist. Th= is >>>> is possible now thanks to staging. It would allow moving PORTDOCS, >>>> PORTDATA and PORTEXAMPLES to pkg-plist. But more importantly, it would >>>> allow automatic plists that some ports create in post-install to be >>>> turned back into a real pkg-plist. Without glob patterns some pkg-pli= sts >>>> are just too long or too complicated depending on options. >>>=20 >>> We could also say pack everything that is in that stage directory. >>>=20 >>> The problem is right now I do like static plist because if something >>> fails to build for $reason, that the plist doesn't find a file in the >>> staging area and we notice quite quickly that something as failed. >>> with autoplist or globbing we do lose this feature and we need to way >>> deal with it. >>> In anycase we won't make full autoplist because we still need to be >>> able to specify credentials files per files if needed. But glob is >>> really appealing :) >>=20 >> I completely agree :) Files should be listed explicitly if possible, >> but sometimes it's very inconvenient and in these cases some ports >> roll their own autoplist implementations which worse than having a >> static pkg-plist with a few glob patterns. >>=20 >> Moving PORTDOCS etc. to pkg-plist means all package content is listed >> in one file. That will probably simplify check-plist too. >=20 > Glob sounds nice but can lead to easy failures with files named with > glob patterns like archivers/deco Hmm. Those characters would have to be escaped, just like on the command line. glob(3) already handles all of that though. --Sig_/=4sw95FiELdDmRO33KMgcuA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iF4EAREKAAYFAlQHTgcACgkQfoCS2CCgtislSAD+IkVPZjmVXImSHHtNMroL+0wW vIXF7hsqlpa6OO6WhGkBAIJ+if8qxb63p94nBp2yYEmn9luu6QQFUMfR9bnAxNIG =O6Vu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/=4sw95FiELdDmRO33KMgcuA-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 18:34:30 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96E79D5F; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 18:34:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A69D117D; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 18:34:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAD356A6027; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 20:34:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s83IYQtx016736; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 20:34:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: (from lars@localhost) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id s83IYNWm015273; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 20:34:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 20:34:23 +0200 From: Lars Engels To: Michelle Sullivan Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool Message-ID: <20140903183422.GF57121@e-new.0x20.net> References: <54052DFA.4030808@freebsd.org> <54053372.6020009@my.hennepintech.edu> <5405890F.8080804@freebsd.org> <20140902125256.Horde.uv31ztwymThxUZ-OYPQoBw1@webmail.df.eu> <5405AE54.60809@sorbs.net> <5407276D.3050200@sorbs.net> <9DAF63F1F61E0FC2F6B237BD@ogg.in.absolight.net> <5407311C.5070903@sorbs.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kb0TSCuX821Ar6UT" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5407311C.5070903@sorbs.net> X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.4 X-Operation-System: FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE-p4 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, pkg@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, Mathieu Arnold X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 18:34:30 -0000 --kb0TSCuX821Ar6UT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 05:17:48PM +0200, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > +--On 3 septembre 2014 16:36:29 +0200 Michelle Sullivan > > wrote: > > | Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > |> I still don't see what you have to say about what EOL mean, it's *En= d Of > > |> Life* meaning after, it is dead, and won't exist any more. > > |>=20 > > |> =20 > > | Ahh so all those Windows XP servers are dead and don't work anymore... > > > > Not at all, but you don't update them any more. > > > > =20 > Actually you do, but it does nothing... just like freebsd-update on any > EOL release... >=20 > Microsoft didn't release a patch that would change the base system so > you can no longer install any software... They just stopped providing > updates, then later stopped providing security updates. Same for FreeBSD and pkg_*. Stay with status quo, use pkg_* with the last tagged version of the ports tree that works with pkg_* or switch to pkg and be happy like the rest of us. --kb0TSCuX821Ar6UT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJUB18uXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4RjQwMDE3RTRERjUzMTI1N0FGRTUxNDlF NTRDQjM3RDNBMDg5RDZEAAoJEOVMs306CJ1tabsIAJ4weLg9YkfoV0bYtgERt7OY MrjOmHOsUZpeZ+7AN4FuTgDHXr1ilhC9rrp3tYdsKYRrUjJZZAaaHYS36fmJbFfU fvHrMVJ+v/RD0untC6rS/uBIrYxBsSG8xUtlTNlFeOuiXgFYEHxF1drTCt9SkK2w +X6XTOms5ynCNZIYG+UnX86a0yV63Emy8XDpDGtEYAaQcm7B5M3RAUzIrxz1YcaD mNDHPz8ow2cnSrZ61dT3akPqxJXdlYtRonDRKu2+3nrmqytq0gU160yMuY5Ewdmu j9ZpcEXPjfge8GvRAjRUvScSB1OxdpB4agcOX+G9ZQwdaJeJMaLWsxaTe/+3Tls= =jMHl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kb0TSCuX821Ar6UT-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 18:58:19 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 326BF498 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 18:58:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1027B13CC for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 18:58:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s83IwIIU037560 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 18:58:18 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from bdrewery@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id s83IwIVO037559 for ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 18:58:18 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery) Received: (qmail 90145 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2014 13:58:16 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.0.24?) (freebsd@shatow.net@10.10.0.24) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 3 Sep 2014 13:58:16 -0500 Message-ID: <5407649A.80500@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 13:57:30 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin , Tijl Coosemans Subject: Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903145614.158f8e89@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140903135029.GK63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903165622.3bff54e0@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140903150018.GL63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20140903150018.GL63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> OpenPGP: id=6E4697CF; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan2.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RBbOvr7EB5b2OgOFL5v2G5Vd1tqieaU6L" Cc: ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 18:58:19 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --RBbOvr7EB5b2OgOFL5v2G5Vd1tqieaU6L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 9/3/2014 10:00 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 04:56:22PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 15:50:30 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 02:56:14PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >>>> On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:25:39 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>>>> On of the most borring thing IMHO in the plist maintainance is all = the >>>>> directories. >>>> >>>> Another idea is to support shell glob patterns (*?[) in pkg-plist. = This >>>> is possible now thanks to staging. It would allow moving PORTDOCS, >>>> PORTDATA and PORTEXAMPLES to pkg-plist. But more importantly, it wo= uld >>>> allow automatic plists that some ports create in post-install to be >>>> turned back into a real pkg-plist. Without glob patterns some pkg-p= lists >>>> are just too long or too complicated depending on options. >>> >>> We could also say pack everything that is in that stage directory. >>> >>> The problem is right now I do like static plist because if something >>> fails to build for $reason, that the plist doesn't find a file in the= >>> staging area and we notice quite quickly that something as failed. >>> with autoplist or globbing we do lose this feature and we need to way= >>> deal with it. >>> In anycase we won't make full autoplist because we still need to be >>> able to specify credentials files per files if needed. But glob is >>> really appealing :) >> >> I completely agree :) Files should be listed explicitly if possible, >> but sometimes it's very inconvenient and in these cases some ports >> roll their own autoplist implementations which worse than having a >> static pkg-plist with a few glob patterns. >> >> Moving PORTDOCS etc. to pkg-plist means all package content is listed >> in one file. That will probably simplify check-plist too. >=20 > Right I'll implement globbing (one level not recursive) >=20 > regards, > Bapt >=20 I disagree globbing simplifies check-plist. I see it making it much more complicated. I support autoplist. The point that if something failed to build and is now missing for packaging, yet expected, exists today already. I never have carefully analyzed the build of a port to see if it is building everything I expected down to every file. I trust that if there is an error building something I requested that it will halt the build. Does this make me a bad maintainer? Probably. I'm sure most maintainers do this. It builds, it works, ship it. The "it works" part is obviously skipped by many as well. makeplist now assumes the build is proper, so I'm sure many maintainers do the same. Whatever makeplist (or tinderbox or poudriere the past X years) has been telling them. I've seen only a handful of cases where something didn't build but the build itself passed and hit the plist error. The vast majority of builds do not have this problem. If there is really a file that you are worried won't build, put in a check in post-build to fail if it is missing. Only 1-2 year ago when majority of users were using ports, and not packages, we had the "missing file from build" problem even more so and we survived. When the port just straight installed to /usr/local, nothing did validation of files installed. Evidence for this was when pkg DEVELOPER_MODE came in and we started using poudriere quite often and finding that many ports advertised some file in their plist that did not really exist. If you add globbing, you will get someone using '*' as their entire plist= =2E I strongly believe that autoplist should be the norm for most ports. At work I have been implementing it based on 'make makeplist', and having it auto add in appropriate keywords (not yet upstreamed). This then only requires ensuring DOCSDIR, EXAMPLESDIR are properly set in the Makefile. What might be interesting is an autoplist with glob-like syntax to support sub-packages. So a main package could be everything except =2Edebug, or .h, or man/*. Or each of those prefixed with a keyword specifying with package they are in. I work at an embedded vendor and it would be hugely helpful to be able to easily move symbols, headers, manpages, examples and docs all into 1 or more sub-packages. Doing all of this from bsd.port.mk, optionally, is even better. I really dislike plists as they are today. The argument that having them makes it easy to see what the port installs is bogus. Many don't have pkg-plist because they have PLIST_* or INFO or are missing DOCS/EXAMPLES due to usage of *. Many, such as rubygems and python, have autoplist already. I would like to provide 1 approved way to do autoplist, rather than having the dozens of different implementations that we have today in ports. If you want to see what a package installs, look at the package repository. Pkg has a means to advertise this and we should enable and export it in an efficient way. Portsmon, or Freshports, could potentially feed off this database and display it on their own sites as well. For non-file plist entries such as @exec, these should be in install/upgrade/deinstall scripts. The plist is already a bad place for them. We've been inlining more and more of this and it is far less readable and maintainable in many cases. You have to remember that plist was only born because there was no stagedir (or filemon or install -M). We have a stagedir now. Plist is redundant. Plist maintenance is just busywork for maintainers and portmgr. Orphaned files, leftover files, listed-but-missing, mtree-owned, dependency-owned. All of these go away if we use autoplist. Maintaining ports becomes simpler. Note that I do not propose requiring autoplist, only providing it. If some port has a case where autoplist does not make sense then it does not need to use it. I understand there is fear involved with not having a plist validate everything. Consider that many other package systems do not require a plist to start. --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery --RBbOvr7EB5b2OgOFL5v2G5Vd1tqieaU6L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUB2SaAAoJEDXXcbtuRpfP7R4IAJE5zLdTod9TLo0ywsfopGII m0UQ8KVfRELYXAdMCSu/KJZOhHjWL2O8IsDdNFusWXAax0zCggWfZW0BPNm76+9l AH8xs2ZiDS7qVsYBHgtKH2Z8DybKtZItwJDw3/SMxhllgk+xaLal4/gchFzX97Lm /Z2nsjgF72U8zETbKAkwS3YBpCKeNuQ7m/pOedSLfnpP7+uHjddFCEjZ6PyJKKN5 ZEQxzlnqaOa2I+7gqGRkQL4xHYelyyVohrY3iFay6CIVfLDgiC1nIG2tJgvEgV6x 3/Dr79N7nxKGvaFnZJx6eNb0d6Ph4jr1to6VvABS35H5MucupY3+LQuk4ZqwN7M= =VToZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RBbOvr7EB5b2OgOFL5v2G5Vd1tqieaU6L-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 19:05:53 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9C547CE for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 19:05:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ultra-secure.de (mail.ultra-secure.de [88.198.178.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AB041529 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 19:05:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45047 invoked by uid 89); 3 Sep 2014 19:05:54 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 45042, pid: 45044, t: 0.0714s scanners: attach: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.97.3/m:55/d:19332 Received: from unknown (HELO ?212.71.117.80?) (rainer@ultra-secure.de@212.71.117.80) by mail.ultra-secure.de with ESMTPA; 3 Sep 2014 19:05:54 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool From: Rainer Duffner In-Reply-To: <54073097.6000006@sorbs.net> Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:05:42 +0200 Message-Id: <9C206CE8-6A3B-4B6D-82D9-62B9688DCA32@ultra-secure.de> References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> <54052DFA.4030808@freebsd.org> <54053372.6020009@my.hennepintech.edu> <5405890F.8080804@freebsd.org> <20140902125256.Horde.uv31ztwymThxUZ-OYPQoBw1@webmail.df.eu> <5405AE54.60809@sorbs.net> <1D2B4A91-E76C-43A0-BE75-D926357EF1AF@gmail.com> <5405E4F5.4090902@sorbs.net> <5406BD65.705@digsys.bg> <5406ED34.7090301@sorbs.net> <5406F00C.6090504@digsys.bg> <358B9E99-5E02-47BA-9E30-045986150966@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <540711FF.3050409@sorbs.net> <47F4AAAA-2D88-4F03-8602-880C4B129305@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <54072011.7030800@sorbs.net> <540723EC.5000908@sorbs.net> <54073097.6000006@sorbs.net> To: Michelle Sullivan X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: Tom Evans , "ports@freebsd.org" , freebsd-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 19:05:53 -0000 Am 03.09.2014 um 17:15 schrieb Michelle Sullivan : >=20 >=20 > I learned that the ports tree was being updated so much that things > would break every day in just 580 packages I have. I have to ask, why you had to build from the HEAD of the ports tree = every day? I never do this. I only take the quarterly releases (before, I would = wait for a FreeBSD Release and the accompanying freeze and use that) and = if something doesn=92t build, I try to update only that port (making a = backup) from =84current=93 ports tree. Still, if you absolutely need pkg_*, you=92ve either got to backport = every single port to use pkg_* again or upgrade the servers that use it = to pkg. I admit it=92s a big task, if you have many servers - but the effort is = well worth it IMO because upgrading packages with anything but pkg is a = nightmare. For me, the EOL of the pkg_* tools was never a concern, so I never read = the announcements that closely. Maybe someone can pull out the old mails and tell if they actually = spelled out that you can=92t even build ports anymore if you don=92t = have pkg installed. I can say that there is no chance we would be using FreeBSD anymore here = at all if it didn=92t have pkg! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 19:13:05 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78B3BDE2 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 19:13:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtprelay06.ispgateway.de (smtprelay06.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 348BE1792 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 19:13:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [89.182.186.231] (helo=localhost) by smtprelay06.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1XPFzF-0001Gx-Ak for ports@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 21:12:57 +0200 Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:12:56 +0200 From: Marcus von Appen To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life Message-ID: <20140903191256.GB1025@medusa.sysfault.org> Reply-To: Marcus von Appen Mail-Followup-To: ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903145614.158f8e89@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140903135029.GK63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903165622.3bff54e0@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140903150018.GL63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <5407649A.80500@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5407649A.80500@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Df-Sender: MTEyNTc0Mg== X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 19:13:05 -0000 --NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On, Wed Sep 03, 2014, Bryan Drewery wrote: [...] > I really dislike plists as they are today. The argument that having them > makes it easy to see what the port installs is bogus. Many don't have > pkg-plist because they have PLIST_* or INFO or are missing DOCS/EXAMPLES > due to usage of *. Many, such as rubygems and python, have autoplist > already. I would like to provide 1 approved way to do autoplist, rather > than having the dozens of different implementations that we have today > in ports. [...] > I understand there is fear involved with not having a plist validate > everything. Consider that many other package systems do not require a > plist to start. [...] Seconded. In my opinion for 95% of all cases it sums up to: everything in the staging directory gets installed. We can use post-build or pre-install to clean up the staging directory where necessary, or even revert the plist meaning in the worst case, e.g. everything in ${EXCLUDE_INSTALL} is not to be installed, if necessary. It'd greatly reduce the maintenance efforts and ugly hacks (look at python.mk for an example) to work around the limitations of plist and upstream solutions. Cheers Marcus --NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlQHaDgACgkQi68/ErJnpkclrwCgrjRIB7nVl9mHEgBQGK3+5JpV pcYAoM1g+wWco97LbaPiqH+SyaCkhJCP =JcOo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 19:17:46 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 547D7F2C; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 19:17:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x22b.google.com (mail-la0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A50AB17E7; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 19:17:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f43.google.com with SMTP id ty20so10554776lab.30 for ; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 12:17:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=emSqSf/gIN2/Ft7pWBk6tTmozs/6+01fwuMQlxb7WfI=; b=GdXEyeSUmMcpds0AWx2koKOv9O12OqRU6B70QVdUzmaiTCOuOWvurcQm+UcOWrNiwf pZ3iwZMkIpkQwrlvr7rWtqpyfUFp4W+Uj3lgjmFQcm20lSI7380DLOYMod6w2VL4J5mA +JDDFNK/yNp+hOy1DNe+9KAwUaT0SLsMSl9sj8s+GcbAQOfd3lEdNK2sahog3EFS6XRs 9Ad23f9hRSI6QqiEQMsaG7Kvm8lN1D4ZPqIS+6yopRhW/y+bR8YcM5tlSi41KCgIw+fe mkUymKEahv6pBGZ2HpH2MPH2XpLxJM2BBpnvuTFZcbUYa7f0H5GsGtIkXTouI0b4/TGr YHkQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.115.232 with SMTP id jr8mr30823263lab.69.1409771863353; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 12:17:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.19.40 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 12:17:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 12:17:43 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: tmux backspace patch? From: Patrick To: =?UTF-8?Q?Olivier_Cochard=2DLabb=C3=A9?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML , gahr@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 19:17:46 -0000 On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Olivier Cochard-Labb=C3=A9 wrote: > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Patrick wrote: > >> Hi, there: >> >> >> I was just wondering about the backspace patch for tmux. Since upgrading >> to >> tmux 1.9a (from 1.8) where this patch is unconditionally applied, my >> backspace key no longer works in the tmux command prompt (e.g. :). = I >> had to remove the patch and manually rebuild to get it to work. I'm just >> wondering what purpose this patch serves? I don't really understand what >> this patch is doing, but I see from Google searching that I'm not the on= ly >> one to have the exact same issue with this patch. >> >> > Hi, > I've the same regression: I need to use shift + backspace > > now. > Maybe the port owner could clarify who benefits from this patch and how? I still don't understand how it makes anything better, but perhaps there's some environment in which it does address an issue. Though since it breaks other environments, I'd propose it be brought back as a port option. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 19:53:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 357326E2; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 19:53:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (hades.sorbs.net [67.231.146.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14C961BF7; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 19:53:11 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0NBC0043XCR2EV00@hades.sorbs.net>; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 12:57:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-id: <540771A4.20600@sorbs.net> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 21:53:08 +0200 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: Rainer Duffner Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool References: <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> <54052DFA.4030808@freebsd.org> <54053372.6020009@my.hennepintech.edu> <5405890F.8080804@freebsd.org> <20140902125256.Horde.uv31ztwymThxUZ-OYPQoBw1@webmail.df.eu> <5405AE54.60809@sorbs.net> <1D2B4A91-E76C-43A0-BE75-D926357EF1AF@gmail.com> <5405E4F5.4090902@sorbs.net> <5406BD65.705@digsys.bg> <5406ED34.7090301@sorbs.net> <5406F00C.6090504@digsys.bg> <358B9E99-5E02-47BA-9E30-045986150966@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <540711FF.3050409@sorbs.net> <47F4AAAA-2D88-4F03-8602-880C4B129305@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <54072011.7030800@sorbs.net> <540723EC.5000908@sorbs.net> <54073097.6000006@sorbs.net> <9C206CE8-6A3B-4B6D-82D9-62B9688DCA32@ultra-secure.de> In-reply-to: <9C206CE8-6A3B-4B6D-82D9-62B9688DCA32@ultra-secure.de> Cc: Tom Evans , "ports@freebsd.org" , freebsd-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 19:53:12 -0000 Rainer Duffner wrote: > > Am 03.09.2014 um 17:15 schrieb Michelle Sullivan >: >> >> >> I learned that the ports tree was being updated so much that things >> would break every day in just 580 packages I have. > > > > I have to ask, why you had to build from the HEAD of the ports tree > every day? Go read it again and you'll find that question was answered in my last email. -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 21:07:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DE3ED2C for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:07:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CC621595 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:07:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s83L7CwU080169 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:07:12 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from bdrewery@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id s83L7C7r080167 for ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:07:12 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery) Received: (qmail 14394 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2014 16:07:07 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.0.24?) (freebsd@shatow.net@10.10.0.24) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 3 Sep 2014 16:07:07 -0500 Message-ID: <540782CD.3090206@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:06:21 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin , Tijl Coosemans Subject: Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903145614.158f8e89@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140903135029.GK63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903165622.3bff54e0@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140903150018.GL63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <5407649A.80500@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <5407649A.80500@FreeBSD.org> OpenPGP: id=6E4697CF; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan2.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0qpt6daiW0AlcnhPiRuP3sbaQFGELTSTc" Cc: ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 21:07:12 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --0qpt6daiW0AlcnhPiRuP3sbaQFGELTSTc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 9/3/2014 1:57 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > What might be interesting is an autoplist with glob-like syntax to > support sub-packages. So a main package could be everything except > .debug, or .h, or man/*. Or each of those prefixed with a keyword > specifying with package they are in. It may be tricky to handle the current ignore mechanism of @comment. I laid out ideas for this before. Here is my previous proposal which had separate plist files for sub-packages. The general idea could be adapted to other ways of specifying patterns/lists for sub-packages though: All plists are packaged and then anything leftover is packaged into the main package assuming there is not a plist for it specifying what to install. Orphans would only be things not in any plist. So if you specify a main plist then you are forbidden to have orphans, not specifying a plist would have no orphans as everything is installed from stagedir. 1. No plists =3D everything in STAGEDIR is automatically added to a plist= =2E (I suppose this ignores all the cruft in Mk/* that adds to plists) 2. pkg-plist =3D "main" plist, If you only have this file then any orphan= s are fatal. 3. pkg-plist, pkg-plist.docs, main package and doc package, any orphan not in one of these plists is fatal. "doc" is arbitrary here, you can have N plists. 4. pkg-plist.ignore contains files not to install and not to consider orphans. One could argue that "ignore" here really should be a subpackage of the ignored files. I.e., why are they ignored? Should it really just be another subpackage? But "ignore" can be a special case to really ignore and not package. This scheme gives us autoplist, a way to ignore orphans you know don't matter, and properly alerts when new files are added in new releases. --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery --0qpt6daiW0AlcnhPiRuP3sbaQFGELTSTc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUB4LNAAoJEDXXcbtuRpfPuroH/AplcA33QotYWBBAX/JUxYhQ N9y9F8PVECOYD8yT2pt60V8dB9jglM8lnIhc4NMvhV9aYqwkRrtAIY39JJbWhFOo XPbxu+lTEZMldMnDdhclJhtXrGnEHyxArV/gp7DJ12cFfiDcxG627QCy0A7ycBRb mDgt7twVdT/DSX2TXHADQ/J5JQpi23oGStV5OgAU37ixRv+d1Ske+QcIc14tOR2r Gbod799yUL67YoVloLzkVXZJkIeXStXsFwy5jd/88ka7AddpXkrnLXhfUbTgVvYQ dl0qMFLoQ8cILbhAbMCugATBaQ61QyWU5mfV7gUF1dC9xUYyVH72GF1BRzkiGAs= =+VP2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0qpt6daiW0AlcnhPiRuP3sbaQFGELTSTc-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 21:13:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECDEFFFD for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server1.cretaforce.gr (server1.cretaforce.gr [88.198.50.249]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "server1.cretaforce.gr", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A959A17A4 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (athedsl-4503341.home.otenet.gr [94.71.163.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by server1.cretaforce.gr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E84D29A323 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 00:13:36 +0300 (EEST) From: Christos Chatzaras Subject: libiconv issue Message-Id: <435AD03D-8F81-49B4-898D-1031DDB1DD71@cretaforce.gr> Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 00:13:43 +0300 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 21:13:48 -0000 I try to portupgrade and I get this error: portupgrade -y phpMyAdmin-4.2.7.1 ---> Session started at: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 21:28:19 +0300 [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 130 packages = found (-0 +0) done] Stale dependency: phpMyAdmin-4.2.7.1 --> libiconv-1.14_4 -- manually run = 'pkgdb -F' to fix, or specify -O to force. ---> Session ended at: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 21:28:20 +0300 (consumed = 00:00:00) In /var/db/pkg I don=92t see the libiconv folder. So looks like is not on my system so I do: cd /usr/ports/converters/libiconv make install clean And it shows: =3D=3D=3D> libiconv-1.14_4 is already installed I then do: make deinstall make reinstall and it says: =3D=3D=3D> Installing for libiconv-1.14_4 =3D=3D=3D> Registering installation for libiconv-1.14_4 But still I can=92t see it on /var/db/pkg Any idea what is wrong? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 21:22:49 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 056B93B5; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:22:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1a.lautre.net (eyra.lautre.net [80.67.160.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.lautre.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4221818CD; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:22:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from graf.pompo.net (graf.pompo.net [78.225.128.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: thierry@pompo.net) by mx1a.lautre.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B39544120F; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 23:22:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: by graf.pompo.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5DEC671E389; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 23:22:43 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 23:22:43 +0200 From: Thierry Thomas To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life Message-ID: <20140903212243.GK63931@graf.pompo.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903145614.158f8e89@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140903135029.GK63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903165622.3bff54e0@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140903150018.GL63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <5407649A.80500@FreeBSD.org> <20140903191256.GB1025@medusa.sysfault.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8GpibOaaTibBMecb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140903191256.GB1025@medusa.sysfault.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-STABLE amd64 Organization: Kabbale Eros X-Face: (hRbQnK~Pt7$ct`!fupO(`y_WL4^-Iwn4@ly-.,[4xC4xc; y=\ipKMNm<1J>lv@PP~7Z<.t KjAnXLs: X-PGP: 0xF1C516B3C8359753 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 21:22:49 -0000 --8GpibOaaTibBMecb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le mer 3 sep 14 =E0 21:12:56 +0200, Marcus von Appen =E9crivait=A0: > On, Wed Sep 03, 2014, Bryan Drewery wrote: > [...] >=20 > > I understand there is fear involved with not having a plist validate > > everything. Consider that many other package systems do not require a > > plist to start. >=20 > [...] >=20 > Seconded. In my opinion for 95% of all cases it sums up to: everything in= the > staging directory gets installed. We can use post-build or pre-install to > clean up the staging directory where necessary, or even revert the plist > meaning in the worst case, e.g. everything in ${EXCLUDE_INSTALL} is not t= o be > installed, if necessary. I disagree. I use plist for two things: - when upgrading a port, I compare the previous plist with the newer one, and if some important files are missing, I try to understand the reason; - I often grep all plists to find which port could possibly provide such header or such library (among non-installed ports, of course). --=20 Th. Thomas. --8GpibOaaTibBMecb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUB4aiXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRFNTM2QkU4NTM4NTM5OUQwMEI2RkFBNzZG MUM1MTZCM0M4MzU5NzUzAAoJEPHFFrPINZdTHT8P/i5G6nE4G4bwIejq8Hi4co+j rJt4MHz8eGL+A82h9oJB34Gd8o7YUmrRUzJFjba/NtHzSWczG6YW2k9tq3Nldl08 CdSC9jkVQJgNT0/Ln1xtSpwdGkpHCta85fVEJlGKFqRMeXB11NknTnBvaj6M5YfX UNfVVEDpS4Q1io1dAh5syOUp4SyEz/uz/V4m1jMY5zwHCuD865ezwwlSKqJmkF2e D2hP+d+BPjyjujOLlIC8XDQqvxBmxQI7gbhY7G6KOy1kxpt0jcPT950AfnfmqewY QJAVRZ2kUiPkjN6Virmdp4qa03Di+aKMMfS65wuH4JeVIYefssnKESEWSZzADIOM WkVki5cYi65xR9dAIgdMPYSXs5ziAqbrqOL8fvICQz0AyaaGGewQJ+lFh3EKXqLQ 3h6gg30Hocddj+Fp9PP7/1O7Ng6/EsmtBfMv9MIlvEc9hdyRh5mN8kaHl6zB30at uj4wSwEGeNMDlZej+NvXbsvPtEZ29HRwxn3dhc+Un8TLDOoLriVlrCu/yZ77a8qE ntETXnuQ4wwjZ3ViYKsTBYrpBqkQIfVg3Znvx5gDmNzjTbhAC0YuFjsPZBZ+7Iwm k1l+buIpy27GD10HZIhz/ewx7abGo7AiK+W9zZDE0yTRHOfJyLYHFDRwh8CBM6YV Ng8KrBamiMdojz9ATwkf =cUuG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8GpibOaaTibBMecb-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 21:32:38 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mandree.no-ip.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2554691 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:32:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost6.localdomain6 [IPv6:::1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51C6F23CE71 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 23:32:36 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <540788F4.30903@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 23:32:36 +0200 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 21:32:38 -0000 Am 03.09.2014 um 10:25 schrieb Baptiste Daroussin: > Hi all, > > On of the most borring thing IMHO in the plist maintainance is all the > directories. > > I have been working on some evolutions I want to share and discuss before making > them official. > > First you have to know that since pkg 1.3 @dirrm and @dirrmtry are equivalent. > > Evolutions: > 1/ stop prepending directories in plist with @dir*: let pkg discover the path > correspond to a directory and handle it as such (easy) > > 2/ make pkg automatically remove directories under PREFIX without the need of > adding them in plist, such as only empty directories and directories not under > PREFIX will have to be listed. Of course pkg will not try to remove directories > owned by another package. > > To achieve the point 2 that will mean we will stop using the mtree inside > packages and create a "hier" package that will have the default hierarchy and > every package but pkg will depend on this hier package (except if PREFIX != > LOCALBASE) > > 2 bonus of this approach: > - it will speed up pkg operation by avoiding to have to extract the mtree for > each package installation > - it will simplify a lot check-plist > > Any opinion here? Note that plist errors are rather rare compared to other error classes, so we might be optimizing prematurely here. I object to 1. I support 2 under the proviso that we tread carefully. I object to globbing in pkg-plist because that totally spoils matching actual build/stage result to expectation. We might have missing files without the builders ever noticing. * I am assuming that directories that pkg installs files into are automatically created and registered, and removed on deinstall. * do not introduce misnomers. @dirrm is not suitable to list empty directories in pkg-plist. It may technically work, but confuses the casual porter -- especially since you know that our documentation is always worse than it could be because people always prefer hacking on software to hacking away on documentation. Something like @dir or @emptydir would work. * make sure that directories remain listed with explicit markup, such as trailing slashes, leading "@dir", "@emptydir" or however. This is to ease maintenance of pkg-plist and that there is no ambiguity. Else an entry of etc/PORTNAME might be a directory, or a file - the pkg-plist should tell me that. I do not want to have to build a port to see if a line describes a directory or a file. * it was mentioned in IRC that in such cases we might need to list links specially as well, but I don't think we need to. It is important if the installed item behaves like a directory and I can tack on pathnames, or if it behaves like a file and represents its contents, or if the installed item is only a placeholder for special behaviour, like socket, named pipe, character/block special, or directory. I know some of these types would be rejected by pkg, but * if you want to auto-remove directories, you may need to implement reference counting in the pkg database so you know when a directory should be empty after deinstalls (as opposed to upgrades). Note that pkg may be unable to distinguish a deinstall from an upgrade, for instance, with portmaster. * On a related note, since it was mentioned on IRC (don't go hunting, this is my conclusion), we may want to introduce a @file escape so as to list files explicitly if their name starts the same as one of our pkg-plist macros. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 21:35:49 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 664C5848 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:35:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F203D19E0 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:35:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mandree.no-ip.org ([78.48.69.16]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MOTRh-1XSL122p9h-005uB3 for ; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 23:35:45 +0200 Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost6.localdomain6 [IPv6:::1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 521F723CE71 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 23:35:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <540789B0.5040808@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 23:35:44 +0200 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903145614.158f8e89@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <20140903145614.158f8e89@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:JCloGSN2e502ik3TPk8TUlQ5YcJ6vVYHsRG16bs+WEt0HYkg3M+ X/sFL29hHAw9BmTIULvRxMf0en48+4CWiAMfIKqe15oRBDt0THD0/xNOA8WQmKJatIOtSRH IZHw+lqxLSOMzzfVdJAEYFId6BVDT9jbon3CBkPWPI8kGYtKS96bGuNBoQgr+sqbrXUFxCj MAu+m8KaK4VM/6nqASHBg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 21:35:49 -0000 Am 03.09.2014 um 14:56 schrieb Tijl Coosemans: > On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:25:39 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> On of the most borring thing IMHO in the plist maintainance is all the >> directories. > > Another idea is to support shell glob patterns (*?[) in pkg-plist. This > is possible now thanks to staging. It would allow moving PORTDOCS, > PORTDATA and PORTEXAMPLES to pkg-plist. But more importantly, it would > allow automatic plists that some ports create in post-install to be > turned back into a real pkg-plist. Without glob patterns some pkg-plists > are just too long or too complicated depending on options. That is a bad idea. We have scripts to generate the pkg-plist to stdout, and something like make makeplist >/tmp/plist.new vim -o pkg-plist /tmp/plist.new works like a breeze for me, meaning it is very easy to maintain the list. With graphical editors that show two files at the same time, or with mouse support in vim, it's even easier to copy and paste entire blocks, for instance, from auto-generated HTML documentation. There is no reason to facilitate throwing away robustness and stability of the package build and listen to complaints about missing files. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 21:46:03 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D942DBA9 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:46:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 553C91ADE for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:46:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mandree.no-ip.org ([78.48.69.16]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lb5nF-1Y96Ze0zZx-00kfH3 for ; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 23:40:43 +0200 Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost6.localdomain6 [IPv6:::1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8127523CE71 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 23:40:42 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <54078ADA.8080805@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 23:40:42 +0200 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903145614.158f8e89@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140903135029.GK63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903165622.3bff54e0@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140903150018.GL63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <5407649A.80500@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <5407649A.80500@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:KxMhItjeOjYACQS5GB+BK+9koo5Wx6Yoo6C9vt0kJtu1KmmBlMs UwEEF9KGhNW/0I4KrKBYTejzmwleqnvBX8jLPte9JCYNZ4La58k69t7yZj9Annc6bh7qEuJ twj4fT2H6NyhmuvH+gHy4W9TNV54E9ZP+qasHCrCyN5fEtkDvHGOCDa5RTwqgijwh7cMuCy zOyKlBXRArGdlCIQjJCDg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 21:46:03 -0000 Am 03.09.2014 um 20:57 schrieb Bryan Drewery: > I support autoplist. The point that if something failed to build and is > now missing for packaging, yet expected, exists today already. I never > have carefully analyzed the build of a port to see if it is building > everything I expected down to every file. I trust that if there is an > error building something I requested that it will halt the build. Does > this make me a bad maintainer? Probably. I'm sure most maintainers do > this. It builds, it works, ship it. The "it works" part is obviously > skipped by many as well. makeplist now assumes the build is proper, so > I'm sure many maintainers do the same. Whatever makeplist (or tinderbox > or poudriere the past X years) has been telling them. I've seen only a > handful of cases where something didn't build but the build itself > passed and hit the plist error. The vast majority of builds do not have > this problem. Please speak only for yourself. I am manually editing plists all the time to avoid astonished users. If some automated build for some script language can be leveraged to reuse their list, that's fine with me, but automatically generating the list from the stage area is too dangerous. I have too often seen ports missing to build features or modules due to some changed API on a requisite port, or a requisite that was no longer found when the requisite was upgraded -- and while the manually-maintained plist does not ward off complaints about missing #ifdef...#endif'd out features due to the same reason, it will at least detect missing files. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 21:53:48 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9429AD56 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:53:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 267B01BE4 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 21:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mandree.no-ip.org ([78.48.69.16]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MXDo1-1Xsppm48Un-00WErR for ; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 23:53:40 +0200 Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost6.localdomain6 [IPv6:::1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BCC723CE71 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 23:53:39 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <54078DE3.30409@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 23:53:39 +0200 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903145614.158f8e89@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140903135029.GK63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903165622.3bff54e0@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140903160908.GO63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903192106.77fecfdf@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <20140903192106.77fecfdf@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:99skIfOtB3i4wXsGFYGTqsI7yAzAoXRz8VEb+IjBEE3mfqaH1u/ ANFLcnNyyn1wGW6i630PfX4H2C7fuM894BdbhF8M9cBnoqUzX6TcgZ1O4O/UG5QaWoc8JZD boUNCExr5u9kmFHvPjPa34mnjhnXKJWaGpJp8Si9y8u+mihkaxwPhaKdv++30LAOE+2TEtb 5gg05iogBWmuEVUtlqGQQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 21:53:48 -0000 Am 03.09.2014 um 19:21 schrieb Tijl Coosemans: > Hmm. Those characters would have to be escaped, just like on the command > line. glob(3) already handles all of that though. > Meaning we start checking all pkg-plists now. I would find it extremely important that a simple "-v" for verbose, or something equivalent, and that is prominently documented everywhere, leads to the system revealing all decisions and findings that it makes for automatisms like glob expansion. Remember that we need to keep things simple for newcomers - and if people show interest in helping with ports, we don't want to confront and turn them away with a system that keeps the user in the dark about what it's doing. I find there's already a lot of magic in pkg going on for daily use where I need to set DEBUG_LEVEL=3 or 4 to understand what it's up to... and that quickly gets unwieldy. Bottom line is, given the tools and helpers we have (make makeplist) we should seriously turn our focus to matters that cause greater pain. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 00:18:38 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2991F56C for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 00:18:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x230.google.com (mail-ie0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBAD11D66 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 00:18:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f176.google.com with SMTP id x19so10740271ier.21 for ; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 17:18:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=BfgMyDYCyefx6Zyvy4j3A+m5J7sLZIpzXPSZtpS1eJc=; b=TtFOrSpnYyg+QueCmY5DC1mmyUAkek3/KFp7o5FDfaD1Z1ieXX5aKqNAm3cdxFozvQ 6QhgC+mE15ngst+eJwzUtDzqCpxbt/pZT8OsWX13rcWRpvNA36tNbP4dQERBfZ3xUtK/ AHYKbfBIik9sgplY01dvxvl5fNv8bYXNgmD49Z46wUapP80vePW6Anpy24w7gnJyZHks rt1hEh1Wlm1FJYF/YsGlh/VZUWj4HQRX0mTbFYouBK4Eh+CeaPd+QlRCDCwOV/noOXqj zYUj7Otd2tWFF8tReiONYZbBP484d4/NIABMXkqkja+K0Sgm7ikra82Q6lMNYcXtEv8l Pilg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.50.175 with SMTP id d15mr880197igo.35.1409789917134; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 17:18:37 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.163.148 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 17:18:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <435AD03D-8F81-49B4-898D-1031DDB1DD71@cretaforce.gr> References: <435AD03D-8F81-49B4-898D-1031DDB1DD71@cretaforce.gr> Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 17:18:37 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: _o0HriQGcmpTysOlbqgYem1tgdc Message-ID: Subject: Re: libiconv issue From: Kevin Oberman To: Christos Chatzaras Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 00:18:38 -0000 On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Christos Chatzaras wrote: > I try to portupgrade and I get this error: > > portupgrade -y phpMyAdmin-4.2.7.1 > ---> Session started at: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 21:28:19 +0300 > [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 130 packages > found (-0 +0) done] > Stale dependency: phpMyAdmin-4.2.7.1 --> libiconv-1.14_4 -- manually run > 'pkgdb -F' to fix, or specify -O to force. > ---> Session ended at: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 21:28:20 +0300 (consumed 00:00:0= 0) > > In /var/db/pkg I don=E2=80=99t see the libiconv folder. > > So looks like is not on my system so I do: > > cd /usr/ports/converters/libiconv > make install clean > > And it shows: > > =3D=3D=3D> libiconv-1.14_4 is already installed > > I then do: > > make deinstall > make reinstall > > and it says: > > =3D=3D=3D> Installing for libiconv-1.14_4 > =3D=3D=3D> Registering installation for libiconv-1.14_4 > > But still I can=E2=80=99t see it on /var/db/pkg > > Any idea what is wrong? > > You don't say whether you are running old pkg_*, but it is not only not supported, but broken, so I suspect that you are now using pkgng which no longer stores data in flat files in /var/db/pkg. portmaster still uses that directory structure and puts distfiles (a pointer to the distfiles, not the files themselves) there, but if you install ports without using portmaster, there will be no entry. Use "pkg info PORT" to get information on ports/packages installed. The data is now in an sqlite DB. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 02:52:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 660E2DC9 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 02:52:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E86E1D58 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 02:52:54 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: , , X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=SrMSGYy0 c=1 sm=1 a=uNsD4W5u/UlQopoDAqU1YA==:17 a=TM20W-5uK7UA:10 a=5k1I9Scu9j0A:10 a=AaUjGI9IrlcA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=OA2lqS22AAAA:8 a=I9Kep0gInM98iNet4AkA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=uNsD4W5u/UlQopoDAqU1YA==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine X-Authed-Username: cm9iZXJ0aHVmZkByY24uY29t Authentication-Results: smtp02.rcn.cmh.synacor.com header.from=roberthuff@rcn.com; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp02.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.mail=roberthuff@rcn.com; spf=neutral; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp02.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.user=roberthuff; auth=pass (PLAIN) Received-SPF: neutral (smtp02.rcn.cmh.synacor.com: 209.6.39.223 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of rcn.com) Received: from [209.6.39.223] ([209.6.39.223:21691] helo=jerusalem.litteratus.org) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.2.43620 r(Platform:3.6.2.0)) with ESMTPA id AF/FF-32522-FF3D7045; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 22:52:48 -0400 Message-ID: <5407D3FF.8010605@rcn.com> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 22:52:47 -0400 From: Robert Huff User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: problem with devel/glib20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 02:52:55 -0000 [I have sent mail to the maintainer, but not heard back. The matter is somewhat pressing, so here I am ....] I'm trying to move from glib-2.36.3_3 to _4. The build appears to go correctly. However, "make install" produces this: ===> Installing for glib-2.36.3_4 ===> glib-2.36.3_4 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python3.3 - found ===> glib-2.36.3_4 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.16.3 - found ===> glib-2.36.3_4 depends on shared library: libpcre.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.3) ===> glib-2.36.3_4 depends on shared library: libffi.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libffi.so.6.0.1) - found (/usr/local/lib/gcc47/libffi.so.4) ===> glib-2.36.3_4 depends on shared library: libintl.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libintl.so.9) ===> glib-2.36.3_4 depends on shared library: libiconv.so.3 - found (/usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3) ===> Checking if glib already installed ===> Registering installation for glib-2.36.3_4 pkg-static: lstat(/data/port-work/usr/ports/devel/glib20/work/stage/usr/local/share/glib-2.0/codegen/__init__.pyc): No such file or directory pkg-static: lstat(/data/port-work/usr/ports/devel/glib20/work/stage/usr/local/share/glib-2.0/codegen/__init__.pyo): No such file or directory pkg-static: lstat(/data/port-work/usr/ports/devel/glib20/work/stage/usr/local/share/glib-2.0/codegen/codegen.pyc): No such file or directory pkg-static: lstat(/data/port-work/usr/ports/devel/glib20/work/stage/usr/local/share/glib-2.0/codegen/codegen.pyo): No such file or directory pkg-static: lstat(/data/port-work/usr/ports/devel/glib20/work/stage/usr/local/share/glib-2.0/codegen/codegen_docbook.pyc): No such file or directory pkg-static: lstat(/data/port-work/usr/ports/devel/glib20/work/stage/usr/local/share/glib-2.0/codegen/codegen_docbook.pyo): No such file or directory pkg-static: lstat(/data/port-work/usr/ports/devel/glib20/work/stage/usr/local/share/glib-2.0/codegen/codegen_main.pyc): No such file or directory pkg-static: lstat(/data/port-work/usr/ports/devel/glib20/work/stage/usr/local/share/glib-2.0/codegen/codegen_main.pyo): No such file or directory pkg-static: lstat(/data/port-work/usr/ports/devel/glib20/work/stage/usr/local/share/glib-2.0/codegen/config.pyc): No such file or directory pkg-static: lstat(/data/port-work/usr/ports/devel/glib20/work/stage/usr/local/share/glib-2.0/codegen/config.pyo): No such file or directory pkg-static: lstat(/data/port-work/usr/ports/devel/glib20/work/stage/usr/local/share/glib-2.0/codegen/dbustypes.pyc): No such file or directory pkg-static: lstat(/data/port-work/usr/ports/devel/glib20/work/stage/usr/local/share/glib-2.0/codegen/dbustypes.pyo): No such file or directory pkg-static: lstat(/data/port-work/usr/ports/devel/glib20/work/stage/usr/local/share/glib-2.0/codegen/parser.pyc): No such file or directory pkg-static: lstat(/data/port-work/usr/ports/devel/glib20/work/stage/usr/local/share/glib-2.0/codegen/parser.pyo): No such file or directory pkg-static: lstat(/data/port-work/usr/ports/devel/glib20/work/stage/usr/local/share/glib-2.0/codegen/utils.pyc): No such file or directory pkg-static: lstat(/data/port-work/usr/ports/devel/glib20/work/stage/usr/local/share/glib-2.0/codegen/utils.pyo): No such file or directory *** Error code 74 Google has no record of anything like this. So: 1) Is this a problem with the port, or is there something I need to reinstall or reconfigure? (I'll take a pointer to the right answer.) 2) Given the system is running: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #1 r264673: Sat Apr 19 09:43:10 EDT 2014 amd64 is there a sanctioned package out there? "pkg install devel/glib20" only gets me _3. Respectfully, Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 06:00:20 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE225632 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 06:00:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtprelay06.ispgateway.de (smtprelay06.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.95]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 339C51FA3 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 06:00:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [89.182.42.172] (helo=localhost) by smtprelay06.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1XPQ5g-0002q9-UU for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 08:00:17 +0200 Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 08:00:11 +0200 From: Marcus von Appen To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life Message-ID: <20140904060011.GB1044@medusa.sysfault.org> Reply-To: Marcus von Appen Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903145614.158f8e89@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140903135029.GK63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903165622.3bff54e0@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140903150018.GL63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <5407649A.80500@FreeBSD.org> <20140903191256.GB1025@medusa.sysfault.org> <20140903212243.GK63931@graf.pompo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Y7xTucakfITjPcLV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140903212243.GK63931@graf.pompo.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Df-Sender: MTEyNTc0Mg== X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 06:00:21 -0000 --Y7xTucakfITjPcLV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On, Wed Sep 03, 2014, Thierry Thomas wrote: > Le mer 3 sep 14 =C3=A0 21:12:56 +0200, Marcus von Appen > =C3=A9crivait=C2=A0: > > > On, Wed Sep 03, 2014, Bryan Drewery wrote: > > > [...] > > > > > I understand there is fear involved with not having a plist validate > > > everything. Consider that many other package systems do not require a > > > plist to start. > > > > [...] > > > > Seconded. In my opinion for 95% of all cases it sums up to: everything = in the > > staging directory gets installed. We can use post-build or pre-install = to > > clean up the staging directory where necessary, or even revert the plist > > meaning in the worst case, e.g. everything in ${EXCLUDE_INSTALL} is not= to be > > installed, if necessary. > > I disagree. I use plist for two things: You belong to the +-5% ;-). > - when upgrading a port, I compare the previous plist with the newer > one, and if some important files are missing, I try to understand the > reason; For those things a comparision mechanism in the qa scripts for a porter/committer might come in handy: - get stagedir contents - get (current) package contents - compare and show a list of changes for the QA > - I often grep all plists to find which port could possibly provide such > header or such library (among non-installed ports, of course). I do the same, but would argue that such a query service should belong to or offered by a pkg search (as sort of counterpart to pkg which). Cheers Marcus --Y7xTucakfITjPcLV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlQH/+sACgkQi68/ErJnpkfX5QCgtbAnZgMAB66kjVcVsqABC8Li wqEAnAgQ63rhJp8qHyVzphAlUhL7/uXA =qPeg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Y7xTucakfITjPcLV-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 06:03:40 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04E767BE for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 06:03:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtprelay06.ispgateway.de (smtprelay06.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.95]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B67FD1084 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 06:03:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [89.182.42.172] (helo=localhost) by smtprelay06.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1XPQ8v-00037h-CN; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 08:03:37 +0200 Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 08:03:36 +0200 From: Marcus von Appen To: Robert Huff Subject: Re: problem with devel/glib20 Message-ID: <20140904060336.GC1044@medusa.sysfault.org> Reply-To: Marcus von Appen Mail-Followup-To: Robert Huff , ports@freebsd.org References: <5407D3FF.8010605@rcn.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5407D3FF.8010605@rcn.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Df-Sender: MTEyNTc0Mg== Cc: ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 06:03:40 -0000 --w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On, Thu Sep 04, 2014, Robert Huff wrote: > [I have sent mail to the maintainer, but not heard back. The matter is > somewhat pressing, so here I am ....] [glib20 + python files installation issue] https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=367216 A fix was committed yesterday (see above), most likely after you tried to build glib20. Can you update to your ports tree and try again? Cheers Marcus --w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlQIALgACgkQi68/ErJnpkcQhwCfZMNHXnLiwZsbPiRHRbF9L3w7 IlsAoKHP8ZwfZX8xvUeph86ZJ2Pduuzd =VZSU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 06:04:24 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6F61863 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 06:04:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpb.telissant.net (smtpb.telissant.net [199.233.230.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B5E810A0 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 06:04:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from barrida.3dresearch.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpb.telissant.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56F127333 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 02:04:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at telissant.net Received: from smtpb.telissant.net ([127.0.0.1]) by barrida.3dresearch.com (barrida.3dresearch.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oxgAQDJmTZEW for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 02:04:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from doncurzio.3dresearch.com (pool-108-3-92-199.pitbpa.east.verizon.net [108.3.92.199]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtpb.telissant.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3402D27369 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 02:04:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from doncurzio.3dresearch.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by doncurzio.3dresearch.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 33C92A1E34 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 02:04:01 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 02:03:54 -0400 From: Janos Dohanics To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Missing /usr/local/lib/libiconv.la Message-Id: <20140904020354.93419a1df81fe154308f0f02@3dresearch.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 06:04:24 -0000 Trying to build/install textproc/libxslt on FreeBSD 8.4-STABLE #0 r264373 amd64: ===> Building for libxslt-1.1.28_4 gmake all-recursive gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/textproc/libxslt/work/libxslt-1.1.28' Making all in libxslt gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/textproc/libxslt/work/libxslt-1.1.28/libxslt' gmake[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/textproc/libxslt/work/libxslt-1.1.28/libxslt' Making all in libexslt gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/textproc/libxslt/work/libxslt-1.1.28/libexslt' CCLD libexslt.la libtool: link: cannot find the library `/usr/local/lib/libiconv.la' or unhandled argument `/usr/local/lib/libiconv.la' gmake[2]: *** [libexslt.la] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/textproc/libxslt/work/libxslt-1.1.28/libexslt' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/textproc/libxslt/work/libxslt-1.1.28' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 ===> Compilation failed unexpectedly. Try to set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes and rebuild before reporting the failure to the maintainer. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/libxslt. *** Error code 1 Which port is it that installs libiconv.la? Please advise... -- Janos Dohanics From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 06:04:51 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E0B8A0D; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 06:04:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout04.t-online.de (mailout04.t-online.de [194.25.134.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailout00.t-online.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C02D510B8; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 06:04:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fwd33.aul.t-online.de (fwd33.aul.t-online.de [172.20.27.144]) by mailout04.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 0ABDB5A7A97; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 08:04:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.119.33] (VOjJheZVwhiL61s+qz1yaQLDNpiXN-nwfzrpoM7zv3AElts7gv3rO7VGCyFIG67g6M@[84.154.101.219]) by fwd33.t-online.de with (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) esmtp id 1XPQ9u-1vcH200; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 08:04:38 +0200 Message-ID: <540800EE.6070201@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 08:04:30 +0200 From: Stefan Esser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fervent Dissent , ports FreeBSD , x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: x11-drivers/xf86-input-keyboard References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ID: VOjJheZVwhiL61s+qz1yaQLDNpiXN-nwfzrpoM7zv3AElts7gv3rO7VGCyFIG67g6M X-TOI-MSGID: 044822ca-fb93-47ec-8663-d4e0bfa0d61f Cc: pkg@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 06:04:51 -0000 Am 04.09.2014 um 07:42 schrieb Fervent Dissent: > This is the first update I've done since switching to the new xorg. The > first time neither the keyboard or mouse drivers were correctly chosen. Now > the mouse upgraded fine, but the keyboard still defaults to the old xorg > driver. After working on it I confirmed by manually downloading both > versions. My keyboard only worked after 'pkg add > xf86-input-keyboard-1.8.0_2.txz'. The version pkg fetches is 11120kB, the > one I added is 11124kB. I am using all packages on my system. > > Could this be fixed? > > I also tried to build from ports, but that also built the wrong version? I > just wanted to report this incase others have problems. This is caused by your use of the vt console driver with a Unicode keymap containing characters >= 0x100. I have annalyzed this and created a PR with patch for the port: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193192 As a workaround, you may start the X server with a US keyboard by issuing kbdcontrol -l us just before starting X. You'll need to select an appropriate keymap under X, then. Regards, STefan PS: This is a problem with the xorg-input-keyboard port and if it is not fixed within that port, there will be a huge number of users affected, when 10.1 is released. This must be fixed! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 06:21:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9D81DE8 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 06:21:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F8771341 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 06:21:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s846LHmL087222 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 07:21:18 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk s846LHmL087222 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/s846LHmL087222; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none; dkim-atps=neutral Message-ID: <540804DB.5030600@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 07:21:15 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903145614.158f8e89@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140903135029.GK63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903165622.3bff54e0@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140903150018.GL63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <5407649A.80500@FreeBSD.org> <20140903191256.GB1025@medusa.sysfault.org> <20140903212243.GK63931@graf.pompo.net> <20140904060011.GB1044@medusa.sysfault.org> In-Reply-To: <20140904060011.GB1044@medusa.sysfault.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2GkqoOU0qvWNEAXnRkswWhfUHnxlDWLeo" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 06:21:26 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --2GkqoOU0qvWNEAXnRkswWhfUHnxlDWLeo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04/09/2014 07:00, Marcus von Appen wrote: >> - I often grep all plists to find which port could possibly provide su= ch >> > header or such library (among non-installed ports, of course). > I do the same, but would argue that such a query service should belong = to or > offered by a pkg search (as sort of counterpart to pkg which). We've toyed with that idea -- allowing 'pkg search' or similar to search on any file in any package known in the repositories. The biggest problem is that including all that data in the package catalogues would bloat their size by a very large amount. Rather than bloating the catalogues for any use, there was a separate index of files. Not sure whether that's being routinely built on the FreeBSD pkg cluster at the moment -- probably not, as it was only ever experimental, and didn't have any generally available consumers. In many ways, I'd prefer to have this sort of functionality available as a web-app, thus saving users the necessity of downloading megabytes of data about ports / packages they would never use or care about. Needs someone to step up and write that application though. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --2GkqoOU0qvWNEAXnRkswWhfUHnxlDWLeo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUCATdXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATgisP/2GBG+QDIRwpfX0IdnX6hJsC 214VWULXha1vucPOgZlBit6OlH6OxQ9iNrxLUoKjlGdHAK+lQM6mYvk0PoRi80ft XME/tK5+xO24dIhcrC2dfAmEy0UPrvUbVA1HbMYyuG/WrpyM57cr8noLP41yfQdi O+xO34hnns9SUqicXuj2/W6k04gqw/qg9/M392i2K70yVmA8EMu+gilJKZou73c8 lGY9w0N0i0YXW2Tawd6nlgIQ6q1g0Xz1zcp0bJcPeIVKmkrU5RjTjEroW7gRlAVX 2adfIwYIP+nj0YtX7tyKXg7UcLKxrqUsZmuHAEVMKvv9Utxf727CpTZwN9k29oCz krkbk4V8oglvLzWahg6h/0DHI6nC5K4E8uDdkJJcqMEy6sIsfmFFqRVlhzanhJXb LRk1lagO3YYUDp0mqUzAMhQHmHpK7eC02pKY8bLNMTHZ3CNbFIYJBLDIf8K8av+A YDrsirj3ilENNa+DdSSqYb0OqNFcVxEoiC7cvjbqrnz3wos5AcLiGLj6Ji6j0Fhq 7HmKCJ/WPwr3lgmsMJZDrSlpaL1xamdzkeQcHBRqxKsHtaNEr6sSJjlpEOAP2dIA YjxMysOvvkfu2tpp4TP0x/Q8IpRmC4Ot1NYwAtpeUCxOIiA5VWBxTda0sENYZdaF eh+0/kK22kJp8vMrMCxR =Dir5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2GkqoOU0qvWNEAXnRkswWhfUHnxlDWLeo-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 07:12:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 600AF4B3 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 07:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtprelay04.ispgateway.de (smtprelay04.ispgateway.de [80.67.29.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19DFC196E for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 07:12:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [80.67.16.112] (helo=webmailfront02.ispgateway.de) by smtprelay04.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1XPRDh-00034L-BN for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:12:37 +0200 Received: from his1.his.de (his1.his.de [192.124.237.237]) by webmail.df.eu (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:12:37 +0200 Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:12:37 +0200 Message-ID: <20140904091237.Horde.333o5ETImmGIX5gwkO04gA6@webmail.df.eu> From: Marcus von Appen To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903145614.158f8e89@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140903135029.GK63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903165622.3bff54e0@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140903150018.GL63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <5407649A.80500@FreeBSD.org> <20140903191256.GB1025@medusa.sysfault.org> <20140903212243.GK63931@graf.pompo.net> <20140904060011.GB1044@medusa.sysfault.org> <540804DB.5030600@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <540804DB.5030600@FreeBSD.org> Reply-to: mva@freebsd.org User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H5 (6.0.4) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline X-Df-Sender: ZnJlZWJzZEBzeXNmYXVsdC5vcmc= X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 07:12:47 -0000 Matthew Seaman : > On 04/09/2014 07:00, Marcus von Appen wrote: >>> - I often grep all plists to find which port could possibly provide such >>> > header or such library (among non-installed ports, of course). > >> I do the same, but would argue that such a query service should belong to or >> offered by a pkg search (as sort of counterpart to pkg which). > > We've toyed with that idea -- allowing 'pkg search' or similar to search > on any file in any package known in the repositories. The biggest > problem is that including all that data in the package catalogues would > bloat their size by a very large amount. > > Rather than bloating the catalogues for any use, there was a separate > index of files. Not sure whether that's being routinely built on the > FreeBSD pkg cluster at the moment -- probably not, as it was only ever > experimental, and didn't have any generally available consumers. I did not mean it to be offline available, since it becomes outdated too fast. > In many ways, I'd prefer to have this sort of functionality available as > a web-app, thus saving users the necessity of downloading megabytes of > data about ports / packages they would never use or care about. Needs > someone to step up and write that application though. Not necessarily a web app, but a (web) service that's e.g. run somewhere on a pkg builder or proxy and which can be queried by tools as well as web services. If you tell me, how the index looks like, I can give it a quick (prototyping) shot. Cheers Marcus From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 09:27:53 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A8A54D6 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 09:27:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay002.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay002.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC97B1B61 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 09:27:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmUGANwuCFRR8Z/O/2dsb2JhbABZgw1TyHOHVAGBCBd3hAQBBToNDyMQCw4KCSUPKh4GE4hGAa5KkAwBF49NB4RMAQSVboZ9gVyTR4NjOy+CTwEBAQ Received: from 206.159-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.241.159.206]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 04 Sep 2014 11:27:49 +0200 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s849Rm4n001752; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 11:27:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 11:27:47 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans To: Janos Dohanics Subject: Re: Missing /usr/local/lib/libiconv.la Message-ID: <20140904112747.731dbde1@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <20140904020354.93419a1df81fe154308f0f02@3dresearch.com> References: <20140904020354.93419a1df81fe154308f0f02@3dresearch.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 09:27:53 -0000 On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 02:03:54 -0400 Janos Dohanics wrote: > Trying to build/install textproc/libxslt on FreeBSD 8.4-STABLE #0 > r264373 amd64: > > ===> Building for libxslt-1.1.28_4 > gmake all-recursive > gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/textproc/libxslt/work/libxslt-1.1.28' > Making all in libxslt > gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/textproc/libxslt/work/libxslt-1.1.28/libxslt' > gmake[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. > gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/textproc/libxslt/work/libxslt-1.1.28/libxslt' > Making all in libexslt > gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/textproc/libxslt/work/libxslt-1.1.28/libexslt' > CCLD libexslt.la > libtool: link: cannot find the library `/usr/local/lib/libiconv.la' or unhandled argument `/usr/local/lib/libiconv.la' > gmake[2]: *** [libexslt.la] Error 1 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/textproc/libxslt/work/libxslt-1.1.28/libexslt' > gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/textproc/libxslt/work/libxslt-1.1.28' > gmake: *** [all] Error 2 > ===> Compilation failed unexpectedly. > Try to set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes and rebuild before reporting the failure to > the maintainer. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/libxslt. > *** Error code 1 > > Which port is it that installs libiconv.la? > > Please advise... Run "make all-depends-list" in textproc/libxslt and make sure you have the latest version of the ports it lists. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 10:12:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from ptrcrt.ch (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB34AEB6; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 10:12:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 10:12:23 +0000 From: Pietro Cerutti To: Patrick Subject: Re: tmux backspace patch? Message-ID: <20140904101222.GC79658@ptrcrt.ch> Reply-To: gahr@FreeBSD.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gatW/ieO32f1wygP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key: fp="DA6D E106 A5B8 54B8 5DD8 6D49 ADD0 D38E A192 089E"; id="0xA192089E"; get=; get=; User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 10:12:42 -0000 --gatW/ieO32f1wygP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2014-Sep-02, 11:43, Patrick wrote: > Hi, there: Hi, > I was just wondering about the backspace patch for tmux. Since upgrading = to > tmux 1.9a (from 1.8) where this patch is unconditionally applied, my > backspace key no longer works in the tmux command prompt (e.g. :). I have reverted the change in r367254. Thanks for your feedback. --=20 Pietro Cerutti The FreeBSD Project gahr@FreeBSD.org PGP Public Key: http://gahr.ch/pgp --gatW/ieO32f1wygP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUCDsGXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXREQTZERTEwNkE1Qjg1NEI4NUREODZENDlB REQwRDM4RUExOTIwODlFAAoJEK3Q046hkgielsIP/jFa2xrcHpnkPPUC1saJ3IO/ jaGYUCRFm1sSWx2f1uMp3GkF8sjSxqO4ZFogWfuaOsbMjevX7ulHdtsVsI4jZuXy pSW9Zb6PQ4y5Jv2WtjTjQgO4ASGlh7LR6RApETVJiPrR7eVsYOVLQ57q7ZE8Y/ZX c6ZACIZ3feA3x4pfExwjSsfIKpgnxlAXVIC1CvVCunwFH4Bce3HBjUcyJclMQO2r QOC1Ei+6dcl9uJZ33juRwLRfl2EG2DxUPZ2oZ7R+7poe/DgCI+H4FayNwMk2v99+ 74AjLi6DGMwKA1Wv+W+Ivw5x4oSwqFCCH5guADkzqbPrpk+yHwkjxfDw/tVvC3s3 As9hbPg3+bBQNsRLMCWKgianuLu88hbGitwjOSDOKgpqvn2pvzMkiXheKg4BtKw/ YvPUsbGH/XwHkwiKLBmFcZbr6pPRbTnFV/0KyBVsbDauiei3ctHOn+XrpAVI41RW 2KGCmEQcgzVmy3WtPN7KIvzsiD1MvbQuqCbyvDv0S5gCa/w2/iOyhKXJizTR5JVd 6DPmlgfsOFjNIbEjHsBjNFImjSfWyzWBzwZOgrY6TgpsIgndgFddSvRPd6F/Bold civit26urPq06X+YE4w4mZBSMy1nwzkxQ3bEw4SdxvezNycyRxFCrgsUGdg+Fgwz Ds2E5ZCPW88sqmKWCuv5 =ffS4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gatW/ieO32f1wygP-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 10:13:44 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D95FF66 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 10:13:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88FAB10BE for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 10:13:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s84ADiK7005348 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 10:13:44 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id s84ADiog005347; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 10:13:44 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201409041013.s84ADiog005347@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 10:13:44 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 10:13:44 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ sysutils/batmon | 0.6 | 0.8 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ www/groupoffice | 3.7.24 | 6.0.20 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 10:37:50 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E68E523; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 10:37:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay009.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay009.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADCCA136C; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 10:37:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmMGAKhACFRR8Z/O/2dsb2JhbABZgw3RHwGBCRd3hAQBBVYeBRALDgoJJQ8qHgYTGYgtAb5OARePTQeETAWTRIknlSODYzsvgk8BAQE Received: from 206.159-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.241.159.206]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 04 Sep 2014 12:37:41 +0200 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s84AbdjS002068; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:37:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tijl@coosemans.org) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:37:33 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans To: Bryan Drewery Subject: Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life Message-ID: <20140904123733.4e9d2796@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <540782CD.3090206@FreeBSD.org> References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903145614.158f8e89@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140903135029.GK63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903165622.3bff54e0@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140903150018.GL63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <5407649A.80500@FreeBSD.org> <540782CD.3090206@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/by8ulPmGcMU=ZZ+EbGnupx1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 10:37:50 -0000 --Sig_/by8ulPmGcMU=ZZ+EbGnupx1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:06:21 -0500 Bryan Drewery wro= te: > On 9/3/2014 1:57 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > > What might be interesting is an autoplist with glob-like syntax to > > support sub-packages. So a main package could be everything except > > .debug, or .h, or man/*. Or each of those prefixed with a keyword > > specifying with package they are in. >=20 > It may be tricky to handle the current ignore mechanism of @comment. I > laid out ideas for this before. Here is my previous proposal which had > separate plist files for sub-packages. The general idea could be adapted > to other ways of specifying patterns/lists for sub-packages though: >=20 > All plists are packaged and then anything leftover is packaged into > the main package assuming there is not a plist for it specifying > what to install. Orphans would only be things not in any plist. > So if you specify a main plist then you are forbidden to have > orphans, not specifying a plist would have no orphans as everything > is installed from stagedir. >=20 >=20 > 1. No plists =3D everything in STAGEDIR is automatically added to a plist. > (I suppose this ignores all the cruft in Mk/* that adds to plists) > 2. pkg-plist =3D "main" plist, If you only have this file then any orphans > are fatal. > 3. pkg-plist, pkg-plist.docs, main package and doc package, any orphan > not in one of these plists is fatal. "doc" is arbitrary here, you can > have N plists. > 4. pkg-plist.ignore contains files not to install and not to consider > orphans. One could argue that "ignore" here really should be a > subpackage of the ignored files. I.e., why are they ignored? Should > it really just be another subpackage? But "ignore" can be a special > case to really ignore and not package. >=20 > This scheme gives us autoplist, a way to ignore orphans you know don't > matter, and properly alerts when new files are added in new releases. An important type of files to list explicitly are libraries, because you need to know when a library version changes so you can bump PORTREVISION on dependent ports. I don't think it's safe to rely on the pkg repo to give you that information because there may not always be a previous package (for whatever reason). In your proposal either you have autoplist or you list everything. This means that if you have to list some files like libraries you cannot have autoplist. With glob patterns you can have at least a partial autoplist. It is more gradual. This issue would go away of course if we had a 'make dependents' target that rebuilds installed packages that depend on a given port. If this target ran automatically when a library version change was detected there would no longer be a need to bump PORTREVISION. However, this makes the time it takes to update a port (or how many other ports it triggers) unpredictable. For subpackages I would suggest something like: these/files/go into/main/package @subpackage S1 these/will/go into/S1/package @subpackage S2 this/goes/into/S2 @subpackage this/goes/back/into/main It may be convenient to also have a shorthand like the new (owner,group,mode) --Sig_/by8ulPmGcMU=ZZ+EbGnupx1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iF4EAREKAAYFAlQIQPIACgkQfoCS2CCgtiuMagD/WeeZreKGz0w1LnF3ehYm607E PmcKq8IEbTlFer6DbGYA/iFLcjlQRVLriIMA200eOsG/JNOR7VhuXXjhcq1cMP0K =PMBM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/by8ulPmGcMU=ZZ+EbGnupx1-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 11:41:13 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B4562D5 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 11:41:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C78B11B1A for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 11:41:12 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: , , X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=SrMSGYy0 c=1 sm=1 a=uNsD4W5u/UlQopoDAqU1YA==:17 a=TM20W-5uK7UA:10 a=piYi6QxLT8MA:10 a=AaUjGI9IrlcA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=OA2lqS22AAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=9mVxiTv4H6HUsrCTXxoA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=ZZAfTtC2Ym4A:10 a=uNsD4W5u/UlQopoDAqU1YA==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine X-Authed-Username: cm9iZXJ0aHVmZkByY24uY29t Authentication-Results: smtp02.rcn.cmh.synacor.com header.from=roberthuff@rcn.com; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp02.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.mail=roberthuff@rcn.com; spf=neutral; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp02.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.user=roberthuff; auth=pass (PLAIN) Received-SPF: neutral (smtp02.rcn.cmh.synacor.com: 209.6.39.223 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of rcn.com) Received: from [209.6.39.223] ([209.6.39.223:59711] helo=jerusalem.litteratus.org) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.2.43620 r(Platform:3.6.2.0)) with ESMTPA id CB/81-32522-6DF48045; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 07:41:11 -0400 Message-ID: <54084FD5.5060506@rcn.com> Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 07:41:09 -0400 From: Robert Huff User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem with devel/glib20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 11:41:13 -0000 From: Marcus von Appen To: Robert Huff Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 08:03:36 +0200 --w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On, Thu Sep 04, 2014, Robert Huff wrote: >> [glib20 + python files installation issue] > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=367216 > A fix was committed yesterday (see above), most likely after you > tried to build glib20. Can you update to your ports tree and try > again? I can, and I did, and it worked. Winner! Thanks, Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 11:51:51 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 370254FF for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 11:51:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server1.cretaforce.gr (server1.cretaforce.gr [88.198.50.249]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "server1.cretaforce.gr", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E65B41C24 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 11:51:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (athedsl-4391666.home.otenet.gr [79.130.114.226]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by server1.cretaforce.gr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ED9B429A323; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 14:51:41 +0300 (EEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: libiconv issue From: Christos Chatzaras In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 14:51:43 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <8F668757-B9C2-4386-9233-2FBEFAD5FEBB@cretaforce.gr> References: <435AD03D-8F81-49B4-898D-1031DDB1DD71@cretaforce.gr> To: Kevin Oberman X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 11:51:51 -0000 Any idea what I should do to upgrade the ports? libiconv-1.14_4 Name : libiconv Version : 1.14_4 Installed on : Thu Sep 4 14:49:42 EEST 2014 Origin : converters/libiconv Architecture : freebsd:8:x86:64 Prefix : /usr/local Categories : devel converters Maintainer : gnome@FreeBSD.org WWW : http://www.gnu.org/software/libiconv/ Comment : Character set conversion library Options : DOCS : on ENCODINGS : on PATCHES : off Shared Libs provided: libiconv.so.3 libcharset.so.1 Flat size : 2.20MiB Description : This library provides an iconv() implementation, for use on systems which don't have one, or whose implementation cannot convert from/to Unicode. It can convert from any of these encodings to any other, through Unicode conversion. It has also some limited support for transliteration, i.e. when a character cannot be represented in the target character set, it can be approximated through one or several similarly looking characters. libiconv is for you if your application needs to support multiple character encodings, but that support lacks from your system. See either README or website for the list of supported encodings. WWW: http://www.gnu.org/software/libiconv/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 12:32:56 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4139CCA6 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:32:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server1.cretaforce.gr (server1.cretaforce.gr [88.198.50.249]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "server1.cretaforce.gr", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F12BF1FC6 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:32:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (athedsl-4391666.home.otenet.gr [79.130.114.226]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by server1.cretaforce.gr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D787529A323 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 15:32:51 +0300 (EEST) From: Christos Chatzaras Subject: pkg_* tools removal Message-Id: Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 15:32:53 +0300 To: FreeBSD Ports ML Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 12:32:56 -0000 Will the pkg_* tools removed in a later FreeBSD release? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 12:36:45 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3610DB1 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:36:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (mx.catwhisker.org [198.144.209.73]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB1811FF3 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:36:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s84CaW95026433; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 05:36:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id s84CaWkS026432; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 05:36:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 05:36:32 -0700 From: David Wolfskill To: Christos Chatzaras Subject: Re: pkg_* tools removal Message-ID: <20140904123632.GY1286@albert.catwhisker.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="I/wet25DnWlSyk1C" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 12:36:45 -0000 --I/wet25DnWlSyk1C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 03:32:53PM +0300, Christos Chatzaras wrote: > Will the pkg_* tools removed in a later FreeBSD release? > .... They have been (as of stable/10 somewhat prior to r271011, as well as head, of course). Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Taliban: Evil cowards with guns afraid of truth from a 14-year old girl. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --I/wet25DnWlSyk1C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUCFzPXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4RThEMDY4QTIxMjc1MDZFRDIzODYzRTc4 QTY3RjlDOERFRjQxOTNCAAoJEIpn+cje9Bk7w8AP/07OPDpoeKxLHu92lFg8MWWP K39ILvpZT07gMgblIEBK1gGMaKyuLPkTJKtl0NdO87BXd7f1a879C+aWC0cItpaA p5Dlk5fhqC0//wk0NFEHsSVWGbXWyxOaO6CeHJuCMtdxqSAWPUeKPn58xPF/BJio y8l085ZtGRWOi0mcuR4g4v1+fiXaZuo9ZOU+HRSvghWCsAhMHfuJhce45CjXg5o4 H9zm0t5ExGX0GOQgkUPyaA2lQRb8TgnQNIIMO2F4y+Rd3QhtsQl3TYXS1MqniMJv NAa7CEeZ0jd8W1PhtUThqN39OhvnK7t7EVQs2GQGm/MRhU8rw13W3d381IX+Mjr1 qRgILiAkOyr5K1JemAJJsFpCCC+25jSiS18qeLZdCVj0FkMryvl9IapFq0tVzzFp uB56/JK3ZLzdLWB1ZicYd0wrC5CP6Zkw03F2n9D5SS2eP12bN4VmyuCIoEgWTSEB FPodCV1aO5KG2IL7F2ZbSdYKvTqdnBZ2GTdajJvRYTI6o6QMx9TiH3wEFF6sXwh8 2GT+GZgtbb+xNS6KAw0UoE0iRfZAfHVRo9Yb0uklXd5ufcTCS1cGvoRymLnBfhkQ Z6Xt5tXdKx7BH+/TA12cV0Rtx5+qWmveZvHSYzhqCeXOLvpnl7QhQ8gjetM3kLC5 INRofhppbPsFeCWixptK =+ywP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --I/wet25DnWlSyk1C-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 14:09:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7974BBE0 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 14:09:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (hades.sorbs.net [67.231.146.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65BE61CBD for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 14:09:24 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0NBD00619RHW0W00@hades.sorbs.net> for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 07:13:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-id: <5408728B.4000105@sorbs.net> Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 16:09:15 +0200 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: Christos Chatzaras Subject: Re: pkg_* tools removal References: In-reply-to: Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 14:09:25 -0000 Christos Chatzaras wrote: > Will the pkg_* tools removed in a later FreeBSD release? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > They're already unusable. -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 14:48:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3FCBE53; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 14:48:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from qat.redports.org (qat.redports.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6420::233:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8496F1236; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 14:48:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redports.org; s=04012012; h=Sender:Message-Id:To:Subject:Reply-To:Date:To:Cc:From:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=Jht7zxrzL8CgNuV4rt4cwxZldDcn7OWslxc9l6xZipE=; b=HvuqjypXKubo4uHttSoeNm3I8tKU1n2a8WSzVbPgGlujJtjlb3++kHfwQ9ycsdKOcgUlspm0jY3sC5rcvQnGdzSDWME5QxWmvejEy9h/bLWC/eFwZwcPtRwViYxJhf2tEw+HYmbp17H8Q4RuE0z0mBPdkbeEWpM+XU6OE1JeS8E=; Received: from www by qat.redports.org with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1XPYKy-000Bn1-F7; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 14:48:36 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Ports-QAT" X-Trac-Version: 1.0.1 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 1.0.1, by Edgewall Software To: bapt@FreeBSD.org X-Trac-Project: redports Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 14:48:36 -0000 Reply-To: qat@redports.org X-URL: https://qat.redports.org/ Subject: [QAT] 367217: 4x leftovers To: bapt@FreeBSD.org X-Trac-Build-URL: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/20140903163000-869 X-Trac-Build-ID: 20140903163000-869 Message-Id: Sender: World Wide Web Owner Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, decke@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 14:48:37 -0000 Update to 1.4.0-pre-alpha13: Changes: - @owner/@group without var reset to root/wheel - Do not accept @mode with '+-' like u+s or g-w - Integrate kyua with autools (make check now calls kyua) - Fix pkg annotate -y - Fix a regression in pkg_is_valid - Allow keywords define in ucl files '(Keywords/*.ucl)' to consider its argument as a command line argument (aka split it) - Completly ignore mtree - Automatically remove any directory under PREFIX if needed --------------------------------------------------------------------- Build ID: 20140903163000-869 Job owner: bapt@FreeBSD.org Buildtime: 22 hours Enddate: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 14:48:33 GMT Revision: 367217 Repository: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=367217 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Port: ports-mgmt/pkg-devel 1.4.0.p.a13 Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~bapt@FreeBSD.org/20140903163000-869-409190/pkg-devel-1.4.0.p.a13.log Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~bapt@FreeBSD.org/20140903163000-869-409191/pkg-devel-1.4.0.p.a13.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~bapt@FreeBSD.org/20140903163000-869-409192/pkg-devel-1.4.0.p.a13.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~bapt@FreeBSD.org/20140903163000-869-409193/pkg-devel-1.4.0.p.a13.log -- Buildarchive URL: redports From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 15:08:24 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7ECC553E for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 15:08:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpb.telissant.net (smtpb.telissant.net [199.233.230.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50CE6151F for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 15:08:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from barrida.3dresearch.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpb.telissant.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3042227333 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 11:08:23 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at telissant.net Received: from smtpb.telissant.net ([127.0.0.1]) by barrida.3dresearch.com (barrida.3dresearch.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E1IkDwHkYinT for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 11:08:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from doncurzio.3dresearch.com (pool-108-3-92-199.pitbpa.east.verizon.net [108.3.92.199]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtpb.telissant.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA3CF27354 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 11:08:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from doncurzio.3dresearch.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by doncurzio.3dresearch.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 29B00A1E34 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 11:08:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 11:07:45 -0400 From: Janos Dohanics To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Missing /usr/local/lib/libiconv.la Message-Id: <20140904110745.bd87fbe1ca9bbc96e645970d@3dresearch.com> In-Reply-To: <20140904112747.731dbde1@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> References: <20140904020354.93419a1df81fe154308f0f02@3dresearch.com> <20140904112747.731dbde1@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:08:24 -0000 On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 11:27:47 +0200 Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 02:03:54 -0400 Janos Dohanics > wrote: > > Trying to build/install textproc/libxslt on FreeBSD 8.4-STABLE #0 > > r264373 amd64: > > > > ===> Building for libxslt-1.1.28_4 > > gmake all-recursive > > gmake[1]: Entering directory > > `/usr/ports/textproc/libxslt/work/libxslt-1.1.28' Making all in > > libxslt gmake[2]: Entering directory > > `/usr/ports/textproc/libxslt/work/libxslt-1.1.28/libxslt' gmake[2]: > > Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[2]: Leaving directory > > `/usr/ports/textproc/libxslt/work/libxslt-1.1.28/libxslt' Making > > all in libexslt gmake[2]: Entering directory > > `/usr/ports/textproc/libxslt/work/libxslt-1.1.28/libexslt' CCLD > > libexslt.la libtool: link: cannot find the library > > `/usr/local/lib/libiconv.la' or unhandled argument > > `/usr/local/lib/libiconv.la' gmake[2]: *** [libexslt.la] Error 1 > > gmake[2]: Leaving directory > > `/usr/ports/textproc/libxslt/work/libxslt-1.1.28/libexslt' gmake > > [1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory > > `/usr/ports/textproc/libxslt/work/libxslt-1.1.28' gmake: *** [all] > > Error 2 ===> Compilation failed unexpectedly. Try to set > > MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes and rebuild before reporting the failure to > > the maintainer. *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/libxslt. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Which port is it that installs libiconv.la? > > > > Please advise... > > Run "make all-depends-list" in textproc/libxslt and make sure you have > the latest version of the ports it lists. Thank you, "make all-depends-list" was very useful, libxslt-1.1.28_4 is installed, I think upgrading devel/gmake fixed it (although there is still no /usr/local/lib/libiconv.la). -- Janos Dohanics From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 15:24:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E0EDCD9; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 15:24:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from qat.redports.org (qat.redports.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6420::233:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FF3D18C9; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 15:24:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redports.org; s=04012012; h=Sender:Message-Id:To:Subject:Reply-To:Date:To:Cc:From:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=obBSOkWv9K+4+jNNaTVSDUUw9WIr3SN9SSBjMD8fi0Q=; b=hPcavT9FWyHoUCq51hfa0tvxIfGP7ZhLkOnpiU35zQCIL+DCzjpY0imfkh6rjDtaOm1c3Kqz7DHicvkKdbkkYxiIwXz71nfUA0nXuoLkDNLAg0EF2mHrD3GvDQ4fMw9ev3ptC+ieTU0Bd2w2X7VCmScKX5mAiwXF6Vd1eGbMoKM=; Received: from www by qat.redports.org with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1XPYtt-000Eqz-9q; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:24:41 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Ports-QAT" X-Trac-Version: 1.0.1 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 1.0.1, by Edgewall Software To: antoine@FreeBSD.org X-Trac-Project: redports Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:24:41 -0000 Reply-To: qat@redports.org X-URL: https://qat.redports.org/ Subject: [QAT] 367220: 3x leftovers, 1x success To: antoine@FreeBSD.org X-Trac-Build-URL: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/20140903165601-46333 X-Trac-Build-ID: 20140903165601-46333 Message-Id: Sender: World Wide Web Owner Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, decke@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:24:42 -0000 Fix packaging --------------------------------------------------------------------- Build ID: 20140903165601-46333 Job owner: antoine@FreeBSD.org Buildtime: 22 hours Enddate: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:24:38 GMT Revision: 367220 Repository: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=367220 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Port: math/coq 8.4.3,1 Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~antoine@FreeBSD.org/20140903165601-46333-409202/coq-8.4.3,1.log Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~antoine@FreeBSD.org/20140903165601-46333-409203/coq-8.4.3,1.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~antoine@FreeBSD.org/20140903165601-46333-409204/coq-8.4.3,1.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~antoine@FreeBSD.org/20140903165601-46333-409205/coq-8.4.3,1.log -- Buildarchive URL: redports From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 15:27:59 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C0E4E1A; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 15:27:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.jrv.org (rrcs-24-73-246-106.sw.biz.rr.com [24.73.246.106]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6BB18FA; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 15:27:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.jrv.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1FA615198B; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 10:10:37 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail.jrv.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra64.housenet.jrv [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id rX3LinZZcKO9; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 10:10:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.jrv.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A53C8151986; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 10:10:27 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra64.housenet.jrv Received: from mail.jrv.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra64.housenet.jrv [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id pskxlQc3qLyF; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 10:10:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [192.168.138.128] (BMX.housenet.jrv [192.168.3.140]) by mail.jrv.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 827A6151983; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 10:10:27 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <540880D3.6070105@jrv.org> Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 10:10:11 -0500 From: "James R. Van Artsdalen" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.0; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lev@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Splitting devel/subversion into SEVERAL ports -- how fine-grained do we want to see it? References: <1438330868.20140608001618@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <1438330868.20140608001618@serebryakov.spb.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:27:59 -0000 So how does port subversion work now? I don't get mod_dav_svn installed and I don't see a knob for it. There is port www/mod_dav_svn but devel/subversion doesn't seem to reference it, and www/mod_dav_svn just gives errors when apache24 tries to start.(needs shared memory support that or some such). port devel/subversion does have the mod_dav_svn code in the work tree; it just isn't installed. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 16:33:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06F26D41 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:33:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpb.telissant.net (smtpb.telissant.net [199.233.230.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6E041268 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:33:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from barrida.3dresearch.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpb.telissant.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D71D427342 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:33:37 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at telissant.net Received: from smtpb.telissant.net ([127.0.0.1]) by barrida.3dresearch.com (barrida.3dresearch.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G1ELThl1twnQ for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:33:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from doncurzio.3dresearch.com (pool-108-3-92-199.pitbpa.east.verizon.net [108.3.92.199]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtpb.telissant.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 091F027381 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:33:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from doncurzio.3dresearch.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by doncurzio.3dresearch.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DC8CA1E34 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:33:17 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:32:53 -0400 From: Janos Dohanics To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: net/ntop strip: ... Invalid operation Message-Id: <20140904123253.3ce66f73b13e27196ea55c04@3dresearch.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 16:33:39 -0000 I'm trying to build and install net/ntop and getting this error (FreeBSD 8.4-STABLE #0 r264373 amd64): ===> Generating temporary packing list CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/sh ./missing --run echo -I m4 -I m4 cd . && /bin/sh ./missing --run echo --gnu --gnu CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/sh ./missing --run echo if test -z 'strip'; then \ gmake INSTALL_PROGRAM="/bin/sh /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop-5.0.1/install-sh -c -s" \ install_sh_PROGRAM="/bin/sh /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop-5.0.1/install-sh -c -s" INSTALL_STRIP_FLAG=-s \ install; \ else \ gmake INSTALL_PROGRAM="/bin/sh /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop-5.0.1/install-sh -c -s" \ install_sh_PROGRAM="/bin/sh /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop-5.0.1/install-sh -c -s" INSTALL_STRIP_FLAG=-s \ "INSTALL_PROGRAM_ENV=STRIPPROG='strip'" install; \ fi gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop-5.0.1' CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/sh ./missing --run echo -I m4 -I m4 cd . && /bin/sh ./missing --run echo --gnu --gnu CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/sh ./missing --run echo Making install in . gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop-5.0.1' CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/sh ./missing --run echo -I m4 -I m4 cd . && /bin/sh ./missing --run echo --gnu --gnu CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/sh ./missing --run echo gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop-5.0.1' CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/sh ./missing --run echo -I m4 -I m4 cd . && /bin/sh ./missing --run echo --gnu --gnu CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/sh ./missing --run echo /bin/mkdir -p '/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/stage/usr/local/lib' /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=install /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel -s libntop.la libntopreport.la '/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/stage/usr/local/lib' libtool: install: /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel .libs/libntop-5.0.1.so /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/stage/usr/local/lib/libntop-5.0.1.so libtool: install: strip --strip-unneeded /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/stage/usr/local/lib/libntop-5.0.1.so libtool: install: (cd /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/stage/usr/local/lib && { ln -s -f libntop-5.0.1.so libntop.so || { rm -f libntop.so && ln -s libntop-5.0.1.so libntop.so; }; }) libtool: install: /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel .libs/libntop.lai /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/stage/usr/local/lib/libntop.la libtool: install: warning: relinking `libntopreport.la' libtool: install: (cd /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop-5.0.1; /bin/sh /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop-5.0.1/libtool --tag CC --mode=relink cc -g -O2 -pipe -I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -I/opt/local/include -g -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -I /usr/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/local/include/python2.7 -I/usr/local/include/python2.7 -fno-strict-aliasing -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -release 5.0.1 -export-dynamic -L/usr/local/lib -pthread -Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib-L/usr/local/lib -L/opt/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/lib -o libntopreport.la -rpath /usr/local/lib emitter.lo globals-report.lo graph.lo httpd.lo report.lo reportUtils.lo ssl_utils.lo webInterface.lo map.lo python.lo libntop.la -lpthread -lc -lcrypt -lssl -lcrypto -lgdbm -lz -L/usr/local/lib -lintl -lutil -lm -lpython2.7 -lGeoIP -L/usr/lib -lpcap -L/usr/local/lib -lrrd_th ./nDPI/src/ lib/.libs/libndpi.a -inst-prefix-dir /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/stage) *** Warning: Linking the shared library libntopreport.la against the *** static library ./nDPI/src/lib/.libs/libndpi.a is not portable! libtool: relink: cc -shared -fPIC -DPIC .libs/emitter.o .libs/globals-report.o .libs/graph.o .libs/httpd.o .libs/report.o .libs/reportUtils.o .libs/ssl_utils.o .libs/webInterface.o .libs/map.o .libs/python.o -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/opt/local/lib -L/usr/lib ./.libs/libntop.so -lpthread -lcrypt -lssl -lcrypto /usr/local/lib/libgdbm.so -lz /usr/local/lib/libintl.so -lutil -lm -lpython2.7 -lGeoIP -lpcap -lrrd_th ./nDPI/src/lib/.libs/libndpi.a -O2 -O2 -pthread -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib-L/usr/local/lib -pthread -Wl,-soname -Wl,libntopreport-5.0.1.so -o .libs/libntopreport-5.0.1.so libtool: install: /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel .libs/libntopreport-5.0.1.soT /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/stage/usr/local/lib/libntopreport-5.0.1.so libtool: install: strip --strip-unneeded /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/stage/usr/local/lib/libntopreport-5.0.1.so libtool: install: (cd /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/stage/usr/local/lib && { ln -s -f libntopreport-5.0.1.so libntopreport.so || { rm -f libntopreport.so && ln -s libntopreport-5.0.1.so libntopreport.so; }; }) libtool: install: /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel .libs/libntopreport.lai /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/stage/usr/local/lib/libntopreport.la libtool: install: /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel .libs/libntop.a /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/stage/usr/local/lib/libntop.a libtool: install: strip --strip-debug /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/stage/usr/local/lib/libntop.a strip: /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/stage/usr/local/lib/stcf7kmO/libndpi.a: Invalid operation gmake[3]: *** [install-libLTLIBRARIES] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop-5.0.1' gmake[2]: *** [install-am] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop-5.0.1' gmake[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop-5.0.1' gmake: *** [install-strip] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/net/ntop. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/ntop. I understand that net/ntop is unmaintained, but someone perhaps still could advise... -- Janos Dohanics From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 17:19:13 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38F165A6 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 17:19:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tensor.andric.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:1:2d0:b7ff:fea0:8c26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "tensor.andric.com", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9D63192B for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 17:19:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7::a5eb:c5ff:60c6:7944] (unknown [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:a5eb:c5ff:60c6:7944]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 740A4B803; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 19:19:08 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_13EE7DC0-0FFE-489B-B031-208CC629995F"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: libiconv issue From: Dimitry Andric In-Reply-To: <435AD03D-8F81-49B4-898D-1031DDB1DD71@cretaforce.gr> Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 19:18:48 +0200 Message-Id: References: <435AD03D-8F81-49B4-898D-1031DDB1DD71@cretaforce.gr> To: Christos Chatzaras X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 17:19:13 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_13EE7DC0-0FFE-489B-B031-208CC629995F Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 On 03 Sep 2014, at 23:13, Christos Chatzaras = wrote: > I try to portupgrade and I get this error: >=20 > portupgrade -y phpMyAdmin-4.2.7.1 > ---> Session started at: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 21:28:19 +0300 > [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 130 = packages found (-0 +0) done] > Stale dependency: phpMyAdmin-4.2.7.1 --> libiconv-1.14_4 -- manually = run 'pkgdb -F' to fix, or specify -O to force. > ---> Session ended at: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 21:28:20 +0300 (consumed = 00:00:00) Have you tried running 'pkgdb -F' ? -Dimitry --Apple-Mail=_13EE7DC0-0FFE-489B-B031-208CC629995F Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAlQInwoACgkQsF6jCi4glqOZYQCgv367lLYHp59WfNZYBg4ayjOq J3MAoPj562CXCrMxxX6G0D5LkcSl/p9U =K8St -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_13EE7DC0-0FFE-489B-B031-208CC629995F-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 17:21:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18CAB949; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 17:21:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from qat.redports.org (qat.redports.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6420::233:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF938195F; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 17:21:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redports.org; s=04012012; h=Sender:Message-Id:To:Subject:Reply-To:Date:To:Cc:From:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=1pdhLgWiUE3QR0eflMNjm6TEj9XU1DU/7lJGL3XW2OY=; b=i3LY5RRDpRicMLofZsPYm0+TULCiyUlOX/pyvvMvFqvOYWx+3z/WL0WW6KQNcRrmHS3A0zd0K/+VmqIIO3J6vyCfK07FNW7BoC1ojoVncLacxMOwhtn4kTanZHYNwFEcO3Kfj0OPJZKe/GE7LtUYFUGCDV5B5dABoLyKwH5V3rQ=; Received: from www by qat.redports.org with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1XPaiZ-000OCu-S9; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 17:21:07 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Ports-QAT" X-Trac-Version: 1.0.1 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 1.0.1, by Edgewall Software To: danfe@FreeBSD.org X-Trac-Project: redports Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 17:21:07 -0000 Reply-To: qat@redports.org X-URL: https://qat.redports.org/ Subject: [QAT] 367275: 4x leftovers, 8x success To: danfe@FreeBSD.org X-Trac-Build-URL: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/20140904145800-63014 X-Trac-Build-ID: 20140904145800-63014 Message-Id: Sender: World Wide Web Owner Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, decke@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 17:21:09 -0000 Make descriptions for TTA (The True Audio) lossless audio and TooLAME MP2 audio encoder shared and thus remove them from some ports' Makefiles. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Build ID: 20140904145800-63014 Job owner: danfe@FreeBSD.org Buildtime: 2 hours Enddate: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 17:21:03 GMT Revision: 367275 Repository: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=367275 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Port: audio/pacpl 5.0.1_11 Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~danfe@FreeBSD.org/20140904145800-63014-409442/pacpl-5.0.1_11.log Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~danfe@FreeBSD.org/20140904145800-63014-409443/pacpl-5.0.1_11.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~danfe@FreeBSD.org/20140904145800-63014-409444/pacpl-5.0.1_11.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~danfe@FreeBSD.org/20140904145800-63014-409445/pacpl-5.0.1_11.log --------------------------------------------------------------------- Port: audio/shntool 3.0.10 Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~danfe@FreeBSD.org/20140904145800-63014-409446/shntool-3.0.10.log Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~danfe@FreeBSD.org/20140904145800-63014-409447/shntool-3.0.10.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~danfe@FreeBSD.org/20140904145800-63014-409448/shntool-3.0.10.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: SUCCESS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~danfe@FreeBSD.org/20140904145800-63014-409449/shntool-3.0.10.log --------------------------------------------------------------------- Port: audio/soundkonverter 2.1.1_3 Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~danfe@FreeBSD.org/20140904145800-63014-409450/soundkonverter-2.1.1_3.log Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~danfe@FreeBSD.org/20140904145800-63014-409451/soundkonverter-2.1.1_3.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~danfe@FreeBSD.org/20140904145800-63014-409452/soundkonverter-2.1.1_3.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~danfe@FreeBSD.org/20140904145800-63014-409453/soundkonverter-2.1.1_3.log -- Buildarchive URL: redports From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 18:17:54 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0387399B; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 18:17:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from qat.redports.org (qat.redports.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6420::233:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C82C91111; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 18:17:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redports.org; s=04012012; h=Sender:Message-Id:To:Subject:Reply-To:Date:To:Cc:From:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=1sWVybqKmR4uVI8FFdxvi3iAKz2tZ+wO3S01pJG2l6M=; b=KPnxa5i/MfmX0c+w1gJ3AcdCQVbSdlgAqSH892kkrIbo3/1zlw6EGyZeWbq2pRaGzpbjDTqJ1bVjvLPU77+5azqB3cjqqG0+ILvqsq+NwTwaKRX5J2TzaKQ3XdvrJobR2cDxn0NByarUWF0ECFYAVXUV7ToxwSb8CQZGHyZ9JEw=; Received: from www by qat.redports.org with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1XPbbU-0002os-Rk; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 18:17:52 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Ports-QAT" X-Trac-Version: 1.0.1 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 1.0.1, by Edgewall Software To: kmoore@FreeBSD.org X-Trac-Project: redports Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 18:17:52 -0000 Reply-To: qat@redports.org X-URL: https://qat.redports.org/ Subject: [QAT] 367292: 1x leftovers, 2x depend (??? in graphics/netpbm), 1x ignored: is only for amd64, while you are running i386 To: kmoore@FreeBSD.org X-Trac-Build-URL: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/20140904170800-65260 X-Trac-Build-ID: 20140904170800-65260 Message-Id: Sender: World Wide Web Owner Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, decke@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 18:17:54 -0000 Opps, remove restriction to FBSD 10.0 and later Pointy Hat: kmoore --------------------------------------------------------------------- Build ID: 20140904170800-65260 Job owner: kmoore@FreeBSD.org Buildtime: 70 minutes Enddate: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 18:17:51 GMT Revision: 367292 Repository: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=367292 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Port: x11/lumina 0.6.2.1409847349,1 Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: DEPEND (??? IN GRAPHICS/NETPBM) Log: https://qat.redports.org//~kmoore@FreeBSD.org/20140904170800-65260-409518/netpbm-10.35.92_1.log Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: DEPEND (??? IN GRAPHICS/NETPBM) Log: https://qat.redports.org//~kmoore@FreeBSD.org/20140904170800-65260-409519/netpbm-10.35.92_1.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~kmoore@FreeBSD.org/20140904170800-65260-409520/lumina-0.6.2.1409847349,1.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: IGNORED: IS ONLY FOR AMD64, WHILE YOU ARE RUNNING I386 -- Buildarchive URL: redports From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 18:21:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D40AAC6D for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 18:21:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B1FC120D for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 18:21:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s84IKlHh005831 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 19:20:51 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=infracaninophile.co.uk DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk s84IKlHh005831 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1409854852; bh=pMXM4qNZixv2/0EPR1HtxTb+LcKHk4VrHs/7OcQ+uiY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; z=Date:=20Thu,=2004=20Sep=202014=2019:20:44=20+0100|From:=20Matthew =20Seaman=20|To:=20freebsd-ports@ freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20[BRAINSTORMING]=20simplifying=20maint ainer's=20life|References:=20<20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoil ebsd.net>=20<20140903145614.158f8e89@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>= 20<20140903135029.GK63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>=20<20140903165622 .3bff54e0@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>=20<20140903150018.GL63085@i valdir.etoilebsd.net>=20<5407649A.80500@FreeBSD.org>=20<2014090319 1256.GB1025@medusa.sysfault.org>=20<20140903212243.GK63931@graf.po mpo.net>=20<20140904060011.GB1044@medusa.sysfault.org>=20<540804DB .5030600@FreeBSD.org>=20<20140904091237.Horde.333o5ETImmGIX5gwkO04 gA6@webmail.df.eu>|In-Reply-To:=20<20140904091237.Horde.333o5ETImm GIX5gwkO04gA6@webmail.df.eu>; b=qw/3zPNmPwmFl5fpUMKBZdbKJMLkzsQpq7caQRUjBq3y3BLkhNuQBI8yhPJ7VOcWO M2oi3VSbIREcK45U9t7A35YQv36h9x7L9lSePpG+JPN82iOjiGrPM25QhuWZRkj/Sa pzCPKVdU/0b1k7IwwozZqEyINpuGMKFs/+umv1g0= Message-ID: <5408AD7C.4030809@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 19:20:44 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903145614.158f8e89@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140903135029.GK63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140903165622.3bff54e0@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140903150018.GL63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <5407649A.80500@FreeBSD.org> <20140903191256.GB1025@medusa.sysfault.org> <20140903212243.GK63931@graf.pompo.net> <20140904060011.GB1044@medusa.sysfault.org> <540804DB.5030600@FreeBSD.org> <20140904091237.Horde.333o5ETImmGIX5gwkO04gA6@webmail.df.eu> In-Reply-To: <20140904091237.Horde.333o5ETImmGIX5gwkO04gA6@webmail.df.eu> OpenPGP: id=E1ECF9BB Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nWIbr1vmk1AipmJbNoJdG4jmqJWrqefwl" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 18:21:02 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --nWIbr1vmk1AipmJbNoJdG4jmqJWrqefwl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04/09/2014 08:12, Marcus von Appen wrote: >> In many ways, I'd prefer to have this sort of functionality available = as >> a web-app, thus saving users the necessity of downloading megabytes of= >> data about ports / packages they would never use or care about. Needs= >> someone to step up and write that application though. >=20 > Not necessarily a web app, but a (web) service that's e.g. run somewher= e > on a > pkg builder or proxy and which can be queried by tools as well as web > services. >=20 > If you tell me, how the index looks like, I can give it a quick > (prototyping) shot. See pkg-repo(8), specifically the -l or --list-files option. If you just stick a few packages into a directory, you can run pkg-repo over them. This will generate a file filesite.txz which should be enough to show the format. Anything you come up with would certainly be of interest to the poudriere project (https://fossil.etoilebsd.net/poudriere/doc/trunk/doc/index.wiki), probably even more so than pkg(8) itself. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk --nWIbr1vmk1AipmJbNoJdG4jmqJWrqefwl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUCK1+XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATwEgP/088I71GgZ6tWnvBogHnBm6g WsTiLYhi1VAwTdX2HBziC7KREqMAwO0Xvo2p40ufiDls+v7IqjFNE9i/tBVRMnCk UCyt2cRh5bGcZPRQqItAStChA4bpP4BugCcY8+LF629hp52H7H0htas7oSr5hgf+ U499pZPWTP+02Wy824lQc30WnMve0H6BGdXnTb5ZDn9in7z+6gKxQg7r3SJJe3ls 0A4jpsEmTmeZCF4SAfLCtoXBoQgMzipE0ijeCzwBfM6tKSYAaWskbtwyY1A/P+9R r+WUMR2cv/XPQvxQnofQsxZ5ApQjJP6VdxiRKmBwRyoKiN8KSgVqnogI+nuTgaw1 K+okS3G3yTwQRfio3wWNvw7GzSv4go6U8x9obEQHC/zP7GINAX82qvWXUMuAqELD wQh+Wmcv/bbhaBNg/i/5qAkcUtaKrL+nLkxMbyKcRii+uHD1uary6fqAsbY6NTIa 3YORPq3yRkX7K5dYIpEyxMeY8bAncR8n/h+ddODg6k0f+AE/2WNlA3iU+Tt8PX4c Yd1y/+1vsGixD4lPWXjre7wiHnDdJb+L9io/vsItn8pijOaeEZEfZXxHuF7hX8J2 BOWlpZnXkTVP3nrOb2TtOIpY1ZIoMp/o7rfyrc3g0dbSSo9aqePlO77SsvBIjmaP yRqCiKqPWK3K4f2Vhx9M =H3TN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nWIbr1vmk1AipmJbNoJdG4jmqJWrqefwl-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 01:23:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B33EB64; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 01:23:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from qat.redports.org (qat.redports.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6420::233:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD8931114; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 01:23:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redports.org; s=04012012; h=Sender:Message-Id:To:Subject:Reply-To:Date:To:Cc:From:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=g4AcjEIYCOcrie/eRVrobGBZhQiQnsREcwrGvAjZIGw=; b=gBdIPlEHzu6oP+CZXOdXVBYRnbnLZuEVmAvMEYYd9ye1zfPoqF+geaQ7bRIWvsSWn/FUt7cvjW0E58Y0yUSydStkSIxn/y6jMWz6vIrOI7CKjz7Ji4qig+kydnEt3FpBd1YjREVWqnNp/nPv+a515S98RCTutC4GZP8wUhq4WXI=; Received: from www by qat.redports.org with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1XPiF4-000BOr-JO; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 01:23:10 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Ports-QAT" X-Trac-Version: 1.0.1 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 1.0.1, by Edgewall Software To: kmoore@FreeBSD.org X-Trac-Project: redports Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 01:23:10 -0000 Reply-To: qat@redports.org X-URL: https://qat.redports.org/ Subject: [QAT] 367319: 2x leftovers, 2x ignored: is only for amd64, while you are running i386 To: kmoore@FreeBSD.org X-Trac-Build-URL: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/20140905002200-62357 X-Trac-Build-ID: 20140905002200-62357 Message-Id: Sender: World Wide Web Owner Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, decke@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 01:23:12 -0000 Remove obsolete USE_CDRTOOLS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Build ID: 20140905002200-62357 Job owner: kmoore@FreeBSD.org Buildtime: 61 minutes Enddate: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 01:23:10 GMT Revision: 367319 Repository: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=367319 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Port: x11/lumina 0.6.2.1409847349,1 Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~kmoore@FreeBSD.org/20140905002200-62357-409822/lumina-0.6.2.1409847349,1.log Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: IGNORED: IS ONLY FOR AMD64, WHILE YOU ARE RUNNING I386 Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~kmoore@FreeBSD.org/20140905002200-62357-409824/lumina-0.6.2.1409847349,1.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: IGNORED: IS ONLY FOR AMD64, WHILE YOU ARE RUNNING I386 -- Buildarchive URL: redports From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 03:33:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBEF63D8 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 03:33:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 848421F9D for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 03:33:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1XPkHG-000OxT-5t for ports@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 05:33:34 +0200 Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 05:33:34 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: "ports@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: Firebird 2.5.3 Message-ID: <20140905033334.GY9400@home.opsec.eu> References: <1409418843.93634.YahooMailNeo@web121206.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <20140830190002.GT9400@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140830190002.GT9400@home.opsec.eu> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 03:33:37 -0000 Hi! > > Concerning: > > http://www.freshports.org/databases/firebird25-server > > > > Please tell me when version 2.5.3 will be available? > > Can you test whether the patch in > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193174 > > works for you ? Thanks to Steve for testing, update done. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 6 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 08:19:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEEBAF7B for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 08:19:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x22b.google.com (mail-we0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84B0F1C70 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 08:19:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f171.google.com with SMTP id u56so11432114wes.30 for ; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 01:19:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=lDK8Q0AuYMijHBCum6Eau0SBvZswpb2MNQKsBumyrEQ=; b=lsPtRJJ67UfzELY9YSVoYG1GpB0oB2YhVeT5K4CWsGZDhs4DPdMvPFNjNzQL6flALK bPtoIvMg8Y12r8GRp/ynCKhNXiqGljFXOHzrrwEe9VTxh7l9eE74EPxOV2sF5aGVx+Hp BMeXQOaoj0bUTT5MG76L7vTwY/0w8WyYhJDwueCDNMq8Lihc+ubfeidD5w0w/BDjzkpZ ry/0u99FbY1aE5m3QoWRWUWa/fSZH/K3C7QRWeB+R1vkqN+Md2P9P/sI2M9k+RjynFmG 0FyNOjQ6tMQerPh8NeVkH6WVZUjpg+iA2UJJ3sB24HpG18+DFlHRzEUXTic4IquBdTTH C10g== X-Received: by 10.180.189.14 with SMTP id ge14mr802472wic.36.1409905154357; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 01:19:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w2sm1152002wia.11.2014.09.05.01.19.13 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 05 Sep 2014 01:19:13 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 10:19:11 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: First step (Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life) Message-ID: <20140905081911.GB25840@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="24zk1gE8NUlDmwG9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 08:19:17 -0000 --24zk1gE8NUlDmwG9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline After the discussion that happened here is what I think we should do If no stong objections are raised thise this will happen in pkg 1.3.8 - Ignore mtree in packages - Automatically handle directory removal for any directory under PREFIX - Introduce @dir (in fact already there) for directories with special care: * empty directories * directories with special credential (@dir(user,group,mode)) - Consider directories out of PREFIX as special hence needing to be listed with @dir @dirrmtry and @dirrm will be considered changed into aliases for @dir but remain for compatibility (with a warning if DEVELOPER_MODE is set) - the possibility to accept regular plist entry as directories will be in but disable by default, allowing vendors to rely on it if they do want but leaving the ports tree not accepting them (that clarifies a lot what the the plist for maintainers) - automatic plist is postponed for later as there is no concensus and it will require lots of work to be able to provide a minimum set on fonctionnality that are important for maintainers: * having some sort of pkg filesearch to find what do provide a given file/header * being able to store what is the expected normal content of the package so a builder can raise an error is something goes wrong (this can become really tricky, given all possible options and so on) Other proposals are not rejected at all, there was sure interesting ones with nice design proposed, but that will be too intrusive for pkg 1.3.x as designed regards, Bapt --24zk1gE8NUlDmwG9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlQJcf8ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwFUgCdFom7BvCUBzTv1Rr31dWXRnZF peAAoIEU7lg2+0WAwDFrFATDT1VIeDMz =jsZy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --24zk1gE8NUlDmwG9-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 09:40:00 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51C3C6B2 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 09:40:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FEA11764 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 09:40:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1XPpzq-0001bh-4G for ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 11:39:58 +0200 Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 11:39:58 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Ahsay Backup Server software on FreeBSD ? Message-ID: <20140905093958.GZ9400@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 09:40:00 -0000 Hi! Has anyone experience with this company ? http://www.ahsay.com/ They provide a software (AhsayOBS) for free, it's the server part for a backup infrastructure. They earn money by selling client licenses (which cover Exchange, Windows, Notes, databases etc), and support FreeBSD on the server. On the server-side they need Java. Has anyone practical experience with that system ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 6 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 10:00:51 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 609F348D for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 10:00:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x22d.google.com (mail-we0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBB491CB7 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 10:00:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id t60so11494751wes.4 for ; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 03:00:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4EyUYBJ6zWXztys1AOofcE/SWN7sA4qlajsegI/8QVo=; b=aDlpvh42hRfb1OwIjh+sMnpgxbbVPR3/uN4MJmkFWQDFE5DdEZ2I4zSu1RFlzIplfn U8fCYgs58zTCS6nbQzyi1J3oUcQL5AJ5/lyGSTGzSVFcBdCEKWbh7A2J+VQAxXMZetup KWNKpP8Wo2O65eB6abDngCVBPA3yogQL/+WF6UsP0re9izgMQ0s3ySL3KSx+7RvFM0zv 9o5lqAuqTnSgdkW0oFUtLNmQLDEvDwi2cPJupp0iFbhxeFzxizztbFNqC8GatIW02lw+ PBGila1z94RWgORRaSZtvStu1bIa+ExfYMbEb1j+WO9lJPQIirnylUzGWJlMoUO9xFBD jMrg== X-Received: by 10.194.8.168 with SMTP id s8mr13350811wja.129.1409911248132; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 03:00:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.145] ([193.173.55.180]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b19sm1320163wiv.0.2014.09.05.03.00.47 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 05 Sep 2014 03:00:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <540989CF.6030302@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 12:00:47 +0200 From: Johan Hendriks User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ahsay Backup Server software on FreeBSD ? References: <20140905093958.GZ9400@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <20140905093958.GZ9400@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 10:00:51 -0000 Op 05-09-14 om 11:39 schreef Kurt Jaeger: > Hi! > > Has anyone experience with this company ? > > http://www.ahsay.com/ > > They provide a software (AhsayOBS) for free, it's the server part > for a backup infrastructure. They earn money by selling client > licenses (which cover Exchange, Windows, Notes, databases etc), and support > FreeBSD on the server. On the server-side they need Java. > > Has anyone practical experience with that system ? > > -- > pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 6 years to go ! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Hello. We use the server version as our backup server that sits remotely in a datacentre. This is on FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE and the user data we put on ZFS datasets so we can backup that machine with ZFS send to another remote machine. When we started using the ahsay server we used windows as the OS but with that we had all kind of troubles. Now we use FreeBSD as the server OS and we did not have any issue with it till now. (Knock on wood) .... It has its quirck but when it runs it does the job well. Also the GUI does not look nice it looks old and dated. On the client side we only use the windows version. We have several FreeBSD samba servers that we backup using the windows client. I have no expierience with the client on FreeBSD. Also nice is that you can run multiple clients on the same account, so you do not need extra licenses if you need to backup another server. regards Johan Hendriks From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 10:50:31 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B9CDA5E for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 10:50:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47B691256 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 10:50:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s85AoVxp061250 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 10:50:31 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id s85AoVOi061249; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 10:50:31 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201409051050.s85AoVOi061249@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 10:50:31 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 10:50:31 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ databases/jasperreports | 5.1.2 | 5.6.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ textproc/py-jaxml | 3.02 | 16.01 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ www/groupoffice | 3.7.24 | 6.0.21 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 11:18:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F6CAF0B for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 11:18:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from avasout08.plus.net (avasout08.plus.net [212.159.14.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC4114AA for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 11:18:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk ([84.92.153.232]) by avasout08 with smtp id nPJa1o005516WCc01PJbNw; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 12:18:36 +0100 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=fsVSZTIf c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:117 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:17 a=D7rCoLxHAAAA:8 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=OOzCJWdBeL0A:10 a=Tcj7s0NxxwAA:10 a=OAqljaM3Y2cA:10 a=ZTb9aqGL9YkA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=5mfK3YTBAAAA:8 a=sZlbb26qbGhy5EmwA7MA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 Received: from curlew.lan ([192.168.1.13]) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1XPrXF-0001aO-NL for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 12:18:34 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 12:18:32 +0100 Message-ID: <2699983.mP1DDQ7fn8@curlew.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.12.5 (FreeBSD/9.3-RELEASE; KDE/4.12.5; amd64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.1.13 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on curlew.lan X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Subject: Poudriere fails to set up gimp support for xsane Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 11:18:39 -0000 I first raised this issue a few weeks ago under the thread "Cant get gimp to use xsane with FreeBSD 10.-RELRASE" but after further testing it's starting to look like an issue with poudriere so I thought it appropriate to start a new thread. The problem doesn't appear to be related to the version of gimp, xsane or the OS but, for the record, here's what I currently have curlew:/home/mike% uname -a FreeBSD curlew.lan 9.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE #0 r268512: Thu Jul 10 23:44:39 UTC 2014 root@snap.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 curlew:/home/mike% pkg info gimp-app xsane pkg poudriere gimp-app-2.8.10_5,1 xsane-0.999_2 pkg-1.3.7 poudriere-3.0.17 The problem first became apparrent with gimp and xsane installed from packages. Despite pkg info indicating that xsane was built with gimp plugin support the option to use xsane did not appear in gimp's "File - Create" menu. The output from "gimp --verbose" contained the following message: Parsing '/home/mike/.gimp-2.8/pluginrc' Querying plug-in: '/home/mike/.gimp-2.8/plug-ins/xsane' /home/mike/.gimp-2.8/plug-ins/xsane: GIMP support missing (gimp:4780): LibGimpBase-WARNING **: gimp: gimp_wire_read(): error Terminating plug-in: '/home/mike/.gimp-2.8/plug-ins/xsane' Thinking that there might be a problem with the copy of xsane in the FreeBSD repository I then used poudriere to build a package for xsane and installed that but had exactly the same problem. I then used portmaster to build xsane from ports with exactly the same options and could access xsane from gimp without any problem. I've attached output from pkg info for all three versions of the package where it can be seen that the working package built by portmaster requires 8 libgimp* shared libs but these do not appear in the output for the faulty packages from the FreeBSD repository or my poudriere repository ===================================================================== Details of xsane built with portmaster ===================================================================== curlew:/home/mike% pkg info xsane xsane-0.999_2 Name : xsane Version : 0.999_2 Installed on : Thu Sep 4 20:32:06 BST 2014 Origin : graphics/xsane Architecture : freebsd:9:x86:64 Prefix : /usr/local Categories : graphics Licenses : GPLv2 Maintainer : koalative@gmail.com WWW : http://www.xsane.org/ Comment : Gtk-based X11 frontend for SANE (Scanner Access Now Easy) Options : DOCS : on GIMP : on NLS : on Shared Libs required: libtiff.so.4 libsane.so.1 libpng15.so.15 libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libpango-1.0.so.0 liblcms.so.1 libjpeg.so.11 libintl.so.9 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgio-2.0.so.0 libgimpwidgets-2.0.so.0 libgimpui-2.0.so.0 libgimpmodule-2.0.so.0 libgimpmath-2.0.so.0 libgimpconfig-2.0.so.0 libgimpcolor-2.0.so.0 libgimpbase-2.0.so.0 libgimp-2.0.so.0 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libfreetype.so.6 libfontconfig.so.1 libcairo.so.2 libatk-1.0.so.0 Flat size : 4.72MiB Description : XSANE is a gtk based X11 frontend for SANE (Scanner Access Now Easy). It works either standalone or as a GIMP plugin. WWW: http://www.xsane.org/ ===================================================================== Details of xsane built with poudriere Note 8 missing shared libs: libgimpwidgets-2.0.so.0 libgimpui-2.0.so.0 libgimpmodule-2.0.so.0 libgimpmath-2.0.so.0 libgimpconfig-2.0.so.0 libgimpcolor-2.0.so.0 libgimpbase-2.0.so.0 libgimp-2.0.so.0 ===================================================================== curlew:/home/mike% pkg info xsane xsane-0.999_2 Name : xsane Version : 0.999_2 Installed on : Fri Sep 5 10:29:08 BST 2014 Origin : graphics/xsane Architecture : freebsd:9:x86:64 Prefix : /usr/local Categories : graphics Licenses : GPLv2 Maintainer : koalative@gmail.com WWW : http://www.xsane.org/ Comment : Gtk-based X11 frontend for SANE (Scanner Access Now Easy) Options : DOCS : on GIMP : on NLS : on Shared Libs required: libtiff.so.4 libsane.so.1 libpng15.so.15 libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libpango-1.0.so.0 liblcms.so.1 libjpeg.so.11 libintl.so.9 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgio-2.0.so.0 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libfreetype.so.6 libfontconfig.so.1 libcairo.so.2 libatk-1.0.so.0 Annotations : repo_type : binary repository : poudriere Flat size : 4.71MiB Description : XSANE is a gtk based X11 frontend for SANE (Scanner Access Now Easy). It works either standalone or as a GIMP plugin. WWW: http://www.xsane.org/ ===================================================================== Details of xsane installed from FreeBSD repository Note the same 8 missing shared libs but also an extra 10 libX* shared libs not present in the other 2 versions ===================================================================== curlew:/home/mike% pkg info xsane xsane-0.999_2 Name : xsane Version : 0.999_2 Installed on : Fri Sep 5 10:40:15 BST 2014 Origin : graphics/xsane Architecture : freebsd:9:x86:64 Prefix : /usr/local Categories : graphics Licenses : GPLv2 Maintainer : koalative@gmail.com WWW : http://www.xsane.org/ Comment : Gtk-based X11 frontend for SANE (Scanner Access Now Easy) Options : DOCS : on GIMP : on NLS : on Shared Libs required: libtiff.so.4 libsane.so.1 libpng15.so.15 libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libpango-1.0.so.0 liblcms.so.1 libjpeg.so.11 libintl.so.9 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgio-2.0.so.0 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libfreetype.so.6 libfontconfig.so.1 libcairo.so.2 libatk-1.0.so.0 libXrender.so.1 libXrandr.so.2 libXinerama.so.1 libXi.so.6 libXfixes.so.3 libXext.so.6 libXdamage.so.1 libXcursor.so.1 libXcomposite.so.1 libX11.so.6 Annotations : repo_type : binary repository : FreeBSD Flat size : 4.71MiB Description : XSANE is a gtk based X11 frontend for SANE (Scanner Access Now Easy). It works either standalone or as a GIMP plugin. WWW: http://www.xsane.org/ ===================================================================== -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 15:21:24 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89B52AF5 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 15:21:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from unitix.org (unitix.org [82.149.245.106]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2EEB51397 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 15:21:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25519 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2014 15:14:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hurx.thc) (84.59.122.98) by peer.unitix.org with SMTP; 5 Sep 2014 15:14:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 1762 invoked by uid 1001); 5 Sep 2014 15:14:40 -0000 Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 17:14:40 +0200 From: Christian Jachmann To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: relay-ctrl has been removed, why ? Message-ID: <20140905151440.GA1747@hurx.thc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 15:21:24 -0000 Hi ports ? Why has relay-ctrl heen removed from the portstree ? It worked quiet a long time w.o. any problems for me. It still compiles under 10.1, but is no longer in the tree. Could you please bring it back ? I'm using qmail and relay-ctrl here for years. Thanks. Christian Jachmann From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 15:34:56 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F730296 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 15:34:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE9A01586 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 15:34:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1XPvXG-0004MN-Kw; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 17:34:50 +0200 Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 17:34:50 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Christian Jachmann Subject: Re: relay-ctrl has been removed, why ? Message-ID: <20140905153450.GA9400@home.opsec.eu> References: <20140905151440.GA1747@hurx.thc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140905151440.GA1747@hurx.thc> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 15:34:56 -0000 Hello, > Why has relay-ctrl heen removed from the portstree ? The ports tree made some technical upgrades recently, which required all ports to be modified so that it still works in the new ports tree. More about this can be found here: https://wiki.freebsd.org/ports/StageDir Nobody did this for mail/relay-ctrl and therefore it was removed a few days ago. > It worked quiet a long time w.o. any problems for me. > It still compiles under 10.1, but is no longer in the tree. > > Could you please bring it back ? > > I'm using qmail and relay-ctrl here for years. Can you provide a patch that provides staging for this port ? Then it can be resurrected. If you have additional questions, please ask, and we'll try to help. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 6 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 15:48:00 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BB80B60 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 15:48:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3659D183F for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 15:48:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 0161733C25; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 11:47:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Christian Jachmann Subject: Re: relay-ctrl has been removed, why ? References: <20140905151440.GA1747@hurx.thc> Reply-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 11:47:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20140905151440.GA1747@hurx.thc> (Christian Jachmann's message of "Fri, 5 Sep 2014 17:14:40 +0200") Message-ID: <44ha0mjcgh.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 15:48:00 -0000 Christian Jachmann writes: > Why has relay-ctrl heen removed from the portstree ? > > It worked quiet a long time w.o. any problems for me. > It still compiles under 10.1, but is no longer in the tree. ~> grep relay-ctrl /usr/ports/* /usr/ports/MOVED:mail/relay-ctrl||2014-09-01|Not staged ~> > Could you please bring it back ? Somebody would have to do the work to write staging support for it. > I'm using qmail and relay-ctrl here for years. Well, the port would definitely need some work to be reinstated. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 15:48:49 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EC0CC04; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 15:48:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-x22d.google.com (mail-ob0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F16A184F; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 15:48:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f173.google.com with SMTP id uy5so8802997obc.4 for ; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 08:48:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=qXp0J0rOxAGZOZSXFGiBOaEM5cj5p6SeDgAeLaHw/9E=; b=br3gBnQ9YZk562zEuZCAQaz8e1WxHwdqCgEzgfXgVNFFqkVB+dUhH09C7SLouxQp6e Fs9xC+tnN64/HYhtbhAqQqxyOQbOxnoH1oozJJPa6/INbsQ6EWzhaI3WHm2EJK0gNiRL lop3hnf65f419ffE+vqZcOto/V5dacNP1z22CIVASV1xWlhtShDaSjXNL378RFmyubcD /lmpqc0COGoCwK8EOGdHmPclQbvjuy3bM8asG82Po+tcRZe2RzW3OdAiQLbPaEc6Zqui H5FrHQl3vZr+PrtZpYK1SHL2RMKHNKyAaUiD5sjTYkTULPuxlGGAa3nXKmK4t0omLvCi FGpQ== X-Received: by 10.182.114.169 with SMTP id jh9mr14731740obb.25.1409932128600; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 08:48:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.76.175.230 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 08:48:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140905081911.GB25840@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140905081911.GB25840@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> From: Dreamcat4 Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 16:48:08 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: First step (Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life) To: Baptiste Daroussin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 15:48:49 -0000 And for the documentation. Porter's handbook, it needs changes? On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > After the discussion that happened here is what I think we should do > If no stong objections are raised thise this will happen in pkg 1.3.8 > > - Ignore mtree in packages > - Automatically handle directory removal for any directory under PREFIX > - Introduce @dir (in fact already there) for directories with special care: > * empty directories > * directories with special credential (@dir(user,group,mode)) > - Consider directories out of PREFIX as special hence needing to be listed with > @dir > > @dirrmtry and @dirrm will be considered changed into aliases for @dir but remain > for compatibility (with a warning if DEVELOPER_MODE is set) > > - the possibility to accept regular plist entry as directories will be in but > disable by default, allowing vendors to rely on it if they do want but leaving > the ports tree not accepting them (that clarifies a lot what the the plist for > maintainers) > > - automatic plist is postponed for later as there is no concensus and it will > require lots of work to be able to provide a minimum set on fonctionnality > that are important for maintainers: > * having some sort of pkg filesearch to find what do provide a given > file/header > * being able to store what is the expected normal content of the package so a > builder can raise an error is something goes wrong (this can become really > tricky, given all possible options and so on) > > Other proposals are not rejected at all, there was sure interesting ones with > nice design proposed, but that will be too intrusive for pkg 1.3.x as designed > > regards, > Bapt From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 16:06:31 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0220E54E for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 16:06:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x22d.google.com (mail-wg0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 879981A4D for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 16:06:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id k14so11739534wgh.28 for ; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 09:06:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=fjw3Y1/tuOmiKaQ+b2kamVpofkbiHvd57O+ksyyNMnY=; b=emlqSvWCu2kNAh8OV+sNZqpr1BLBCR+KVNVj02fiOJzEHx1sCvYAfq+HmDgWDFIkQV Eg+3idKz+csbwdc2s7wzCSCdcwy15qYCGMydREMBCT3FPRYZUCQbNUKRpXk8GFNtJmtj oYQe/znaOmKvaNVX8FNnHDA0vWVTlBaYSnhPjrtHNGXcJJuxXak/J4uqRMQrZ3ZSjMry FqlZByizNvue1jIYcHor4AqGqdyiuI/DgYoFUrmQG2iBYU2cmr2TBxSRfq7l76UbtsRR BfixHbXYmohuPoJi/li39Z5d2w17bNdPLG9Dp5DtNlI6BSS0PlksvppQEtN7LDFdYN9b K+yg== X-Received: by 10.194.161.231 with SMTP id xv7mr16639482wjb.78.1409933188373; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 09:06:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w20sm2409432wie.7.2014.09.05.09.06.27 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 05 Sep 2014 09:06:27 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 18:06:25 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Dreamcat4 Subject: Re: First step (Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life) Message-ID: <20140905160625.GA40535@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140905081911.GB25840@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 16:06:31 -0000 --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 04:48:08PM +0100, Dreamcat4 wrote: > And for the documentation. Porter's handbook, it needs changes? >=20 Yes this will come along thanks for reminding. > On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wro= te: > > After the discussion that happened here is what I think we should do > > If no stong objections are raised thise this will happen in pkg 1.3.8 > > > > - Ignore mtree in packages > > - Automatically handle directory removal for any directory under PREFIX > > - Introduce @dir (in fact already there) for directories with special c= are: > > * empty directories > > * directories with special credential (@dir(user,group,mode)) > > - Consider directories out of PREFIX as special hence needing to be lis= ted with > > @dir > > > > @dirrmtry and @dirrm will be considered changed into aliases for @dir b= ut remain > > for compatibility (with a warning if DEVELOPER_MODE is set) > > > > - the possibility to accept regular plist entry as directories will be = in but > > disable by default, allowing vendors to rely on it if they do want bu= t leaving > > the ports tree not accepting them (that clarifies a lot what the the = plist for > > maintainers) > > > > - automatic plist is postponed for later as there is no concensus and i= t will > > require lots of work to be able to provide a minimum set on fonctionn= ality > > that are important for maintainers: > > * having some sort of pkg filesearch to find what do provide a given > > file/header > > * being able to store what is the expected normal content of the pack= age so a > > builder can raise an error is something goes wrong (this can become= really > > tricky, given all possible options and so on) > > > > Other proposals are not rejected at all, there was sure interesting one= s with > > nice design proposed, but that will be too intrusive for pkg 1.3.x as d= esigned > > > > regards, > > Bapt --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlQJ34EACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ex6sQCeNkevFK+EIhN7hhmvk/HW3I5n Ey8AnjP+p2oPn1+TLWmG/kmw57gIHBB2 =eFnC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 16:23:22 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF7BA8F1 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 16:23:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 692F41C5F for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 16:23:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mandree.no-ip.org ([78.49.247.146]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MgKUo-1XnXPj2myU-00NjCR for ; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 18:23:13 +0200 Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost6.localdomain6 [IPv6:::1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9AE623CE71 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 18:23:12 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5409E370.7050706@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 18:23:12 +0200 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: relay-ctrl has been removed, why ? References: <20140905151440.GA1747@hurx.thc> In-Reply-To: <20140905151440.GA1747@hurx.thc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:EOwP5URc6DvlGw3ISLLXXVHGP0QDz6Wu1Gr6GX8qCg53hJ07tut mEw9eEaV2a15+A4KoxsXNYDxoJhnS53C0fQ7VVlVANm/TKkUGRwBB4quX/72Vv3sNNR8VRE gsWNKGbru5Kyr4N35BPX3H2a/t0thbtazGSnVOycwIWPAXIabxBcpizbaxjtC+w0Exyc2JO FCDsvEtqo91h255eoNy9g== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 16:23:22 -0000 Am 05.09.2014 um 17:14 schrieb Christian Jachmann: > > > Hi ports ? > > Why has relay-ctrl heen removed from the portstree ? > > It worked quiet a long time w.o. any problems for me. > It still compiles under 10.1, but is no longer in the tree. > > Could you please bring it back ? > > I'm using qmail and relay-ctrl here for years. I suggest to take the opportunity to move to a modern system then. qmail has been obsolete for one and a half decades, and Postfix or Exim come with relay-controls built in. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 16:27:19 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6FE99FC for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 16:27:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x236.google.com (mail-we0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B2B71CA3 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 16:27:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id w62so12149749wes.27 for ; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 09:27:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=IB253yE5Pus8HRMEgj4H0g1fR9yrdXR28OAFz3IaQWo=; b=LphVLZP9Kh9owx0zV7Wr6NvJPobFfz7MyHoJc36HR38gz5VdlpYgpaPlo31JbfYDYi RjCGbzYQHIQIIfVT9Moq2/esni6SdQVbwnvJRlbbKp1hF0+DESgKOkwlEKnmG07ZuE0m ow7d5UJPjucK3sWoMVFDxKN9NIfd2LhZiFrigjYwfQyPyzsYYJiN/0GbXslsus9XX9nw xyaSIQAHOB4XWRkGXCgkdwUA8olYqsxfYh3YCllLwPTlM0qMgYm/cchlMv8l8YMbzOh3 +tEzYVfwKk+gzMBlS8bCPJTIDAgoRY3ksy8ObMGjEKrs6MtdOQhldACx65oD5lqRJ0gT YjZg== X-Received: by 10.194.8.168 with SMTP id s8mr16285327wja.129.1409934437504; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 09:27:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ln6sm1926604wjb.13.2014.09.05.09.27.16 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 05 Sep 2014 09:27:16 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 18:27:14 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Matthias Andree Subject: Re: First step (Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life) Message-ID: <20140905162714.GB40535@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140905081911.GB25840@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <5409E30A.7010808@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oC1+HKm2/end4ao3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5409E30A.7010808@gmx.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 16:27:19 -0000 --oC1+HKm2/end4ao3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 06:21:30PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 >=20 > Am 05.09.2014 um 10:19 schrieb Baptiste Daroussin: > > After the discussion that happened here is what I think we should do > > If no stong objections are raised thise this will happen in pkg 1.3.8 > >=20 > > - Ignore mtree in packages > > - Automatically handle directory removal for any directory under PREFIX > > - Introduce @dir (in fact already there) for directories with special c= are: > > * empty directories > > * directories with special credential (@dir(user,group,mode)) > > - Consider directories out of PREFIX as special hence needing to be lis= ted with > > @dir > >=20 > > @dirrmtry and @dirrm will be considered changed into aliases for @dir b= ut remain > > for compatibility (with a warning if DEVELOPER_MODE is set) >=20 > Is pkg now ready to reference-count multiple packages referencing the > same directory? It has always been :) >=20 > >=20 > > - the possibility to accept regular plist entry as directories will be = in but > > disable by default, allowing vendors to rely on it if they do want bu= t leaving > > the ports tree not accepting them (that clarifies a lot what the the = plist for > > maintainers) >=20 > I strongly object to this part, and request that such dead code not be > added to pkg. This is a gratuitious change, for "vendors" that as of > now are phantoms (lack a particular use case), and, as written before, > it voids error checking on the file type, and dead code is usually > buggier than used code because noone sees the bugs until the code is > enabled (but not properly reintegrated) years later. This is not dead code as I know already 2 vendors that uses that already, secondly pkg(8) is used by system not using the ports tree, some of those requires that feature. In anycase there is no plan at all to activate this in the ports tree. >=20 > The use case why we need the distinction is the common error > if a maintainer forgets the mkdir in the {pre,do,post}-install: target, > and the install path lacks the trailing slash, then packaging will no > longer fail. >=20 > Example: >=20 > post-install: > ${INSTALL_DATA} blah/something ${STAGEDIR}${DOCSDIR}/blah >=20 > This will rename something to blah while installing into ${DOCSDIR}, > rather than installing "something" into ${DOCSDIR}/blah/. >=20 > Especially with make makeplist or auto-plist rigs, this is bound to > fail, and sit undiscovered for a while. >=20 > If the distinction between directory and other file types remains > explicit and mandatory, these errors are much harder to find. >=20 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1 >=20 > iEYEARECAAYFAlQJ4wIACgkQvmGDOQUufZU+ZwCggmcsS2yyo761R8X3a9xUHnm7 > /yYAn0L3wvhqQYR21uTedLTco3sAXxvt > =3DNJdy > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- regards, Bapt --oC1+HKm2/end4ao3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlQJ5GIACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExxpQCfVGn0nzugiGVZinMqDZXtbEPm wwwAoJtUaZcFBaohgxq/HneF01OGqW9I =aW2v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oC1+HKm2/end4ao3-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 16:34:40 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B770BD92 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 16:34:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 366881D7D for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 16:34:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mandree.no-ip.org ([78.49.247.146]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M5Lqx-1YK8Dj0dsl-00zWpc; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 18:21:32 +0200 Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost6.localdomain6 [IPv6:::1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC06E23CE71; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 18:21:30 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5409E30A.7010808@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 18:21:30 +0200 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: First step (Re: [BRAINSTORMING] simplifying maintainer's life) References: <20140903082538.GE63085@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140905081911.GB25840@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20140905081911.GB25840@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:OZN3C3ulREgyt/VFOhxlo7mLJd4A/UH3tBVfT42o33hfcp+6aDf GB5Sl4xoWC5PHbaxV7moeaEqqy4RL7WQusuvwM54iGk6vJEtiF1K37HQh09A/HPTZ812xEq jDQIJ9p3hTi6vRDkwR8OhsHdCEgxCUoYGXCR6brBNegQA0Qy9WClNQjzqSb12ew+Hkp9L5d smqB57RNlBmbOZira6cZg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Cc: Baptiste Daroussin X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 16:34:40 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 05.09.2014 um 10:19 schrieb Baptiste Daroussin: > After the discussion that happened here is what I think we should do > If no stong objections are raised thise this will happen in pkg 1.3.8 > > - Ignore mtree in packages > - Automatically handle directory removal for any directory under PREFIX > - Introduce @dir (in fact already there) for directories with special care: > * empty directories > * directories with special credential (@dir(user,group,mode)) > - Consider directories out of PREFIX as special hence needing to be listed with > @dir > > @dirrmtry and @dirrm will be considered changed into aliases for @dir but remain > for compatibility (with a warning if DEVELOPER_MODE is set) Is pkg now ready to reference-count multiple packages referencing the same directory? > > - the possibility to accept regular plist entry as directories will be in but > disable by default, allowing vendors to rely on it if they do want but leaving > the ports tree not accepting them (that clarifies a lot what the the plist for > maintainers) I strongly object to this part, and request that such dead code not be added to pkg. This is a gratuitious change, for "vendors" that as of now are phantoms (lack a particular use case), and, as written before, it voids error checking on the file type, and dead code is usually buggier than used code because noone sees the bugs until the code is enabled (but not properly reintegrated) years later. The use case why we need the distinction is the common error if a maintainer forgets the mkdir in the {pre,do,post}-install: target, and the install path lacks the trailing slash, then packaging will no longer fail. Example: post-install: ${INSTALL_DATA} blah/something ${STAGEDIR}${DOCSDIR}/blah This will rename something to blah while installing into ${DOCSDIR}, rather than installing "something" into ${DOCSDIR}/blah/. Especially with make makeplist or auto-plist rigs, this is bound to fail, and sit undiscovered for a while. If the distinction between directory and other file types remains explicit and mandatory, these errors are much harder to find. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlQJ4wIACgkQvmGDOQUufZU+ZwCggmcsS2yyo761R8X3a9xUHnm7 /yYAn0L3wvhqQYR21uTedLTco3sAXxvt =NJdy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 16:39:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F11FCC for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 16:39:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ts2-022.amherst.auracom.net (ts2-022.amherst.auracom.net [165.154.84.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D0431DCC for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 16:39:11 +0000 (UTC) From: "Important Warning" Reply-To: nuclearwarning@hushmail.com To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Nuclear Attack On Houston And Dallas May Be Near! X-Mailer: Smart_Send_3_1_6 Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 12:39:24 -0400 Message-ID: <11120365938520104966834@Home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 16:39:12 -0000 Many prophets have received warnings over the years of a nuclear attack on America soil. The two dreams herein are quite alarming to me as I am a witness to God having sent prophet Linda Newkirk to speak His judgements over Dallas and Houston several years ago. Linda was told to place wreaths at both cities and speak pronouncements from the Lord about the coming destruction of both cities. Linda was also sent to Atlanta and Oklahoma to speak judgments over those cities as well. The following warning by a man who also saw 911 before it happened was posted a couple of days ago. Please send this man's warning to anyone you know who lives in Texas. It is not a matter of if this is going to happen, but more a matter of when it will happen. America is filled with sin and people will not repent. Dream Of Nuclear Attack On Houston And Dallas August 30th, 2014 Hello Steve, I had a dream last night, it's the same dream that I had sometime last year. I wrote to you about that dream. You posted it. I cannot find it, but the same dream came to me last night. In this dream I was standing on Interstate 45 between Dallas TX and Houston TX. I could see both outlines of the cities from where I stood. In reality you cannot do that they are too far apart. But in this dream I can see them both. I see that it is the middle of the day and I can see that people are moving around without a care, like it is the middle of the week day, not a weekend. I then see that in my dream I keep thinking it is a star falling from the sky, very bright and lighting up the whole sky as it is falling. First the city of Houston is lit up and I can see the star falling from the sky, very bright and lighting up the whole sky as it is falling. First the city of Houston is lit up and I can see the star coming down. Then I hear a loud boom noise from behind and I turn to see Dallas being hit first with another star. I see Dallas burn. All I see afterwards is that everything is burned completely. Even the trees are all gone. No buildings are left standing. There is rubble evrywhere. Very few people are left. Just handfuls, I can see them standing in little huddles looking around and crying and disoriented. I wish I could help them, but they cannot see me. I then turn around to look at Houston and the same thing happens to Houston. It is completely gone. Not a single soul made it out alive. It is completely gone. Nothing is left. Nothing! A crater is left and it becomes filled with water. I then begin to stand and cry and I asked why do these stars fall here. Then immediately there is a man standing next to me. I have seen him before in my dreams. I do not know him in real life. He tells me the same thing he told me last time I had this dream. He said "these are not stars, these are missiles made by men to destroy people and kill" I then cry out why? He then says to me "these men are evil and they have been planning these things a long time" I then turn around and begin to walk and he walks with me and that is when I wake up. These dreams are so real to me, they disturb me and keep me thinking. I have decided to take a job offer due to these dreams. I will be working in San Antonio for a year away from both Dallas and Houston. The last time I had similar dreams was back in 1999. They were about tall buildings. I had never been to New York, so I didn't know what I was looking at. But when it happened I came to understand what I had been seeing. Praying for you and yours. May God Bless you and the work that you are doing.... L. Please visit revelation12.ca to read some very sobering warnings about what is at our door. Also read the Obama prophecies at the site as well. There is a lot of background information about him and his plans for Christians. Barack Obama has been purging the US Military of all patriots, especially those involved in Nuclear Control and Command. He is also in the process of removing 6000 officers from the Navy. Make no mistake about it, he will be involved in the stand down of the US Military when the Russians and Chinese attack. Mark Brander Update... a second confirmation of what is coming to Houston was posted in the comment section on a post of this man's warning. Re: Terrifying Dream Of Houston And Dallas Being Nuked! I had similar dreams years ago. Houston was completely devastated and water completely covered it up (not once, but twice. The first wave had debris of destruction and reached past Austin but not quite to Dallas. Second wave reached the Southern-most part of Dallas and the hills around Lake Ray Hubbard to the east lost their houses to the lake with a massive mud slide. After that Dallas was engulfed with fire. The location of the blast was a triangular shaped tall building in downtown. Everything was burnt-up. However, survivors came out of the rubble disoriented and crying but a few rose up with determination and strong faith - an unexpected blessing. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 18:55:03 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29DC5511 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 18:55:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C914A1E4A for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 18:55:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mandree.no-ip.org ([78.49.247.146]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MK17F-1XRLZR2qU1-001RZV for ; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 20:55:00 +0200 Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost6.localdomain6 [IPv6:::1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 988CE23CE71 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 20:54:59 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <540A0703.90801@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 20:54:59 +0200 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: net/ntop strip: ... Invalid operation References: <20140904123253.3ce66f73b13e27196ea55c04@3dresearch.com> In-Reply-To: <20140904123253.3ce66f73b13e27196ea55c04@3dresearch.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:JkWodY2yoovaSlzV0gts6hjsH9qJ2et1cGEhnUbSn7Akp8l8pxW oSbYsEr8Ogc1R+MJ95ccKyDtbCfdWTavlDP0eWNX6NyIuJaSL0RrM1Tb5cQV874du4jvwke e3em5B54b7P3UtUn2JQj+VR7tqnoKRQ5hmIDpP8jjUYmynDY6edNglxV+Tm4ULpyoMJuYOd KzRq4lP3xVnaT7qNahPRg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 18:55:03 -0000 Am 04.09.2014 um 18:32 schrieb Janos Dohanics: > I'm trying to build and install net/ntop and getting this error > (FreeBSD 8.4-STABLE #0 r264373 amd64): > > ===> Generating temporary packing list > CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/sh ./missing --run echo -I m4 > -I m4 > cd . && /bin/sh ./missing --run echo --gnu > --gnu > CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/sh ./missing --run echo > > if test -z 'strip'; then \ > gmake INSTALL_PROGRAM="/bin/sh /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop-5.0.1/install-sh -c -s" \ > install_sh_PROGRAM="/bin/sh /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop-5.0.1/install-sh -c -s" INSTALL_STRIP_FLAG=-s \ > install; \ > else \ > gmake INSTALL_PROGRAM="/bin/sh /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop-5.0.1/install-sh -c -s" \ > install_sh_PROGRAM="/bin/sh /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop-5.0.1/install-sh -c -s" INSTALL_STRIP_FLAG=-s \ > "INSTALL_PROGRAM_ENV=STRIPPROG='strip'" install; \ > fi > gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop-5.0.1' > CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/sh ./missing --run echo -I m4 > -I m4 > cd . && /bin/sh ./missing --run echo --gnu > --gnu > CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/sh ./missing --run echo > > Making install in . > gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop-5.0.1' > CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/sh ./missing --run echo -I m4 > -I m4 > cd . && /bin/sh ./missing --run echo --gnu > --gnu > CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/sh ./missing --run echo > > gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop-5.0.1' > CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/sh ./missing --run echo -I m4 > -I m4 > cd . && /bin/sh ./missing --run echo --gnu > --gnu > CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/sh ./missing --run echo > > /bin/mkdir -p '/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/stage/usr/local/lib' > /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=install /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel -s libntop.la libntopreport.la '/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/stage/usr/local/lib' > libtool: install: /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel .libs/libntop-5.0.1.so /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/stage/usr/local/lib/libntop-5.0.1.so > libtool: install: strip --strip-unneeded /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/stage/usr/local/lib/libntop-5.0.1.so > libtool: install: (cd /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/stage/usr/local/lib && { ln -s -f libntop-5.0.1.so libntop.so || { rm -f libntop.so && ln -s libntop-5.0.1.so libntop.so; }; }) > libtool: install: /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel .libs/libntop.lai /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/stage/usr/local/lib/libntop.la > libtool: install: warning: relinking `libntopreport.la' > libtool: install: (cd /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop-5.0.1; /bin/sh /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop-5.0.1/libtool --tag CC --mode=relink cc -g -O2 -pipe -I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -I/opt/local/include -g -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -I /usr/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/local/include/python2.7 -I/usr/local/include/python2.7 -fno-strict-aliasing -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -release 5.0.1 -export-dynamic -L/usr/local/lib -pthread -Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib-L/usr/local/lib -L/opt/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/lib -o libntopreport.la -rpath /usr/local/lib emitter.lo globals-report.lo graph.lo httpd.lo report.lo reportUtils.lo ssl_utils.lo webInterface.lo map.lo python.lo libntop.la -lpthread -lc -lcrypt -lssl -lcrypto -lgdbm -lz -L/usr/local/lib -lintl -lutil -lm -lpython2.7 -lGeoIP -L/usr/lib -lpcap -L/usr/local/lib -lrrd_th ./nDPI/sr c / > lib/.libs/libndpi.a -inst-prefix-dir /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/stage) > > *** Warning: Linking the shared library libntopreport.la against the > *** static library ./nDPI/src/lib/.libs/libndpi.a is not portable! > libtool: relink: cc -shared -fPIC -DPIC .libs/emitter.o .libs/globals-report.o .libs/graph.o .libs/httpd.o .libs/report.o .libs/reportUtils.o .libs/ssl_utils.o .libs/webInterface.o .libs/map.o .libs/python.o -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/opt/local/lib -L/usr/lib ./.libs/libntop.so -lpthread -lcrypt -lssl -lcrypto /usr/local/lib/libgdbm.so -lz /usr/local/lib/libintl.so -lutil -lm -lpython2.7 -lGeoIP -lpcap -lrrd_th ./nDPI/src/lib/.libs/libndpi.a -O2 -O2 -pthread -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib-L/usr/local/lib -pthread -Wl,-soname -Wl,libntopreport-5.0.1.so -o .libs/libntopreport-5.0.1.so > libtool: install: /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel .libs/libntopreport-5.0.1.soT /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/stage/usr/local/lib/libntopreport-5.0.1.so > libtool: install: strip --strip-unneeded /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/stage/usr/local/lib/libntopreport-5.0.1.so > libtool: install: (cd /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/stage/usr/local/lib && { ln -s -f libntopreport-5.0.1.so libntopreport.so || { rm -f libntopreport.so && ln -s libntopreport-5.0.1.so libntopreport.so; }; }) > libtool: install: /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel .libs/libntopreport.lai /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/stage/usr/local/lib/libntopreport.la > libtool: install: /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel .libs/libntop.a /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/stage/usr/local/lib/libntop.a > libtool: install: strip --strip-debug /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/stage/usr/local/lib/libntop.a > strip: /usr/ports/net/ntop/work/stage/usr/local/lib/stcf7kmO/libndpi.a: Invalid operation > gmake[3]: *** [install-libLTLIBRARIES] Error 1 > gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop-5.0.1' > gmake[2]: *** [install-am] Error 2 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop-5.0.1' > gmake[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/ntop/work/ntop-5.0.1' > gmake: *** [install-strip] Error 2 > *** Error code 2 > > Stop in /usr/ports/net/ntop. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/net/ntop. > > I understand that net/ntop is unmaintained, but someone perhaps still > could advise... > It should be stripping and linking the .so files or executables. Stripping the .a apparently does not work. Check if you have some libndpi.so somewhere (perhaps in a hidden .libs directory) and also check that you don't add static-link options that you do not need. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 18:57:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02FC069D for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 18:57:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 909911E69 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 18:57:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mandree.no-ip.org ([78.49.247.146]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LZiLk-1Y73Dq1vzA-00lUEh for ; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 20:57:06 +0200 Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost6.localdomain6 [IPv6:::1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EC6D23CE71 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 20:57:05 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <540A0781.90609@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 20:57:05 +0200 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: net/ntop strip: ... Invalid operation References: <20140904123253.3ce66f73b13e27196ea55c04@3dresearch.com> In-Reply-To: <20140904123253.3ce66f73b13e27196ea55c04@3dresearch.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:6izYNbzZ5H4d6B17QUzAojCymCUP5j6P3AeadfBA+JTiRfdAUS8 G+Woa3pB7dZ/b+qLexbs5GeYd247jt2s3d3+vkz6hLtH+cirkAQwjp3y8RHwvV7nv+uF33L /yME6vjNqDt73sIUMPI2qZrnMO6bGZ8lIa7xWNlFKbXIJgt3L3zj57crxz8fsLziwqJvPz1 hONncWNQMcq2/33XiXYUg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 18:57:09 -0000 > I understand that net/ntop is unmaintained, but someone perhaps still > could advise... Another suggestion, after checking the website: did you try ntopng yet? Would that work for you? It is already ported, and has a maintainer address on it. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 20:10:15 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94CB7D3C for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 20:10:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x22c.google.com (mail-la0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CD2817F6 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 20:10:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f44.google.com with SMTP id gl10so881177lab.17 for ; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 13:10:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=hsJywD1HUcEwAl2ozquIkgl3dY/Bc52cxZ+pYK3xJ1E=; b=fAz5KFgZOpLN5rNb2MNtTyVL1lPFVcBvViINp+hXSXkfHmIRTa/nRkusEHI5gvtq7C iHtRG1oLCVZtSJ6jexvwAgxO8CIUGNg0yJgWNx9gluRzYhQS8zmq7Pkazznk75SzB+/d yols59r4fvcAYXS656I0Q6M6QwaBym/5boOlhyDLuZ5tZSDgpVeNnNvid9dU79g/Nxcs VnIuIQ96FsiCsAnWef2caik10XLmjaLoTnk1/brQgXQmNCWplZdt2S1bbj2EVyjGXZdQ QDZ6OrRTiAV5J4fHPKXx0WseNSNW+JBjewv2EtGTLT2lPXeSDU+DXsQxVY7FyjrJkoda VEuA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.246.37 with SMTP id xt5mr13956857lac.71.1409947812880; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 13:10:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.197.1 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 13:10:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 17:10:12 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: About moldenogl in biology/molden From: Eduardo Lemos de Sa To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=001a113496d08a03fb0502570e67 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 20:10:15 -0000 --001a113496d08a03fb0502570e67 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Porters First it all, I wish to say thank for support us to have molden running in FreeBSD. I got compiled and run the last port to molden (molden5.0.7_1,1) without problems. But, I notice that a software (moldenogl) was not installed. I could compiled after unpack molden5.0.7.tgz in another directory and editing (a little) makefile. Comparing my makefile with makefile from ports, I couldn't notice any difference. So, I tried to compile your port (adding moldenogl to the list archives where there are molden gmolden surf ambfor) but I was unsucessfull. Please, could you point what I must to do add moldenogl to this suit or could you add it? In attchment, the Makefile modified by me after editing your Makefile in ports Thank you in advance Yours Eduardo --=20 Eduardo Lemos de Sa Associated Professor Level 4 Dep. Quimica da Universidade Federal do Paran=C3=A1 fone: +55(41)3361-3300 fax: +55(41)3361-3186 Voip Number call to (41) 33613600 (listen to the message and type 10531185) --001a113496d08a03fb0502570e67 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=Makefile-modified-by-Edu Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=Makefile-modified-by-Edu Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: f_hzpyihwz0 IyBDcmVhdGVkIGJ5OiBSeW8gTUlZQU1PVE8gPHJtaXlhQGNjLmhpcm9zYWtpLXUuYWMuanA+CiMg JEZyZWVCU0Q6IGhlYWQvYmlvbG9neS9tb2xkZW4vTWFrZWZpbGUgMzUyOTkzIDIwMTQtMDUtMDUg MTE6MTU6NTNaIGJhcHQgJAoKUE9SVE5BTUU9CW1vbGRlbgpQT1JUVkVSU0lPTj0JNS4wLjcKUE9S VFJFVklTSU9OPQkxClBPUlRFUE9DSD0JMQpDQVRFR09SSUVTPQliaW9sb2d5Ck1BU1RFUl9TSVRF Uz0JZnRwOi8vZnRwLmNtYmkucnUubmwvcHViL21vbGdyYXBoL21vbGRlbi8KRElTVE5BTUU9CSR7 UE9SVE5BTUV9JHtQT1JUVkVSU0lPTn0KCk1BSU5UQUlORVI9CXBvcnRzQEZyZWVCU0Qub3JnCkNP TU1FTlQ9CURpc3BsYXkgbW9sZWN1bGFyIG9yYml0YWxzIGFuZCBlbGVjdHJvbiBkZW5zaXRpZXMg aW4gMkQgYW5kIDNECgpSRVNUUklDVEVEPQlmcmVlIGZvciBhY2FkZW1pYywgbm9uIHByb2ZpdCB1 c2FnZTsgZG8gbm90IHJlLWRpc3RyaWJ1dGUgc291cmNlIGFuZCBleGVjdXRhYmxlLgoKV1JLU1JD PQkJJHtXUktESVJ9LyR7UE9SVE5BTUV9JHtQT1JUVkVSU0lPTjpSfQoKVVNFUz0JCWZvcnRyYW4g Z21ha2UKVVNFX1hPUkc9CXgxMQpVU0VfR0w9CQlnbHUKTUFLRUZJTEU9CW1ha2VmaWxlCk1BS0Vf Sk9CU19VTlNBRkU9eWVzCgpDRkxBR1MrPQktRCR7T1BTWVM6dHV9IC1ERE9CQUNLIC1ESEFTVElN RVIgLURDT0xPUl9PRkZTRVQ9MC4wIFwKCQktSSR7TE9DQUxCQVNFfS9pbmNsdWRlIC1Xbm8tcmV0 dXJuLXR5cGUKClBPUlRET0NTPQkqClBPUlREQVRBPQkqClBMSVNUX0ZJTEVTPQliaW4vYW1iZm9y IGJpbi9nbW9sZGVuIGJpbi9tb2xkZW4gYmluL3N1cmYgYmluL21vbGRlbm9nbAoKUE9SVFNDT1VU PQlsaW1pdDpeNVwuMFwuCgpPUFRJT05TX0RFRklORT0JCURBVEEgRE9DUwpPUFRJT05TX0RFRkFV TFQ9CURBVEEKCnBvc3QtcGF0Y2g6CglAJHtSRUlOUExBQ0VfQ01EfSAtZSBcCgkJJ3N8XkNDIHwj Q0MgfCA7IFwKCQkgc3xeRkMgfCNGQyB8IDsgXAoJCSBzfC91c3IvWDExUjZ8JHtMT0NBTEJBU0V9 fCA7IFwKCQkgc3wtbFhtdXx8IDsgXAoJCSAvZGVwZW5kL3N8XnwjfCcgJHtXUktTUkN9L21ha2Vm aWxlCgpwb3N0LWNvbmZpZ3VyZToKCUAke0VDSE9fTVNHfSAiKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioi CglAJHtFQ0hPX01TR30gIioqICBJZiB5b3Ugd2FudCB0byB1c2UgYSBsYXJnZXIgTU9MREVOLCIK CUAke0VDSE9fTVNHfSAiKiogIGVkaXQgY2hhbmdlX3BhcmFtZXRlci5zaCBhbmQgcnVuIGl0LCIK CUAke0VDSE9fTVNHfSAiKiogIGJlZm9yZSBcJ21ha2UgYnVpbGRcJy4iCglAJHtFQ0hPX01TR30g IioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqIgoKZG8taW5zdGFsbDoKLmZvciBpIGluIG1vbGRlbiBnbW9s ZGVuIG1vbGRlbm9nbAoJKGNkICR7V1JLU1JDfSAmJiAke0lOU1RBTExfUFJPR1JBTX0gJHtpfSAk e1NUQUdFRElSfSR7UFJFRklYfS9iaW4pCi5lbmRmb3IKLmZvciBpIGluIGFtYmZvciBzdXJmCgko Y2QgJHtXUktTUkN9LyR7aX0gJiYgJHtJTlNUQUxMX1BST0dSQU19ICR7aX0gJHtTVEFHRURJUn0v JHtQUkVGSVh9L2JpbikKLmVuZGZvcgoJQCR7TUtESVJ9ICR7U1RBR0VESVJ9JHtEQVRBRElSfS90 ZXN0CgkoY2QgJHtXUktTUkN9L3Rlc3QgJiYgJHtJTlNUQUxMX0RBVEF9ICogJHtTVEFHRURJUn0k e0RBVEFESVJ9L3Rlc3QpCglAJHtNS0RJUn0gJHtTVEFHRURJUn0ke0RBVEFESVJ9L3V0aWxzCgko Y2QgJHtXUktTUkN9L3V0aWxzICYmICAke0lOU1RBTExfREFUQX0gKiAke1NUQUdFRElSfSR7REFU QURJUn0vdXRpbHMpCglAJHtNS0RJUn0gJHtTVEFHRURJUn0ke0RPQ1NESVJ9CgkoY2QgJHtXUktT UkN9L2RvYyAmJiAke0lOU1RBTExfREFUQX0gKiAke1NUQUdFRElSfSR7RE9DU0RJUn0pCgouaW5j bHVkZSA8YnNkLnBvcnQubWs+Cg== --001a113496d08a03fb0502570e67-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 20:32:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17A641EA for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 20:32:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C69961A87 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 20:32:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1XQ0BQ-0006wk-Mv; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 22:32:36 +0200 Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 22:32:36 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Matthias Andree Subject: Re: net/ntop strip: ... Invalid operation Message-ID: <20140905203236.GB9400@home.opsec.eu> References: <20140904123253.3ce66f73b13e27196ea55c04@3dresearch.com> <540A0781.90609@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <540A0781.90609@gmx.de> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 20:32:39 -0000 Hi! > > I understand that net/ntop is unmaintained, but someone perhaps still > > could advise... > > Another suggestion, after checking the website: did you try ntopng yet? > Would that work for you? It is already ported, and has a maintainer > address on it. Hmm, the Makefile says: BROKEN= no distinfo provided for some of the distfiles This can probably be fixed, but... -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 6 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 20:35:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A72E29B for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 20:35:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 028071A9A for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 20:35:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mandree.no-ip.org ([78.49.247.146]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LoEwL-1Y1mt51wVt-00gDA1 for ; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 22:35:34 +0200 Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost6.localdomain6 [IPv6:::1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F3E623CE71 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 22:35:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <540A1E95.4000802@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 22:35:33 +0200 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: net/ntop strip: ... Invalid operation References: <20140904123253.3ce66f73b13e27196ea55c04@3dresearch.com> <540A0781.90609@gmx.de> <20140905203236.GB9400@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <20140905203236.GB9400@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:H9zwPk204F4BsPgKPe+YkMGaYKxN87Nk3kwbrISlNGNqmChaHj2 xvIf6pSaIAIkVD4rjtICDqku51eulldiw3nXKO6dEt33aK/upvKOtcJ/cFIao/liQkaGnsp nRnYwUf0cwpHB9YoYr1XGBoAMJZvPD/3n4zTWmWV5/9spB2k0w7iXZLA7ZLj0pQnjRVEjKh iuPC7/McCWxdeFeKSDS6w== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 20:35:37 -0000 Am 05.09.2014 um 22:32 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: > Hi! > >>> I understand that net/ntop is unmaintained, but someone perhaps still >>> could advise... >> >> Another suggestion, after checking the website: did you try ntopng yet? >> Would that work for you? It is already ported, and has a maintainer >> address on it. > > Hmm, the Makefile says: > > BROKEN= no distinfo provided for some of the distfiles > > This can probably be fixed, but... > Apparently it needs a bit love, upstream seems rather active given the latest file release dates in August. Haven't checked in depth. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 20:47:03 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D26D8658 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 20:47:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C2F81BC5 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 20:47:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1XQ0PQ-00073h-6f; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 22:47:04 +0200 Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 22:47:04 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Matthias Andree Subject: Re: net/ntop strip: ... Invalid operation Message-ID: <20140905204704.GC9400@home.opsec.eu> References: <20140904123253.3ce66f73b13e27196ea55c04@3dresearch.com> <540A0781.90609@gmx.de> <20140905203236.GB9400@home.opsec.eu> <540A1E95.4000802@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <540A1E95.4000802@gmx.de> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 20:47:03 -0000 Hi! > >>> I understand that net/ntop is unmaintained, but someone perhaps still > >>> could advise... > >> Another suggestion, after checking the website: did you try ntopng yet? > Apparently it needs a bit love, upstream seems rather active given the > latest file release dates in August. Haven't checked in depth. I had a quick look at it, it needs more than a little bit to get it up to 1.2.0. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 6 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 21:15:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B854DC9 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 21:15:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0BCB1E6D for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 21:15:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.101] ([87.139.233.65]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LxPNC-1YRSAg03OU-016sug; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 23:15:00 +0200 Message-ID: <540A27D2.5090403@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 23:14:58 +0200 From: olli hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Splitting devel/subversion into SEVERAL ports -- how fine-grained do we want to see it? References: <1438330868.20140608001618@serebryakov.spb.ru> <540880D3.6070105@jrv.org> In-Reply-To: <540880D3.6070105@jrv.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:LX+9nY5A4NiRo0dmjOzjsvgC2enmC/Vv45DRQ9KAWaR8lJJqTNd XIHEHx1guQDtO3BV6GbWTEr6Olekd0ttSC2pWboFQzmLYncxedoEPa4M+7CO9oxPhJUherI yeApnC8HsLVrlJQyCNi4m8SeXEvZuDl3VMfTqbtTTJpXSn4Aui9RkY4oGBYvESBRiDBrdlp Xu9GTzG+clfaV9LGzwsLQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Cc: lev@FreeBSD.org, "James R. Van Artsdalen" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 21:15:09 -0000 On 2014-09-04 17:10, James R. Van Artsdalen wrote: > So how does port subversion work now? I don't get mod_dav_svn installed > and I don't see a knob for it. > > There is port www/mod_dav_svn but devel/subversion doesn't seem to > reference it, and www/mod_dav_svn just gives errors when apache24 tries > to start.(needs shared memory support that or some such). > > port devel/subversion does have the mod_dav_svn code in the work tree; > it just isn't installed. Hi James, the port was separated, so devel/subversion can be installed via pkg from pre build packages without having apache as dependency. Unluckily in the first apache24 revision not all required modules where ON per default but this was fixed some weeks ago. In case you don't use custom apache24 options just run `make rmconfig && make config' inside the www/apache24 port directory to pick up the new default module list. To compare the options before after run before 'make showconfig > cfg.old' and after reconfigure the OPTIONS 'make showconfig > cfg.new' To build the apache module install devel/subversion and then www/mod_dav_svn (there are pre build packages available, `pkg install devel/subversion www/mod_dav_svn') After installing apache24 compare your etc/apache24/httpd.conf with the httpd.conf from your new build (/usr/local/share/examples/apache24/httpd.conf) E.g vimdiff /usr/local/etc/apache24/httpd.conf /usr/local/share/examples/apache24/httpd.conf and merge missing LoadModule directives into existing etc/apache24/httpd.conf A possible configuration file candidate that will be used by the subversion port in the future can be found here (replace %%APACHEMODDIR%% with libexec/apache24) http://people.freebsd.org/~ohauer/diffs/220_subversion.conf.sample.in As soon as pkg support sub packages it is possible the port will change again since then it is no longer required to split the port into pices. -- hth. olli From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 22:01:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F152F7D1 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 22:01:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B98BA149C for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 22:01:25 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: , , X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=SrMSGYy0 c=1 sm=1 a=uNsD4W5u/UlQopoDAqU1YA==:17 a=TM20W-5uK7UA:10 a=AaUjGI9IrlcA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=OA2lqS22AAAA:8 a=f_1Pb7EEZHZ1AjP01qwA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=w1eBHzmbeNIA:10 a=4a3djk6DZCAA:10 a=9-srukr40dkA:10 a=uNsD4W5u/UlQopoDAqU1YA==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine X-Authed-Username: cm9iZXJ0aHVmZkByY24uY29t Authentication-Results: smtp02.rcn.cmh.synacor.com header.from=roberthuff@rcn.com; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp02.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.mail=roberthuff@rcn.com; spf=neutral; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp02.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.user=roberthuff; auth=pass (PLAIN) Received-SPF: neutral (smtp02.rcn.cmh.synacor.com: 209.6.39.223 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of rcn.com) Received: from [209.6.39.223] ([209.6.39.223:64858] helo=jerusalem.litteratus.org) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.2.43620 r(Platform:3.6.2.0)) with ESMTPA id 45/18-32522-EA23A045; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 18:01:18 -0400 Message-ID: <540A32AD.7080700@rcn.com> Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 18:01:17 -0400 From: Robert Huff User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: package availability Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 22:01:26 -0000 I'm looking for a package of fftw3-3.3.3_2, built for amd64 with default options. "pkg search fftw3" reports 3.3.3_1. When is 3.3.3_1 likely to become available? Respectfully, Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 22:10:08 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36047C96 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 22:10:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B07901518 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 22:10:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mandree.no-ip.org ([78.49.247.146]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MNIAz-1XSUfl2fQv-006zHB for ; Sat, 06 Sep 2014 00:10:04 +0200 Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost6.localdomain6 [IPv6:::1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C1B123CE71 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 00:10:03 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <540A34BB.3080704@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 00:10:03 +0200 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: net/ntop strip: ... Invalid operation References: <20140904123253.3ce66f73b13e27196ea55c04@3dresearch.com> <540A0781.90609@gmx.de> <20140905203236.GB9400@home.opsec.eu> <540A1E95.4000802@gmx.de> <20140905204704.GC9400@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <20140905204704.GC9400@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:2jUsGhjeBdKbMrvTvIww29jAiRNhF2YUW5e38a5TrjKCUYteKJx Bdp0rW/Ibn53YpZCSFozWAE2UdPlHTKVXUCHza+6od6v1CXw/sQdNmBl+4X4VPqFHEbPf/q giWLJVv6T9UgsTxxFrn2gKImbBR5VvsCXNo7rzqPurHYmMz+2FitGEIr3w0OtnTIhOlJulN 27HTfOiAJ9zICAvxa0DLQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 22:10:08 -0000 Am 05.09.2014 um 22:47 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: > Hi! > >>>>> I understand that net/ntop is unmaintained, but someone perhaps still >>>>> could advise... > >>>> Another suggestion, after checking the website: did you try ntopng yet? > >> Apparently it needs a bit love, upstream seems rather active given the >> latest file release dates in August. Haven't checked in depth. > > I had a quick look at it, it needs more than a little bit to get it > up to 1.2.0. > I believe SVN r367396 fixes the net/ntop build problem, at the price of an additional requisite package, namely binutils, on 8.x releases (or all versions before OSVERSION reached 900033, for that matter). It also fixes a problem when trying to build WITH_SSP_PORTS=yes for hardening. Closes Bug #192047. I am not bumping the portrevision because this fixes build failures only. Janos, thank you for the report. Try upgrading your ports tree a short while after I've sent this message; the port is up to date if it uses .include at its very end. HTH From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 22:52:49 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C30769DD; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 22:52:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from spectrum.skysmurf.nl (spectrum.skysmurf.nl [82.95.125.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 506EC1B00; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 22:52:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from spectrum.skysmurf.nl (spectrum.skysmurf.nl [82.95.125.145]) by spectrum.skysmurf.nl (8.14.9/8.14.9) with SMTP id s85MnAvD052747; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 00:49:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@skysmurf.nl) Received: by spectrum.skysmurf.nl (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 06 Sep 2014 00:49:10 +0200 Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 00:49:10 +0200 From: "A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven" To: Robert Huff Subject: Re: package availability Message-ID: <20140905224910.GA52658@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> References: <540A32AD.7080700@rcn.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <540A32AD.7080700@rcn.com> X-PGP-Key: http://www.skysmurf.nl/~fonz/fonz_pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, bf@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 22:52:49 -0000 --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Robert Huff wrote: > I'm looking for a package of fftw3-3.3.3_2, built for amd64 with > default options. > "pkg search fftw3" reports 3.3.3_1. > When is 3.3.3_1 likely to become available? You probably meant: when is 3.3.3_2 likely to become available? That sounds like something you should ask the maintainer. I've CC'ed him/her. Also keep in mind that once a *port* has been updated it may take some days before new binary *packages* are built. AvW --=20 Imbibo, ergo sum. --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUCj3mAAoJEAfP7gJTaCe8a/cP/0sJXaXK0SXXz/ZAizUDAHbW 7l6ODJpA0uhsCEh0gyyF5dpdR+NUl5zpY9ydgRVD9OPiNZ9loQC9mofbvgD55DHi nCA8+G6bnKQ0pxqVhOHjrYkkb9kTQTY/QUGOAyamEViuu+cDlKFKr/85nvEVcbEw Ab2MbXl3wuBs+11AoX76fruDwCQ4+1dmI83ebBTjXEsiD/Zn9bVTD9FLkzDPn7+k t34FFAVmabZnIx9RRsr/so5qgjhshXbOCkm9djbaMvBd0hRbyqhOlVlbmxeslmsI jf1jUnN1jxxL12yMCoOoZzGLrml3kQstkcYXssS88bRSP0Z3jjBZUQ535it4WLJm XQBu1/8+5Re/kPafy6r7yuLfY3kUl/qALNApzkWl7xglc4U+2YGoR48vIDxrt2NG YPi9d4RR9FBjXzEU4YwRe6NhrptR8LdxCtE9g2CivWY1t3KtgHzsdJyULvX+4FqW v5UAQPWXNnVC4X6tAom6OWWJ424NhoNMkwKIms8zqPiYUYI1tZYK+ns8w0GEzoqC jcoUjz7oZNZpyYIhm0kYJ6u5lWtoGQ4bigZTRt89KqpJT9l5XrXlk+JPjdjzGd5Q 1nYDPpLqUZITQBJdba+is2uJAyIDHJWWCKwhJvdkd7Ff83Kl3FV3p+DdbOQuW+kK FAefMcBj9IONVuWlgR2m =C5CY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 23:05:43 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66343D33; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 23:05:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x231.google.com (mail-we0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA0031C40; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 23:05:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id u56so12258572wes.8 for ; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 16:05:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=agpvS2xggm6agTQvcJcjCwcYIigIdkm2W5PTGlagKnU=; b=XU9/X+DgEtnpR3whFAkXnVSVeKLJRqp0KQuluwF4l84UDvXKTgGfrSG3MXRs6kNkuO 71/T9r7zckslIVSr5saFUzuDSLaBJ15eAY+4L1yK1DBzOs05/GbEoiMcWCbqrkQSRJEJ dPYujCcFGq9o1cVkZIRCRO3y4zl6MvNV2dDXwAnLfAhfJ4etQgIi+z7798LiY6ooGmbX 2H4kMbODjyrOVcx35FQxEnsBNuvJK/xENPh2/teovQ1oysD0x2Os4LiHkvJRBDdIN4bQ o1PSHYBDWVbSAEz2X+pyErcKlRI/OtobAXxxTYBf+Z1wiLg03rDe6zTv5TiqN4pFk8Y3 vYfQ== X-Received: by 10.194.61.65 with SMTP id n1mr16964325wjr.19.1409958340998; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 16:05:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id lv7sm3247325wic.16.2014.09.05.16.05.39 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 05 Sep 2014 16:05:39 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 01:05:37 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: "A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven" Subject: Re: package availability Message-ID: <20140905230537.GF40535@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <540A32AD.7080700@rcn.com> <20140905224910.GA52658@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yH1ZJFh+qWm+VodA" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140905224910.GA52658@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Robert Huff , bf@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 23:05:43 -0000 --yH1ZJFh+qWm+VodA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 12:49:10AM +0200, A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven wrote: > Robert Huff wrote: >=20 > > I'm looking for a package of fftw3-3.3.3_2, built for amd64 with > > default options. > > "pkg search fftw3" reports 3.3.3_1. > > When is 3.3.3_1 likely to become available? >=20 > You probably meant: when is 3.3.3_2 likely to become available? >=20 > That sounds like something you should ask the maintainer. I've CC'ed > him/her. Also keep in mind that once a *port* has been updated it may take > some days before new binary *packages* are built. >=20 > AvW >=20 > --=20 > Imbibo, ergo sum. Right now packages are built weekly (build start every wednesday 1am UTC) o= nce built they are automatically published and available to users within the ne= xt days regards, Bapt --yH1ZJFh+qWm+VodA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlQKQcEACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzZwQCfUCoxhVg1Ea5Uebr75G+xYGoE TTwAoLmBSimYhl3cEtKUyUc3QM8FCUEC =I1mG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yH1ZJFh+qWm+VodA-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 00:21:28 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E41E3A6; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 00:21:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.in-addr.com (mail.in-addr.com [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:61e8::2525:2525]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D931D13E5; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 00:21:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gjp by mail.in-addr.com with local (Exim 4.84 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1XQ3kr-0001zs-F8; Sat, 06 Sep 2014 01:21:25 +0100 Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 01:21:25 +0100 From: Gary Palmer To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: devel/glib12 and devel/glib20 Message-ID: <20140906002125.GB10423@in-addr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gpalmer@freebsd.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.in-addr.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 00:21:28 -0000 Hi, I upgraded to pkgng recently, and prior to this I had both devel/glib12 and devel/glib20 happily co-existing. Now I am told that I can't have both installed at the same time. This was fine with both glib-2.36.3_3 and glib-1.2.10_13 until this last updated to glib-2.36.3_4 which svn log shows as "Change PYTHON_FEATURES to USE_PYTHON" Is this correct? Can I only have one or the other now? Thanks, Gary From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 00:34:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A6DF5C3; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 00:34:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x22f.google.com (mail-wg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEEB915D0; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 00:34:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id z12so12482588wgg.30 for ; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 17:34:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=n8w4UJPrkq1v0nSwtl+wyQ9pM9r1WH6vDwz6Hk/kJbI=; b=vaYBOL8WvHsLKInqGc2HXVtQ3wwpLCY1Pe2/CGT5gYSqWVof7hOB0Gwb6eBC2zKYvM +I3rWhmJ2KqTW+GVZ8E6wD32bNJ66Ve8NI3/LUHiV1nipW/DLr8Dbh7bJs+510G6YMQ+ HnGNdPAQa2VDGl8wxCE+IVSJF7Aquw57mCsJue2sz4vh1Y6c036GcBlNsVLdF7M6oAV5 69zKj97GD/cyo1gsf/JwN0HKHfV/w/BL5GJHJZ2FkooOZpaAxUuTpekXy4himRIxpTWu PYaRUYsxRCeqOCOIyux0EZcYOHzjIHAvo/D53QUmrMRj1wjclmtIOl2w9QXRMcLwLbWr InCg== X-Received: by 10.194.173.234 with SMTP id bn10mr18192241wjc.81.1409963664041; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 17:34:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ju1sm2988242wjc.1.2014.09.05.17.34.19 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 05 Sep 2014 17:34:19 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 02:34:17 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Gary Palmer Subject: Re: devel/glib12 and devel/glib20 Message-ID: <20140906003417.GH40535@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20140906002125.GB10423@in-addr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0OWHXb1mYLuhj1Ox" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140906002125.GB10423@in-addr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 00:34:26 -0000 --0OWHXb1mYLuhj1Ox Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 01:21:25AM +0100, Gary Palmer wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I upgraded to pkgng recently, and prior to this I had both devel/glib12= =20 > and devel/glib20 happily co-existing. Now I am told that I can't > have both installed at the same time. This was fine with both > glib-2.36.3_3 and glib-1.2.10_13 until this last updated to glib-2.36.3_4 > which svn log shows as "Change PYTHON_FEATURES to USE_PYTHON" >=20 > Is this correct? Can I only have one or the other now? What tell you you can't have both? $ pkg info -x glib glib-2.36.3_3 glib12-1.2.10_13 regards, Bapt --0OWHXb1mYLuhj1Ox Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlQKVokACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExeaQCffVb7psI3a7la/wZX6M4mMWvj 664AnRYUPXbgA3I0oSZoymBVvZDDRf5L =w+YK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0OWHXb1mYLuhj1Ox-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 00:36:13 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEB487FA; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 00:36:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.in-addr.com (mail.in-addr.com [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:61e8::2525:2525]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A304815DE; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 00:36:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gjp by mail.in-addr.com with local (Exim 4.84 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1XQ3z9-00022F-Ut; Sat, 06 Sep 2014 01:36:11 +0100 Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 01:36:11 +0100 From: Gary Palmer To: Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: devel/glib12 and devel/glib20 Message-ID: <20140906003611.GC10423@in-addr.com> References: <20140906002125.GB10423@in-addr.com> <20140906003417.GH40535@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140906003417.GH40535@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gpalmer@freebsd.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.in-addr.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 00:36:14 -0000 On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 02:34:17AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 01:21:25AM +0100, Gary Palmer wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I upgraded to pkgng recently, and prior to this I had both devel/glib12 > > and devel/glib20 happily co-existing. Now I am told that I can't > > have both installed at the same time. This was fine with both > > glib-2.36.3_3 and glib-1.2.10_13 until this last updated to glib-2.36.3_4 > > which svn log shows as "Change PYTHON_FEATURES to USE_PYTHON" > > > > Is this correct? Can I only have one or the other now? > > What tell you you can't have both? > > $ pkg info -x glib > glib-2.36.3_3 > glib12-1.2.10_13 > > regards, > Bapt root@host:/usr/ports/devel/glib20> make install ===> Installing for glib-2.36.3_4 ===> glib-2.36.3_4 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.7 - found ===> glib-2.36.3_4 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.14.4 - found ===> glib-2.36.3_4 depends on shared library: libpcre.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.3) ===> glib-2.36.3_4 depends on shared library: libffi.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libffi.so.6.0.1) ===> glib-2.36.3_4 depends on shared library: libintl.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libintl.so.9) ===> glib-2.36.3_4 depends on shared library: libiconv.so.3 - found (/usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3) ===> glib-2.36.3_4 depends on shared library: libicui18n.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libicui18n.so.53.1) ===> Checking if glib already installed ===> An older version of glib is already installed (glib-1.2.10_13) You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. If you really wish to overwrite the old port of glib without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER" in your environment or the "make install" command line. *** [check-already-installed] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/glib20. *** [install] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/glib20. Thanks, Gary From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 00:49:20 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B828CA21; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 00:49:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x232.google.com (mail-we0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28ED517E9; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 00:49:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id q58so921922wes.37 for ; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 17:49:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ggGwO7eq2xRIEmH7MbB4mYg8J2c9lXbxtTuuY/5lkXw=; b=0VVjSnp8QqBxmgGl5uwWjTlhbyqr/9qe78HsFmRu/7e6eACrF7RVUQ26/vSTsPWwc1 O4J3z2ULSVQGgeQRcQE9XxA3tNMvKLf7PqqoysSm5Ljd4NRxyTgg72hoxK3ehdvmuzXc oVtfKW12SanajJAHqUWXouxfgcL3ljxhnUyyIaAeqrZ1QVAk2ijxJpw6VEkeF39PmRX/ cW3EbLho3sLb6vepqp6cyELJjtQ1GMHILMnSZc5eXEW+5ufLLwVSpdaE4idwtkpyVla3 GhGkDJDWiJ8/DAAGW0XbY8e4YomOj7MU3T2JmlHdcPm3MpG/EGVyVqpanfezpmwyoswq UBWQ== X-Received: by 10.194.80.9 with SMTP id n9mr18483657wjx.57.1409964558444; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 17:49:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id p1sm2992282wjy.22.2014.09.05.17.49.16 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 05 Sep 2014 17:49:16 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 02:49:14 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Gary Palmer Subject: Re: devel/glib12 and devel/glib20 Message-ID: <20140906004914.GI40535@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20140906002125.GB10423@in-addr.com> <20140906003417.GH40535@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140906003611.GC10423@in-addr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fmvA4kSBHQVZhkR6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140906003611.GC10423@in-addr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 00:49:20 -0000 --fmvA4kSBHQVZhkR6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 01:36:11AM +0100, Gary Palmer wrote: > On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 02:34:17AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 01:21:25AM +0100, Gary Palmer wrote: > > > Hi, > > >=20 > > > I upgraded to pkgng recently, and prior to this I had both devel/glib= 12=20 > > > and devel/glib20 happily co-existing. Now I am told that I can't > > > have both installed at the same time. This was fine with both > > > glib-2.36.3_3 and glib-1.2.10_13 until this last updated to glib-2.36= =2E3_4 > > > which svn log shows as "Change PYTHON_FEATURES to USE_PYTHON" > > >=20 > > > Is this correct? Can I only have one or the other now? > >=20 > > What tell you you can't have both? > >=20 > > $ pkg info -x glib > > glib-2.36.3_3 > > glib12-1.2.10_13 > >=20 > > regards, > > Bapt >=20 > root@host:/usr/ports/devel/glib20> make install > =3D=3D=3D> Installing for glib-2.36.3_4 > =3D=3D=3D> glib-2.36.3_4 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.7 - fo= und > =3D=3D=3D> glib-2.36.3_4 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.14.4 - f= ound > =3D=3D=3D> glib-2.36.3_4 depends on shared library: libpcre.so - found = (/usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.3) > =3D=3D=3D> glib-2.36.3_4 depends on shared library: libffi.so - found (= /usr/local/lib/libffi.so.6.0.1) > =3D=3D=3D> glib-2.36.3_4 depends on shared library: libintl.so - found = (/usr/local/lib/libintl.so.9) > =3D=3D=3D> glib-2.36.3_4 depends on shared library: libiconv.so.3 - fou= nd (/usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3) > =3D=3D=3D> glib-2.36.3_4 depends on shared library: libicui18n.so - fou= nd (/usr/local/lib/libicui18n.so.53.1) > =3D=3D=3D> Checking if glib already installed > =3D=3D=3D> An older version of glib is already installed (glib-1.2.10_1= 3) > You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again > by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. > If you really wish to overwrite the old port of glib > without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER" > in your environment or the "make install" command line. > *** [check-already-installed] Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/glib20. > *** [install] Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/glib20. >=20 Right this is because you have installed glib-1.2 long ago since it has been renamed glib12, just deinstall glib reinstall both glib12 and glib20 and it= will work, I'm bumping portrevision users will catch up this change has they sho= uld have. regards, Bapt --fmvA4kSBHQVZhkR6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlQKWgoACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzpjACgkgWXP/vfrK3fc9foXoMBHSvg z+MAn25+AYSdOel6OWJP0WxQ1/z8hmCL =OztI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fmvA4kSBHQVZhkR6-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 01:00:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14AAFB08; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 01:00:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.in-addr.com (mail.in-addr.com [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:61e8::2525:2525]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB0DA18AF; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 01:00:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gjp by mail.in-addr.com with local (Exim 4.84 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1XQ4MI-00025w-TZ; Sat, 06 Sep 2014 02:00:06 +0100 Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 02:00:06 +0100 From: Gary Palmer To: Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: devel/glib12 and devel/glib20 Message-ID: <20140906010006.GD10423@in-addr.com> References: <20140906002125.GB10423@in-addr.com> <20140906003417.GH40535@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140906003611.GC10423@in-addr.com> <20140906004914.GI40535@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140906004914.GI40535@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gpalmer@freebsd.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.in-addr.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 01:00:09 -0000 On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 02:49:14AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 01:36:11AM +0100, Gary Palmer wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 02:34:17AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 01:21:25AM +0100, Gary Palmer wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I upgraded to pkgng recently, and prior to this I had both devel/glib12 > > > > and devel/glib20 happily co-existing. Now I am told that I can't > > > > have both installed at the same time. This was fine with both > > > > glib-2.36.3_3 and glib-1.2.10_13 until this last updated to glib-2.36.3_4 > > > > which svn log shows as "Change PYTHON_FEATURES to USE_PYTHON" > > > > > > > > Is this correct? Can I only have one or the other now? > > > > > > What tell you you can't have both? > > > > > > $ pkg info -x glib > > > glib-2.36.3_3 > > > glib12-1.2.10_13 > > > > > > regards, > > > Bapt > > > > root@host:/usr/ports/devel/glib20> make install > > ===> Installing for glib-2.36.3_4 > > ===> glib-2.36.3_4 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.7 - found > > ===> glib-2.36.3_4 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.14.4 - found > > ===> glib-2.36.3_4 depends on shared library: libpcre.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.3) > > ===> glib-2.36.3_4 depends on shared library: libffi.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libffi.so.6.0.1) > > ===> glib-2.36.3_4 depends on shared library: libintl.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libintl.so.9) > > ===> glib-2.36.3_4 depends on shared library: libiconv.so.3 - found (/usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3) > > ===> glib-2.36.3_4 depends on shared library: libicui18n.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libicui18n.so.53.1) > > ===> Checking if glib already installed > > ===> An older version of glib is already installed (glib-1.2.10_13) > > You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again > > by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. > > If you really wish to overwrite the old port of glib > > without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER" > > in your environment or the "make install" command line. > > *** [check-already-installed] Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/glib20. > > *** [install] Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/glib20. > > > > Right this is because you have installed glib-1.2 long ago since it has been > renamed glib12, just deinstall glib reinstall both glib12 and glib20 and it will > work, I'm bumping portrevision users will catch up this change has they should > have. Thanks. I ran portmaster devel/glib12 portmaster devel/glib20 and that seems to have fixed it. Had the same problem with math/eigen2 and math/eigen3, fixed the same way. Thanks, Gary From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 01:34:13 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44223523 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 01:34:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B0D21CD1 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 01:34:12 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: , , X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=SrMSGYy0 c=1 sm=1 a=uNsD4W5u/UlQopoDAqU1YA==:17 a=TM20W-5uK7UA:10 a=efP94StqYEMA:10 a=AaUjGI9IrlcA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=OA2lqS22AAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=GS0LBMRVYiBeXEyWo9cA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=foe3nJr4XdsA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=wDOiWsz1jWcA:10 a=VpDqnxDfXYYA:10 a=uNsD4W5u/UlQopoDAqU1YA==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine X-Authed-Username: cm9iZXJ0aHVmZkByY24uY29t Authentication-Results: smtp02.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.mail=roberthuff@rcn.com; spf=neutral; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp02.rcn.cmh.synacor.com header.from=roberthuff@rcn.com; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp02.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.user=roberthuff; auth=pass (PLAIN) Received-SPF: neutral (smtp02.rcn.cmh.synacor.com: 209.6.39.223 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of rcn.com) Received: from [209.6.39.223] ([209.6.39.223:60159] helo=jerusalem.litteratus.org) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.2.43620 r(Platform:3.6.2.0)) with ESMTPA id 91/1C-32522-2946A045; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 21:34:10 -0400 Message-ID: <540A6491.1080403@rcn.com> Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 21:34:09 -0400 From: Robert Huff User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: package availability Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 01:34:13 -0000 "Baptiste Daroussin" writes: > Right now packages are built weekly (build start every wednesday 1am > UTC) once built they are automatically published and available to > users within the next days. Understood. I will keep trying. If it hasn't shown up by Monday ... I will probably be back. :-) Respectfully, Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 09:04:20 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1E50644 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 09:04:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3536A1AF4 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 09:04:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.239] ([212.98.32.54]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MGRhs-1XdRTL1dNA-00DGpO; Sat, 06 Sep 2014 11:04:15 +0200 Message-ID: <540ACE6D.3040001@gmx.net> Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 11:05:49 +0200 From: Simon Wright User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: apache@FreeBSD.org Subject: Any update planned for www/mod_log_sql2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:9IWFSHKZgBeauPBo+zrYH5UzIiThoW5bkGKfYGRKEnrLC7jf6hk 0b1r4trk3zYNxzAosvinM2f7xk4W6pitorMBpfKi+7Y3W4WZVDntVhTeF6kjOC6rcdvNNkD 20Y7tXmguTaZuuS5/zCSkLVJ9lGo0G48iimFbJpkA5ZjSDKyUUC92rkPQVfCAlULPlKoEJn wczdsSbm2jQv3MR3DRNcw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 09:04:20 -0000 Hi Team! I was wondering whether mod_log_sql2 will be or can be updated to work with the new default of Apache24? Apache22 is specified explictly in the Makefile. I'm not sure whether mod_log_mysql is a replacement/substitute but that is also linked explicitly to Apache22. An indication of any time line or migration path would be much appreciated! Many thanks. Simon Wright. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 10:43:16 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4006CF4B for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 10:43:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BD251486 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 10:43:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s86AhG7X042525 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 10:43:16 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id s86AhGPg042524; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 10:43:16 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201409061043.s86AhGPg042524@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 10:43:16 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 10:43:16 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ benchmarks/siege | 3.0.7 | 3.0.8 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ games/childsplay | 2.6.3 | 2.6.4 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ german/pecl-konto_check | 2.98 | 5.5 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 11:07:46 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64EE8943 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 11:07:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B5A41827 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 11:07:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s86B7kZa046238 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 11:07:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193383] [panic] /devel/subversion/ kernel panic when I update source tree or ports tree Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 11:07:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: sasamotikomi@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Needs Triage X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 11:07:46 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193383 sasamotikomi@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, | |lev@FreeBSD.org, | |sasamotikomi@gmail.com Summary|[panic] svn panic when I |[panic] /devel/subversion/ |update source tree or ports |kernel panic when I update |tree |source tree or ports tree -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 11:15:10 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 685CED11 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 11:15:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EF851945 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 11:15:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s86BFAVU087052 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 11:15:10 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193383] [panic] /devel/subversion/ kernel panic when I update source tree or ports tree Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 11:15:10 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: lev@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Discussion X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 11:15:10 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193383 Lev A. Serebryakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Needs Triage |In Discussion --- Comment #1 from Lev A. Serebryakov --- Are you sure it is not hardware (memory/storage/network) problem? Kernel stacktrace shows very strange backtrace. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 12:18:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37E09431 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 12:18:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x236.google.com (mail-la0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B79A61F25 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 12:18:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id b17so15507077lan.27 for ; Sat, 06 Sep 2014 05:18:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=3VnDqRGAXNa7Eg4Vm3e7LTSiHMbjERVcxY383L92JQ4=; b=NGGe+QtHpnYhDlkNRMAPO4Qw3n4wQQ+4ZSiGyI689C7UrE1ebpKfK7frxzXO1raL/5 7Hyd7Bx+imw103QgQu8y4z26JMx5SAoBNUw4od+7i1/wTiYApykEuWKBiy0qS4YKNDRR iDhDA3v67zWXUgGHTX307z532wd0FwualXMCIv7a7Qc1tL1l6stwKH0aO+tYS2ozWocI 0GJ8+6YUiqcfc+qak+gH8+UVHViziILyTUNXFENVM+Gys7M6MU/pK0gy4CI5fz8f27ju VjHysI5RSFozozoTnBFXxaVhnpZRdU2a0tSB+jSsa2YqrZSy+0skcsV19oh45Rrh3S9m B8mA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.153.4.39 with SMTP id cb7mr17400069lad.19.1410005918693; Sat, 06 Sep 2014 05:18:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.229.225 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 05:18:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 16:18:38 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: About Freebsd port net/ntopng From: Fedor Dikarev To: Muhammad Moinur Rahman <5u623l20@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 12:18:41 -0000 Hello Muhammad Moinur Rahman! I've found that you are maintainer of net/ntopng freebsd port. I've tried to build ntopng and found that it's marked as BROKEN. So I started to analyse what's broken and find right URL for distfiles. And also I've made some patches so now it can be build without gcc (I had build successfully using clang on FreeBSD 10). And today while I try to reproduce all of this I found that ntopng 1.2.1 was released just few hours ago. So what your opinion, what will be better: should I send patches to you and there will be net/ntopng11 in ports or upgrade net/ntopng to 1.2.1 is just enough? -- Fedor Dikarev From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 12:53:28 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0901D08 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 12:53:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-x22c.google.com (mail-oi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B97441329 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 12:53:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f44.google.com with SMTP id x69so3505621oia.3 for ; Sat, 06 Sep 2014 05:53:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=L1tQV3VC3ck4vAc6Aw82+ZnwK/ccmQOTxRnRoKE++oQ=; b=SMyVoXUT9u600YqtCtIyjNYhanbCqJdpmOVNjN9WZqJUSK8Q0meda8ZgURPtUzi2Ba owIyJ6yYedarsNZaUE2hFjDi7cKzF0GVeG+G4OtbiZmkRnmKMIN8Z14WHZqB3fncBP44 9RVrNdhiqUarNap5SAlLWA3nVqSA4Ve0PsfOVKvIjyVUpcUnXUOvbdwoj1fDkwBo4HLj YWpqUCtivXOKtXAixP91lB4Bw1Nub4+v7uQHqnVy+AvaqBebrr9HueBW2lp6my2oX6l8 w+i5p2e5QrWedq0H0cqewXo18teW+vK3MGKe3fdC1yARhPYQ9EJirNTQodkKROJJ9zVo V9Kg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.32.5 with SMTP id e5mr1157254obi.73.1410008006916; Sat, 06 Sep 2014 05:53:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.59.193 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 05:53:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 18:53:26 +0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: About Freebsd port net/ntopng From: Muhammad Moinur Rahman <5u623l20@gmail.com> To: Fedor Dikarev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 12:53:28 -0000 =E2=80=8BHi, I am already working on upgrading to the latest. Nearly finished. Within a day or two I will submit it. BR, Muhammad=E2=80=8B On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Fedor Dikarev wrote: > Hello Muhammad Moinur Rahman! > > I've found that you are maintainer of net/ntopng freebsd port. > I've tried to build ntopng and found that it's marked as BROKEN. So I > started to analyse what's broken and find right URL for distfiles. And al= so > I've made some patches so now it can be build without gcc (I had build > successfully using clang on FreeBSD 10). > And today while I try to reproduce all of this I found that ntopng 1.2.1 > was released just few hours ago. > > So what your opinion, what will be better: should I send patches to you > and there will be net/ntopng11 in ports or upgrade net/ntopng to 1.2.1 is > just enough? > > -- > Fedor Dikarev > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 13:17:13 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E842E26 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 13:17:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14FE315C8 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 13:17:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s86DHCt6018812 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 13:17:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193394] /x11-wm/ede/ ede-keyboard-conf was compiled without XKB extension. Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 13:17:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: sasamotikomi@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Needs Triage X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 13:17:13 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193394 sasamotikomi@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, | |sasamotikomi@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 13:20:06 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD099FA6 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 13:20:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C364115DC for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 13:20:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s86DK6qi022129 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 13:20:06 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193394] x11-wm/ede/: ede-keyboard-conf was compiled without XKB extension. Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 13:20:06 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords bug_status short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 13:20:06 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193394 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |needs-patch, needs-qa Status|Needs Triage |Open Summary|/x11-wm/ede/ |x11-wm/ede/: |ede-keyboard-conf was |ede-keyboard-conf was |compiled without XKB |compiled without XKB |extension. |extension. --- Comment #1 from Kubilay Kocak --- This port has no maintainer. Please consider providing a patch to resolve the reported issue, and taking maintainership to ensure this port remains up to date and of a high quality. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 13:27:48 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F4A8626; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 13:27:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from qat.redports.org (qat.redports.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6420::233:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E3CF17FD; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 13:27:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redports.org; s=04012012; h=Sender:Message-Id:To:Subject:Reply-To:Date:To:Cc:From:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=sdh3V5sBJu7L67gyT3PaWaFEg9SatX3mkwc8g5ctL5M=; b=QvKjR5Pdc+nbT3jmAZtVQy0FMTvMe0irUEL8skqsW5/tdgjTIsQ7NT+vWffB3Q9LfNhuxw0ebHIpcy0MEw8eD8GVy64q/7eM764Px2lzSPZEqgXnuci7G+89bt1TwysZtAjWjeBsp4znE8ujmlAe07u11QJABPZm+NydMIUw23M=; Received: from www by qat.redports.org with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1XQG1q-0004dI-QF; Sat, 06 Sep 2014 13:27:46 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Ports-QAT" X-Trac-Version: 1.0.1 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 1.0.1, by Edgewall Software To: antoine@FreeBSD.org X-Trac-Project: redports Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 13:27:46 -0000 Reply-To: qat@redports.org X-URL: https://qat.redports.org/ Subject: [QAT] 367427: 4x leftovers To: antoine@FreeBSD.org X-Trac-Build-URL: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/20140906131400-41579 X-Trac-Build-ID: 20140906131400-41579 Message-Id: Sender: World Wide Web Owner Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, decke@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 13:27:48 -0000 Allow staging as a regular user --------------------------------------------------------------------- Build ID: 20140906131400-41579 Job owner: antoine@FreeBSD.org Buildtime: 14 minutes Enddate: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 13:27:45 GMT Revision: 367427 Repository: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=367427 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Port: ports-mgmt/chucky 1.0_1 Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~antoine@FreeBSD.org/20140906131400-41579-410318/chucky-1.0_1.log Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~antoine@FreeBSD.org/20140906131400-41579-410319/chucky-1.0_1.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~antoine@FreeBSD.org/20140906131400-41579-410320/chucky-1.0_1.log Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 Buildstatus: LEFTOVERS Log: https://qat.redports.org//~antoine@FreeBSD.org/20140906131400-41579-410321/chucky-1.0_1.log -- Buildarchive URL: redports From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 16:35:44 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 798DBBBC; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 16:35:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay010.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay010.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E54CF1A43; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 16:35:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgsOAF83C1RR8Z/O/2dsb2JhbABZgw2BILNWAVecZQQCgQAXd4REHCM8NCqIfQG+MY9NHYQ2BZxxjCiJBYNjO4J+AQEB Received: from 206.159-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.241.159.206]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 06 Sep 2014 18:35:35 +0200 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s86GZY4P011195; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 18:35:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 18:35:34 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: CONFLICTS_INSTALL and pkg Message-ID: <20140906183534.548d8fa1@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: bapt@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 16:35:44 -0000 Hi, Do we still need to specify CONFLICTS_INSTALL or does pkg handle that automatically now? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 16:40:58 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2196CEB for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 16:40:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-x229.google.com (mail-ob0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 807731B3E for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 16:40:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id wp18so403657obc.0 for ; Sat, 06 Sep 2014 09:40:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=OU2ugLl6xv2y21NEu7v7UbyIwpwCUE8m0kiwkU545oA=; b=zPqF7GlPJxCPF7rBIFDQcCT9jDUFYK/AA44/MOvX9IFj7MoQhLKvAWXBavd6nEej5B L+uV6xt1LBxxhj9/CYVCLx1zHf+tj0dpr4E1KHex7p8ogsKD8uqkwBBGKpDiLs1ArXmE AnV2xnD8ixxSQDi+GlT6r1JGQU6cWbUCHSsyPL5s242NLbMONuCHDHT9UvQb7TLOS9Us HPYKxbRhyknd5tRLGhhdQM80/IU0VZGIJqlVRgQfYmwJVZr5VXDaPUqAIMW5C/PYKWns wTsGleXeJxCEYLXkWZbfiEW4ctvxe2NklLK6Z/hHS9UKpFgxa4T3tm0oRMa2Bk3hbEPC DUDw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.210.195 with SMTP id mw3mr2136976obc.82.1410021657902; Sat, 06 Sep 2014 09:40:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.74.5 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 09:40:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 20:40:57 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: bug 191442 maintainer timeout From: Mikhail Tsatsenko To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 16:40:58 -0000 Hi, databases/py-sqlalchemy port is quite outdated for now. There is bug report https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191442 which has a patch to update. Initial version of the PR was submitted a long ago (2+ months), but the maintainer still did not respond. Can anybody please take care of the patch? Thanks! -- Mikhail From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 17:36:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 650B484D for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 17:36:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from astart2.astart.com (108-248-95-193.lightspeed.sndgca.sbcglobal.net [108.248.95.193]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CC391F6E for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 17:36:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop_93.private (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by astart2.astart.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s86Ha3CI026201 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 10:36:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from papowell@astart.com) Message-ID: <540B4603.2040004@astart.com> Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 10:36:03 -0700 From: Patrick Powell Reply-To: papowell@astart.com Organization: Astart Technologies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any update planned for www/mod_log_sql2 References: <540ACE6D.3040001@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <540ACE6D.3040001@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 17:36:12 -0000 On 09/06/14 02:05, Simon Wright wrote: > Hi Team! > > I was wondering whether mod_log_sql2 will be or can be updated to work > with the new default of Apache24? Apache22 is specified explictly in > the Makefile. > > I'm not sure whether mod_log_mysql is a replacement/substitute but > that is also linked explicitly to Apache22. > > An indication of any time line or migration path would be much > appreciated! > > Many thanks. > > Simon Wright. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I had a quick look at this (Note: I am NOT an Apache module expert, but I have updated a couple of them that I needed). The source code for the module needs to be updated to match Apache 2.4. There are more than a few trivial changes here. I you feel brave, look at: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/developer/new_api_2_4.html and http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/developer/modguide.html and http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_example.html From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 20:29:46 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57464E48 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 20:29:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DDFB1141 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 20:29:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s86KTkoP022596 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 20:29:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193383] [panic] /devel/subversion/ kernel panic when I update source tree or ports tree Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 20:29:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: arved@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Issue Resolved X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 20:29:46 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193383 Tilman Keskinoz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|In Discussion |Issue Resolved CC| |arved@FreeBSD.org Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Tilman Keskinoz --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 193380 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 20:39:15 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3940F828 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 20:39:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-x22e.google.com (mail-oi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0518D12E1 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 20:39:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f46.google.com with SMTP id g201so485501oib.33 for ; Sat, 06 Sep 2014 13:39:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=RxXIyKQCLppUrnvNSeN0VJ5fU69g1+Ceka1ZYJnvZj0=; b=VYmBy59ljEmApBcBa9g6IaXbva1sx1uLZ5+leXN1C7ksaA9qQsw8bR0P9J7LG5m54w 0eldvebfD9qXpJUjVJcW+rfPjfo1tOQ/g1+dQfuT1wY7gZESfw4lmXImsxMeqp7IUlKy TETtOdKEHNY2vptWprkb1vP7q7jvHk9/VEymOo6XCldofQ81jGDadH5GMZ4SDNrZb/KY vkSRiVvJJGITmG2l8mRnNTaZPxS46XNX9IK+oEub9H37ds3QW+ywepuKV36X32UG369S XQcNyud4+YDiffNy3An9YO7Ox+e5JGtj9g+l5tW7RNucdTqb2sAxEbVTOYOz4oEnqwhU ZpIA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.231.170 with SMTP id th10mr21715643obc.8.1410035954094; Sat, 06 Sep 2014 13:39:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.59.193 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 13:39:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2014 02:39:14 +0600 Message-ID: Subject: *_ENDIAN in 8 and 9 From: Muhammad Moinur Rahman <5u623l20@gmail.com> To: FreeBSD Ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 20:39:15 -0000 Hi, Can someone please help me troubleshoot a problem with ENDIANS. A piece of code is building properly in 9.3 and onwards with CLANG. But in 8.4 it's getting *_ENDIANS as undefined. What was the structural change in between 8.4 and 9 for the ENDIANS? Thanks in advance. BR, Muhammad From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 23:21:40 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB225227; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 23:21:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x22c.google.com (mail-wg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D74712AC; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 23:21:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id k14so429890wgh.27 for ; Sat, 06 Sep 2014 16:21:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=2Wtt1oeutyk3HOvU5iYRciADPbTMbF2y9b/DzfRNdjs=; b=cIaOZSTllLqAQYlfLsZlk88Q2tBqOjlvn1q32yE8PXmBcpPgpKNZzkgtIUCGv5aEwm tHp/hEgyDlVf6c1O16ZN98xsRAQbIxziTC4YJz2fl96IEYr6151368m5P19/aC4ovmo0 g/Gc2mQrs8CDKVlgcGxOp5AsnXYrgrf+3PVML4nXAHvfXTSGP3UGR3T1oE19okgUKX2+ wzz22nd2hWvpcxYOVeUL1uNcji2gtlCyttb0oTHwE49ZfJaAmg7+NSZZCpq9gGdbMvCa S7izpT3gcePdkCz/bo8J5GLOi8iRVLiYvT6BwoOKJR8fW82PIr5lKMlPdVSxwU+CeRqD TIvA== X-Received: by 10.194.77.84 with SMTP id q20mr24220689wjw.2.1410045698572; Sat, 06 Sep 2014 16:21:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id au4sm5955822wjc.15.2014.09.06.16.21.37 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 06 Sep 2014 16:21:37 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2014 01:21:35 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Tijl Coosemans Subject: Re: CONFLICTS_INSTALL and pkg Message-ID: <20140906232135.GD64862@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20140906183534.548d8fa1@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kvUQC+jR9YzypDnK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140906183534.548d8fa1@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 23:21:40 -0000 --kvUQC+jR9YzypDnK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 06:35:34PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Do we still need to specify CONFLICTS_INSTALL or does pkg handle that > automatically now? Yes, I think we should drop CONFLICTS_INSTALL because: 1/ pkg handle it automatically 2/ it prevents make package which is now done without installing so can be = done even if an installed package conflict. regards, Bapt --kvUQC+jR9YzypDnK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlQLlv8ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ewv0ACgjbF3HXjZSv9dJRzbIF+3pMng q3AAn0g9vJB+eEznHh/AM0dqgrpWxN0z =LYQv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kvUQC+jR9YzypDnK-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 23:25:49 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD9B835E for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 23:25:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from spring-chicken-ay.twitter.com (spring-chicken-ay.twitter.com [199.16.156.164]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75FEC12C0 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 23:25:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=twitter.com; s=dkim-201406; t=1410045939; bh=ppSB17j+qel7sKptQkdCToaofG744XwysyZ0S4iMKWI=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Feedback-ID: Message-ID; b=FuB14NbupJqXbm0FV9SusYKnxzi1l9ikvmtlShNJOn35WBYVcmPm52wSSud2vxG/H 1nxHZtL40b33gNmKDyb/o9Qv/yGI3qlh+uzm8guieuM6XD8Izkl1P0nS+BdQaO/mOc hyEXTyz1I2gioLgSxNzBopfdFHi5CD3FBq+8p4prWU4jiFmsD65GGV2mPO2f8MiJI8 uoBoRLH3ZbiQoezL3u30dKQSnhb2F+uylLCHCqv4p6vb7Kqa/swxo163d8VEVroPkX pbyaeoEmilUMu/R0+dUygyp94hpx4SkzZoI+TCqHmzk/nnewJS8urUoqegoYMOBuUW XUrxSZejsW5LQ== X-MSFBL: cG9ydHNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmdAYXRsYS1hcWotMjMtc3IxLUV2ZXJ5dGhpbmcuMTg0 QEV2ZXJ5dGhpbmdAcG9ydHNcQGZyZWVic2Qub3JnXEAxOFxAMjc2MzU2Njc3MFxA MFxAMTViZDE2MDA5YmU2ZWFmMzU1MGZmMWRjMTRlODQwMWM5MGJkZDIzZg== Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 23:25:39 +0000 From: Twitter To: Senajit Sunil Subject: Confirm your Twitter account, senajitur00! MIME-Version: 1.0 Feedback-ID: 16481b2a2bd9895cc9f3f73eb2:1d4a1426:none:twitterESP Message-ID: <2A.74.59195.3F79B045@twitter.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 23:25:49 -0000 Senajit Sunil, Please confirm your Twitter account ------------------------ Confirming your account will give you full access to Twitter and all future notifications will be sent to this email address. Confirm your account now: https://twitter.com/account/confirm_email/senajitur00/8AC7D-92HHB-141004 -- Forgot your Twitter password? Get instructions on how to reset it: https://twitter.com/account/resend_password Need help? https://support.twitter.com If you received this message in error and did not sign up for a Twitter account, click on the url below: https://twitter.com/account/not_my_account/senajitur00/8AC7D-92HHB-141004