Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 13:17:04 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= <gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu> To: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@flat.berklix.net> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Running i386 binaries on amd64 Message-ID: <44686330.2080506@t-hosting.hu> In-Reply-To: <200605150927.k4F9Rsiq079025@fire.jhs.private> References: <200605150927.k4F9Rsiq079025@fire.jhs.private>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian H. Stacey wrote: > gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu wrote: > >> either, you have to get the RELENG_6_1 >> > > RELENG_6_1 is for stable beyond, which jim might not want, > to match release if uname -r == 6.1-RELEASE : RELENG_6_1_0_RELEASE > RELENG_6_1 is *not* for stable, RELENG_6 is for stable. RELENG_6_1 is the security branch for 6.1-RELEASE, this should be used instead of RELENG_6_1_1_RELEASE. Currently, it doesn't make any sense, but later security fixes will go to RELENG_6_1 and it will be unwise to still use RELENG_6_1_0_RELEASE. Gabor Kovesdan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44686330.2080506>