From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Apr 21 18:59:29 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3A9971584F; Wed, 21 Apr 1999 18:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA46170;
	Wed, 21 Apr 1999 18:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
To: mi@aldan.algebra.com
Cc: peter@netplex.com.au (Peter Wemm), current@FreeBSD.ORG,
	stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: solid NFS patch #6 avail for -current - need testers files) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 21 Apr 1999 13:51:39 EDT."
             <199904211751.NAA31922@misha.cisco.com> 
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 18:56:24 -0700
Message-ID: <46168.924746184@zippy.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Speaking of, when can we expect to see this wonderfull _stability_
> improvement in -stable? I'm setting up a server here, and would

Usually when we're sure it's not a pessimization in other ways.  I
think people are getting just a bit prematurely excited here, not to
knock Matt's good work or anything but I think even he would be the
last to jump up and down saying "NFS is fixed!  It's totally perfect
now!" as some younger, less wise heads are currently saying. :-)

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message