Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 23:07:40 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Weak symbols in libc_r broken? Message-ID: <20000312230740.A8720@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20000313145201.H34294@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au>; from jb@cimlogic.com.au on Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 02:52:02PM %2B1100 References: <20000313145201.H34294@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 02:52:02PM +1100, John Birrell wrote:
> Is it just me, or are the weak symbols in libc_r confusing the linker?
Not just you. Jason and Mike Smith brought this to my attention on
Friday. I found that if one takes a fresh -CURRENT and then:
cd /usr/src/lib/libc_r
cvs -q up -D 1/27/2000
make all install
the susp.c code from the A&W Ptheads Programming book
(http://www.aw.com/cseng/titles/0-201-63392-2/code/) would then work with
compiled with "-static -pthread".
Your analysis if what is currently happening is correct.
--
-- David (obrien@NUXI.com)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000312230740.A8720>