Date: Tue, 8 Aug 1995 18:35:05 +1000 From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: bde@zeta.org.au, j@uriah.heep.sax.de Cc: current@freebsd.org, odiug@darkstar.informatik.rwth-aachen.de Subject: Re: bin/660: /bin/sh has problem with redirection. Message-ID: <199508080835.SAA32224@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> >... The pdksh also seems a lot smaller: >> >-rwxr-xr-x 1 bin bin 217088 Jul 4 22:38 ksh >> >lrwxr-xr-x 1 bin bin 3 Aug 8 01:16 sh -> ksh >> >-r-xr-xr-x 1 bin bin 299008 Jun 10 11:48 sh.old >> >> The difference is mostly for the 63K libedit.a that gives support for both >> vi and emacs mode line editing. >Isn't (pd)ksh also supposed to have command-line editing? It's probably less bloated. It is possible to write a file editor in 2K, Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199508080835.SAA32224>